Management of Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors

Combined visual and quantitative assessment of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy for staging and restaging of neuroendocrine tumors

PURPOSE

Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) using 111In-DTPA-DPhe1-octreotide (pentetreotide) has become an integral part of neuroendocrine neoplasm management. The lack of precise quantification is a disadvantage of SRS. This study aimed to adapt the standardized uptake value (SUV) to SRS, establish the SUV range for physiological uptake in the liver, kidney, and spleen, and elucidate the utility of combined visual and quantitative SRS assessment for staging and restaging of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included 21 patients with NETs who underwent 111In-pentetreotide SRS. The SUV of physiological and pathological uptake was calculated using bone single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) quantitative analysis software (GI-BONE). For visual analysis, the primary and metastatic lesions were scored visually on planar and SPECT images using a five-point scale. We assessed the relationships between the SUVs of the liver, kidney, and spleen in the dual phase, and among quantitative indices, visual score, and pathological lesions classification.

RESULTS

Sixty-three NEN lesions were evaluated. The mean ± standard deviation maximum SUVs (SUVmax) were liver: 4 h, 2.6 ± 1.0; 24 h, 2.2 ± 1.0; kidney: 4 h, 8.9 ± 1.8; 24 h, 7.0 ± 2.0; and spleen; 4 h, 11.3 ± 4.5; 24 h, 11.5 ± 7.6. Higher SUVmax was significantly associated with higher visual scores on dual-phase SPECT (4 h, p < 0.001; 24 h, p < 0.001) (4 h: scores 3 and 4, p < 0.05; scores 3 and 5: p < 0.01; scores 4 and 5: p < 0.01; 24 h: scores 3 and 4, p = 0.0748; scores 3 and 5: p < 0.01; scores 4 and 5: p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

We adapted the SUV to SRS and established the range of SUV for physiological uptake in the liver, kidney, and spleen. Combined visual and quantitative assessment is useful for imaging individual lesions in greater detail, and may serve as a new tumor marker of SRS for staging and restaging of NETs.

GASTRIC NEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR: WHEN SURGICAL TREATMENT IS INDICATED?

BACKGROUND

Gastric neuroendocrine tumors are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms that produce bioactive substances. Their treatment varies according to staging and classification, using endoscopic techniques, open surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and drugs analogous to somatostatin.

AIMS

To identify and review cases of gastric neuroendocrine neoplasia submitted to surgical treatment.

METHODS

Review of surgically treated patients from 1983 to 2018.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients were included, predominantly female (73.33%), with a mean age of 55.93 years. The most common symptom was epigastric pain (93.3%), and the mean time of symptom onset was 10.07 months. The preoperative upper digestive endoscopy (UDE) indicated a predominance of cases with 0 to 1 lesion (60%), sizing ≥1.5 cm (40%), located in the gastric antrum (53.33%), with ulceration (60%), and Borrmann III (33.33%) classification. The assessment of the surgical specimen indicated a predominance of invasive neuroendocrine tumors (60%), with angiolymphatic invasion in most cases (80%). Immunohistochemistry for chromogranin A was positive in 60% of cases and for synaptophysin in 66.7%, with a predominant Ki-67 index between 0 and 2%. Metastasis was observed in 20% of patients. The surgical procedure most performed was subtotal gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction (53.3%). Tumor recurrence occurred in 20% of cases and a new treatment was required in 26.67%.

CONCLUSIONS

Gastric neuroendocrine tumors have a low incidence in the general population, and surgical treatment is indicated for advanced lesions. The study of its management gains importance in view of the specificities of each case and the need for adequate conduct to prevent recurrences and complications.

Therapeutic Challenges for Gastric Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Take It or Leave It?

Background and Objectives: Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (gNENs) represent rare but increasingly recognized tumors. They are distinguished into three main clinical types (type-1, type-2, and type-3) according to gastrin level and at histological evaluation in well-differentiated G1, G2, or G3 lesions, as well as poorly-differentiated lesions. Small type-1 and type-2 neoplasms with low proliferation indices demonstrated excellent survival without progression during an extended follow-up period, and for these reasons, active endoscopic observation or endoscopic resection are feasible options. On the other hand, surgery is the treatment of choice for more aggressive type-3, G3, or infiltrating neoplasms. The present study aims to comprehensively review and compare the available therapeutic strategies for gNENs. Materials and Methods: A computerized literature search was performed using relevant keywords to identify all of the pertinent articles with particular attention to gNEN endoscopic treatment. Results: In recent years, different endoscopic resective techniques (such as endoscopic mucosal dissection, modified endoscopic mucosal resection, and endoscopic full-thickness resection) have been developed, showing a high rate of complete resection for advanced and more aggressive lesions. Conclusions: Overall, gNENs represent a heterogeneous group of lesions with varying behavior which require personalized management. The non-operative approach for small type-1 gNENs seems to be feasible and should be promoted. A step-up approach with minimally invasive endoscopic therapies might be proposed, particularly for type-1 gNEN. On the other hand, it is important to recognize the negative prognostic factors in order to identify those rare cases requiring more aggressive approaches. A possible therapeutic algorithm for localized gNEN management is provided.

Role of Advanced Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in the Comprehensive Management of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), also called neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), are relatively uncommon, heterogenous tumors primarily originating in the gastrointestinal tract. With the improvement in technology and increasing use of cross-sectional imaging and endoscopy, they are being discovered with increasing frequency. Although traditionally considered indolent tumors with good prognoses, some NENs exhibit aggressive behavior. Timely diagnosis, risk stratification, and management can often be a challenge. In general, small NENs without local invasion or lymphovascular involvement can often be managed using minimally invasive advanced endoscopic techniques, while larger lesions and those with evidence of lymphovascular invasion require surgery, systemic therapy, or a combination thereof. Ideal management requires a comprehensive and accurate understanding of the stage and grade of the tumor. With the recent advancements, a therapeutic advanced endoscopist can play a pivotal role in diagnosing, staging, and managing this rare condition. High-definition white light imaging and digital image enhancing technologies like narrow band imaging (NBI) in the newer endoscopes have improved the diagnostic accuracy of traditional endoscopy. The refinement of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) over the past decade has revolutionized the role of endoscopy in diagnosing and managing various pathologies, including NENs. In addition to EUS-directed diagnostic biopsies, it also offers the ability to precisely assess the depth of invasion and lymphovascular involvement and thus stage NENs accurately. EUS-directed locoregional ablative therapies are increasingly recognized as highly effective, minimally invasive treatment modalities for NENs, particularly pancreatic NENs. Advanced endoscopic resection techniques like endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), endoscopic submucosal resection (EMR), and endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) have been increasingly used over the past decade with excellent results in achieving curative resection of various early-stage gastrointestinal luminal lesions including NENs. In this article, we aim to delineate NENs of the different segments of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract (esophagus, gastric, pancreatic, and small and large intestine) and their management with emphasis on the endoscopic management of these tumors.

Neuroendocrine Tumor Metastases to the Breast: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Breast metastases from neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are considered infrequent. We report a case of a patient with ileocecal neuroendocrine tumor (NET) metastases to both breasts, for whom the initial clinical presentation was chronic diarrhea. Breast metastasis was initially suspected by a 68-Gallium DOTANOC positron emission tomography (PET)/CT and was confirmed by histopathology. We also performed a literature review in which we identified 116 cases of NENs metastatic to the breast reported so far. Most cases occurred in older women, were caused by NETs, and had the gastrointestinal tract as the primary site.

Small bowel neuroendocrine tumors: An analysis of clinical presentation, diagnostic workup and surgical approach—A single center retrospective study

Background

Neurocrine neoplasms (NEN) of the small bowel (SBNEN) are a rare entity and mostly asymptomatic. The aim of this study was to explore trends in the clinical presentation, diagnostic workup, surgical approach and oncological outcome in patients with SBNEN at our surgical department.

Materials and methods

All patients who underwent surgical resection for SBNEN from 2004 to 2020 at our department were enrolled in this single center retrospective study.

Results

A total of 32 patients were included in this study. In most cases, the diagnosis was based on incidental findings during endoscopy or radiographic imaging (n = 23; 72%). Twenty cases had a G1 tumor and 12 cases a G2 tumor. The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) were 96%, 86% and 81%, respectively. Patients with a tumor more than 30 mm had a significantly lower OS (p = 0.01). For G1 tumors, the estimated disease-free survival (DFS) was 109 months. Again, the DFS was significantly lower when the tumor had more than 30 mm in diameter (p = 0.013).

Conclusion

Due to the mostly asymptomatic presentation, the diagnostic workup can be difficult. An aggressive approach and a strict follow-up seem to be important for the oncological outcome.

Diagnostic Management of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Technique Optimization and Tips and Tricks for Radiologists

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) comprise a heterogeneous group of neoplasms, which derive from cells of the diffuse neuroendocrine system that specializes in producing hormones and neuropeptides and arise in most cases sporadically and, to a lesser extent, in the context of complex genetic syndromes. Furthermore, they are primarily nonfunctioning, while, in the case of insulinomas, gastrinomas, glucagonomas, vipomas, and somatostatinomas, they produce hormones responsible for clinical syndromes. The GEP-NEN tumor grade and cell differentiation may result in different clinical behaviors and prognoses, with grade one (G1) and grade two (G2) neuroendocrine tumors showing a more favorable outcome than grade three (G3) NET and neuroendocrine carcinoma. Two critical issues should be considered in the NEN diagnostic workup: first, the need to identify the presence of the tumor, and, second, to define the primary site and evaluate regional and distant metastases. Indeed, the primary site, stage, grade, and function are prognostic factors that the radiologist should evaluate to guide prognosis and management. The correct diagnostic management of the patient includes a combination of morphological and functional evaluations. Concerning morphological evaluations, according to the consensus guidelines of the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS), computed tomography (CT) with a contrast medium is recommended. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), is usually indicated for use to evaluate the liver, pancreas, brain, and bones. Ultrasonography (US) is often helpful in the initial diagnosis of liver metastases, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) can solve problems in characterizing the liver, as this tool can guide the biopsy of liver lesions. In addition, intraoperative ultrasound is an effective tool during surgical procedures. Positron emission tomography (PET-CT) with FDG for nonfunctioning lesions and somatostatin analogs for functional lesions are very useful for identifying and evaluating metabolic receptors. The detection of heterogeneity in somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression is also crucial for treatment decision making. In this narrative review, we have described the role of morphological and functional imaging tools in the assessment of GEP-NENs according to current major guidelines.

Trends in incidence and survival in patients with gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors: A SEER database analysis, 1977-2016

Objectives

We aimed to determine trends in incidence and survival in patients with gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (GI-NETs) from 1977 to 2016, and then analyze the potential risk factors including sex, age, race, grade, Socioeconomic status (SES), site, and stage.

Methods

Data were obtained from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, relative survival rates (RSRs), and Cox proportional risk regression model were used to evaluate the relationship between these factors and prognosis.

Results

Compared with other sites, the small intestine and rectum have the highest incidence, and the appendix and rectum had the highest survival rate. The incidence was higher in males than in females, and the survival rate in males was close to females. Blacks had a higher incidence rate than whites, but similar survival rates. Incidence and survival rates were lower for G3&4 than for G1 and G2. Age, stage, and grade are risk factors.

Conclusions

This study described changes in the incidence and survival rates of GI-NETs from 1977 to 2016 and performed risk factor analyses related to GI-NETs.

New frontiers in imaging including radiomics updates for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

OBJECTIVE

To illustrate the applications of various imaging tools including conventional MDCT, MRI including DWI, CT & MRI radiomics, FDG & DOTATATE PET-CT for diagnosis, staging, grading, prognostication, treatment planning and assessing treatment response in cases of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNENs).

BACKGROUND

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP NENs) are very diverse clinically & biologically. Their treatment and prognosis depend on staging and primary site, as well as histological grading, the importance of which is also reflected in the recently updated WHO classification of GEP NENs. Grade 3 poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) are aggressive & nearly always advanced at diagnosis with poor prognosis; whereas Grades-1 and 2 well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) can be quite indolent. Grade 3 well-differentiated NETs represent a new category of neoplasm with an intermediate prognosis. Importantly, the evidence suggest grade heterogeneity can occur within a given tumor and even grade progression can occur over time. Emerging evidence suggests that several non-invasive qualitative and quantitative imaging features on CT, dual-energy CT (DECT), MRI, PET and somatostatin receptor imaging with new tracers, as well as texture analysis, may be useful to grade, prognosticate, and accurately stage primary NENs. Imaging features may also help to inform choice of treatment and follow these neoplasms post-treatment.

CONCLUSION

GEP NENs treatment and prognosis depend on the stage as well as histological grade of the tumor. Traditional ways of imaging evaluation for diagnosis and staging does not yet yield sufficient information to replace operative and histological evaluation. Recognition of important qualitative imaging features together with quantitative features and advanced imaging tools including functional imaging with DWI MRI, DOTATATE PET/CT, texture analysis with radiomics and radiogenomic features appear promising for more accurate staging, tumor risk stratification, guiding management and assessing treatment response.

Aberrant transcription factors in the cancers of the pancreas

Transcription factors (TFs) are essential for proper activation of gene set during the process of organogenesis, differentiation, lineage specificity. Reactivation or dysregulation of TFs regulatory networks could lead to deformation of organs, diseases including various malignancies. Currently, understanding the mechanism of oncogenesis became necessity for the development of targeted therapeutic strategy for different cancer types. It is evident that many TFs go awry in cancers of the pancreas such as pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs). These mutated or dysregulated TFs abnormally controls various signaling pathways in PDAC and PanNENs including RTK, PI3K-PTEN-AKT-mTOR, JNK, TGF-β/SMAD, WNT/β-catenin, SHH, NOTCH and VEGF which in turn regulate different hallmarks of cancer. Aberrant regulation of such pathways have been linked to the initiation, progression, metastasis, and resistance in pancreatic cancer. As of today, a number of TFs has been identified as crucial regulators of pancreatic cancer and a handful of them shown to have potential as therapeutic targets in pre-clinical and clinical settings. In this review, we have summarized the current knowledge on the role and therapeutic usefulness of TFs in PDAC and PanNENs.

Childhood neuroendocrine tumors of the digestive system: A single center experience

The prevalence and incidence of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are increasing in the pediatric population. This increase can be associated with improved diagnostics and increased detection rates of the disease. We aimed to discuss the clinical and pathological characteristics of patients with this rare disease who were followed and treated at our center.The medical records of children (aged 0-18 years) with NETs of the digestive system, followed up and treated between 2007 and 2020 at Ondokuz Mayis University Faculty of Medicine, were reviewed.Overall, 16 patients (8 girls and 8 boys) were analyzed. Fifteen patients had NETs in the appendix; 14 of these had grade I NETs, and 1 had grade II NETs. No additional surgery was performed except for appendectomy. All patients were in complete remission at the last follow-up (median 38 months). The other patient, a 12-year-old girl, had a primary hepatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (grade III NET). Three cycles of neoadjuvant and adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy were administered, and right hepatectomy was performed to remove the mass. The patient is being followed-up for approximately 3 years without disease recurrence.Most NETs are observed in adults, and most studies have focused on this population. Unlike adults, increasing awareness of the disease in the pediatric population (especially in cases of acute appendicitis), discovering therapeutic treatments, and sharing experiences are crucial for developing an optimal therapeutic approach for pediatric NETs.

HRAS overexpression predicts response to Lenvatinib treatment in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

INTRODUCTION

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a rare group of tumors exceptionally heterogeneous, with clinical presentation ranging from well differentiated more indolent tumors to poorly differentiated very aggressive forms. Both are often diagnosed after the metastatic spread and require appropriate medical treatment. A high priority need in the management of this disease is the identification of effective therapeutic strategies for advanced and metastatic patients. The recent TALENT trial demonstrated the efficacy of lenvatinib, a multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) with no other treatment indication. Further development of this drug in advanced NETs is warranted.

METHODS

We investigated potential clinical and molecular determinants of lenvatinib response in human primary cultures derived from patients with GEP-NET of different grades and sites of origin. We correlated response to treatment with patient clinical characteristics, with the mutational status of 161-cancer associated genes and with the expression levels of MKI-related genes.

RESULTS

Lenvatinib exerted a significant antitumor activity in primary GEP-NET cells, with median survival inhibitions similar or higher than those of standard frontline treatments. Of the 11 primary cultures analyzed in our case series, 6 were classified as responder showing a significant survival inhibition, and 5 as non-responder. We observed that the overexpression of HRAS in the original tumor tissue compared to the matched healthy tissue significantly correlated with responsiveness of primary cells to lenvatinib (p=.048). All 5 non-responder cultures showed normal HRAS expression, while of the 6 responder cultures, 4 had HRAS overexpression. Overexpression of HRAS was not associated with gene mutation. None of the other evaluated clinical variables (grade, Ki67, site of origin and syndromic disease) or molecular markers correlated with response.

DISCUSSION

Lenvatinib appears to be a highly effective drug for the treatment of NETs. The evaluation of HRAS expression in the tumor tissue might improve patient selection and optimize therapeutic outcome.

Somatostatin and Its Receptor System in Colorectal Cancer

Somatostatin (SST)/somatotropin release-inhibiting factor (SRIF) is a well-known neuropeptide, widely distributed in the central and peripheral nervous systems, that regulates the endocrine system and affects neurotransmission via interaction with five SST receptors (SST1-5). In the gastrointestinal tract, the main SST-producing cells include intestinal enteroendocrine cells (EECs) restricted to the mucosa, and neurons of the submucosal and myenteric plexuses. The action of the SRIF system is based on the inhibition of endocrine and exocrine secretion, as well as the proliferative responses of target cells. The SST1–5 share common signaling pathways, and are not only widely expressed on normal tissues, but also frequently overexpressed by several tumors, particularly neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). Furthermore, the SRIF system represents the only peptide/G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) system with multiple approved clinical applications for the diagnosis and treatment of several NENs. The role of the SRIF system in the histogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC) subtypes (e.g., adenocarcinoma and signet ring-cell carcinoma), as well as diagnosis and prognosis of mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC) and pure adenocarcinoma, is poorly understood. Moreover, the impact of the SRIF system signaling on CRC cell proliferation and its potential role in the progression of this cancer remains unknown. Therefore, this review summarizes the recent collective knowledge and understanding of the clinical significance of the SRIF system signaling in CRC, aiming to evaluate the potential role of its components in CRC histogenesis, diagnosis, and potential therapy.

Incidence, Clinical Presentation and Trends in Indication for Diagnostic Work-Up of Small Intestinal and Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Background: The incidence of small intestinal (SI) and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (siNETs and pNETs) seems to have increased. The increased frequency of incidental findings might be a possible explanation. The study aimed to examine (1) changes in incidence and the stage at diagnosis (2010–2011 vs. 2019–2020), (2) changes in the initial indication for diagnostic workup and 3) the differences in stage between incidentally discovered vs. symptomatic disease during the entire study period. Methods: We performed a retrospective study, that includes consecutive siNET and pNET patients referred to the Copenhagen ENETS center of excellence in 2010–2011 and 2019–2020. Results: The annual incidence of siNET per 100,000 increased from 1.39 to 1.84, (p = 0.05). There was no change in the stage at diagnosis, and in both periods approximately 30% of patients were incidentally diagnosed (p = 0.62). Dissemination was found in 72/121 (60%) of symptomatic vs. 22/50 (44%) of incidentally discovered SI tumors in the entire cohort, (p = 0.06). The annual incidence of pNET increased from 0.42 to 1.39 per 100,000, (p < 0.001). The proportion of patients with disseminated disease decreased from 8/21 (38%) to 12/75 (16%), (p = 0.02) and the number of incidental findings increased from 4/21 (19%) to 43/75 (57%), (p = 0.002). More symptomatic patients had disseminated disease compared to patients with incidentally discovered tumors (15/49 (31%) vs. 5/47 (11%), (p = 0.01)). Conclusion: The incidence of siNET and pNETs increased over the past decade. For siNETs, the stage of disease and the distribution of symptomatic vs. incidentally discovered tumors were unchanged between the two periods. Patients with pNETs presented with more local and incidentally discovered tumors in the latter period. Patients with incidentally discovered siNETs had disseminated disease in 44% of the overall cases. The vast majority of incidentally found pNETs were localized.

Head-to-head comparison between 18 F-DOPA PET/CT and 68 Ga-DOTA peptides PET/CT in detecting intestinal neuroendocrine tumours: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The imaging of intestinal neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) relies on functional positron emission tomography (PET) tracers; these tumours can be studied by means of both ⁶⁸ Ga-DOTA peptides and ¹⁸ F-fluorodihydroxyphenyl- l-alanine (¹⁸ F-DOPA) PET/computed tomography (CT). As yet, it is unclear which of these two modalities offers the better sensitivity. We therefore conducted a meta-analysis to assess the available data.

METHODS

PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus and Web of Science were searched for studies comparing the sensitivity of ⁶⁸ Ga-DOTA peptides and ¹⁸ F-DOPA PET/CT; papers up to February 2021 were considered. In each study, we considered sensitivity in terms of patient-based analysis (PBA), region-based analysis (RBA) and lesion-based analysis (LBA), and pooled the results yielded by each tracer. Multidisciplinary follow-up served as the standard of truth.

RESULTS

Of the 636 records identified, 6 articles published between 2008 and 2021 were finally selected, and 112 intestinal NETs patients were included. The pooled sensitivity of ¹⁸ F-DOPA PET/CT was 83%, 89% and 95% on PBA, RBA and LBA, respectively. ⁶⁸ Ga-DOTA peptides PET/CT showed sensitivity of 88%, 92% and 82% on PBA, RBA and LBA, respectively. No significant differences were found between the two tracers on PBA and RBA. By contrast, a clear trend towards significance in favour of ¹⁸ F-DOPA PET/CT was identified on LBA. The presence of a significant difference in favour of ¹⁸ F-DOPA PET/CT was confirmed in a subgroup analysis conducted only on the most recent and largest studies. In all three analyses, mild-to-high heterogeneity was found; however, no publication bias was observed.

CONCLUSION

Both ¹⁸ F-DOPA PET/CT and ⁶⁸ Ga-DOTA-peptides PET/CT are reliable diagnostic procedures in patients with intestinal NETs. However, in terms of lesion detection, a non-negligible difference in favour of ¹⁸ F-DOPA PET/CT was observed. Thus, the use of ¹⁸ F-DOPA PET/CT could be considered as a first-line molecular procedure in intestinal NETs.

The new WHO classification of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors and immunohistochemical expression of somatostatin receptor 2 and 5

The 2019 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of gastrointestinal tumors defines well-differentiated grade 3 neuroendocrine tumors, the mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine tumors (MiNENs) and classifies goblet cell carcinoid as goblet cell adenocarcinoma. The expression of somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) is the foundation for somatostatin analogue therapy. At present, there are only a few studies that have analyzed the immunohistochemical reactivity of SSTRs in gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the immunohistochemical expression of SSTR2 and SSTR5 in gastrointestinal NENs and goblet cell adenocarcinomas and the correlation of these markers with clinical and morphological factors. The study included 67 patients with NENs and 4 patients with adenocarcinoma ex-goblet cell carcinoid diagnosed between January 2008 and December 2018. Tumors were reclassified according to the 2019 WHO classification. Immunohistochemical staining for chromogranin A, synaptophysin, Ki-67, p53, SSTR2, and SSTR5 were performed in all the cases. The results showed that, G1 and G2 neuroendocrine tumors were more common SSTR2-positive in comparison with G3 carcinomas (P<0.0001). In addition, 33.3% of neuroendocrine carcinomas and 2 cases of low-grade adenocarcinoma ex-goblet cell carcinoid were SSTR2-positive. Neuroendocrine carcinomas had significantly lower SSTR2 and SSTR5 expression compared with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (P=0.0130; P=0.0437, respectively). The SSTR2 expression in the early tumor stages was 100%, more often than in advanced stages (55.6%; P=0.0011). The results demonstrated the decrease in SSTR2 expression with increasing malignancy and tumor stage. The SSTR2-positive expression in neuroendocrine carcinomas and adenocarcinoma ex-goblet cell carcinoid provides evidence for the benefits of somatostatin analog treatment associated with surgery and chemotherapy.

Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Gastrointestinal Tract: A Focused Review and Practical Approach for Gastroenterologists

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare tumors derived from the neuroendocrine cell system, and more commonly found in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Over the last decades, the incidence of GI-NETs has been steadily increasing, partly due to the expanding indications for endoscopy. Most patients with NETs are asymptomatic, and their NETs are noticed during screening examinations; thus, endoscopists are on the frontline of the diagnosis of GI-NETs. Since GI-NETs are less frequent than other malignancies, the natural history, diagnosis, and management of these tumors may not be fully understood. In this review, we aim to update the endoscopist on key clinical features and management of patients with gastric, duodenal, and rectal NETs.

Paraneoplastic Cushing Syndrome in Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour

Ectopic production of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) by gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) is relatively uncommon. We report a rare case of a liver metastatic G1 low-grade NET of the intestine that induced hypercortisolism after surgical resection. A 50-year-old man was admitted for an intestinal obstruction caused by a tumour of the intestine. Paraneoplastic Cushing syndrome was diagnosed more than a year later following the appearance of cushingoid symptoms, despite stable disease according to RECIST criteria but chromogranin A increase. Ketoconazole and sandostatin medical treatment and liver chemoembolization never managed to control the hypercortisolism unlike the bilateral adrenalectomy. The identification and effective management of this uncommon statement of ectopic ACTH secretion is important to improve the patient's prognosis and quality of life.

Metastatic neuroendocrine carcinoma presenting with left lateral rectus enlargement and orbital cellulitis

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the orbit are a rare but increasingly recognized clinical phenomenon. The vast majority of orbital NETs are metastatic, and most metastasize from the gastrointestinal system to the extraocular muscles. While orbital metastasis typically occurs in the setting of a known primary neoplasm, some cases represent the initial manifestation of disease and can precede detection of the primary tumor by many months. We report a 58-year-old woman who presented with diplopia, unilateral orbital pain, erythema, and chemosis as the primary presentation of a metastatic small intestine NET. This case serves as a reminder that identification of orbital NETs should prompt investigation for primary gastrointestinal or pulmonary NETs. Goals of surgery include obtaining a tissue sample, debulking the lesion, and preserving visual function.

Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms (GI-NENs): hot topics in morphological, functional, and prognostic imaging

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are heterogeneous tumours with a common phenotype descended from the diffuse endocrine system. NENs are found nearly anywhere in the body but the most frequent location is the gastrointestinal tract. Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms (GI-NENs) are rather uncommon, representing around 2% of all gastrointestinal tumours and 20–30% of all primary neoplasms of the small bowel. GI-NENs have various clinical manifestations due to the different substances they can produce; some of these tumours appear to be associated with familial syndromes, such as multiple endocrine neoplasm and neurofibromatosis type 1. The current WHO classification (2019) divides NENs into three major categories: well-differentiated NENs, poorly differentiated NENs, and mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms. The diagnosis, localization, and staging of GI-NENs include morphology and functional imaging, above all contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT), and in the field of nuclear medicine imaging, a key role is played by ⁶⁸Ga-labelled-somatostatin analogues (⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-peptides) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/TC). In this review of recent literature, we described the objectives of morphological/functional imaging and potential future possibilities of prognostic imaging in the assessment of GI-NENs.

Biodistribution of 18F-AlF-NOTA-octreotide in Different Organs and Characterization of Uptake in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

PURPOSE

The aims of this study were threefold: [1] to describe the biodistribution of ¹⁸F-AlF-NOTA-octreotide (¹⁸F-OC) in normal organs; [2] to evaluate the range of uptake of NEN and benign lesions using the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max); and [3] to compare the difference in ¹⁸F-OC uptake among tumors of different grades.

METHODS

This study included 162 patients (67 females and 95 males) who received ¹⁸F-OC positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT), 128 of whom were diagnosed with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). The SUV_max and SUV_mean of ¹⁸F-OC were measured in 21 normal anatomical structures. We compared the differences among G1, G2, and G3 NENs, as well as between NENs and benign lesions.

RESULTS

High physiological uptake of ¹⁸F-OC (SUV_max > 6.77) was detected in the spleen, adrenal gland, renal parenchyma, pituitary gland, and liver. Moderate uptake (SUV_max 3.00-6.77) was found in the uncinate process of the pancreas (PU), prostate, thyroid, and uterus. Mild uptake (SUV_max 1.34-3.00) was observed in the small intestine, pancreas (pancreas uptake except for the head of the pancreas), gallbladder, and transverse colon. The SUV_max of NENs was higher than that of benign lesions, including fractures, inflamed tissue, reactive hyperplasia, and degenerative disease. However, overlap was noted between the two groups. The SUV_max of ¹⁸F-OC uptake by tumors was significantly correlated with tumor grade in primary lesions and those of the lymph node, bone, and other sites (all P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The results obtained from the majority of the samples in this study show the biodistribution of ¹⁸F-OC in normal organs and have significance as a reference. Although some benign lesions show variable uptake, the uptake by these lesions is still different from that of NENs. NENs of different grades have differences in ¹⁸F-OC uptake levels.

A Patient with an Ileocecal MiNEN and a Synchronous Squamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Case Report and Review of the Literature

Mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) are rare tumors composed of two different histological components, one of which is of a neuroendocrine origin. Given its suggested underdiagnosis and consequent low prevalence, no clear diagnostic and treatment guidelines are available, and treatment usually follows regimens similar to that of the most aggressive component. On the other hand, multiple primary tumors (MPTs) are also rare neoplastic entities that usually confer a challenge regarding treatment options, for a regimen that comprises both the primary and the synchronous/metachronous malignancy should be used. Here, we discuss the challenging diagnostic and therapeutic management of a patient with an ileocecal MiNEN that presented along with a synchronous squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (SQ-NSCLC). The patient presented with intestinal obstruction symptoms for which he underwent an emergency resection of the ileocecal MiNEN. An initial CT scan showed an additional lung mass later identified as an SQ-NSCLC after bronchoscopy biopsy analysis. Given the rapid hepatic metastatic progression, palliative platinum-based chemotherapy was initiated, with an adequate response of the local and metastatic lesions of the MiNEN, but suggested platinum resistance and progression of the pulmonary neoplasm. Second-line treatment with pembrolizumab directed for the SQ-NSCLC was initiated; however, it was stopped after immune-mediated toxicities developed. A third-line chemotherapy scheme with carboplatin/gemcitabine was initiated, but central nervous system (CNS) progression developed, with the patient dying 11 months after initial diagnosis.

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: A clinical snapshot

Our understanding about the epidemiological aspects, pathogenesis, molecular diagnosis, and targeted therapies of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) have drastically advanced in the past decade. Gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) NENs originate from the enteroendocrine cells of the embryonic gut which share common endocrine and neural differentiation factors. Most NENs are well-differentiated, and slow growing. Specific neuroendocrine biomarkers that are used in the diagnosis of functional NENs include insulin, glucagon, vasoactive intestinal polypeptide, gastrin, somatostatin, adrenocorticotropin, growth hormone releasing hormone, parathyroid hormone-related peptide, serotonin, histamine, and 5-hydroxy indole acetic acid (5-HIAA). Biomarkers such as pancreatic polypeptide, human chorionic gonadotrophin subunits, neurotensin, ghrelin, and calcitonin are used in the diagnosis of non-functional NENs. 5-HIAA levels correlate with tumour burden, prognosis and development of carcinoid heart disease and mesenteric fibrosis, however several diseases, medications and edible products can falsely elevate the 5-HIAA levels. Organ-specific transcription factors are useful in the differential diagnosis of metastasis from an unknown primary of well-differentiated NENs. Emerging novel biomarkers include circulating tumour cells, circulating tumour DNA, circulating micro-RNAs, and neuroendocrine neoplasms test (NETest) (simultaneous measurement of 51 neuroendocrine-specific marker genes in the peripheral blood). NETest has high sensitivity (85%-98%) and specificity (93%-97%) for the detection of gastrointestinal NENs, and is useful for monitoring treatment response, recurrence, and prognosis. In terms of management, surgery, radiofrequency ablation, symptom control with medications, chemotherapy and molecular targeted therapies are all considered as options. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment, but depends on factors including age of the individual, location, stage, grade, functional status, and the heredity of the tumour (sporadic vs inherited). Medical management is helpful to alleviate the symptoms, manage inoperable lesions, suppress postoperative tumour growth, and manage recurrences. Several molecular-targeted therapies are considered second line to somatostatin analogues. This review is a clinical update on the pathophysiological aspects, diagnostic algorithm, and management of GEP NENs.

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: A clinical snapshot

Our understanding about the epidemiological aspects, pathogenesis, molecular diagnosis, and targeted therapies of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) have drastically advanced in the past decade. Gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) NENs originate from the enteroendocrine cells of the embryonic gut which share common endocrine and neural differentiation factors. Most NENs are well-differentiated, and slow growing. Specific neuroendocrine biomarkers that are used in the diagnosis of functional NENs include insulin, glucagon, vasoactive intestinal polypeptide, gastrin, somatostatin, adrenocorticotropin, growth hormone releasing hormone, parathyroid hormone-related peptide, serotonin, histamine, and 5-hydroxy indole acetic acid (5-HIAA). Biomarkers such as pancreatic polypeptide, human chorionic gonadotrophin subunits, neurotensin, ghrelin, and calcitonin are used in the diagnosis of non-functional NENs. 5-HIAA levels correlate with tumour burden, prognosis and development of carcinoid heart disease and mesenteric fibrosis, however several diseases, medications and edible products can falsely elevate the 5-HIAA levels. Organ-specific transcription factors are useful in the differential diagnosis of metastasis from an unknown primary of well-differentiated NENs. Emerging novel biomarkers include circulating tumour cells, circulating tumour DNA, circulating micro-RNAs, and neuroendocrine neoplasms test (NETest) (simultaneous measurement of 51 neuroendocrine-specific marker genes in the peripheral blood). NETest has high sensitivity (85%-98%) and specificity (93%-97%) for the detection of gastrointestinal NENs, and is useful for monitoring treatment response, recurrence, and prognosis. In terms of management, surgery, radiofrequency ablation, symptom control with medications, chemotherapy and molecular targeted therapies are all considered as options. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment, but depends on factors including age of the individual, location, stage, grade, functional status, and the heredity of the tumour (sporadic vs inherited). Medical management is helpful to alleviate the symptoms, manage inoperable lesions, suppress postoperative tumour growth, and manage recurrences. Several molecular-targeted therapies are considered second line to somatostatin analogues. This review is a clinical update on the pathophysiological aspects, diagnostic algorithm, and management of GEP NENs.

Radiology of the neuroendocrine neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract: a comprehensive review

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a group of neoplasms arising from the diffuse endocrine system (DES). The gastrointestinal tract (GIT) is the most common site of NEN. The WHO classification divides NEN into three broad categories viz. well-differentiated NENs, poorly differentiated NENs, and mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms. All GIT NEN have the potential to synthesize and secrete various bioactive substances which may lead to various clinical syndromes. The NEN may occur anywhere in the GIT and exhibit varying clinical presentation, prognosis, and metastatic potential. Further, some tumors show association with familial syndromes like multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 and neurofibromatosis type 1. Ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography-CT are the imaging modalities useful in the diagnosis, localization, and staging of GIT NEN. Management depends on the site, size, grade, and stage of the tumor with interventional radiology playing a significant role in some cases. This imaging review describes the role of a radiologist in the management of GIT NEN.

Epidemiology, Diagnosis, Staging and Multimodal Therapy of Esophageal and Gastric Tumors

Gastric and esophageal tumors are diverse neoplasms that involve mucosal and submucosal tissue layers and include squamous cell carcinomas, adenocarcinomas, spindle cell neoplasms, neuroendocrine tumors, marginal B cell lymphomas, along with less common tumors. The worldwide burden of esophageal and gastric malignancies is significant, with esophageal and gastric cancer representing the ninth and fifth most common cancers, respectively. The approach to diagnosis and staging of these lesions is multimodal and includes a combination of gastrointestinal endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasound, and cross-sectional imaging. Likewise, therapy is multidisciplinary and combines therapeutic endoscopy, surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic chemotherapeutic tools. Future directions for diagnosis of esophageal and gastric malignancies are evolving rapidly and will involve advances in endoscopic and endosonographic techniques including tethered capsules, optical coherence tomography, along with targeted cytologic and serological analyses.

Immunohistochemical expression of chemokine receptor in neuroendocrine neoplasms (CXCR4) of the gastrointestinal tract: a retrospective study of 71 cases

AIM

C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) is expressed in many tumor entities, including gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms (GI-NENs). However, the role of CXCR4 expression in GI-NENs has been less studied. Our objective was to investigate the expression of CXCR4 in a series of GI-NENs with various clinical and pathological features.

METHODS

The immunohistochemical (IHC) expression of CXCR4 (clone UMB2) was examined in 71 GI-NENs and a semiquantitative immunoreactivity score (IRS) was calculated taking into consideration the intensity of the IHC reaction and the percentage of the tumor cells which showed positive expression. Results were compared with several clinical and pathological prognostic factors.

RESULTS

High CXCR4 expression was noted in 31 (43.7%) cases. Low IRS values were more frequent in NENs from the small intestine (66.7%) and stomach (60%). Also, all appendix tumors had IRS value of zero. High CXCR4 expression was noticed in 52.5% of liver metastases, compared to 40.4% primary tumors. A significant relationship was observed between the CXCR4 expression and the tumor grade (p=0.0216), and high IRS value was correlated with clinical stages III and IV (p=0.0142) and lympho-vascular invasion (p=0.0129). 74.1% of G1 neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) had a low IRS, G3 NETs showed minor differences between low (42.9%) and high (57.1%) expression and 66.7% of neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) presented high expression of CXCR4.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study highlighted that high CXCR4 expression is associated with high grade and advanced stage GI-NENs, as well as with metastatic cases. In these cases, high CXCR4 expression could serve as an important target for CXCR4 antagonists.

Histopathological Chromogranin A-Positivity Is Associated with Right-Sided Colorectal Cancers and Worse Prognosis

Simple Summary

Several factors are known to affect colorectal cancer (CRC) patient survival, including elevated platelet counts (thrombocytosis) and chromogranin A-positive neuroendocrine-cell differentiation (CgA⁺). Thrombocytosis can occur due to biochemical changes caused by the tumor itself (known as paraneoplastic thrombocytosis) or due to the bleeding of the tumor (reactive thrombocytosis). Our effort was primarily focused on (1) determining if CgA⁺ and paraneoplastic thrombocytosis combined can affect CRC and (2) finding out if there is a possible connection between the two. With the help of chromogranin A immunohistochemical staining, the measurement of circulating biochemical markers of paraneoplastic thrombocytosis (interleukin-6 and thrombopoietin) and chromogranins A and -B, indication was found that CRC combined with CgA⁺ has a well-distinguishable pathophysiology, compared to CRCs without CgA⁺. A possible, new subtype of CRC is proposed, which can be identified easily with chromogranin A immunohistochemical staining. However, its impact should be further studied.

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is known to be affected by paraneoplastic thrombocytosis and chromogranin A-positive neuroendocrine-cell differentiation (CgA⁺). Their combined effect has never been previously investigated. Methods: A prospective cohort pilot study of 42 CRC patients and 42 age- and sex-matched controls was carried out. Plasma interleukin-6, thrombopoietin, and serum chromogranin A and -B were measured; furthermore, tumor tissue was immunohistochemically stained for CgA⁺. Results: Twenty-seven and 15 patients were assigned to the chromogranin A-negative (CgA⁻) and CgA⁺ groups, respectively. Within the CgA⁺ group, right-sided tumors were more frequent (18.5% vs. 53.3%), no stage I cancer was found, and patients of this group were in worse general condition. Compared to control subjects, chromogranin A level was higher in the CgA⁺ group (p = 0.0086), thrombopoietin (p = 0.0040) and chromogranin B (p = 0.0070) in the CgA⁻ group, while interleukin-6 was high in both tumor groups (p ≤ 0.0090). Survival was significantly worse in the CgA⁺ group (hazard ratio: 5.73; p = 0.0378). Conclusions: Different thrombopoietin levels indicated distinct thrombocytosis types. Within the two CRC groups, serum levels of chromogranins changed in different directions suggesting two well-distinguishable pathophysiologies. Based on these observations we propose a new subtype of CRC, which can be characterized by chromogranin A-positive neuroendocrine-cell differentiation.

Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors in 2020

Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors are rare slow-growing tumors with distinct histological, biological, and clinical characteristics that have increased in incidence and prevalence within the last few decades. They contain chromogranin A, synaptophysin and neuron-specific enolase which are necessary for making a diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumor. Ki-67 index and mitotic index correlate with cellular proliferation. Serum chromogranin A is the most commonly used biomarker to assess the bulk of disease and monitor treatment and is raised in both functioning and non-functioning neuroendocrine tumors. Most of the gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors are non-functional. World Health Organization updated the classification of neuroendocrine tumors in 2017 and renamed mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma into mixed neuroendocrine neoplasm. Gastric neuroendocrine tumors arise from enterochromaffin like cells. They are classified into 4 types. Only type I and type II are gastrin dependent. Small intestinal neuroendocrine tumor is the most common small bowel malignancy. More than two-third of them occur in the terminal ileum within 60 cm of ileocecal valve. Patients with small intestinal neuroendrocrine tumors frequently show clinical symptoms and develop distant metastases more often than those with neuroendocrine tumors of other organs. Duodenal and jejuno-ileal neuroendocrine tumors are distinct biologically and clinically. Carcinoid syndrome generally occurs when jejuno-ileal neuroendocrine tumors metastasize to the liver. Appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors are generally detected after appendectomy. Colonic neuroendocrine tumors generally present as a large tumor with local or distant metastasis at the time of diagnosis. Rectal neuroendocrine tumors are increasingly being diagnosed since the implementation of screening colonoscopy in 2000. Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors are diagnosed and staged by endoscopy with biopsy, endoscopic ultrasound, serology of biomarkers, imaging studies and functional somatostatin scans. Various treatment options are available for curative and palliative treatment of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors.

Differential Diagnosis and Management of Diarrhea in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors

Diarrhea is a recurrent symptom in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and can represent different etiologies; thus, differential diagnosis is challenging. This paper distinguishes the different causes of chronic diarrhea in patients with gastroenteropancreatic NETs, with the aim to identify the most appropriate therapeutic approach. Underlying causes of diarrhea can be multifactorial, including not only diarrhea that is related to specific hormonal hypersecretory syndromes, but also diarrhea that is secondary to the following: extensive surgery which can cause pancreatic exocrine insufficiency or short bowel syndrome, treatment with somatostatin analogs or other antineoplastic agents, and bile acid malabsorption. After initial management of diarrhea with general treatments (dietary modification, use of antidiarrheals), a proper differential diagnosis is necessary to treat patients with specific etiology-driven therapeutic approaches, such as somatostatin analogs, pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy, and tryptophan hydroxylase inhibitors. In conclusion, NETs should be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients suffering from chronic diarrhea, after the exclusion of more common etiologies. Furthermore, physicians should keep in mind that several different etiologies might be responsible for diarrhea occurrence in NET patients. A prompt diagnosis of the actual cause of diarrhea is necessary to guide the treatment and a multidisciplinary approach is mandatory.

A case report of an excellent response to interferon- α in a patient with functional metastasized neuroendocrine tumor refractory to other treatments

INTRODUCTION

Interferon alpha (IFNα) has been used for a long time in patients with functionally active neuroendocrine tumors (NET). However, due to the unfavorable toxicity profile of interferon, the perceived limited efficacy as well as the development of novel substances, IFNα is only used sparingly in the treatment of NET to date.

PATIENTS CONCERNS AND DIAGNOSIS

We describe the case of a 63-year-old male patient with highly differentiated, functional NET of the ileum and synchronous liver metastasis.

INTERVENTIONS

After failure of classical therapies including dose-intensified somatostatin analog treatment and palliative primary tumor resection, a therapy with pegylated IFNα2a (135 μg/wk) was initiated. Following this treatment, the patient fully recovered from signs of hypersecretion and demonstrated an impressive tumor response.

OUTCOMES

Thirty months after initiating IFNα, the patient is still free of clinical symptoms and shows a sustained tumor response. Notably, no relevant side effects were observed.

CONCLUSION

Our case report supports the use of IFNα in patients with functional NET refractory to classical treatments.

Primary malignant ovarian carcinoid; management and outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinicopathological characteristics and survival of patients with malignant ovarian carcinoid tumor (OC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The National Cancer Database was accessed and patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 with a OC who did not have a personal history of a tumor at another site were selected. Overall survival (OS) was assessed for patients who had ≥1 month of follow-up. OS rates were estimated following generation of Kaplan-Meier curves and compared with the log-rank test.

RESULTS

A total of 588 patients with a median age of 51.5 years were identified. The majority were White (71.6%), had unilateral tumors (94.2%) with a median size of 3.8 cm that were confined to the ovary (88%). Patients with early stage disease (n = 431) had excellent OS compared to those with advanced stage (II-IV) disease (n = 51), p < 0.001; 5-yr OS rates were 95.4% and 53.1% respectively. For patients with stage I disease, there was no difference in OS between those who did (n = 211) and did not (n = 175) have hysterectomy, p = 0.92. For patients with advanced stage disease, administration of adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with better survival, p = 0.093.

CONCLUSIONS

OCs are typically small, unilateral tumors confined to the ovary arising in perimenopausal patients. Survival outcomes are excellent for patients with early stage disease and unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy appears to be curative.

A proof-of-concept methodology to validate the in situ visualization of residual disease using cancer-targeted molecular agents in fluorescence-guided surgery

Introduction

The clinical need for improved intraoperative tumor visualization has led to the development of targeted contrast agents for fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS). A key characteristic of these agents is their high tumor specificity, which could enable detection of residual lesions that would likely be missed by visual inspection. Here, we examine the utility of a promising somatostatin receptor subtype-2 (SSTR2)-targeted fluorescent agent for detecting residual disease in mouse xenografts using FGS and post-operative histopathological validation.

Methods

Mice (n=2) implanted with SSTR2 overexpressing tumors were injected with 2 nmol of the dual-labeled somatostatin analog, ⁶⁷Ga-MMC(IR800)-TOC, and tumors were resected 48 h post-injection using traditional white light reflectance and palpation. Tumors underwent gamma counting and histopathology analysis. The wide-field FGS imaging platform (OnLume) was used to evaluate residual disease in situ under ambient light representative of an operating room.

Results

The tumor was resected with grossly negative margins using conventional inspection and palpation; however, additional in situ residual disease was found in the tumor cavity using FGS imaging. In situ fluorescent tumor contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were 3.0 and 5.2. Agent accumulation was 7.72 and 8.20 %ID/g in tumors and 0.27 and 0.20 %ID/g in muscle. Fluorescence pixel values and gamma counts were highly correlated (r = 0.95, P < 0.048). H&E and IHC staining confirmed cancer positivity and SSTR2-overexpression, respectively.

Conclusion

Our findings demonstrate that the use of clinically relevant fluorescence imaging instrumentation enhances the evaluation of promising FGS agents for in situ visualization of residual disease.