Acneiform eruption induced by molecularly targeted agents in antineoplastic therapy: A review

BACKGROUND

Various biologic agents targeting specific molecules present new treatment options for various tumors. Acneiform eruption is a very common skin reaction to these agents. Although not life-threatening, acneiform eruption can affect patients' emotional and social lives. In very exceptional cases, it can lead to cancer therapy interruption.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to review the incidence rate, clinical characteristics, pathogenesis, and current management of acneiform eruption induced by molecularly targeted agents.

METHODS

This review was carried out through PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane searching terms 'acneiform eruption', 'papulopustular eruption' or 'acne-like rash' and 'skin toxicity', 'cutaneous toxicity', 'skin reactions', 'dermatological toxicities', 'target therapy,' or 'drug therapy'.

RESULTS

Of the 73 articles matched our search terms, 61 were original articles and 12 were case reports or case series. Acneiform eruption is most commonly observed in patients treated with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors and mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitors. Typical lesions consist of erythematous papules and pustules without comedones, accompanying with burning, pruritus, or xerosis. The pathogenesis involves inflammation and abnormalities of the follicular epithelium, where a disorder in EGFR signaling plays a key role. The treatment of acneiform eruption depends on the severity of the rash.

CONCLUSIONS

Early recognition and effective management of this cutaneous adverse reaction can prevent unnecessary reduction and discontinuation of drug use and improve patient survival and quality of life. Close collaboration between oncologists and dermatologists is important to optimize therapy and improve patient survival.

Early experience with targeted therapy as a first-line adjuvant treatment for pediatric low-grade glioma

OBJECTIVE

Pediatric low-grade gliomas (pLGGs) frequently exhibit dysregulation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. Targeted therapies, including mutant BRAF inhibitors (dabrafenib) and MEK inhibitors (trametinib), have shown promise in patients in whom conventional chemotherapy has failed. However, few studies have investigated the use of targeted therapy as a first-line treatment for pLGG. Here, the authors reviewed their institutional experience with using a personalized medicine approach to patients with newly diagnosed pLGGs.

METHODS

All pediatric patients at the authors' institution who had been treated with dabrafenib or trametinib for pLGG without first receiving conventional chemotherapy or radiation were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic, clinical, and radiological data were collected.

RESULTS

Eight patients underwent targeted therapy as a first-line treatment for pLGG. Five patients had a BRAF alteration (1 with a BRAFV600E mutation, 4 with a KIAA1549:BRAF fusion), and 3 patients had an NF1 mutation. One of the 8 patients was initially treated with dabrafenib, and trametinib was added later. Seven patients were initially treated with trametinib; of these, 2 later transitioned to dual therapy, whereas 5 continued with trametinib monotherapy. Six patients (75%) demonstrated a partial response to therapy during their treatment course, whereas stable disease was identified in the remaining 2 patients (25%). One patient experienced mild disease progression after completing a course of trametinib monotherapy, but ultimately stabilized after a period of close observation. Another patient experienced tumor progression while on dabrafenib, but subsequently responded to dual therapy with dabrafenib and trametinib. The most common adverse reactions to targeted therapy were cutaneous toxicity (100%) and diarrhea (50%).

CONCLUSIONS

Targeted therapies have the potential to become a standard treatment option for pLGG due to their favorable toxicity profile and oral route of administration. This case series provides preliminary evidence that targeted therapies can induce an early disease response as a first-line adjuvant treatment; however, large-scale studies are required to assess long-term durability and safety.

Targeted therapy for pediatric low-grade glioma

PURPOSE

Pediatric low-grade gliomas are the most frequent brain tumors in children. The standard approach for symptomatic unresectable tumors is chemotherapy. Recently, key molecular alterations/pathways have been identified and targeted drugs developed and tested in clinical trials. We describe our institutional experience with MAPK pathway targeted therapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical reports of 23 patients diagnosed with PLGG and treated with either trametinib or dabrafenib at Hospital Sant Joan de Dèu (Barcelona, Spain). Patients with neurofibromatosis were excluded. Objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were determined using the Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology criteria in low-grade glioma. ORR was defined as the proportion of patients with the best overall response including complete remission (CR) or partial remission (PR). DCR was the sum of the CR, PR, and stable disease (SD) rates.

RESULTS

ORR with trametinib was 0% (95% CI, 0%-23.2%) and DCR was 78.6% (95% CI, 49.2%-95.3%). Eleven patients had SD and three patients presented PD. ORR with dabrafenib was 41.7% (95% CI, 16.5%-71.4%), including four CR and one patient with PR. DCR with dabrafenib was 100% (95% CI, 73.5%-100%); there were seven SD and none PD. Treatment was well tolerated. Only three patients, on trametinib, presented grade 3 adverse effects: leukocytoclastic vasculitis, cheilitis, and bone infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience adds to the growing data about the efficacy and tolerability of targeted therapy in patients with PLGG. When present, toxicity is mainly mild-moderate and transient. Ongoing prospective clinical trials are trying to address if its use should be advanced to first-line therapy.

Economic evaluation of adverse events of dabrafenib plus trametinib versus nivolumab in patients with advanced BRAF-mutant cutaneous melanoma for adjuvant therapy in Germany

Background: Adjuvant treatment options have become the standard therapy for stage III and IV resectable cutaneous melanoma. Two recent studies led to the registration of dabrafenib and trametinib as targeted therapies for BRAF-mutated melanoma, and of immunotherapy with nivolumab irrespective of BRAF-mutation status. Both therapies have different spectrums of adverse events. Objective: To estimate the financial impact of side effects from the perspective of the German statutory sick funds to compare both therapeutic options and to relate the burden to the overall costs of the treatment.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

Thirty-six adverse event categories for the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib ('combi treatment') and for nivolumab were extracted from the original publications of the studies named COMBI-AD and CheckMate 238.

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION

For all event categories a diagnosis and therapy recommendation were determined according to current national or international guidelines or from leading German textbooks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The resulting diagnostic steps, treatments, and therapies were evaluated with unit costs based on the German fee schedule for ambulatory physicians, the German G-DRG scheme, and the German drug price list.

RESULTS

The number of events with nivolumab per one hundred treatments amounted to 3.8 mandatory hospitalizations, 3.5 emergency care events and 0.8 life-threatening events. For the combi treatment, the respective number of events per one hundred treatments was 2.7, 1.8, and 0.5. The overall cost burden was calculated as €899 for nivolumab and €861 for combi-treatment.

CONCLUSION

The treatment of adverse events resulting from adjuvant melanoma therapy showed comparable costs for both therapies.

The suppressive effect of dabrafenib, a therapeutic agent for metastatic melanoma, in IgE-mediated allergic inflammation

The functional inhibition of mast cells, which serve as a key effector cells in allergic reactions may be a specific target for treating immunoglobulin (Ig)E-mediated allergic reactions, which occur in various allergic diseases including anaphylaxis, asthma, and atopic dermatitis. In this study, we demonstrated the effects of dabrafenib, a therapeutic agent used to treat metastatic melanoma, with a focus on mast cell activation and local cutaneous anaphylaxis. In two types of mast cells (RBL-2H3 and mouse bone marrow-derived mast cells), dabrafenib (0.01, 0.1, 1 μM) pretreatment significantly decreased IgE-induced degranulation, intracellular calcium influx, and the activity of intracellular signaling molecules, such as Lyn, Syk, Akt, and PLCγ. Dabrafenib ameliorated mRNA and protein expression levels of interleukin-4 and tumor necrosis factor-α by the reduction of nuclear localization of nuclear factor-κB and nuclear factor of activated T-cells. In passive cutaneous anaphylaxis, oral administration of dabrafenib (0.1, 1, 10 mg/kg) reduced local pigmentation and ear thickness in a dose-dependent manner. Taken together, these results suggest that dabrafenib is a therapeutic drug candidate that controls IgE-mediated allergic inflammatory diseases through suppression of mast cell activity.

Drug eruptions: Great imitators

Drug eruptions are among the great masqueraders that sometimes cause diagnostic challenges in clinical practice. Pharmacologic agents may induce skin changes, sharing the same pathophysiologic mechanisms of specific dermatoses, or inducing drug eruptions with different pathologic mechanisms that have similar clinical presentations. The former conditions are usually called drug-induced skin diseases, whereas the latter conditions are termed "dermatosis-like drug eruptions." Both types are great imitators in dermatologic practice and can be easily misdiagnosed as other diseases or lead to unrecognized causative agents.

BRAF Inhibitor-Associated Granulomatous Dermatitis: A Report of 3 Cases

Cutaneous toxicities associated with BRAF inhibitor treatment in patients with metastatic melanoma have been well described. We present a rare association of granulomatous dermatitis in association with the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib. Three patients with metastatic melanoma all presented with asymptomatic papular eruptions 8-21 months into vemurafenib therapy. Skin biopsies confirmed the diagnosis of granulomatous dermatitis. Other causes of granulomatous dermatitis including infectious agents and sarcoid were excluded. Treatment with potent topical and oral steroids improved the eruptions, but only after the cessation of vemurafenib did all 3 cases of granulomatous dermatitis completely resolve within 2 weeks. It is important to recognize that this association, unlike most other BRAF inhibitor-related skin toxicities, can occur many months after commencement of therapy and that vemurafenib treatment can be continued without clinically significant adverse effects.

Cutaneous reactions to targeted therapies in children with CNS tumors: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

MAPK (RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK-MAP) and mTOR inhibitors are novel treatments for pediatric central nervous system (CNS) tumors. The literature on common cutaneous adverse reactions to these therapies is sparse in the pediatric population. The aim of this study was to describe common cutaneous adverse reactions to BRAF, MEK, and mTOR inhibitors in children with CNS tumors.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, patients younger than 21 years of age receiving BRAF, MEK, and mTOR inhibitor monotherapy for a CNS tumor were enrolled over a one-year period. Full body skin examination, photographs of dermatologic findings, and initial treatment recommendations were included at the initial visit, and follow-up skin examinations were recommended every three months.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients were enrolled in the study. Fifty percent (11/22) received trametinib, a MEK inhibitor, 27.3% (6/22) received dabrafenib, a BRAF inhibitor, and 22.7% (5/22) received everolimus, an mTOR inhibitor. Median age at visit was 11 years (range, 3-19). Median time from treatment initiation to skin examination was 4.5 months (range, 0-43). Ninety-six percent (21/22) of all patients had at least one skin reaction. The most common reactions across treatment groups included follicular/acneiform eruptions and xerosis. Two patients on MEK inhibitors and one patient on a BRAF inhibitor required therapy cessation due to severe cutaneous reactions.

CONCLUSIONS

Cutaneous reactions to targeted anticancer therapy in children are common, treatable, and rarely require drug dose reduction or discontinuation. Routine surveillance and early intervention may improve quality of life and facilitate continuation of life-saving therapy.