Effect of Nicotinamide in Skin Cancer and Actinic Keratoses Chemoprophylaxis, and Adverse Effects Related to Nicotinamide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Actinic Keratosis in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Medical Literature Review

Pharmacological immunosuppression in solid organ transplant recipients is a significant risk factor in the occurrence of actinic keratosis (AK) and later progression into squamous cell carcinomas (SCC). Treating clinical and preclinical lesions is mandatory in this group of patients due to the high changes of progression into SCC. On the other hand, prevention of AK should be considered because it plays a crucial role. Several studies have been published on immunocompetent patients, as well as on the management and prevention of AK, but not on immunosuppressed patients. This review aims to summarize the current knowledge on the management and prevention measures of AK in solid organ transplant recipients.

[Translated article] Actinic Keratosis in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Medical Literature Review

Pharmacological immunosuppression in solid organ transplant recipients is a significant risk factor in the occurrence of actinic keratosis (AK) and later progression into squamous cell carcinomas (SCC). Treating clinical and preclinical lesions is mandatory in this group of patients due to the high changes of progression into SCC. On the other hand, prevention of AK should be considered because it plays a crucial role. Several studies have been published on immunocompetent patients, as well as on the management and prevention of AK, but not on immunosuppressed patients. This review aims to summarize the current knowledge on the management and prevention measures of AK in solid organ transplant recipients.

Patients' willingness to accept adverse event and cost tradeoffs from oral nicotinamide for reduced risk of non-melanoma skin cancer

BACKGROUND

Non-immunosuppressed patients with a history of multiple non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) taking oral nicotinamide supplementation experienced a 23% decrease in annual NMSC risk in a randomized clinical trial. Patient preferences for risks and costs associated with nicotinamide are unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To understand how patients prioritize NMSC reduction, infection risk, and cost.

METHODS

A sample of adults with history of ≥2 NMSC within the past five years undergoing Mohs procedure completed a discrete-choice experiment comprising two hypothetical treatments-characterized by varying reductions in NMSC incidence, increased severe infection risk, and cost-and no treatment. The data were analyzed with random-parameters logit models.

RESULTS

A total of 203 subjects (mean age 71.5 years, 65.5% males) participated. For a 23% annual reduction in NMSC incidence, a 26% [95% CI: 8%-45%] annual increase in severe infection risk and $8 [95% CI: $2-14] monthly cost was acceptable. Outcomes across analyzed subgroups (before vs. during COVID pandemic, site of interview, less vs. more prior NMSCs) were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients were unwilling to accept high severe infection risks to obtain the reduction in NMSC incidence observed in a nicotinamide trial, suggesting that routinely recommending nicotinamide may run counter to some patients' preferences.

European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Part 1: Diagnostics and prevention-Update 2023

Invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is one of the most common cancers in white populations, accounting for 20% of all cutaneous malignancies. Overall, cSCC mostly has very good prognosis after treatment, with 5-year cure rates greater than 90%. Despite the overall favourable prognosis and the proportionally rare deaths, cSCC is associated with a high total number of deaths due to its high incidence. A collaboration of multidisciplinary experts from the European Association of Dermato-Oncology (EADO), the European Dermatology Forum (EDF), the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS), the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) and the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), was formed to update recommendations on cSCC, based on current literature and expert consensus. Part 1 of the guidelines addresses the updates on classification, epidemiology, diagnosis, risk stratification, staging and prevention in immunocompetent as well as immunosuppressed patients.

Clinical and economic burden of benign and malignant skin lesions in renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Studies evaluating the economic burden of dermatological care in the transplant setting are currently not available in Australia.

AIMS

To evaluate the clinical and economic burden of benign and malignant skin lesions in renal transplant recipients in Central Queensland.

METHODS

A bottom-up approach was used to determine the clinical burden and direct costs from patient-level Medicare data obtained from Service Australia for skin lesions.

RESULTS

Seventy-six percent of the renal transplant population in Central Queensland participated in this study. The median age was 57.0 years (standard deviation ± 13.6) and the majority (61.8%) of participants were men. The mean duration after transplant surgery was 99.9 months (interquartile range, 73.2-126.6 months). During a 2-year follow-up, 22 (40%) patients were diagnosed with benign skin lesions, 21 (38%) with nonmelanoma skin carcinoma (NMSC) and one (2%) with melanoma. There was a total of 231 visits to clinicians for diagnostic and therapeutic skin procedures and the direct costs to Medicare was $48 806 Australian Dollars (AUD) or $30 427 US Dollars (USD). Approximately 86% of the total direct costs was spent for nonNMSC and mean direct costs for NMSC was $763 AUD (or $476 USD).

CONCLUSION

This Medicare data-based study provides further insight into the burgeoning clinical and economic burden of the care for benign and malignant skin lesions in the renal transplantation setting in Australia.

Patient Perception of Skin Cancer Reduction by Nicotinamide Correlates With Use

Introduction Nicotinamide (Vitamin B3) has been shown to reduce the rate of non-melanoma skin cancers by 23%, yet most patients do not know that this supplement reduces skin cancer. Understanding patient beliefs about skin cancer reduction attributed to nicotinamide is important to appropriately counsel patients on oral supplement use and ultimately to prevent non-melanoma skin cancers. Objective The objective of this study was to determine the association between nicotinamide use and perceived efficacy in skin cancer reduction. Methods Patients who underwent Mohs surgery in 2019 were sent an online survey assessing nicotinamide use, efficacy compared to sunscreen, and perceived skin cancer risk reduction. Results Data from 50 surveys revealed a perceived risk reduction attributed to nicotinamide of 31.2% for basal cell carcinoma (BCC), 30.2% for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and 24.3% for melanoma. In the subset of respondents taking nicotinamide, the perceived risk reduction was significantly higher at 41.2% for BCC and 38.3% for SCC (p<0.05) and positively correlated with reported nicotinamide use (p<0.05). The perceived risk reduction of melanoma was not significantly increased in patients taking nicotinamide (31.6%); however, the perceived risk reduction was correlated with nicotinamide use (p<0.05). In addition, 15.6% of respondents believed that nicotinamide was more effective than sunscreen at preventing skin cancer. Conclusion A larger perceived reduction of non-melanoma skin cancers attributed to nicotinamide is associated with increased oral nicotinamide use. Better patient education regarding the reduction of skin cancers with oral nicotinamide will need to be implemented to change patients' perceptions of the value of nicotinamide.

Systemic Photoprotection in Melanoma and Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer

Non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs), which include basal cell carcinoma (BCC), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and actinic keratosis (AK), are the most common cancer diseases in the Caucasian race. If diagnosed late and improperly treated, BCC and SCC can become locally advanced and metastasize. Malignant melanoma (MM) is less frequent but more lethal than NMSC. Given the individual and social burdens of skin cancers, performing an adequate prevention is needed. Ultraviolet (UV) ray exposure is one of the main risk factors for skin cancer. Thus, the first-choice prevention strategy is represented by photoprotection that can be both topical and systemic. The latter consists of the oral administration of molecules which protect human skin against the damaging effects of UV rays, acting through antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, or immunomodulator mechanisms. Although several compounds are commonly used for photoprotection, only a few molecules have demonstrated their effectiveness in clinical trials and have been included in international guidelines for NMSC prevention (i.e., nicotinamide and retinoids). Moreover, none of them have been demonstrated as able to prevent MM. Clinical and preclinical data regarding the most common compounds used for systemic photoprotection are reported in this review, with a focus on the main mechanisms involved in their photoprotective properties.

Pharmacological Agents Used in the Prevention and Treatment of Actinic Keratosis: A Review

Actinic keratosis (AK) is among the most commonly diagnosed skin diseases with potentially life-threatening repercussions if left untreated. Usage of pharmacologic agents represents one of many therapeutic strategies that can be used to help manage these lesions. Ongoing research into these compounds continues to change our clinical understanding as to which agents most benefit particular patient populations. Indeed, factors such as past personal medical history, lesion location and tolerability of therapy only represent a few considerations that clinicians must account for when prescribing appropriate treatment. This review focuses on specific drugs used in either the prevention or treatment of AKs. Nicotinamide, acitretin and topical 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) continue to be used with fidelity in the chemoprevention of actinic keratosis, although some uncertainty persists in regard to which agents should be used in immunocompetent vs. immunodeficient/immunosuppressed patients. Topical 5-FU, including combination formulations with either calcipotriol or salicylic acid, as well as imiquimod, diclofenac and photodynamic light therapy are all accepted treatment strategies employed to target and eliminate AKs. Five percent of 5-FU is regarded as the most effective therapy in the condition, although the literature has conflictingly shown that lower concentrations of the drug might also be as effective. Topical diclofenac (3%) appears to be less efficacious than 5% 5-FU, 3.75-5% imiquimod and photodynamic light therapy despite its favorable side effect profile. Finally, traditional photodynamic light therapy, while painful, appears to be of higher efficacy in comparison to its more tolerable counterpart, daylight phototherapy.

Advances in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Management

Simple Summary

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is an increasingly prevalent and morbid cancer worldwide. Management of this cancer has changed significantly in the last decade through improved risk stratification and new therapies offering patients with locally advanced and metastatic disease more effective, less toxic, and more durable treatment options. Ongoing clinical trials are assessing new therapeutic options as well as optimizing existing regimens in efforts to better manage this cancer. The recent developments highlight the need for multidisciplinary care, especially for those with locally advanced and metastatic disease.

Abstract

cSCC is increasing in prevalence due to increased lifespans and improvements in survival for conditions that increase the risk of cSCC. The absolute mortality of cSCC exceeds melanoma in the United States and approaches that of melanoma worldwide. This review presents significant changes in the management of cSCC, focusing on improvements in risk stratification, new treatment options, optimization of existing treatments, and prevention strategies. One major breakthrough in cSCC treatment is the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), which have ushered in a renaissance in the treatment of patients with locally advanced and metastatic disease. These agents have offered patients with advanced disease decreased therapeutic toxicity compared to traditional chemotherapy agents, a more durable response after discontinuation, and improved survival. cSCC is an active field of research, and this review will highlight some of the novel and more developed clinical trials that are likely to impact cSCC management in the near future.