Effect of monthly intravenous cyclophosphamide in rapidly deteriorating multiple sclerosis patients resistant to conventional therapy

Cyclophosphamide treatment in active multiple sclerosis

OBJECTIVE

Cyclophosphamide (CYC) is an alkylating agent with immunosuppressive effect by inhibiting DNA synthesis and producing apoptosis used in many autoimmune diseases, including multiple sclerosis (MS). Here, we analyze the efficacy of CYC treatment in relapsing-remitting (RRMS) and active secondary progressive MS (SPMS) in our center with a monthly scheme.

METHODS

Patients with MS treated with CYC and a follow up of at least 36 months were eligible for inclusion. All participants had received a standard CYC regimen. The EDSS score mean annualized relapse rate (ARR) and progression index (PI) were measured as efficacy outcomes at 12, 24, and 36 months. Outcomes were also analyzed comparing disease course and activity.

RESULTS

A total of 16 patients were included (50% male, 18.75% RRMS and 81.25% SPMS). EDSS remained stable along the follow-up period, with 62.5% improving or maintaining the same EDSS score at 12 months. PI decreased 14% and 21% at 12 and 24-36 months of follow-up, respectively. ARR decreased 20% after 12 months, 19% after 24 months, and 30.23% after 36 months. Median differences in ARR were higher in patients with high relapse activity (0.60 vs 0.07, p = 0.001) and malignant course (0.60 vs 0.17, p = 0.027). PI also differed with higher mean differences in patients with high relapse activity (0.70 vs 0.03, p = 0.016) and malignant course (1.17 vs 0.03, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

CYC continues to be a valid therapeutic option, especially in regions with limited access to high-efficiency therapies particularly in patients with high relapsing activity and malignant course.

Cyclophosphamide in treatment of tumefactive multiple sclerosis

OBJECTIVE

. To review the Mayo clinic experience of cyclophosphamide in the treatment of tumefactive Multiple Sclerosis (TMS).

METHODS

. Retrospective chart review was performed to identify patients with TMS who did not respond to corticosteroid and plasma exchange and were treated with cyclophosphamide. Demographic, clinical, treatment, and outcome parameters were collected.

RESULTS

. We identified 12 patients with TMS who were treated with cyclophosphamide. Median follow-up was 17 (range 1-72) months after cyclophosphamide administration. The tumefactive attack was the first clinical symptom in 5/12 patients. The median age at index attack onset was 36 (range 22-57). The median age at the first demyelinating attack was 29.3 (range 20-55). The most common clinical presentation at the index attack was the visual disturbance, followed by motor symptoms. The index attack was accompanied by headache in 5/12 patients. Median attack related Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score was 6 (range 3-9.5), which improved to 5.25 (range 1-10) after treatment with cyclophosphamide. All patients were treated with corticosteroids and plasma exchange prior to treatment with cyclophosphamide. EDSS score improved in 8/12 patients and targeted neurological deficits improved to a moderate or marked degree in 9/12 patients after cyclophosphamide administration. The number of gadolinium enhancing lesions decreased in 10/12 and 8/12 patients had lack of disease activity (no new T2 or GAD lesions) in a median (range) time of 11 months (1-16) after the last dose of cyclophosphamide.

CONCLUSION

. Cyclophosphamide could be an effective option for the treatment of TMS, refractory to corticosteroids and plasmapheresis, and is associated with improvement of clinical and radiological disease activity.

The clinical features of combined central and peripheral demyelination in Chinese patients

BACKGROUND

Combined central and peripheral demyelination (CCPD) is rare and has never been reported as a spectrum disease in Han Chinese population.

OBJECTIVES

To study the clinical features of CCPD in Han Chinese patients.

METHODS

Twenty-two CCPD patients were selected from 788 demyelination cases. We reviewed and compared the clinical manifestation, laboratory data, electrophysiological examination, MRI and the prognosis.

RESULTS

CCPD patients presented with sensory disturbance (86.4%), plegia (77.3%), cranial nerve involvement (77.3%), abnormal deep tendon reflexes (72.7%). CSF data showed increased CSF protein in 81% patients. Oligoclonal IgG bands (OB) were negative. Cortical or juxtacortical, periventricular, infratentorial lesions, thoracic and cervical spinal cord were mostly affected. Visual evoked potentials indicated optic nerves demyelinating in 50% cases. 21 CCPD patients were treated with intravenous immunoglobulin or steroids or both of them, and the efficacy was 33.3%, 54.5%, 71.4%, respectively. One case that showed no response to steroids plus intravenous immunoglobulin treatment was improved significantly after using cyclophosphamide.

CONCLUSIONS

CCPD is a spectrum disease that can't be regarded as a simple combination of MS and CIDP. A suspected CCPD should receive brain and spinal MRI as well as electrophysiological examination to obtain a precise diagnosis.

The Assessment for Disinvestment of Intramuscular Interferon Beta for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in Brazil

In Brazil, inclusion and exclusion of health technologies within the Unified Health System (SUS) is the responsibility of the National Committee for Health Technology Incorporation (CONITEC). A recent Cochrane systematic review demonstrated that intramuscular interferon beta 1a (IFN-β-1a-IM) was inferior to the other beta interferons (IFN-βs) for multiple sclerosis (MS). As a result, CONITEC commissioned an analysis to review possible disinvestment within SUS. The objective of this paper is to describe the disinvestment process for IFN-β-1a-IM in Brazil. The first assessment comprised a literature review and mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis. The outcome of interest was the proportion of relapse-free patients in 2 years. This analysis confirmed the inferiority of IFN-β-1a-IM. Following this, CONITEC recommended disinvestment, with the decision sent for public consultation. More than 3000 contributions were made on CONITEC's webpage, most of them against the preliminary decision. As a result, CONITEC commissioned a study to assess the effectiveness of IFN-β-1a-IM among Brazilian patients in routine clinical care. The second assessment involved an 11-year follow-up of a non-concurrent cohort of 12,154 MS patients developed by deterministic-probabilistic linkage of SUS administrative databases. The real-world assessment further demonstrated that IFN-β-1a-IM users had a statistically higher risk of treatment failure, defined as treatment switching or relapse treatment or death, with the assessment showing that IFN-β-1a-IM was inferior to the other IFN-βs and to glatiramer acetate in both direct and indirect analysis. In the drug ranking with 40,000 simulations, IFN-β-1a-IM was the worst option, with a success rate of only 152/40,000. Following this, CONITEC decided to exclude the intramuscular presentation of IFN-β from the current MS treatment guidelines, giving patients who are currently on this treatment the option of continuing until treatment failure. In conclusion, we believe this is the first example of this new disinvestment process in action, providing an exemplar for other treatments in Brazil as well as other countries.

Multiple Sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic disease of the central nervous system (CNS) characterized by loss of motor and sensory function that results from immune-mediated inflammation, demyelination, and subsequent axonal damage.

Clinically, most MS patients experience recurrent episodes (relapses) of neurological impairment, but in most cases (60–80%) the course of the disease eventually becomes chronic and progressive, leading to cumulative motor, sensory, and visual disability, and cognitive deficits.

The course of the disease is largely unpredictable and its clinical presentation is variable, but its predilection for certain parts of the CNS, which includes the optic nerves, the brain stem, cerebellum, and cervical spinal cord, provides a characteristic constellation of signs and symptoms. Several variants of MS have been nowadays defined with variable immunopathogenesis, course and prognosis. Many new treatments targeting the immune system have shown efficacy in preventing the relapses of MS and have been introduced to its management during the last decade.

[Cell depletion and myoablation for neuroimmunological diseases]

BACKGROUND

The treatment of autoimmune disorders of the nervous system is based on interventions for the underlying immune phenomena.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize concepts of cell depletion and myeloablation studied in the context of neuroimmunological disorders.

METHOD

Evaluation of the available literature on multiple sclerosis as the most widely studied neuroimmunological entity.

RESULTS

Three concepts have been introduced: classical immunosuppressants, such as azathioprine, mitoxantrone and cyclophosphamide exert general lymphopenic effects and thereby moderately decrease disease activity. Myeloablative regimens combined with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation have a profound and in most cases long-lasting impact on autoimmunity at the cost of potentially life-threatening side effects. Alemtuzumab (anti-CD52), rituximab and ocrelizumab (both anti-CD20) are depleting antibodies directed against certain lymphocyte subsets and substantially ameliorate disease activity in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Ocrelizumab also shows efficacy in the primary progressive form of multiple sclerosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Most of the presented cell-depleting and myeloablative therapies are highly effective treatment options but are also accompanied by significant risks. In the context of the increasing number of alternative immunomodulatory options the indications for use should be cautiously considered.

Aggressive multiple sclerosis: proposed definition and treatment algorithm

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a CNS disorder characterized by inflammation, demyelination and neurodegeneration, and is the most common cause of acquired nontraumatic neurological disability in young adults. The course of the disease varies between individuals: some patients accumulate minimal disability over their lives, whereas others experience a rapidly disabling disease course. This latter subset of patients, whose MS is marked by the rampant progression of disability over a short time period, is often referred to as having 'aggressive' MS. Treatment of patients with aggressive MS is challenging, and optimal strategies have yet to be defined. It is important to identify patients who are at risk of aggressive MS as early as possible and implement an effective treatment strategy. Early intervention might protect patients from irreversible damage and disability, and prevent the development of a secondary progressive course, which thus far lacks effective therapy.

Glatiramer acetate in multiple sclerosis

Glatiramer acetate (Copaxone) is a disease-modifying agent approved by several health authorities worldwide for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Although its primary target is the inflammatory component of the disease, there are emerging pieces of evidence suggesting that glatiramer acetate might also have a neuroprotective effect. In this review, the results of glatiramer acetate clinical trials and other relevant studies as well as the place of glatiramer acetate among other approved disease-modifying treatments for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis are discussed critically.

Immunotherapy of multiple sclerosis: the state of the art

It is widely accepted that the main common pathogenetic pathway in multiple sclerosis (MS) involves an immune-mediated cascade initiated in the peripheral immune system and targeting CNS myelin. Logically, therefore, the therapeutic approaches to the disease include modalities aiming at downregulation of the various immune elements that are involved in this immunologic cascade. Since the introduction of interferons in 1993, which were the first registered treatments for MS, huge steps have been made in the field of MS immunotherapy. More efficious and specific immunoactive drugs have been introduced and it appears that the increased specificity for MS of these new treatments is paralleled by greater efficacy. Unfortunately, this seemingly increased efficacy has been accompanied by more safety issues. The immunotherapeutic modalities can be divided into two main groups: those affecting the acute stages (relapses) of the disease and the long-term treatments that are aimed at preventing the appearance of relapses and the progression in disability. Immunomodulating treatments may also be classified according to the level of the 'immune axis' where they exert their main effect. Since, in MS, a neurodegenerative process runs in parallel and as a consequence of inflammation, early immune intervention is warranted to prevent progression of relapses of MS and the accumulation of disability. The use of neuroimaging (MRI) techniques that allow the detection of silent inflammatory activity of MS and neurodegeneration has provided an important tool for the substantiation of the clinical efficacy of treatments and the early diagnosis of MS. This review summarizes in detail the existing information on all the available immunotherapies for MS, old and new, classifies them according to their immunologic mechanisms of action and proposes a structured algorithm/therapeutic scheme for the management of the disease.

Consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of multiple sclerosis

The diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) is dependent on the presence of clinical and paraclinical evidence demonstrating dissemination of central nervous system lesions in both space and time, as well as the exclusion of other disorders. Diagnostic criteria were originally promulgated in 1965 by the Schumacher committee and modified subsequently by the Poser committee to include paraclinical evidence. The most recent criteria are the 2010 modifications of the 2001 McDonald criteria, which are focused on making an earlier diagnosis of MS. This article provides guidelines, derived from clinical experience as well as evidence-based medicine, for the diagnosis and management of MS with special emphasis on practices in the Middle East.

Role of immunosuppressive therapy for the treatment of multiple sclerosis

Immunosuppressives have been used in multiple sclerosis (MS) since 1966. Today, we have many treatments for the relapsing forms of the disease, including 8 US Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies, with more soon to be introduced. Given the current treatment landscape what place do immunosuppressants have in combating MS? Trial work and our experience suggest that immunosuppressives still have an important role in treating MS. Cyclophosphamide finds use in treating patients with severe, inflammatory relapsing remitting MS or those suffering from a fulminant attack. We tend to employ mycophenolate mofetil as an add-on to injectable therapy for patients experiencing breakthrough activity. Some progressive (primary progressive multiple sclerosis or secondary progressive multiple sclerosis) patients may stabilize after treatment with either cyclophosphamide or mycophenolate. We rarely employ mitoxantrone because of potential cardiac or carcinogenic effects. We prefer to use cyclophosphamide or mycophenolate mofetil in preference to methotrexate because evidence of efficacy is limited for this drug. We have less experience with azathioprine, but it may be an alternative for patients with limited options who are unable to tolerate conventional therapies.

Escalating immunotherapy of multiple sclerosis

Basic disease-modifying treatment for relapsing forms of active multiple sclerosis (MS) is now available in many countries with high prevalence rates, for this chronic inflammatory disease of the central nervous system. Several lines of evidence support early immunomodulatory treatment with either recombinant interferon-beta or glatiramer acetate, and positive results from phase III trials encourage start of treatment even in patients with clinically isolated syndromes (CIS). However, currently available drugs for basic therapy are only partially effective and patients may still encounter relapses or disease progression. As treatment-refractory, clinically active MS can quickly lead to irreversible neurological disability there is an urgent need for effective escalating strategies. Patients with suboptimal treatment response to basic therapy have been treated with combination therapies, cytotoxic drugs (such as mitoxantrone and cyclophosphamide) or autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Recently, the monoclonal antibody, natalizumab, was added to this armamentarium. None of these strategies have been vigorously evaluated in large randomized, controlled phase III trials with patients who failed basic therapy. Therefore, the decision to escalate immunotherapy is still based on limited evidence. This article will review potential candidates for intensified immunosuppression and call for innovative study designs to better evaluate escalating immunotherapy in MS.

Cyclophosphamide in multiple sclerosis: scientific rationale, history and novel treatment paradigms

For patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), there are currently six approved medications that have been shown to alter the natural course of the disease. The approved medications include three beta interferon formulations, glatiramer acetate, natalizumab and mitoxantrone. Treating aggressive forms of RRMS and progressive disease forms of MS still presents a great challenge to neurologists. Intense immunosuppression has long been thought to be the only feasible therapeutic option. In patients with progressive forms of MS, lymphoid tissues have been detected in the central nervous system (CNS) that may play a critical role in perpetuating local inflammation. Agents that are currently approved for patients with MS have no or very limited bioavailability in the brain and spinal cord. In contrast, cyclophosphamide (CYC), an alkylating agent, penetrates the blood-brain barrier and CNS parenchyma well. However, while CYC has been used in clinical trials and off-label in clinical practice in patients with MS for over three decades, data on its efficacy in very heterogeneous groups of study patients have been conflicting. New myeloablative treatment paradigms with CYC may provide a therapeutic option in patients that do not respond to other agents. In this article we review the scientific rationale that led to the initial clinical trials with CYC. We will also outline the safety, tolerability and efficacy of CYC and provide neurologists with guidelines for its use in patients with MS and other inflammatory disorders of the CNS, including neuromyelitis optica (NMO). Finally, an outlook into relatively novel treatment approaches is provided.

High-dose chemotherapy and multiple sclerosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Immunomodulatory medications for multiple sclerosis provide only modest control of this potentially debilitating auto-immune disease of the central nervous system. The immunosuppression provided by high-dose chemotherapy has been studied to address treatment-refractory disease. In this review, we discuss the recent significant work in this field and its associated controversies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Conclusive evidence for the efficacy of high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell rescue is lacking given the lack of uniform patient populations and varying treatment protocols. Moreover, the significant toxicity associated with this procedure has dampened enthusiasm for its widespread use. High-dose chemotherapy without stem cell rescue has been trialed as a less toxic approach that eliminates the possibility of re-infusing autoreactive lymphocytes found in the stem cell product.

SUMMARY

Before high-dose chemotherapy with or without stem cell rescue can be adopted for clinical practice, both approaches require testing in randomized clinical trials. Both procedures have the possibility of decreasing disease activity but high-dose chemotherapy without stem cell rescue having a more favorable safety profile, may prove a more significant advance in the field of high-dose therapy for multiple sclerosis.

Definitions of breakthrough disease and second-line agents

Conventional disease-modifying agents are only moderately effective, so breakthrough disease activity is commonly seen. The evidence from randomized clinical trials and real-world observational data supporting the use of the second-line agents natalizumab, mitoxantrone, and cyclophosphamide are reviewed. Potential future treatment options are also discussed. Management algorithms for breakthrough disease are outlined.

Lights and shadows of cyclophosphamide in the treatment of multiple sclerosis

Cyclophosphamide (cy) is an alkylating agent used to treat malignancies and immune-mediated inflammatory nonmalignant processes. It has been used as a treatment in cases of worsening multiple sclerosis (MS). Cy is currently used for patients whose disease is not controlled by beta-interferon or glatiramer acetate as well as those with rapidly worsening MS. The most commonly used regimens involve outpatient IV pulse therapy given with or without corticosteroids every 4 to 8 weeks. Side effects include nausea, headache, alopecia, pain, male and women infertility, bladder toxicity, and risk of malignancy. Previous studies suggest that cy is effective in patients in the earlier stages of disease, where inflammation predominates over degenerative processes. Given that early inflammatory events appear to correlate with later disability, a major question is whether strong anti-inflammatory drugs, such as cy, will have an impact on later degenerative changes if given early in the disease to halt inflammation.

Chemotherapeutics in the treatment of multiple sclerosis

The likely pathogenic mechanisms of multiple sclerosis (MS) provide a sound rationale for investigating the efficacy of drugs possessing immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory properties. With proven efficacy, safety and tolerability, interferon beta formulations and glatiramer acetate have become the mainstay of initial treatment for patients with relapsing forms of MS. More recently, natalizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody (mAb) against the cellular adhesion molecule α4-integrin, has been employed for patients with an inadequate response or lack of tolerability to an alternate MS therapy, or as initial therapy for patients with severe disease. Various agents initially developed for oncological indications, either as chemotherapeutics or mAbs, may also have current or future uses in MS treatment. Mitoxantrone is currently the only chemotherapeutic agent approved for treatment of MS in the United States, while in parts of Europe azathioprine is approved and widely used for MS treatment. Other chemotherapeutics that have been tested in MS to date include cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, cladribine, and the mAbs alemtuzumab and rituximab. While there has been varying evidence of efficacy for these compounds, each appears to be associated with serious risks that require careful consideration and management. Given the risks that have been demonstrated for available chemotherapeutic agents and while long-term postmarketing safety data are still not available for those agents in development, it seems prudent to carefully assess the possible use of chemotherapeutics in the treatment of MS. A thorough risk-benefit analysis is becoming increasingly important in the assessment of therapeutic options for this disabling disease.

Benefits of glatiramer acetate in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis is a chronic, progressive disorder marked by repeated exacerbations that lead to increases in neurological disability. Glatiramer acetate and the IFN-betas are recommended as first-line agents for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis owing to their potential to reduce frequency and severity of relapses, decrease development of new brain lesions and delay permanent disability. After three decades of study, the preponderance of the evidence suggests that the efficacy of glatiramer acetate is similar to the IFN-betas and new data collected in more naturalistic settings suggest that it may provide improved quality of life, increased productivity and cost-effectiveness. This article will review this evidence including data from very recent head-to-head clinical trials and pharmacoeconomic analyses of cost-effectiveness.

Basic and escalating immunomodulatory treatments in multiple sclerosis: current therapeutic recommendations

This review updates and extends earlier Consensus Reports related to current basic and escalating immunomodulatory treatments in multiple sclerosis (MS). The recent literature has been extracted for new evidence from randomized controlled trials, open treatment studies and reported expert opinion, both in original articles and reviews, and evaluates indications and safety issues based on published data. After data extraction from published full length publications and critically weighing the evidence and potential impact of the data, the review has been drafted and circulated within the National MS Societies and the European MS Platform to reach consensus within a very large group of European experts, combining evidence-based criteria and expert opinion where evidence is still incomplete. The review also outlines a few areas of controversy and delineates the need for future research.

Intense immunosuppression in patients with rapidly worsening multiple sclerosis: treatment guidelines for the clinician

Several lines of evidence link immunosuppression to inflammation in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and provide a rationale for the increasing use of immunosuppressive drugs in the treatment of MS. Treatment-refractory, clinically active MS can quickly lead to devastating and irreversible neurological disability and treating these patients can be a formidable challenge to the clinician. Patients with refractory MS have been treated with intense immunosuppression, such as cyclophosphamide or mitoxantrone, or with autologous haematopoeitic stem cell transplants. Evidence shows that intense immunosuppression might be effective in patients who are unresponsive to immunomodulating therapy, such as interferon beta and glatiramer acetate. Natalizumab, a new addition to the armamentarium for treating MS, might also have a role in the treatment of this MS phenotype. This Review describes the use of intense immunosuppressant drugs and natalizumab in patients with rapidly worsening MS and provides clinicians with guidelines for the use of these drugs in this patient group.

Intravenous mitoxantrone and cyclophosphamide as second-line therapy in multiple sclerosis: An open-label comparative study of efficacy and safety

The study's aim was to compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous cyclophosphamide (CTX) and mitoxantrone (MITO) as second-line therapy in a clinical sample of active relapsing-remitting (RR) or secondary-progressive (SP) multiple sclerosis subjects. MITO was administered at a dosage of 8 mg/m(2) monthly for 3 months, then every 3 months, until a dosage of 120 mg/m(2) was reached. CTX was administered at a dosage of 700 mg/m(2) monthly for 12 months, then bimonthly for another 24 months. We used the Kaplan-Meier curves to assess time to the first relapse in RR and SP patients with relapses, and time to progression on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) in all the patients. MRI was assessed at baseline and after 12 months. Moreover, side effects were recorded. Seventy-five patients received MITO (31 RR, 44 SP) and 78 CTX (15 RR, 63 SP). The two groups differ only in terms of a significantly higher proportion of RR patients in the MITO group. After a mean follow-up of 3.6 years there was no significant difference in terms of time to the first relapse (MITO 2.6 years, CTX 2.5 years; p=0.50), whereas time to disease progression was slightly shorter in MITO than in CTX group (MITO 3.8 years, CTX 3.6 years; p=0.04). After 12 months of treatment, active MRI scans were reduced by 69% in MITO and 63% in CTX patients (p=0.10). Discontinuation due to side effects was more frequent in CTX patients. However, the overall tolerability profile was acceptable in both groups.

The safety profile of cyclophosphamide in multiple sclerosis therapy

Cyclophosphamide (Cyc) is an alkylating agent used to treat malignancies and autoimmune diseases, such as lupus nephritis, rheumatoid arthritis and immune-mediated neuropathies. Over the past 40 years, Cyc has also been applied to treat multiple sclerosis (MS) and the effective stabilisation of rapidly progressive forms of MS has been demonstrated in several studies. Cyc has a dose-dependent bimodal effect on the immune system. High doses have been demonstrated to induce an anti-inflammatory immune deviation (i.e., suppression of T helper 1 and enhancement of T helper 2 activity), affect CD4CD25(high) regulatory T cells and establish a state of marked immunosuppression. Data from the literature suggest that Cyc is particularly indicated in the treatment of young MS patients, suffering from a very active inflammatory disease characterised by frequent relapses and rapid accumulation of disability and displaying gadolinium-enhancing lesions on brain magnetic resonance. The most common Cyc-based therapeutic protocol applied in MS consists of monthly intravenous pulses for 1 year followed by bimonthly pulses for the second year, with or without prior infusion of corticosteroids. This protocol is usually well tolerated by the patients. Indeed, most of the side effects (mild alopecia, nausea and vomiting, cystitis) are dose dependent, transient and completely reversible. Definitive amenorrhoea is observed only in older female patients (aged > 40 years). Cyc has a safety and efficacy profile similar to that of mitoxantrone and can be used in patients whose disease is not controlled by IFN-beta or glatiramer acetate. Short course (6-12 months) of Cyc therapy can precede the initiation of immunomodulatory treatment in selected patients with an aggressive MS onset.

[CARIMS (Cancer Risk In Multiple Sclerosis) project: impact of long-term treatment]

Controversial results have been published on potential link between cancer and multiple sclerosis. Multiple sclerosis has been linked to reduced rates of cancer prior to the era of immunomodulating or immunosuppressive treatments and until today, only 9 studies can be found in the literature. New strategies and early use of IM or IS drugs in MS justify to study and follow patients to detect a potential increase of cancer's incidence in treated patients. It is important to follow and collect prospectively in MS centers, patients with history of cancer, to document histologies, and potential relations with repeated IM or IS treatments. A prospective study is in progress in French MS centers on behalf the Club Francophone de la SEP (CARIMS Project).

Cyclophosphamide for multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis is a presumed cell-mediated autoimmune disease of the central nervous system. Cyclophosphamide (CFX) is a cytotoxic and immunosuppressive agent, used in systemic autoimmune diseases. Controversial results have been reported on its efficacy in MS. We conducted a systematic review of all relevant trials, evaluating the efficacy of CFX in patients with progressive MS.

OBJECTIVES

The main objective was to determine whether CFX slows the progression of MS.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane MS Group Trials Register (searched June 2006), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 3 2006), MEDLINE (January 1966 to June 2006), EMBASE (January 1988 to June 2006) and reference lists of articles. We also contacted researchers in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the clinical effect of CFX treatment in patients affected by clinically definite progressive MS.CFX had to be administered alone or in combination with adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) or steroids. The comparison group had to be placebo or no treatment or the same co-intervention (ACTH or steroids)

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently decided the eligibility of the study, assessed the trial quality and extracted data. We also contacted study authors for original data.

MAIN RESULTS

Of the 461 identified references, we initially selected 70: only four RCTs were included for the final analysis. Intensive immunosuppression with CFX (alone or associated with ACTH or prednisone) in patients with progressive MS compared to placebo or no treatment (152 participants) did not prevent the long-term (12, 18, 24 months) clinical disability progression as defined as evolution to a next step of Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score. However, the mean change in disability (final disability subtracted from the baseline) significantly favoured the treated group at 12 (effect size - 0.21, 95% confidence interval - 0.25 to -0.17) and 18 months (- 0.19, 95% confidence interval - 0.24 to - 0.14) but favoured the control group at 24 months (0.14, CI 0.07 to 0.21). We were unable to verify the efficacy of other schedules. Five patients died; sepsis and amenorrhea frequently occurred in treated patients (descriptive analysis).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We were unable to achieve all of the objectives specified for the review. This review shows that the overall effect of CFX (administered as intensive schedule) in the treatment of progressive MS does not support its use in clinical practice.

Immunmodulatorische Stufentherapie der Multiplen Sklerose

The updated recommendations presented here reflect new developments in the diagnostic work-up and immunotherapy of multiple sclerosis (MS) as well as optimization of medical care for MS patients. Monoclonal antibodies provide considerable improvement of treatment, but their use in basic therapy is restricted by their side effect profile. Thus, for the time being, natalizumab is only approved for monotherapy after basic treatment has failed or for rapidly progressive relapsing-remitting MS. In contrast, long-term data on recombinant beta-interferons and glatiramer acetate (Copaxone) show that even after several years no unexpected side effects occur and that a prolonged therapeutic effect can be assumed which correlates with the dose or frequency of treatment. Recently IFN-beta1b (Betaferon) was approved for prophylactic treatment after the first attack (clinically isolated syndrome, CIS). During treatment with beta-interferons, neutralizing antibodies can emerge with possible loss of effectivity. In contrast, antibodies play no role in treatment with glatiramer acetate. During or after therapy with mitoxantrone, serious side effects (cardiomyopathy, acute myeloid leukemia) appeared in 0.2-0.4% of cases. Plasmapheresis is limited to individual curative attempts in escalating therapy of a severe attack. According to the revised McDonald criteria, the diagnosis of MS can be made as early as the occurrence of the first attack (CIS). Recommendations for optimized care of MS patients are also new, thus implementing a resolution of the European Parliament.

Treatment of children and adolescents with multiple sclerosis

The onset of multiple sclerosis is being increasingly recognized in children and adolescents. There are now approved immunomodulatory therapies for adults with multiple sclerosis. Treatment early in the disease course appears to have a greater impact on disease outcome, an issue of particular importance for children who face decades of multiple sclerosis disease activity. This review summarizes the multiple sclerosis therapies currently available, efficacy data available from studies of these medications in adults and limited information on the use of these medications in children. Future directions in multiple sclerosis therapeutics and specific issues relating to pediatric multiple sclerosis are discussed.

Mitoxantrone versus cyclophosphamide in secondary-progressive multiple sclerosis: a comparative study

Fifty secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) patients who had lost one or more EDSS points in the prior two years were selected to receive either cyclophosphamide (25 patients, 13 females, 12 males, F/M = 1.08; mean age: 42.4 years; mean disease duration: 13.3 years; mean EDSS at study entry: 5.7) or mitoxantrone (25 patients, 14 females, 11 males, F/M = 1.27; mean age: 38.2 years; mean disease duration: 11.5 years; mean EDSS at study entry: 5.5). SPMS patients were treated for two years with clinical evaluation (relapse rate, disability progression) every three months and radiological imaging (conventional magnetic resonance imaging) before therapy initiation and at the end of the first and second years of therapy. Safety profile and costs of the two therapeutic protocols were also analysed. In terms of clinical and radiological measures the drugs exerted a quite identical effect on both, and produced a significant reduction in both relapse rate (mitoxantrone Mito): p = 0.001, cyclophosphamide (Cy): p = 0.003) and disability progression (Mito: p = 0.01; Cy: p = 0.01). Subgroups of mitoxantrone- and cyclophosphamide-responding patients were identified (14/25 and 17/25, respectively) and were characterized by a significantly shorter duration of the secondary progressive phase of the disease. In these subgroups, the improvement in the EDSS score at the end of therapy was highly significant (p<0.0001 for Mito, p = 0.0004 for Cy). The safety profiles of both drugs were acceptable; however, the Cy-based therapy protocol was significantly less expensive. We conclude that Cy should be considered as a therapeutic option in rapidly deteriorating SPMS patients.

A randomized blinded trial of combination therapy with cyclophosphamide in patients-with active multiple sclerosis on interferon beta

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with pulse cyclophosphamide given with methylprednisolone (MP) and interferon beta (IFNbeta)-Ia in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients with active disease during IFNbeta monotherapy.

METHODS

This was a randomized, single-blind, parallel-group, multicenter trial in MS patients with a history of active disease during IFNbeta treatment. Patients were randomized to either cyclophosphamide 800 mg/m2 plus methylprednisolone 1 g IV (CY/MP) or methylprednisolone once a month for six months and then followed for an additional 18 months. All patients received three days of methylprednisolone 1 g IV at screening and 30 mcg IFNbeta-Ia IM weekly for the entire 24 months. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in the mean number of gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+) lesions. Secondary clinical endpoints included time to treatment failure.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients were randomized to treatment: 30 to CY/MP and 29 to MP Change from baseline in the number of Gd+ lesions was significantly different between treatment groups at three (P =0.01), six (P =0.04) and 12 months (P =0.02), with fewer lesions in the CY/MP group. The cumulative rate of treatment failure was significantly lower in the CY/MP group compared with the MP group (rate ratio =0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.75; P =0.011). CY/MP treatment was well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Combination therapy with CY/MP and IFNbeta-Ia decreased the number of Gd+ lesions and slowed clinical activity in patients with previously active disease on IFNbeta alone.

The combination of cyclophosphamide plus interferon beta as rescue therapy could be used to treat relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients-- twenty-four months follow-up

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of the combination of cyclophosphamide (CTX) and interferon beta (IFN beta) in a group of relapsing remitting (RR) multiple sclerosis (MS) patients who experienced treatment failure during IFN beta therapy. It is the general experience that immunomodulatory agents (IMA) are only partially effective in RR patients. Recent data on the efficacy of immunosuppressive therapies for these patients are encouraging. The anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects of CTX have been utilized to treat selected cases of multiple sclerosis with a progressive and worsening course as rescue therapy. Thirty RR MS patients with clinically defined MS who experienced treatment failure during IFN beta therapy (2 or more relapses per year or 1.5 EDSS point worsening in one year) were enrolled in the study and treated with CTX iv pulse therapy added to IFN beta and followed up for 24 months. As primary endpoints we evaluated the yearly relapse rate. We also evaluated the percentage of patients free of relapses and of EDSS variations. We analysed the results at one year before entry (T0: IFN beta alone), 12 (T1) and 24 (T2) months after entry. Brain MRI was performed at T0, at T1 and T2. The 30 RR patients who had experienced a high number of relapses (rr =1.4) at T0 showed a significant improvement in yearly relapse rate (rr = 0.4) at T1 and a further improvement (rr = 0.17) at T2 (p < 0.001). The percentage of patients free of relapse was 70% at T2 (p < 0.0001). EDSS score changed from 2.6+/-1.23 at T0 to 2.2 +/- 1.5 at T2, showing only a trend of improvement. No significant variation of MRI lesion load and no severe adverse events were recorded during the study. These data showed that the combination of CTX plus IFN beta halted the progression of disease in active and deteriorating MS patients suggesting the necessity of RCTs to test the efficacy of this combination therapy in active RRMS patients or in patients who experienced treatment failure in response to disease modifying drugs (DMDs).

Stabilization of rapidly worsening multiple sclerosis for 36 months in patients treated with interferon beta plus cyclophosphamide followed by interferon beta

Cyclophosphamide (CTX) is an alkylating agent related to nitrogen mustards whose anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects have been utilised to treat selected cases of multiple sclerosis with a progressive and worsening course. To halt the progression of disease in patients refractory to disease modifying drugs CTX has been given, and several open-label studies have recently shown clinical benefits. In a previous study we demonstrated the effectiveness of a combination of IV monthly pulses of CTX and interferon beta (IFN-beta) in 10 patients with "rapidly transitional" form of multiple sclerosis characterised by severe and frequent attacks and rapid progression of disability. The present study reports the clinical and MRI follow-up 36 months after the discontinuation of CTX showing the maintenance of the results obtained in relapse rate (p<0.001), EDSS (p<0.001), T2 MRI total lesion load (p<0.001) and T2 lesions number (p<0.001) compared to the pre-treatment period. These encouraging findings and the absence of significant recorded side effects affirm that the association of CTX plus interferon-beta is amenable, safe and can be recommended in rapidly worsening MS patients.

Escalating immunotherapy of multiple sclerosis--new aspects and practical application

Recent clinical studies in multiple sclerosis (MS) provide new data on the treatment of clinically isolated syndromes, on secondary progression, on direct comparison of immunomodulatory treatments and on dosing issues. All these studies have important implications for the optimized care of MS patients. The multiple sclerosis therapy consensus group (MSTCG) critically evaluated the available data and provides recommendations for the application of immunoprophylactic therapies. Initiation of treatment after the first relapse may be indicated if there is clear evidence on MRI for subclinical dissemination of disease. Recent trials show that the efficacy of interferon beta treatment is more likely if patients in the secondary progressive phase of the disease still have superimposed bouts or other indicators of inflammatory disease activity than without having them. There are now data available, which suggest a possible dose-effect relation for recombinant beta-interferons. These studies have to be interpreted with caution, as some potentially important issues in the design of these studies (e. g. maintenance of blinding in the clinical part of the study) were not adequately addressed. A meta-analysis of selected interferon trials has been published challenging the value of recombinant IFN beta in MS. The pitfalls of that report are discussed in the present review as are other issues relevant to treatment including the new definition of MS, the problem of treatment failure and the impact of cost-effectiveness analyses. The MSTCG panel recommends that the new diagnostic criteria proposed by McDonald et al. should be applied if immunoprophylactic treatment is being considered. The use of standardized clinical documentation is now generally proposed to facilitate the systematic evaluation of individual patients over time and to allow retrospective evaluations in different patient cohorts. This in turn may help in formulating recommendations for the application of innovative products to patients and to health care providers. Moreover, in long-term treated patients, secondary treatment failure should be identified by pre-planned follow-up examinations, and other treatment options should then be considered.

Immunosuppressive treatment in multiple sclerosis

Immunosuppressive therapy has been used to treat multiple sclerosis (MS) for over 30 years based on the hypothesis that MS is a T cell-mediated autoimmune disease. The most commonly used immunosuppressive agents in MS are azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and mitoxantrone. Since the interferons and glatiramer acetate have become widely used in MS, immunosuppressive agents have found a role given as combination therapy or as monotherapy in instances where the interferons and glatiramer acetate are not effective in controlling the disease. Like the interferons and glatiramer acetate, immunosuppressive drugs are most efficacious in stages of MS that have an inflammatory component as evidenced by relapses and/or gadolinium-enhancing lesions on MRI or in patients in earlier stages of disease where inflammation predominates over degenerative processes in the CNS. There is no evidence of efficacy in primary progressive MS or later stages of secondary progressive MS. In our studies of cyclophosphamide, we have found that although it is a general immunosuppressant that affects both T cell and B cell functions, cyclophosphamide has selective immune effects in MS by suppressing IL-12- and Th1-type responses and enhancing Th2/Th3 responses (IL-4, IL-10, TGF-beta; eosinophils in peripheral blood). Cyclophosphamide and mitoxantrone are the most common immunosuppressive drugs used in patients with rapidly worsening MS whose disease is not controlled by beta-interferon or glatiramer acetate.

The argument against the use of cyclophosphamide and mitoxantrone in the treatment of multiple sclerosis

Mitoxantrone (MITX) and cyclophosphamide (CPM) are potent immunosuppressive agents with efficacy in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). Both agents appear effective in those patients with active inflammatory disease but are probably less effective in patients with a secondary progressive (SP) course dominated by a degenerative component. Given these agents are effective patients with active inflammation the question arises as to whether they are more effective than high dose interferon therapy. Interferon beta administered at high dose and high frequency suppresses enhancing lesions by as much as 90% and brings about a 35% decrease in relapse rates in addition to decreasing the progression of disability. Interferons have an excellent safety profile even after years of administration. What then is the advantage of immunosuppressive agents such as cyclophosphamide and mitoxantrone over safer and still effective treatments? The answer lies in the magnitude of effect in those with the most active and aggressive disease states. While interferons are safe and effective in those with mild or moderate inflammatory disease states, they are probably not sufficient to bring about control in disease that is highly active and resilient. Both mitoxantrone and cyclophosphamide have the ability to suppress inflammation that may be resistant to therapy with more conservative agents. Given the safety profile of these agents their use should be restricted to those patients with aggressive disease resistant to treatment with more conservative agents.

Pediatric multiple sclerosis

The onset of multiple sclerosis (MS) in childhood is being increasingly recognized. Despite this, there currently exist several barriers to the prompt diagnosis of MS in children. Many clinicians view MS as an exclusively adult-onset disease, and thus they may not entertain the diagnosis in a child. Also, the clinical and radiographic criteria for the diagnosis of MS have not been validated in a pediatric MS population. The available literature, as well as experience gained in a dedicated pediatric MS clinic, is used here to describe features of pediatric MS and contrast these with adult MS. The rationale and importance of future studies in pediatric MS is highlighted.

Pharmacological methods to overcome IFN-beta antibody formation in the treatment of multiple sclerosis

Diminished efficacy in terms of clinical relapses and lesion load on magnetic resonance images for patients developing neutralising antibodies (NAbs) to recombinant IFN-beta may be found in multiple sclerosis. NAbs become detectable over the first few years of therapy, disappearing during the treatment course in some patients and persisting longer in some others. Therefore, the administration of concomitant therapies to recombinant IFNbeta to prevent the formation of NAbs could be indicated mainly in the latter group of patients at the early stage of the treatment. Among those therapies, steroids meet the best criteria in terms of either safety or impact on the development of NAbs, at the present time.

High-dose cyclophosphamide in multiple sclerosis patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation

High-dose cyclophosphamide (CTX) is commonly used in preparation for autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation. CTX is a pro-drug, which undergoes complex oxidative metabolism with the metabolites being eliminated both renally and hepatically. In the following study, we evaluated the pharmacokinetic characteristics of high-dose CTX in three patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation for multiple sclerosis. The plasma concentration-time profiles for CTX and its hydroxy-metabolite were similar in multiple sclerosis patients to those reported in cancer patients undergoing stem cell transplantation. There was an increase in drug clearance after the second CTX dose indicating that the drug induced its own metabolism consistent with reports in other populations receiving high-dose CTX. One of the three patients cleared the drug slowly but this was not associated with greater toxicity. The patient with the slow clearance value and therefore highest drug exposure had stable disability scores at 2 years posttransplant compared with baseline values taken prior to transplantation. In conclusion, in this small case series, there was no indication that CTX metabolism was different than that in other populations undergoing transplantation.

Approved and future pharmacotherapy for multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Pharmacotherapy for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) advanced with the demonstration that interferon beta and glatiramer acetate improve the clinical course of this disease. Mitoxantrone is the first drug approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment of secondary progressive MS. Despite this progress, the agents presently available are only partially effective, are difficult to administer, and may have significant side effects. Several orally administered immunomodulatory agents are presently being evaluated for treatment of MS. One class of drugs, HMG CoA inhibitors (statins), is safe and well-tolerated and could become another mainstay of MS therapy.

REVIEW SUMMARY

This article reviews the clinical evidence for approved MS therapies and discusses their mechanisms of action. Furthermore, the clinical and laboratory data suggesting a potential role for statins in MS therapy are discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

Although treatment with interferon beta, glatiramer acetate, and mitoxantrone, the approved therapies, provide important treatment options for patients with relapsing-remitting MS and secondary progressive MS, the potential benefits of other medications, including statins, should be explored in controlled clinical trials.

Treatment of multiple sclerosis with cyclophosphamide: critical review of clinical and immunologic effects

Cyclophosphamide is an alkylating agent used to treat malignancies and immune-mediated inflammatory non-malignant processes such as lupus nephritis and immune-mediated neuropathies. It has been studied as a treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS) for the past 30 years and is used by physicians in selected cases of progressive or worsening MS. Review of published reports suggests that it is efficacious in cases of worsening MS that have an inflammatory component as evidenced by relapses and/or gadolinium (Gd)-enhancing lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or in patients in earlier stages of disease where inflammation predominates over degenerative processes in the central nervous system (CNS). There is no evidence of efficacy in primary progressive MS or later stages of secondary progressive MS. Although a general immunosuppressant that affects both T- and B-cell function, cyclophosphamide has selective immune effects in MS by suppressing IL-12 and Th1-type responses and enhancing Th2/Th3 responses (IL-4, IL-10, TGF-beta; eosinophils in peripheral blood). Side effects include nausea, alopecia, infertility, bladder toxicity and risk of malignancy. The most commonly used regimens involve every 4- to 8-week outpatient i.v. pulse therapy given with or without corticosteroids and are usually well-tolerated by patients. Cyclophosphamide is currently used in patients whose disease is not controlled by beta-interferon or glatiramer acetate and those with rapidly worsening MS.

Cyclophosphamide for multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis is a presumed cell-mediated autoimmune disease of the central nervous system. Cyclophosphamide (CFX) is a cytotoxic and immunosuppressive agent, used in systemic autoimmune diseases. Controversial results have been reported on its efficacy in MS. We conducted a systematic review of all relevant trials, evaluating the CFX efficacy in patients with progressive MS.

OBJECTIVES

The main objectives were to determine whether CFX slows the disease progression.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic databases (including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register) were systematically searched. References list of retrieved studies and conference abstracts on the main meetings on Multiple Sclerosis were handsearched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the clinical effect of CFX treatment in patients affected by clinically definite progressive MS. CFX had to be administered alone or in combination with ACTH or steroids. The comparison group had to be placebo or no treatment or the same co intervention (ACTH or steroids) The main outcome criteria were : progression of disability (defined as an increase of 0.5 point in Kurtzke Extended Disability Status Scale (EDSS) for patients with baseline EDSS > or = 6 and 1 for EDSS < or = 5.5), differences of disability between treatment-control groups and the number of patients with side effects.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The identified references were reviewed by two reviewers who independently decided the eligibility of the study, extracted and summarized data and assessed the trial's quality. The statistical analysis was performed using the Cochrane RevMan software and analyzed using Cochrane MetaView.

MAIN RESULTS

Of the 326 identified references, 80 were selected for full review, only four RCTs were selected for the final analysis. Intensive immunosuppression with CFX (alone or associated with ACTH or prednisone) in patients with progressive MS compared to placebo or no-treatment (152 participants) did not prevent the long -term (12-18-24 months) risk to evolution to a next step of EDSS. However, the mean change in disability (final disability subtracted from the baseline) significantly favoured the treated group at 12 (effect size - 0.21; C. I. - 0.24, - 0.17) and 18 months (- 0.19; C. I. - 0.24, - 0.14). We were not able to verify the efficacy of other schedules. Five patients died; sepsis and amenorrhea frequently occurred in treated patients (descriptive analysis).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Only limited objectives were reached. This review shows a role of CFX in the treatment of progressive MS, but less toxic schedules must be considered, before its use in the clinical practice.