1
|
Borrelli S, Martire MS, Stölting A, Vanden Bulcke C, Pedrini E, Guisset F, Bugli C, Yildiz H, Pothen L, Elands S, Martinelli V, Smith B, Jacobson S, Du Pasquier RA, Van Pesch V, Filippi M, Reich DS, Absinta M, Maggi P. Central Vein Sign, Cortical Lesions, and Paramagnetic Rim Lesions for the Diagnostic and Prognostic Workup of Multiple Sclerosis. NEUROLOGY(R) NEUROIMMUNOLOGY & NEUROINFLAMMATION 2024; 11:e200253. [PMID: 38788180 PMCID: PMC11129678 DOI: 10.1212/nxi.0000000000200253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) can be challenging in clinical practice because MS presentation can be atypical and mimicked by other diseases. We evaluated the diagnostic performance, alone or in combination, of the central vein sign (CVS), paramagnetic rim lesion (PRL), and cortical lesion (CL), as well as their association with clinical outcomes. METHODS In this multicenter observational study, we first conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the CVS (proportion of CVS-positive lesions or simplified determination of CVS in 3/6 lesions-Select3*/Select6*), PRL, and CL in MS and non-MS cases on 3T-MRI brain images, including 3D T2-FLAIR, T2*-echo-planar imaging magnitude and phase, double inversion recovery, and magnetization prepared rapid gradient echo image sequences. Then, we longitudinally analyzed the progression independent of relapse and MRI activity (PIRA) in MS cases over the 2 years after study entry. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to test diagnostic performance and regression models to predict diagnosis and clinical outcomes. RESULTS The presence of ≥41% CVS-positive lesions/≥1 CL/≥1 PRL (optimal cutoffs) had 96%/90%/93% specificity, 97%/84%/60% sensitivity, and 0.99/0.90/0.77 area under the curve (AUC), respectively, to distinguish MS (n = 185) from non-MS (n = 100) cases. The Select3*/Select6* algorithms showed 93%/95% specificity, 97%/89% sensitivity, and 0.95/0.92 AUC. The combination of CVS, CL, and PRL improved the diagnostic performance, especially when Select3*/Select6* were used (93%/94% specificity, 98%/96% sensitivity, 0.99/0.98 AUC; p = 0.002/p < 0.001). In MS cases (n = 185), both CL and PRL were associated with higher MS disability and severity. Longitudinal analysis (n = 61) showed that MS cases with >4 PRL at baseline were more likely to experience PIRA at 2-year follow-up (odds ratio 17.0, 95% confidence interval: 2.1-138.5; p = 0.008), whereas no association was observed between other baseline MRI measures and PIRA, including the number of CL. DISCUSSION The combination of CVS, CL, and PRL can improve MS differential diagnosis. CL and PRL also correlated with clinical measures of poor prognosis, with PRL being a predictor of disability accrual independent of clinical/MRI activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serena Borrelli
- From the Neuroinflammation Imaging Lab (NIL) (S.B., A.S., C.V.B., F.G., P.M.), Institute of NeuroScience, Université catholique de Louvain; Department of Neurology (S.B., S.E.), Hôpital Erasme, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles; Department of Neurology (S.B.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Brugmann, Université Libre de Brussels, Belgium; Neurology Unit (M.S.M., V.M., M.F.), IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy; ICTEAM Institute (C.V.B.), Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (E.P., M.F., M.A.); Translational Neuropathology Unit (E.P., M.A.), Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Plateforme technologique de Support en Méthodologie et Calcul Statistique (C.B.); Department of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases (H.Y., L.P.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Section of Infections of the Nervous System (B.S.); Viral Immunology Section (S.J.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD; Neurology Service (R.A.D.P., P.M.), Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, University of Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (V.V.P., P.M.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.F.), Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Translational Neuroradiology Section (D.S.R.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National In-stitutes of Health (NIH); and Department of Neurology (M.A.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Maria Sofia Martire
- From the Neuroinflammation Imaging Lab (NIL) (S.B., A.S., C.V.B., F.G., P.M.), Institute of NeuroScience, Université catholique de Louvain; Department of Neurology (S.B., S.E.), Hôpital Erasme, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles; Department of Neurology (S.B.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Brugmann, Université Libre de Brussels, Belgium; Neurology Unit (M.S.M., V.M., M.F.), IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy; ICTEAM Institute (C.V.B.), Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (E.P., M.F., M.A.); Translational Neuropathology Unit (E.P., M.A.), Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Plateforme technologique de Support en Méthodologie et Calcul Statistique (C.B.); Department of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases (H.Y., L.P.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Section of Infections of the Nervous System (B.S.); Viral Immunology Section (S.J.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD; Neurology Service (R.A.D.P., P.M.), Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, University of Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (V.V.P., P.M.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.F.), Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Translational Neuroradiology Section (D.S.R.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National In-stitutes of Health (NIH); and Department of Neurology (M.A.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Anna Stölting
- From the Neuroinflammation Imaging Lab (NIL) (S.B., A.S., C.V.B., F.G., P.M.), Institute of NeuroScience, Université catholique de Louvain; Department of Neurology (S.B., S.E.), Hôpital Erasme, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles; Department of Neurology (S.B.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Brugmann, Université Libre de Brussels, Belgium; Neurology Unit (M.S.M., V.M., M.F.), IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy; ICTEAM Institute (C.V.B.), Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (E.P., M.F., M.A.); Translational Neuropathology Unit (E.P., M.A.), Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Plateforme technologique de Support en Méthodologie et Calcul Statistique (C.B.); Department of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases (H.Y., L.P.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Section of Infections of the Nervous System (B.S.); Viral Immunology Section (S.J.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD; Neurology Service (R.A.D.P., P.M.), Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, University of Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (V.V.P., P.M.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.F.), Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Translational Neuroradiology Section (D.S.R.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National In-stitutes of Health (NIH); and Department of Neurology (M.A.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Colin Vanden Bulcke
- From the Neuroinflammation Imaging Lab (NIL) (S.B., A.S., C.V.B., F.G., P.M.), Institute of NeuroScience, Université catholique de Louvain; Department of Neurology (S.B., S.E.), Hôpital Erasme, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles; Department of Neurology (S.B.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Brugmann, Université Libre de Brussels, Belgium; Neurology Unit (M.S.M., V.M., M.F.), IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy; ICTEAM Institute (C.V.B.), Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (E.P., M.F., M.A.); Translational Neuropathology Unit (E.P., M.A.), Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Plateforme technologique de Support en Méthodologie et Calcul Statistique (C.B.); Department of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases (H.Y., L.P.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Section of Infections of the Nervous System (B.S.); Viral Immunology Section (S.J.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD; Neurology Service (R.A.D.P., P.M.), Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, University of Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (V.V.P., P.M.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.F.), Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Translational Neuroradiology Section (D.S.R.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National In-stitutes of Health (NIH); and Department of Neurology (M.A.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Edoardo Pedrini
- From the Neuroinflammation Imaging Lab (NIL) (S.B., A.S., C.V.B., F.G., P.M.), Institute of NeuroScience, Université catholique de Louvain; Department of Neurology (S.B., S.E.), Hôpital Erasme, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles; Department of Neurology (S.B.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Brugmann, Université Libre de Brussels, Belgium; Neurology Unit (M.S.M., V.M., M.F.), IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy; ICTEAM Institute (C.V.B.), Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (E.P., M.F., M.A.); Translational Neuropathology Unit (E.P., M.A.), Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Plateforme technologique de Support en Méthodologie et Calcul Statistique (C.B.); Department of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases (H.Y., L.P.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Section of Infections of the Nervous System (B.S.); Viral Immunology Section (S.J.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD; Neurology Service (R.A.D.P., P.M.), Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, University of Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (V.V.P., P.M.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.F.), Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Translational Neuroradiology Section (D.S.R.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National In-stitutes of Health (NIH); and Department of Neurology (M.A.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - François Guisset
- From the Neuroinflammation Imaging Lab (NIL) (S.B., A.S., C.V.B., F.G., P.M.), Institute of NeuroScience, Université catholique de Louvain; Department of Neurology (S.B., S.E.), Hôpital Erasme, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles; Department of Neurology (S.B.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Brugmann, Université Libre de Brussels, Belgium; Neurology Unit (M.S.M., V.M., M.F.), IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy; ICTEAM Institute (C.V.B.), Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (E.P., M.F., M.A.); Translational Neuropathology Unit (E.P., M.A.), Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Plateforme technologique de Support en Méthodologie et Calcul Statistique (C.B.); Department of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases (H.Y., L.P.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Section of Infections of the Nervous System (B.S.); Viral Immunology Section (S.J.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD; Neurology Service (R.A.D.P., P.M.), Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, University of Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (V.V.P., P.M.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.F.), Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Translational Neuroradiology Section (D.S.R.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National In-stitutes of Health (NIH); and Department of Neurology (M.A.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Céline Bugli
- From the Neuroinflammation Imaging Lab (NIL) (S.B., A.S., C.V.B., F.G., P.M.), Institute of NeuroScience, Université catholique de Louvain; Department of Neurology (S.B., S.E.), Hôpital Erasme, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles; Department of Neurology (S.B.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Brugmann, Université Libre de Brussels, Belgium; Neurology Unit (M.S.M., V.M., M.F.), IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy; ICTEAM Institute (C.V.B.), Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (E.P., M.F., M.A.); Translational Neuropathology Unit (E.P., M.A.), Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Plateforme technologique de Support en Méthodologie et Calcul Statistique (C.B.); Department of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases (H.Y., L.P.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Section of Infections of the Nervous System (B.S.); Viral Immunology Section (S.J.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD; Neurology Service (R.A.D.P., P.M.), Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, University of Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (V.V.P., P.M.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.F.), Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Translational Neuroradiology Section (D.S.R.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National In-stitutes of Health (NIH); and Department of Neurology (M.A.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Halil Yildiz
- From the Neuroinflammation Imaging Lab (NIL) (S.B., A.S., C.V.B., F.G., P.M.), Institute of NeuroScience, Université catholique de Louvain; Department of Neurology (S.B., S.E.), Hôpital Erasme, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles; Department of Neurology (S.B.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Brugmann, Université Libre de Brussels, Belgium; Neurology Unit (M.S.M., V.M., M.F.), IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy; ICTEAM Institute (C.V.B.), Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (E.P., M.F., M.A.); Translational Neuropathology Unit (E.P., M.A.), Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Plateforme technologique de Support en Méthodologie et Calcul Statistique (C.B.); Department of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases (H.Y., L.P.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Section of Infections of the Nervous System (B.S.); Viral Immunology Section (S.J.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD; Neurology Service (R.A.D.P., P.M.), Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, University of Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (V.V.P., P.M.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.F.), Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Translational Neuroradiology Section (D.S.R.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National In-stitutes of Health (NIH); and Department of Neurology (M.A.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Lucie Pothen
- From the Neuroinflammation Imaging Lab (NIL) (S.B., A.S., C.V.B., F.G., P.M.), Institute of NeuroScience, Université catholique de Louvain; Department of Neurology (S.B., S.E.), Hôpital Erasme, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles; Department of Neurology (S.B.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Brugmann, Université Libre de Brussels, Belgium; Neurology Unit (M.S.M., V.M., M.F.), IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy; ICTEAM Institute (C.V.B.), Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (E.P., M.F., M.A.); Translational Neuropathology Unit (E.P., M.A.), Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Plateforme technologique de Support en Méthodologie et Calcul Statistique (C.B.); Department of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases (H.Y., L.P.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Section of Infections of the Nervous System (B.S.); Viral Immunology Section (S.J.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD; Neurology Service (R.A.D.P., P.M.), Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, University of Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (V.V.P., P.M.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.F.), Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Translational Neuroradiology Section (D.S.R.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National In-stitutes of Health (NIH); and Department of Neurology (M.A.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Sophie Elands
- From the Neuroinflammation Imaging Lab (NIL) (S.B., A.S., C.V.B., F.G., P.M.), Institute of NeuroScience, Université catholique de Louvain; Department of Neurology (S.B., S.E.), Hôpital Erasme, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles; Department of Neurology (S.B.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Brugmann, Université Libre de Brussels, Belgium; Neurology Unit (M.S.M., V.M., M.F.), IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy; ICTEAM Institute (C.V.B.), Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (E.P., M.F., M.A.); Translational Neuropathology Unit (E.P., M.A.), Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Plateforme technologique de Support en Méthodologie et Calcul Statistique (C.B.); Department of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases (H.Y., L.P.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Section of Infections of the Nervous System (B.S.); Viral Immunology Section (S.J.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD; Neurology Service (R.A.D.P., P.M.), Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, University of Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (V.V.P., P.M.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.F.), Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Translational Neuroradiology Section (D.S.R.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National In-stitutes of Health (NIH); and Department of Neurology (M.A.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Vittorio Martinelli
- From the Neuroinflammation Imaging Lab (NIL) (S.B., A.S., C.V.B., F.G., P.M.), Institute of NeuroScience, Université catholique de Louvain; Department of Neurology (S.B., S.E.), Hôpital Erasme, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles; Department of Neurology (S.B.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Brugmann, Université Libre de Brussels, Belgium; Neurology Unit (M.S.M., V.M., M.F.), IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy; ICTEAM Institute (C.V.B.), Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (E.P., M.F., M.A.); Translational Neuropathology Unit (E.P., M.A.), Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Plateforme technologique de Support en Méthodologie et Calcul Statistique (C.B.); Department of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases (H.Y., L.P.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Section of Infections of the Nervous System (B.S.); Viral Immunology Section (S.J.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD; Neurology Service (R.A.D.P., P.M.), Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, University of Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (V.V.P., P.M.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.F.), Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Translational Neuroradiology Section (D.S.R.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National In-stitutes of Health (NIH); and Department of Neurology (M.A.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Bryan Smith
- From the Neuroinflammation Imaging Lab (NIL) (S.B., A.S., C.V.B., F.G., P.M.), Institute of NeuroScience, Université catholique de Louvain; Department of Neurology (S.B., S.E.), Hôpital Erasme, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles; Department of Neurology (S.B.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Brugmann, Université Libre de Brussels, Belgium; Neurology Unit (M.S.M., V.M., M.F.), IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy; ICTEAM Institute (C.V.B.), Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (E.P., M.F., M.A.); Translational Neuropathology Unit (E.P., M.A.), Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Plateforme technologique de Support en Méthodologie et Calcul Statistique (C.B.); Department of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases (H.Y., L.P.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Section of Infections of the Nervous System (B.S.); Viral Immunology Section (S.J.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD; Neurology Service (R.A.D.P., P.M.), Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, University of Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (V.V.P., P.M.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.F.), Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Translational Neuroradiology Section (D.S.R.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National In-stitutes of Health (NIH); and Department of Neurology (M.A.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Steven Jacobson
- From the Neuroinflammation Imaging Lab (NIL) (S.B., A.S., C.V.B., F.G., P.M.), Institute of NeuroScience, Université catholique de Louvain; Department of Neurology (S.B., S.E.), Hôpital Erasme, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles; Department of Neurology (S.B.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Brugmann, Université Libre de Brussels, Belgium; Neurology Unit (M.S.M., V.M., M.F.), IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy; ICTEAM Institute (C.V.B.), Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (E.P., M.F., M.A.); Translational Neuropathology Unit (E.P., M.A.), Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Plateforme technologique de Support en Méthodologie et Calcul Statistique (C.B.); Department of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases (H.Y., L.P.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Section of Infections of the Nervous System (B.S.); Viral Immunology Section (S.J.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD; Neurology Service (R.A.D.P., P.M.), Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, University of Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (V.V.P., P.M.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.F.), Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Translational Neuroradiology Section (D.S.R.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National In-stitutes of Health (NIH); and Department of Neurology (M.A.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Renaud A Du Pasquier
- From the Neuroinflammation Imaging Lab (NIL) (S.B., A.S., C.V.B., F.G., P.M.), Institute of NeuroScience, Université catholique de Louvain; Department of Neurology (S.B., S.E.), Hôpital Erasme, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles; Department of Neurology (S.B.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Brugmann, Université Libre de Brussels, Belgium; Neurology Unit (M.S.M., V.M., M.F.), IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy; ICTEAM Institute (C.V.B.), Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (E.P., M.F., M.A.); Translational Neuropathology Unit (E.P., M.A.), Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Plateforme technologique de Support en Méthodologie et Calcul Statistique (C.B.); Department of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases (H.Y., L.P.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Section of Infections of the Nervous System (B.S.); Viral Immunology Section (S.J.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD; Neurology Service (R.A.D.P., P.M.), Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, University of Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (V.V.P., P.M.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.F.), Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Translational Neuroradiology Section (D.S.R.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National In-stitutes of Health (NIH); and Department of Neurology (M.A.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Vincent Van Pesch
- From the Neuroinflammation Imaging Lab (NIL) (S.B., A.S., C.V.B., F.G., P.M.), Institute of NeuroScience, Université catholique de Louvain; Department of Neurology (S.B., S.E.), Hôpital Erasme, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles; Department of Neurology (S.B.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Brugmann, Université Libre de Brussels, Belgium; Neurology Unit (M.S.M., V.M., M.F.), IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy; ICTEAM Institute (C.V.B.), Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (E.P., M.F., M.A.); Translational Neuropathology Unit (E.P., M.A.), Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Plateforme technologique de Support en Méthodologie et Calcul Statistique (C.B.); Department of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases (H.Y., L.P.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Section of Infections of the Nervous System (B.S.); Viral Immunology Section (S.J.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD; Neurology Service (R.A.D.P., P.M.), Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, University of Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (V.V.P., P.M.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.F.), Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Translational Neuroradiology Section (D.S.R.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National In-stitutes of Health (NIH); and Department of Neurology (M.A.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Massimo Filippi
- From the Neuroinflammation Imaging Lab (NIL) (S.B., A.S., C.V.B., F.G., P.M.), Institute of NeuroScience, Université catholique de Louvain; Department of Neurology (S.B., S.E.), Hôpital Erasme, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles; Department of Neurology (S.B.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Brugmann, Université Libre de Brussels, Belgium; Neurology Unit (M.S.M., V.M., M.F.), IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy; ICTEAM Institute (C.V.B.), Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (E.P., M.F., M.A.); Translational Neuropathology Unit (E.P., M.A.), Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Plateforme technologique de Support en Méthodologie et Calcul Statistique (C.B.); Department of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases (H.Y., L.P.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Section of Infections of the Nervous System (B.S.); Viral Immunology Section (S.J.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD; Neurology Service (R.A.D.P., P.M.), Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, University of Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (V.V.P., P.M.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.F.), Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Translational Neuroradiology Section (D.S.R.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National In-stitutes of Health (NIH); and Department of Neurology (M.A.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Daniel S Reich
- From the Neuroinflammation Imaging Lab (NIL) (S.B., A.S., C.V.B., F.G., P.M.), Institute of NeuroScience, Université catholique de Louvain; Department of Neurology (S.B., S.E.), Hôpital Erasme, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles; Department of Neurology (S.B.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Brugmann, Université Libre de Brussels, Belgium; Neurology Unit (M.S.M., V.M., M.F.), IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy; ICTEAM Institute (C.V.B.), Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (E.P., M.F., M.A.); Translational Neuropathology Unit (E.P., M.A.), Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Plateforme technologique de Support en Méthodologie et Calcul Statistique (C.B.); Department of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases (H.Y., L.P.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Section of Infections of the Nervous System (B.S.); Viral Immunology Section (S.J.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD; Neurology Service (R.A.D.P., P.M.), Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, University of Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (V.V.P., P.M.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.F.), Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Translational Neuroradiology Section (D.S.R.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National In-stitutes of Health (NIH); and Department of Neurology (M.A.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Martina Absinta
- From the Neuroinflammation Imaging Lab (NIL) (S.B., A.S., C.V.B., F.G., P.M.), Institute of NeuroScience, Université catholique de Louvain; Department of Neurology (S.B., S.E.), Hôpital Erasme, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles; Department of Neurology (S.B.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Brugmann, Université Libre de Brussels, Belgium; Neurology Unit (M.S.M., V.M., M.F.), IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy; ICTEAM Institute (C.V.B.), Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (E.P., M.F., M.A.); Translational Neuropathology Unit (E.P., M.A.), Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Plateforme technologique de Support en Méthodologie et Calcul Statistique (C.B.); Department of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases (H.Y., L.P.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Section of Infections of the Nervous System (B.S.); Viral Immunology Section (S.J.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD; Neurology Service (R.A.D.P., P.M.), Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, University of Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (V.V.P., P.M.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.F.), Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Translational Neuroradiology Section (D.S.R.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National In-stitutes of Health (NIH); and Department of Neurology (M.A.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Pietro Maggi
- From the Neuroinflammation Imaging Lab (NIL) (S.B., A.S., C.V.B., F.G., P.M.), Institute of NeuroScience, Université catholique de Louvain; Department of Neurology (S.B., S.E.), Hôpital Erasme, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles; Department of Neurology (S.B.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Brugmann, Université Libre de Brussels, Belgium; Neurology Unit (M.S.M., V.M., M.F.), IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy; ICTEAM Institute (C.V.B.), Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (E.P., M.F., M.A.); Translational Neuropathology Unit (E.P., M.A.), Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Plateforme technologique de Support en Méthodologie et Calcul Statistique (C.B.); Department of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases (H.Y., L.P.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Section of Infections of the Nervous System (B.S.); Viral Immunology Section (S.J.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD; Neurology Service (R.A.D.P., P.M.), Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, University of Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (V.V.P., P.M.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.F.), Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Translational Neuroradiology Section (D.S.R.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National In-stitutes of Health (NIH); and Department of Neurology (M.A.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kukanja P, Langseth CM, Rubio Rodríguez-Kirby LA, Agirre E, Zheng C, Raman A, Yokota C, Avenel C, Tiklová K, Guerreiro-Cacais AO, Olsson T, Hilscher MM, Nilsson M, Castelo-Branco G. Cellular architecture of evolving neuroinflammatory lesions and multiple sclerosis pathology. Cell 2024; 187:1990-2009.e19. [PMID: 38513664 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.02.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2023] [Revised: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a neurological disease characterized by multifocal lesions and smoldering pathology. Although single-cell analyses provided insights into cytopathology, evolving cellular processes underlying MS remain poorly understood. We investigated the cellular dynamics of MS by modeling temporal and regional rates of disease progression in mouse experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). By performing single-cell spatial expression profiling using in situ sequencing (ISS), we annotated disease neighborhoods and found centrifugal evolution of active lesions. We demonstrated that disease-associated (DA)-glia arise independently of lesions and are dynamically induced and resolved over the disease course. Single-cell spatial mapping of human archival MS spinal cords confirmed the differential distribution of homeostatic and DA-glia, enabled deconvolution of active and inactive lesions into sub-compartments, and identified new lesion areas. By establishing a spatial resource of mouse and human MS neuropathology at a single-cell resolution, our study unveils the intricate cellular dynamics underlying MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra Kukanja
- Laboratory of Molecular Neurobiology, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Biomedicum, Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Christoffer M Langseth
- Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, Solna, 17154 Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Leslie A Rubio Rodríguez-Kirby
- Laboratory of Molecular Neurobiology, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Biomedicum, Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Eneritz Agirre
- Laboratory of Molecular Neurobiology, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Biomedicum, Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Chao Zheng
- Laboratory of Molecular Neurobiology, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Biomedicum, Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Amitha Raman
- Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, Solna, 17154 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Chika Yokota
- Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, Solna, 17154 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Christophe Avenel
- Department of Information Technology, Uppsala University, 752 37 Uppsala, Sweden; BioImage Informatics Facility, Science for Life Laboratory, SciLifeLab, 751 05 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Katarina Tiklová
- Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, Solna, 17154 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - André O Guerreiro-Cacais
- Center for Molecular Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, 171 76 Solna, Sweden
| | - Tomas Olsson
- Center for Molecular Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, 171 76 Solna, Sweden
| | - Markus M Hilscher
- Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, Solna, 17154 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mats Nilsson
- Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, Solna, 17154 Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Gonçalo Castelo-Branco
- Laboratory of Molecular Neurobiology, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Biomedicum, Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Landes-Chateau C, Levraut M, Okuda DT, Themelin A, Cohen M, Kantarci OH, Siva A, Pelletier D, Mondot L, Lebrun-Frenay C. The diagnostic value of the central vein sign in radiologically isolated syndrome. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2024; 11:662-672. [PMID: 38186317 DOI: 10.1002/acn3.51986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2023] [Revised: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS) represents the earliest detectable preclinical phase of multiple sclerosis (MS). Increasing evidence suggests that the central vein sign (CVS) enhances lesion specificity, allowing for greater MS diagnostic accuracy. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of the CVS in RIS. METHODS Patients were prospectively recruited in a single tertiary center for MS care. Participants with RIS were included and compared to a control group of sex and age-matched subjects. All participants underwent 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging, including postcontrast susceptibility-based sequences, and the presence of CVS was analyzed. Sensitivity and specificity were assessed for different CVS lesion criteria, defined by proportions of lesions positive for CVS (CVS+) or by the absolute number of CVS+ lesions. RESULTS 180 participants (45 RIS, 45 MS, 90 non-MS) were included, representing 5285 white matter lesions. Among them, 4608 were eligible for the CVS assessment (970 in RIS, 1378 in MS, and 2260 in non-MS). According to independent ROC comparisons, the proportion of CVS+ lesions performed similarly in diagnosing RIS from non-MS than MS from non-MS (p = 0.837). When a 6-lesion CVS+ threshold was applied, RIS lesions could be diagnosed with an accuracy of 87%. MS could be diagnosed with a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 83%. Adding OCBs or Kappa index to CVS biomarker increased the specificity to 100% for RIS diagnosis. INTERPRETATION This study shows evidence that CVS is an effective imaging biomarker in differentiating RIS from non-MS, with similar performances to those in MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michael Levraut
- Université Cote d'Azur, UMR2CA (URRIS), Nice, France
- Service de Médecine Interne, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Hôpital l'Archet 1, Nice, France
| | - Darin T Okuda
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Albert Themelin
- Service de Radiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Hôpital Pasteur 2, Nice, France
| | - Mikael Cohen
- Université Cote d'Azur, UMR2CA (URRIS), Nice, France
- Service de Neurologie, Centre de Ressource et de Compétence Sclérose en Plaques (CRC-SEP), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Hôpital Pasteur 2, Nice, France
| | | | - Aksel Siva
- Istanbul University, Cerrahpasa School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Lydiane Mondot
- Université Cote d'Azur, UMR2CA (URRIS), Nice, France
- Service de Radiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Hôpital Pasteur 2, Nice, France
| | - Christine Lebrun-Frenay
- Université Cote d'Azur, UMR2CA (URRIS), Nice, France
- Service de Neurologie, Centre de Ressource et de Compétence Sclérose en Plaques (CRC-SEP), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Hôpital Pasteur 2, Nice, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chertcoff A, Schneider R, Azevedo CJ, Sicotte N, Oh J. Recent Advances in Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Disease-Monitoring Biomarkers in Multiple Sclerosis. Neurol Clin 2024; 42:15-38. [PMID: 37980112 DOI: 10.1016/j.ncl.2023.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2023]
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a highly heterogeneous disease. Currently, a combination of clinical features, MRI, and cerebrospinal fluid markers are used in clinical practice for diagnosis and treatment decisions. In recent years, there has been considerable effort to develop novel biomarkers that better reflect the pathologic substrates of the disease to aid in diagnosis and early prognosis, evaluation of ongoing inflammatory activity, detection and monitoring of disease progression, prediction of treatment response, and monitoring of disease-modifying treatment safety. In this review, the authors provide an overview of promising recent developments in diagnostic, prognostic, and disease-monitoring/treatment-response biomarkers in MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anibal Chertcoff
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, 30 Bond Street, PGT 17-742, Toronto, Ontario M5B 1W8, Canada
| | - Raphael Schneider
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, 30 Bond Street, PGT 17-742, Toronto, Ontario M5B 1W8, Canada
| | - Christina J Azevedo
- Department of Neurology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, HCT 1520 San Pablo Street, Health Sciences Campus, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Nancy Sicotte
- Department of Neurology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 127 S San Vicente Boulevard, 6th floor, Suite A6600, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Jiwon Oh
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, 30 Bond Street, PGT 17-742, Toronto, Ontario M5B 1W8, Canada; Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cagol A, Cortese R, Barakovic M, Schaedelin S, Ruberte E, Absinta M, Barkhof F, Calabrese M, Castellaro M, Ciccarelli O, Cocozza S, De Stefano N, Enzinger C, Filippi M, Jurynczyk M, Maggi P, Mahmoudi N, Messina S, Montalban X, Palace J, Pontillo G, Pröbstel AK, Rocca MA, Ropele S, Rovira À, Schoonheim MM, Sowa P, Strijbis E, Wattjes MP, Sormani MP, Kappos L, Granziera C. Diagnostic Performance of Cortical Lesions and the Central Vein Sign in Multiple Sclerosis. JAMA Neurol 2024; 81:143-153. [PMID: 38079177 PMCID: PMC10714285 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.4737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/13/2024]
Abstract
Importance Multiple sclerosis (MS) misdiagnosis remains an important issue in clinical practice. Objective To quantify the performance of cortical lesions (CLs) and central vein sign (CVS) in distinguishing MS from other conditions showing brain lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Design, Setting, and Participants This was a retrospective, cross-sectional multicenter study, with clinical and MRI data acquired between January 2010 and May 2020. Centralized MRI analysis was conducted between July 2020 and December 2022 by 2 raters blinded to participants' diagnosis. Participants were recruited from 14 European centers and from a multicenter pan-European cohort. Eligible participants had a diagnosis of MS, clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), or non-MS conditions; availability of a brain 3-T MRI scan with at least 1 sequence suitable for CL and CVS assessment; presence of T2-hyperintense white matter lesions (WMLs). A total of 1051 individuals were included with either MS/CIS (n = 599; 386 [64.4%] female; mean [SD] age, 41.5 [12.3] years) or non-MS conditions (including other neuroinflammatory disorders, cerebrovascular disease, migraine, and incidental WMLs in healthy control individuals; n = 452; 302 [66.8%] female; mean [SD] age, 49.2 [14.5] years). Five individuals were excluded due to missing clinical or demographic information (n = 3) or unclear diagnosis (n = 2). Exposures MS/CIS vs non-MS conditions. Main Outcomes and Measures Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were used to explore the diagnostic performance of CLs and the CVS in isolation and in combination; sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated for various cutoffs. The diagnostic importance of CLs and CVS compared to conventional MRI features (ie, presence of infratentorial, periventricular, and juxtacortical WMLs) was ranked with a random forest model. Results The presence of CLs and the previously proposed 40% CVS rule had a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for MS of 59.0% (95% CI, 55.1-62.8), 93.6% (95% CI, 91.4-95.6), and 73.9% (95% CI, 71.6-76.3) and 78.7% (95% CI, 75.5-82.0), 86.0% (95% CI, 82.1-89.5), and 81.5% (95% CI, 78.9-83.7), respectively. The diagnostic performance of the CVS (AUC, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.86-0.91]) was superior to that of CLs (AUC, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.75-0.80]; P < .001), and was increased when combining the 2 imaging markers (AUC, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.90-0.94]; P = .04); in the random forest model, both CVS and CLs outperformed the presence of infratentorial, periventricular, and juxtacortical WMLs in supporting MS differential diagnosis. Conclusions and Relevance The findings in this study suggest that CVS and CLs may be valuable tools to increase the accuracy of MS diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Cagol
- Translational Imaging in Neurology Basel, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
- Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Rosa Cortese
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
- Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Muhamed Barakovic
- Translational Imaging in Neurology Basel, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
- Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Sabine Schaedelin
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
- Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Esther Ruberte
- Translational Imaging in Neurology Basel, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
- Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Medical Image Analysis Center, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Martina Absinta
- Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University and Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, United Kingdom
- Multiple Sclerosis Center Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam University Medical College VUMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Massimiliano Calabrese
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Marco Castellaro
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
- Department of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Olga Ciccarelli
- Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sirio Cocozza
- Departments of Advanced Biomedical Sciences and Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Nicola De Stefano
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Christian Enzinger
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- Division of Neuroradiology, Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Massimo Filippi
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Neurology Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Neurorehabilitation Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Neurophysiology Service, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Maciej Jurynczyk
- Department of Clinical Neurology, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Laboratory of Brain Imaging, Neurobiology Center, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Pietro Maggi
- Department of Neurology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
- Neuroinflammation Imaging Lab, Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Nima Mahmoudi
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Silvia Messina
- Department of Clinical Neurology, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Xavier Montalban
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia, Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Division of Neurology, St Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jacqueline Palace
- Department of Clinical Neurology, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Giuseppe Pontillo
- Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Multiple Sclerosis Center Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam University Medical College VUMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Departments of Advanced Biomedical Sciences and Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Anne-Katrin Pröbstel
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
- Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Departments of Biomedicine and Clinical Research, University Hospital of Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Maria A. Rocca
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Neurology Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefan Ropele
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- Division of Neuroradiology, Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Àlex Rovira
- Section of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Menno M. Schoonheim
- Multiple Sclerosis Center Amsterdam, Anatomy and Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam University Medical College VUMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Piotr Sowa
- Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eva Strijbis
- Multiple Sclerosis Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam University Medical College VUMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mike P. Wattjes
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Maria Pia Sormani
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
- Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Ludwig Kappos
- Translational Imaging in Neurology Basel, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
- Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Cristina Granziera
- Translational Imaging in Neurology Basel, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
- Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Daboul L, O’Donnell CM, Amin M, Rodrigues P, Derbyshire J, Azevedo C, Bar-Or A, Caverzasi E, Calabresi PA, Cree BA, Freeman L, Henry RG, Longbrake EE, Oh J, Papinutto N, Pelletier D, Prchkovska V, Raza P, Ramos M, Samudralwar RD, Schindler MK, Sotirchos ES, Sicotte NL, Solomon AJ, Shinohara RT, Reich DS, Sati P, Ontaneda D. A multicenter pilot study evaluating simplified central vein assessment for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2024; 30:25-34. [PMID: 38088067 PMCID: PMC11037932 DOI: 10.1177/13524585231214360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The central vein sign (CVS) is a proposed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biomarker for multiple sclerosis (MS); the optimal method for abbreviated CVS scoring is not yet established. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of a simplified approach to CVS assessment in a multicenter study of patients being evaluated for suspected MS. METHODS Adults referred for possible MS to 10 sites were recruited. A post-Gd 3D T2*-weighted MRI sequence (FLAIR*) was obtained in each subject. Trained raters at each site identified up to six CVS-positive lesions per FLAIR* scan. Diagnostic performance of CVS was evaluated for a diagnosis of MS which had been confirmed using the 2017 McDonald criteria at thresholds including three positive lesions (Select-3*) and six positive lesions (Select-6*). Inter-rater reliability assessments were performed. RESULTS Overall, 78 participants were analyzed; 37 (47%) were diagnosed with MS, and 41 (53%) were not. The mean age of participants was 45 (range: 19-64) years, and most were female (n = 55, 71%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for the simplified counting method was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.73-0.93). Select-3* and Select-6* had sensitivity of 81% and 65% and specificity of 68% and 98%, respectively. Inter-rater agreement was 78% for Select-3* and 83% for Select-6*. CONCLUSION A simplified method for CVS assessment in patients referred for suspected MS demonstrated good diagnostic performance and inter-rater agreement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynn Daboul
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH
| | - Carly M. O’Donnell
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Moein Amin
- Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | | | - John Derbyshire
- Functional MRI Facility, NIMH, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Christina Azevedo
- Department of Neurology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Amit Bar-Or
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Eduardo Caverzasi
- Department of Neurology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Bruce A.C. Cree
- Department of Neurology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Leorah Freeman
- Department of Neurology, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas, Austin, TX
| | - Roland G. Henry
- Department of Neurology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Jiwon Oh
- Division of Neurology, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, CANADA
| | - Nico Papinutto
- Department of Neurology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Daniel Pelletier
- Department of Neurology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Praneeta Raza
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH
| | - Marc Ramos
- QMENTA Cloud Platform, QMENTA Inc., Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Matthew K. Schindler
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Nancy L. Sicotte
- Department of Neurology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Andrew J. Solomon
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Larner College of Medicine, The University of Vermont, Burlington, VT
| | - Russell T. Shinohara
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Daniel S. Reich
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Pascal Sati
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
- Department of Neurology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Daniel Ontaneda
- Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cacciaguerra L, Rocca MA, Filippi M. Understanding the Pathophysiology and Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis and Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders. Korean J Radiol 2023; 24:1260-1283. [PMID: 38016685 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2023.0360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Revised: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 11/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been extensively applied in the study of multiple sclerosis (MS), substantially contributing to diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and disease monitoring. MRI studies have significantly contributed to the understanding of MS through the characterization of typical radiological features and their clinical or prognostic implications using conventional MRI pulse sequences and further with the application of advanced imaging techniques sensitive to microstructural damage. Interpretation of results has often been validated by MRI-pathology studies. However, the application of MRI techniques in the study of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) remains an emerging field, and MRI studies have focused on radiological correlates of NMOSD and its pathophysiology to aid in diagnosis, improve monitoring, and identify relevant prognostic factors. In this review, we discuss the main contributions of MRI to the understanding of MS and NMOSD, focusing on the most novel discoveries to clarify differences in the pathophysiology of focal inflammation initiation and perpetuation, involvement of normal-appearing tissue, potential entry routes of pathogenic elements into the CNS, and existence of primary or secondary mechanisms of neurodegeneration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Cacciaguerra
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
| | - Maria A Rocca
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milano, Italy
| | - Massimo Filippi
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milano, Italy
- Neurorehabilitation Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
- Neurophysiology Service, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abou Mrad T, Naja K, Khoury SJ, Hannoun S. Central vein sign and paramagnetic rim sign: From radiologically isolated syndrome to multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol 2023; 30:2912-2918. [PMID: 37350369 DOI: 10.1111/ene.15922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2023] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023]
Abstract
The widespread use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has led to an increase in incidental findings in the central nervous system. Radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS) is a condition where imaging reveals lesions suggestive of demyelinating disease without any clinical episodes consistent with multiple sclerosis (MS). The prognosis for RIS patients is uncertain, with some remaining asymptomatic while others progress to MS. Several risk factors for disease progression have been identified, including male sex, younger age at diagnosis, and spinal cord lesions. This article reviews two promising biomarkers, the central vein sign (CVS) and the paramagnetic rim sign (PRS), and their potential role in the diagnosis and prognosis of MS and RIS. Both CVS and PRS have been shown to be accurate diagnostic markers in MS, with high sensitivity and specificity, and have been useful in distinguishing MS from other disorders. Further research is needed to validate these findings and determine the clinical utility of these biomarkers in routine practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatiana Abou Mrad
- Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Kim Naja
- Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Samia J Khoury
- Nehme and Therese Tohme Multiple Sclerosis Center, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Salem Hannoun
- Medical Imaging Sciences Program, Division of Health Professions, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gill AJ, Schorr EM, Gadani SP, Calabresi PA. Emerging imaging and liquid biomarkers in multiple sclerosis. Eur J Immunol 2023; 53:e2250228. [PMID: 37194443 PMCID: PMC10524168 DOI: 10.1002/eji.202250228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Revised: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
The advent of highly effective disease modifying therapy has transformed the landscape of multiple sclerosis (MS) care over the last two decades. However, there remains a critical, unmet need for sensitive and specific biomarkers to aid in diagnosis, prognosis, treatment monitoring, and the development of new interventions, particularly for people with progressive disease. This review evaluates the current data for several emerging imaging and liquid biomarkers in people with MS. MRI findings such as the central vein sign and paramagnetic rim lesions may improve MS diagnostic accuracy and evaluation of therapy efficacy in progressive disease. Serum and cerebrospinal fluid levels of several neuroglial proteins, such as neurofilament light chain and glial fibrillary acidic protein, show potential to be sensitive biomarkers of pathologic processes such as neuro-axonal injury or glial-inflammation. Additional promising biomarkers, including optical coherence tomography, cytokines and chemokines, microRNAs, and extracellular vesicles/exosomes, are also reviewed, among others. Beyond their potential integration into MS clinical care and interventional trials, several of these biomarkers may be informative of MS pathogenesis and help elucidate novel targets for treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander J. Gill
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Neurology, Baltimore, MD, US
| | - Emily M. Schorr
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Neurology, Baltimore, MD, US
| | - Sachin P. Gadani
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Neurology, Baltimore, MD, US
| | - Peter A. Calabresi
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Neurology, Baltimore, MD, US
- Department of Neuroscience, Baltimore, MD, US
- Department of Ophthalmology, Baltimore, MD, US
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Harrison KL, Gaudioso C, Levasseur VA, Dunham SR, Schanzer N, Keuchel C, Salter A, Goyal MS, Mar S. Central Vein Sign in Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis and Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody-Associated Disease. Pediatr Neurol 2023; 146:21-25. [PMID: 37406422 DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2023.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Revised: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The central vein sign (CVS) on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a promising diagnostic marker for distinguishing adult multiple sclerosis (MS) from other demyelinating conditions, but its prevalence is not well-established in pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) versus myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD). MOGAD can mimic MS radiologically. This study seeks to determine the utility of CVS, together with other radiological findings, in distinguishing POMS from MOGAD in children. METHODS Children with POMS or MOGAD were identified in a pediatric demyelinating database. Two reviewers, blinded to diagnosis, fused fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequences and susceptibility-weighted imaging from clinical imaging to identify CVS. Agreement in CVS number was reported using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). We performed topographic analyses as well as characterization of the clinical information and lesions on brain, spinal cord, and orbital MRI when available. RESULTS Twenty children, 10 with POMS and 10 with MOGAD, were assessed. The median lesion percentage of CVS was higher in POMS versus MOGAD for both raters (rater 1: 80% vs 9.8%; rater 2: 22.7% vs 7.5%). Inter-rater reliability for identifying total white matter lesions was strong (ICC 0.94 [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84, 0.97]); however, it was poor for detecting CVS lesions (ICC -0.17 [95% CI: -0.37, 0.58]). CONCLUSION The CVS can be a useful diagnostic tool for differentiating POMS from MOGAD. However, advanced clinical imaging tools that can better detect CVS are needed to increase inter-rater reliability before clinical application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimystian L Harrison
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
| | - Cristina Gaudioso
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Victoria A Levasseur
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - S Richard Dunham
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Natalie Schanzer
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Connor Keuchel
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Amber Salter
- Department of Biostatistics, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Manu S Goyal
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; Department of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Soe Mar
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Collorone S, Foster MA, Toosy AT. Advanced central nervous system imaging biomarkers in radiologically isolated syndrome: a mini review. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1172807. [PMID: 37273705 PMCID: PMC10235479 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1172807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiologically isolated syndrome is characterised by central nervous system white-matter hyperintensities highly suggestive of multiple sclerosis in individuals without a neurological history of clinical demyelinating episodes. It probably represents the pre-symptomatic phase of clinical multiple sclerosis but is poorly understood. This mini review summarises our current knowledge regarding advanced imaging techniques in radiologically isolated syndrome that provide insights into its pathobiology and prognosis. The imaging covered will include magnetic resonance imaging-derived markers of central nervous system volumetrics, connectivity, and the central vein sign, alongside optical coherence tomography-related metrics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ahmed T. Toosy
- Queen Square MS Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lapucci C, Tazza F, Rebella S, Boffa G, Sbragia E, Bruschi N, Mancuso E, Mavilio N, Signori A, Roccatagliata L, Cellerino M, Schiavi S, Inglese M. Central vein sign and diffusion MRI differentiate microstructural features within white matter lesions of multiple sclerosis patients with comorbidities. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1084661. [PMID: 36970546 PMCID: PMC10030505 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1084661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2022] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The Central Vein Sign (CVS) has been suggested as a potential biomarker to improve diagnostic specificity in multiple sclerosis (MS). Nevertheless, the impact of comorbidities on CVS performance has been poorly investigated so far. Despite the similar features shared by MS, migraine and Small Vessel Disease (SVD) at T2-weighted conventional MRI sequences, ex-vivo studies demonstrated their heterogeneous histopathological substrates. If in MS, inflammation, primitive demyelination and axonal loss coexist, in SVD demyelination is secondary to ischemic microangiopathy, while the contemporary presence of inflammatory and ischemic processes has been suggested in migraine. The aims of this study were to investigate the impact of comorbidities (risk factors for SVD and migraine) on the global and subregional assessment of the CVS in a large cohort of MS patients and to apply the Spherical Mean Technique (SMT) diffusion model to evaluate whether perivenular and non-perivenular lesions show distinctive microstructural features. Methods 120 MS patients stratified into 4 Age Groups performed 3T brain MRI. WM lesions were classified in "perivenular" and "non-perivenular" by visual inspection of FLAIR* images; mean values of SMT metrics, indirect estimators of inflammation, demyelination and fiber disruption (EXTRAMD: extraneurite mean diffusivity, EXTRATRANS: extraneurite transverse diffusivity and INTRA: intraneurite signal fraction, respectively) were extracted. Results Of the 5303 lesions selected for the CVS assessment, 68.7% were perivenular. Significant differences were found between perivenular and non-perivenular lesion volume in the whole brain (p < 0.001) and between perivenular and non-perivenular lesion volume and number in all the four subregions (p < 0.001 for all). The percentage of perivenular lesions decreased from youngest to oldest patients (79.7%-57.7%), with the deep/subcortical WM of oldest patients as the only subregion where the number of non-perivenular was higher than the number of perivenular lesions. Older age and migraine were independent predictors of a higher percentage of non-perivenular lesions (p < 0.001 and p = 0.013 respectively). Whole brain perivenular lesions showed higher inflammation, demyelination and fiber disruption than non perivenular lesions (p = 0.001, p = 0.001 and p = 0.02 for EXTRAMD, EXTRATRANS and INTRA respectively). Similar findings were found in the deep/subcortical WM (p = 0.001 for all). Compared to non-perivenular lesions, (i) perivenular lesions located in periventricular areas showed a more severe fiber disruption (p = 0.001), (ii) perivenular lesions located in juxtacortical and infratentorial regions exhibited a higher degree of inflammation (p = 0.01 and p = 0.05 respectively) and (iii) perivenular lesions located in infratentorial areas showed a higher degree of demyelination (p = 0.04). Discussion Age and migraine have a relevant impact in reducing the percentage of perivenular lesions, particularly in the deep/subcortical WM. SMT may differentiate perivenular lesions, characterized by higher inflammation, demyelination and fiber disruption, from non perivenular lesions, where these pathological processes seemed to be less pronounced. The development of new non-perivenular lesions, especially in the deep/subcortical WM of older patients, should be considered a "red flag" for a different -other than MS- pathophysiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caterina Lapucci
- HNSR, IRRCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Francesco Tazza
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Giacomo Boffa
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Elvira Sbragia
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Nicolò Bruschi
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Mancuso
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Nicola Mavilio
- Department of Neuroradiology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Alessio Signori
- Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Luca Roccatagliata
- Department of Neuroradiology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Maria Cellerino
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Simona Schiavi
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Matilde Inglese
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino IRCCS, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bachhuber A. [Diagnostic work-up, findings, and documentation of multiple sclerosis]. RADIOLOGIE (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2023; 63:115-119. [PMID: 36658297 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-022-01104-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although multiple sclerosis is the most common chronic inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system, the rate of misdiagnosis in clinical practice is high. This is usually due to the inadequate application of the McDonald criteria and misinterpretation of images. OBJECTIVE This review focuses on typical clinical symptoms, choice of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences, correct application of the McDonald criteria, and finally interpretation of the images.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Armin Bachhuber
- Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle, Neuroradiologie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Kirrberger Straße, 66424, Homburg-Saar, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Daboul L, O'Donnell CM, Cao Q, Amin M, Rodrigues P, Derbyshire J, Azevedo C, Bar-Or A, Caverzasi E, Calabresi P, Cree BAC, Freeman L, Henry RG, Longbrake EE, Nakamura K, Oh J, Papinutto N, Pelletier D, Samudralwar RD, Suthiphosuwan S, Schindler MK, Sotirchos ES, Sicotte NL, Solomon AJ, Shinohara RT, Reich DS, Ontaneda D, Sati P. Effect of GBCA Use on Detection and Diagnostic Performance of the Central Vein Sign: Evaluation Using a 3-T FLAIR* Sequence in Patients With Suspected Multiple Sclerosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2023; 220:115-125. [PMID: 35975888 PMCID: PMC10016223 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.22.27731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND. The central vein sign (CVS) is a proposed MRI biomarker of multiple sclerosis (MS). The impact of gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) administration on CVS evaluation remains poorly investigated. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of GBCA use on CVS detection and on the diagnostic performance of the CVS for MS using a 3-T FLAIR* sequence. METHODS. This study was a secondary analysis of data from the pilot study for the prospective multicenter Central Vein Sign: A Diagnostic Biomarker in Multiple Sclerosis (CAVS-MS), which recruited adults with suspected MS from April 2018 to February 2020. Participants underwent 3-T brain MRI including FLAIR and precontrast and post-contrast echo-planar imaging T2*-weighted acquisitions. Postprocessing was used to generate combined FLAIR and T2*-weighted images (hereafter, FLAIR*). MS diagnoses were established using the 2017 McDonald criteria. Thirty participants (23 women, seven men; mean age, 45 years) were randomly selected from the CAVS-MS pilot study cohort. White matter lesions (WMLs) were marked using FLAIR* images. A single observer, blinded to clinical data and GBCA use, reviewed marked WMLs on FLAIR* images for the presence of the CVS. RESULTS. Thirteen of 30 participants had MS. Across participants, on precontrast FLAIR* imaging, 218 CVS-positive and 517 CVS-negative WMLs were identified; on post-contrast FLAIR* imaging, 269 CVS-positive and 459 CVS-negative WMLs were identified. The fraction of WMLs that were CVS-positive on precontrast and postcontrast images was 48% and 58% in participants with MS and 7% and 10% in participants without MS, respectively. The median patient-level CVS-positivity rate on precontrast and postcontrast images was 43% and 67% for participants with MS and 4% and 8% for participants without MS, respectively. In a binomial model adjusting for MS diagnoses, GBCA use was associated with an increased likelihood of at least one CVS-positive WML (odds ratio, 1.6; p < .001). At a 40% CVS-positivity threshold, the sensitivity of the CVS for MS increased from 62% on precontrast images to 92% on postcontrast images (p = .046). Specificity was not significantly different between precontrast (88%) and postcontrast (82%) images (p = .32). CONCLUSION. GBCA use increased CVS detection on FLAIR* images, thereby increasing the sensitivity of the CVS for MS diagnoses. CLINICAL IMPACT. The postcontrast FLAIR* sequence should be considered for CVS evaluation in future investigational trials and clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynn Daboul
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, Bethesda, MD
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH
| | - Carly M O'Donnell
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Quy Cao
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Moein Amin
- Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | | | | | - Christina Azevedo
- Department of Neurology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Amit Bar-Or
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Eduardo Caverzasi
- Department of Neurology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Peter Calabresi
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Bruce A C Cree
- Department of Neurology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Leorah Freeman
- Department of Neurology, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
| | - Roland G Henry
- Department of Neurology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Kunio Nakamura
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Jiwon Oh
- Division of Neurology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nico Papinutto
- Department of Neurology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Daniel Pelletier
- Department of Neurology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Rohini D Samudralwar
- Department of Neurology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | - Suradech Suthiphosuwan
- Department of Medical Imaging, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Matthew K Schindler
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Nancy L Sicotte
- Department of Neurology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Andrew J Solomon
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Larner College of Medicine, The University of Vermont, Burlington, VT
| | - Russell T Shinohara
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Daniel S Reich
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, Bethesda, MD
| | - Daniel Ontaneda
- Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Pascal Sati
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, Bethesda, MD
- Department of Neurology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mey GM, Mahajan KR, DeSilva TM. Neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis. WIREs Mech Dis 2023; 15:e1583. [PMID: 35948371 PMCID: PMC9839517 DOI: 10.1002/wsbm.1583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Revised: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Axonal loss in multiple sclerosis (MS) is a key component of disease progression and permanent neurologic disability. MS is a heterogeneous demyelinating and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system (CNS) with varying presentation, disease courses, and prognosis. Immunomodulatory therapies reduce the frequency and severity of inflammatory demyelinating events that are a hallmark of MS, but there is minimal therapy to treat progressive disease and there is no cure. Data from patients with MS, post-mortem histological analysis, and animal models of demyelinating disease have elucidated patterns of MS pathogenesis and underlying mechanisms of neurodegeneration. MRI and molecular biomarkers have been proposed to identify predictors of neurodegeneration and risk factors for disease progression. Early signs of axonal dysfunction have come to light including impaired mitochondrial trafficking, structural axonal changes, and synaptic alterations. With sustained inflammation as well as impaired remyelination, axons succumb to degeneration contributing to CNS atrophy and worsening of disease. These studies highlight the role of chronic demyelination in the CNS in perpetuating axonal loss, and the difficulty in promoting remyelination and repair amidst persistent inflammatory insult. Regenerative and neuroprotective strategies are essential to overcome this barrier, with early intervention being critical to rescue axonal integrity and function. The clinical and basic research studies discussed in this review have set the stage for identifying key propagators of neurodegeneration in MS, leading the way for neuroprotective therapeutic development. This article is categorized under: Immune System Diseases > Molecular and Cellular Physiology Neurological Diseases > Molecular and Cellular Physiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabrielle M. Mey
- Department of NeurosciencesLerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, and Case Western Reserve UniversityClevelandOhioUSA
| | - Kedar R. Mahajan
- Department of NeurosciencesLerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, and Case Western Reserve UniversityClevelandOhioUSA
- Mellen Center for MS Treatment and ResearchNeurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic FoundationClevelandOhioUSA
| | - Tara M. DeSilva
- Department of NeurosciencesLerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, and Case Western Reserve UniversityClevelandOhioUSA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Yavaş HG, Sağtaş E. Central vein sign: comparison of multiple sclerosis and leukoaraiosis. Turk J Med Sci 2022; 52:1933-1942. [PMID: 36945994 PMCID: PMC10390208 DOI: 10.55730/1300-0144.5541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Leukoaraiosis produces white matter lesions (WML) similar to multiple sclerosis (MS) on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and the distinction between these two conditions is difficult radiologically. This study aimed to investigate the role of the central vein sign (CVS) in susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) sequence in distinguishing MS lesions from leukoaraiosis lesions in Turkish population. METHODS In this prospective study, axial SWI and sagittal three-dimensional fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (3DFLAIR) were obtained in 374 consecutive patients. The study consisted of 169 (89 MS patients, 80 patients with leukoaraiosis) patients according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two observers evaluated MR images by consensus, and observers were unaware of the patient's clinical findings. Locations (periventricular, juxtacortical, and deep white matter) and the presence of CVS were investigated for each of the lesions. Differences between patients in the leukoaraiosis and MS groups were investigated using the Mann-Whitney U test or chi-square analysis. In addition, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to analyze the diagnostic performance of CVS. RESULTS A total of 1908 WMLs (1265 MS lesions, 643 leukoaraiosis) were detected in 169 patients. The CVS was significantly higher in the MS lesions (p < 0.001). The CVS positivity rate in periventricular WMLs was higher than in juxtacortical WMLs or deep WMLs, both for all patients and for patients with MS (p < 0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) of the ROC analysis was 0.88 (95% confidence interval 0.83-0.93) for CVS in the distinction of MS lesions and leukoaraiosis. DISCUSSION The presence of CVS in the SWI sequence can be used as an auxiliary finding for the diagnosis of MS in the differentiation of MS and leukoaraiosis lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hüseyin Gökhan Yavaş
- Department of Radiology, Ahi Evran University Kırşehir Education and Research Hospital, Kırşehir, Turkey
| | - Ergin Sağtaş
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Martire MS, Moiola L, Rocca MA, Filippi M, Absinta M. What is the potential of paramagnetic rim lesions as diagnostic indicators in multiple sclerosis? Expert Rev Neurother 2022; 22:829-837. [PMID: 36342396 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2022.2143265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In multiple sclerosis (MS), paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs) on MRI identify a subset of chronic active lesions (CALs), which have been linked through clinical and pathological studies to more severe disease course and greater disability accumulation. Beside their prognostic relevance, increasing evidence supports the use of PRL as a diagnostic biomarker. AREAS COVERED This review summarizes the most recent updates regarding the MRI pathophysiology of PRL, their prevalence in MS (by clinical phenotypes) vs mimicking conditions, and their potential role as diagnostic MS biomarkers. We searched PubMed with terms including 'multiple sclerosis' AND 'paramagnetic rim lesions' OR 'iron rim lesions' OR 'rim lesions' for manuscripts published between January 2008 and July 2022. EXPERT OPINION Current research suggests that PRL can improve the diagnostic specificity and the overall accuracy of MS diagnosis when used together with the dissemination in space MRI criteria and the central vein sign. Nevertheless, future prospective multicenter studies should further define the real-world prevalence and specificity of PRL. International guidelines are needed to establish methodological criteria for PRL identification before its implementation into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lucia Moiola
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Assunta Rocca
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Division of Neuroscience, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Filippi
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Division of Neuroscience, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.,Neurophysiology Service, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Neurorehabilitation Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Martina Absinta
- Division of Neuroscience, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.,Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
La Rosa F, Wynen M, Al-Louzi O, Beck ES, Huelnhagen T, Maggi P, Thiran JP, Kober T, Shinohara RT, Sati P, Reich DS, Granziera C, Absinta M, Bach Cuadra M. Cortical lesions, central vein sign, and paramagnetic rim lesions in multiple sclerosis: Emerging machine learning techniques and future avenues. Neuroimage Clin 2022; 36:103205. [PMID: 36201950 PMCID: PMC9668629 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Revised: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The current diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis (MS) lack specificity, and this may lead to misdiagnosis, which remains an issue in present-day clinical practice. In addition, conventional biomarkers only moderately correlate with MS disease progression. Recently, some MS lesional imaging biomarkers such as cortical lesions (CL), the central vein sign (CVS), and paramagnetic rim lesions (PRL), visible in specialized magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences, have shown higher specificity in differential diagnosis. Moreover, studies have shown that CL and PRL are potential prognostic biomarkers, the former correlating with cognitive impairments and the latter with early disability progression. As machine learning-based methods have achieved extraordinary performance in the assessment of conventional imaging biomarkers, such as white matter lesion segmentation, several automated or semi-automated methods have been proposed as well for CL, PRL, and CVS. In the present review, we first introduce these MS biomarkers and their imaging methods. Subsequently, we describe the corresponding machine learning-based methods that were proposed to tackle these clinical questions, putting them into context with respect to the challenges they are facing, including non-standardized MRI protocols, limited datasets, and moderate inter-rater variability. We conclude by presenting the current limitations that prevent their broader deployment and suggesting future research directions.
Collapse
Key Words
- ms, multiple sclerosis
- mri, magnetic resonance imaging
- dl, deep learning
- ml, machine learning
- cl, cortical lesions
- prl, paramagnetic rim lesions
- cvs, central vein sign
- wml, white matter lesions
- flair, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery
- mprage, magnetization prepared rapid gradient-echo
- gm, gray matter
- wm, white matter
- psir, phase-sensitive inversion recovery
- dir, double inversion recovery
- mp2rage, magnetization-prepared 2 rapid gradient echoes
- sels, slowly evolving/expanding lesions
- cnn, convolutional neural network
- xai, explainable ai
- pv, partial volume
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco La Rosa
- Signal Processing Laboratory (LTS5), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland; CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging, Switzerland; Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Maxence Wynen
- CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging, Switzerland; ICTeam, UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium; Louvain Inflammation Imaging Lab (NIL), Institute of Neuroscience (IoNS), UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium; Radiology Department, Lausanne University and University Hospital, Switzerland
| | - Omar Al-Louzi
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA; Department of Neurology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Erin S Beck
- Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Till Huelnhagen
- Signal Processing Laboratory (LTS5), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland; Radiology Department, Lausanne University and University Hospital, Switzerland; Advanced Clinical Imaging Technology, Siemens Healthcare AG, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Pietro Maggi
- Louvain Inflammation Imaging Lab (NIL), Institute of Neuroscience (IoNS), UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Neurology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Neurology, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean-Philippe Thiran
- Signal Processing Laboratory (LTS5), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland; CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging, Switzerland; Radiology Department, Lausanne University and University Hospital, Switzerland
| | - Tobias Kober
- Signal Processing Laboratory (LTS5), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland; Radiology Department, Lausanne University and University Hospital, Switzerland; Advanced Clinical Imaging Technology, Siemens Healthcare AG, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Russell T Shinohara
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analysis (CBICA), Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Endeavor (PennSIVE), Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Pascal Sati
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA; Department of Neurology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Daniel S Reich
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Cristina Granziera
- Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINk) Basel, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Switzerland; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, MS Center and Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Martina Absinta
- IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Meritxell Bach Cuadra
- CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging, Switzerland; Radiology Department, Lausanne University and University Hospital, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kolb H, Al-Louzi O, Beck ES, Sati P, Absinta M, Reich DS. From pathology to MRI and back: Clinically relevant biomarkers of multiple sclerosis lesions. Neuroimage Clin 2022; 36:103194. [PMID: 36170753 PMCID: PMC9668624 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Revised: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Focal lesions in both white and gray matter are characteristic of multiple sclerosis (MS). Histopathological studies have helped define the main underlying pathological processes involved in lesion formation and evolution, serving as a gold standard for many years. However, histopathology suffers from an intrinsic bias resulting from over-reliance on tissue samples from late stages of the disease or atypical cases and is inadequate for routine patient assessment. Pathological-radiological correlative studies have established advanced MRI's sensitivity to several relevant MS-pathological substrates and its practicality for assessing dynamic changes and following lesions over time. This review focuses on novel imaging techniques that serve as biomarkers of critical pathological substrates of MS lesions: the central vein, chronic inflammation, remyelination and repair, and cortical lesions. For each pathological process, we address the correlative value of MRI to MS pathology, its contribution in elucidating MS pathology in vivo, and the clinical utility of the imaging biomarker.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hadar Kolb
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA,Department of Neurology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv-Yaffo, Israel,Corresponding author at: Department of Neurology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv-Yaffo, Israel.
| | - Omar Al-Louzi
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA,Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Erin S. Beck
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA,Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Pascal Sati
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA,Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Martina Absinta
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA,Institute of Experimental Neurology (INSPE), IRCSS San Raffaele Hospital and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy,Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Daniel S. Reich
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) can be made based on clinical symptoms and signs alone or a combination of clinical and paraclinical features. Diagnostic criteria for MS have evolved over time, and the latest version facilitates earlier diagnosis of MS in those presenting with typical clinical syndromes. This article summarizes the current diagnostic criteria for MS, typical and atypical presentations of MS, and when diagnostic criteria should be applied with caution. RECENT FINDINGS The most recent version of the MS diagnostic criteria has the benefits of simplicity and greater sensitivity in comparison to previous iterations. However, misdiagnosis remains a significant issue in MS clinical care, even at MS specialty centers. It is, therefore, evident that careful clinical application of the current version of the diagnostic criteria is necessary and that tools improving the diagnostic accuracy of MS would be of substantial clinical utility. Emerging diagnostic biomarkers that may be useful in this regard, including the central vein sign, paramagnetic rim lesions, and fluid biomarkers, are discussed. SUMMARY Current MS diagnostic criteria facilitate the early diagnosis of MS in people presenting with typical clinical syndromes but should be used cautiously in those presenting with atypical syndromes and in special populations. Clinical judgment and existing paraclinical tools, including sequential MRIs of the neuraxis and laboratory tests, are useful in minimizing misdiagnosis and facilitating the accurate diagnosis of MS. Diagnostic biomarkers that may facilitate or refute a diagnosis of MS in these settings, and emerging imaging and fluid biomarkers may eventually become available for use in clinical settings.
Collapse
|
21
|
Al-Louzi O, Manukyan S, Donadieu M, Absinta M, Letchuman V, Calabresi B, Desai P, Beck ES, Roy S, Ohayon J, Pham DL, Thomas A, Jacobson S, Cortese I, Auluck PK, Nair G, Sati P, Reich DS. Lesion size and shape in central vein sign assessment for multiple sclerosis diagnosis: An in vivo and postmortem MRI study. Mult Scler 2022; 28:1891-1902. [PMID: 35674284 DOI: 10.1177/13524585221097560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The "central vein sign" (CVS), a linear hypointensity on T2*-weighted imaging corresponding to a central vein/venule, is associated with multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions. The effect of lesion-size exclusion criteria on MS diagnostic accuracy has not been extensively studied. OBJECTIVE Investigate the optimal lesion-size exclusion criteria for CVS use in MS diagnosis. METHODS Cross-sectional study of 163 MS and 51 non-MS, and radiological/histopathological correlation of 5 MS and 1 control autopsy cases. The effects of lesion-size exclusion on MS diagnosis using the CVS, and intralesional vein detection on histopathology were evaluated. RESULTS CVS+ lesions were larger compared to CVS- lesions, with effect modification by MS diagnosis (mean difference +7.7 mm3, p = 0.004). CVS percentage-based criteria with no lesion-size exclusion showed the highest diagnostic accuracy in differentiating MS cases. However, a simple count of three or more CVS+ lesions greater than 3.5 mm is highly accurate and can be rapidly implemented (sensitivity 93%; specificity 88%). On magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-histopathological correlation, the CVS had high specificity for identifying intralesional veins (0/7 false positives). CONCLUSION Lesion-size measures add important information when using CVS+ lesion counts for MS diagnosis. The CVS is a specific biomarker corresponding to intralesional veins on histopathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omar Al-Louzi
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, USA; Department of Neurology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sargis Manukyan
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, USA; Department of Neurology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Maxime Donadieu
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Martina Absinta
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, USA; Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; USA/IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Vijay Letchuman
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Brent Calabresi
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Parth Desai
- Developmental Therapeutics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Erin S Beck
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, USA; Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Snehashis Roy
- Section on Neural Function, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Joan Ohayon
- Neuroimmunology Clinic, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Dzung L Pham
- Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Anish Thomas
- Developmental Therapeutics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Steven Jacobson
- Viral Immunology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Irene Cortese
- Neuroimmunology Clinic, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Pavan K Auluck
- Human Brain Collection Core, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Govind Nair
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Pascal Sati
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, USA; Department of Neurology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Daniel S Reich
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
MS or not MS: T2-weighted imaging (T2WI)-based radiomic findings distinguish MS from its mimics. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2022; 61:103756. [DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.103756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2021] [Revised: 02/20/2022] [Accepted: 03/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
23
|
Chaaban L, Safwan N, Moussa H, El‐Sammak S, Khoury S, Hannoun S. Central vein sign: A putative diagnostic marker for multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand 2022; 145:279-287. [PMID: 34796472 DOI: 10.1111/ane.13553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2021] [Revised: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
The presence of a "central vein sign" (CVS) has been introduced as a biomarker for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) and shown to have the ability to accurately differentiate MS from other white matter diseases (MS mimics). Following the development of susceptibility-based magnetic resonance venography that allowed the in vivo detection of CVS, a standard CVS definition was established by introducing the "40% rule" that assesses the number of MS lesions with CVS as a fraction of the total number of lesions to differentiate MS lesions from other types of lesions. The "50% rule," the "three-lesion criteria," and the "six-lesion criteria" were later introduced and defined. Each of these rules had high levels of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in differentiating MS from other diseases, which has been recognized by the Magnetic Resonance Imaging in MS (MAGNIMS) group and the Consortium of MS Centers task force. The North American Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis Cooperative even provided statements and recommendations aiming to refine, standardize and evaluate the CVS in MS. Herein, we review the existing literature on CVS and evaluate its added value in the diagnosis of MS and usefulness in differentiating it from other vasculopathies. We also review the histopathology of CVS and identify available automated CVS assessment methods as well as define the role of vascular comorbidities in the diagnosis of MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara Chaaban
- Department of Agriculture and Food Sciences American University of Beirut Beirut Lebanon
| | - Nancy Safwan
- Department of Agriculture and Food Sciences American University of Beirut Beirut Lebanon
| | - Hussein Moussa
- Nehme and Therese Tohme Multiple Sclerosis Center American University of Beirut Medical Center Beirut Lebanon
| | - Sally El‐Sammak
- Nehme and Therese Tohme Multiple Sclerosis Center American University of Beirut Medical Center Beirut Lebanon
| | - Samia J. Khoury
- Nehme and Therese Tohme Multiple Sclerosis Center American University of Beirut Medical Center Beirut Lebanon
- Faculty of Medicine Abu‐Haidar Neuroscience Institute American University of Beirut Medical Center Beirut Lebanon
| | - Salem Hannoun
- Nehme and Therese Tohme Multiple Sclerosis Center American University of Beirut Medical Center Beirut Lebanon
- Medical Imaging Sciences Program Division of Health Professions Faculty of Health Sciences American University of Beirut Beirut Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Al-Louzi O, Letchuman V, Manukyan S, Beck ES, Roy S, Ohayon J, Pham DL, Cortese I, Sati P, Reich DS. Central Vein Sign Profile of Newly Developing Lesions in Multiple Sclerosis: A 3-Year Longitudinal Study. NEUROLOGY(R) NEUROIMMUNOLOGY & NEUROINFLAMMATION 2022; 9:9/2/e1120. [PMID: 35027474 PMCID: PMC8759076 DOI: 10.1212/nxi.0000000000001120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 10/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The central vein sign (CVS), a central linear hypointensity within lesions on T2*-weighted imaging, has been established as a sensitive and specific biomarker for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS). However, the CVS has not yet been comprehensively studied in newly developing MS lesions. We aimed to identify the CVS profiles of new white matter lesions in patients with MS followed over time and investigate demographic and clinical risk factors associated with new CVS+ or CVS- lesion development. METHODS In this retrospective longitudinal cohort study, adults from the NIH MS Natural History Study were considered for inclusion. Participants with new T2 or enhancing lesions were identified through review of the radiology report and/or longitudinal subtraction imaging. Each new lesion was evaluated for the CVS. Clinical characteristics were identified through chart review. RESULTS A total of 153 adults (95 relapsing-remitting MS, 27 secondary progressive MS, 16 primary progressive MS, 5 clinically isolated syndrome, and 10 healthy; 67% female) were included. Of this cohort, 96 had at least 1 new T2 or contrast-enhancing lesion during median 3.1 years (Q1-Q3: 0.7-6.3) of follow-up; lesions eligible for CVS evaluation were found in 62 (65%). Of 233 new CVS-eligible lesions, 159 (68%) were CVS+, with 30 (48%) individuals having only CVS+, 12 (19%) only CVS-, and 20 (32%) both CVS+ and CVS- lesions. In gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+) lesions, the CVS+ percentage increased from 102/152 (67%) at the first time point where the lesion was observed, to 92/114 (82%) after a median follow-up of 2.8 years. Younger age (OR = 0.5 per 10-year increase, 95% CI = 0.3-0.8) and higher CVS+ percentage at baseline (OR = 1.4 per 10% increase, 95% CI = 1.1-1.9) were associated with increased likelihood of new CVS+ lesion development. DISCUSSION In a cohort of adults with MS followed over a median duration of 3 years, most newly developing T2 or enhancing lesions were CVS+ (68%), and nearly half (48%) developed new CVS+ lesions only. Importantly, the effects of edema and T2 signal changes can obscure small veins in Gd+ lesions; therefore, caution and follow-up is necessary when determining their CVS status. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION Clinical trial registration number NCT00001248. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE This study provides Class III evidence that younger age and higher CVS+ percentage at baseline are associated with new CVS+ lesion development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omar Al-Louzi
- From the Translational Neuroradiology Section (O.A.-L., V.L., S.M., E.S.B., P.S., D.S.R.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, Bethesda, MD; Department of Neurology (O.A.-L., P.S.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Section on Neural Function (S.R.), National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Bethesda, MD; Neuroimmunology Clinic (J.O., I.C.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, Bethesda, MD; and Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine (D.L.P.), the Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD
| | - Vijay Letchuman
- From the Translational Neuroradiology Section (O.A.-L., V.L., S.M., E.S.B., P.S., D.S.R.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, Bethesda, MD; Department of Neurology (O.A.-L., P.S.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Section on Neural Function (S.R.), National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Bethesda, MD; Neuroimmunology Clinic (J.O., I.C.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, Bethesda, MD; and Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine (D.L.P.), the Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD
| | - Sargis Manukyan
- From the Translational Neuroradiology Section (O.A.-L., V.L., S.M., E.S.B., P.S., D.S.R.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, Bethesda, MD; Department of Neurology (O.A.-L., P.S.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Section on Neural Function (S.R.), National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Bethesda, MD; Neuroimmunology Clinic (J.O., I.C.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, Bethesda, MD; and Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine (D.L.P.), the Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD
| | - Erin S Beck
- From the Translational Neuroradiology Section (O.A.-L., V.L., S.M., E.S.B., P.S., D.S.R.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, Bethesda, MD; Department of Neurology (O.A.-L., P.S.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Section on Neural Function (S.R.), National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Bethesda, MD; Neuroimmunology Clinic (J.O., I.C.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, Bethesda, MD; and Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine (D.L.P.), the Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD
| | - Snehashis Roy
- From the Translational Neuroradiology Section (O.A.-L., V.L., S.M., E.S.B., P.S., D.S.R.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, Bethesda, MD; Department of Neurology (O.A.-L., P.S.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Section on Neural Function (S.R.), National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Bethesda, MD; Neuroimmunology Clinic (J.O., I.C.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, Bethesda, MD; and Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine (D.L.P.), the Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD
| | - Joan Ohayon
- From the Translational Neuroradiology Section (O.A.-L., V.L., S.M., E.S.B., P.S., D.S.R.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, Bethesda, MD; Department of Neurology (O.A.-L., P.S.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Section on Neural Function (S.R.), National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Bethesda, MD; Neuroimmunology Clinic (J.O., I.C.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, Bethesda, MD; and Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine (D.L.P.), the Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD
| | - Dzung L Pham
- From the Translational Neuroradiology Section (O.A.-L., V.L., S.M., E.S.B., P.S., D.S.R.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, Bethesda, MD; Department of Neurology (O.A.-L., P.S.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Section on Neural Function (S.R.), National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Bethesda, MD; Neuroimmunology Clinic (J.O., I.C.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, Bethesda, MD; and Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine (D.L.P.), the Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD
| | - Irene Cortese
- From the Translational Neuroradiology Section (O.A.-L., V.L., S.M., E.S.B., P.S., D.S.R.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, Bethesda, MD; Department of Neurology (O.A.-L., P.S.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Section on Neural Function (S.R.), National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Bethesda, MD; Neuroimmunology Clinic (J.O., I.C.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, Bethesda, MD; and Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine (D.L.P.), the Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD
| | - Pascal Sati
- From the Translational Neuroradiology Section (O.A.-L., V.L., S.M., E.S.B., P.S., D.S.R.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, Bethesda, MD; Department of Neurology (O.A.-L., P.S.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Section on Neural Function (S.R.), National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Bethesda, MD; Neuroimmunology Clinic (J.O., I.C.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, Bethesda, MD; and Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine (D.L.P.), the Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD
| | - Daniel S Reich
- From the Translational Neuroradiology Section (O.A.-L., V.L., S.M., E.S.B., P.S., D.S.R.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, Bethesda, MD; Department of Neurology (O.A.-L., P.S.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Section on Neural Function (S.R.), National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Bethesda, MD; Neuroimmunology Clinic (J.O., I.C.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, Bethesda, MD; and Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine (D.L.P.), the Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Rath J, Foesleitner O, Haider L, Bickel H, Leutmezer F, Polanec S, Arnoldner MA, Sunder-Plassmann G, Prayer D, Berger T, Rommer P, Kasprian G. Neuroradiological differentiation of white matter lesions in patients with multiple sclerosis and Fabry disease. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2022; 17:37. [PMID: 35123534 PMCID: PMC8817613 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-022-02187-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective White matter lesions (WML) in multiple sclerosis (MS) differ from vascular WML caused by Fabry disease (FD). However, in atypical cases the discrimination can be difficult and may vary between individual raters. The aim of this study was to evaluate interrater reliability of WML differentiation between MS and FD patients. Materials and methods Brain MRI scans of 21 patients with genetically confirmed FD were compared to 21 matched patients with MS. Pseudonymized axial FLAIR sequences were assessed by 6 blinded raters and attributed to either the MS or the FD group to investigate interrater reliability. Additionally, localization of WML was compared between the two groups. Results The median age of patients was 46 years (IQR 35–58). Interrater reliability was moderate with a Fleiss' Kappa of 0.45 (95%CI 0.3–0.59). Overall, 85% of all ratings in the MS group and 75% in the FD group were correct. However, only 38% of patients with MS and 33% of patients with FD were correctly identified by all 6 raters. WML involving the corpus callosum (p < 0.001) as well as juxtacortical (p < 0.001) and infratentorial lesions (p = 0.03) were more frequently observed in MS patients. Conclusion Interrater reliability regarding visual differentiation of WML in MS from vascular WML in FD on standard axial FLAIR images alone is only moderate, despite the distinctive features of lesions in each group.
Collapse
|
26
|
Reichl M, Wittayer M, Weber CE, Platten M, Gass A, Eisele P. Consistency of the "central vein sign" in chronic multiple sclerosis lesions. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2022; 58:103530. [PMID: 35066270 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.103530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Revised: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/14/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in the central vein sign (CVS) as a new imaging marker and previous cross-sectional studies demonstrated that the CVS has the potential to discriminate multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions from non-MS lesions. The aim of this study was to investigate the consistency of the CVS in a longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data set. METHODS 3T MRI datasets from seventy-one people with MS acquired at baseline and after 12 months-follow-up were analyzed. Chronic lesions were identified on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images. Co-registered susceptibility-weighted/FLAIR images were analyzed for the presence of a CVS at baseline and follow-up. RESULTS A total of 183 chronic lesions were included in the final analysis. At baseline MRI, a CVS was detectable in 141/183 (77%) lesions. Overall, the CVS was consistent in 114/141 (81%) lesions (Cohen's kappa = 0.46, standard error = 0.07). CONCLUSION The CVS is a rather stable feature in chronic MS lesions and therefore represents a robust imaging marker that could increase the specificity of MRI in MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Reichl
- Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty Mannheim and Mannheim Center of Translational Neurosciences (MCTN), Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1 - 3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Matthias Wittayer
- Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty Mannheim and Mannheim Center of Translational Neurosciences (MCTN), Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1 - 3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Claudia E Weber
- Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty Mannheim and Mannheim Center of Translational Neurosciences (MCTN), Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1 - 3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Michael Platten
- Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty Mannheim and Mannheim Center of Translational Neurosciences (MCTN), Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1 - 3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Achim Gass
- Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty Mannheim and Mannheim Center of Translational Neurosciences (MCTN), Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1 - 3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Philipp Eisele
- Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty Mannheim and Mannheim Center of Translational Neurosciences (MCTN), Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1 - 3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
The central vein sign helps in differentiating multiple sclerosis from its mimickers: lessons from Fabry disease. Eur Radiol 2022; 32:3846-3854. [PMID: 35029733 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08487-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Revised: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Although the use of specific MRI criteria has significantly increased the diagnostic accuracy of multiple sclerosis (MS), reaching a correct neuroradiological diagnosis remains a challenging task, and therefore the search for new imaging biomarkers is crucial. This study aims to evaluate the incidence of one of the emerging neuroradiological signs highly suggestive of MS, the central vein sign (CVS), using data from Fabry disease (FD) patients as an index of microvascular disorder that could mimic MS. METHODS In this retrospective study, after the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, MRI scans of 36 FD patients and 73 relapsing-remitting (RR) MS patients were evaluated. Among the RRMS participants, 32 subjects with a disease duration inferior to 5 years (early MS) were also analyzed. For all subjects, a Fazekas score (FS) was recorded, excluding patients with FS = 0. Different neuroradiological signs, including CVS, were evaluated on FLAIR T2-weighted and spoiled gradient recalled echo sequences. RESULTS Among all the recorded neuroradiological signs, the most striking difference was found for the CVS, with a detectable prevalence of 78.1% (57/73) in RRMS and of 71.4% (25/32) in early MS patients, while this sign was absent in FD (0/36). CONCLUSIONS Our results confirm the high incidence of CVS in MS, also in the early phases of the disease, while it seems to be absent in conditions with a different etiology. These results corroborate the possible role of CVS as a useful neuroradiological sign highly suggestive of MS. KEY POINTS • The search for new imaging biomarkers is crucial to achieve a correct neuroradiological diagnosis of MS. • The CVS shows an incidence superior to 70% in MS patients, even in the early phases of the disease, while it appears to be absent in FD. • These findings further corroborate the possible future central role of CVS in distinguishing between MS and its mimickers.
Collapse
|
28
|
Belov S, Boyko A. A symptom of the central vein in various diseases and protocols of MRI examination. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova 2022; 122:19-26. [DOI: 10.17116/jnevro202212207219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
29
|
Abdel Ghany H, Karam-Allah A, Edward R, Abdel Naseer M, Hegazy MI. Sensitivity and Specificity of Central Vein Sign as a Diagnostic Biomarker in Egyptian Patients with Multiple Sclerosis. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2022; 18:1985-1992. [PMID: 36072679 PMCID: PMC9444024 DOI: 10.2147/ndt.s377877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in multiple sclerosis (MS) overlap with numerous MS mimics. The central vein sign (CVS) can help to differentiate MS from other mimics. This study aimed to determine the value of CVS as a diagnostic biomarker for distinguishing MS from its mimics. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were prospectively recruited into two groups: a typical clinical (TC) MS presentation with an atypical MRI for MS and an atypical clinical (ATC) MS presentation with a typical MRI for MS. Patients underwent a 1.5T MRI brain scan with a T2*-weighted gradient-echo sequence. The presence of the central vein was assessed by a radiologist blinded to patients' clinical presentation. The MS consultant made the final diagnosis without reviewing the T2*-weighted gradient-echo sequence or the CVS analysis results. RESULTS Forty-two patients were included. Ten (40%) out of 25 TC patients were diagnosed with clinically definite MS (CDMS), with a mean percentage of CV-positive lesions of 65.5% among CDMS patients. Four (23.5%) out of 17 ATC patients were diagnosed with CDMS with a mean CV-positive lesions percentage of 68.25% among CDMS patients. TC patients who were not diagnosed as CDMS had a mean CV-positive lesions percentage of 10.13%, while ATC patients who were not diagnosed as CDMS had a mean CV-positive lesions percentage of 16.38%. The CVS showed 85.7% sensitivity and 100% specificity (95% confidence interval: 0.919-1.018) for diagnosis of MS at a cut off value of 45% (p < 0.001). The percentage of CV-positive lesions was significantly higher in oligoclonal bands (OCBs) positive patients compared to OCBs negative patients (p < 0.001) and those with spinal cord lesions compared to patients with no spinal cord lesions (p = 0.017). CONCLUSION The CVS has 85.7% sensitivity and 100% specificity for the diagnosis of MS at a cutoff value of 45%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hend Abdel Ghany
- Neurology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Ahmed Karam-Allah
- Neurology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Ramy Edward
- Radiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Maged Abdel Naseer
- Neurology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Mohamed I Hegazy
- Neurology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ontaneda D, Sati P, Raza P, Kilbane M, Gombos E, Alvarez E, Azevedo C, Calabresi P, Cohen JA, Freeman L, Henry RG, Longbrake EE, Mitra N, Illenberger N, Schindler M, Moreno-Dominguez D, Ramos M, Mowry E, Oh J, Rodrigues P, Chahin S, Kaisey M, Waubant E, Cutter G, Shinohara R, Reich DS, Solomon A, Sicotte NL. Central vein sign: A diagnostic biomarker in multiple sclerosis (CAVS-MS) study protocol for a prospective multicenter trial. Neuroimage Clin 2021; 32:102834. [PMID: 34592690 PMCID: PMC8482479 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Revised: 09/16/2021] [Accepted: 09/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
The specificity and implementation of current MRI-based diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis (MS) are imperfect. Approximately 1 in 5 of individuals diagnosed with MS are eventually determined not to have the disease, with overreliance on MRI findings a major cause of MS misdiagnosis. The central vein sign (CVS), a proposed MRI biomarker for MS lesions, has been extensively studied in numerous cross sectional studies and may increase diagnostic specificity for MS. CVS has desirable analytical, measurement, and scalability properties. "Central Vein Sign: A Diagnostic Biomarker in Multiple Sclerosis (CAVS-MS)" is an NIH-supported, 2-year, prospective, international, multicenter study conducted by the North American Imaging in MS Cooperative (NAIMS) to evaluate CVS as a diagnostic biomarker for immediate translation into clinical care. Study objectives include determining the concordance of CVS and McDonald Criteria to diagnose MS, the sensitivity of CVS to detect MS in those with typical presentations, and the specificity of CVS among those with atypical presentations. The study will recruit a total of 400 participants (200 with typical and 200 with atypical presentations) across 11 sites. T2*-weighted, high-isotropic-resolution, segmented echo-planar MRI will be acquired at baseline and 24 months on 3-tesla scanners, and FLAIR* images (combination of FLAIR and T2*) will be generated for evaluating CVS. Data will be processed on a cloud-based platform that contains clinical and CVS rating modules. Imaging quality control will be conducted by automated methods and neuroradiologist review. CVS will be determined by Select6* and Select3* lesion methods following published criteria at each site and by central readers, including neurologists and neuroradiologists. Automated CVS detection and algorithms for incorporation of CVS into McDonald Criteria will be tested. Diagnosis will be adjudicated by three neurologists who served on the 2017 International Panel on the Diagnosis of MS. The CAVS-MS study aims to definitively establish CVS as a diagnostic biomarker that can be applied broadly to individuals presenting for evaluation of the diagnosis of MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Ontaneda
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, United States.
| | - P Sati
- Cedars Sinai, Los Angeles, CA, United States; NINDS, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - P Raza
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - M Kilbane
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - E Gombos
- Cedars Sinai, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - E Alvarez
- Neurology, U of Colorado, Denver, CO, United States
| | | | - P Calabresi
- Neurology, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - J A Cohen
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - L Freeman
- Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
| | - R G Henry
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | | | - N Mitra
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - N Illenberger
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - M Schindler
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | | | - M Ramos
- QMENTA Inc, Boston, MA, United States
| | - E Mowry
- Neurology, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - J Oh
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - S Chahin
- Washington University, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - M Kaisey
- Cedars Sinai, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - E Waubant
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - G Cutter
- UAB School of Public Health, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - R Shinohara
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - D S Reich
- NINDS, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - A Solomon
- The University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States
| | - N L Sicotte
- Cedars Sinai, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Shadmani G, Simkins TJ, Assadsangabi R, Apperson M, Hacein-Bey L, Raslan O, Ivanovic V. Autoimmune diseases of the brain, imaging and clinical review. Neuroradiol J 2021; 35:152-169. [PMID: 34490814 DOI: 10.1177/19714009211042879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
There is an extensive spectrum of autoimmune entities that can involve the central nervous system, which has expanded with the emergence of new imaging modalities and several clinicopathologic entities. Clinical presentation is usually non-specific, and imaging has a critical role in the workup of these diseases. Immune-mediated diseases of the brain are not common in daily practice for radiologists and, except for a few of them such as multiple sclerosis, there is a vague understanding about differentiating them from each other based on the radiological findings. In this review, we aim to provide a practical diagnostic approach based on the unique radiological findings for each disease. We hope our diagnostic approach will help radiologists expand their basic understanding of the discussed disease entities and narrow the differential diagnosis in specific clinical scenarios. An understanding of unique imaging features of these disorders, along with laboratory evaluation, may enable clinicians to decrease the need for tissue biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ghazal Shadmani
- Department of Radiology, Section of Neuroradiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, USA
| | - Tyrell J Simkins
- Department of Neurology (Neuroimmunulogy), University of California Davis Medical center, USA
| | - Reza Assadsangabi
- Department of Radiology, Section of Neuroradiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, USA
| | - Michelle Apperson
- Department of Neurology (Neuroimmunulogy), University of California Davis Medical center, USA
| | - Lotfi Hacein-Bey
- Department of Radiology, Section of Neuroradiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, USA
| | - Osama Raslan
- Department of Radiology, Section of Neuroradiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, USA
| | - Vladimir Ivanovic
- Department of Radiology, Section of Neuroradiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Rovira À, Auger C. Beyond McDonald: updated perspectives on MRI diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Expert Rev Neurother 2021; 21:895-911. [PMID: 34275399 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2021.1957832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an essential paraclinical test to establish an accurate and early diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS), which is based on the application of the McDonald criteria. AREAS COVERED The objective of this article is to analyze, based on publicly available database since the publication of the 2017 McDonald diagnostic criteria, the clinical impact of these criteria, to discuss the potential inclusion within these criteria of the optic nerve to demonstrate dissemination in space, and to guide the acquisition and interpretation of MRI scans for diagnostic purposes. Finally, the authors will review emerging MRI features that could improve the specificity of MRI in the diagnosis of MS and consequently minimize the misdiagnosis of this disease. EXPERT OPINION Although the optic nerve has not been included as one of the topographies required to demonstrate demyelinating lesion disseminated in space in the 2017 McDonald criteria, new studies seem to show some improvement in the sensitivity of these criteria when this topography is considered. New radiological findings such as the central vein sign and iron rims, should be considered within the typical MRI features of this disease with the objective of minimizing MRI-based diagnostic errors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Àlex Rovira
- Section of Neuroradiology (Department of Radiology), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma De Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Vall d´Hebron Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cristina Auger
- Section of Neuroradiology (Department of Radiology), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma De Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Vall d´Hebron Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Tortora M, Tranfa M, D’Elia AC, Pontillo G, Petracca M, Bozzao A, Caranci F, Cervo A, Cosottini M, Falini A, Longo M, Manara R, Muto M, Porcu M, Roccatagliata L, Todeschini A, Saba L, Brunetti A, Cocozza S, Elefante A. Walk Your Talk: Real-World Adherence to Guidelines on the Use of MRI in Multiple Sclerosis. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11081310. [PMID: 34441245 PMCID: PMC8394408 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11081310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2021] [Revised: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Although guidelines about the use of MRI sequences for Multiple Sclerosis (MS) diagnosis and follow-up are available, variability in acquisition protocols is not uncommon in everyday clinical practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the real-world application of MS imaging guidelines in different settings to clarify the level of adherence to these guidelines. (2) Via an on-line anonymous survey, neuroradiologists (NR) were asked about MRI protocols and parameters routinely acquired when MS patients are evaluated in their center, both at diagnosis and follow-up. Furthermore, data about report content and personal opinions about emerging neuroimaging markers were also retrieved. (3) A total of 46 participants were included, mostly working in a hospital or university hospital (80.4%) and with more than 10 years of experience (47.9%). We found a relatively good adherence to the suggested MRI protocols regarding the use of T2-weighted sequences, although almost 10% of the participants routinely acquired 2D sequences with a slice thickness superior to 3 mm. On the other hand, a wider degree of heterogeneity was found regarding gadolinium administration, almost routinely performed at follow-up examination (87.0% of cases) in contrast with the current guidelines, as well as a low use of a standardized reporting system (17.4% of cases). (4) Although the MS community is getting closer to a standardization of MRI protocols, there is still a relatively wide heterogeneity among NR, with particular reference to contrast administration, which must be overcome to guarantee an adequate quality of patients’ care in MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Tortora
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (M.T.); (M.T.); (A.C.D.); (G.P.); (A.B.); (A.E.)
| | - Mario Tranfa
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (M.T.); (M.T.); (A.C.D.); (G.P.); (A.B.); (A.E.)
| | - Anna Chiara D’Elia
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (M.T.); (M.T.); (A.C.D.); (G.P.); (A.B.); (A.E.)
| | - Giuseppe Pontillo
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (M.T.); (M.T.); (A.C.D.); (G.P.); (A.B.); (A.E.)
| | - Maria Petracca
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy;
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Bozzao
- Neuroradiology Unit, NESMOS Department, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy;
| | - Ferdinando Caranci
- Department of Medicine of Precision, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy;
| | - Amedeo Cervo
- Department of Neuroradiology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, 20121 Milan, Italy;
| | - Mirco Cosottini
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy;
| | - Andrea Falini
- Neuroradiology Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and University, 20132 Milan, Italy;
| | - Marcello Longo
- Neuroradiology Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, 98124 Messina, Italy;
| | - Renzo Manara
- Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, 35121 Padua, Italy;
| | - Mario Muto
- Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Cardarelli Hospital, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Michele Porcu
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.) di Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy; (M.P.); (L.S.)
| | - Luca Roccatagliata
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Genova, 16132 Genova, Italy;
- Neuroradiology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy
| | - Alessandra Todeschini
- Neuroradiology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Nuovo Ospedale Civile S. Agostino Estense, 41126 Modena, Italy;
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.) di Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy; (M.P.); (L.S.)
| | - Arturo Brunetti
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (M.T.); (M.T.); (A.C.D.); (G.P.); (A.B.); (A.E.)
| | - Sirio Cocozza
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (M.T.); (M.T.); (A.C.D.); (G.P.); (A.B.); (A.E.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Andrea Elefante
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (M.T.); (M.T.); (A.C.D.); (G.P.); (A.B.); (A.E.)
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
MRI is a staple of the neurologist's armoury when facing diagnostic challenges. At times, it can reveal or confirm the diagnosis with clarity, at others it brings us no further forwards, or even muddies the water. We rely on the expertise of neuroradiology colleagues to interpret MR images, but the choice of protocol for MR acquisition and its interpretation hinge crucially on the clinical information we provide. Having a degree of understanding about how MRI works, its limitations and pitfalls, can help to optimise what we learn from a scan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Louise MacIver
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK .,Neuroscience and Mental Health Institute, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Sian Ebden
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - Emma C Tallantyre
- Helen Durham Centre for Neuroinflammation, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.,Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To summarize recent evidence from the application of susceptibility-based MRI sequences to investigate the 'central vein sign' (CVS) and 'iron rim' as biomarkers to improve the diagnostic work-up of multiple sclerosis (MS) and predict disease severity. RECENT FINDINGS The CVS is a specific biomarker for MS being detectable from the earliest phase of the disease. A threshold of 40% of lesions with the CVS can be optimal to distinguish MS from non-MS patients. Iron rim lesions, reflecting chronic active lesions, develop in relapsing-remitting MS patients and persist in progressive MS. They increase in size in the first few years after their formation and then stabilize. Iron rim lesions can distinguish MS from non-MS patients but not the different MS phenotypes. The presence of at least four iron rim lesions is associated with an earlier clinical disability, higher prevalence of clinically progressive MS and more severe brain atrophy. Automated methods for CVS and iron rim lesion detection are under development to facilitate their quantification. SUMMARY The assessment of the CVS and iron rim lesions is feasible in the clinical scenario and provides MRI measures specific to MS pathological substrates, improving diagnosis and prognosis of these patients.
Collapse
|
36
|
Haacke EM, Ge Y, Sethi SK, Buch S, Zamboni P. An Overview of Venous Abnormalities Related to the Development of Lesions in Multiple Sclerosis. Front Neurol 2021; 12:561458. [PMID: 33981281 PMCID: PMC8107266 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.561458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The etiology of multiple sclerosis (MS) is currently understood to be autoimmune. However, there is a long history and growing evidence for disrupted vasculature and flow within the disease pathology. A broad review of the literature related to vascular effects in MS revealed a suggestive role for abnormal flow in the medullary vein system. Evidence for venous involvement in multiple sclerosis dates back to the early pathological work by Charcot and Bourneville, in the mid-nineteenth century. Pioneering work by Adams in the 1980s demonstrated vasculitis within the walls of veins and venules proximal to active MS lesions. And more recently, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been used to show manifestations of the central vein as a precursor to the development of new MS lesions, and high-resolution MRI using Ferumoxytol has been used to reveal the microvasculature that has previously only been demonstrated in cadaver brains. Both approaches may shed new light into the structural changes occurring in MS lesions. The material covered in this review shows that multiple pathophysiological events may occur sequentially, in parallel, or in a vicious circle which include: endothelial damage, venous collagenosis and fibrin deposition, loss of vessel compliance, venous hypertension, perfusion reduction followed by ischemia, medullary vein dilation and local vascular remodeling. We come to the conclusion that a potential source of MS lesions is due to locally disrupted flow which in turn leads to remodeling of the medullary veins followed by endothelial damage with the subsequent escape of glial cells, cytokines, etc. These ultimately lead to the cascade of inflammatory and demyelinating events which ensue in the course of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E. Mark Haacke
- Department of Radiology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Yulin Ge
- Department of Radiology, Center for Biomedical Imaging, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| | - Sean K. Sethi
- Department of Radiology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Sagar Buch
- Department of Radiology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Paolo Zamboni
- Vascular Diseases Center, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Sparacia G, Agnello F, Iaia A, Banco A, Galia M, Midiri M. Multiple sclerosis: prevalence of the 'central vein' sign in white matter lesions on gadolinium-enhanced susceptibility-weighted images. Neuroradiol J 2021; 34:470-475. [PMID: 33872085 DOI: 10.1177/19714009211008750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS To evaluate prospectively whether an intravenous gadolinium injection could improve the detection of the central vein sign on susceptibility-weighted imaging sequences obtained with a 1.5 T magnetic resonance scanner in patients with multiple sclerosis compared to unenhanced susceptibility-weighted images. MATERIALS AND METHODS This prospective, institution review board-approved study included 19 patients affected by multiple sclerosis (six men; 13 women; mean age 40.8 years, range 20-74 years). Patients had the relapsing-remitting clinical subtype in 95% of cases, and only one (5%) patient had the primary progressive clinical subtype of multiple sclerosis. T2-weighted images, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images, unenhanced and contrast-enhanced susceptibility-weighted images were evaluated in consensus by two neuroradiologists for the presence of the central vein sign. The readers were blinded to magnetic resonance imaging reports, clinical information, the presence and the localisation of focal hyperintense white matter lesions. Any discordance between readers was resolved through a joint review of the recorded images with an additional neuroradiologist. RESULTS A total of 317 multiple sclerosis lesions were analysed. The central vein sign had a higher prevalence detection rate on gadolinium-enhanced susceptibility-weighted images (272 of 317 lesions, 86%) compared to unenhanced susceptibility-weighted images (172 of 317 lesions, 54%). CONCLUSION Gadolinium-enhanced susceptibility-weighted imaging improves the detection rate of the central vein sign in multiple sclerosis lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Alberto Iaia
- Department of Neuroradiology, Christiana Care Health System, USA
| | - Aurelia Banco
- Department of Radiology, University of Palermo, Italy
| | - Massimo Galia
- Department of Radiology, University of Palermo, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Kaisey M, Solomon AJ, Guerrero BL, Renner B, Fan Z, Ayala N, Luu M, Diniz MA, Sati P, Sicotte NL. Preventing multiple sclerosis misdiagnosis using the "central vein sign": A real-world study. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2020; 48:102671. [PMID: 33444958 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2020.102671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2020] [Revised: 11/15/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Misdiagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) is common and often occurs due to misattribution of non-MS magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions to MS demyelination. A recently developed MRI biomarker, the central vein sign (CVS), has demonstrated high specificity for MS lesions and may thus help prevent misdiagnosis. OBJECTIVE This study explores the potential "real world" diagnostic value of CVS by comparing CVS in patients with MS and patients previously misdiagnosed with MS. METHODS Fifteen patients with MS and 15 misdiagnosed with MS were prospectively recruited to undergo 3T brain MRI. T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and T2*-weighted segmented echo-planar-imaging (T2*-EPI) were acquired. The generated FLAIR* images were analyzed by two independent raters. The percentage of lesions with CVS was calculated for each patient. RESULTS A CVS lesion threshold of 29% or higher resulted in high sensitivity (0.79) and specificity (0.88) for MS and correctly identified 87% of patients previously misdiagnosed with MS. Interrater reliability for CVS was high with a Cohen's kappa coefficient of 0.86. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates the ability of CVS to differentiate between patients with MS and patients with an MS misdiagnosis resulting from standard MRI and clinical evaluation. Clinical application of CVS may reduce MS misdiagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marwa Kaisey
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Department of Neurology, 127 S. San Vicente Blvd, Suite A6600, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
| | - Andrew J Solomon
- Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Department of Neurological Sciences, 1 South Prospect Street, Arnold, Level 2, Burlington, Vermont 05401, USA.
| | - Brooke L Guerrero
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Department of Neurology, 127 S. San Vicente Blvd, Suite A6600, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
| | - Brian Renner
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Department of Neurology, 127 S. San Vicente Blvd, Suite A6600, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
| | - Zhaoyang Fan
- Cedars-Sinai Biomedical Imaging Research Institute, 116 N Robertson Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
| | - Natalie Ayala
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Department of Neurology, 127 S. San Vicente Blvd, Suite A6600, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
| | - Michael Luu
- Cedars-Sinai Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd North Tower, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
| | - Marcio A Diniz
- Cedars-Sinai Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd North Tower, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
| | - Pascal Sati
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Department of Neurology, 127 S. San Vicente Blvd, Suite A6600, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
| | - Nancy L Sicotte
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Department of Neurology, 127 S. San Vicente Blvd, Suite A6600, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Buch S, Subramanian K, Jella PK, Chen Y, Wu Z, Shah K, Bernitsas E, Ge Y, Haacke EM. Revealing vascular abnormalities and measuring small vessel density in multiple sclerosis lesions using USPIO. Neuroimage Clin 2020; 29:102525. [PMID: 33338965 PMCID: PMC7750444 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Revised: 11/26/2020] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a progressive, inflammatory, neuro-degenerative disease of the central nervous system (CNS) characterized by a wide range of histopathological features including vascular abnormalities. In this study, an ultra-small superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) contrast agent, Ferumoxytol, was administered to induce an increase in susceptibility for both arteries and veins to help better reveal the cerebral microvasculature. The purpose of this work was to examine the presence of vascular abnormalities and vascular density in MS lesions using high-resolution susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI). METHODS Six subjects with relapsing remitting MS (RRMS, age = 47.3 ± 11.8 years with 3 females and 3 males) and fourteen age-matched healthy controls were scanned at 3 T with SWI acquired before and after the infusion of Ferumoxytol. Composite data was generated by registering the FLAIR data to the high resolution SWI data in order to highlight the vascular information in MS lesions. Both the central vein sign (CVS) and, a new measure, the multiple vessel sign (MVS) were identified, along with any vascular abnormalities, in the lesions on pre- and post-contrast SWI-FLAIR fusion data. The small vessel density within the periventricular normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) and the periventricular lesions were compared for all subjects. RESULTS Averaged across two independent raters, a total of 530 lesions were identified across all patients. The total number of lesions with vascularity on pre- and post-contrast data were 287 and 488, respectively. The lesions with abnormal vascular behavior were broken up into following categories: small lesions appearing only at the vessel boundary; dilated vessels within the lesions; and developmental venous angiomas. These vessel abnormalities observed within lesions increased from 55 on pre-contrast data to 153 on post-contrast data. Finally, across all the patients, the periventricular lesional vessel density was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than that of the periventricular NAWM. CONCLUSIONS By inducing a super-paramagnetic susceptibility in the blood using Ferumoxytol, the vascular abnormalities in the RRMS patients were revealed and small vessel densities were obtained. This approach has the potential to monitor the venous vasculature present in MS lesions, catalogue their characteristics and compare the vascular structures spatially to the presence of lesions. These enhanced vascular features may provide new insight into the pathophysiology of MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sagar Buch
- Department of Radiology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
| | | | - Pavan K Jella
- Department of Radiology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Yongsheng Chen
- Department of Neurology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Zhen Wu
- Department of Radiology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Kamran Shah
- Department of Radiology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
| | | | - Yulin Ge
- Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - E Mark Haacke
- Department of Radiology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA; Department of Neurology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Etemadifar M, Ashourizadeh H, Nouri H, Kargaran PK, Salari M, Rayani M, Aghababaee A, Abhari AP. MRI signs of CNS demyelinating diseases. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2020; 47:102665. [PMID: 33310421 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2020.102665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2020] [Revised: 11/25/2020] [Accepted: 11/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
The differential diagnosis of the central nervous system (CNS) demyelinating diseases can be greatly facilitated by visualization and appreciation of pathognomonic radiological signs, visualized on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences. Given the distinct therapeutic approaches for each of these diseases, a decisive and reliable diagnosis in patients presenting with demyelination-associated symptoms is of crucial value. Multiple sclerosis (MS) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) are major examples of such conditions, each possessing a number of MRI signs, closely associated with the disorder. This pictorial review aims to describe seventeen pathognomonic MRI signs associated with several CNS demyelinating disorders including MS, NMOSD, myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-associated disease, Baló's concentric sclerosis, metachromatic leukodystrophy, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, and neurosarcoidosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masoud Etemadifar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Helia Ashourizadeh
- Functional Neurosurgery Research Center, Shohada Tajrish Neurosurgical Center of Excellence, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hosein Nouri
- Alzahra Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran; Network of Immunity in Infection, Malignancy, and Autoimmunity (NIIMA), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Isfahan, Iran.
| | - Parisa K Kargaran
- Departments of Cardiovascular Medicine, Center for Regenerative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Mehri Salari
- Department of Neurological Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Milad Rayani
- Alzahra Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Ali Aghababaee
- Alzahra Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Amir Parsa Abhari
- Alzahra Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran; Network of Immunity in Infection, Malignancy, and Autoimmunity (NIIMA), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Isfahan, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Castellaro M, Tamanti A, Pisani AI, Pizzini FB, Crescenzo F, Calabrese M. The Use of the Central Vein Sign in the Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Diagnostics (Basel) 2020; 10:diagnostics10121025. [PMID: 33260401 PMCID: PMC7760678 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics10121025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2020] [Revised: 11/26/2020] [Accepted: 11/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The central vein sign (CVS) is a radiological feature proposed as a multiple sclerosis (MS) imaging biomarker able to accurately differentiate MS from other white matter diseases of the central nervous system. In this work, we evaluated the pooled proportion of the CVS in brain MS lesions and to estimate the diagnostic performance of CVS to perform a diagnosis of MS and propose an optimal cut-off value. Methods: A systematic search was performed on publicly available databases (PUBMED/MEDLINE and Web of Science) up to 24 August 2020. Analysis of the proportion of white matter MS lesions with a central vein was performed using bivariate random-effect models. A meta-regression analysis was performed and the impact of using particular sequences (such as 3D echo-planar imaging) and post-processing techniques (such as FLAIR*) was investigated. Pooled sensibility and specificity were estimated using bivariate models and meta-regression was performed to address heterogeneity. Inclusion and publication bias were assessed using asymmetry tests and a funnel plot. A hierarchical summary receiver operating curve (HSROC) was used to estimate the summary accuracy in diagnostic performance. The Youden index was employed to estimate the optimal cut-off value using individual patient data. Results: The pooled proportion of lesions showing a CVS in the MS population was 73%. The use of the CVS showed a remarkable diagnostic performance in MS cases, providing a pooled specificity of 92% and a sensitivity of 95%. The optimal cut-off value obtained from the individual patient data pooled together was 40% with excellent accuracy calculated by the area under the ROC (0.946). The 3D-EPI sequences showed both a higher pooled proportion compared to other sequences and explained heterogeneity in the meta-regression analysis of diagnostic performances. The 1.5 Tesla (T) scanners showed a lower (58%) proportion of MS lesions with a CVS compared to both 3T (74%) and 7T (82%). Conclusions: The meta-analysis we have performed shows that the use of the CVS in differentiating MS from other mimicking diseases is encouraged; moreover, the use of dedicated sequences such as 3D-EPI and the high MRI field is beneficial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Castellaro
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy; (A.T.); (A.I.P.); (F.C.); (M.C.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Agnese Tamanti
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy; (A.T.); (A.I.P.); (F.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Anna Isabella Pisani
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy; (A.T.); (A.I.P.); (F.C.); (M.C.)
| | | | - Francesco Crescenzo
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy; (A.T.); (A.I.P.); (F.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Massimiliano Calabrese
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy; (A.T.); (A.I.P.); (F.C.); (M.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Sinnecker T, Clarke MA, Meier D, Enzinger C, Calabrese M, De Stefano N, Pitiot A, Giorgio A, Schoonheim MM, Paul F, Pawlak MA, Schmidt R, Kappos L, Montalban X, Rovira À, Evangelou N, Wuerfel J. Evaluation of the Central Vein Sign as a Diagnostic Imaging Biomarker in Multiple Sclerosis. JAMA Neurol 2020; 76:1446-1456. [PMID: 31424490 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.2478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance The central vein sign has been proposed as a specific imaging biomarker for distinguishing between multiple sclerosis (MS) and not MS, mainly based on findings from ultrahigh-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies. The diagnostic value of the central vein sign in a multicenter setting with a variety of clinical 3 tesla (T) MRI protocols, however, remains unknown. Objective To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of various central vein sign lesion criteria for differentiating MS from non-MS conditions using 3T brain MRI with various commonly used pulse sequences. Design, Setting, and Participants This large multicenter, cross-sectional study enrolled participants (n = 648) of ongoing observational studies and patients included in neuroimaging research databases of 8 neuroimaging centers in Europe. Patient enrollment and MRI data collection were performed between January 1, 2010, and November 30, 2016. Data analysis was conducted between January 1, 2016, and April 30, 2018. Investigators were blinded to participant diagnosis by a novel blinding procedure. Main Outcomes and Measures Occurrence of central vein sign was detected on 3T T2*-weighted or susceptibility-weighted imaging. Sensitivity and specificity were assessed for these MRI sequences and for different central vein sign lesion criteria, which were defined by the proportion of lesions with central vein sign or by absolute numbers of lesions with central vein sign. Results A total of 606 participants were included in the study after exclusion of 42 participants. Among the 606 participants, 413 (68.2%) were women. Patients with clinically isolated syndrome and relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) included 235 women (66.6%) and had a median (range) age of 37 (14.7-61.4) years, a median (range) disease duration of 2 (0-33) years, and a median (range) Expanded Disability Status Scale score of 1.5 (0-6.5). Patients without MS included 178 women (70.4%) and had a median (range) age of 54 (18-83) years. A total of 4447 lesions were analyzed in a total of 487 patients: 690 lesions in 98 participants with clinically isolated syndrome, 2815 lesions in 225 participants with RRMS, 54 lesions in 13 participants with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, 54 lesions in 14 participants with systemic lupus erythematosus, 121 lesions in 29 participants with migraine or cluster headache, 240 lesions in 20 participants with diabetes, and 473 lesions in 88 participants with other types of small-vessel disease. The sensitivity was 68.1% and specificity was 82.9% for distinguishing MS from not MS using a 35% central vein sign proportion threshold. The 3 central vein sign lesion criteria had a sensitivity of 61.9% and specificity of 89.0%. Sensitivity was higher when an optimized T2*-weighted sequence was used. Conclusions and Relevance In this study, use of the central vein sign at 3T MRI yielded a high specificity and a moderate sensitivity in differentiating MS from not MS; international, multicenter studies may be needed to ascertain whether the central vein sign-based criteria can accurately detect MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Sinnecker
- Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Medical Image Analysis Center, Basel, Switzerland.,Neurocure Clinical Research Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.,qbig, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Margareta A Clarke
- School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.,Clinical Neurology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Dominik Meier
- Medical Image Analysis Center, Basel, Switzerland.,qbig, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Christian Enzinger
- Division of Neuroradiology, Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Departments of Neurology and Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Massimiliano Calabrese
- Neurology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Nicola De Stefano
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Alain Pitiot
- Laboratory of Image and Data Analysis, Ilixa Ltd, London, United Kingdom
| | - Antonio Giorgio
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Menno M Schoonheim
- Department of Anatomy and Neurosciences, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Friedemann Paul
- Neurocure Clinical Research Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.,Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health and Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Mikolaj A Pawlak
- Department of Neurology and Cerebrovascular Disorders, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
| | - Reinhold Schmidt
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Ludwig Kappos
- Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Xavier Montalban
- Section of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology (IDI), VHIR, Barcelona, Spain.,Division of Neurology, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Àlex Rovira
- Section of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology (IDI), VHIR, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Nikos Evangelou
- Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Jens Wuerfel
- Medical Image Analysis Center, Basel, Switzerland.,Neurocure Clinical Research Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.,qbig, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health and Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Maggi P, Sati P, Nair G, Cortese IC, Jacobson S, Smith BR, Nath A, Ohayon J, van Pesch V, Perrotta G, Pot C, Théaudin M, Martinelli V, Scotti R, Wu T, Du Pasquier R, Calabresi PA, Filippi M, Reich DS, Absinta M. Paramagnetic Rim Lesions are Specific to Multiple Sclerosis: An International Multicenter 3T MRI Study. Ann Neurol 2020; 88:1034-1042. [PMID: 32799417 PMCID: PMC9943711 DOI: 10.1002/ana.25877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2020] [Revised: 08/12/2020] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
In multiple sclerosis (MS), a subset of chronic active white matter lesions are identifiable on magnetic resonance imaging by their paramagnetic rims, and increasing evidence supports their association with severity of clinical disease. We studied their potential role in differential diagnosis, screening an international multicenter clinical research-based sample of 438 individuals affected by different neurological conditions (MS, other inflammatory, infectious, and non-inflammatory conditions). Paramagnetic rim lesions, rare in other neurological conditions (52% of MS vs 7% of non-MS cases), yielded high specificity (93%) in differentiating MS from non-MS. Future prospective multicenter studies should validate their role as a diagnostic biomarker. ANN NEUROL 2020;88:1034-1042.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pietro Maggi
- Department of Neurology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium;,Department of Neurology, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium;,Service of Neurology, Department of clinical neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Pascal Sati
- Division of Neuroimmunology and Neurovirology, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA;,Department of Neurology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Govind Nair
- Division of Neuroimmunology and Neurovirology, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Irene C.M. Cortese
- Division of Neuroimmunology and Neurovirology, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Steven Jacobson
- Division of Neuroimmunology and Neurovirology, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Bryan R. Smith
- Division of Neuroimmunology and Neurovirology, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Avindra Nath
- Division of Neuroimmunology and Neurovirology, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Joan Ohayon
- Division of Neuroimmunology and Neurovirology, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Vincent van Pesch
- Department of Neurology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Gaetano Perrotta
- Department of Neurology, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Caroline Pot
- Service of Neurology, Department of clinical neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Marie Théaudin
- Service of Neurology, Department of clinical neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Vittorio Martinelli
- Departments of Neurology and Neurophysiology and Neuroimaging Research Unit, Ospedale San Raffaele and Università Vita e Salute, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberta Scotti
- Department of Neuroradiology, Ospedale San Raffaele and Università Vita e Salute, Milan, Italy
| | - Tianxia Wu
- Clinical Trials Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Renaud Du Pasquier
- Service of Neurology, Department of clinical neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Massimo Filippi
- Departments of Neurology and Neurophysiology and Neuroimaging Research Unit, Ospedale San Raffaele and Università Vita e Salute, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniel S. Reich
- Division of Neuroimmunology and Neurovirology, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Martina Absinta
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Grazzini I, Calchetti B, Cuneo GL. Developmental venous anomalies in patients with multiple sclerosis: is that a coincidence or an ancillary finding? Neurol Sci 2020; 42:2453-2460. [PMID: 33083936 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-020-04840-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Developmental venous anomalies (DVAs) have been found to be more prevalent in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). The aim of the study was to compare the prevalence of DVAs in a large population of patients with MS compared with controls and to investigate the correlation of 3D Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) hyperintense signal abnormalities adjacent to DVAs between MS patients and controls having DVAs, as well as DVA potential role in differential diagnosis. METHODS Between January 2001 and December 2019, 349 patients who met the McDonald criteria for MS diagnosis (249 females, 100 males, age range 18-70 years) were retrospectively included in the study. All patients and 340 age-matched healthy controls had brain MRIs performed on a 1.5 Tesla MR system. Two radiologists reviewed all images to identify DVAs; their presence was compared between the MS and control groups. Among the subjects having DVAs, age, gender, adjacent FLAIR anomalies, and DVA location were compared between the two groups. RESULTS Fifty (14.3%) out 349 patients presented 51 DVAs (35 supratentorial and 16 infratentorial), in comparison to 21/340 (6.2%) controls (P = 0.0005). One patient showed 2 simultaneous DVAs, while 3 patients had coexisting pontine capillary telangiectasias. FLAIR white matter changes adjacent to DVAs were found in 46.2% of patients and in 28.1% of controls (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS DVAs demonstrated a higher prevalence in the MS group in comparison to controls. We confirmed the association between DVAs and FLAIR anomalies in MS patients. However, currently there are no evidences that the presence of DVAs may be used in MS differential diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Grazzini
- Department of Radiology, Section of Neuroradiology, San Donato Hospital, Arezzo, Italy.
| | - Benedetta Calchetti
- Department of Cardiology-Neurology, Section of Neurology, San Donato Hospital, Arezzo, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Kabaeva AR, Boyko AN, Kulakova OG, Favorova OO. [Radiologically isolated syndrome: prognosis and predictors of conversion to multiple sclerosis]. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova 2020; 120:7-12. [PMID: 32844624 DOI: 10.17116/jnevro20201200727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Increased sensitivity and availability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in neurological routine practice led to the fact that more and more experts began to encounter changes typical for multiple sclerosis (MS) according to MRI in the absence of anamnestic and clinical indications of damage to the central nervous system (CNS). This nosological form has been defined as a radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS). More and more RIS cases convert to MS (up to 30% in the first 5 years after RIS diagnosis). At the moment, there are no biological markers that allow combining RIS and MS into one pathological process and early treatment with disease-modifying drugs (DMT). Prospective studies are actively being conducted to identify demographic, clinical, neuroimaging and biochemical conversion predictors. The identification of the molecular biological RIS features, combining these changes with MS, is an urgent scientific task and will allow timely initiation of therapy of the pathological process already at the subclinical stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A R Kabaeva
- Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - A N Boyko
- Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia.,Federal Center of Cerebrovascular Pathology and Stroke, Moscow, Russia
| | - O G Kulakova
- Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia.,Institute of Experimental Cardiology of National Medical Research Center of Cardiology, Moscow, Russia
| | - O O Favorova
- Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia.,Institute of Experimental Cardiology of National Medical Research Center of Cardiology, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Auger C, Rovira À. New concepts about the role of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and follow-up of multiple sclerosis. RADIOLOGIA 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rxeng.2020.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
47
|
Nuevos conceptos sobre el papel de la resonancia magnética en el diagnóstico y seguimiento de la esclerosis múltiple. RADIOLOGIA 2020; 62:349-359. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rx.2020.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2020] [Revised: 06/26/2020] [Accepted: 07/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
48
|
Lv A, Zhang Z, Fu Y, Yan Y, Yang L, Zhu W. Dawson's Fingers in Cerebral Small Vessel Disease. Front Neurol 2020; 11:669. [PMID: 32849175 PMCID: PMC7396560 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2019] [Accepted: 06/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
To explore Dawson's fingers in cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) and factors related to the development of Dawson's finger, we collected and analyzed clinical data of 65 patients with CSVD. We found a venous abnormality feature called Dawson's fingers around the ventricles in magnetic resonance images (MRIs) of 20 out of 65 patients with CSVD (30. 8%). A significant association between Dawson's fingers and diabetes mellitus (DM) was also detected (30 vs. 8.9%, P < 0.05). CSVD patients with Dawson's fingers had significantly increased cerebral microbleeds (CMB) (44.2 vs. 75.0%, p < 0.05), lacunae (66.7 vs. 95.0%, p < 0.05), and white matter hyperintensity (WMH) (p < 0.05) damage, and these patients exhibited significant cognitive domain impairment as assessed via Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) (18.9 ± 1.8 vs. 24.0 ± 0.8, p < 0.05) and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) (24.5 ± 1.1 vs. 26.6 ± 0.6, p < 0.05). Our results show a distinctly high incidence of Dawson's fingers in CSVD patients and identify a significant association with DM, thus yielding insights about the appropriate use of Dawson's fingers, a venous imaging marker, to explore the basic pathophysiology of CSVD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aowei Lv
- Department of Neurology, Tianjin Neurological Institute, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Zaiqiang Zhang
- Department of Neurology, China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Ying Fu
- Central Laboratory, Department of Neurology and Institute of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yaping Yan
- Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education for Medicinal Resources and Natural Pharmaceutical Chemistry, National Engineering Laboratory for Resource Development of Endangered Crude Drugs in Northwest of China, College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China
| | - Li Yang
- Department of Neurology, Tianjin Neurological Institute, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Wenli Zhu
- Central Laboratory, Department of Neurology and Institute of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Guisset F, Lolli V, Bugli C, Perrotta G, Absil J, Dachy B, Pot C, Théaudin M, Pasi M, van Pesch V, Maggi P. The central vein sign in multiple sclerosis patients with vascular comorbidities. Mult Scler 2020; 27:1057-1065. [DOI: 10.1177/1352458520943785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background: The central vein sign (CVS) is an imaging biomarker able to differentiate multiple sclerosis (MS) from other conditions causing similar appearance lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD). However, the impact of vascular risk factors (VRFs) for CSVD on the percentage of CVS positive (CVS+) lesions in MS has never been evaluated. Objective: To investigate the association between different VRFs and the percentage of CVS+ lesions in MS. Methods: In 50 MS patients, 3T brain MRIs (including high-resolution 3-dimensional T2*-weighted images) were analyzed for the presence of the CVS and MRI markers of CSVD. A backward stepwise regression model was used to predict the combined predictive effect of VRF (i.e. age, hypertension, diabetes, obesity, ever-smoking, and hypercholesterolemia) and MRI markers of CSVD on the CVS. Results: The median frequency of CVS+ lesions was 71% (range: 35%–100%). In univariate analysis, age ( p < 0.0001), hypertension ( p < 0.001), diabetes ( p < 0.01), obesity ( p < 0.01), smoking ( p < 0.05), and the presence of enlarged-perivascular-spaces on MRI ( p < 0.005) were all associated with a lower percentage of CVS+ lesions. The stepwise regression model showed that age and arterial hypertension were both associated with the percentage of CVS+ lesions in MS (adjusted R2 = 0.46; p < 0.0001 and p = 0.01, respectively). Conclusion: The proportion of CVS+ lesions significantly decreases in older and hypertensive MS patients. Although this study was conducted in patients with an already established MS diagnosis, the diagnostic yield of the previously proposed 35% CVS proportion-based diagnostic threshold appears to be not affected. Overall these results suggest that the presence of VRF for CSVD should be taken into account during the CVS assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- François Guisset
- Department of Neurology, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium/Department of Neurology, Hôpital Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Valentina Lolli
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Céline Bugli
- Plateforme technologique de Support en Méthodologie et Calcul Statistique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Gaetano Perrotta
- Department of Neurology, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Julie Absil
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Bernard Dachy
- Department of Neurology, Hôpital Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Caroline Pot
- Department of Neurology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Marie Théaudin
- Department of Neurology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Marco Pasi
- University of Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, U1172—LilNCog—Lille Neuroscience & Cognition, Lille, France
| | - Vincent van Pesch
- Department of Neurology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Pietro Maggi
- Department of Neurology, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium/Department of Neurology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland/Department of Neurology, Cliniques universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Vattoth S, Kadam GH, Gaddikeri S. Revised McDonald Criteria, MAGNIMS Consensus and Other Relevant Guidelines for Diagnosis and Follow Up of MS: What Radiologists Need to Know? Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2020; 50:389-400. [PMID: 32665060 DOI: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2020.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2020] [Revised: 06/06/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Surjith Vattoth
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.; Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Geetanjalee H Kadam
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Santhosh Gaddikeri
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL..
| |
Collapse
|