Assessment of automatic decision-support systems for detecting active T2 lesions in multiple sclerosis patients

Artificial intelligence applied to MRI data to tackle key challenges in multiple sclerosis

Artificial intelligence (AI) is the branch of science aiming at creating algorithms able to carry out tasks that typically require human intelligence. In medicine, there has been a tremendous increase in AI applications thanks to increasingly powerful computers and the emergence of big data repositories. Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune condition affecting the central nervous system with a complex pathogenesis, a challenging diagnostic process strongly relying on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and a high and largely unexplained variability across patients. Therefore, AI applications in MS have the great potential of helping us better support the diagnosis, find markers for prognosis to eventually design more powerful randomised clinical trials and improve patient management in clinical practice and eventually understand the mechanisms of the disease. This topical review aims to summarise the recent advances in AI applied to MRI data in MS to illustrate its achievements, limitations and future directions.

A real-world clinical validation for AI-based MRI monitoring in multiple sclerosis

Modern management of MS targets No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA): no clinical relapses, no magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) disease activity and no disability worsening. While MRI is the principal tool available to neurologists for monitoring clinically silent MS disease activity and, where appropriate, escalating treatment, standard radiology reports are qualitative and may be insensitive to the development of new or enlarging lesions. Existing quantitative neuroimaging tools lack adequate clinical validation. In 397 multi-center MRI scan pairs acquired in routine practice, we demonstrate superior case-level sensitivity of a clinically integrated AI-based tool over standard radiology reports (93.3% vs 58.3%), relative to a consensus ground truth, with minimal loss of specificity. We also demonstrate equivalence of the AI-tool with a core clinical trial imaging lab for lesion activity and quantitative brain volumetric measures, including percentage brain volume loss (PBVC), an accepted biomarker of neurodegeneration in MS (mean PBVC -0.32% vs -0.36%, respectively), whereas even severe atrophy (>0.8% loss) was not appreciated in radiology reports. Finally, the AI-tool additionally embeds a clinically meaningful, experiential comparator that returns a relevant MS patient centile for lesion burden, revealing, in our cohort, inconsistencies in qualitative descriptors used in radiology reports. AI-based image quantitation enhances the accuracy of, and value-adds to, qualitative radiology reporting. Scaled deployment of these tools will open a path to precision management for patients with MS.

MRI and laboratory monitoring of disease-modifying therapy efficacy and risks

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Increasingly, therapeutic strategy in multiple sclerosis (MS) is informed by imaging and laboratory biomarkers, in addition to traditional clinical factors. Here, we review aspects of monitoring the efficacy and risks of disease-modifying therapy (DMT) with both conventional and emerging MRI and laboratory measures.

RECENT FINDINGS

The adoption of consensus-driven, stable MRI acquisition protocols and artificial intelligence-based, quantitative image analysis is heralding an era of precision monitoring of DMT efficacy. New MRI measures of compartmentalized inflammation, neuro-degeneration and repair complement traditional metrics but require validation before use in individual patients. Laboratory markers of brain cellular injury, such as neurofilament light, are robust outcomes in DMT efficacy trials; their use in clinical practice is being refined. DMT-specific laboratory monitoring for safety is critical and may include lymphocytes, immunoglobulins, autoimmunity surveillance, John Cunningham virus serology and COVID-19 vaccination seroresponse.

SUMMARY

A biomarker-enhanced monitoring strategy has immediate clinical application, with growing evidence of long-term reductions in disability accrual when both clinically symptomatic and asymptomatic inflammatory activity is fully suppressed; and amelioration of the risks associated with therapy. Emerging MRI and blood-based measures will also become important tools for monitoring agents that target the innate immune system and promote neuro-repair.