1
|
Pavković S. Enhancing post-diagnostic care in Australian memory clinics: Health professionals' insights into current practices, barriers and facilitators, and desirable support. DEMENTIA 2024; 23:109-131. [PMID: 38116661 PMCID: PMC10797845 DOI: 10.1177/14713012231213419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Providing integrated and evidence-based support to individuals and families following a diagnosis of dementia is essential in order to optimise their quality of life and assist them to live well. Memory clinics provide multidisciplinary services specialising in the assessment and post-diagnostic treatment of people with dementia. This study sought to identify current practices, barriers and facilitators to provision of postdiagnostic support and to obtain health professionals' opinion of ideal post-diagnostic support to be offered in Australian memory clinics. METHODOLOGY This was a cross-sectional qualitative exploratory study. Data was collected from health professionals familiar with the process of diagnosis and post-diagnostic support through two expert panel meetings (n = 22). In addition, 5 focus groups (n = 22) were conducted including health professionals who are employed in Australian memory clinics. Data was collected between October 2020 and November 2021. Reflexive thematic analysis was undertaken. RESULTS Seven themes and three subthemes were identified under the three topics: Current Practices, Barriers and Facilitators, and Desirable Support. Themes relating to Current Practices were: Tailored Communication and feedback about diagnosis; Prescription of medications and follow-up; and Referrals to health and community services. Themes relating to Barriers and Facilitators were: The structure of the current system; Lack of funding; Lack of resources; Call for government investment. Themes relating to Desirable support were: A key/single point of support; Cognitive interventions; and Counselling and education. CONCLUSION Post-diagnostic support in Australian memory clinics focused primarily on ensuring people understood their diagnosis, information about postdiagnostic support was provided, and dementia medications were prescribed. There were notable differences in practices in metropolitan compared to regional areas. A key concern was the need for increased funding, particularly to support the establishment of a single point of contact to facilitate continuity of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Slađana Pavković
- Wicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, University of Tasmania, College of Health and Medicine, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bannon S, Brewer J, Ahmad N, Cornelius T, Jackson J, Parker RA, Dams-O'Connor K, Dickerson BC, Ritchie C, Vranceanu AM. A Live Video Dyadic Resiliency Intervention to Prevent Chronic Emotional Distress Early After Dementia Diagnoses: Protocol for a Dyadic Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2023; 12:e45532. [PMID: 37728979 PMCID: PMC10551792 DOI: 10.2196/45532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND By 2030, approximately 75 million adults will be living with Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRDs). ADRDs produce cognitive, emotional, and behavioral changes for persons living with dementia that undermine independence and produce considerable stressors for persons living with dementia and their spousal care-partners-together called a "dyad." Clinically elevated emotional distress (ie, depression and anxiety symptoms) is common for both dyad members after ADRD diagnosis, which can become chronic and negatively impact relationship functioning, health, quality of life, and collaborative management of progressive symptoms. OBJECTIVE This study is part of a larger study that aims to develop, adapt, and establish the feasibility of Resilient Together for Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias (RT-ADRD), a novel dyadic skills-based intervention aimed at preventing chronic emotional distress. This study aims to gather comprehensive information to develop the first iteration of RT-ADRD and inform a subsequent open pilot. Here, we describe the proposed study design and procedures. METHODS All procedures will be conducted virtually (via phone and Zoom) to minimize participant burden and gather information regarding feasibility and best practices surrounding virtual procedures for older adults. We will recruit dyads (up to n=20) from Mount Sinai Hospital (MSH) clinics within 1 month of ADRD diagnosis. Dyads will be self-referred or referred by their treating neurologists and complete screening to assess emotional distress and capacity to consent to participate in the study. Consenting dyads will then participate in a 60-minute qualitative interview using an interview guide designed to assess common challenges, unmet needs, and support preferences and to gather feedback on the proposed RT-ADRD intervention content and design. Each dyad member will then have the opportunity to participate in an optional individual interview to gather additional feedback. Finally, each dyad member will complete a brief quantitative survey remotely (by phone, tablet, or computer) via a secure platform to assess feasibility of assessment and gather preliminary data to explore associations between proposed mechanisms of change and secondary outcomes. We will conduct preliminary explorations of feasibility markers, including recruitment, screening, live video interviews, quantitative data collection, and mixed methods analyses. RESULTS This study has been approved by the MSH Institutional Review Board. We anticipate that the study will be completed by late 2023. CONCLUSIONS We will use results from this study to develop the first live video telehealth dyadic resiliency intervention focused on the prevention of chronic emotional distress in couples shortly after ADRD diagnoses. Our study will allow us to gather comprehensive information from dyads on important factors to address in an early prevention-focused intervention and to explore feasibility of study procedures to inform future open pilot and pilot feasibility randomized control trial investigations of RT-ADRD. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/45532.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Bannon
- Brain Injury Research Center, Department of Rehabilitation and Human Performance, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Julie Brewer
- Center for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Nina Ahmad
- Center for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Talea Cornelius
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irvine Medical Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Jonathan Jackson
- Community Access, Recruitment, and Engagement Research Center, Division of Clinical Research, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Robert A Parker
- Biostatistics Center, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Kristen Dams-O'Connor
- Brain Injury Research Center, Departments of Rehabilitation and Human Performance and Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Bradford C Dickerson
- Frontotemporal Disorders Unit, Departments of Neurology and Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Christine Ritchie
- Mongan Institute Center for Aging and Serious Illness and the Division of Palliative Care and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Ana-Maria Vranceanu
- Center for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bannon S, Brewer J, Cornelius T, Jackson J, Parker RA, Dams-O'Connor K, Dickerson B, Ritchie C, Vranceanu AM. Focus Group Study of Medical Stakeholders to Inform the Development of Resilient Together for Dementia: Protocol for a Postdiagnosis Live Video Dyadic Resiliency Intervention. JMIR Res Protoc 2023; 12:e45533. [PMID: 37247224 PMCID: PMC10262018 DOI: 10.2196/45533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Revised: 02/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRD) are increasingly common conditions that disrupt the lives of persons living with dementia and their spousal care partners. At the time of ADRD diagnoses, many couples experience challenges that produce emotional distress and relationship strain. At present, there are no interventions to address these challenges early after diagnoses to promote positive adjustment. OBJECTIVE The study protocol described here is part of the first phase of a larger program of research that aims to develop, adapt, and establish the feasibility of Resilient Together for Dementia (RT-ADRD), a novel dyadic skills-based intervention to be delivered over live video early after diagnosis, with the goal of preventing chronic emotional distress. This study will elicit and systematically summarize perspectives of ADRD medical stakeholders to inform the procedures (eg, recruitment and screening methods, eligibility, timing of intervention, and intervention delivery) of the first iteration of RT-ADRD prior to pilot-testing. METHODS We will recruit interdisciplinary medical stakeholders (eg, neurologists, social workers, neuropsychologists, care coordinators, and speech language pathologists) from academic medical center clinics in the departments treating persons living with dementia such as neurology, psychiatry, and geriatric medicine via flyers and word-of-mouth referrals from clinic directors and members of relevant organizations (eg, dementia care collaboratives and Alzheimer disease research centers). The participants will complete electronic screening and consent procedures. Consenting individuals will then participate in a 30- to 60-minute qualitative virtual focus group, held either via telephone or Zoom, using an interview guide designed to assess provider experiences with postdiagnosis clinical care and to gather feedback on the proposed RT-ADRD protocol. The participants will also have the opportunity to participate in an optional exit interview and web-based survey to gather additional feedback. Qualitative data will be analyzed using a hybrid inductive-deductive approach and the framework method for thematic synthesis. We will conduct approximately 6 focus groups with 4-6 individuals in each group (maximum N=30 individuals; until saturation is reached). RESULTS Data collection began in November 2022 and will continue through June 2023. We anticipate that the study will be completed by late 2023. CONCLUSIONS The results from this study will inform the procedures of the first live video RT-ADRD dyadic resiliency intervention focused on the prevention of chronic emotional and relational distress in couples shortly after ADRD diagnoses. Our study will allow us to gather comprehensive information from stakeholders on ways to best deliver our early prevention-focused intervention and gain detailed feedback on study procedures prior to further testing. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/45533.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Bannon
- Center for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Julie Brewer
- Center for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Talea Cornelius
- Center for Behavioral Cardiovascular Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Jonathan Jackson
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Community Access, Recruitment, and Engagement Center, Division of Clinical Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Robert A Parker
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Biostatistics Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Kristen Dams-O'Connor
- Brain Injury Research Center, Department of Rehabilitation and Human Performance, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, United States
- Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, United States
| | - Bradford Dickerson
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Frontotemporal Disorders Unit, Departments of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Christine Ritchie
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Mongan Institute for Aging and Serious Illness, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Division of Palliative Care and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Ana-Maria Vranceanu
- Center for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Low LF, Gresham M, Phillipson L. Further development needed: models of post-diagnostic support for people with dementia. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2023; 36:104-111. [PMID: 36705009 DOI: 10.1097/yco.0000000000000848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW There is increasing recognition of a service gap immediately after diagnosis for people with dementia and carers. This narrative review of models of post-diagnostic support focuses on recent developments and offers suggestions for future development. We present the current evidence for these models and consider the service components they provide against the recommendations of clinical guidelines and principles underpinning ideal post-diagnostic support. RECENT FINDINGS Models of post-diagnostic support include a short-term support worker, ongoing support worker, centre-based support, primary care management, and specialist dementia clinics. Of these, specialist dementia clinics that include ongoing support workers provide most components of an ideal and timely post-diagnostic support framework, but may be more costly to implement universally. The greatest research evidence is for the benefits of long-term support models, specifically case management, though this does not necessarily include medical care or nonpharmacological interventions. There is sparce evidence for the benefits of short-term support worker models such as dementia advisers for people with dementia and carers. SUMMARY Further development is needed to create whole-system models of dementia support which meet the needs of people with dementia and their carers, are timely, accessible and equitable, and can be implemented universally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lee-Fay Low
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney
| | - Meredith Gresham
- Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing, Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney
| | - Lyn Phillipson
- School of Health and Society, Faculty of the Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Podgorski CA, Anderson SD, Parmar J. A Biopsychosocial-Ecological Framework for Family-Framed Dementia Care. Front Psychiatry 2021; 12:744806. [PMID: 34975562 PMCID: PMC8718405 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.744806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
The biopsychosocial model has been applied through collaborative care dementia models to the diagnosis, symptom management, and treatment of dementia with a focus specifically on the person with dementia. Because individuals with dementia are increasingly dependent upon others particularly as the illness advances, dementia care requires the involvement and commitment of others, usually family, along with support from community-based resources. Hence, the quality and effectiveness of a person's dementia care are shaped in large part by the foundation of family relationships and the social and community networks in which they are embedded. While most current dementia care models incorporate biopsychosocial principles and recognize the essential role that family members play as caregivers, they fail to consider a patient's family system and relationships as potential risk factors or social determinants for care outcomes. This paper introduces a biopsychosocial-ecological framework to dementia care that is person-centered and "family-framed" in that it targets factors that influence care considerations at both the individual and relational levels of the social ecological networks that the patient and their family members occupy. We use this model to illustrate how current dementia care practices tend to focus exclusively on the individual patient and caregiver levels but fail to identify and address important relational considerations that cut across levels. We call for the need to add assessment of family relational histories of persons with dementia and family members who care for them in order to better meet the needs of the patient and the caregiver and to prevent harm. This model accentuates the need for interprofessional education on family assessments and caregiver-centered care, as well as interdisciplinary, collaborative models of dementia care that assume more accountability for meeting the needs of family caregivers in addition to those of persons with dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carol Ann Podgorski
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - Sharon D. Anderson
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Jasneet Parmar
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Madden G, Rose T, Crystal L. Using video consultations to support family carers of people living with dementia. Nurs Older People 2021; 34:28-33. [PMID: 34431259 DOI: 10.7748/nop.2021.e1346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Established in 2019, the Lincolnshire Admiral Nurse Service supports family carers of people living with dementia through psychosocial interventions. Before the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the team provided home visits as standard, but the fact that Lincolnshire is a large rural county affected the team's ability to provide timely support to all the carers who needed it. In 2019-20, a practice development project underpinned by participatory action research was undertaken to trial the use of video consultations with carers. However, carers' uptake of video consultations was low and the project was affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. This article describes the project and discusses the findings of its evaluation. The Admiral Nurse team had mixed experiences and felt that, overall, its support was more effective when delivered face to face. The project provides insights into the challenges and benefits of video consultations for delivering psychosocial interventions to carers of people living with dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tom Rose
- St Barnabas Hospice, Lincolnshire, England
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Aldridge Z, Oliver E, Gardener H, Dening KH. Admiral Nursing-A Model of Specialist Dementia Care in Acute Hospitals. SAGE Open Nurs 2021; 6:2377960820952677. [PMID: 33415301 PMCID: PMC7774376 DOI: 10.1177/2377960820952677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2020] [Revised: 01/26/2020] [Accepted: 08/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The rising prevalence of dementia has led to increased numbers of people with
dementia being admitted to acute hospitals. This demand is set to continue
due to an increasingly older population who are likely to have higher levels
of dependency, dementia, and comorbidity. If admitted to the hospital,
people with dementia are at higher risk of poor outcomes during and
following a hospital admission. Yet, there remains a significant lack of
specialist support within acute hospitals to support people with dementia,
their families and hospital staff. Methods Admiral Nurses are specialists that work with families affected by dementia
and provide consultancy and support to health and social care colleagues to
improve the delivery of evidenced based dementia care. Historically, Admiral
Nurses have predominantly been based in community settings. In response to
the increasing fragmentation of services across the dementia trajectory, the
Admiral Nurse model is evolving and adapting to meet the complex needs of
families impacted upon by dementia inclusive of acute hospital care. Results The Admiral Nurse acute hospital model provides specialist interventions
which improve staff confidence and competence and enables positive change by
improving skills and knowledge in the provision of person-centred dementia
care. The role has the capacity to address some of the barriers to
delivering person centred dementia care in the acute hospital and contribute
to improvements across the hospital both as a result of direct interventions
or influencing the practice of others. Conclusion Improving services for people with dementia and their families requires a
whole system approach to enable care coordination and service integration,
this must include acute hospital care. The increasing numbers of people with
dementia in hospitals, and the detrimental effects of admission, make
providing equitable, consistent, safe, quality care and support to people
with dementia and their families a national priority requiring immediate
investment. The inclusion of Admiral Nursing within acute hospital services
supports service and quality improvement which positively impacts upon the
experience and outcomes for families affected by dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zena Aldridge
- Dementia UK, London, UK.,Health and Life Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wheatley A, Bamford C, Brunskill G, Harrison Dening K, Allan L, Rait G, Robinson L. Task-shifted approaches to postdiagnostic dementia support: a qualitative study exploring professional views and experiences. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e040348. [PMID: 32958494 PMCID: PMC7507844 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore the views of commissioners, service development leads, service managers and senior staff in selected dementia services on increasing the role of primary care in postdiagnostic support for people with dementia. DESIGN Qualitative semi-structured telephone interviews and a focus group. SETTING Participants were drawn from National Health Service (NHS) Clinical Commissioning Groups, social care commissioning and a range of dementia services across primary care, secondary mental healthcare, social care and the third sector. All participants were based in England or Wales. PARTICIPANTS 61 professionals, comprising 25 commissioners or service development leads; 25 service managers; and 11 team leads or senior staff. RESULTS Participants had varied views on whether a primary care-based approach for postdiagnostic support for people with dementia and their families was appropriate, achievable and/or desirable. Potential benefits of a task-shifted approach were continuity and a more holistic approach to care; familiarity for both patients and staff; and reduction of stigma. Key challenges included the capacity, ability and inclination of primary care to deliver postdiagnostic support for people with dementia and their families. We discovered a number of conceptual challenges to implementing a task-shifted and task-shared approach, including uncertainties around the nature of postdiagnostic support, the definition of primary care and identification of tasks that could be shifted to primary care. CONCLUSIONS Our data highlight the concerns of key professional staff around greater involvement of primary care in postdiagnostic support for dementia. Further research is needed to achieve a shared understanding and consensus over what postdiagnostic support means in the context of dementia. We will be undertaking such research in the next phase of our programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison Wheatley
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Claire Bamford
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Greta Brunskill
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Karen Harrison Dening
- Health & Life Sciences, School of Nursing and Midwifery, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK
- Research & Publications, Dementia UK, London, UK
| | - Louise Allan
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Greta Rait
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Louise Robinson
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|