1
|
Nakou P. Women's reproductive choice and (elective) egg freezing: is an extension of the storage limit missing a bigger issue? New Bioeth 2024; 30:11-33. [PMID: 38506261 DOI: 10.1080/20502877.2023.2300233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/21/2024]
Abstract
Egg freezing can allow women to preserve their eggs to avoid age-related infertility. The UK's recent extension of elective egg freezing storage has been welcomed as a way of enhancing the reproductive choices of young women who wish to delay having children. In this paper, I explore the issue of enhancing women's reproductive choices, questioning whether there is a more significant aspect overlooked in egg freezing. While increasing storage limits expands reproductive choices for some women, focus on this extension alone, I argue, misses a fundamental issue with egg preservation that often remains ignored; the importance of effective information on egg freezing and the effect this has on women's reproductive choices. Ultimately, I highlight the crucial role of balanced information in enhancing women's choices regarding egg freezing and argue that focusing on extending and increasing provision may obscure this real opportunity to empower women and their authentic reproductive choices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Panagiota Nakou
- Department of Law, Centre for Social Ethics and Policy, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
What test did I have? Patient uncertainty about prenatal genetic screening. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021; 225:341-342. [PMID: 34051169 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.05.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Revised: 05/16/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
3
|
Ethical, Legal and Social Issues (ELSI) Associated with Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing: Reflections on the Evolution of Prenatal Diagnosis and Procreative Choices. Genes (Basel) 2021; 12:genes12020204. [PMID: 33573312 PMCID: PMC7911180 DOI: 10.3390/genes12020204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2020] [Revised: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
New technologies such as non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), capable of analyzing cell-free fetal DNA in the maternal bloodstream, have become increasingly widespread and available, which has in turn led to ethical and policy challenges that need addressing. NIPT is not yet a diagnostic tool, but can still provide information about fetal genetic characteristics (including sex) very early in pregnancy, and there is no denying that it offers valuable opportunities for pregnant women, particularly those at high risk of having a child with severe genetic disorders or seeking an alternative to invasive prenatal testing. Nonetheless, the ethical, legal and social implications (ELSI) include multiple aspects of informed decision-making, which can entail risks for the individual right to procreative autonomy, in addition to the potential threats posed by sex-selective termination of pregnancy (in light of the information about fetal sex within the first trimester), and the stigmatization and discrimination of disabled individuals. After taking such daunting challenges into account and addressing NIPT-related medicolegal complexities, the review's authors highlight the need for an ethically and legally sustainable framework for the implementation of NIPT, which seems poised to become a diagnostic tool, as its scope is likely to broaden in the near future.
Collapse
|
4
|
Page RL, Murphey C, Aras Y, Chen LS, Loftin R. Pregnant Hispanic women's views and knowledge of prenatal genetic testing. J Genet Couns 2021; 30:838-848. [PMID: 33496987 PMCID: PMC8248231 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Revised: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Pregnant Hispanic women are underserved with their needs for genetic counseling, despite birth defects remaining the leading cause of infant death in the United States. We present the qualitative findings of a study to understand knowledge and perceptions of prenatal testing in a sample of hard‐to‐reach underrepresented Hispanic pregnant women in South Texas. The sample for this study was 10 Hispanic pregnant women who were recruited from a high‐risk prenatal clinic in South Texas in 2019. The semi‐structured interview questions were created based on the researchers' clinical experiences with this population and were designed to examine knowledge and perceptions of participants toward prenatal testing. Analysis of the qualitative data yielded several themes related to prenatal testing: (a) knowledge, (b) confusion, (c) partner's and support persons' opinions, (d) information sharing from providers, (e) psychological benefits, (f) preparation for baby, (g) obstacles, (h) religious influence, and (i) educational tools to assist with understanding. Women's understanding and knowledge of prenatal testing was limited, specifically regarding its purpose, how it works, the benefits, and why it was recommended by their provider. Lack of clarity about why they should take the test and its risks for them and their babies was perceived as something that could impede their acceptance of prenatal testing. All participants agreed that healthcare providers should share more information about prenatal testing in a way that uses ‘everyday language' so that they can understand it better. All respondents mentioned that prenatal testing provides information about their baby's health conditions, alleviates their stress and concerns, and psychologically prepares them and their family for what is to come. Identifying ways to increase culturally appropriate education delivered by genetic counselors such as through the adoption of telemedicine and mobile technology can help fill the gap for this underserved population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin L Page
- Texas A&M University College of Nursing, College Station, TX, USA
| | - Christina Murphey
- College of Nursing & Health Sciences, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, TX, USA
| | - Yahyahan Aras
- Department of Counseling and Educational Psychology, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, TX, USA
| | - Lei-Shih Chen
- Texas A&M University College of Education and Human Development, College Station, TX, USA
| | - Ryan Loftin
- Driscoll Health System, Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Corpus Christi, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shea TL. Informed Decision Making Regarding Prenatal Aneuploidy Screening. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2019; 49:41-54. [PMID: 31809696 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogn.2019.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore informed decision making for prenatal aneuploidy screening (PAS) by investigating the relationships among women's understanding of PAS, their health literacy, and their satisfaction with their decisions regarding PAS. DESIGN A descriptive, cross-sectional, correlational study. SETTING Southeastern United States. PARTICIPANTS Ninety-five adult women who were at least 18 weeks pregnant; most were White non-Hispanic (n = 75, 78.9%) and college educated (n = 56, 59.0%). METHODS Potential participants were invited to complete an online survey that was distributed via e-mail to recipients of an electronic pregnancy and parenting newsletter. The survey included questions about women's understanding of PAS, their health literacy, and their satisfaction with their decisions regarding PAS based on three validated instruments. I used descriptive statistics, bivariate correlational analysis, and multiple linear regression to analyze the data. RESULTS Higher level of education (β =.225, p = .038) and higher scores from the Health Literacy Questionnaire's scale Ability to Actively Engage With Health Care Providers (β =.317, p = .004) were significantly associated with increased understanding of PAS. Higher scores on two scales from the Health Literacy Questionnaire, Feeling Understood andSupportedby Health Care Providers (β =.329 , p = .004) and Ability to Find Good Health Information (β = .402, p = .013), were significantly associated with greater satisfaction with decisions regarding prenatal aneuploidy screening. Forty-two percent (n = 40) of participants did not report satisfaction with PAS. CONCLUSION A woman's health literacy and her ability to actively engage with health care providers are critical for informed decision making about PAS. Findings highlight the need for woman-centered strategies to promote open and intentional communication about PAS.
Collapse
|
6
|
Pop-Tudose ME, Popescu-Spineni D, Armean P, Pop IV. Attitude, knowledge and informed choice towards prenatal screening for Down Syndrome: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018; 18:439. [PMID: 30419853 PMCID: PMC6233289 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-018-2077-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2018] [Accepted: 10/30/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Down Syndrome screening test is a bridge between knowledge and uncertainty, safety and risk, unpredictability and desire to know in order to gain control. It may be accepted either not to have a baby with Down syndrome, or to prepare to have a baby with this condition. Every woman should understand that it is an option and should be encouraged to make their own decisions based on information and personal values. The implications and possible subsequent scenarios differentiate this type of test from the common biochemical tests performed during pregnancy, of paramount importance being the right to make informed choices. The aim of this study was to investigate the knowledge and attitude towards prenatal Down syndrome screening in order to asses to what extent the Romanian women make informed choices in this area. Methods A cross-sectional study was carried out that included 530 postpartum women, clients of Romania’ south-east region maternities, during April–September 2016. The level of knowledge and the attitude concerning the Down syndrome screening were evaluated using a questionnaire. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20.0. Results 48.1% of the women have never heard about any tests for Down Syndrome and from those 51.9% who have heard, only 14.2% made an informed choice, 78.9% had a positive attitude for screening, 88% were classified as having insufficient knowledge and 68.3% made a value-consistent decision to accept or decline prenatal screening. A higher knowledge level was associated with a higher education level and the urban residence. The information satisfaction and confidence in the overall value of screening were predictive factors of positive attitude. More informed choices were made by women monitored by an obstetrician in a private practice. Conclusions The prenatal screening tests for Down Syndrome were mostly unknown and the women who accepted or not to perform a test were insufficiently knowledgeable that means that the ethical concept of the informed choice wasn’t followed. In our opinion the Romanian Health System needs to improve the antenatal policy by developing an adequate information strategy at the reproductive population level based on a network of trained specialists. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-018-2077-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melania Elena Pop-Tudose
- Department of Medical Genetics, "Iuliu Haţieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Pasteur Louis Street No.6, 400349, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
| | - Dana Popescu-Spineni
- Department of Specific Disciplines, Faculty of Midwifery and Nursing, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.,"Francisc I. Rainer" Anthropology Research Centre, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Petru Armean
- Department of Specific Disciplines, Faculty of Midwifery and Nursing, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Ioan Victor Pop
- Department of Medical Genetics, "Iuliu Haţieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Pasteur Louis Street No.6, 400349, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gammon BL, Otto L, Wick M, Borowski K, Allyse M. Implementing Group Prenatal Counseling for Expanded Noninvasive Screening Options. J Genet Couns 2017; 27:894-901. [DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0178-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2016] [Accepted: 11/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
8
|
Shea TL. Prenatal paradox: an integrative review of women’s experiences with prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy and neural tube defects. Contemp Nurse 2016; 53:235-261. [DOI: 10.1080/10376178.2016.1269609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tamra L. Shea
- School of Nursing, The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, 101 McIver House, North Drive Extension, Greensboro, NC 27412, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Development and validation of a measure of informed choice for women undergoing non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy. Eur J Hum Genet 2015; 24:809-16. [PMID: 26508572 PMCID: PMC4867447 DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2015] [Revised: 08/07/2015] [Accepted: 08/14/2015] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) using cell-free DNA for aneuploidy is a highly accurate screening test; however, concerns exist around the potential for routinisation of testing. The multidimensional measure of informed choice (MMIC) is a quantitative instrument developed to assess informed choice for Down syndrome screening (DSS). We have validated a modified MMIC for NIPT and measured informed choice among women offered NIPT in a public health service. The measure was distributed to women recruited across eight maternity units in the United Kingdom who had accepted DSS. Construct validity was assessed by simultaneously conducting qualitative interviews. Five hundred and eighty-five questionnaires were completed and 45 interviews conducted after blood-draw (or equivalent for those that declined NIPT). The measure demonstrated good internal consistency and internal validity. Results indicate the vast majority of women (89%) made an informed choice; 95% were judged to have good knowledge, 88% had a positive attitude and 92% had deliberated. Of the 11% judged to have made an uninformed choice, 55% had not deliberated, 41% had insufficient knowledge, and 19% had a negative attitude. Ethnicity (OR=2.78, P=0.003) and accepting NIPT (OR=16.05, P=0.021) were found to be significant predictors of informed choice. The high rate of informed choice is likely to reflect the importance placed on the provision of pre-test counselling in this study. It will be vital to ensure that this is maintained once NIPT is offered in routine clinical practice.
Collapse
|
10
|
Vanstone M, Yacoub K, Giacomini M, Hulan D, McDonald S. Women's Experiences of Publicly Funded Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing in Ontario, Canada: Considerations for Health Technology Policy-Making. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH 2015; 25:1069-84. [PMID: 26063605 DOI: 10.1177/1049732315589745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) via fetal DNA in maternal blood has been publicly funded in Ontario, Canada, for high-risk women since 2014. We solicited women's experiences and values related to this new health technology to describe how this test is currently being used in Ontario and to provide information about patient priorities to inform future policy decisions about the use of NIPT. Guided by constructivist grounded theory methodology, we interviewed 38 women who had diverse personal experiences with NIPT. Participants' accounts of their values for decision making about NIPT heavily relied on three mutually modulating factors: timing, accuracy, and risk. The values expressed by women conflict with the way that publicly funded NIPT has typically been implemented in Ontario. We offer recommendations for how NIPT might be integrated into prenatal care pathways in a way more consistent with women's values.
Collapse
|
11
|
Allyse M, Sayres LC, Goodspeed T, Michie M, Cho MK. "Don't Want No Risk and Don't Want No Problems": Public Understandings of the Risks and Benefits of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing in the United States. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2015; 6:5-20. [PMID: 25932463 DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2014.994722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The recent availability of new non-invasive prenatal genetic tests for fetal aneuploidy has raised questions concerning whether and how these new tests will be integrated into prenatal medical care. Among the many factors to be considered are public understandings and preferences about prenatal testing mechanisms and the prospect of fetal aneuploidy. METHODS To address these issues, we conducted a nation-wide mixed-method survey of 2,960 adults in the United States to explore justifications for choices among prenatal testing mechanisms. Open responses were qualitatively coded and grouped by theme. RESULTS Respondents cited accuracy, followed by cost, as the most significant aspects of prenatal testing. Acceptance of testing was predicated on differing valuations of knowledge and on personal and religious beliefs. Trust in the medical establishment, attitudes towards risk, and beliefs about health and illness were also considered relevant. CONCLUSIONS Although a significant portion of the sample population valued the additional accuracy provided by the new non-invasive tests, they nevertheless expressed concerns over high costs. Furthermore, participants continued to express reservations about the value of prenatal genetic information per se, regardless of how it was obtained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Allyse
- Institute for Health and Aging, University of California San Francisco
| | | | | | - Marsha Michie
- Institute for Health and Aging, University of California San Francisco
| | - Mildred K Cho
- Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics and Department of Pediatrics, Stanford Medical School
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Attitudes towards non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy among US adults of reproductive age. J Perinatol 2014; 34:429-34. [PMID: 24603453 PMCID: PMC4399855 DOI: 10.1038/jp.2014.30] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2013] [Revised: 01/19/2014] [Accepted: 01/27/2014] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine how adults in the United States view non-invasive prenatal testing using cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA testing) in order to help estimate uptake. STUDY DESIGN A national sample of 1861 US-based adults was surveyed using a validated online survey instrument. The survey was administered by a commercial survey research company. Respondents were randomized to receive a survey about prenatal testing for trisomy 13 and 18 or trisomy 21. Participants were asked to select among testing modalities, including cffDNA testing, and rank the features of testing that they considered most important to decision making. RESULT There was substantive interest in the use of cffDNA testing rather than traditional screening mechanisms, with a minority of respondents reporting that they would support the use of both methods in combination. The lower rates of false-negative and false-positive test results and the ability to use the test earlier in the pregnancy were the most highly rated benefits of cffDNA testing. Participants expressed strong support for diagnostic confirmation via invasive testing after a positive result from either screening or cffDNA testing. However, almost one-third of participants reported that they would not endorse the use of either invasive or non-invasive prenatal testing. CONCLUSION There appears to be support for uptake of non-invasive prenatal tests. Clinical guidelines should therefore go forward in providing guidance on how to integrate non-invasive methods into the current standard of care. However, our findings indicate that even when accuracy, which is rated by patients as the most important aspect of prenatal testing, is significantly improved over existing screening methods and testing is offered non-invasively, the number of individuals who reported that they would decline any testing remained the same. Attention should therefore be directed at ensuring that the right of informed refusal of prenatal testing is not impacted by new, non-invasive methods.
Collapse
|