Aortic stent-grafting with transrenal fixation: use of newly designed spiral Z-stent endograft

The effect of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair on Renal Function in Patients Treated for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Aim:

The effect of endovascular aneurysm repair in patients treated for abdominal aortic aneurysm has not been clearly defined. The objective of the present article was to provide a contemporary literature review and perform an analysis to determine the effect of EVAR on renal function in the early post-operative period and during follow-up.

Methods:

A systematic review of the literature was undertaken to identify all studies reporting the effect of EVAR on renal function. Outcome data were pooled and combined overall effect sizes were calculated using fixed or random-effects models.

Results:

Thirty-two studies reporting on 24846 patients were included. Acute renal failure after EVAR occurred with an estimated frequency of 9% (95%CI: 5-16%; I2=97%). Median follow-up period was 19.5 months (range 1-60 months). The estimated frequency of chronic renal failure during follow-up was 7% (95%CI: 3-17%; I2=98%). Hemodialysis was required in 2% (1-3%; I2=97%) of the cases.

Conclusion:

High-level evidence demonstrating the effect of EVAR on the incidence of acute and chronic renal failure is lacking. Based on the current available data, nearly 10% of patients undergoing EVAR for AAA have an increased risk for renal dysfunction after the procedure. Whether this deterioration may lead to a worse outcome has not been adequately proved.

Suprarenal endograft fixation and medium-term renal function: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Suprarenal fixation is widely used in endovascular aneurysm repair. Numerous small, underpowered studies have concluded that it does not increase the risk of renal impairment compared with infrarenal fixation. A recent meta-analysis demonstrated that renal infarction is more common with suprarenal fixation, but the effect on renal function remains unclear.

METHODS

Electronic abstract databases, article reference lists, and conference proceedings were searched for series reporting renal function data after suprarenal fixation. There was considerable study heterogeneity with respect to key factors such as pre-existing renal dysfunction and length of follow-up. Authors were contacted to obtain individual patient data for a pooled reanalysis using standardized criteria.

RESULTS

Of 46 potentially relevant citations, only 11 were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Complete data sets were available for four studies (1065 patients), with a median follow-up of 33 months. Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed for postoperative renal impairment in the suprarenal fixation and infrarenal fixation groups and compared by the log-rank test. Median time free of renal impairment was 38.5 months in the infrarenal fixation group compared with 32.4 months in the suprarenal fixation group (P = .0038). However, to account for significant methodologic differences, further analysis was required using a Weibull regression model fitted in open Bayesian inference using Gibbs sampling (BUGS). The pooled hazard ratio for deterioration of renal function after suprarenal fixation was 0.6 (95% confidence interval, 0.3-10).

CONCLUSION

Currently available data are insufficient to determine the precise effect of suprarenal fixation on medium-term renal function. Conventional Kaplan-Meier analysis of the pooled data set suggested that suprarenal fixation increased the risk of renal dysfunction; however, the effect disappeared when sophisticated statistical modelling was performed to account for study heterogeneity. A randomised controlled trial of suprarenal fixation may resolve this issue.

Effect of suprarenal fixation of aortic stent-grafts on the renal artery ostia: assessment of morphological changes by virtual intravascular endoscopy

PURPOSE

To investigate the morphological effects of suprarenal fixation of aortic stent-grafts on the renal artery ostia (RaO) by analysis of suprarenal stent wire distribution and vascular calcification across the RaO using virtual intravascular endoscopy (VIE).

METHODS

Fourteen consecutive patients (11 men; mean age 75 years) from a single institution were studied following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) using the Zenith endograft system from September 1999 to March 2002. Imaging assessment included computed tomographic (CT) measurement of renal artery intraluminal ostial diameter and quantification and analysis of uncovered stent struts across the RaO and radiological determination of RaO calcification. Morphological changes following EVAR at 3 time points (before and within 1 week after stent-grafting, and at the most recent follow-up) were compared for each patient to determine whether suprarenal stent struts or RaO calcification affected intraluminal ostial diameter. Renal function was assessed by temporal measurements of serum creatinine concentration and creatinine clearance.

RESULTS

The renal ostium was distorted to variable degrees in all cases at a mean follow-up of 41+/-6.6 months. An increase in ostial diameter was identified in most patients if the right RaO was calcified when comparing the 1-week postoperative and most recent follow-up CT images (p<0.05). There was no direct relationship between the number of stent struts crossing the RaO and the morphological/dimensional changes (p>0.05). Renal function was not significantly affected.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing suprarenal fixation of aortic stent-grafts experienced morphological changes of the RaO to a variable extent at midterm follow-up. Although the presence of stent struts did not significantly affect dimensional changes, we observed that calcification at the renal artery ostium may influence the development of atherosclerotic effects as a direct relationship between the calcification and ostial diameter. Future studies utilizing VIE to determine the long-term safety of this technique in these particular patients requires investigation.

Deteriorating consumptive coagulopathy with type III endoleak following endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm associated with liver cirrhosis

PURPOSE

To report a case of deteriorating consumptive coagulopathy with type III endoleak following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of the abdominal aorta associated with liver cirrhosis.

CASE REPORT

A 72-year-old man with liver cirrhosis developed type III endoleak following EVAR. Spontaneous intramuscular hematoma developed due to deteriorating consumptive coagulopathy induced by type III endoleak and liver dysfunction. Although additional EVAR was performed at 52 months after primary EVAR, the patient died due to multiorgan failure and multifocal hematoma of the muscles and subserosa.

CONCLUSION

EVAR for patients with liver dysfunction and coagulopathy should be considered with great caution. We suggest that prompt and adequate treatment using an endovascular technique or surgical repair should be performed for patients with liver dysfunction, coagulopathy, and turbulent endoleak, even if the coagulopathies are worse compared to before EVAR.

Follow-up Results of 71 Patients Undergoing Metallic Stent Placement for the Treatment of a Malignant Obstruction of the Superior Vena Cava

PURPOSE

To retrospectively clarify the utility of metallic stent placement for the treatment of the malignant obstruction of the superior vena cava (SVC) in 71 patients with VC syndrome (SVCS) on the basis of long-term follow-up data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-one patients underwent stent placement and were followed until death. The applicability of the spiral Z-stent (S-Z-stent) mainly used the initial and follow-up results, stent placement for bilateral BCV obstruction and the value of concurrent anticancer therapy were studied.

RESULTS

The technical success rate was 100%, the initial clinical success rate was 87% (62/71), the primary clinical patency rate was 88% (57/65), and the secondary clinical patency rate was 95% (62/65). The obstruction rate of the stent was 12% (8/65), and an additional stent was useful for relief of recurrent SVCS. Survival of 57 patients in whom there was no recurrence of SVCS until death ranged from 1 week to 29 months (mean, 5.4 months and the S-Z-stent appeared to be suitable for the treatment of the malignant obstruction of SVC. Unilateral stent placement was effective for relief of SVCS with bilateral BCV obstruction. Patients who received concurrent anticancer therapy survived 2 months longer than those who did not.

CONCLUSION

Stent placement is an effective treatment for SVCS. Further, the utility of S-Z-stent for SVCS, an additional stent for recurrence, unilateral stent for patients with bilateral BCV obstruction, and anticancer therapy after stent placement were verified.

Visceral and Renal Artery Complications of Suprarenal Fixation during Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

BACKGROUND

The effect of suprarenal fixation of endovascular grafts on renal and visceral artery function remains undefined. This study aimed to determine renal and visceral artery complications following suprarenal fixation during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVR).

METHODS

Prospectively collected data from 112 patients who received suprarenal fixation (group SF) and 36 patients who received infrarenal fixation (group IF) in a single institution from December 1997 to April 2005 were reviewed retrospectively. Median follow-up was 26 months (range 0.1-101 months).

RESULTS

Stent struts extended to or above the level of 106 (94.6%) right renal arteries, 104 (92.9%) left renal arteries, 49 (43.8%) superior mesenteric arteries (SMA), and 7 (6.3%) celiac arteries in group SF. This group had 2 (1.8%) unintentional main renal artery occlusions, of which 1 was successfully treated at the first procedure with a renal stent. There was 1 (0.9%) SMA occlusion which resulted in bowel infarction and death. Group IF had no renal or visceral artery complications. There were no late-onset occlusions or infarcts. There was no significant difference in median serum creatinine between groups SF and IF at 1 month (p = 0.18) and 6 months to 12 months (p = 0.22) follow-up. The change in serum creatinine over time was also not significantly different within each group (SF, p = 0.09; IF, p = 0.38).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, suprarenal fixation was associated with a very small incidence of immediate renal and visceral artery occlusion. There did not appear to be any medium-term sequelae of suprarenal fixation.

The Mid-term Effect of Bare Metal Suprarenal Fixation on Renal Function Following Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the mid term effect of proximal bare metal fixation design on renal function in patients undergoing endovascular repair (EVR) of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA).

METHODS

Consecutive EVR patients for AAA from December 1995-2001 were included and grouped to either infrarenal (Group 1) or uncovered suprarenal (Group 2) fixation. Peri-operative renal function and at 6, 12 and 24 months was determined by serum creatinine (sCr mmol l(-1)) and Cockroft-Gault creatinine clearance (CrC ml min(-1)). Changes in renal function were compared using non-parametric analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 179 EVR procedures during this six-year period, paired renal data was available for 135 patients at a minimal follow-up of 6 months (Gp1, n = 63; Gp2, n = 72). Median pre-EVR sCr and CrC were 113, 57 in Group 1 and 108, 58 in Group 2, p = NS. There was no significant deterioration in renal function within or between either group at 2 years post-EVR: median sCr, CrC values were 118, 56 (Group 1) and 111, 56 (Group 2), all p = NS.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests mid-term renal function remains unaffected following EVR of AAA, irrespective of proximal fixation type. Designs to improve stent durability and EVR applicability do not appear to compromise renal function.

Long-term results of endovascular aneurysm repair with aortouni-iliac custom-made stent grafts

The purpose of this study was to review the outcome of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) using custom-made aortouni-iliac (AUI) devices with femorofemoral bypass. Between June 1999 and March 2001, 23 consecutive patients (1 female, 22 male) at high risk of open aortic aneurysm repair underwent EVAR with custom devices in an AUI configuration. The mean follow-up was 37 months (range 2-72 months), and the mean age was 76.8 years (range 67.5-88.7 years). Increased surgical risk was evidenced by 92% and 69% of patients with significant pulmonary or cardiac disease, respectively. The preoperative mean aneurysm diameter (n = 23) 62 +/- 8.2 mm was significantly greater than the postoperative diameter, (n = 23) 54 +/- 16.4 mm. Ten endoleaks occurred. Migration of the stent graft occurred in 9% (n = 2). Secondary interventions were necessary in 23%, whereas tertiary interventions were required in 9%. Patients at high risk of open aneurysm repair received sufficient protection from aneurysm rupture with custom-made AUI devices.

Endovascular aneurysm repair with suprarenal vs infrarenal fixation: A study of renal effects

OBJECTIVES

Although suprarenal fixation may be of benefit during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), its safety with regards to renal effects remains uncertain. To date, there has been no controlled study of the topic, with most reports relying upon single-center experiences that use heterogeneous patient populations and devices from different manufacturers. The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate the effect of suprarenal fixation on renal function by comparing homogeneous patient populations receiving EVAR grafts from a single manufacturer that are identical in design and delivery method, except for utilizing either suprarenal (SR) or infrarenal (IR) fixation.

METHODS

During two pivotal US Food and Drug Administration trials, 283 patients underwent EVAR with the Powerlink bifurcated graft. The trials' inclusion and exclusion criteria and grafts were identical except for fixation scheme. Clinical, laboratory, and computed tomographic (CT) data were retrospectively reviewed. A comparison of preoperative, perioperative (1 to 7 days), and postoperative (>7 days) alterations in serum creatinine (SCr), creatinine clearance (CrCl), and blood pressure was performed. Renal adverse events were determined by CT scan and clinical chart review and included renal infarction, renal artery stenosis (either progressive or requiring renal stent placement), and renal artery occlusion.

RESULTS

Both SR and IR groups demonstrated a significant increase in SCr and a decrease in CrCl over time. No significant difference in SCr or CrCl existed between groups during any time period. There were no differences in postoperative renal impairment (IR, 10.2%; SR, 7.6%, P = .634), the need for hemodialysis (IR, 0.7%; SR, 0%, P = 1.00), or systolic and diastolic blood pressure during subsequent follow-up between treatment groups. There was no significant difference in the number of renal adverse events detected by CT between the IR (10, 6.8%) and SR (3, 3.8%) groups (P = .550).

CONCLUSION

Suprarenal fixation does not lead to a significant increase in acute renal events, renal impairment, or alteration in blood pressure compared with infrarenal fixation. Patients undergoing aneurysm repair with devices that use either suprarenal or infrarenal fixation develop progressive renal dysfunction over time. Further studies are needed to determine the long-term effects of suprarenal fixation on renal function and progression of renal artery stenosis.

Aneurysm Diameter and Proximal Aortic Neck Diameter Influence Clinical Outcome of Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Repair: A 4-Year EUROSTAR Experience

Our objective was to evaluate the effect of preoperative aneurysm and aortic neck diameter on clinical outcome after infrarenal abdominal endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Data of patients in the European Collaborators Registry on Stent-Graft Techniques for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair (EUROSTAR) registry base who underwent EVAR with Talent stent grafts were analyzed. Patient characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared among four groups defined by preoperative abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and proximal aortic neck diameter: A, AAA < or =60 mm and neck < or =26 mm; B, AAA >60 mm and neck < or =26 mm; C, AAA < or =60 mm and neck >26 mm; and D, AAA >60 mm and neck >26 mm. Over a 7-year period, 1,317 patients underwent EVAR. Patients in groups B and D were significantly older and had a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score compared with groups A and C (p=0.002 and 0.003, respectively). Mortality rate was highest in group D (p=0.002), as were rupture and conversion rates (p=0.015 and 0.037, respectively). This study demonstrates that patients with an AAA >60 mm and a proximal aortic neck >26 mm have worse clinical outcome after EVAR.

The Management of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in Patients with Concurrent Renal Impairment

INTRODUCTION

Patients with concurrent renal impairment and abdominal aortic aneurysms present a significant challenge in terms of pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative management. This aim of this review was to determine the risks of surgery in this patient group and determine whether any clear management strategies exist to enhance their clinical management.

METHODS

Systematic review of published literature giving details of the outcome of open or endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients with pre-operative renal impairment. Papers concerning the management of post-operative acute renal failure in patients with normal pre-operative renal function has not been included.

RESULTS

There is little data regarding patients with end-stage renal failure and AAA although these patients appear to have a high peri-operative mortality rate. In contrast, those with renal impairment do not have a significantly higher mortality rate than those with normal renal function, rather they have a higher risk of complications associated with surgery and may require more intensive post-operative organ system support than normal patients. Many have a transient deterioration in renal function in the immediate peri-operative period that will resolve. In the case of patients with ruptured AAA, it is not clear whether pre-operative renal impairment affects mortality.

Six-Year Experience With Talent Stent-Graft Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

PURPOSE

To report a long-term experience with the Talent Endoprosthesis for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA).

METHODS

In the period between June 1997 and June 2003, 193 patients (171 men; mean age 71.0+/-7.8 years, range 52-89) with AAA were treated with a Talent Endoprosthesis. Patients were clinically and radiologically followed in the postoperative period, at 30 days, and then annually up to 72 months. In addition to computed tomographic scans, a plain abdominal radiogram was also performed annually for structural assessment of the stent-graft.

RESULTS

Implantation success was 99.0% (191/193). Delivery system introduction was the cause of 1 failure, and the other patient was converted to surgery for intraprocedural device migration. There were 10 (5.2%) endoleaks (3 type I, 7 type II) at 30 days; all type I and 3/7 type II endoleaks were treated (93.3% secondary clinical success). Seven (3.7%) patients died in the perioperative period, including the conversion. During follow-up, 18 (9.3%) additional deaths occurred, and 4 new endoleaks (1 type I, 2 type II, 1 type III) were encountered. In up to 6 years' follow-up, the Talent Endoprosthesis did not present signs of material fatigue, but 1 component disconnection at 42 months led to death. There was no aneurysm rupture. After an initial increase in the aortic neck (1.2+/-1.1 mm) in the postoperative period, the neck diameters continued to increase until after the third year. An average reduction of 5.6+/-4.1 mm in the aneurysm diameter at 1 year was noted; the reduction gradually reached 14.1+/-10.7 mm after 60 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The Talent Endoprosthesis was an efficient alternative for managing AAAs, achieving low morbidity and mortality rates and a good long-term clinical outcome in this study. The Talent Endoprosthesis did not present signs of material fatigue over a 6-year follow-up.

Suprarenal fixation of endograft in abdominal aortic aneurysm treatment: focus on renal function

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this work was to evaluate any variation of renal function detected by renal scintigraphy after the suprarenal fixation of endografts for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

In the few articles that have considered this problem, renal function was evaluated only by biochemical tests, which are inadequate in demonstrating small changes in renal function and in appreciating the worsening of a single kidney's function.

METHODS

Between April 1999 and May 2002, 47 patients with an inappropriate infrarenal proximal neck had a suprarenal fixation for AAA. To assess renal function, a technetium-99m diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid (TC-DTPA) perfusion scintigraphy was performed preoperatively on the third postoperative day and at 6, 12 months, and then yearly thereafter. Worsening of renal function was defined as a decrease of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) > or =20% (detected with Gates method). Serum creatinine level was tested preoperatively and at the first and third postoperative day.

RESULTS

Endograft deployment was technically successful in 44 patients (93.6%); clinical perioperative success was obtained in 46 patients (97.8%). In 12 patients (25.5%), a permanent reduction of the GFR was observed using postoperative TC-DTPA perfusion scintigraphy. By 99m TC-DTPA perfusion scintigraphy, a permanent reduction of GFR was observed postoperatively in 12 patients. A slight GFR reduction (<20%) was present in 7 (14.9%) patients, due to the planned occlusion of accessory renal arteries. A more significant GFR reduction (>20%) was present unexpectedly in 5 (10.6%) patients, in 3 of these a single kidney was involved, in 5 both with an increase of the serum creatinine level >20%.

CONCLUSIONS

Suprarenal fixation of endografts in AAA treatment is a safe procedure with good early and midterm procedural results and a risk of GFR impairment (>20%) of 10.6%.

Analysis of renal function after aneurysm repair with a device using suprarenal fixation (zenith AAA endovascular graft) in contrast to open surgical repair

PURPOSE

This study was undertaken to assess the effect on renal function of open surgery and endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair with suprarenal fixation with the Zenith device.

METHODS

Data for 279 patients with similar preoperative comorbid conditions were prospectively analyzed after AAA repair. One hundred ninety-nine patients underwent endografting with the Zenith AAA Endovascular Graft, which incorporates suprarenal fixation (Zenith standard risk group, ZSR), and 80 patients underwent open surgery (standard surgical risk group, SSR). Endovascular repair was also performed in 100 patients considered poor candidates for open repair (Zenith high risk group, ZHR). Serum creatinine concentration (SCr) and anatomic defects were assessed before the procedure, before discharge, and at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months in all patients who underwent endovascular repair, and before the procedure and at 1 and 12 months in patients who underwent open surgical repair (only SCr was measured before discharge). Renal function was also analyzed, with a creatinine clearance calculation (Cockcraft-Gault). Renal insufficiency was defined as an increase in SCr greater than 30% from a preoperative baseline value, any SCr concentration in excess of 2.0 mg/dL, or any need for dialysis. Cumulative renal infarction and arterial occlusion rates were calculated with computed tomographic, ultrasonographic, and angiographic data, and reported as cumulative values.

RESULTS

Despite the initially superior renal function in the ZSR group at the pre-discharge evaluation (P =.01), there were no differences at 12 months with respect to rise in SCr greater than 30% (ZSR, 16%, vs SSR, 12%; P =.67), SCr rise greater than 2.0 mg/dL (ZSR, 2.5%, vs SSR, 3.4%; P =.66), incidence of renal artery occlusion (ZSR, 1%, vs SSR, 1.4%; P >.99), or infarction (ZSR, 1.5%, vs SSR, 1.4%; P >.99). Only one patient in each group required hemodialysis. Of note, both groups of patients demonstrated a reduction in creatinine clearance over 12 months, which then stabilized or improved by 24 months for ZSR patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Renal dysfunction occurs in a subset of patients regardless of type of repair (open or endovascular with suprarenal fixation). The cause of renal dysfunction after open or endovascular repair with a suprarenal stent is probably multifactorial. The observed dysfunction occurs in a small number of patients, and the effect in the endovascular group (no data for the surgical group at 24 months) appears to be transient. The initial dysfunction, apparent in both groups over 12 months of follow-up, stabilizes or improves at 12 to 24 months.

Relationship of proximal fixation to postoperative renal dysfunction in patients with normal serum creatinine concentration

OBJECTIVES

This study was performed to determine whether there is deterioration in renal function during follow-up in patients who have undergone endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), as recommended by the device manufacturers; to determine whether suprarenal fixation correlates with impairment of renal function; and to explore the potential implication of life-long surveillance of renal function with contrast-enhanced computed tomography.

METHODS

One hundred forty-six consecutive patients underwent EVAR at our institution. Data from 113 of these patients who were free from preoperative renal insufficiency or postoperative renal disease were analyzed. Fifty-three patients received infrarenal (IR) fixation devices, and 60 patients received suprarenal (SR) fixation devices. All SR fixation devices were placed under investigational device exemption protocols. The average follow-up was 688 days. Sixty-five consecutive patients who had undergone open repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) served as the control group.

RESULTS

Preoperative creatinine concentration, intraoperative blood loss, contrast volume, and number of contrast-enhanced procedures were not significantly different between the IR and SR groups. Two renal artery occlusions (1 SR, 1 IR; P=NS) were identified, and 8 renal infarcts (5 SR, 3 IR; P=NS). There was an increase in mean creatinine concentration in the open AAA, IR, and SR fixation groups at each time point in the analysis. Mean elevation in creatinine concentration at 12, 24, and 36 months was 0.10, 0.10, and 0.04 mg/dL, respectively, for open AAA repair; 0.20, 0.21, and 0.28 mg/dL for IR fixation; and 0.15, 0.21, and 0.12 mg/dL for SR fixation. At life table analysis, renal impairment at 36 months was seen in 36% +/- 9% of patients in the IR group, 25% +/- % of patients in the SR group, and 19% +/- 6% of patients in the open AAA group (P=.04 for IR fixation vs open AAA repair).

CONCLUSIONS

A decrease in kidney function is seen after EVAR, regardless of fixation level, that is independent of renal disease and renal arterial occlusion. In patients with normal renal function the site of proximal fixation does not affect postoperative creatinine concentration. The decrease in renal function is likely related to the repetitive administration of contrast agent.

Mechanical properties of various z-stent designs: an endovascular stent-grafting perspective

PURPOSE

To comparatively assess the mechani-cal behavior of various clinically relevant Z-stent designs.

METHODS

A total of 16 Z-stents of original, biliary, spiral, and double-skirted designs (n=4 for each) were constructed using similar specifications for all. Stents were then evaluated for stiffness, snap opening force (SOF), flexibility, and displacement force using a novel tensiometer. Differences among the stents were determined using statistical methods. Stents explanted from dog aorta after a mean follow-up of 13 months were examined under a scanning electron microscope for surface defects.

RESULTS

Forces required for about 50% reduction in diameter were 1.88 +/- 0.16 N, 3.81 +/- 0.21 N, 2.76 +/- 0.22 N, and 3.35 +/- 0.19 N for original, biliary, spiral, and skirted designs, respectively. Differences among the four designs were statistically significant at almost all points of measurement (P < 0.0001). Biliary and skirted designs showed higher SOF values in the early measurements. Stents explanted from dog aorta after a mean duration of 13 months showed no obvious corrosion or breakage in the wire struts.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant differences exist among the various Z-stent designs in terms of their mechanical properties. Understanding them should help to select the appropriate stent for a given lesion. 316L stainless steel shows a favorable long-term tissue interaction.

Effect of suprarenal versus infrarenal aortic endograft fixation on renal function and renal artery patency: a comparative study with intermediate follow-up

PURPOSE

Suprarenal fixation of aortic endografts appears to be a safe option in patients with a short or conical proximal aortic neck. However, concern persists regarding the long-term effect on renal function when renal artery ostia are crossed by the uncovered stent. We investigated the effect of suprarenal versus infrarenal endograft fixation on renal function and renal artery patency after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.

METHODS

Records of 91 patients who underwent endovascular aortic aneurysm repair with a modular bifurcated stent graft between November 1999 and January 2002 were reviewed retrospectively. Two patients receiving dialysis because of chronic renal failure were excluded. Infrarenal fixation was used in 57 patients (group 1), and suprarenal fixation was used in 32 patients (group 2). In two patients in group 1 a Gianturco Z stent was inserted transrenally because of intraoperative proximal type I endoleak, and data for these patients were excluded from analysis. Follow-up evaluation was performed at 1, 6, and 12 months, and yearly thereafter, and included clinical assessment, measurement of serum creatinine concentration (SCr), and computed tomography angiography, per standard protocol. Median follow-up was 12 months (range, 1-36 months).

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in patient demographic data, aneurysm size, or preoperative risk factors. Median SCr was significantly higher in group 2 (suprarenal fixation) than in group 1 (infrarenal fixation) preoperatively (1.2 mg/dL [range, 0.6-2.3 mg/dL] vs 0.9 mg/dL [range, 0.6-1.9 mg/dL], P =.008) and at 1 month postoperatively (1.1 mg/dL [range, 0.8-5.6 mg/dL] vs 1.0 mg/dL [range, 0.6-2.1 mg/dL], P =.045). There was a significant increase in median SCr in both groups at 1 month postoperatively (group 1, 1.0 mg/dL [range, 0.6-2.1 mg/dL], P =.05; group 2, 1.1 mg/dL [range, 0.8-5.6 mg/dL] [mean SCr, 1.35 mg/dL vs 1.15 mg/dL, respectively], P <.05). In group 1 SCr was increased significantly at 6 and 12 months (P <.001), whereas in group 2 SCr also increased at 6 and 12 months, but not significantly. The change in SCr over time was not significantly different between the two groups. In two of 32 patients in group 2, renal artery occlusion developed, associated with perfusion defects in renal parenchyma and persistently elevated SCr. Analysis of renal artery patency did not demonstrate any association between patency and treatment. No patient developed hypertension during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Suprarenal endograft fixation does not lead to significant renal dysfunction, and renal artery occlusion is uncommon within 12 months. A larger study with longer follow-up is essential to determine overall effects on renal function and renal artery patency.

Long-term renal function following endovascular aneurysm repair with infrarenal and suprarenal aortic stent-grafts

PURPOSE

To determine in a retrospective analysis the incidence of renal impairment (RI) following endovascular repair (EVR) of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), to assess the morbidity and mortality in endograft patients with preoperative RI, and to examine the impact of suprarenal stent-grafts on renal function.

METHODS

From March 1994 to October 2001, 315 AAA patients (289 men; mean age 72.4+/-7.0 years) undergoing EVR were entered prospectively into a vascular registry. The patients received either an in-house custom-made stent-graft or one of several commercially made devices implanted with infrarenal or suprarenal fixation. Renal function was monitored by serum creatinine measurements prior to discharge and at 3, 6, and 12 months and annually thereafter. Preoperative RI was defined as a serum creatinine >130 micro mol/L and/or long-term dialysis. Postoperative RI referred to a >20% increase in the serum creatinine over baseline. Additional deterioration of renal function in patients with preoperative RI was referred to as postoperatively worsened RI.

RESULTS

Of the 315 patients treated, 220 (69.8%) were considered high risk (ruptured AAA or ASA grade III or IV). Sixty-nine (21.9%) patients had preoperative RI (6 [1.9%] on preoperative dialysis). A suprarenal stent-graft was used in 169 (53.7%) patients and infrarenal stent-graft in the remaining 146 (46.3%). The mean follow-up was 30.1+/-22.7 months. Postoperative RI occurred in 53 (16.8%) patients (24 [7.6%] transient, 29 [9.2%] persistent). Patients with preoperative RI had a significantly higher incidence of postoperatively worsened RI (37.7% versus 11.0%, p<0.0001) and a higher mortality related to RI (7.2% versus 1.6%, p=0.02). Suprarenal fixation had no influence on the incidence of RI, on perioperative mortality, or on mortality related to RI. The only significant predictive factor of postoperative RI was preoperative RI (risk ratio 5.09, 95% CI 2.38 to 10.87, p=0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular AAA repair may lead to persistent postoperative RI in nearly 10% of cases, especially in patients with preoperative RI. Suprarenal stent-graft fixation does not seem to have any deleterious effect on renal function. Further long-term studies are required to confirm the innocuous nature of transrenal stent placement.

Transrenal fixation of endovascular stent-grafts for infrarenal aortic aneurysm repair: mid-term results

PURPOSE

We evaluated mid-term results of a single-center consecutive series of endovascular stent-grafts implanted for aortic aneurysm repair with transrenal fixation, to determine clinical outcome, aneurysm anatomy, renal artery patency, and renal complications.

METHODS

Modular stent-grafts were placed with transrenal fixation in 37 patients between November 1998 and July 2000. Follow-up evaluation included clinical examination, laboratory evaluation of serum creatine concentration, computed tomographic angiography, and renal duplex scanning.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients underwent transrenal fixation of aortic stent-grafts as part of a Phase II US Food and Drug Administration study. Two patients subsequently underwent follow-up at institutions closer to their homes, and thus provided clinical information but no long-term renal or aneurysm morphologic data. There were no perioperative deaths. Five patients died during follow-up, at a mean of 9 months, because of myocardial infarction in 4 patients and respiratory failure in 1 patient. Thirty patients, ages 75 +/- 8 years, have been followed up for 28.5 +/- 7.2 months. Aneurysm diameter at follow-up was 5.0 +/- 0.8 cm, compared with 5.7 +/- 0.8 cm preoperatively. In 5 patients, endoleak developed during follow-up: 1 type I leak was treated with an aortic cuff, with temporary stabilization of the aneurysm and correction of the endoleak; 2 type II endoleaks were treated with translumbar coil embolization, and 1 resolved spontaneously; and 1 type III endoleak was treated with a combination of coil embolization and stent-graft extension to cover a graft defect. Preoperatively, serum creatinine concentration was normal in 23 patients, but increased persistently in 2 patients and was abnormal in 7 patients. Postoperatively, creatine concentration increased in 4 patients to greater than 20% of baseline level. Seventeen patients had no evidence of renal artery stenosis, compared with 13 patients with renal artery stenosis. Of 41 normal renal arteries, 90% remained unchanged, 1 became occluded, 3 demonstrated 60% stenosis. Nephrectomy was necessary in 1 patient because of cancer. Of 19 abnormal renal arteries, progression of disease was noted in 3 arteries.

CONCLUSIONS

Transrenal fixation of aortic stent-grafts can be performed with acceptable mid-term outcome with respect to mortality, need for follow-up intervention, and aneurysm exclusion with protection from rupture. Postprocedural stenosis can develop in both normal and abnormal renal arteries. Rate of progression of disease was greater in patients with preprocedural renal dysfunction compared with patients with normal renal arteries. This is merely an observation, and may not be related to transrenal fixation. Long-term follow up is needed.

The Zenith aortic stent-graft: a 5-year single-center experience

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and midterm results of the Zenith stent-graft in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA).

METHODS

Since March 1994, 364 patients have undergone endovascular repair of infrarenal AAA. Of the 94 who were treated with the Zenith stent-graft from 1996 to 2002, 88 patients (82 men; mean age 72.6 +/- 6.5 years, range 47-88) with at least 6-month follow-up were analyzed. Sixty-one (69.3%) patients were considered at high risk for intervention; 7 ruptured AAAs were treated emergently. In all, 68 (77.3%) bifurcated stent-grafts (including 18 TriFab systems) and 20 aortomonoiliac configurations were used. Cumulative data on endoleak, migration, secondary procedures, and survival were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier analyses.

RESULTS

Implantation success was 97.7%; 2 (2.3%) access-related failures were converted to open repair (1 immediate, 1 at 3 months). There were 3 (3.4%) graft limb thromboses (2 immediate, 1 late), 3 (3.4%) cases of colon ischemia due to embolization in 1 and hypogastric artery occlusion in 2, and 1 (1.1%) renal infarction due to embolism. Three (3.4%) patients died within 30 days. Eleven (12.5%) endoleaks and 1 (1.1%) late endograft migration were recorded. The 5-year cumulative endoleak and migration rates were 15% and 7%, respectively. Sixty-three (71.6%) patients did not present any complication related to the repair during a mean follow-up of 20.6 +/- 14.9 months (range 6-68); notably, no complications were associated with the 18 TriFab systems. Six (6.8%) secondary procedures were performed (31% 5-year cumulative secondary procedural rate). All 6 (6.8%) aneurysm-related deaths (the 3 perioperative, 2 from late AAA rupture, and 1 during a secondary procedure) and 14 of 18 (20.4%) non-aneurysm-related deaths occurred in high-risk patients; the 5-year cumulative survival rates were 57% for any death and 92% for aneurysm-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

The Zenith stent-graft appears both safe and effective in terms of midterm outcome of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.

Learning curve for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: evaluation of a 277-patient single-center experience

PURPOSE

To determine the minimum number of stent-graft deployments that an interventional team with endovascular skills must do to be considered well trained in endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) exclusion.

METHODS

The records of 277 consecutive patients (236 men; median age 73 years, range 49-91) undergoing endovascular AAA repair at a single institution between 1994 and 1998 were reviewed. Information was collected on procedural success, conversion, time interval between procedures, operative complications, operative mortality, contrast volume, blood loss, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), and hospital LOS. A first-order differential equation was used to calculate a learning curve based on the success rate. Patients were subsequently divided into 5 sequential groups of 55 patients (the last group had 57 patients).

RESULTS

Analyzing the pattern of procedural success to failures, a sharp change in the slope was observed between 50 and 65 trials. The number 55 was arbitrarily chosen to represent the point after which the incremental change in the success rate never exceeded 0.01 (<1 failure per 100 attempts). In the intergroup comparisons, success rate (p<0.04), conversion rate (p<0.0001), and procedural frequency (p<0.0001) were statistically significant when the first 55-patient group was compared to the others. Operative complications (p=0.08) and operative mortality (p=0.16) were numerically but not significantly different. Contrast volume was significantly reduced for the last group (p<0.0001). A Cox regression model identified only procedural frequency (p=0.03) and procedural volume (p=0.04) as predictive of technical success. Performing endovascular AAA repairs at a < or =10-day interval was associated with a >80% success rate.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that not only is the number of procedures important to outcome, but also the frequency with which they are performed. Based on our team's performance data, 55 cases would appear to be the minimum volume and 1 case every 10 days the minimum frequency to obtain good operative results with aortic endografting.