Risk of Cognitive Decline Associated With Paroxetine Use in Elderly Nursing Home Patients With Depression

Side effects based network construction and drug repositioning of ropinirole as a potential molecule for Alzheimer's disease: an in-silico, in-vitro, and in-vivo study

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the leading cause of dementia in older adults. Drug repositioning is a process of finding new therapeutic applications for existing drugs. One of the methods in drug repositioning is to use the side-effect profile of a drug to identify a new therapeutic indication. The drugs with similar side-effects may act on similar biological targets and could affect the same biochemical process. In this study, we explored the Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs using PROMISCUOUS database to find those that have adverse effects profile comparable with the ligands being studied or used to treat AD. Here, we found that the ropinirole, a dopamine receptor agonist, shared a maximum number of side-effects with the drugs proven beneficial for treating AD. Furthermore, molecular modelling demonstrated that ropinirole exhibited strong binding affinity (-9.313 kcal/mol) and best ligand efficiency (0.49) with sigma-1 receptor. Here, we observed that the quaternary amino group of ropinirole is essential for binding with sigma-1 receptor. Molecular dynamic simulation indicated that the movement of the carboxy-terminal helices (α4/α5) could play a major role in the receptor's physiological functions. The neurotoxicity induced by Aβ25-35 in SH-SY5Y cells was reduced by ropinirole at concentrations 10, 30, and 50 µM. The effect on spatial learning and memory was examined in mice with Aβ25-35 induced memory deficit using the radial arm maze. Ropinirole (10 and 20 mg/kg) significantly improved the short and long-term memories in the radial arm maze test. Our results suggest that ropinirole has the potential to be repositioned for AD treatment.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.

Identifying predictors of cognitive decline in long-term care: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Cognitive impairment can cause social, emotional, and financial burdens on individuals, caregivers, and healthcare providers. This is especially important in settings such as long-term care (LTC) homes which largely consist of vulnerable older adults. Thus, the objective of this study is to review and summarize current research examining risk factors of cognitive decline in older adults within LTC.

METHODS

This scoping review includes primary observational research studies assessing within-person change in cognition over time in LTC or equivalent settings in high resource countries. A mean participant age of ≥ 65 years was required. Searches were conducted in Medline, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and PyscInfo on June 27th, 2022 and included articles published during or after the year 2000. Title, abstract, and full-text screening was performed by two independent reviewers using Covidence. Specific predictors along with their associated relation with cognitive decline were extracted by a team of reviewers into a spreadsheet.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight studies were included in this review. The mean sample size was 14 620. Eighty-seven unique predictors were examined in relation to cognitive decline. Dementia was the most studied predictor (examined by 9 of 38 studies), and the most conclusive, with eight of those studies identifying it as a risk factor for cognitive decline. Other predictors that were identified as risk factors included arterial stiffness (identified by 2 of 2 studies), physical frailty (2 of 2 studies), sub-syndromal delirium (2 of 2 studies), and undergoing the first wave of COVID-19 lockdowns (2 of 2 studies). ADL independence was the most conclusive protective factor (3 of 4 studies), followed by social engagement (2 of 3 studies). Many remaining predictors showed no association and/or conflicting results.

CONCLUSIONS

Dementia was the most common risk factor, while ADL independence was the most common protective factor associated with cognitive decline in LTC residents. This information can be used to stratify residents by risk severity and provide better personalized care for older adults through the targeted management of cognitive decline.

Therapy Strategies for Late-life Depression: A Review

BACKGROUND

Depression in the elderly requires different treatment options because therapies that are commonly used for depression in younger patients show different effects later in life. Treatment options for late-life depression (LLD) are summarized in this article.

METHODS

A literature search in Medline/PubMed performed in June 2020 identified 83 relevant studies.

RESULTS

Pharmacotherapy with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors can be an effective first-line treatment in LLD, but >50% of elderly patients do not adequately respond. Switching to other selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors or augmenting with mood stabilizers or antipsychotics is often effective in achieving a therapeutic benefit. Severely depressed patients with a high risk of suicidal behavior can be treated with electroconvulsive therapy. Psychotherapy provides a measurable benefit alone and when combined with medication.

LIMITATIONS

LLD remains an underrepresented domain in research. Paucity of data concerning the effect of specific therapies for LLD, heterogeneity in the quality of study designs, overinterpretation of results from meta-analyses, and discrepancies between study results and guideline recommendations were often noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Treating LLD is complex, but there are several treatment options with good efficacy and tolerability. Some novel pharmaceuticals also show promise as potential antidepressants, but evidence for their efficacy and safety is still limited and based on only a few trials conducted to date.

Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing among Elderly Outpatients: Evaluation of Temporal Trends 2012-2018 in Piedmont, Italy

Pharmacological intervention is one of the cornerstones in the treatment and prevention of disease in modern healthcare. However, a large number of drugs are often prescribed and used inappropriately, especially in elderly patients. We aimed at investigating the annual prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs) among older outpatients using administrative healthcare databases of the Piedmont Region (Italy) over a seven-year period (2012–2018). We included all Piedmont outpatients aged 65 years or older with at least one drug prescription per year. Polypharmacy and the prevalence of PIPs according to the ERD list explicit tool were measured on an annual basis. A range between 976,398 (in 2012) and 1,066,389 (in 2018) elderly were evaluated. Among them, the number of subjects with at least one PIP decreased from 418,537 in 2012 to 339,764 in 2018; the prevalence significantly reduced by ~25% over the study period. The stratified analyses by age groups and sex also confirmed the downward trend and identified several differences in the most prevalent inappropriately prescribed drugs. Overall, despite a reduction in PIP prevalence, one out of three older outpatients was still exposed to inappropriateness, highlighting the extensive need for intervention to improve prescribing.

Pharmacotherapy for late-life depression

Background: Late-life depression (LLD) is one of the most common psychiatric disorders. However, LLD is often undetected or inadequately treated by clinicians. This review summarizes the recent research on pharmacotherapy for LLD, updates information on monotherapy using recommended antidepressants, and discusses the clinical features and diagnostic criteria for LLD.Current Concepts: The diagnostic criteria for depression in both elderly and young adults are identical. Clinical features of the elderly with depression more likely include more comorbid medical conditions and cognitive impairment than those of young adults. Depression in the elderly tends to have a more chronic course with frequent recurrences or relapses.Discussion and Conclusion: The current pharmacological treatment guidelines for LLD recommend the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, bupropion, mirtazapine, and vortioxetine as first-line medications. SSRIs, among them, are recommended first because they present fewer serious adverse effects and more clinical evidence than those of other antidepressants. Before starting antidepressant treatment for LLD, clinicians should consider patients’ comorbid medical conditions, drug interactions, possible adverse effects of antidepressants, and polypharmacy. The starting dose of antidepressants for elderly patients should be half of that prescribed for young adults to minimize the adverse effects; however, most elderly patients need the same antidepressant doses as that prescribed for young patients. After remission, a 1-year maintenance treatment is required to prevent recurrence or relapse of LLD.

How do cognitive and functional impairment relate to the use of anticholinergic medications in hospitalised patients aged 65 years and over?

BACKGROUND

Anticholinergic medications are commonly prescribed to older adults despite their unfavourable pharmacological profile. There are no specific systems in place to alert prescribers about the wide range of medications with anticholinergic properties and their cumulative potential.

AIMS

To examine associations between medications with anticholinergic properties and cognitive and functional impairment in hospitalised patients aged 65 years and older.

METHODS

This descriptive, cross-sectional study included 94 patients admitted to a rehabilitation ward and a geriatric evaluation and management unit. Anticholinergic burden was calculated using the Anticholinergic Risk Scale. The Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination and the Elderly Symptom Assessment Scale tools were utilised to assess cognitive function and burden of anticholinergic symptoms, respectively.

RESULTS

Medications with anticholinergic properties were taken by 72.3% of patients with level 1 being the most commonly consumed (median 1, IQR = 0-2) medications. There was no association between anticholinergic medication use and cognitive function or anticholinergic symptoms. Increasing age and the hospital length of stay were associated with fewer anticholinergic symptoms (p < 0.001 and p = 0.021, respectively), whereas the total number of medications consumed was linked to a greater burden of anticholinergic symptoms (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

A lack of association between anticholinergic medications and cognitive function could be related to duration of exposure to this group of medications and the age sensitivity. Additionally, the total number of medications consumed by patients was linked to a greater burden of anticholinergic symptoms. These findings highlight the need for improved knowledge and attentiveness when prescribing medications in general in this vulnerable population.

Estimating associations between antidepressant use and incident mild cognitive impairment in older adults with depression

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies have provided equivocal evidence of antidepressant use on subsequent cognitive impairment; this could be due to inconsistent modeling approaches. Our goals are methodological and clinical. We evaluate the impact of statistical modeling approaches on the associations between antidepressant use and risk of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) in older adults with depression.

METHODS

716 participants were enrolled. Our primary analysis employed a time-dependent Cox proportional hazards model. We also implemented two fixed-covariate proportional hazards models-one based on having ever used antidepressants during follow-up, and the other restricted to baseline use only.

RESULTS

Treating antidepressant use as a time-varying covariate, we found no significant association with incident MCI (HR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.70, 1.20). In contrast, when antidepressant use was treated as a fixed covariate, we observed a significant association between having ever used antidepressants and lower risk of MCI (HR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.28, 0.56). However, in the baseline-use only model, the association was non-significant (HR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.60, 1.17).

DISCUSSION

Our results were dependent upon statistical models and suggest that antidepressant use should be modeled as a time-varying covariate. Using a robust time-dependent analysis, antidepressant use was not significantly associated with incident MCI among cognitively normal persons with depression.

Anticholinergic burden and risk of cognitive impairment in elderly nursing home residents with depression

BACKGROUND

Although the adverse cognitive effects of anticholinergic medications in the elderly are well-documented, little is known regarding the cognitive impact of anticholinergics among nursing home residents with depression.

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the risk of mild-to-moderate cognitive impairment due to anticholinergic burden among elderly nursing home residents with depression.

METHODS

A population-based nested case-control study was conducted using Minimum Data Set (MDS)-linked Medicare data where the base cohort included patients ≥ 65 years with depression who had intact cognition (MDS Cognition score of 0 or 1) and no dementia. Cases were identified as those who had mild-to-moderate cognition (MDS Cognition score of 2-4). Each case was matched on age and sex to one control using incidence density sampling. The study evaluated cumulative anticholinergic burden (defined as score of 3 or more) within 30, 60 and 90 days preceding the event date based on the Anticholinergic Drug Scale (ADS). Conditional logistic regression model stratified on matched case-control sets was performed to evalaute cognitive impairment due to cumulative anticholinergic burden after controlling for other risk factors.

RESULTS

The study sample included 3707 cases with mild-to-moderate cognition and 3707 matched controls with intact cognition. Bivariate analysis showed significant association between cumulative anticholinergic exposure and cognitive impairment (Odds Ratio [OR], 1.15; 95% Confidence Interval [CI],1.04-1.30); after controlling for potential risk factors, cumulative anticholinergic exposure 30 days preceding the event was no longer associated with cognitive impairment, (aOR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.95-1.21). However, the odds of cognitive impairment increased with cumulative anticholinergic exposure 60 days (aOR 1.16; 1.04-1.30) and 90 days (aOR 1.28; 1.14-1.44) before the event date.

CONCLUSION

Cumulative anticholinergic use for prolonged exposure periods was associated with modestly increased risk of cognitive impairment in elderly residents with depression who had intact cognition. The findings suggest the need to be cautious when prescribing multiple anticholinergic drugs in residents, including those with intact cognition.

Advances in Pharmacotherapy of Late-Life Depression

This paper reviews recent research on late-life depression (LLD) pharmacotherapy, focusing on updated information for monotherapy and augmentation treatments. We then review new research on moderators of clinical response and how to use the information for improved efficacy.

RECENT FINDINGS

A recent review shows that sertraline, paroxetine, and duloxetine were superior to placebo for the treatment of LLD. There is concern that paroxetine could have adverse outcomes in the geriatric population due to anticholinergic properties; however, studies show no increases in mortality, dementia risk, or cognitive measures. Among newer antidepressants, vortioxetine has demonstrated efficacy in LLD, quetiapine has demonstrated efficacy especially for patients with sleep disturbances, and aripiprazole augmentation for treatment resistance in LLD was found to be safe and effective. Researchers have also been identifying moderators of LLD that can guide treatment. Researchers are learning how to associate moderators, neuroanatomical models, and antidepressant response. SSRI/SNRIs remain first-line treatment for LLD. Aripiprazole is an effective and safe augmentation for treatment resistance. Studies are identifying actionable moderators that can increase treatment response.