Nonpharmacological Management of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: An Update

A Single Center, Randomized Controlled Trial on the Efficacy of Topical Application of ReGenerating Tissue Agents (RGTA) Technology in Diabetic Foot Ulcers

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a serious complication of diabetes mellitus. Clinical data from the use of ReGenerating Tissue Agents (RGTA) technology in patients with DFUs are scarce. The objective of this randomized controlled study was to evaluate the efficacy of RGTA technology in the management of DFUs. Patients with chronic, neuroischemic diabetic foot ulcers were randomized 1:1 to the control group, that received the standard of care, and to the intervention group, that additionally received RGTA twice per week. The duration of the intervention was 12 weeks. Skin biopsies for histological and immunohistochemical analyses from a sample of participants were also performed. About 31 patients completed the study. Five (31.2%) patients in the intervention group achieved complete healing at the end of the intervention period versus 0 patients in the control group (P = .043), [RR: 0.688 (95% CI: 0.494-0.957)]. The intervention group had more ulcers with at least 80% healing of their surface [10 (66.7%) versus 2 (13.3%), P = .008, RR: 0.385 (95% CI: 0.183-0.808)], higher absolute surface reduction [1.5 (0.7, 5.2) versus 0.6 (0.3, 1.0), P = .026] and higher percentages of surface reduction [94 (67, 100) versus 40 (26, 75), P = .001] at the end of the intervention period. More patients in the intervention group achieved at least 50% healing at the fourth week of the study [9 (64.3%) versus 2 (14.3%) P = .018, RR: 0.417 (95% CI: 0.200-0.869)]. Immunohistochemical analyses were performed in a sample of participants that revealed higher expression of CD163, COL3 and VEGFR in the intervention group. The adverse effects were similar between the 2 groups. The data from the present study suggest that the adjunction of RGTA technology in the management of diabetic foot ulcers is a safe practice that promotes wound healing.

Stem Cell Therapy for Diabetic Foot: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

Objective: This umbrella review aims to summarize and evaluate the evidence from current systematic reviews/meta-analyses (SRs/MAs) on the effectiveness of stem cell therapy for diabetic foot (DF). Approach: We conducted a comprehensive search in four databases for SRs/MAs that included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on stem cell therapy for DF. Two separate researchers independently evaluated the methodological quality and evidence quality of the SRs/MAs that were included in the study. We conducted a quantitative synthesis of all RCTs included in the SRs/MAs to obtain objective and updated conclusions. Egger's test and sensitivity analysis are used to examine the reliability of the results. Results: This umbrella review includes eight SRs/MAs, and their methodological quality and evidence quality were all deemed unsatisfactory. Out of the 8 SRs/MAs, 26 RCTs were included, with a total corrected covered area of 21.4%, indicating a high degree of overlap. The test of super-significance did not yield any significant results. Our updated meta-analysis suggests that DF patients can benefit from stem cell therapy, as indicated by effectiveness in measures, including healing rate, amputation rate, ankle-brachial index, transcutaneous oxygen pressure, ulcer size reduction, complete healing time, pain-free walking distance, rest pain score, and new angiogenesis rate. Innovation: This study conducted a comprehensive evaluation and reanalysis of the current evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of stem cell therapy for DF, which is the first of its kind. Conclusion: Based on the existing evidence, stem cell therapy is effective and safe for patients with DF.

Comparative Analysis of the Efficacy of Spinal Cord Stimulation and Traditional Debridement Care in the Treatment of Ischemic Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an effective treatment for diabetic peripheral neuropathy. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of SCS in the treatment of ischemic diabetic foot ulcers.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, the SCS group comprised 102 patients with ischemic diabetic foot who were treated with SCS for foot ulcers and nonhealing wounds due to severe lower limb ischemia. The traditional debridement care (TDC) group comprised 104 patients with ischemic diabetic foot who received only TDC. Strict screening criteria were applied. The assignment of patients to either group depended solely on their willingness to be treated with SCS. Secondary end points were transcutaneous partial pressure of oxygen (PtcO2), ankle-brachial index (ABI), and color Doppler of the lower limb arteries in the feet at 6 months and 12 months after treatment. The primary end point was the amputation.

RESULTS

The dorsal foot PtcO2 and ABI of the patients in the SCS group were significantly improved at 6 months and 12 months postoperation (P < .05). The therapeutic efficacy was significantly better than that of the TDC group over the same period of time (P < .05). The degree of vasodilation of the lower limb arteries (ie, femoral, popliteal, posterior tibial, and dorsalis pedis arteries) on color Doppler was higher in the SCS group than in the TDC group (P < .05). The odds ratios for total amputation at 6 and 12 months postoperatively in the SCS group were 0.45 (95% CI, 0.19-1.08) and 0.17 (95% CI, 0.08-0.37), respectively, compared with the TDC group.

CONCLUSION

SCS improved symptoms of lower limb ischemia in ischemic diabetic feet and reduced the rate of toe amputation by increasing PtcO2, ABI, and arterial vasodilation in the lower limbs.

Early identification of delayed wound healing in complex diabetic foot ulcers treated with a dermal regeneration template: a novel clinical target and its risk factors

BACKGROUND

The dermal regeneration template (DRT), a tissue-engineered skin substitute composing a permanent dermal matrix and an upper temporary silicone layer that serves as the epidermis, has demonstrated efficacy in treating uncomplicated diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). Our institution has obtained good outcomes with DRT in patients with more complicated DFUs. Because of its chronicity, the authors are working to identify a clinical target that anticipates delayed healing early in the treatment in addition to determining the risk factors linked to this endpoint to increase prevention.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective single-center study analyzed patients with DFUs who underwent wound reconstruction using DRT between 2016 and 2021. The patients were categorized into poor or good graft-take groups based on their DRT status on the 21st day after the application. Their relationship with complete healing (CH) rate at day 180 was analyzed. Variables were collected for risk factors for poor graft take at day 21. Independent risk factors were identified after multivariable analysis. The causes of poor graft take were also reported.

RESULTS

This study examined 80 patients (38 and 42 patients in the poor and good graft-take groups, respectively). On day 180, the CH rate was 86.3% overall, but the poor graft-take group had a significantly lower CH rate (76.3 vs. 95.2%, P =0.021) than the good graft-take group. Our analysis identified four independent risk factors: transcutaneous oxygen pressure less than 30 mmHg (odds ratio, 154.14), off-loading device usage (0.03), diabetic neuropathy (6.51), and toe wound (0.20). The most frequent cause of poor graft take was infection (44.7%), followed by vascular compromise (21.1%) and hematoma (15.8%).

CONCLUSION

Our study introduces the novel concept of poor graft take at day 21 associated with delayed wound healing. Four independent risk factors were identified, which allows physicians to arrange interventions to mitigate their effects or select patients more precisely. DRT represents a viable alternative to address DFUs, even in complicated wounds. A subsequent split-thickness skin graft is not always necessary to achieve CH.

Research progress and challenges in stem cell therapy for diabetic foot: Bibliometric analysis and perspectives

BACKGROUND

Stem cell therapy has shown great potential for treating diabetic foot (DF).

AIM

To conduct a bibliometric analysis of studies on the use of stem cell therapy for DF over the past two decades, with the aim of depicting the current global research landscape, identifying the most influential research hotspots, and providing insights for future research directions.

METHODS

We searched the Web of Science Core Collection database for all relevant studies on the use of stem cell therapy in DF. Bibliometric analysis was carried out using CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and R (4.3.1) to identify the most notable studies.

RESULTS

A search was conducted to identify publications related to the use of stem cells for DF treatment. A total of 542 articles published from 2000 to 2023 were identified. The United States had published the most papers on this subject. In this field, Iran's Shahid Beheshti University Medical Sciences demonstrated the highest productivity. Furthermore, Dr. Bayat from the same university has been an outstanding researcher in this field. Stem Cell Research & Therapy is the journal with the highest number of publications in this field. The main keywords were "diabetic foot ulcers," "wound healing," and "angiogenesis."

CONCLUSION

This study systematically illustrated the advances in the use of stem cell therapy to treat DF over the past 23 years. Current research findings suggested that the hotspots in this field include stem cell dressings, exosomes, wound healing, and adipose-derived stem cells. Future research should also focus on the clinical translation of stem cell therapies for DF.

Vitamin E and Diabetic Foot Ulcers

This narrative mini-review discusses vitamin E levels in subjects with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). Vitamin E may be reduced in subjects with DFUs, but this finding is inconsistent. Its administration appears to benefit patients with DM, delaying the onset of complications, including DFUs. There is also evidence that it may promote DFUs healing. Nonetheless, further studies are required to confirm these promising results and estimate vitamin E administration's costeffectiveness.

Hospital Readmission in Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Prevalence, Causes, and Outcomes

The aim of the current study was to evaluate the rate of readmission in patients affected by diabetes and foot ulcers (DFUs), and causes and outcomes of patients requiring a new hospitalization. The current study is a retrospective observational study including patients who have required hospitalization since January 2019 to September 2022 due to a DFU. Once patients were discharged, they were regularly followed as outpatients. Within 6 months of follow-up, the rate of hospital readmission for a diabetic foot problem was recorded. According to the readmission or not, patients were divided into 2 groups, readmitted and not readmitted patients, respectively. Hence, all patients were followed for 6 months more and outcomes of the 2 groups were analyzed and compared. Overall, 310 patients were included. The mean age was 68  ±  12 years, the majority of patients reported type 2 diabetes (>90%), and the mean diabetes duration was approximately 20 years. Sixty-eight (21.9%) patients were readmitted. The main reason for hospital readmission was the presence of critical limb ischemia (CLI) in the contralateral limb (6.1%), the recurrence of CLI in the previous treated limb (4.5%), and the onset of new infected DFU in the contralateral foot (4.5%). Readmitted patients reported lower rate of healing (51.5% vs 89.2%, P < .0001) and higher rate of major amputation (10.3% vs 4.5%, P  =  .2) in comparison to not readmitted patients. Critical limb ischemia resulted in the only independent predictor of hospital readmission. Hospital readmission is a frequent issue among patients with DFUs, and readmitted patients showed a lower chance of wound healing. Critical limb ischemia resulted in the main cause of new hospitalization.

A scientometrics analysis and visualisation of diabetic foot research from 1955 to 2022

Diabetic foot (DF) has become a serious health problem in modern society, and it has been a hotspot of research for a long time. However, little scientometric analysis has been carried out on DF. In the present study, we analysed 8633 literature reports on DF in the Web of Science Core Collection from database inception until April 23, 2022. VOSviewer (Centre for Science and Technology Studies at Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands) and CiteSpace (College of Computing and Informatics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, United States) were employed to address high-impact countries and institutions, journals, references, research hotspots, and key research fields in DF research. Our analysis findings indicated that publications on DF have increased markedly since 2016 and were primarily published in the United States of America. The recent studies focus on the amniotic membrane, foot ulcers, osteomyelitis, and diabetic wound healing. The five keyword clusters, which included DF ulcer and wound healing therapies, management and guidelines, neuropathy and plantar pressure, amputation and ischemia, and DF infection and osteomyelitis, are helpful for enhancing prevention, standardising treatment, avoiding complications, and improving prognosis. These findings indicated a method for future therapies and research in DF.

The effect of high-voltage monophasic pulsed current on diabetic ulcers and their potential pathophysiologic factors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The present review was conducted to determine the efficacy of high-voltage monophasic pulsed current (HVMPC) in treating diabetic ulcers, assess its effect on skin lesions with each of the pathophysiologic factors potentially contributing to diabetic ulcers, evaluate its safety, and identify treatment parameters. Electronic search of PubMed, Scopus, PEDro and Google Scholar databases was conducted. The revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (RoB 2), the risk of bias in non-randomised studies-of interventions (ROBINS-I) and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tool were used to assess risk of bias and methodological quality. Overall quality of evidence was determined using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) principles. Thirty-two studies matched the eligibility criteria, and included 1061 patients with 1103 skin lesions of selected aetiologies; 12 randomised controlled trials were included in quantitative synthesis. HVMPC plus standard wound care (SWC) likely increased the probability of complete wound healing of pressure ulcers (PrUs) compared with sham/no stimulation plus SWC; relative risk (RR) 2.08; 95% CI: [1.42, 3.04], p = 0.0002; I²  = 0%, p = 0.61; eight studies, 358 ulcers. Although conclusive evidence regarding the effect of HVMPC on diabetic ulcers was not found, collateral evidence might suggest a potential benefit. Direct evidence, with moderate certainty, may support its efficacy in treating PrUs, albeit few adverse reactions were reported. Other observations, moreover, might indicate that this efficacy may not be limited to PrUs. Nonetheless, several aspects remain to be clarified for safe and effective application of electrical stimulation for wound healing.

Evaluation of Vitamin D Levels in Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcers

Low vitamin D levels have been associated with several diseases as its receptors are expressed in almost all tissues of the human body. Literature data have shown delayed diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) healing in patients with low vitamin D; however, data on the association between vitamin D levels and DFU in Mediterranean countries are scarce. In this cross-sectional study we examined for differences in serum vitamin D levels between patients with DFU, people with diabetes mellitus (DM) without DFU and healthy individuals in a Southern European country. A total of 96 subjects (33 patients with DFU, 35 patients without DFU and 28 healthy controls) were recruited. Medical and dietary history was obtained and total serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] levels were determined. Serum vitamin D levels differed significantly among the three groups of participants; sub-analysis showed that healthy individuals had higher vitamin D levels when compared with patients with and without DFU, while vitamin D levels did not differ between patients with and without DFU (17.9 ± 6.7 vs. 19.8 ± 8.7 ng/mL, P = 0.329, respectively). More than half of patients with DM with or without DFU had vitamin D levels <20 ng/ml. A positive correlation was found between vitamin D and sun exposure duration in participants without DFU. In conclusion, although serum vitamin D levels did not differ between people with and without DFU, the prevalence of deficiency and insufficiency was high in both groups in a Mediterranean country. This finding highlights the need for screening and supplementation with vitamin D in individuals with DM.

Mapping intellectual structure and research hotspots in the field of fibroblast-associated DFUs: a bibliometric analysis

Background

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are one of the most popular and severe complications of diabetes. The persistent non-healing of DFUs may eventually contribute to severe complications such as amputation, which presents patients with significant physical and psychological challenges. Fibroblasts are critical cells in wound healing and perform essential roles in all phases of wound healing. In diabetic foot patients, the disruption of fibroblast function exacerbates the non-healing of the wound. This study aimed to summarize the hotspots and evaluate the global research trends on fibroblast-related DFUs through bibliometric analysis.

Methods

Scientific publications on the study of fibroblast-related DFUs from January 1, 2000 to April 27, 2022 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC). Biblioshiny software was primarily performed for the visual analysis of the literature, CiteSpace software and VOSviewer software were used to validate the results.

Results

A total of 479 articles on fibroblast-related DFUs were retrieved. The most published countries, institutions, journals, and authors in this field were the USA, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Wound Repair and Regeneration, and Seung-Kyu Han. In addition, keyword co-occurrence networks, historical direct citation networks, thematic map, and the trend topics map summarize the research hotspots and trends in this field.

Conclusion

Current studies indicated that research on fibroblast-related DFUs is attracting increasing concern and have clinical implications. The cellular and molecular mechanisms of the DFU pathophysiological process, the molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets associated with DFUs angiogenesis, and the measures to promote DFUs wound healing are three worthy research hotspots in this field.

Keeping an eye on the diabetic foot: The connection between diabetic eye disease and wound healing in the lower extremity

Diabetic eye disease is strongly associated with the development of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). DFUs are a common and significant complication of diabetes mellitus (DM) that arise from a combination of micro- and macrovascular compromise. Hyperglycemia and associated metabolic dysfunction in DM lead to impaired wound healing, immune dysregulation, peripheral vascular disease, and diabetic neuropathy that predisposes the lower extremities to repetitive injury and progressive tissue damage that may ultimately necessitate amputation. Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is caused by cumulative damage to the retinal mic-rovasculature from hyperglycemia and other diabetes-associated factors. The severity of DR is closely associated with the development of DFUs and the need for lower extremity revascularization procedures and/or amputation. Like the lower extremity, the eye may also suffer end-organ damage from macrovascular compromise in the form of cranial neuropathies that impair its motility, cause optic neuropathy, or result in partial or complete blindness. Additionally, poor perfusion of the eye can cause ischemic retinopathy leading to the development of proliferative diabetic retinopathy or neovascular glaucoma, both serious, vision-threatening conditions. Finally, diabetic corneal ulcers and DFUs share many aspects of impaired wound healing resulting from neurovascular, sensory, and immunologic compromise. Notably, alterations in serum biomarkers, such as hemoglobin A1c, ceruloplasmin, creatinine, low-density lipoprotein, and high-density lipoprotein, are associated with both DR and DFUs. Monitoring these parameters can aid in prognosticating long-term outcomes and shed light on shared pathogenic mechanisms that lead to end-organ damage. The frequent co-occurrence of diabetic eye and foot problems mandate that patients affected by either condition undergo reciprocal comprehensive eye and foot evaluations in addition to optimizing diabetes management.

Screening and analysis of differentially expressed circRNAs and miRNAs in chronic diabetic extremity wounds

Increasing studies have shown that circular RNAs (circRNAs) and microRNAs (miRNAs) are related to the development of endocrine and metabolic diseases. However, there are few reports on the expression of circRNAs and miRNAs and their related co-expression and the expression of competitive endogenous RNA (ceRNA) in diabetic chronic refractory wounds. In this study, we compared the differential expression of circRNAs and miRNAs in diabetes chronic refractory wounds and normal skin tissues by high-throughput gene sequencing, and screened the differentially expressed circRNAs and miRNAs. Five abnormally expressed circRNAs and seven abnormally expressed miRNAs were detected by reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction PCR (RT-qPCR)to verify the results of RNA sequencing. We applied gene ontology (GO) to enrich and analyze dysregulated genes and elucidated their main functions via the Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes analysis (KEGG). We constructed coding noncoding gene co-expression networks and ceRNA networks based on significantly abnormally expressed genes. According to the results of coding noncoding gene co-expression network analysis, hsa_circRNA_104175, hsa_circRNA_ 001588, hsa_circRNA_104330, hsa_circRNA_ 100141, hsa_circRNA_103107, and hsa_ circRNA_102044 may be involved in the regulation of the chronic intractable wound healing process in diabetes mellitus. This is particularly true in the regulation of vascular smooth muscle contraction-related pathways and the actin cytoskeleton, which affect the healing of chronic intractable wounds in diabetes. MiR-223-5p, miR-514a-3p, miR-205-5p, and miR-203-3p, which each have a targeting relationship with the above circRNAs, regulate the metabolism of nitrogen compounds in wound tissue by regulating NOD-like receptor signaling pathways, signaling pathways regulating the pluripotency of stem cells, microRNAs in cancer, and ECM-receptor interaction. This study showed circRNAs, miRNAs, and their network are associated with the development of chronic intractable wounds in diabetes, and our research identified the goals for new molecular biomarkers and gene therapy.

Effectiveness and safety of stem cell therapy for diabetic foot: a meta-analysis update

BACKGROUND

Diabetic foot (DF) is one of the most common and serious complications of diabetes mellitus (DM), which brings great psychological and economic pressure to patients. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of stem cells in the treatment of diabetic foot.

METHODS

All relevant studies in Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and WanFang databases were systematically searched for meta-analysis. The outcomes consisted of ulcer or wound healing rate, amputation rate, new vessels, ankle-brachial index (ABI), transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO2), pain-free walking distance, and rest pain score. Dichotomous outcomes were described as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), while continuous data were presented as standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% CIs. Statistical analysis was performed with RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS

A total of 14 studies with 683 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis showed that stem cell therapy was more effective than conventional therapy in terms of ulcer or wound healing rate [OR = 8.20 (5.33, 12.62)], improvement in lower extremity ischemia(new vessels) [OR = 16.48 (2.88, 94.18)], ABI [MD = 0.13 (0.04, 0.08)], TcO2[MD = 4.23 (1.82, 6.65)], pain-free walking distance [MD = 220.79 (82.10, 359.48)], and rest pain score [MD = - 1.94 (- 2.50, - 1.39)], while the amputation rate was significantly decreased [OR = 0.19 (0.10, 0.36)].

CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analysis of the current studies has shown that stem cells are significantly more effective than traditional methods in the treatment of diabetic foot and can improve the quality of life of patients after treatment. Future studies should conduct large-scale, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trials with high-quality long-term follow-up to demonstrate the most effective cell types and therapeutic parameters for the treatment of diabetic foot.