Tooth loss occurring at a place other than a health-care facility: 72-month incidence

Predictors of change in satisfaction with chewing ability: a 24-month study of dentate adults

People's satisfaction with chewing ability is not determined entirely by their mechanical chewing function. Instead, it is a complex measure that embraces broad physical, social and psychological components. Using data from the Florida Dental Care Study, a prospective longitudinal study of oral health and dental care, this current study aimed to identify the longitudinal relationships between changes in satisfaction with chewing ability and changes in other dimensions of oral health and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). A multidimensional conceptual model of oral health and OHRQoL was applied to guide the analysis. Most dentate people were satisfied with their chewing ability. However, changes in satisfaction with chewing ability were common: nearly 11-22% of subjects experienced improved satisfaction, depending on the interval; while about 12-18% of subjects experienced deteriorated satisfaction by the end of the interval. Changes in satisfaction with chewing ability were significantly associated with changes in other aspects of oral health and OHRQoL. Onset of certain oral health problems/conditions or constantly having such problems was associated with a lower probability of reporting improvement in satisfaction and a higher probability of experiencing deterioration. In contrast, recovery from certain oral health problems/conditions or not having such problems was associated with a higher probability of improvement and a lower probability of deterioration.

Racial differences in treatment preferences: oral health as an example

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

Recent analyses from the Florida Dental Care Study found that response to a hypothetical scenario at baseline strongly predicted: (a) tooth loss during follow-up; and (b) subsequent receipt of either a dental extraction or Root Canal Therapy (RCT). The scenario ('CHOICE') required choosing either to: (1) extract the tooth before even knowing the cost of treatments; (2) extract, but after knowing the cost of all treatments; or (3) have RCT despite knowing costs.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with CHOICE and quantify their effects.

METHODS

As part of the baseline phase of the study, 873 subjects with at least one tooth and who were 45 years or older participated for an interview and dental examination. A multinomial multivariable regression of CHOICE quantified effects due to hypothesized predictors.

RESULTS

CHOICE was strongly associated with race (African-Americans were significantly less likely to choose RCT). Results from the multivariable regression suggest that the race effect could be explained by racial differences in patient preference, treatment acceptability and ability to afford treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

There were substantial racial differences in treatment preference even in this hypothetical scenario where racial differences in patient-provider interaction and clinical factors were not relevant. Certain predisposing and enabling variables explained these racial differences in treatment preference.

Forty-Eight–Month Periodontal Attachment Loss Incidence in a Population-Based Cohort Study: Role of Baseline Status, Incident Tooth Loss, and Specific Behavioral Factors

BACKGROUND

The objectives of this study were to: 1) test hypotheses that behavioral factors, baseline clinical status, and incident tooth loss are significantly associated with attachment loss incidence (ALI) and 2) quantify the effect of incident tooth loss on conclusions made about ALI.

METHODS

The Florida Dental Care Study was a prospective study of persons > or =45 years old. In-person interviews and examinations were conducted at baseline and 48 months, with telephone interviews in between.

RESULTS

Of 560 persons with baseline and 48-month examinations, 22% of persons and 1.8% of teeth had ALI. This was highest among persons with no dental visit during follow-up (person-level incidence of 46%; 5.0% tooth-level incidence). Statistically significant covariates in a multivariable regression of ALI were: losing a tooth due to periodontal reasons after baseline, but before the 48-month examination; not receiving a dental cleaning; and baseline factors (worst attachment level of > or =7 mm, not flossing, a molar tooth, current smoker).

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial percentage of persons experienced ALI. Baseline attachment level and behavioral factors were significantly associated with ALI. Persons with incident tooth loss were also at increased risk for ALI, and teeth lost during follow-up had worse baseline attachment level. Had these teeth not been lost before the final examination, the ALI estimate could only have been higher. These findings demonstrate that those at greatest risk for ALI are least likely to enter the dental care system, and among those who do, one health outcome (tooth loss) can affect conclusions made about the incidence of another (ALI).

Root Canal Treatment in a Population-Based Adult Sample: Status of Teeth After Endodontic Treatment

The purpose of this study was to quantify treatment outcomes of endodontically treated teeth, in a representative, population-based adult sample. The "Florida Dental Care Study" was a prospective, longitudinal, cohort study of 873 subjects who had at least one tooth at baseline and who were 45 yr or older. An in-person interview and clinical examination were conducted at baseline, 24 months, and 48 months after baseline, with 6-monthly telephone interviews between those times. Dental record information was abstracted afterward. Seventy-five teeth had conventional root-canal therapy (RCT) performed and met the inclusion criteria of 1-yr of follow-up or extraction. The mean duration of follow-up after RCT was 24.8 months. The mean (SD) attachment loss (AL) on teeth receiving RCT was only 3.3 (1.4) mm. Permanent restorations were placed in 79% of teeth a mean of 4.4 months after the RCT. However, 12% of teeth did not have any restorative treatment after RCT. After RCT had been completed, 81% of teeth were retained and 19% were ultimately extracted. Taken as a whole, this community-based study of a representative sample of adults suggests a higher failure rate than reported from studies in highly controlled environments or insured populations. It also suggests that the length of time to initial restoration of RCT-treated teeth is less than optimal. RCT was almost never performed on teeth with advanced periodontal attachment loss.