Aortic Arch Repair Using Open and Hybrid Techniques: A Systematic Review

The Call for the "Interventional/Hybrid" Aortic Surgeon: Open, Endovascular, and Hybrid Therapies of the Aortic Arch

Aortic arch pathology is relatively rare but potentially highly fatal and associated with considerable comorbidity. Operative mortality and complication rates have improved over time but remain high. In response, aortic arch surgery is one of the most rapidly evolving areas of cardiac surgery in terms of surgical volume and improved outcomes. Moreover, there has been a surge in novel devices and techniques, many of which have been developed by or codeveloped with vascular surgeons and interventional radiologists. Nevertheless, the extent of arch surgery, the choice of nadir temperature, cannulation, and perfusion strategies, and the use of open, endovascular, or hybrid options vary according to country, centre, and surgeon. In this review article, we provide a technical overview of the surgical, total endovascular, and hybrid repair options for aortic arch pathology through historical developments and contemporary results. We highlight key information for surgeons, cardiologists, and trainees to understand the management of patients with aortic arch pathology. We conclude by discussing training paradigms, the role of aortic teams, and gaps in knowledge, arguing for the need for wire skills for the future "interventional aortic surgeon" and increased research into techniques and novel devices to continue improving outcomes for aortic arch surgery.

Can a 'branch-first' approach to aortic arch replacement be safely utilized in Stanford type A acute aortic syndromes?

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was: 'Can a "branch-first" approach to aortic arch replacement be safely utilized in Stanford type A acute aortic syndromes?' Altogether 64 papers were found using the reported searches, of which 10represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. All papers included in this BET reported acceptable mortality and/or neurological outcomes in comparison to currently published standards for traditional repair. We conclude that while there is a need for larger series, direct comparison and long-term follow-up, the 'branch-first' approach to aortic arch replacement has been safely performed in several centres in the setting of acute aortic syndromes with results demonstrating acceptable mortality, neurological outcomes and mid-term survival.