Use of a radial artery 'slender' sheath for facilitating transfemoral arterial access for neuroendovascular embolization in a very young infant

Evolving indications for pediatric neurointerventional radiology: A single institutional 25-year experience in infants less than one year of age and a brief historical review

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Pediatric neurointerventional radiology is an evolving subspecialty with growing indications and technological advancement such as miniaturization of devices and decreased radiation dose. The ability to perform these procedures is continuously balanced with necessity given the inherently higher risks of radiation and cerebrovascular injury in infants. The purpose of this study is to review our institution's neurointerventional experience in infants less than one year of age to elucidate trends in this patient population.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 132 patients from a neurointerventional database spanning 25 years (1997-2022) who underwent 226 procedures. Treatment type, indication, and location as well as patient demographics were extracted from the medical record.

RESULTS

Neurointerventional procedures were performed as early as day of life 0 in a patient with an arteriovenous shunting malformation. Average age of intervention in the first year of life is 5.9 months. Thirty-eight of 226 procedures were completed in neonates. Intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) for the treatment of retinoblastoma comprised 36% of neurointerventional procedures completed in infants less than one year of age followed by low flow vascular malformations (21.2%), vein of Galen malformations (11.5%), and dural arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) (9.3%). Less frequent indications include non-Galenic pial AVF (4.4%) and tumor embolization (3.0%). The total number of interventions has increased secondary to the onset of retinoblastoma treatment in 2010 at our institution.

CONCLUSION

The introduction of IAC for the treatment of retinoblastoma in the last decade is the primary driver for the increased trend in neurointerventional procedures completed in infants from 1997 to 2022.

Low profile sheaths in pediatric neurointervention: a multicenter experience

BACKGROUND

Pediatric neurointervention is challenged by the appropriateness of adult catheters and devices. This multicenter report on the smallest groin access sheaths offers technical notes and clinical outcomes in the pediatric neurointerventional population.

METHODS

All pediatric neurointerventional cases from 2019 to 2021 were reviewed for use of a 3.3F Pediavascular or a 4F Merit Prelude Ideal low profile sheath. Hospital records were reviewed for complications and technical notes and compared with arterial groin access with the 4F Terumo Pinnacle in infants less than 1 year old, before the low profile sheaths at one author's institution were introduced.

RESULTS

From January 1, 2019 to March 31, 2021 there were 347 procedures performed at Boston Children's Hospital and University of Wisconsin. Forty-four procedures in 26 patients were identified in which a 3.3F (38 cases, 20 patients) or 4F (6 cases, 6 patients) sheath was used. The average age was 2.2 years (1.5 days to 18 years). Retinoblastoma intra-arterial chemotherapy infusion (18 of 44) was the most common indication. The remaining procedures comprised vein of Galen embolization (12), diagnostic cerebral angiography (13), and one preoperative tumor embolization. Morbidity included a groin hematoma and decreased pulses (4.5%). No major groin complications occurred. There was no statistically significant difference compared with the historical cohort (132 procedures), which had seven instances of decreased pulses (5.3%, p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

The 3.3F Pediavascular and 4F Merit Prelude Ideal sheaths are easily incorporated into the pediatric neurointerventionalist's armamentarium for infants and readily accommodate various microcatheters for distal embolization and catheterization.

Use of radial access sheaths for transfemoral neuroendovascular procedures in children

PURPOSE

Pediatric neuroendovascular procedures require special considerations. Given small vessel sizes, risk for arterial injury must be weighed against use of larger devices, with the diameter of the sheath being a known association with arterial complications. We recently transitioned to using thin-walled radial sheaths for transfemoral angiography in children, given their lower profile. Here, we report on these sheaths' technical success and complications, comparing against a historical cohort where regular vascular sheaths were employed.

METHODS

We retrospectively recorded patient and procedural data from 168 consecutive procedures from September 2017 to January 2019 when radial-specific sheaths were exclusively used at our tertiary pediatric hospital. These results were compared to data from September 2015 to January 2017, when regular vascular sheaths were exclusively used in 152 consecutive procedures. Statistical analysis was performed using unpaired t test or chi-square test, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics (age, sex, weight) were not statistically different between the case and control group. No significant differences were found in the procedural data with the exception of heparin use which was higher in the radial-sheath cohort. There was a decrease in the rate of complications in the case group (1.2%) versus control group (2.6%), though not statistically different.

CONCLUSION

Radial-specific sheaths have numerous beneficial characteristics that make them well-suited to the pediatric population. In our study, we show that radial sheaths are equally effective and safe perioperatively. Follow-up research may show if radial sheaths used transfemorally decrease long-term complications such as limb-length discrepancy and mortality.