Usefulness and performance evaluation of serum KL-6 and SP-A assays in healthy individuals and patients with interstitial lung disease

BACKGROUND

Interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) are associated with the risk of progression to interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). Krebs von den Lungen 6 (KL-6) and surfactant protein (SP)-A have been used as biomarkers of ILDs. In this study, we evaluated the levels of these biomarkers and identified their clinical correlations in healthy individuals to assess their usefulness in the diagnosis of ILAs.

METHODS

The patient samples were categorized into three groups: healthy, disease, and ILD groups. We used the automated immunoassay HISCL KL-6 and SP-A assay kits. The analytical performance evaluation involved precision, linearity, comparison, establishment of reference intervals, and determination of the cutoff points. We also analyzed the correlations between presence of abnormalities on chest radiography and computed tomography (CT) or pulmonary function test (PFT) and serum levels in the healthy group.

RESULTS

KL-6 and SP-A assays showed good analytical performance. The KL-6 and SP-A cutoff values were 304 U/mL and 43.5 ng/mL between the ILD and healthy groups, respectively, which were lower than the values recommended by the manufacturer. In the clinical correlations with radiological findings, SP-A values in subjects with lung abnormalities on CT scans were significantly higher than those in normal scans. There was no significant difference in KL-6 and SP-A levels among PFT patterns; however, both serum levels in the mixed pattern showed higher values than those in the other patterns.

CONCLUSIONS

The results revealed a positive association between increased serum levels of SP-A and KL-6 and clinical characteristics as incidental findings on chest imaging and reduced lung function.

Combined Longitudinal Clinical and Autopsy Phenomic Assessment in Lethal Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Recommendations for Advancing Precision Medicine

BACKGROUND

Systematic identification of data essential for outcome prediction in metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) would accelerate development of precision oncology.

OBJECTIVE

To identify novel phenotypes and features associated with mPC outcome, and to identify biomarker and data requirements to be tested in future precision oncology trials.

DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

We analyzed deep longitudinal clinical, neuroendocrine expression, and autopsy data of 33 men who died from mPC between 1995 and 2004 (PELICAN33), and related findings to mPC biomarkers reported in the literature.

INTERVENTION

Thirty-three men prospectively consented to participate in an integrated clinical-molecular rapid autopsy study of mPC.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Data exploration with correction for multiple testing and survival analysis from the time of diagnosis to time to death and time to first occurrence of severe pain as outcomes were carried out. The effect of seven complications on the modeled probability of dying within 2 yr after presenting with the complication was evaluated using logistic regression.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Feature exploration revealed novel phenotypes related to mPC outcome. Four complications (pleural effusion, severe anemia, severe or controlled pain, and bone fracture) predict the likelihood of death within 2 yr. Men with Gleason grade group 5 cancers developed severe pain sooner than those with lower-grade tumors. Surprisingly, neuroendocrine (NE) differentiation was frequently observed in the setting of high serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels (≥30 ng/ml). In 4/33 patients, no controlled (requiring analgesics) or severe pain was detected, and strikingly, 14/15 metastatic sites studied in these men did not express NE markers, suggesting an inverse relationship between NE differentiation and pain in mPC. Intracranial subdural metastasis is common (36%) and is usually clinically undetected. Categorization of "skeletal-related events" complications used in recent studies likely obscures the understanding of spinal cord compression and fracture. Early death from prostate cancer was identified in a subgroup of men with a low longitudinal PSA bandwidth. Cachexia is common (body mass index <0.89 in 24/31 patients) but limited to the last year of life. Biomarker review identified 30 categories of mPC biomarkers in need of winnowing in future trials. All findings require validation in larger cohorts, preferably alongside data from this study.

CONCLUSIONS

The study identified novel outcome subgroups for future validation and provides "vision for mPC precision oncology 2020-2050" draft recommendations for future data collection and biomarker studies.

PATIENT SUMMARY

To better understand variation in metastatic prostate cancer behavior, we assembled and analyzed longitudinal clinical and autopsy records in 33 men. We identified novel outcomes, phenotypes, and aspects of disease burden to be tested and refined in future trials.

Discordant prostate specific antigen test results despite WHO assay standardization

Introduction:

Total PSA (tPSA) and free PSA (fPSA) are the most commonly used biomarkers for early detection of prostate cancer. Despite standardization efforts, many available PSA assays may still produce discordant results. In the present study, we compared four PSA assays calibrated to the WHO standards 96/670 and 96/668 for tPSA and fPSA, respectively.

Methods:

Within the scope of the Prostate Cancer Early Detection Study Based on a ‘‘Baseline’’ PSA Value in Young Men (PROBASE), we tested tPSA and fPSA in serum samples from 50 patients in the four different PROBASE sites using four WHO-calibrated assays from Roche (Elecsys, Cobas), Beckman-Coulter (Access-II) and Siemens (ADVIA Centaur). The comparison was performed using the Passing–Bablok regression method.

Results:

Compared to Access, the median tPSA levels for Centaur, Elecsys, and Cobas were +3%, +11%–20%, and +17%–23%, respectively, while for median fPSA levels the differences for Centaur, Elecsys, and Cobas were +49%, +29%–31%, and +22%, respectively.

Discussion:

Despite all investigated assays being WHO-calibrated, the Elecsys and Cobas tPSA assays produced considerably higher results than the Access and Centaur assays. Differences in fPSA-recovery between all investigated assays were even more pronounced. When applying the tPSA cutoff of 3.1 μg/L recommended for WHO-calibrated assays, the use of higher calibrated assays may lead to unnecessary prostate biopsies. Conversely, if the historical threshold of 4 μg/L is applied when using WHO-calibrated assays, it could lead to falsely omitted prostate biopsies.

20–25% Lower Concentrations of Total and Free Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) after Calibration of PSA Assays to the WHO Reference Materials – Analysis of 1098 Patients in Four Centers

Aim

To examine the potential clinical implications of the recalibration of total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and free PSA (fPSA) assays to the World Health Organization (WHO) standard materials.

Material and methods

Data from 1098 patients with or without clinically detected prostate cancer (PCa) from four independent cohort studies were compared using commercial assays calibrated to the traditional Hybritech® PSA (PSA-Hyb) and fPSA (fPSA-Hyb) standards and to the WHO 96/670 (PSA-WHO) and 96/668 (fPSA-WHO) standards. The Access® Immunoassay System (Beckman Coulter, Inc.) was used in all studies.

Results

All studies showed 20% to 25% lower PSA and fPSA test results with the WHO-standardized assays. No significant change in %fPSA (fPSA/PSA × 100) was observed. Continuing to use the traditional clinical PSA cutoffs obtained with the Hybritech standard after changing to the PSA-WHO standard could result in up to one-third of prostate cancer cases being missed. Conclusions: Manufacturers should fully inform laboratories about a calibration change and its clinical impact. Laboratory reports for PSA measurements should indicate the assay's manufacturer and which calibration standard was used to avoid misleading information concerning PCa risk

The complexity of PSA interpretation in clinical practice

Prostate specific antigen (PSA) is central to the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Laboratories quote cut-off reference ranges for PSA but values within these boundaries do not equate with an absence of cancer nor do levels above the range equate with its presence. Convention places the cut-off value at 4 μg/L when calibrated to the Hybritech immunoassay technology and 3.0 or 3.1 μg/L if the PSA methods are calibrated to the WHO IRP 96/670 standard. The prevalence of prostate cancer in screened normal men over 55 years of age with PSA values less than 4 μg/L (Hybritech method) is 10.1% at a PSA of 0.6-1.0 μg/L. About 12.5% of these will be high grade. Two major randomised trials reported on PSA screening. The European trial (ERSPC) reported a risk reduction for prostate cancer death of 21% in the screened group but the US PLCO trial found no benefit. PSA results depend on calibration and there is a 22% difference between the older Hybritech and newer WHO standardisation. Biological variation in PSA is a geometric mean of 7.3%. External quality assessment schemes show wide variation in the performance of PSA analysis. Neither the American College of Physicians nor the UK National Health Service recommends screening except when there is increased risk through family history or ethnicity. Laboratories should detail their method calibration in each report and clinicians should be alerted to the potential misclassification of patients through PSA variation.

Prostate cancer: WHO standardization of PSA tests: clinical consequences

The introduction of WHO standards for PSA assays is a step forward for improving the comparability of these tests. our current clinical decision limits, however, were validated using traditional calibrators. The threshold for biopsy must be adjusted when using the new standards.

Early prostate-specific antigen changes and the diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To delineate how recent findings on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) can improve prediction of risk, detection, and prediction of clinical endpoints of prostate cancer (PCa).

RECENT FINDINGS

The widely used PSA cut-point of 4.0 ng/ml increasingly appears arbitrary, but no cut-point achieves both high sensitivity and high specificity. The accuracy of detecting PCa can be increased by additional predictive factors and a combinations of markers. Evidence implies that a panel of kallikrein markers improves the specificity and reduces costs by eliminating unnecessary biopsies. Large, population-based studies have provided evidence that PSA can be used to predict PCa risk many years in advance, improve treatment selection and patient care, and predict the risk of complications and disease recurrence. However, definitive evidence is currently lacking as to whether PSA screening lowers PCa -specific mortality.

SUMMARY

PSA is still the main tool for early detection, risk stratification, and monitoring of PCa. However, PSA values are affected by many technical and biological factors. Instead of using a fixed PSA cut-point, using statistical prediction models and considering the integration additional markers may be able to improve and individualize PCa diagnostics. A single PSA measurement at early middle age can predict risk of advanced PCa decades in advance and stratify patients for intensity of subsequent screening.