1
|
Nicolau V, Brandão D, Rua T, Escoval A. Organisation and integrated healthcare approaches for people living with HIV, multimorbidity, or both: a systematic review. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:1579. [PMID: 37596539 PMCID: PMC10439547 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-16485-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Universal recommendation for antiretroviral drugs and their effectiveness has put forward the challenge of assuring a chronic and continued care approach to PLHIV (People Living with HIV), pressured by aging and multimorbidity. Integrated approaches are emerging which are more responsive to that reality. Studying those approaches, and their relation to the what of delivery arrangements and the how of implementation processes, may support future strategies to attain more effective organizational responses. METHODS We reviewed empirical studies on either HIV, multimorbidity, or both. The studies were published between 2011 and 2020, describing integrated approaches, their design, implementation, and evaluation strategy. Quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods were included. Electronic databases reviewed cover PubMed, SCOPUS, and Web of Science. A narrative analysis was conducted on each study, and data extraction was accomplished according to the Effective Practice and Organisation of Care taxonomy of health systems interventions. RESULTS A total of 30 studies, reporting 22 different interventions, were analysed. In general, interventions were grounded and guided by models and frameworks, and focused on specific subpopulations, or priority groups at increased risk of poorer outcomes. Interventions mixed multiple integrated components. Delivery arrangements targeted more frequently clinical integration (n = 13), and care in proximity, community or online-telephone based (n = 15). Interventions reported investments in the role of users, through self-management support (n = 16), and in coordination, through multidisciplinary teams (n = 9) and continuity of care (n = 8). Implementation strategies targeted educational and training activities (n = 12), and less often, mechanisms of iterative improvement (n = 3). At the level of organizational design and governance, interventions mobilised users and communities through representation, at boards and committees, and through consultancy, along different phases of the design process (n = 11). CONCLUSION The data advance important lessons and considerations to take steps forward from disease-focused care to integrated care at two critical levels: design and implementation. Multidisciplinary work, continuity of care, and meaningful engagement of users seem crucial to attain care that is comprehensive and more proximal, within or cross organizations, or sectors. Promising practices are advanced at the level of design, implementation, and evaluation, that set integration as a continued process of improvement and value professionals and users' knowledge as assets along those phases. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO number CRD42020194117.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa Nicolau
- NOVA National School of Public Health, Public Health Research Center, Comprehensive Health Research Center, CHRC, NOVA University Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
| | - Daniela Brandão
- NOVA National School of Public Health, Public Health Research Center, Comprehensive Health Research Center, CHRC, NOVA University Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - Ana Escoval
- NOVA National School of Public Health, Public Health Research Center, Comprehensive Health Research Center, CHRC, NOVA University Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Michielsen L, Bischoff EWMA, Schermer T, Laurant M. Primary healthcare competencies needed in the management of person-centred integrated care for chronic illness and multimorbidity: Results of a scoping review. BMC PRIMARY CARE 2023; 24:98. [PMID: 37046190 PMCID: PMC10091550 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-023-02050-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic disease management is important in primary care. Disease management programmes focus primarily on the respective diseases. The occurrence of multimorbidity and social problems is addressed to a limited extent. Person-centred integrated care (PC-IC) is an alternative approach, putting the patient at the centre of care. This asks for additional competencies for healthcare professionals involved in the execution of PC-IC. In this scoping review we researched which competencies are necessary for healthcare professionals working in collaborative teams where the focus lies within the concept of PC-IC. We also explored how these competencies can be acquired. METHODS Six literature databases and grey literature were searched for guidelines and peer-reviewed articles on chronic illness and multimorbidity in primary care. A data synthesis was carried out resulting in an overview of the competencies that healthcare professionals need to deliver PC-IC. RESULTS Four guidelines and 21 studies were included and four core competencies could be derived through the synthesis: 1. interprofessional communication, 2, interprofessional collaborative teamwork, 3. leadership and 4. patient-centred communication. Included papers mostly lack a clear description of the competencies in terms of knowledge, skills and attitudes which are necessary for a PC-IC approach and on how these competencies can be acquired. CONCLUSION This review provides insight on competencies necessary to provide PC-IC within primary care. Research is needed in more depth on core concepts of these competencies which will then benefit educational programmes to ensure that healthcare professionals in primary care are better equipped to deliver PC-IC for patients with chronic illness and multimorbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leslie Michielsen
- School of Health Studies, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Erik W M A Bischoff
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Tjard Schermer
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Science Support Office, Gelre Hospitals, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands
| | - Miranda Laurant
- School of Health Studies, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Radboud University Medical Centre, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
STANGE KURTC, MILLER WILLIAML, ETZ REBECCAS. The Role of Primary Care in Improving Population Health. Milbank Q 2023; 101:795-840. [PMID: 37096603 PMCID: PMC10126984 DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2022] [Revised: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 04/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Policy Points Systems based on primary care have better population health, health equity, and health care quality, and lower health care expenditure. Primary care can be a boundary-spanning force to integrate and personalize the many factors from which population health emerges. Equitably advancing population health requires understanding and supporting the complexly interacting mechanisms by which primary care influences health, equity, and health costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- KURT C. STANGE
- Center for Community Health IntegrationCase Western Reserve University
| | - WILLIAM L. MILLER
- Lehigh Valley Health System and University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Coteur K, Matheï C, Schoenmakers B, Van Nuland M. Co-design to increase implementation of insomnia guidelines in primary care. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2022; 105:3558-3565. [PMID: 36075810 PMCID: PMC9425708 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.08.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Revised: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/27/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sleep disorders, including insomnia, are widespread problems, which have increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. Guidelines for the treatment of insomnia prioritize non-pharmacological interventions. Nevertheless, primary care professionals lack well-developed material for patient education, that could help implement the treatment guidelines in Flanders, Belgium. OBJECTIVE This project's purpose is to develop complementary, written educational material, grounded in the principles of evidence-based practice, for primary care. PATIENT INVOLVEMENT This co-design project involved patients and health professionals. Special attention was given to including patients with low health literacy, and empowering patients when designing in mixed groups. METHODS Based on the framework of Sanders and Stappers (2014), data were collected and analyzed in four phases. Pre-design, needs were explored using think-aloud studies and focus groups. Next, for generative purposes, the design studio method was used. Then, evaluation of the prototype happened with another series of think-aloud studies. Finally, post-design, implementation of the product was evaluated with a short survey. RESULTS Twenty-five participants (10 patients and 15 healthcare professionals) contributed to the development of an educational patient leaflet called Sssssst. How do you sleep (at night)? Out of 30 professionals who received the printed leaflet for use in practice, 17 provided feedback after six months. Generally, the leaflet was well received. Visual design aspects stimulated use in practice. DISCUSSION Written and visual materials aid primary care professionals to educate patients on sleep and insomnia. This supporting tool also stimulates self-management in patients. Although inspiring and educational for all stakeholders, a co-design approach is no guarantee for the product to "fit all".
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristien Coteur
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Catharina Matheï
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Marc Van Nuland
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Huang H, Wang HHX, Donaghy E, Henderson D, Mercer SW. Using self-determination theory in research and evaluation in primary care. Health Expect 2022; 25:2700-2708. [PMID: 36181716 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Revised: 09/17/2022] [Accepted: 09/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multimorbidity (the co-existence of two or more long-term conditions within an individual) is a complex management challenge, with a very limited evidence base. Theories can help in the design and operationalization of complex interventions. OBJECTIVE This article proposes self-determination theory (SDT) as a candidate theory for the development and evaluation of interventions in multimorbidity. METHODS We provide an overview of SDT, its use in research to date, and its potential utility in complex interventions for patients with multimorbidity based on the new MRC framework. RESULTS SDT-based interventions have mainly focused on health behaviour change in the primary prevention of disease, with limited use in primary care and chronic conditions management. However, SDT may be a useful candidate theory in informing complex intervention development and evaluation, both in randomized controlled trials and in evaluations of 'natural experiments'. We illustrate how it could be used multimorbidity interventions in primary care by drawing on the example of CARE Plus (a primary care-based complex intervention for patients with multimorbidity in deprived areas of Scotland). CONCLUSIONS SDT may have utility in both the design and evaluation of complex interventions for multimorbidity. Further research is required to establish its usefulness, and limitations, compared with other candidate theories. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Our funded research programme, of which this paper is an early output, has a newly embedded patient and public involvement group of four members with lived experience of long-term conditions and/or of being informal carers. They read and commented on the draft manuscript and made useful suggestions on the text. They will be fully involved at all stages in the rest of the programme of research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huayi Huang
- Usher Institute Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Harry H X Wang
- School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Sheng, China
| | - Eddie Donaghy
- Usher Institute Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - David Henderson
- Usher Institute Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Stewart W Mercer
- Usher Institute Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Beaudin J, Chouinard MC, Girard A, Houle J, Ellefsen É, Hudon C. Integrated self-management support provided by primary care nurses to persons with chronic diseases and common mental disorders: a scoping review. BMC Nurs 2022; 21:212. [PMID: 35918723 PMCID: PMC9344621 DOI: 10.1186/s12912-022-01000-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM To map integrated and non-integrated self-management support interventions provided by primary care nurses to persons with chronic diseases and common mental disorders and describe their characteristics. DESIGN A scoping review. DATA SOURCES In April 2020, we conducted searches in several databases (Academic Research Complete, AMED, CINAHL, ERIC, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, Emcare, HealthSTAR, Proquest Central) using self-management support, nurse, primary care and their related terms. Of the resulting 4241 articles, 30 were included into the analysis. REVIEW METHODS We used the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care to identify integrated self-management interventions and to analyze the data and the PRISMS taxonomy for the description of interventions. Study selection and data synthesis were performed by the team. Self-management support interventions were considered integrated if they were consistent with the Rainbow model's definition of clinical integration and person-focused care. RESULTS The 30 selected articles related to 10 self-management support interventions. Among these, five interventions were considered integrated. The delivery of the interventions showed variability. Strategies used were education, problem-solving therapies, action planning, and goal setting. Integrated self-management support intervention characteristics were nurse-person relationship, engagement, and biopsychosocial approach. A framework for integrated self-management was proposed. The main characteristics of the non-integrated self-management support were disease-specific approach, protocol-driven, and lack of adaptability. CONCLUSION Our review synthesizes integrated and non-integrated self-management support interventions and their characteristics. We propose recommendations to improve its clinical integration. However, further theoretical clarification and qualitative research are needed. IMPLICATION FOR NURSING Self-management support is an important activity for primary care nurses and persons with chronic diseases and common mental disorders, who are increasingly present in primary care, and require an integrated approach. IMPACT This review addresses the paucity of details surrounding integrated self-management support for persons with chronic diseases and common mental disorders and provides a framework to better describe its characteristics. The findings could be used to design future research and improve the clinical integration of this activity by nurses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jérémie Beaudin
- Faculté de Médecine Et Des Sciences de La Santé, Université de Sherbrooke, 12e Avenue Nord, Sherbrooke, Québec, 3001J1H 5N4, Canada.
| | - Maud-Christine Chouinard
- Faculté Des Sciences Infirmières, Université de Montréal, Pavillon Marguerite-d'Youville, C.P. 6128 succ. Centre-ville, Montréal, Québec, H3C 3J7, Canada
| | - Ariane Girard
- Faculté de Médecine, Université Laval, VITAM Research Center On Sustainable Health, 2601, Chemin de La Canardière (G-2300), Québec, Québec, G1J 2G3, Canada
| | - Janie Houle
- Département de Psychologie, Université du Québec À Montréal, case postale 8888, succ. Centre-ville, Montréal, Québec, H3C 3P8, Canada
| | - Édith Ellefsen
- École des sciences infirmières, Faculté de Médecine Et Des Sciences de La Santé, Université de Sherbrooke, 12e Avenue Nord, Sherbrooke, Québec, 3001J1H 5N4, Canada
| | - Catherine Hudon
- Faculté de Médecine Et Des Sciences de La Santé, Université de Sherbrooke, 12e Avenue Nord, Sherbrooke, Québec, 3001J1H 5N4, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Ageing, the accrual of molecular and cellular damage over a lifetime confers progressive physiologic dysfunction of bodily systems, leaving the body in a heightened state of vulnerability to biophysical and psychosocial stressors. The inflection point is frailty which easily leads to disability and death. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) creates biophysical and psychosocial stresses difficult for even optimally fit patients to cope with. With evolving ILD treatment pathways, people with ILD are living longer. RECENT FINDINGS ILD and ageing are bi-directionally influential: ILD, its treatments, complications, and collateral systemic extra-pulmonary damage (hypoxic and oxidative stress) wear on the ageing person and ageing impacts a person's tolerance of ILD. ILD extent may proportionally accelerate age-related vulnerabilities. ILD related to inflammatory systemic diseases, e.g. connective tissue diseases or sarcoidosis, exert an even more complex biophysical impact on the body. SUMMARY The present review stresses goals of preventing frailty in ILD and preserving general health and well being of people living with ILD of any age, from time of diagnosis and as they age. The development of a prediction score is proposed to classify those at risk of frailty and guide interventions that preserve successful ageing for all levels of ILD severity. VIDEO ABSTRACT http://links.lww.com/COPM/A32.
Collapse
|
8
|
Parkes T, Matheson C, Carver H, Foster R, Budd J, Liddell D, Wallace J, Pauly B, Fotopoulou M, Burley A, Anderson I, MacLennan G. A peer-delivered intervention to reduce harm and improve the well-being of homeless people with problem substance use: the SHARPS feasibility mixed-methods study. Health Technol Assess 2022; 26:1-128. [PMID: 35212621 PMCID: PMC8899911 DOI: 10.3310/wvvl4786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For people experiencing homelessness and problem substance use, access to appropriate services can be challenging. There is evidence that development of trusting relationships with non-judgemental staff can facilitate service engagement. Peer-delivered approaches show particular promise, but the evidence base is still developing. This study tested the feasibility and acceptability of a peer-delivered intervention, through 'Peer Navigators', to support people who are homeless with problem substance use to address a range of health and social issues. OBJECTIVES The study objectives were to design and implement a peer-delivered, relational intervention to reduce harms and improve health/well-being, quality of life and social functioning for people experiencing homelessness and problem substance use, and to conduct a concurrent process evaluation to inform a future randomised controlled trial. DESIGN A mixed-methods feasibility study with concurrent process evaluation was conducted, involving qualitative interviews [staff interviews (one time point), n = 12; Peer Navigator interviews (three or four time points), n = 15; intervention participant interviews: first time point, n = 24, and second time point, n = 10], observations and quantitative outcome measures. SETTING The intervention was delivered in three outreach services for people who are homeless in Scotland, and three Salvation Army hostels in England; there were two standard care settings: an outreach service in Scotland and a hostel in England. PARTICIPANTS Participants were people experiencing homelessness and problem substance use (n = 68) (intervention). INTERVENTION This was a peer-delivered, relational intervention drawing on principles of psychologically informed environments, with Peer Navigators providing practical and emotional support. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Outcomes relating to participants' substance use, participants' physical and mental health needs, and the quality of Peer Navigator relationships were measured via a 'holistic health check', with six questionnaires completed at two time points: a specially created sociodemographic, health and housing status questionnaire; the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 items plus the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7; the Maudsley Addiction Profile; the Substance Use Recovery Evaluator; the RAND Corporation Short Form survey-36 items; and the Consultation and Relational Empathy Measure. RESULTS The Supporting Harm Reduction through Peer Support (SHARPS) study was found to be acceptable to, and feasible for, intervention participants, staff and Peer Navigators. Among participants, there was reduced drug use and an increase in the number of prescriptions for opioid substitution therapy. There were reductions in risky injecting practice and risky sexual behaviour. Participants reported improvements to service engagement and felt more equipped to access services on their own. The lived experience of the Peer Navigators was highlighted as particularly helpful, enabling the development of trusting, authentic and meaningful relationships. The relationship with the Peer Navigator was measured as excellent at baseline and follow-up. Some challenges were experienced in relation to the 'fit' of the intervention within some settings and will inform future studies. LIMITATIONS Some participants did not complete the outcome measures, or did not complete both sets, meaning that we do not have baseline and/or follow-up data for all. The standard care data sample sizes make comparison between settings limited. CONCLUSIONS A randomised controlled trial is recommended to assess the effectiveness of the Peer Navigator intervention. FUTURE WORK A definitive cluster randomised controlled trial should particularly consider setting selection, outcomes and quantitative data collection instruments. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial is registered as ISRCTN15900054. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 26, No. 14. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessa Parkes
- Salvation Army Centre for Addiction Services and Research, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Catriona Matheson
- Salvation Army Centre for Addiction Services and Research, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Hannah Carver
- Salvation Army Centre for Addiction Services and Research, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Rebecca Foster
- Salvation Army Centre for Addiction Services and Research, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - John Budd
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | | | - Bernie Pauly
- The Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, University of Victoria, Greater Victoria, BC, Canada
| | - Maria Fotopoulou
- Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Adam Burley
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Isobel Anderson
- Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Graeme MacLennan
- The Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials (CHaRT), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
McCallum M, Gray CM, Hanlon P, O'Brien R, Mercer SW. Exploring the utility of self-determination theory in complex interventions in multimorbidity: A qualitative analysis of patient experiences of the CARE Plus intervention. Chronic Illn 2021; 17:433-450. [PMID: 31674216 DOI: 10.1177/1742395319884106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES CARE Plus is a primary-care-based complex intervention for patients with multimorbidity living in areas of high socioeconomic deprivation. This study explores patients' experience of the intervention and whether self-determination theory is useful to understand reported impacts. METHOD Thematic analysis of semistructured interviews of 14 participants conducted during a randomised controlled trial of CARE Plus. Improvement in wellbeing in daily lives following CARE Plus was estimated from participants' accounts of their experiences of the intervention. FINDINGS Participants valued the CARE Plus consultations irrespective of perceived improvements. Six participants reported changes in wellbeing that improved daily life, three reported slight improvement (not impacting daily life) and five no improvement. Evidence of satisfaction of the three major self-determination theory psychological needs - relatedness, competence and autonomy - was prominent in the accounts of those experiencing improved wellbeing in daily life; this group also spoke in ways congruent with more self-determined motivational regulation. These changes were not evident in those with little or no improvement in wellbeing. DISCUSSION This study suggests self-determination theory has utility in understanding the impact of CARE Plus on patients and may be a useful theory to inform development of future interventions to improve outcomes for patients with multimorbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianne McCallum
- General Practice and Primary Care, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland
| | - Cindy M Gray
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland
| | - Peter Hanlon
- General Practice and Primary Care, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland
| | - Rosaleen O'Brien
- Department of Psychology, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland
| | - Stewart W Mercer
- Centre for Population Health Sciences, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Old Medical School, Edinburgh, Scotland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rzewuska M, Carolina Guidorizzi Zanetti A, Skea ZC, Moscovici L, Almeida de Oliveira C, Mazzoncini de Azevedo-Marques J. Mental-physical multimorbidity treatment adherence challenges in Brazilian primary care: A qualitative study with patients and their healthcare providers. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0251320. [PMID: 33983998 PMCID: PMC8118469 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2020] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Improved understanding of multimorbidity (MM) treatment adherence in primary health care (PHC) in Brazil is needed to achieve better healthcare and service outcomes. This study explored experiences of healthcare providers (HCP) and primary care patients (PCP) with mental-physical MM treatment adherence. Adults PCP with mental-physical MM and their primary care and community mental health care providers were recruited through maximum variation sampling from nine cities in São Paulo State, Southeast of Brazil. Experiences across quality domains of the Primary Care Assessment Tool-Brazil were explored through semi-structured in-depth interviews with 19 PCP and 62 HCP, conducted between April 2016 and April 2017. Through thematic conent analysis ten meta-themes concerning treatment adherence were developed: 1) variability and accessibility of treatment options available through PHC; 2) importance of coming to terms with a disease for treatment initation; 3) importance of person-centred communication for treatment initiation and maintenance; 4) information sources about received medication; 5) monitoring medication adherence; 6) taking medication unsafely; 7) perceived reasons for medication non-adherence; 8) most challenging health behavior change goals; 9) main motives for initiation or maintenance of treatment; 10) methods deployed to improve treatment adherence. Our analysis has advanced the understanding of complexity inherent to treatment adherence in mental-physical MM and revealed opportunities for improvement and specific solutions to effect adherence in Brazil. Our findings can inform research efforts to transform MM care through optimization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magdalena Rzewuska
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Scotland, United Kingdom
- Public Health Postgraduate Program, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Ana Carolina Guidorizzi Zanetti
- Department of Psychiatric Nursing and Human Sciences, University of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto College of Nursing, WHO Collaborating Centre for Nursing Research Development, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Zoë C. Skea
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Leonardo Moscovici
- Department of Social Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- Primary Health Care, Academic Health Services Complex at Ribeirão Preto Medical School of the São Paulo University, XIII Regional Health Department, Unified Health System, São Paulo State, Brazil
| | - Camila Almeida de Oliveira
- Public Health Postgraduate Program, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - João Mazzoncini de Azevedo-Marques
- Public Health Postgraduate Program, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Social Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- Primary Health Care, Academic Health Services Complex at Ribeirão Preto Medical School of the São Paulo University, XIII Regional Health Department, Unified Health System, São Paulo State, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Primary care consultation length by deprivation and multimorbidity in England: an observational study using electronic patient records. Br J Gen Pract 2021; 71:e185-e192. [PMID: 33318089 PMCID: PMC7744040 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20x714029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2020] [Accepted: 08/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Longer GP consultations are recommended as one way of improving care for people with multimorbidity. In Scotland, patients who are multimorbid and living in deprived areas do not have longer consultations, although their counterparts in the least deprived areas do. This example of the inverse care law has not been examined in England. Aim To assess GP consultation length by socioeconomic deprivation and multimorbidity. Design and setting Random sample of 1.2 million consultations from 1 April 2014 to 31 March 2016 for 190 036 adults in England drawn from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Method Consultation duration was derived from time of opening and closing the patient’s electronic record. Mean duration was estimated by multimorbidity level and type, adjusted for number of consultations and other patient and staff characteristics and patient and practice random effects. Results Consultations lasted 10.9 minutes on average and mean duration increased with number of conditions. Patients with ≥6 conditions had 0.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.8 to 1.0) minutes longer than those with none. Patients who are multimorbid and with a mental health condition had 0.5 (CI = 0.4 to 0.5) minutes longer than patients who were not multimorbid. However, consultations were 0.5 (CI = 0.4 to 0.5) minutes shorter in the most compared with the least deprived fifth of areas at all levels of multimorbidity. Conclusion GPs in England spend longer with patients who have more conditions, but, at all multimorbidity levels, those in deprived areas have less time per GP consultation. Further research is needed to assess the impact of consultation length on patient and system outcomes for those with multimorbidity.
Collapse
|
12
|
Valaitis R, Longaphy J, Ploeg J, Agarwal G, Oliver D, Nair K, Kastner M, Avilla E, Dolovich L. Health TAPESTRY: co-designing interprofessional primary care programs for older adults using the persona-scenario method. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2019; 20:122. [PMID: 31484493 PMCID: PMC6727539 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-019-1013-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2018] [Accepted: 08/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Background Working with patients and health care providers to co-design health interventions is gaining global prominence. While co-design of interventions is important for all patients, it is particularly important for older adults who often experience multiple and complex chronic conditions. Persona-scenarios have been used by designers of technology applications. The purpose of this paper is to explore how a modified approach to the persona-scenario method was used to co-design a complex primary health care intervention (Health TAPESTRY) by and for older adults and providers and the value added of this approach. Methods The persona-scenario method involved patient and clinician participants from two academically-linked primary care practices. Local prospective volunteers and community service providers (e.g., home care services, support services) were also recruited. Persona-scenario workshops were facilitated by researchers experienced in qualitative methods. Working mostly in homogenous pairs, participants created a fictitious but authentic persona that represented people like themselves. Core components of the Health TAPESTRY intervention were described. Then, participants created a story (scenario) involving their persona and an aspect of the proposed Health TAPESTRY program (e.g., volunteer roles). Two stages of analysis involved descriptive identification of themes, followed by an interpretive phase to extract possible actions and products related to ideas in each theme. Results Fourteen persona-scenario workshops were held involving patients (n = 15), healthcare providers/community care providers (n = 29), community service providers (n = 12), and volunteers (n = 14). Fifty themes emerged under four Health TAPESTRY components and a fifth category - patient. Eight cross cutting themes highlighted areas integral to the intervention. In total, 414 actions were identified and 406 products were extracted under the themes, of which 44.8% of the products (n = 182) were novel. The remaining 224 had been considered by the research team. Conclusions The persona-scenario method drew out feasible novel ideas from stakeholders, which expanded on the research team’s original ideas and highlighted interactions among components and stakeholder groups. Many ideas were integrated into the Health TAPESTRY program’s design and implementation. Persona-scenario method added significant value worthy of the added time it required. This method presents a promising alternative to active engagement of multiple stakeholders in the co-design of complex interventions. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12875-019-1013-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruta Valaitis
- School of Nursing, McMaster University, HSC 3N25,1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada.
| | - Jennifer Longaphy
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, David Braley Health Sciences Centre, 100 Main Street West, 5th floor, Hamilton, Ontario, L8P 1H6, Canada
| | - Jenny Ploeg
- School of Nursing, McMaster University, HSC 3N25,1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada
| | - Gina Agarwal
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, David Braley Health Sciences Centre, 100 Main Street West, 5th floor, Hamilton, Ontario, L8P 1H6, Canada
| | - Doug Oliver
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, David Braley Health Sciences Centre, 100 Main Street West, 5th floor, Hamilton, Ontario, L8P 1H6, Canada
| | - Kalpana Nair
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, David Braley Health Sciences Centre, 100 Main Street West, 5th floor, Hamilton, Ontario, L8P 1H6, Canada
| | - Monika Kastner
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 3M6, Canada
| | - Ernie Avilla
- Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology & Allergy, HSC 3V47, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada
| | - Lisa Dolovich
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, David Braley Health Sciences Centre, 100 Main Street West, 5th floor, Hamilton, Ontario, L8P 1H6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hendry GJ, Fenocchi L, Mason H, Steultjens M. The impact of multimorbidity on foot health outcomes in podiatry patients with musculoskeletal foot pain: a prospective observational study. J Foot Ankle Res 2019; 12:36. [PMID: 31312257 PMCID: PMC6609344 DOI: 10.1186/s13047-019-0346-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2019] [Accepted: 06/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Multimorbidity is prevalent and adversely affects health outcomes. Foot pain is common and one of the primary reasons for utilisation of podiatry services. At present, little is known about the impact of multimorbidity on foot health and related outcomes following podiatric intervention. The aims of this study were to evaluate whether there is a difference in foot health outcomes following exposure to podiatric foot care for people with and without multimorbidity; and ii) to evaluate whether the presence or absence of multimorbidity affects patients’ perceptions of change in foot pain. Methods The PROMFoot study is a prospective cohort study of adults with a new episode of foot pain attending the podiatry service within the NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde health board. Baseline medical comorbidity status (no condition, single condition, multiple conditions), longitudinal data on foot health measured using the Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ), and patient rating of change scores for foot pain were obtained from the PROMFoot study at baseline, and 3 and 6 months after podiatric intervention. Foot health scores (pain, function, footwear and general foot health) and perceptions of change for foot pain were compared between comorbidity groups. Results A total of 115 participants (59% female) with a mean age of 55 years were included. Multimorbidity was common, affecting 61 participants (53%); while 28 (24.3%) and 26 (22.6%) reported single or no medical comorbidities respectively. Significantly worse foot health scores for all FHSQ domains were observed for the multimorbidity group at baseline, 3 and 6 months. Change scores for foot pain were similar between groups and demonstrate modest improvements, however multimorbidity group membership was strongly associated with a perceptions of change in foot pain. Multimorbidity was independently associated with poorer foot function outcomes at 3 months, and poorer foot pain and foot function outcomes at 6 months. Conclusions Multimorbidity was associated with poor foot health outcomes and lower rates of self-perceived improvement in foot pain over 6 months following podiatric intervention in a sample of patients attending podiatric biomechanics clinics for a new episode of foot pain. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13047-019-0346-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gordon J Hendry
- 1Centre for Living, School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, G4 0BA Scotland UK
| | - Linda Fenocchi
- 1Centre for Living, School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, G4 0BA Scotland UK.,2Yunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, G4 0BA Scotland UK
| | - Helen Mason
- 2Yunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, G4 0BA Scotland UK
| | - Martijn Steultjens
- 1Centre for Living, School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, G4 0BA Scotland UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bunn F, Goodman C, Russell B, Wilson P, Manthorpe J, Rait G, Hodkinson I, Durand MA. Supporting shared decision-making for older people with multiple health and social care needs: a realist synthesis. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2018. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr06280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundHealth-care systems are increasingly moving towards more integrated approaches. Shared decision-making (SDM) is central to these models but may be complicated by the need to negotiate and communicate decisions between multiple providers, as well as patients and their family carers; this is particularly the case for older people with complex needs.ObjectivesTo provide a context-relevant understanding of how models to facilitate SDM might work for older people with multiple health and care needs and how they might be applied to integrated care models.DesignRealist synthesis following Realist and Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards (RAMESES) publication standards.ParticipantsTwenty-four stakeholders took part in interviews.Data sourcesElectronic databases including MEDLINE (via PubMed), The Cochrane Library, Scopus, Google and Google Scholar (Google Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA). Lateral searches were also carried out. All types of evidence were included.Review methodsIterative stakeholder-driven, three-stage approach, involving (1) scoping of the literature and stakeholder interviews (n = 13) to develop initial programme theory/ies, (2) systematic searches for evidence to test and develop the theories and (3) validation of programme theory/ies with stakeholders (n = 11).ResultsWe included 88 papers, of which 29 focused on older people or people with complex needs. We identified four theories (context–mechanism–outcome configurations) that together provide an account of what needs to be in place for SDM to work for older people with complex needs: understanding and assessing patient and carer values and capacity to access and use care; organising systems to support and prioritise SDM; supporting and preparing patients and family carers to engage in SDM; and a person-centred culture of which SDM is a part. Programmes likely to be successful in promoting SDM are those that create trust between those involved, allow service users to feel that they are respected and understood, and engender confidence to engage in SDM.LimitationsThere is a lack of evidence on interventions to promote SDM in older people with complex needs or on interprofessional approaches to SDM.ConclusionsModels of SDM for older people with complex health and care needs should be conceptualised as a series of conversations that patients, and their family carers, may have with a variety of different health and care professionals. To embed SDM in practice requires a shift from a biomedical focus to a more person-centred ethos. Service providers are likely to need support, both in terms of the way services are organised and delivered and in terms of their own continuing professional development. Older people with complex needs may need support to engage in SDM. How this support is best provided needs further exploration, although face-to-face interactions and ongoing patient–professional relationships are key.Future workThere is a need for further work to establish how organisational structures can be better aligned to meet the requirements of older people with complex needs. This includes a need to define and evaluate the contribution that different members of health and care teams can make to SDM for older people with complex health and care needs.Study registrationThis study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42016039013.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frances Bunn
- Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Claire Goodman
- Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Bridget Russell
- Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Patricia Wilson
- Centre for Health Service Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | - Jill Manthorpe
- Social Care Workforce Research Unit, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Greta Rait
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London Medical School (Royal Free Campus), London, UK
| | - Isabel Hodkinson
- Tower Hamlets Clinical Commissioning Group, The Tredegar Practice, London, UK
| | - Marie-Anne Durand
- The Preference Laboratory, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bunn F, Goodman C, Russell B, Wilson P, Manthorpe J, Rait G, Hodkinson I, Durand MA. Supporting shared decision making for older people with multiple health and social care needs: a realist synthesis. BMC Geriatr 2018; 18:165. [PMID: 30021527 PMCID: PMC6052575 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-018-0853-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2018] [Accepted: 06/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health care systems are increasingly moving towards more integrated approaches. Shared decision making (SDM) is central to these models but may be complicated by the need to negotiate and communicate decisions between multiple providers, as well as patients and their family carers; particularly for older people with complex needs. The aim of this review was to provide a context relevant understanding of how interventions to facilitate SDM might work for older people with multiple health and care needs, and how they might be applied in integrated care models. METHODS Iterative, stakeholder driven, realist synthesis following RAMESES publication standards. It involved: 1) scoping literature and stakeholder interviews (n = 13) to develop initial programme theory/ies, 2) systematic searches for evidence to test and develop the theories, and 3) validation of programme theory/ies with stakeholders (n = 11). We searched PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Scopus, Google, Google Scholar, and undertook lateral searches. All types of evidence were included. RESULTS We included 88 papers; 29 focused on older people or people with complex needs. We identified four context-mechanism-outcome configurations that together provide an account of what needs to be in place for SDM to work for older people with complex needs. This includes: understanding and assessing patient and carer values and capacity to access and use care, organising systems to support and prioritise SDM, supporting and preparing patients and family carers to engage in SDM and a person-centred culture of which SDM is a part. Programmes likely to be successful in promoting SDM are those that allow older people to feel that they are respected and understood, and that engender confidence to engage in SDM. CONCLUSIONS To embed SDM in practice requires a radical shift from a biomedical focus to a more person-centred ethos. Service providers will need support to change their professional behaviour and to better organise and deliver services. Face to face interactions, permission and space to discuss options, and continuity of patient-professional relationships are key in supporting older people with complex needs to engage in SDM. Future research needs to focus on inter-professional approaches to SDM and how families and carers are involved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frances Bunn
- Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL10 9AB UK
| | - Claire Goodman
- Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL10 9AB UK
| | - Bridget Russell
- Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL10 9AB UK
| | - Patricia Wilson
- Centre for Health Service Studies, University of Kent, George Allen Wing, Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NF UK
| | - Jill Manthorpe
- Social Care Workforce Research Unit, King’s College London, Strand, London, WC2B 4LL UK
| | - Greta Rait
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL Medical School (Royal Free Campus), Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF UK
| | - Isabel Hodkinson
- Tower Hamlets Clinical Commissioning Group, The Tredegar Practice, London, E3 5JD UK
| | - Marie-Anne Durand
- The Preference Laboratory, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Level 5, Williamson Translational Research Building, Lebanon, New Hampshire USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Johnston MC, Crilly M, Black C, Prescott GJ, Mercer SW. Defining and measuring multimorbidity: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Eur J Public Health 2018; 29:182-189. [DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/cky098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 253] [Impact Index Per Article: 42.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michael Crilly
- Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
- Public Health, NHS Grampian, Summerfield House, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Corri Black
- Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
- Public Health, NHS Grampian, Summerfield House, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Gordon J Prescott
- Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Stewart W Mercer
- General Practice and Primary Care, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Katikireddi SV, Skivington K, Leyland AH, Hunt K, Mercer SW. The contribution of risk factors to socioeconomic inequalities in multimorbidity across the lifecourse: a longitudinal analysis of the Twenty-07 cohort. BMC Med 2017; 15:152. [PMID: 28835246 PMCID: PMC5569487 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-017-0913-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2017] [Accepted: 07/10/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multimorbidity is a major challenge to health systems globally and disproportionately affects socioeconomically disadvantaged populations. We examined socioeconomic inequalities in developing multimorbidity across the lifecourse and investigated the contribution of five behaviour-related risk factors. METHODS The Twenty-07 study recruited participants aged approximately 15, 35, and 55 years in 1987 and followed them up over 20 years. The primary outcome was development of multimorbidity (2+ health conditions). The relationship between five different risk factors (smoking, alcohol consumption, diet, body mass index (BMI), physical activity) and the development of multimorbidity was assessed. Social patterning in the development of multimorbidity based on two measures of socioeconomic status (area-based deprivation and household income) was then determined, followed by investigation of potential mediation by the five risk factors. Multilevel logistic regression models and predictive margins were used for statistical analyses. Socioeconomic inequalities in multimorbidity were quantified using relative indices of inequality and attenuation assessed through addition of risk factors. RESULTS Multimorbidity prevalence increased markedly in all cohorts over the 20 years. Socioeconomic disadvantage was associated with increased risk of developing multimorbidity (most vs least deprived areas: odds ratio (OR) 1.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26-1.68), and the risk was at least as great when assessed by income (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.25-1.87) or when defining multimorbidity as 3+ conditions. Smoking (current vs never OR 1.56, 1.36-1.78), diet (no fruit/vegetable consumption in previous week vs consumption every day OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.33-1.84), and BMI (morbidly obese vs healthy weight OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.42-2.49) were strong independent predictors of developing multimorbidity. A dose-response relationship was observed with number of risk factors and subsequent multimorbidity (3+ risk factors vs none OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.57-2.33). However, the five risk factors combined explained only 40.8% of socioeconomic inequalities in multimorbidity development. CONCLUSIONS Preventive measures addressing known risk factors, particularly obesity and smoking, could reduce the future multimorbidity burden. However, major socioeconomic inequalities in the development of multimorbidity exist even after taking account of known risk factors. Tackling social determinants of health, including holistic health and social care, is necessary if the rising burden of multimorbidity in disadvantaged populations is to be redressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi
- MRC/CSO Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Top floor, 200 Renfield Street, Glasgow, G2 3QB, United Kingdom.
| | - Kathryn Skivington
- MRC/CSO Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Top floor, 200 Renfield Street, Glasgow, G2 3QB, United Kingdom
| | - Alastair H Leyland
- MRC/CSO Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Top floor, 200 Renfield Street, Glasgow, G2 3QB, United Kingdom
| | - Kate Hunt
- MRC/CSO Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Top floor, 200 Renfield Street, Glasgow, G2 3QB, United Kingdom
| | - Stewart W Mercer
- Department of General Practice & Primary Care, University of Glasgow, 1 Horselethill Road, Glasgow, G12 8UX, Scotland
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Mercer SW, Fitzpatrick B, Guthrie B, Fenwick E, Grieve E, Lawson K, Boyer N, McConnachie A, Lloyd SM, O'Brien R, Watt GCM, Wyke S. The CARE Plus study - a whole-system intervention to improve quality of life of primary care patients with multimorbidity in areas of high socioeconomic deprivation: exploratory cluster randomised controlled trial and cost-utility analysis. BMC Med 2016; 14:88. [PMID: 27328975 PMCID: PMC4916534 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-016-0634-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2015] [Accepted: 06/02/2016] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multimorbidity is common in deprived communities and reduces quality of life. Our aim was to evaluate a whole-system primary care-based complex intervention, called CARE Plus, to improve quality of life in multimorbid patients living in areas of very high deprivation. METHODS We used a phase 2 exploratory cluster randomised controlled trial with eight general practices in Glasgow in very deprived areas that involved multimorbid patients aged 30-65 years. The intervention comprised structured longer consultations, relationship continuity, practitioner support, and self-management support. Control practices continued treatment as usual. Primary outcomes were quality of life (EQ-5D-5L utility scores) and well-being (W-BQ12; 3 domains). Cost-effectiveness from a health service perspective, engagement, and retention were assessed. Recruitment and baseline measurements occurred prior to randomisation. Blinding post-randomisation was not possible but outcome measurement and analysis were masked. Analyses were by intention to treat. RESULTS Of 76 eligible practices contacted, 12 accepted, and eight were selected, randomised and participated for the duration of the trial. Of 225 eligible patients, 152 (68 %) participated and 67/76 (88 %) in each arm completed the 12-month assessment. Two patients died in the control group. CARE Plus significantly improved one domain of well-being (negative well-being), with an effect size of 0.33 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.11-0.55) at 12 months (p = 0.0036). Positive well-being, energy, and general well-being (the combined score of the three components) were not significantly influenced by the intervention at 12 months. EQ-5D-5L area under the curve over the 12 months was higher in the CARE Plus group (p = 0.002). The incremental cost in the CARE Plus group was £929 (95 % CI: £86-£1788) per participant with a gain in quality-adjusted life years of 0.076 (95 % CI: 0.028-0.124) over the 12 months of the trial, resulting in a cost-effectiveness ratio of £12,224 per quality-adjusted life year gained. Modelling suggested that cost-effectiveness would continue. CONCLUSIONS It is feasible to conduct a high-quality cluster randomised control trial of a complex intervention with multimorbid patients in primary care in areas of very high deprivation. Enhancing primary care through a whole-system approach may be a cost-effective way to protect quality of life for multimorbid patients in deprived areas. TRIAL REGISTRATION TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN 34092919 , assigned 14/1/2013.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stewart W Mercer
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, General Practice and Primary Care, University of Glasgow, 1 Horselethill Road, Glasgow, G12 9LX, UK.
| | - Bridie Fitzpatrick
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, General Practice and Primary Care, University of Glasgow, 1 Horselethill Road, Glasgow, G12 9LX, UK
| | - Bruce Guthrie
- Population Health Sciences Division, University of Dundee, Mackenzie Building, Kirsty Semple Way, Dundee, DD2 4BF, UK
| | - Elisabeth Fenwick
- Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, 1 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow, G12 8RZ, UK
| | - Eleanor Grieve
- Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, 1 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow, G12 8RZ, UK
| | - Kenny Lawson
- Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, 1 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow, G12 8RZ, UK
| | - Nicki Boyer
- Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, 1 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow, G12 8RZ, UK
| | - Alex McConnachie
- Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK
| | - Suzanne M Lloyd
- Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK
| | - Rosaleen O'Brien
- Institute of Applied Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, 4th Floor George Moore Building, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, Lanarkshire, G4 0BA, UK
| | - Graham C M Watt
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, General Practice and Primary Care, University of Glasgow, 1 Horselethill Road, Glasgow, G12 9LX, UK
| | - Sally Wyke
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, 27 Bute Gardens, Glasgow, G12 8RS, UK
| |
Collapse
|