Primary tumor location (right versus left side of the colon) and resection affect the survival of patients with liver metastases from colonic neuroendocrine carcinoma: a population-based study

Treatment indicators and prognostic factors in colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasms and adenocarcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation: a single center retrospective study

PURPOSE

This study compared survival and metastasis occurrence between colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasms (cNEN) and colorectal adenocarcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation (cNED) and further explored their prognostic factors and treatment indicators.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed as cNEN and cNED in West China Hospital from January 2009 to December 2020 were enrolled. The diagnosis and metastasis rates were calculated. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were conducted for progression-free survival (PFS) in cNEN surgical patients, and generalized linear regression was used for metastatic disease.

RESULT

The study enrolled 435 patients, including 257 neuroendocrine tumors (NET), 52 neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC), 29 mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNEN), and 97 NED patients, of whom 202 received local resection, and 233 received radical resection. Metastasis rates were higher in MiNEN and NEC groups compared to other groups (NED: 28.9%, MiNEN: 58.6%, NEC: 65.4%, NET: 8.6%, p < 0.001). The liver is the main metastatic site in cNEN, whereas cNED metastasized to various sites. For NEC and MiNEN patients, colon location (p = 0.002) and T stage > 2 (p = 0.040) were associated with disease progression separately. Independent risk factors for metastatic NET included tumor grade G2/G3 (p < 0.001), colon location (p = 0.001), size ≥ 1 cm (p = 0.005), and CK20 partial positive (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

cNEN show high metastatic capacity and are challenging to diagnose. More aggressive treatment and follow-up strategies are necessary for those patients. NET tumor grade higher than G2, size larger than 1 cm, or located in the colon should be managed with radical surgery.

Establishment and validation of a prognostic nomogram for patients with colorectal neuroendocrine carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Colorectal neuroendocrine carcinoma is a relatively rare tumor, for which a prognosis prediction model is lacking. Based on the data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and Fujian Cancer Hospital, the study constructed and validated a prognostic nomogram to assess overall survival of patients with colorectal neuroendocrine carcinoma(CRNEC).

METHODS

We extracted data of patients diagnosed with CRNEC from the SEER database. These patients were randomly divided into a training cohort(N = 1425) and an internal validation cohort(N = 612). Data of patients diagnosed with CRNEC in Fujian Cancer Hospital was collected as an external validation cohort(N = 54). A prognostic nomogram was established. The performance of the nomogram was assessed with ROC curve, C-index and calibration curve. Decision curve analysis(DCA) and ROC curve were used to compare the prediction efficacy of nomogram with the seventh edition of the TNM classification of the American Joint Commission of Cancer.

RESULTS

Nine variables were identified as independent predictors. Nomogram were established by the nine variables. AUC of the nomogram in predicting 1-, 3- and 5-year OS were 0.900, 0.912 and 0.915 in training cohort, 0.900, 0.925 and 0.919 in internal validation cohort, 0.900, 0.903 and 0.928 in external validation cohort. C-index were 0.845, 0.854 and 0.837. Calibration curves overlapped well with reference lines. Compared with the AJCC TNM staging system, the nomogram performed more effectively. Patients classified into low-risk and high-risk groups by the nomogram scores and performed well in stratification.

CONCLUSION

The prognostic nomogram established and validated in our study can accurately and effectively predict the prognosis of patients with CRNEC.

Surgical treatment of stage IV gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: Experience and outcomes in the United States

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Surgery for metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (GEP-NEC) has not been well-studied. This retrospective cohort study describes patients in the United States with stage IV GEP-NEC and their survival outcomes segregated by surgery.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with stage IV GEP-NEC from 2004 to 2017 in the National Cancer Database were categorized into three groups: no surgery, primary site or metastatic site ("single-site") surgery, and primary site and metastatic site ("multisite") surgery. Factors associated with surgical treatment were identified, and risk-adjusted overall survival of each group was compared.

RESULTS

Of 4171 patients included, 958 (23.0%) underwent single-site surgery and 374 (9.0%) underwent multisite surgery. The strongest predictor of surgery was primary tumor type. Compared with no surgery, the risk-adjusted mortality reduction associated with single-site surgery ranged from 63% for small bowel (HR = 0.37, 0.23-0.58, p < 0.001) NEC to 30% for colon and appendix NEC (HR = 0.70, 0.61-0.80, p < 0.001), while the mortality reduction associated with multisite surgery ranged from 77% for pancreas NEC (HR = 0.23, 0.17-0.33, p < 0.001) to 48% for colon and appendix NEC (HR = 0.52, 0.44-0.63, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We observed an association between extent of surgical intervention and overall survival for patients with stage IV GEP-NEC. Surgical resection should be further investigated as a treatment option for highly-selected patients with this aggressive disease.

The clinical and prognostic factors for biliary neuroendocrine neoplasm: a study based on the SEER database

BACKGROUND

In this study, we aimed at elucidating the postoperative survival and prognostic factors in patients with biliary neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN).

METHODS

Cases of biliary system NEN and adenocarcinoma from 1975 to 2016 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. A propensity score matching (PSM) method was used to adjust baseline differences in clinicopathological characteristics in our analysis. The Kaplan-Meier analysis was carried out for survival analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 233 patients with biliary system NEN were enrolled in this study, of which 119 patients' lesions located in gallbladder, while the others' located in bile duct. The postoperative overall survival of bile duct NEN is significantly longer than that of gallbladder NEN (P < 0.001). For gallbladder NENs, surgery method (P = 0.020) and lymph node metastasis (P = 0.018) were identified as independent prognostic factors. In terms of ampulla of vater (AOV) NENs, age (P = 0.017) and lymph node metastasis (P = 0.006) were identified as independent prognostic factors, while grade (P = 0.002) and lymph node metastasis (P = 0.036) were identified as independent prognostic factors for extrahepatic bile duct (EBD) NENs. PSM analysis indicated that patients with biliary duct NENs have a better postoperative prognosis than biliary duct adenocarcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with NEN have better overall survival than patients with adenocarcinoma. Gallbladder NEN has an adverse prognosis than that of biliary tract NEN. The pathological subtype, differentiation, lymph node metastasis, surgery method, and lymph node resection could affect the postoperative prognosis of the gallbladder and biliary tract NEN.