Bevacizumab in metastatic breast cancer: when may it be used?

Amelioration of breast cancer therapies through normalization of tumor vessels and microenvironment: paradigm shift to improve drug perfusion and nanocarrier permeation

Breast cancer (BC) is the most commonly diagnosed cancer among women. Chemo-, immune- and photothermal therapies are employed to manage BC. However, the tumor microenvironment (TME) prevents free drugs and nanocarriers (NCs) from entering the tumor premises. Formulation scientists rely on enhanced permeation and retention (EPR) to extravasate NCs in the TME. However, recent research has demonstrated the inconsistent nature of EPR among different patients and tumor types. In addition, angiogenesis, high intra-tumor fluid pressure, desmoplasia, and high cell and extracellular matrix density resist the accumulation of NCs in the TME. In this review, we discuss TME normalization as an approach to improve the penetration of drugs and NCSs in the tumor premises. Strategies such as normalization of tumor vessels, reversal of hypoxia, alleviation of high intra-tumor pressure, and infiltration of lymphocytes for the reversal of therapy failure have been discussed in this manuscript. Strategies to promote the infiltration of anticancer immune cells in the TME after vascular normalization have been discussed. Studies strategizing time points to administer TME-normalizing agents are highlighted. Mechanistic pathways controlling the angiogenesis and normalization processes are discussed along with the studies. This review will provide greater tumor-targeting insights to the formulation scientists.

The Role of Osteoprotegerin in Breast Cancer: Genetic Variations, Tumorigenic Pathways, and Therapeutic Potential

INTRODUCTION

Osteoprotegerin (OPG), encoded by the TNFRSF11B gene, is linked to the development of breast cancer via several pathways, including interactions with the receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB (RANK) ligands, apoptosis-inducing proteins like TRAIL, and genetic variations such as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), directly altering gene expression. This review aims to investigate the role of OPG expression in breast cancer.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed Medline, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect. Only full-text English publications from inception to September 2024 were included.

RESULTS

Studies have demonstrated that certain SNPs in the OPG gene, specifically rs3102735 and rs2073618, are linked to a higher risk of breast cancer development. Additionally, OPG's function as a TRAIL decoy receptor may inhibit the death of cancer cells. Furthermore, OPG in the serum and its interactions with BRCA mutations are being investigated for their potential influence on breast cancer progression. Studies have found that OPG promotes tumorigenesis by enhancing cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and aneuploidy in normal mammary epithelial cells. Moreover, OPG mediates the tumor-promoting effects of interleukin-1 beta and may serve as a biomarker for breast cancer risk, particularly in BRCA1 mutation carriers, through its role in dysregulated RANK signaling. Lastly, the use of recombinant OPG in mouse models has been found to exert anti-tumor effects.

CONCLUSIONS

In this review, the role of OPG in breast cancer is examined. OPG has a multifaceted role in breast cancer tumorigenesis and exerts its effects through genetic variations (SNPs), interactions with TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), and the modulation of the pro-tumorigenic microenvironment effects of angiogenesis, cell survival, and metastasis. Additionally, OPG's dual role as a tumor suppressor and promoter serves as a possible therapeutic target to enhance apoptosis, limit bone metastasis, and modulate the tumor microenvironment. Whilst much is now known, further studies are necessary to fully delineate the role of OPG.

Monoclonal antibodies in breast cancer: A critical appraisal

In breast cancer, mAbs can play multifunctional roles like targeting cancer cells, sometimes directly attacking them, helping in locating and delivering therapeutic drugs to targets, inhibiting cell growth and blocking immune system inhibitors, etc. Monoclonal antibodies are also one of the important successful treatment strategies especially against HER2 but they have not been explored much for other types of breast cancers especially in triple negative breast cancers. Monoclonal antibodies impact the feasibility of antigen specificity, bispecific and trispecific mAbs have opened new doors for more targeted specific efficacy. Monoclonal antibodies can be used diversly and with efficacy as compared to other methods of treatment thus maining it a suitable candidate for breast cancer treatment. However, mAbs treatment also causes various side effects such as fever, trembling, fatigue, headache and muscle pain, nausea/vomiting, difficulty in breathing, rashes and bleeding. Understanding the pros and cons of this strategy, we have explored in this review, the current and future potential capabilities of monoclonal antibodies with respect to diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. DATA AVAILABILITY: Not applicable.

Non-conventional and Investigational PET Radiotracers for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review

Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancies in women, with high morbidity and mortality rates. In breast cancer, the use of novel radiopharmaceuticals in nuclear medicine can improve the accuracy of diagnosis and staging, refine surveillance strategies and accuracy in choosing personalized treatment approaches, including radioligand therapy. Nuclear medicine thus shows great promise for improving the quality of life of breast cancer patients by allowing non-invasive assessment of the diverse and complex biological processes underlying the development of breast cancer and its evolution under therapy. This review aims to describe molecular probes currently in clinical use as well as those under investigation holding great promise for personalized medicine and precision oncology in breast cancer.

A Phase Ib multicenter, dose-escalation study of the polyamine analogue PG-11047 in combination with gemcitabine, docetaxel, bevacizumab, erlotinib, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, or sunitinib in patients with advanced solid tumors or lymphoma

PURPOSE

Polyamines are absolutely essential for maintaining tumor cell proliferation. PG-11047, a polyamine analogue, is a nonfunctional competitor of the natural polyamine spermine that has demonstrated anticancer activity in cells and animal models of multiple cancer types. Preclinical investigations into the effects of common chemotherapeutic agents have revealed overlap with components of the polyamine metabolic pathway also affected by PG-11047. This report describes a Phase Ib clinical trial investigating PG-11047 in combination with cytotoxic and anti-angiogenic chemotherapeutic agents in patients with advanced refractory metastatic solid tumors or lymphoma.

METHODS

A total of 172 patients were assigned to treatment arms based on cancer type to receive the appropriate standard-of-care therapy (gemcitabine, docetaxel, bevacizumab, erlotinib, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), or sunitinib as directed) along with once weekly intravenous infusions of PG-11047. PG-11047 dose escalation ranged from 50 to 590 mg.

RESULTS

The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of PG-11047 in combination with bevacizumab, erlotinib, cisplatin, and 5-FU was 590 mg. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in these groups were rare (5 of 148 patients). Overall partial responses (PR) were observed in 12% of patients treated with PG-11047 and bevacizumab, with stable disease documented in an additional 40%. Stable disease occurred in 71.4% of patients in the 5-FU arm, 54.1% in the cisplatin arm, and 33.3% in the erlotinib arm. Four of the patients receiving cisplatin + PG-11047 (20%) had unconfirmed PRs. MTDs for gemcitabine, docetaxel, and sunitinib could not be determined due to DLTs at low doses of PG-11047 and small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of this Phase Ib trial indicate that PG-11047 can be safely administered to patients in combination with bevacizumab, erlotinib, cisplatin, and 5-FU on the once weekly dosing schedule described and may provide therapeutic benefit. The manageable toxicity profile and high MTD determination provide a safety profile for further clinical studies.

Zebrafish xenografts as a fast screening platform for bevacizumab cancer therapy

Despite promising preclinical results, average response rates to anti-VEGF therapies, such as bevacizumab, are reduced for most cancers, while incurring in remarkable costs and side effects. Currently, there are no biomarkers available to select patients that can benefit from this therapy. Depending on the individual tumor, anti-VEGF therapies can either block or promote metastasis. In this context, an assay able to predict individual responses prior to treatment, including the impact on metastasis would prove of great value to guide treatment options. Here we show that zebrafish xenografts are able to reveal different responses to bevacizumab in just 4 days, evaluating not only individual tumor responses but also the impact on angiogenesis and micrometastasis. Importantly, we perform proof-of-concept experiments where clinical responses in patients were compared with their matching zebrafish Patient-Derived Xenografts - zAvatars, opening the possibility of using the zebrafish model to screen bevacizumab therapy in a personalized manner.

Rebelo de Almeida et al. describe the application of zebrafish tumor xenografts (zAvatars) to analyse the efficacy of bevacizumab (FDA approved drug) to treat cancer patients with highly variable outcomes. The authors suggest that these zAvatars could be used as a predictive model to determine whether or not bevacizumab treatment would be efficient for individual patients.

A new immunotherapy schedule in addition to first-line hormone therapy for metastatic breast cancer patients in a state of clinical benefit during hormone therapy

Acquired resistance occurs in metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients. The addition of interferon beta/interleukin-2 immunotherapy to first-line salvage hormone therapy (HT) prolonged progression-free (PFS) and overall survivals (OS) in 26 patients, as compared with 30 historical controls and literature data. This was a 2 : 1 ratio case-control retrospective observational study. The cases were from an open pilot study, started in 1992, and controls were recruited in 2006. The planned mean follow-up time was the time at which more than 80% of controls progressed. The median PFS was significantly longer in the cases than that in controls, 33.1 (95% CI 24.5-41.8) vs 18 (95% CI 12.1-23.8) months (p < 0.0001). Also, median OS was significantly longer in the cases, 81 vs 62 (95% CI 48.1-75.9) months (p < 0.0029). When analysis of the 2 groups was adjusted for the disease-free interval (DFI), hormone receptor status, HER2, site of metastases and molecular-targeted therapies, the hazard ratio for PFS and for OS in the cases increased from 2.347 to 3.090 and from 1.874 to 2.147, respectively. This occurred in spite of the higher proportion of controls (82% vs 7.1%) treated with aromatase inhibitors (AIs), while selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) were given to 92.9% of the cases and to 18% of the control group (p < 0.0001). Immunotherapy significantly prolonged PFS and OS during conventional first-line HT. A multi-centre randomised clinical trial is advised to enter this immunotherapy into clinical practice. KEY MESSAGES: • Acquired resistance occurs in metastatic endocrine-dependent breast cancer patients. • Interferon beta-interleukin-2 immunotherapy added to first-line salvage hormone therapy prolonged progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survivals in 26 patients of a pilot study as compared with 30 historical controls. • In this 2:1 ratio case-control prospective observational study, the PFS median time was significantly longer in the study group than that in controls, 33.1 (95% CI 24.5-41.8) vs 18 (95% CI 12.1-23.8) months (p < 0.0001). • Also, the OS median time was significantly longer in the study group, 81 vs 62 (95% CI 48.1-75.9) months (p < 0.0029).

Inhibition of VEGF and Angiopoietin-2 to Reduce Brain Metastases of Breast Cancer Burden

For metastases in the central nervous system, angiogenesis enhances metastatic potential and promotes progression. Primary factors which drive vessel growth are vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and angiopoietin-2. Preclinical models show inhibition of either factor reduces metastases spread and inhibits growth. This work sets out to answer two questions in a preclinical mouse model. First, whether the combined inhibition of VEGF and angiopoietin-2, reduces passive permeability and limits drug uptake into brain metastases; and second, whether this inhibition reduces metastases burden in brain. We observed combinatorial inhibition of VEGF and angiopoietin-2, decreased (p < 0.05) angiogenesis and vascular branching in an aortic ring assay and decreased (p < 0.05) endothelial wound closure times. Using a brain metastases of breast cancer model (induced by intracardiac injections of brain seeking MDA-MB-231Br cells or 4T1Br cells), we observed, similar to VEGF, angiopoetin-2 expression correlates to increased angiogenesis (p < 0.05) and increased lesion permeability. To determine efficacy, animals were administered bevacizumab plus L1-10 (angiopoietin inhibitor) twice per week until neurological symptoms developed. Lesion permeability significantly decreased by ∼50% (p < 0.05) compared to untreated lesions, but remained ∼25% greater (p < 0.0%) than brain. In subsequent experiments, animals were administered similar regimens but sacrificed on day 32. The number of metastatic lesions developed was significantly (p < 0.001) reduced in the bevacizumab group (56%) and combination group (86%). Lesions’ size was reduced in bevacizumab treated lesions (∼67%) and bevacizumab and L1-10 treated lesions (∼78%) developing area < 0.5 mm². In summary, combinatorial inhibition of VEGF and angiopoietin reduces lesion permeability and brain metastatic burden.

Anti-angiogenesis therapy and gap junction inhibition reduce MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell invasion and metastasis in vitro and in vivo

Cancer cells secrete VEGF, which plays a key role in their growth, invasion, extravasation and metastasis. Direct cancer cell-endothelial cell interaction, mediated by gap junctions, is of critical importance in the extravasation process. In this study, we evaluated avastin (Av), an anti-VEGF antibody; and oleamide (OL), a gap junction inhibitor, using MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells in vitro and a xenograft murine model in vivo. Results showed that Av/OL significantly decreased proliferation, induced cell cycle arrest and decreased migration and invasion of MDA-MB-231 cells in vitro. In addition, Av/OL significantly decreased homo and hetero-cellular communication interaction between MDA-MDA and MDA-endothelial cells, respectively. The expression levels of several factors including VEGF, HIF1α, CXCR4, Cx26, Cx43, and MMP9 were attenuated upon Av/OL treatment in vitro. On the other hand, avastin, but not oleamide, reduced tumor size of NSG mice injected subdermally (s.d.) with MDA-MB-231 cells, which was also associated with increased survival. Furthermore, Av but also OL, separately, significantly increased the survival rate, and reduced pulmonary and hepatic metastatic foci, of intravenously (i.v.) injected mice. Finally, OL reduced MMP9 protein expression levels, better than Av and in comparisons to control, in the lungs of MDA-MB-231 i.v. injected NSG mice. In conclusion, while avastin has anti-angiogenic, anti-tumor and anti-metastatic activities, oleamide has anti-metastatic activity, presumably at the extravasation level, providing further evidence for the role of gap junction intercellular communication (GJIC) in cancer cell extravasation.

In vitro the behaviors of metastasis with suppression of VEGF in human bone metastatic LNCaP-derivative C4-2B prostate cancer cell line

BACKGROUND

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a signal protein produced by cells that stimulates vasculogenesis and angiogenesis. VEGF is believed to implicate poor prognosis in various cancers. The overexpression of VEGF may be an early step in the process of metastasis.

METHODS

ELISA was used to investigate the levels of VEGF, bFGF and IL8 in human bone metastatic LNCaP-derivative C4-2B prostate cancer cell line and its parental cell line, LNCaP and to determine the effect of bevacizumab on reducing the level of VEGF. Cell proliferation assay, invasion assay and in vitro angiogenesis assay were performed under the condition with bevacizumab or control IgG.

RESULTS

Human bone metastatic LNCaP-derivative C4-2B prostate cancer cell line expressed a higher level of VEGF than its parental primary prostate cancer cell line LNCaP. The effect of bevacizumab is dose-dependent and time-dependent: 100 μg/mL of bevacizumab and 3-day treatment was more effective than low-dose and lesser-day treatment for decreasing the level of VEGF. Bevacizumab is able to suppress cell proliferation, angiogenesis and invasion in human bone metastatic C4-2B prostatic cancer cell line.

CONCLUSIONS

The overexpression of VEGF can be inhibited by bevacizumab in human bone metastatic cancer cell line. The behaviors of metastasis involving proliferation, angiogenesis and invasion are suppressed by anti-VEGF therapy.

Recent advances in the application of antibodies as therapeutics

The application of antibodies as therapeutic agents in the treatment of cancer now represents a significant proportion of the oncology drug arena. Despite this success, the ability to engineer and exploit antibodies in many different formats is ensuring that new avenues for their therapeutic application are constantly being examined. This review examines a selection of novel antibody-based therapeutic strategies that are currently in late preclinical and clinical evaluation.