Hormonal treatment combined with targeted therapies in endocrine-responsive and HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer

Low progesterone receptor levels in high-grade DCIS correlate with HER2 upregulation and the presence of invasive components

Objective

In this study, we investigated pivotal molecular markers in human high-grade breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Expression status of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER2) was measured among various subtypes (Luminal (Lum) A, LumB HER2-, LumB HER2+, HER2-enriched and triple-negative).

Methods

In total, 357 DCIS cases were classified into respective subtypes, according to the 2013 St. Gallen guidelines. Each subtype was categorized into three subcategories: "Pure" (those without an invasive component), "W/invasive" (those with an invasive component), and "All" (the entire group of the given subtype). ER and PR expression were registered as intervals. Equivocal HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) cases (2+) were further investigated using dual-color in situ hybridization.

Results

The majority of patients (71%) were over the age of 50. We discovered no significant differences in the proportion of age between the "Pure" and "W/invasive" groups. There was no significant difference in ER/PR expression between "Pure" luminal subtypes of DCIS and "W/invasive" cases. We compared the HER2 IHC scores of "0", "1+", and "2+" among LumA and LumB HER2 subtypes and identified no statistically significant differences between "Pure" and "W/invasive" (p = 0.603). ER and PR expression ≥ 50% cutoff value was present in > 90% of all LumA cases. The incidences of cases with ER expression at cutoff values of < 10% and ≥ 50% in LumA were significantly different compared to other luminal subtypes (p < 0.0001). The proportion of cases with PR expression < 20% showed significant differences in the various luminal subtypes. In luminal B subtypes, low PR expression (< 20%) was significantly associated with both strong HER2 expression (3+) and the presence of an invasive component (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0365, respectively).

Conclusions

ER and PR expression at ≥ 50% cutoff values were found in more than 90% of LumA cases. Samples with ER < 10% and ≥ 50% in LumA were significantly different compared to other luminal subtypes (p < 0.0001). Low PR expression in high-grade DCIS was strongly associated with HER2 overexpression (3+) and an invasive component (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0365, respectively).

heredERA Breast Cancer: a phase III, randomized, open-label study evaluating the efficacy and safety of giredestrant plus the fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection in patients with previously untreated HER2-positive, estrogen receptor-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

HER2-positive, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer (HER2+, ER+ BC) is a distinct disease subtype associated with inferior response to chemotherapy plus HER2-targeted therapy compared with HER2+, ER-negative BC. Bi-directional crosstalk leads to cooperation of the HER2 and ER pathways that may drive treatment resistance; thus, simultaneous co-targeting may optimize treatment impact and survival outcomes in patients with HER2+, ER+ BC. First-line (1L) treatment for patients with HER2+ metastatic BC (mBC) is pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and taxane chemotherapy. In clinical practice, dual HER2 blockade plus a fixed number of chemotherapy cycles are given as induction therapy to maximize tumor response, with subsequent HER2-targeted maintenance treatment given as a more tolerable regimen for long-term disease control. For patients whose tumors co-express ER, maintenance endocrine therapy (ET) can be added, but uptake varies due to lack of data from randomized clinical trials investigating the superiority of maintenance ET plus dual HER2 blockade versus dual HER2 blockade alone. Giredestrant, a novel oral selective ER antagonist and degrader, shows promising clinical activity and manageable safety across phase I-II trials of patients with ER+, HER2-negative BC, with therapeutic potential in those with HER2 co-expression.

METHODS

This phase III, randomized, open-label, two-arm study aims to recruit 812 patients with HER2+, ER+  locally advanced (LA)/mBC into the induction phase (fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection [PH FDC SC] plus a taxane) to enable 730 patients to be randomized 1:1 to the maintenance phase (giredestrant plus PH FDC SC or PH FDC SC [plus optional ET]), stratified by disease site (visceral versus non-visceral), type of LA/metastatic presentation (de novo versus recurrent), best overall response to induction therapy (partial/complete response versus stable disease), and intent to give ET (yes versus no). The primary endpoint is investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, objective response rate, clinical benefit rate, duration of response, safety, and patient-reported outcomes.

DISCUSSION

heredERA BC will address whether giredestrant plus dual HER2 blockade is superior to dual HER2 blockade alone, to inform the use of this combination in clinical practice for maintenance 1L treatment of patients with HER2+, ER+ LA/mBC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05296798; registered on March 25, 2022. Protocol version 3.0 (November 18, 2022).

SPONSOR

F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Grenzacherstrasse 124 4070, Basel, Switzerland.

Identifying the optimal therapeutics for patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-positive advanced breast cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer is a distinct subtype with different prognosis and response to treatment. HER2-targeted therapy is currently recommended for patients with HR+/HER2+ advanced breast cancer. However, there is debate over which drugs to add on the basis of HER2 blockade yield the optimal efficacy. This systematic review and network meta-analysis was conducted to solve the problem.

METHODS

Eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different interventions in HR+/HER2+ metastatic breast cancer were included. The outcomes of interest included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Pooled hazard ratios or odds ratios with credible intervals (CrIs) were calculated to estimate the predefined outcomes. The optimal therapeutics were identified by comparing the surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA).

RESULTS

Totally, 23 literatures of 20 RCTs were included. Regarding PFS, significant differences were detected between single or dual HER2 blockade plus endocrine therapy (ET) versus ET alone and dual HER2 blockade plus ET versus physician's choice. Trastuzumab, pertuzumab plus chemotherapy significantly improved PFS than trastuzumab plus chemotherapy (hazard ratio 0.69, 95% CrI 0.50-0.92). The SUCRA values suggested the relatively better efficacy of dual HER2-targeted therapy plus ET (86%-91%) than chemotherapy (62%-81%) in prolonging PFS and OS. The HER2 blockade-containing regimens showed similar safety profiles in eight documented TRAEs.

CONCLUSIONS

Prominent status of dual-targeted therapy for patients with HR+/HER2+ metastatic breast cancer was revealed. Compared with chemotherapy-containing regimens, the ET-containing ones showed better efficacy and similar safety profiles, which could be recommended in clinical practice.

Emerging Targeted Therapies for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women and the leading cause of death. HER2 overexpression is found in approximately 20% of breast cancers and is associated with a poor prognosis and a shorter overall survival. Tratuzumab, a monoclonal antibody directed against the HER2 receptor, is the standard of care treatment. However, a third of the patients do not respond to therapy. Given the high rate of resistance, other HER2-targeted strategies have been developed, including monoclonal antibodies such as pertuzumab and margetuximab, trastuzumab-based antibody drug conjugates such as trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) and trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-DXd), and tyrosine kinase inhibitors like lapatinib and tucatinib, among others. Moreover, T-DXd has proven to be of use in the HER2-low subtype, which suggests that other HER2-targeted therapies could be successful in this recently defined new breast cancer subclassification. When patients progress to multiple strategies, there are several HER2-targeted therapies available; however, treatment options are limited, and the potential combination with other drugs, immune checkpoint inhibitors, CAR-T cells, CAR-NK, CAR-M, and vaccines is an interesting and appealing field that is still in development. In this review, we will discuss the highlights and pitfalls of the different HER2-targeted therapies and potential combinations to overcome metastatic disease and resistance to therapy.

The race to develop oral SERDs and other novel estrogen receptor inhibitors: recent clinical trial results and impact on treatment options

Hormonal therapy plays a vital part in the treatment of estrogen receptor-positive (ER +) breast cancer. ER can be activated in a ligand-dependent and independent manner. Currently available ER-targeting agents include selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs), and aromatase inhibitors (AIs). Estrogen receptor mutation (ESR1 mutation) is one of the common mechanisms by which breast cancer becomes resistant to additional therapies from SERMs or AIs. These tumors remain sensitive to SERDs such as fulvestrant. Fulvestrant is limited in clinical utilization by its intramuscular formulation and once-monthly injection in large volumes. Oral SERDs are being rapidly developed to replace fulvestrant with the potential of higher efficacy and lower toxicities. Elacestrant is the first oral SERD that went through a randomized phase III trial showing increased efficacy, especially in tumors bearing ESR1 mutation, and good tolerability. Two other oral SERDs recently failed to achieve the primary endpoints of longer progression-free survival (PFS). They targeted tumors previously treated with several lines of prior therapies untested for ESR1 mutation. Initial clinical trial data demonstrated that tumors without the ESR1 mutation are less likely to benefit from the SERDs and may still respond to SERMs or AIs, including tumors previously exposed to hormonal therapy. Testing for ESR1 mutation in ongoing clinical trials and in hormonal therapy for breast cancer is highly recommended. Novel protein degradation technologies such as proteolysis-targeting chimera (PROTACS), molecular glue degrader (MGD), and lysosome-targeting chimeras (LYTACS) may result in more efficient ER degradation, while ribonuclease-targeting chimeras (RIBOTAC) and small interfering RNA (siRNA) may inhibit the production of ER protein.

Association of Endocrine Therapy for HR+/ERBB2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer With Survival Outcomes

IMPORTANCE

Evidence suggests that patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (ERBB2+ [formerly HER2+]) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) have different clinical characteristics and outcomes according to their hormone receptor (HR) status. The place of endocrine therapy (ET) for patients with HR+/ERBB2+ is still not clearly defined in this setting.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association of HR status and first-line inclusion of ET with outcomes among patients with ERBB2+ MBC.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cohort study was an analysis of clinical data from the French clinical Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) cohort, including patients with MBC who started treatment between 2008 and 2017. The last date of follow-up was June 18, 2020. Data were analyzed from May 2021 to May 2022.

EXPOSURES

Patients were treated with first-line ERBB2-targeted therapy and either chemotherapy (CT) with or without ET or ET alone. For the study of the association of maintenance ET with outcomes, we included patients treated with first-line ERBB2-targeted therapy with CT and with or without maintenance ET.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Median overall survival (OS) and median first-line progression-free survival (PFS) were reported using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards models and a propensity score were constructed to report and adjust for prognostic factors. Multivariable analysis included age at MBC, time to MBC, number of metastatic sites, type of metastases, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status.

RESULTS

Among 4145 women with ERBB2+ MBC, 2696 patients had HR+ (median [IQR] age, 58.0 [47.0-67.0] years) and 1449 patients had HR- (56.0 [47.0-64.0] years) tumors. The median OS for patients with HR+ vs HR- tumors was 55.9 months (95% CI, 53.7-59.4 months) vs 42.0 months (95% CI, 38.8-45.2 months), confirmed in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.26-1.56; P < .001). The median PFS for patients with HR+ vs HR- tumors was 12.2 months (95% CI, 11.5-12.9 months) vs 9.8 months (95% CI, 9.2-11.0 months; P = .01), and the HR was 1.15 (95% CI, 1.06-1.26; P < .001). In multivariable analysis, no significant difference was found in OS or PFS for 1520 patients treated with ERBB2-targeted therapy with CT and with or without ET vs 203 patients receiving ERBB2-targeted therapy with ET, regardless of type of ERBB2-targeted therapy (trastuzumab or trastuzumab with pertuzumab). This result was confirmed by matching patients using a propensity score. Using the time-dependent ET variable among patients with ERBB2-targeted therapy with CT, those with maintenance ET had significantly better PFS (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.60-0.82; P < .001) and OS (hazard ratio, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.39-0.57; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

These results suggest that ET-containing first-line regimens may be associated with benefits among a subgroup of patients with HR+/ERBB2+ MBC.

Activity of Estrogen Receptor β Agonists in Therapy-Resistant Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer

Background

Among women, breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Estrogen receptor α-positive (ERα+) breast cancer accounts for 70% of all breast cancer subtypes. Although ERα+ breast cancer initially responds to estrogen deprivation or blockade, the emergence of resistance compels the use of more aggressive therapies. While ERα is a driver in ERα+ breast cancer, ERβ plays an inhibitory role in several different cancer types. To date, the lack of highly selective ERβ agonists without ERα activity has limited the exploration of ERβ activation as a strategy for ERα+ breast cancer.

Methods

We measured the expression levels of ESR1 and ESR2 genes in immortalized mammary epithelial cells and different breast cancer cell lines. The viability of ERα+ breast cancer cell lines upon treatments with specific ERβ agonists, including OSU-ERb-12 and LY500307, was assessed. The specificity of the ERβ agonists, OSU-ERb-12 and LY500307, was confirmed by reporter assays. The effects of ERβ agonists on cell proliferation, cell cycle, apoptosis, colony formation, cell migration, and expression of tumor suppressor proteins were analyzed. The expression of ESR2 and genes containing ERE-AP1 composite response elements was examined in ERα+ human breast cancer samples to determine the correlation between ESR2 expression and overall survival and that of putative ESR2-regulated genes.

Results

In this study, we demonstrate the efficacy of highly selective ERβ agonists in ERα+ breast cancer cell lines and drug-resistant derivatives. ERβ agonists blocked cell proliferation, migration, and colony formation and induced apoptosis and S and/or G2/M cell-cycle arrest of ERα+ breast cancer cell lines. Also, increases in the expression of the key tumor suppressors FOXO1 and FOXO3a were noted. Importantly, the strong synergy between ERβ agonists and ERα antagonists suggested that the efficacy of ERβ agonists is maximized by combination with ERα blockade. Lastly, ESR2 (ERβ gene) expression was negatively correlated with ESR1 (ERα gene) and CCND1 RNA expression in human metastatic ERα+/HER2- breast cancer samples.

Conclusion

Our results demonstrate that highly selective ERβ agonists attenuate the viability of ERα+ breast cancer cell lines in vitro and suggest that this therapeutic strategy merits further evaluation for ERα+ breast cancer.

Trastuzumab Plus Endocrine Therapy or Chemotherapy as First-line Treatment for Patients with Hormone Receptor-Positive and HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer (SYSUCC-002)

PURPOSE

There is no research evidence demonstrate which is the better partner strategy, endocrine therapy or chemotherapy, to combine with anti-HER2 therapy as the first-line management of hormone receptor (HR)-positive (HR+) and HER2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We wished to ascertain if trastuzumab plus endocrine therapy is noninferior to trastuzumab plus chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted an open-label, noninferiority, phase III, randomized, controlled trial (NCT01950182) at nine hospitals in China. Participants, stratified by previous adjuvant endocrine therapy and disease status (recurrent disease vs. de novo metastasis), were assigned randomly (1:1) to receive trastuzumab plus endocrine therapy (per investigator's choice of oestrogen-receptor modulators or aromatase inhibitor, with/without concurrent ovarian suppression) or chemotherapy (per investigator's choice of taxanes, capecitabine, or vinorelbine). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) with a noninferiority upper margin of 1.35 for the HR. The intention-to-treat population was used in primary and safety analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 392 patients were enrolled and assigned randomly to receive trastuzumab plus endocrine therapy (ET group, n = 196) or trastuzumab plus chemotherapy (CT group, n = 196). After a median follow-up of 30.2 months [interquartile range (IQR) 15.0-44.7], the median PFS was 19.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 16.7-21.7)] in the ET group and 14.8 months (12.8-16.8) in the CT group (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.71-1.09; Pnoninferiority < 0.0001). A significantly higher prevalence of toxicity was observed in the CT group compared with the ET group.

CONCLUSIONS

Trastuzumab plus endocrine therapy was noninferior to trastuzumab plus chemotherapy in patients with HR+HER2+ MBC.

Efficacy and Safety of Anti-HER2 Agents in Combination With Chemotherapy for Metastatic HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Patient: A Network Meta-Analysis

Background

The presence of anti-HER2 agents, such as trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), significantly improved the prognosis of metastatic HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancers (BC). However, drug resistance and disease progression are still common. In order to further improve the treatment efficacy, new clinical trials about anti-HER2 agents in combination with chemotherapy are growing rapidly. We conducted the network meta-analysis to synthesize evidences of clinical trials to identify the best therapy for metastatic HER2+ BC.

Methods

A systematic search of randomized controlled trials regarding anti-HER2 agents in combination with chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic breast cancers up to May 2020 was conducted in Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted to synthesize the results and rank the therapies.

Results

Twenty-six studies, including 16 studies for first-line treatments and 10 studies for second- or later-line treatments were included in the network meta-analysis. For first-line studies, the THP (taxanes + trastuzumab + pertuzumab) regimen exhibited the highest probability to be the optimal treatment in all efficacy outcomes and moderate safety. For second- or later-line studies, the T-DM1 and XHTuC (capecitabine + trastuzumab + tucatinib) regimens ranked top two in all efficacy outcomes according to the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) results. T-DM1 ranked first in PFS and OS whereas XHTuC ranked first in ORR. The safety outcomes of T-DM1 and XHTuC were acceptable.

Conclusions

THP was still the optimal first-line treatment for metastatic HER2+ BC. T-DM1 and XHTuC were recommended for second-line treatments.

Systematic Review Registration

INPLASY.com, identifier (INPLASY202090086).

CDK4/6 and PI3K inhibitors: A new promise for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer

BACKGROUND

HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer represents a heterogeneous breast cancer subtype, including both oestrogen receptor (ER) positive and negative tumours. A deeper understanding of the crosstalk between ER and HER2 receptor pathways has led to the development of treatment strategies consisting of a simultaneous blockade of both signalling pathways, as a reasonable approach to prevent the onset of mechanisms of resistance.

METHODS

This review was based on the material searched on PubMed, MEDLINE and Embase databases and on conference proceedings from major oncology conferences up to 15 December 2020. The search strategy included the following keywords: 'HER2-positive breast cancer', 'CDK4-6 inhibitors' and 'PI3K inhibitors', and was adapted for use with different bibliographic databases.

RESULTS

CDK4/6 and PI3K inhibitors are two classes of agents already approved in patients with hormone receptor positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. Recently, promising data with their use have been also shown in HER2+ disease. Results from preclinical and clinical studies are shedding light on the role of these classes of agents in HER2+ breast cancer, and are paving the road for a forthcoming change in clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment landscape for HER2+ breast cancer is rapidly changing, and CDK4/6 and PI3K inhibitors represent a new promising strategy to improve patients' outcomes.

The changing treatment of metastatic her2-positive breast cancer

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-overexpressing breast cancer has been historically associated with an aggressive disease course with common distant metastasis and poor prognosis. HER2-targeting therapies have significantly changed treatment and drastically improved outcomes for this group of patients. However, primary or acquired resistance to anti-HER2 regimens leads almost universally to disease progression, often with difficult to treat central nervous system (CNS) metastases. The current review summarized the existing therapeutic options for HER2-positive metastatic disease in the first, second and further line setting. Furthermore, novel agents currently under development were presented, which have demonstrated encouraging results in heavily pretreated patients or specific subgroups, such as HR-positive/HER2-positive tumors and CNS disease.

Predictive significance of HER2 intratumoral heterogeneity, determined by simultaneous gene and protein analysis, for resistance to trastuzumab-based treatments for HER2-positive breast cancer

Gene-protein assay (GPA), a combination of immunohistochemistry and dual in situ hybridization, allows simultaneous visualization of HER2 protein and gene on a single slide. We aimed to clarify the clinical significance of HER2 intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) using GPA. We investigated the relationships between various HER2 ITH indicators and clinical course in 102 patients with HER2-positive breast cancer, treated with neoadjuvant trastuzumab and chemotherapy. Five representative microscopic images were captured from each GPA slide of pre-therapeutic biopsy materials. All evaluable cancer cells in the images were individually assessed for HER2 gene copy number and protein expression. Mean and coefficient of variation (CV) of both gene copy number and protein category were calculated, and each was divided into negative, equivocal, and positive. Based on their combined status, cancer cells were classified into nine types. Pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant treatments showed positive relationships to mean gene copy number (P < 0.001), mean protein category (P < 0.001), and proportion of gene- and protein-positive tumor cells (P < 0.001) and showed negative relationships to the CV of protein category (P < 0.001) and the proportion of gene-amplified but protein-negative tumor cells (P = 0.002). Two diagnostic models, created by combining clinicopathological factors and ITH indicators, showed excellent potential diagnostic ability for pCR (mean gene copy number and protein category CV; AUC = 0.837, proportion of gene- and protein-positive tumor cells; AUC = 0.831). HER2 ITH quantified by GPA is a potential predictive indicator for efficacy of HER2-targeted treatment.

Third-line treatment of HER2-positive advanced breast cancer: From no standard to a Pandora's box

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2+) advanced breast cancer (ABC) accounts for about 15-20% of all ABC cases. Large randomized trials have determined the standard first- and second-line treatments for this subgroup of patients, namely dual blockade plus chemotherapy and TDM1. However, no standard treatment is specifically recommended after TDM1, and most of the subsequent therapeutic choices commonly rely on old trials not optimally reflecting the current patient population. The recent FDA-approval of three novel anti-HER2 compounds is revolutionizing the field. In particular, trastuzumab deruxtecan was approved after showing unprecedented activity in a phase 2 trial for highly pretreated HER2+ ABC patients; tucatinib and neratinib were approved based on the results of the randomized HER2CLIMB and NALA trial, respectively. With an increasing arsenal of treatment options, clinical decision-making will need to take into account a variety of aspects, including differences in clinical trial designs, outcomes and toxicity profile of each drug, patient's characteristics and preferences.