A comparison of clinical examination and ultrasound enthesitis indices in patients with psoriatic arthritis, adjusted for concomitant fibromyalgia

DEUS Enthesitis Index (DEI): a new tool integrating ultrasound and clinical examination for enthesitis assessment in spondyloarthritis

OBJECTIVES

(1) To develop a composite score, the DEUS (Defining Enthesitis on Ultrasound in Spondyloarthritis) Enthesitis Index (DEI), which integrates ultrasound and clinical examination findings for enthesitis assessment in patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA); (2) to examine the relationships between DEI and clinical features in this population, compared to the clinical examination of the entheses alone.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional, observational, multicentric study involving 20 rheumatology centres across 11 countries. Ultrasound and clinical examinations were performed bilaterally on the lower limb large entheses (ie, quadriceps tendon, proximal and distal patellar tendons, Achilles tendon and plantar fascia) in 413 patients with SpA, including 224 patients with axial SpA and 189 patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). A score of 1.0 for clinical enthesitis and 1.0 for ultrasound enthesitis was assigned for each of the 10 entheses evaluated. The total DEI score, which combines clinical and ultrasound findings, ranged from 0 to 20 per patient. Logistic and gamma regression models based on DEI were compared with those derived solely from clinical enthesitis assessment to evaluate their relative performance in explaining disease-related outcomes.

RESULTS

Among patients with SpA, the median DEI was 1.0 (IQR 0.0-3.0). DEI showed significant associations with SpA disease activity and severity indices in regression analyses, except for the Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis score in patients with PsA. Compared with the clinical examination alone of the same entheses, DEI models exhibited a significantly better fit with C-reactive protein levels and ultrasound-detected structural damage at the enthesis (ie, enthesophytes and bone erosions). By contrast, the clinical examination alone models showed a significantly stronger fit with SpA disease activity indices and patient-reported outcomes compared with the DEI.

CONCLUSIONS

DEI is a novel tool that integrates both ultrasound and clinical examination findings for enthesitis assessment, potentially ensuring a more reliable evaluation of this key domain in SpA.

Relationship Between Ultrasound and Physical Examination in the Assessment of Enthesitis in Patients With Spondyloarthritis: Results From the DEUS Multicenter Study

OBJECTIVE

The study objectives were (i) to explore the agreement between the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) ultrasound lesions of enthesitis and physical examination in assessing enthesitis in patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) and (ii) to investigate the prevalence and clinical relevance of subclinical enthesitis in this population.

METHODS

Twenty rheumatology centers participated in this cross-sectional study. Patients with SpA, including axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), underwent both ultrasound scan and physical examination of large lower limb entheses. The OMERACT ultrasound lesions of enthesitis were considered, along with a recently proposed definition for "active enthesitis" by our group. Subclinical enthesitis was defined as the presence of "active enthesitis" in ≥1 enthesis in patients with SpA without clinical enthesitis (ie, number of positive entheses on physical examination and Leeds Enthesitis Index score = 0).

RESULTS

A total of 4,130 entheses in 413 patients with SpA (224 with axSpA and 189 with PsA) were evaluated through ultrasound and physical examination. Agreement between ultrasound and physical examination ranged from moderate (ie, enthesophytes) to almost perfect (ie, power Doppler and "active enthesitis"). Patellar tendon entheses demonstrated the highest agreement, whereas Achilles tendon insertion showed the lowest. Among 158 (38.3%) of 413 patients with SpA with clinical enthesitis, 108 (68.4%) exhibited no "active enthesitis" on ultrasound. Conversely, of those 255 without clinical enthesitis, 39 (15.3%) showed subclinical enthesitis. Subclinical enthesitis was strongly associated with local structural damage. However, no differences were observed regarding the demographic and clinical profiles of patients with SpA with and without subclinical enthesitis.

CONCLUSION

Our study underscores the need for a comprehensive tool integrating ultrasound and physical examination for assessing enthesitis in patients with SpA.

Effects of TNF-α inhibition versus secukinumab on active ultrasound-confirmed enthesitis in psoriatic arthritis

Introduction

Enthesitis is a hallmark of psoriatic disease, but its clinical assessment is problematic in terms of diagnostic sensitivity and overlap with other comorbid conditions. Ultrasound is a useful tool that can give a more detailed assessment of enthesitis. Research demonstrates that those with persistent ultrasound entheseal disease are at risk of progressive articular damage. With limited data to guide choice between biologic therapy for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients, we wanted to assess the response of ultrasound-confirmed enthesitis to different forms of biologic therapies and study its utility in making more informed decisions.

Methods

This was an open label observational study including patients aged ⩾18 years, who fulfil the classification criteria for PSA (CASPAR) and were due to commence on their first biologic therapy. The primary outcome was the change in MAdrid Sonographic Enthesitis Index (MASEI) score at 16 weeks of treatment. The MASEI score was also modified to assess the active elementary lesions (ActiveMASEI).

Results

In all, 80 PsA patients were enrolled with 75 patients completing the study [secukinumab n = 23 and tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) n = 52]. The mean reduction in MASEI score after 16 weeks of treatment was 3.42 with TNFi versus 1.74 with secukinumab (p = 0.097). There was a significant difference in the change in the MASEIActive score for TNFi versus secukinumab (4.37 versus 2.26; p = 0.030) and this difference was more pronounced when only power Doppler signal within 2 mm of the enthesis insertion was included (4.37 versus 2.00; p = 0.007). Clinical outcomes were similar for both classes of biologic apart from a significant reduction in regards to the Dermatology Life Quality Index and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score with secukinumab versus TNFi.

Conclusions

We have for the first time compared the effect of ultrasound-confirmed enthesitis between different forms of biologic therapies for PsA. We have seen an overall improvement in entheseal scores for both classes of medications and demonstrated a larger reduction in active entheseal disease for TNFi versus secukinumab that merits further exploration.

Utility of Musculoskeletal Ultrasound in Psoriatic Arthritis

PURPOSE

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic autoimmune disease that causes a variety of musculoskeletal abnormalities. Musculoskeletal ultrasound in PsA is becoming increasingly popular, both in clinical practice and research. This narrative reviews recent literature on the utility of ultrasound in PsA.

METHODS

A search of PubMed was used to identify publications written in English, with titles containing the term psoriatic arthritis and either ultrasound, ultrasonography, or sonographic. A total of 178 publications were identified; those that were not relevant (n = 59), were not original research (n = 45), or that had small (<30) sample sizes (n = 34) were excluded, leaving 40 studies for review of the use of ultrasound in various aspects of PsA. Publications with similar findings were grouped into seven domains: (1) the use of ultrasound findings compared to clinical assessment; (2) the use of ultrasound in the assessment of enthesitis; (3) the use of ultrasound in the assessment of nails; (4) the use of ultrasound as a screening tool in patients with psoriasis at risk for PsA; (5) the use of ultrasound in differentiating PsA from other similar conditions; (6) the use of ultrasound as a measure of disease activity; and (7) the use of ultrasound compared to MRI.

FINDINGS

In recent studies, ultrasound measures of inflammation tended to agree with objective clinical findings of disease, such as swollen joint counts, while being less influenced by subjective measures, such as pain. Ultrasound has utility in the assessment of enthesitis and psoriatic nail disease in PsA, and as an overall measure of disease activity. Ultrasound-based outcomes measures have been used in observational studies and in clinical trials involving PsA, and may have utility as a measure of treatment response. The findings from recent studies suggest that ultrasound may have utility in improving the accuracy and precision of screening programs designed to identify subclinical PsA in cohorts of patients with psoriasis; however, cost-efficacy remains to be determined. Beyond screening, ultrasound may have utility in the diagnosis of PsA in patients with suspected inflammatory arthritis, and ultrasound measures of inflammation agree with MRI measures of inflammation, meaning that incorporating ultrasound into clinical practice might help to overcome the barriers associated with MRI.

IMPLICATIONS

As ultrasound technology continues to advance, and associated costs decrease, it is likely that ultrasound will become more integrated into the clinical journeys of patients with PsA.

Ultrasound Enthesitis in Psoriasis Patients with or without Psoriatic Arthritis, a Cross-Sectional Analysis

Background and objectives: The main objective of the current study was to describe the prevalence of enthesitis at different sites in a group of patients with psoriasis with or without psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Materials and Methods: The study included adult patients with psoriasis who underwent clinical examination, laboratory tests and ultrasound examination of the entheses. The enthesitis ultrasound scores (BUSES, MASEI, GUESS) were evaluated; the presence of OMERACT-defined enthesitis was also recorded for each scan site. Results: The study included 16 (57.1%) patients with PsA and 12 (42.9%) patients with psoriasis, with an increased average body mass index (29.3 kg/m2). Compared to psoriasis patients, PsA patients had a higher prevalence of nail psoriasis (68.8% compared to 33.3%; p = 0.063). There were no significant differences regarding the clinical examination of entheses between patients with psoriasis and patients with PsA (p = 0.459). Ultrasound scores, BUSES, GUESS and MASEI proved to have statistically significant higher median values in PsA patients compared to psoriasis patients. Compared to psoriasis patients, PsA patients had a significantly higher prevalence of OMERACT-defined enthesitis of the quadriceps tendon and inferior patellar ligament (both 81.3% compared to 25.0%, p = 0.003). Clinical examination of the lateral epicondyle and of the superior patellar ligament was consistent with their ultrasound examination (κ = 0.357, p = 0.043, respectively, κ = 0.404, p = 0.008). Conclusions: Clinical enthesitis scores do not differ between psoriasis and PsA patients. All analyzed ultrasound scores are significantly higher in patients with PsA. OMERACT-defined enthesitis has the ability to discriminate sonographic enthesitis between the two subgroups for bilateral quadriceps and inferior patellar tendon enthesitis. Bilateral ultrasound damage of entheses can suggest a PsA diagnosis.

Sex- and gender-related differences in psoriatic arthritis

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is an inflammatory musculoskeletal disease with a chronic, progressive course. Various aspects of PsA, including its clinical features, disease course and response to treatment, are influenced by sociodemographic characteristics of the patient. This includes patient sex, the biological attributes associated with being male or female, and gender, a sociocultural construct that comprises attitudes, traits and behaviours associated with being a man or a woman. An understanding of sex- and gender-related differences in PsA, as well as their underlying mechanisms, is therefore important for individualized care. In this narrative review, the influence of sex and gender on PsA manifestation and course, patient function and quality of life, and their association with comorbidities are described. Sex- and gender-related disparities in response to advanced therapies and their potential underlying mechanisms are delineated. Differences in pathophysiological mechanisms between male and female patients including genetics, immune and hormonal mechanisms are discussed. Finally, fertility and pregnancy outcomes in PsA are outlined. By adopting sex and gender lenses, this review is aimed at highlighting key differences between male and female patients with PsA and uncovering mechanisms underlying these differences, ultimately promoting individualized care of men and women with PsA and informing future research in this area.

Improving Imaging Modalities in Early Psoriatic Arthritis: The Role of Ultrasound in Early Diagnosis of Psoriatic Arthritis

Objective: Despite recent advances, early diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) remains a challenge in clinical practice. Ultrasound (US) could be a useful tool for the diagnosis and management of PsA. The objective of this review was to determine the role of US in early diagnosis of PsA.

Methods: We have performed a literature review aiming to evaluate studies on US findings in psoriasis and their predictive value of progression to PsA, as well as studies on US features specific for PsA in comparison with other conditions.

Results: A total of 40 studies were included. Sixteen studies assessed US findings in psoriasis, of which only 3 prospectively evaluated the role of US in predicting progression to PsA. Patients with PsA had a greater frequency of US abnormalities, in particular enthesitis and Power Doppler(PD) signal compared to patients with psoriasis only. In the longitudinal studies, psoriatic patients with higher enthesopathy scores at baseline were more likely to progress to PsA. Twenty-four studies evaluated US abnormalities in PsA and compared them to other conditions. Most specific US features that distinguish PsA from psoriasis were PD signal and erosions in joints and entheses. Extra-synovial changes, including peri-tendinous dermal soft tissue oedema with associated PD signal and flexor tendon enthesopathy, as well as thickening of the pulleys in the flexor tendons were highly characteristic for PsA, as they were frequently found in PsA patients, but in none of the RA patients. US-detected entheseal abnormalities in particular erosions and PD signal were more frequent in patients with PsA compared to fibromyalgia.

Conclusion: Despite the wide use of US in PsA, more research is needed to identify predictive factors of progression to PsA in patients with psoriasis, as well as to determine most specific US features that differentiate PsA from other conditions.