The SLE-DAS provides an accurate and feasible flare tool in the clinical setting: a validation study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the criterion validity of the SLE disease activity score (SLE-DAS) flare tool and compare its performance in identifying flares against other instruments.

METHODS

Patients with SLE fulfilling SLE-DAS low disease activity at baseline were included from two academic lupus clinics. During follow-up, flares were identified by the senior attending clinician, applying the expert-consensus-based definition as gold-standard. The first clinical flare from flaring patients, and the first visit after baseline in patients without flares were analysed. In each no flare/flare visits, we assessed flares by SLE-DAS (score increase ≥1.72), classic-SELENA Flare Index (c-SELENA FI), revised-SELENA FI (r-SELENA FI), and SLEDAI-2K (score increase ≥4). We estimated the sensitivity, specificity, and Cohen's Kappa agreement of each flare tool against the gold-standard.

RESULTS

A total of 442 patients were included and followed-up for 22.9 (14.2) months. Incidence of flares was 8.19/100 patient-years, with 69 patients experiencing flares. The SLE-DAS identified 96.6% of the expert-defined flares implying a treatment change and classified 28.0% of those as moderate/severe. Sensitivity and specificity for the gold-standard flare definition were: SLE-DAS 97.1% and 97.3%, c-SELENA FI 88.4% and 98.1%, r-SELENA FI 88.4% and 96.8%, SLEDAI-2K 56.5% and 99.2%, respectively. Kappa coefficients of these instruments were 0.902 (95% CI: 0.847, 0.957), 0.870 (95% CI: 0.805, 0.935), 0.832 (95% CI: 0.761, 0.903), and 0.663 (95% CI: 0.557, 0.769), respectively. The number of flare misclassifications was lowest with the SLE-DAS, and highest with the SLEDAI-2K.

CONCLUSION

The SLE-DAS accurately identifies and categorizes flares as mild or moderate/severe. It is feasible and, thus, may help the physicians' treatment decisions in the clinical practice setting.

Anti-SSA Ro52 and anti-Ro60 autoantibodies: association with clinical phenotypes

OBJECTIVES

Anti-SSA autoantibodies can be differentiated according to their antigenic target proteins as anti-Ro60 (60 kDa) or anti-Ro52 (52 kDa). Anti-SSA(Ro60) antibodies are clearly associated with connective tissue diseases (CTD), but the clinical significance of anti-SSA(Ro52) antibodies remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to analyse the disease phenotype of patients with anti-Ro52 and/or anti-Ro60 antibodies.

METHODS

A multicentre, cross-sectional study was carried out of positive anti-Ro52 and/or Ro60 antibodies patients followed at 10 Rheumatology centres from January 2018 until December 2021. Patients were categorised into 3 groups: group 1 (Ro52+/Ro60-); group 2 (Ro52-/Ro60+); group 3 (Ro52+/Ro60+). Antinuclear antibodies were evaluated by indirect immunofluorescence assay and further screened for anti-extractable nuclear antigen (ENA) antibodies. Demographicsand clinical data were compared between the 3 groups, by patients' medical chart review. Univariate analysis was performed and subsequently logistic regression was used to identify intergroup differences and calculate the odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI).

RESULTS

We included 776 patients [female: 83.1%; median age: 59 (46-71) years]. Groups 1, 2, and 3 comprised 31.1%, 32.6%, and 36.3% of the patients, respectively. Anti-Ro52 antibody alone was more frequently associated with non-rheumatic diseases, older age, and men (p<0.05). Among patients with CTD, the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus is 3 and 2 times more prevalent in groups 2 and 3, respectively, than in group 1 [OR 2.8 (95% CI 1.60, 4.97), p<0.001; OR 2.2 (95% CI 1.28, 3.86), p<0.01]. In group 2, the diagnosis of undifferentiated CTD is more frequent than in the other groups. Group 1 was more frequently associated with inflammatory myositis than group 2 [OR 0.09 (95% CI 0.01, 0.33), p<0.001] or group 3 [OR 0.08 (95% CI 0.01, 0.29), p<0.001]. Group 1 was also more frequently associated with arthritis (p<0.01), interstitial lung disease (p<0.01), and myositis (p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-Ro52+ antibody alone is frequently found in patients with non-rheumatic diseases. In addition, anti-Ro52+ antibody is also prevalent in patients with CTD and associated with clinical phenotypes that are different from anti-Ro60+ antibody.

Power Doppler signal at the enthesis and bone erosions are the most discriminative OMERACT ultrasound lesions for SpA: results from the DEUS (Defining Enthesitis on Ultrasound in Spondyloarthritis) multicentre study

OBJECTIVES

To assess, in spondyloarthritis (SpA), the discriminative value of the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) ultrasound lesions of enthesitis and their associations with clinical features in this population.

METHODS

In this multicentre study involving 20 rheumatology centres, clinical and ultrasound examinations of the lower limb large entheses were performed in 413 patients with SpA (axial SpA and psoriatic arthritis) and 282 disease controls (osteoarthritis and fibromyalgia). 'Active enthesitis' was defined as (1) power Doppler (PD) at the enthesis grade ≥1 plus entheseal thickening and/or hypoechoic areas, or (2) PD grade >1 (independent of the presence of entheseal thickening and/or hypoechoic areas).

RESULTS

In the univariate analysis, all OMERACT lesions except enthesophytes/calcifications showed a significant association with SpA. PD (OR=8.77, 95% CI 4.40 to 19.20, p<0.001) and bone erosions (OR=4.75, 95% CI 2.43 to 10.10, p<0.001) retained this association in the multivariate analysis. Among the lower limb entheses, only the Achilles tendon was significantly associated with SpA (OR=1.93, 95% CI 1.30 to 2.88, p<0.001) in the multivariate analyses. Active enthesitis showed a significant association with SpA (OR=9.20, 95% CI 4.21 to 23.20, p<0.001), and unlike the individual OMERACT ultrasound lesions it was consistently associated with most clinical measures of SpA disease activity and severity in the regression analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

This large multicentre study assessed the value of different ultrasound findings of enthesitis in SpA, identifying the most discriminative ultrasound lesions and entheseal sites for SpA. Ultrasound could differentiate between SpA-related enthesitis and other forms of entheseal pathology (ie, mechanical enthesitis), thus improving the assessment of entheseal involvement in SpA.

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Score Remission and Low Disease Activity States Discriminate Drug From Placebo and Better Health-Related Quality of Life

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to evaluate the ability of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS) remission and low disease activity (LDA) to discriminate active drug from placebo and to discriminate outcomes in the patients' perspective (health-related quality of life [HR-QoL]) in SLE trials.

METHODS

This was a post hoc analysis of the pooled Belimumab in Subjects With SLE (BLISS)-52 (NCT00424476) and BLISS-76 (NCT00410384) trials data. SLE-DAS remission and LDA attainment and discrimination between belimumab and placebo at 52 weeks were compared using chi-square tests. At week 52, 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) scores were compared between patients attaining SLE-DAS remission versus nonremission and SLE-DAS LDA versus non-LDA using the t-test and Mann-Whitney test. Mean changes from week 0 to 52 in SF-36 and FACIT-F scores were compared between groups using multivariate regression analysis adjusted for baseline scores.

RESULTS

At week 52, significantly more patients attained SLE-DAS LDA taking belimumab 1 mg/kg (17.9% vs 13.0%; P = 0.023; odds ratio [OR] 1.459; relative risk [RR] 1.377; number needed to treat [NNT] 20.4) and 10 mg/kg (21.7% vs 13.0%; P < 0.001; OR 1.853; RR 1.668; NNT 11.5) compared with placebo. Likewise, more patients attained SLE-DAS remission taking belimumab 10 mg/kg compared to placebo (14.7% vs 10.1%; P = 0.019; OR 1.532; RR 1.454; NNT 21.7). At week 52, patients attaining SLE-DAS remission and LDA presented higher SF-36 domain and summary scores (all P < 0.001) and FACIT-F scores (both P < 0.001). Mean improvements from baseline in SF-36 and FACIT-F scores were significantly higher in patients achieving SLE-DAS remission and LDA.

CONCLUSION

SLE-DAS remission and LDA showed discriminant ability for identifying patients receiving active drug in SLE clinical trials. Attainment of these SLE-DAS targets are associated with better HR-QoL.

What is the best instrument to measure disease activity in SLE? - SLE-DAS vs Easy BILAG

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a heterogeneous condition making assessment of disease activity challenging. However, thorough assessment is essential to evaluate patients longitudinally, to guide therapeutic decisions, and for clinical trials. Currently, the most popular disease activity index in clinical practice and trials is SLEDAI-2K. Its main advantage is ease of use, but significant weaknesses of SLEDAI-2K are omission of several serious manifestations, inability to capture change within an organ system, and fixed severity weightings that are often inappropriate. Recently several groups have developing improved tools. We report here the debate held at CORA meeting on this issue. SLE-DAS includes 17 weighted clinical and laboratory parameters including continuous measures in 4 items with an online calculator. A higher sensitivity to change compared to SLEDAI-2K has been demonstrated in its validation studies. Easy BILAG is an improved format of the BILAG-2004 that retains its content but greatly simplified. Its scoring using a single-page form that incorporates concise definitions for key terms next to clinical items. Easy-BILAG demonstrates higher accuracy and less variability and increased and better user feedback compared to the standard BILAG-2004 format. Both the indices discussed at CORA showed an advantage in measuring disease activity compared to SLEDAI.

Predictors of flare in SLE patients fulfilling lupus low disease activity state: a cohort study of 292 patients with 36-month follow-up

OBJECTIVES

The treatment target in SLE should be maintained stable by preventing flares. The objectives were to identify predictors of flare in patients attaining lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS), and to assess whether remission with no glucocorticoids is associated with lower risk of flares.

METHODS

This was a cohort study of SLE patients followed in a referral centre over 3 years. Baseline was the first visit where each patient attained LLDAS. Flares up to 36 months' follow-up were identified by three instruments: revised Safety of Estrogen in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment (SELENA) Flare Index (r-SFI), SLEDAI-2000 (SLEDAI-2K) and SLE Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS). Demographic, clinical and laboratory parameters at baseline were evaluated as predictors of flare, with distinct models for each flare instrument, using survival analysis with univariate followed by multivariate Cox regression. Hazard ratios (HR) were determined with 95% CI.

RESULTS

A total of 292 patients fulfilling LLDAS were included. Over follow-up, 28.4%, 24.7% and 13.4% of the patients developed one or more flare, according to r-SFI, SLE-DAS and SLEDAI-2K definitions, respectively. After multivariate analysis, the predictors of SLE-DAS flares were presence of anti-U1-ribonucleoprotein (anti-U1RNP) (HR = 2.16, 95% CI 1.30, 3.59), SLE-DAS score at baseline (HR = 1.27, 95% CI 1.04, 1.54) and immunosuppressants (HR = 2.43, 95% CI 1.43, 4.09). These predictors were equally significant for r-SFI and SLEDAI-2K flares. Remitted patients with no glucocorticoids presented a lower risk of SLE-DAS flares (HR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.37, 0.98).

CONCLUSION

In patients with LLDAS, anti-U1RNP, disease activity scored by SLE-DAS and SLE requiring maintenance immunosuppressants predict higher risk of flare. Remission with no glucocorticoids is associated with lower risk of flares.

Reliability assessment of ultrasound muscle echogenicity in patients with rheumatic diseases: Results of a multicenter international web-based study

Objectives

To investigate the inter/intra-reliability of ultrasound (US) muscle echogenicity in patients with rheumatic diseases.

Methods

Forty-two rheumatologists and 2 radiologists from 13 countries were asked to assess US muscle echogenicity of quadriceps muscle in 80 static images and 20 clips from 64 patients with different rheumatic diseases and 8 healthy subjects. Two visual scales were evaluated, a visual semi-quantitative scale (0-3) and a continuous quantitative measurement ("VAS echogenicity," 0-100). The same assessment was repeated to calculate intra-observer reliability. US muscle echogenicity was also calculated by an independent research assistant using a software for the analysis of scientific images (ImageJ). Inter and intra reliabilities were assessed by means of prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted Kappa (PABAK), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and correlations through Kendall's Tau and Pearson's Rho coefficients.

Results

The semi-quantitative scale showed a moderate inter-reliability [PABAK = 0.58 (0.57-0.59)] and a substantial intra-reliability [PABAK = 0.71 (0.68-0.73)]. The lowest inter and intra-reliability results were obtained for the intermediate grades (i.e., grade 1 and 2) of the semi-quantitative scale. "VAS echogenicity" showed a high reliability both in the inter-observer [ICC = 0.80 (0.75-0.85)] and intra-observer [ICC = 0.88 (0.88-0.89)] evaluations. A substantial association was found between the participants assessment of the semi-quantitative scale and "VAS echogenicity" [ICC = 0.52 (0.50-0.54)]. The correlation between these two visual scales and ImageJ analysis was high (tau = 0.76 and rho = 0.89, respectively).

Conclusion

The results of this large, multicenter study highlighted the overall good inter and intra-reliability of the US assessment of muscle echogenicity in patients with different rheumatic diseases.

A new error-monitoring brain-computer interface based on reinforcement learning for people with autism spectrum disorders

Objective.Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are emerging as promising cognitive training tools in neurodevelopmental disorders, as they combine the advantages of traditional computerized interventions with real-time tailored feedback. We propose a gamified BCI based on non-volitional neurofeedback for cognitive training, aiming at reaching a neurorehabilitation tool for application in autism spectrum disorders (ASDs).Approach.The BCI consists of an emotional facial expression paradigm controlled by an intelligent agent that makes correct and wrong actions, while the user observes and judges the agent's actions. The agent learns through reinforcement learning (RL) an optimal strategy if the participant generates error-related potentials (ErrPs) upon incorrect agent actions. We hypothesize that this training approach will allow not only the agent to learn but also the BCI user, by participating through implicit error scrutiny in the process of learning through operant conditioning, making it of particular interest for disorders where error monitoring processes are altered/compromised such as in ASD. In this paper, the main goal is to validate the whole methodological BCI approach and assess whether it is feasible enough to move on to clinical experiments. A control group of ten neurotypical participants and one participant with ASD tested the proposed BCI approach.Main results.We achieved an online balanced-accuracy in ErrPs detection of 81.6% and 77.1%, respectively for two different game modes. Additionally, all participants achieved an optimal RL strategy for the agent at least in one of the test sessions.Significance.The ErrP classification results and the possibility of successfully achieving an optimal learning strategy, show the feasibility of the proposed methodology, which allows to move towards clinical experimentation with ASD participants to assess the effectiveness of the approach as hypothesized.

Reliability assessment of the definition of ultrasound enthesitis in SpA: results of a large, multicentre, international, web-based study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the reliability of the OMERACT US Task Force definition of US enthesitis in SpA.

METHODS

In this web exercise, based on the evaluation of 101 images and 39 clips of the main entheses of the lower limbs, the elementary components included in the OMERACT definition of US enthesitis in SpA (hypoechoic areas, entheseal thickening, power Doppler signal at the enthesis, enthesophytes/calcifications, bone erosions) were assessed by 47 rheumatologists from 37 rheumatology centres in 15 countries. Inter- and intra-observer reliability of the US components of enthesitis was calculated using Light's kappa, Cohen's kappa, Prevalence And Bias Adjusted Kappa (PABAK) and their 95% CIs.

RESULTS

Bone erosions and power Doppler signal at the enthesis showed the highest overall inter-reliability [Light's kappa: 0.77 (0.76-0.78), 0.72 (0.71-0.73), respectively; PABAK: 0.86 (0.86-0.87), 0.73 (0.73-0.74), respectively], followed by enthesophytes/calcifications [Light's kappa: 0.65 (0.64-0.65), PABAK: 0.67 (0.67-0.68)]. This was moderate for entheseal thickening [Light's kappa: 0.41 (0.41-0.42), PABAK: 0.41 (0.40-0.42)], and fair for hypoechoic areas [Light's kappa: 0.37 (0.36-0.38); PABAK: 0.37 (0.37-0.38)]. A similar trend was observed in the intra-reliability exercise, although this was characterized by an overall higher degree of reliability for all US elementary components compared with the inter-observer evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this multicentre, international, web-based study show a good reliability of the OMERACT US definition of bone erosions, power Doppler signal at the enthesis and enthesophytes/calcifications. The low reliability of entheseal thickening and hypoechoic areas raises questions about the opportunity to revise the definition of these two major components for the US diagnosis of enthesitis.

OP0147 THE SLE-DAS REMISSION AND LOW DISEASE ACTIVITY STATES DISCRIMINATE DRUG FROM PLACEBO AND BETTER HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE: POST-HOC ANALYSIS OF THE BLISS-52 AND BLISS-76 PHASE III TRIALS

Background

Accurate and practical outcome measures for clinical trials in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are lacking. The SLE Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS) is a recently validated 17-item instrument, with high accuracy and sensitivity to changes in SLE disease activity. The SLE-DAS definitions of remission and low disease activity (LDA) were newly validated in the clinical setting1,2. These definitions may constitute accurate and easy to apply endpoints for SLE trials.

Objectives

(1) To evaluate the ability of SLE-DAS remission and LDA definitions to discriminate drug from placebo in SLE phase 3 trials; (2) To determine if attainment of these SLE-DAS targets are associated with better health-related quality of life (HR-QoL).

Methods

Post-hoc analysis of the merged study population in the BLISS-52 and -76 trials (NCT00424476; NCT00410384) of intravenous belimumab versus placebo for moderate to severe SLE disease activity. We analyzed the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG), Physician Global Assessment (PGA), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) and 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) trial data. The fulfillment of SLE-DAS remission and LDA definitions were retrospectively assessed from the individual participants’ data. Proportion of patients attaining SLE-DAS Boolean remission (defined as absence of all SLE-DAS clinical items and prednisone ≤5mg/day) and LDA (defined as SLE-DAS≤2.48 and prednisone ≤7.5mg/day), at week 52, was compared between belimumab and placebo arms, using likelihood ratio chi-square test. We further compared the SF-36 physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) and domain scores and the FACIT score between patients attaining SLE-DAS remission vs non-remission and SLE-DAS LDA vs non-LDA, using t-test and Mann-Whitney test.

Results

A total of 1684 SLE patients were included: 562 on placebo, 559 on belimumab 1mg/Kg and 563 on belimumab 10mg/Kg. At week 52, significantly more patients attained SLE-DAS LDA on belimumab 1mg/Kg and 10mg/Kg as compared with placebo (13.0% vs 17.9%, OR=1.459, p=0.023, and 13.0% vs 21.7%, OR=1.853, p<0.001, respectively). Likewise, more patients attained SLE-DAS remission on belimumab 10mg/Kg as compared with placebo (10.1% vs 14.7%, OR= 1.532, p=0.019) (Table 1). Importantly, none of the patients achieving SLE-DAS remission or LDA presented a new BILAG A or more than 1 new B domain score, neither a worsening in PGA≥0.3.

Table 1.

Attainment of SLE-DAS Boolean remission and LDA at week 52 in BLISS-52 and BLISS-76 trials, according to the treatment groups (n =1684).

PlaceboBelimumab 1mg/KgBelimumab 10mg/KgSLE-DAS remission (n=211)10.1%12.7%, OR=1.289 (0.89-1.866), p=0.17814.7%, OR 1.532 (1.069-2.195), p=0.019SLE-DAS LDA (n=295)13.0%17.9%, OR=1.459 (1.052-2.025), p=0.02321.7%, OR 1.853 (1.349-2.545), p<0.001

LDA: Low disease activity; SLE-DAS Boolean remission: absence of all SLE-DAS clinical items and prednisone ≤5mg/day; SLE-DAS LDA: SLE-DAS≤2.48 and prednisone ≤7.5mg/day.

At week 52, patients attaining SLE-DAS remission and SLE-DAS LDA presented higher SF-36 domain and summary scores (all p<0.001) (Figure 1). Additionally, FACIT scores were higher in patients attaining SLE-DAS remission than non-remission patients (mean±SD: 38.24±10.65 vs 33.45±12.13, p<0.001), and in patients attaining SLE-DAS LDA than non-LDA (mean±SD: 37.22±11.00 vs 33.37±12.17, p<0.001), at week 52.

Figure 1.

Mean SF-36 domain and summary scores at week 52; *p<0.001; MCS, Mental Component Summary; PCS, Physical Component Summary; SF-36, Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form.

Conclusion

The SLE-DAS remission and LDA showed discriminant validity for identifying patients receiving active drug in clinical trials. These treatment targets are associated with better HR-QoL and lower fatigue.

References

[1]Jesus D, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2021;80:1568-74.

[2]Assuncao H, et al. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021;3;keab895.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank GlaxoSmithKline (Uxbridge, UK) for granting access to the data from the BLISS-52 and 76 trials through the Clinical Study Data Request consortium.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

POS0119 SLE-DAS REMISSION AND LOW DISEASE ACTIVITY STATES ARE ASSOCIATED WITH IMPROVED HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE AND FATIGUE: POST-HOC ANALYSIS OF THE BLISS-52 AND BLISS-76 PHASE III TRIALS

Background

Accurate and practical outcome measures for clinical trials in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are lacking. The SLE Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS) is a recently validated 17-item instrument, with high accuracy and sensitivity to changes in SLE disease activity. The SLE-DAS definitions of remission and low disease activity (LDA) were newly validated against disease activity physician-applied measures in the clinical setting [1, 2]. Criterion validity of SLE-DAS for Patient Reported Outcomes, namely health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) and fatigue needs to be assessed.

Objectives

To evaluate if the attainment of SLE-DAS remission and LDA states is associated with improvements in HR-QoL and fatigue.

Methods

Post-hoc analysis of the merged study population in the BLISS-52 and -76 trials (NCT00424476; NCT00410384) of intravenous belimumab versus placebo for moderate to severe SLE disease activity. We analysed the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) and 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) trial data. Fulfillment of SLE-DAS remission (defined as absence of all SLE-DAS clinical items and prednisone ≤5mg/day) and LDA (defined as SLE-DAS≤2.48 and prednisone ≤7.5mg/day) definitions were retrospectively assessed from the individual participants’ data. Mean changes from study baseline to week 52 in FACIT and SF-36 physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) and domain scores were compared between patients attaining at week 52 the SLE-DAS remission vs non-remission and the SLE-DAS LDA vs non-LDA using multivariate regression analysis adjusted for baseline scores.

Results

A total of 1684 SLE patients were included. Few patients were in SLE-DAS remission (0.5%) and LDA (0.8%) at study entry. At week 52, 12.5% patients attained SLE-DAS remission and 17.5% attained SLE-DAS LDA. Mean improvements in SF-36 PCS and MCS scores were greater in patients that attained SLE-DAS remission vs non-remission (5.4 vs 3.4, and 4.6 vs 2.7, respectively; multivariate p<0.005 for both) and SLE-DAS LDA vs non-LDA (5.0 vs 3.4 and 4.6 vs 2.6, respectively; multivariate p<0.005 for both), at week 52 (Figure 1). Similarly, improvements in all individual domain scores were greater in SLE-DAS remission vs non-remission patients (all multivariate p<0.005) and SLE-DAS LDA vs non-LDA patients (all multivariate p<0.005) (Figure 1). Importantly, improvements in the summary scores and in all the individual domain scores largely exceeded the minimum clinically important differences (MCIDs) of 2.5 and 5 points, respectively, in those patients attaining SLE-DAS remission or LDA.

Figure 1.

Mean changes in SF-36 domains and summary scores from baseline to week 52. #p<0.005; *p<0.001; MICD, Minimum Clinically Important Difference; MCS, Mental Component Summary; PCS, Physical Component Summary; SF-36, Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form; SLE-DAS, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Score.

Additionally, mean improvements in FACIT scores were higher in SLE-DAS remission than non-remission (6.3 vs 3.6, multivariate p<0.001) and in SLE-DAS LDA than non-LDA (5.9 vs 3.6, multivariate p<0.001), and exceeded the MCID of 4 points.

Conclusion

Attainment of SLE-DAS remission and LDA is associated with meaningful improvement in HR-QoL and fatigue.

References

[1]Jesus D, et al. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS) enables accurate and user-friendly definitions of clinical remission and categories of disease activity. Ann Rheum Dis 2021;80:1568-74.

[2]Assunção H, et al. Definition of Low Disease Activity State based on the SLE-DAS: Derivation and validation in a multicentre real-life cohort. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021;3;keab895.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank GlaxoSmithKline (Uxbridge, UK) for granting access to the data from the BLISS-52 and 76 trials through the Clinical Study Data Request consortium.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

Definition of Low Disease Activity State based on the SLE-DAS: Derivation and validation in a multicentre real-life cohort

OBJECTIVES

To derive and validate a definition of low disease activity (LDA) for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) based on the SLE Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS), in a real-life multicentre cohort of SLE patients.

METHODS

Derivation was conducted using data from a monocentric cohort of SLE (Portugal), and validation was performed in a multicentre cohort (Italy, France, and Spain). The Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) was used as comparator. We applied receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis against the LLDAS to determine the cut-off of SLE-DAS for LDA using bootstrap methodology. In a second step, we tested a definition of SLE-DAS LDA that included: (i) the statistically derived SLE-DAS upper threshold for LDA, and (ii) prednisone dose ≤7.5 mg/day. In the multicentre validation cohort, we assessed the classification performance of this SLE-DAS LDA definition.

RESULTS

We included 774 patients, 300 in the derivation and 474 in the validation cohorts, respectively. In the derivation cohort, the optimal cut-off to identify patients in LLDAS was SLE-DAS ≤2.48, presenting an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.965 (95%CI 0.935-0.994). When applied to the multicentre validation cohort, the SLE-DAS LDA definition showed a sensitivity of 97.1% and a specificity of 97.7% for LLDAS and an almost perfect agreement (Cohen's Kappa =0.933; p< 0.001). McNemar's test found no significant differences between the two definitions (p= 0.092).

CONCLUSION

The SLE-DAS LDA is a validated, accurate, and easy-to-use definition for classifying SLE patients in LDA state.

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS) enables accurate and user-friendly definitions of clinical remission and categories of disease activity

OBJECTIVES

There is an unmet need for accurate and user-friendly definitions of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disease activity and remission. We aimed to derive and validate the SLE Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS) definitions for disease activity categories and clinical remission state.

METHODS

Derivation was conducted at Padova Lupus Clinic (Italy). Validation was prospectively performed at Cochin Lupus Clinic (France) and by post hoc analysis of BLISS-76 trial. At each clinic, an expert classified patients in three categories: remission, mild or moderate/severe activity. The SLE-DAS cut-offs were derived using the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in Padova cohort; its performance was assessed against expert classification in Cochin cohort and British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) index in BLISS-76. Gold standard for clinical remission state was the fulfilment of Definition Of Remission In SLE. A Boolean and an index-based definitions of remission were sustained by chi-square automatic interaction detection algorithm. An SLE-DAS online calculator was developed and tested.

RESULTS

We included 1190 patients with SLE: 221 in the derivation cohort and 969 in the validation cohorts (150 from Cochin; 819 from BLISS-76). Derived cut-offs were: remission, SLE-DAS ≤2.08; mild activity, 2.08<SLE-DAS≤7.64; moderate/severe activity, SLE-DAS >7.64. Regarding validation in Cochin cohort, sensitivity and specificity are above 90%, 82% and 95% for remission, mild and moderate/severe activity, respectively. The SLE-DAS Boolean-based and index-based remission showed sensitivity of 100% and specificity above 97%.

CONCLUSION

The SLE-DAS is an accurate and easy-to-use tool for defining SLE clinical remission state and disease activity categories, validated against expert assessment and BILAG.

High patient global assessment scores in patients with rheumatoid arthritis otherwise in remission do not reflect subclinical inflammation

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether high patient global assessment (PGA) scores by patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) otherwise in remission reflect subclinical inflammation.

METHODS

Cross-sectional, single-center study, including consecutive RA patients. Remission states were defined based on the ACR/EULAR Boolean definition: 4V-remission (tender and swollen 28-joint counts (TJC28/SJC28), C-reactive protein (CRP), and PGA all≤1), PGA-near-remission (the same, except PGA>1), and non-remission (any of TJC28, SJC28, CRP>1). A blinded expert musculoskeletal ultrasonographer scanned 44 joints, 38 tendon sheaths, 4 bursae on the same day of the clinical evaluation. Each structure was assessed for the presence of Grey Scale synovial hypertrophy (GS) and Power Doppler (PD), both scored using a semi-quantitative scale (0-3 points). The Global OMERACT-EULAR Synovitis Score (GLOESS, 0-132, primary outcome), and a global tenosynovitis/bursitis score (GTBS) were compared between remission states, using non-parametric tests. Different sensitivity analyses comparing GS and PD subscores were performed.

RESULTS

In total, 130 patients (mean age 63 years, 86% female, average disease duration 14 years) were included 40 being in 4V-remission, 40 in PGA-near-remission, 50 in non-remission. 4v-remission and PGA-near-remission presented similar median (IQR) GLOESS, [6 (5-11) and 4 (1-7), P>0.05, respectively] and GTBS [0 (0-1) and 0 (0-2), P>0.05, respectively]. The same was observed in GS, PD scores, and in global synovitis score considering only the 16 joints not included in 28-joint counts. These observations were confirmed in patients with≤5 years disease duration.

CONCLUSIONS

Subclinical inflammation is not present among persons with elevated PGA who are otherwise in remission. PGA-near-remission patients would be exposed to the risk of overtreatment if current treatment recommendations were strictly followed. This study supports the need to reconsider the role of PGA in definitions used to target immunosuppressive therapy and to provide a separate and enhanced focus to the patient's experience of the disease.

POS0762 CAN THE SLE-DAS SUBSTITUTE BILAG TO MEASURE LUPUS DISEASE ACTIVITY IN CLINICAL TRIALS? POST-HOC ANALYSIS OF THE BLISS-76 TRIAL

Background:

The primary endpoint for randomized clinical trials (RCT) in Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is usually defined as proportion of responders in a composite index. The most widely used are British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) and Systemic Lupus Responder Index (SRI). Both comprise BILAG along with SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI). BICLA and SRI are complex and time-consuming to assess.

The SLE Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS) is an easy to apply, validated, continuous disease activity measure, highly correlated with SLEDAI, with higher accuracy and sensitivity-to-change as compared to SLEDAI1.

We hypothesize that SLE-DAS can also identify the SLE disease activity information from BILAG, thus dispensing the use of composite indexes for RCT.

Objectives:

To compare the ability of the SLE-DAS and the Safety of Estrogen in Lupus National Assessment (SELENA)-SLEDAI to discriminate between BILAG classification of mild vs. moderate vs. severe disease activity.

Methods:

Post-hoc analysis of all intention-to-treat patients in the BLISS-76 (NCT00410384) RCT at the baseline study visit. SELENA-SLEDAI and BILAG were assessed at time of the study visits and SLE-DAS was retrospectively scored from the study database. Patients’ disease activity was classified as: (i) mild (no BILAG B or A scores in any organ domain); (ii) moderate (1 BILAG B, no A scores); (iii) severe (≥2 BILAG B and/or ≥1 BILAG A). Ability of the SLE-DAS and SELENA-SLEDAI to differentiate between: (i) mild vs. moderate/severe disease activity; (ii) mild/moderate vs. severe disease activity (according to BILAG), were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The area under the ROC curves (AUCs) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) as a measure of discriminatory ability of the SLE-DAS and SELENA-SLEDAI were compared using Delong’s test for two correlated curves. Because AUC measurements might have restricted accuracy for imbalanced datasets, precision-recall (PR) curves and area under PR curves (AUC-PR) were also performed. Statistical significance was set at 0.05.

Results:

We included 819 patients, classified by BILAG as presenting mild (7.7%), moderate (28.8%) or severe (63.5%) disease activity. To differentiate mild vs. moderate/severe disease activity, the discriminatory ability of SLE-DAS was outstanding (AUC 0.948; 95%CI 0.923-0.973), while that of SELENA-SLEDAI was acceptable (AUC 0.729; 95%CI 0.657-0.801) (p<0.005) (figure 1A). To differentiate mild/moderate vs. severe disease activity, the discriminatory ability of SLE-DAS was excellent (AUC 0.873; 95%CI 9.846-0.899), while that of SELENA-SLEDAI was acceptable (AUC 0.707; 95%CI 0.670-0.744) (p<0.005) (figure 1B). The AUC-PR confirmed the higher performance of SLE-DAS over SELENA-SLEDAI to differentiate mild vs. moderate/severe disease activity (0.995 vs. 0.965, respectively) (figure 1C) and mild/moderate vs. severe disease activity (0.902 vs. 0.794, respectively) (figure 1D).

Figure 1.

Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves comparing the ability of the SLE-DAS and SELENA-SLEDAI to differentiate (A) mild vs. moderate/severe disease activity and (B) mild/moderate vs. severe disease activity, as assessed by BILAG; and Precision-recall (PR) curves comparing the performance of the SLE-DAS and SELENA-SLEDAI to differentiate (C) mild vs. moderate/severe disease activity and (D) mild/moderate vs. severe disease activity.

Conclusion:

The SLE-DAS presents excellent performance in assessing SLE disease activity categorized by BILAG scores, which is not the case for SELENA-SLEDAI. Further studies will aim to better define ability of SLE-DAS to substitute composite responder indices.

References:

[1]Jesus D, et al. Derivation and validation of the SLE Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS): a new SLE continuous measure with high sensitivity for changes in disease activity. Ann Rheum Dis 2019;78:365-71.

Acknowledgements:

The authors would like to thank GlaxoSmithKline (Uxbridge, UK) for granting access to the data from the BLISS-76 trial through the Clinical Study Data Request consortium.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

OP0293 OPTIMIZING A TOOL TO IDENTIFY LUPUS FLARES IN DAILY CLINICAL PRACTICE: SLE-DAS FLARE VERSUS SELENA FLARE INDEX

Background:

In the management of patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), it is of utmost importance to accurately identify lupus flares. There is a conceptual consensus definition of lupus flares [1]; however, the instruments used to identify flares in clinical trials, such as the SELENA Flare Index (SFI) are too cumbersome to apply in daily clinical practice. The SLE disease activity score (SLE-DAS) is a validated continuous measure of disease activity with higher sensitivity to change and validity in predicting damage accrual when compared to SLEDAI-2K. SLE-DAS is quickly scored with its online calculator. An increase in SLE-DAS ≥1.72 was validated as a clinically meaningful worsening of SLE disease activity. [2]

Objectives:

To compare the performance of SLE-DAS, classic SFI (c-SFI), revised SFI (r-SFI) and SLEDAI-2K in the identification of lupus flares in a real-life clinical setting.

Methods:

We included patients with SLE fulfilling classification criteria [ACR (1997) and/or SLICC and/or EULAR/ACR], followed at an academic lupus clinic from January 2017 to June 2020, and presenting with lupus low disease activity score (LLDAS) at baseline.

Flares occurring after baseline were identified as fulfillment of the conceptual definition of flare, as assessed by the senior lupus expert at time of each outpatient visit. For each flare event, we evaluated the fulfillment of flare criteria according to c-SFI, r-SFI, SLEDAI-2K (score increase ≥4 points from baseline), and SLE-DAS (score increase ≥1.72 from baseline). As control visits without flare, we considered the first visit after baseline, where we assessed the four tools, excluding those where a flare was identified by the gold-standard expert evaluation. Sensitivity and specificity of the four flare tools were estimated and McNemar’s test applied to assess differences with the gold-standard flare definition. The inter-instrument agreement with the gold-standard was assessed through Cohen’s Kappa.

Results:

We included 297 patients (female: 86.2%; mean age: 48.9±14.6 years, mean disease duration: 12.5±9.0 years). At baseline, all patients were in LLDAS, receiving ongoing antimalarials, immunosuppressants, and/or glucocorticoids in 91.0%, 43.8% and 33.6%, respectively. During follow-up, 22.2% developed flares. The analysis included 92 flares [musculoskeletal (40.2%); renal (23.9%), mucocutaneous (18.5%), haematological (5.9%), serositis (3.3%); multisystemic (8.7%)], with increase or change of treatment in 80.4% of these episodes, and 292 visits without flare considered as control.

There was no statistically significant difference between either SLE-DAS flare or c-SFI and the gold-standard expert flare definition (p=0.41 and p=0.82, respectively), while r-SFI and SLEDAI-2K flare were different from the gold-standard (Table 1). There was a strong agreement between SLE-DAS flare, c-SFI, r-SFI and the expert definition (Cohen’s kappa, Table 1).

Table 1.

Performance of the flare tools for the gold-standard flare definition.

Sensitivity (%)Specificity (%)McNemar’s§§Kappa§SLE-DAS flare90.195.0n.s.0.836c-SFI flare91.196.5n.s.0.869r-SFI flare93.492.9p<0.010.820SLEDAI-2K flare51.698.6p<0.00010.590

§§ McNemar’s test: significant difference from gold-standard if p<0.05; § Cohen’s kappa agreement (0-1) with the gold-standard flare definition; n.s.: non-significant

Conclusion:

The c-SFI and SLE-DAS showed the best performance in identifying SLE flares. The SLE-DAS flare definition is easier to apply and hence might be considered as an optimal tool to be used in daily clinical practice.

References:

[1]Ruperto N, Hanrahan LM, Alarcón GS, et al. International consensus for a definition of disease flare in lupus. Lupus. 2011;20(5):453-62.

[2]Jesus D, Matos A, Henriques C, et al. Derivation and validation of the SLE Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS): a new SLE continuous measure with high sensitivity for changes in disease activity. Ann Rheum Dis 2019; 78:365-71.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared.

OP0297 THE SLE-DAS ENABLES ACCURATE AND USER-FRIENDLY DEFINITIONS OF REMISSION AND CATEGORIES OF LUPUS DISEASE ACTIVITY: DERIVATION AND VALIDATION STUDY IN 1190 SLE PATIENTS

Background:

Treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is tailored according to the intensity of SLE disease activity and aims to achieve remission. Current definitions of remission and disease activity categories are mostly based on the SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI), which has important limitations. The SLE Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS) is a validated continuous disease activity score with higher accuracy in measuring SLE activity and higher sensitivity-to-change as compared to SLEDAI1. SLE-DAS is user-friendly with its online calculator.

Objectives:

To derive and validate the SLE-DAS cut-off values for defining SLE disease activity categories and SLE clinical remission state.

Methods:

Derivation study was conducted at the Padova Lupus Clinic. Validation was performed prospectively in patients from the Cochin Lupus Clinic and by post-hoc analysis of BLISS-76 (NCT00410384) trial. Gold-standard for clinical remission state was fulfillment of Definition Of Remission In SLE (DORIS). In Padova and Cochin Clinics, at time of inclusion, a senior clinician classified each patient as presenting: (i) remission, (ii) mild, or (iii) moderate/severe disease activity. Derivation of the SLE-DAS cut-offs for disease activity categories was performed using ROC curve analysis against this expert clinical classification. Performance of these SLE-DAS categories of disease activity was assessed as compared with: (i) expert classification (in Cochin cohort); (ii) British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) index (in BLISS-76). An index-based and a Boolean definition of remission were tested applying decision trees, using CHAID (chi-square automatic interaction detection) algorithm and their performance estimated.

Results:

We included 1190 SLE patients (221 in Padova, 150 in Cochin and 819 from BLISS-76 cohorts). In the derivation cohort, best SLE-DAS cut-off values for disease activity categories were: (i) remission, SLE-DAS≤2.08; (ii) mild activity, 2.08<SLE-DAS≤7.10; (iii) moderate/severe activity, SLE-DAS>7.10. Table 1 shows the performance of these SLE-DAS cut-offs. The SLE-DAS Boolean-based definition of remission (all SLE-DAS clinical items scores = 0 and prednisone ≤5mg/day) showed sensitivity and specificity of 100% in the derivation (Padova) and validation (Cochin) clinical cohorts. The SLE-DAS index-based definition of remission (SLE-DAS ≤2.08 and prednisone ≤5mg/day) presented sensitivity =100% and specificity =97.4% in the derivation and validation clinical cohorts. The SLE-DAS definitions of remission were fully substantiated by CHAID.

Table 1.

Performance of SLE-DAS cut-offs for remission and disease activity categories compared to physician’s classification and BILAG (n =1190).

Disease activity categorySensitivity (%)Specificity (%)Accuracy (%)DerivationPadova CohortRemission(SLE-DAS≤2.08)99.397.198.6Mild Disease Activity(2.08<SLE-DAS≤7.10)74.298.995.5Moderate and Severe Disease Activity(SLE-DAS>7.10)97.496.796.8ValidationCochin CohortRemission(SLE-DAS≤2.08)99.193.998.0Mild Disease Activity(2.08<SLE-DAS≤7.10)82.699.296.7Moderate and Severe Disease Activity(SLE-DAS>7.10)100.098.698.7ValidationBLISS-76Remission and Mild Disease Activity§vs. Moderate and Severe Disease Activity§§ (SLE-DAS≤7.10 vs. >7.10)91.484.190.8

§ Remission/Mild: No BILAG B or A scores

§§ Moderate/severe: ≥1 BILAG B or A scores

Conclusion:

The SLE-DAS is an accurate and easy to use tool for defining clinical remission state and SLE disease activity categories, validated with both the expert assessment and BILAG.

References:

[1]Jesus D, et al. Derivation and validation of the SLE Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS): a new SLE continuous measure with high sensitivity for changes in disease activity. Ann Rheum Dis 2019;78:365-71.

Acknowledgements:

The authors would like to thank GlaxoSmithKline (Uxbridge, UK) for granting access to the data from the BLISS-76 trial through the Clinical Study Data Request consortium.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

SLE-DAS in the First Trimester of Gestation Predicts Maternal Lupus Flares Later in Pregnancy

Introduction: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) mainly occurs during childbearing age. Remission or low disease activity state (LDAS) before conception are recommended by experts to achieve a favourable lupus pregnancy outcome but little is known on the best way to evaluate remission or activity status during pregnancy. Objectives: We tested SLE-disease activity score (SLE-DAS) in the first trimester as predictor of maternal flares and obstetrical complications in 2nd and 3rd trimester in a cohort of SLE pregnant women. Patients and Methods: Inclusion criteria were: 1) women ≥ 18 years; 2) affected with SLE (SLICC 2012); 3) enrolled in two referral centers (Italy and France) 4) with an ongoing singleton pregnancy at 12 weeks (only one pregnancy per patient). Disease activity was assessed at first trimester of pregnancy, using SLE-pregnancy disease activity index (SLEPDAI) and retrospectively applying SLE-DAS. Maternal lupus flares at 2nd and 3rd trimester were defined by the SELENA-SLEDAI Flare Index (SFI). Adverse pregnancy outcome (APO) included: fetal and neonatal death, placental insufficiency with premature delivery <37 weeks, and small for gestational age (SGA) (≤3rd percentile). Results: We included 158 pregnant patients affected with SLE. At first trimester the median SLEPDAI (IQR) was 2 (0-4) and the median SLE-DAS (IQR) 1.32 (0.37-2.08). At least one flare occurred in 25 (15.8%) women during the 2nd and 3rd trimester. APO occurred in 19 (12.0%) patients. A significant correlation between SLE-DAS and SLEPDAI was found in this cohort (Spearman's ρ = 0.97, Figure 1). At multivariate analysis, both SLE-DAS and SLEPDAI predicted maternal flares (adjOR = 1.2; 95% CI = 1.0-1.3, p = 0.02; adjOR 1.3, 95% CI = 1.1-1.6 per unit increase, p = 0.01, respectively). SLE-DAS and SLEPDAI were associated with APO at univariate analysis (p = 0.02). Conclusions: SLE-DAS was highly correlated with SLEPDAI and its use in the first trimester predicted maternal flares in the 2nd and 3rd trimester, making SLE-DAS a reliable instrument to measure SLE activity during pregnancy.

Is the intima-media thickness of temporal and axillary arteries influenced by cardiovascular risk?

Objectives

To measure with US the intima-media thickness (IMT) of temporal (superficial, parietal and frontal branches) and axillary arteries in subjects without a diagnosis of GCA and/or PMR with different cardiovascular (CV) risk; and to assess the performance of previously proposed cut-off values for normal IMT.

Methods

Subjects ≥ 50 years without a diagnosis of GCA or PMR were included. Bilateral US of the temporal arteries, including the frontal and parietal branches, and axillary arteries was performed by two sonographers using a 10–22 MHz and 6–18 MHz probe. The following previously proposed cut-offs were considered: superficial temporal artery: 0.42 mm; frontal branch: 0.34 mm; parietal branch: 0.29 mm; axillary artery: 1.0 mm.

Results

A total of 808 arteries in 101 subjects were evaluated; of these, 31 (30.7%) were classified as very high CV risk, seven (6.9%) as high, 34 (33.7%) as moderate and 29 (28.7%) as low risk. Subjects with very high or high risk showed higher IMT than those with moderate or low risk in the superficial temporal arteries [0.23 (s.d. 0.07) vs 0.20 (s.d. 0.04), P &lt; 0.01] and in the axillary arteries [0.54 (s.d. 0.17) vs 0.48 (s.d. 0.10), P = 0.002]. The IMT was higher than the reference cut-off in 13/808 (1.6%) arteries, in ≥1 artery in 10/101 subjects (10.1%). Of these 10 subjects, 8 (80%) were classified as having very high or high risk.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that CV risk might influence the US-determined IMT of the temporal and axillary arteries in subjects without GCA. Therefore, in patients with suspected GCA, particular attention should be paid when measuring the IMT in those patients with very high/high CV risk.

OP0092 OPTIMIZING A DEFINITION OF LUPUS LOW DISEASE ACTIVITY STATE (LDA) FOR DAILY CLINICAL PRACTICE: SLE-DAS LDA VS LLDAS

Background:

The Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS)[1] is a proposed target for the management of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). However, the LLDAS definition is cumbersome to apply, as it requires comparison with manifestations in the previous visit, scoring of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus disease activity index (SLEDAI), Physician Global Assessment (PGA), treatment conditions and exclusion of additional features. The SLE disease activity score (SLE-DAS)[2] is a validated continuous measure with higher sensitivity to change and validity in predicting damage accrual as compared to SLEDAI-2K. SLE-DAS is quickly quantified with its online calculator. The SLE-DAS low disease activity (SLE-DAS LDA) was recently defined [3] and it is easier to apply than the LLDAS.

Objectives:

To compare the performance of SLE-DAS and LLDAS for defining LDA state in a real-life clinical setting.

Methods:

Cross-sectional study of SLE patients fulfilling ACR’97 and/or SLICC’12 classification criteria followed at an academic lupus clinic, from January to December 2019. Fulfillment of LLDAS and SLE-DAS LDA state was verified for each patient. The SLE-DAS LDA state was defined as (1) SLE-DAS ≤3.77[3] with (2) prednisolone dose ≤7.5 mg/day. The proportion of cases in LDA state using LLDAS and SLE-DAS LDA was compared with McNemar’s test. Agreement between LLDAS and SLE-DAS LDA was tested with Cohen’s Kappa coefficient.

Results:

We included 292 patients (86.6% female, mean age: 48.7±14.4 years, mean disease duration: 14.4±9.3 years). From these, 245 (83.9%) and 248 (85%) were in LDA according to LLDAS and SLE-DAS LDA, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between LLDAS and SLE-DAS LDA (p=0.581 regarding the identification of patients in LDA. Agreement between these two sets of criteria was almost perfect (k=0.831, p<0.01).

There were 13 discordant cases, fulfilling only the SLE-DAS LDA (n=8) or the LLDAS (n=5), and their manifestations of disease activity (excluding serologic features) are summarized in table 1.

Patients fulfilling only SLE-DAS LDANumber of casesPGA (range)Active clinical manifestations (range)SLEDAI-2K (range)SLE-DAS (range)Prednisolone (range, mg/day)60.1-0.2Leukopenia 2.2-2.7x10^9/L1-31.46-3.030-2.520.2-0.3Thrombocytopenia 71-96x10^9/L1-31.97-2.860-5Patients fulfilling only LLDASNumber of casesPGA(range)Active clinical manifestations(range)SLEDAI-2K(range)SLE-DAS(range)Prednisolone(range, mg/day)20.2-0.4Arthritis (2-4/28 swollen joints)44,41-5.310-510.5Panniculitis (face and torso)35,53010.1Generalized rash45,01510.4Leukopenia 2.1x10^9/L Thrombocytopenia 62x10^9/L24,990

Conclusion:

A LDA state, by either definition, was achieved by most patients in this real-life setting. LLDAS and SLE-DAS LDA identify almost exactly the same population. The SLE-DAS LDA definition is easier to apply and hence might be the optimal definition for use in daily clinical practice.

References:

[1]Franklyn K, Lau CS, Navarra SV, et al.Definition and initial validation of a Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS). Ann Rheum Dis 2016; 75: 1615-21.

[2]Jesus D, Matos A, Henriques C, et al.Derivation and validation of the SLE Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS): a new SLE continuous measure with high sensitivity for changes in disease activity. Ann Rheum Dis 2019; 78: 365-71.

[3]Jesus D, Matos A, Henriques C, et al.The SLE Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS) enables accurate definitions of SLE remission and LDA as achievable targets in disease management. Ann Rheum Dis 2019; 78: 411-2.

Disclosure of Interests:

Helena Assunção: None declared, Diogo Jesus: None declared, José Antonio P. da Silva Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Abbvie, Consultant of: Pfizer, AbbVie, Roche, Lilly, Novartis, Luís Inês: None declared

How normal is the enthesis by ultrasound in healthy subjects?

OBJECTIVES

To explore the prevalence of the ultrasound (US) findings of enthesitis in a group of healthy subjects.

METHODS

US assessments of quadriceps, patellar and Achilles tendons, and plantar fascia entheses were performed by a rheumatologist on 82 healthy volunteers focusing on the US findings indicative of "active" inflammation according to the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) definitions.

RESULTS

Eight hundred and twenty entheses were evaluated in 82 healthy subjects. One or more US findings of "active" inflammation were found in at least one enthesis in 30 out of 82 subjects (34.1%), in 69 out of 820 entheses (8.4%). Entheseal thickening, hypoechogenicity and PD signal were respectively found in at least one enthesis in 23 (28.0%), 11 (13.4%) and 8 (9.8%) out of 82 subjects. Among the 69 entheses showing US features of "active" inflammation, entheseal thickening, hypoechogenicity and PD signal were found as isolated in 61 entheses and in combination in the remaining 8 (entheseal thickening and hypoechogenicity).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show a relatively high prevalence of US findings of "active" inflammation at the lower limb entheses in a group of healthy subjects, thus questioning the discriminant power of the OMERACT definitions for the diagnosis of "active" enthesitis. A combination of grey-scale and PD findings at a specific threshold to be defined could improve both the reliability and clinical usefulness of US.

Performance of SLEDAI-2K to detect a clinically meaningful change in SLE disease activity: a 36-month prospective cohort study of 334 patients

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this paper is to evaluate the performance of the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI-2K) in detecting clinically meaningful changes in SLE disease activity.

METHODS

A longitudinal cohort study was conducted of 334 SLE patients during a 36-month follow-up. At each outpatient visit, disease activity was scored using the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) and SLEDAI-2K. Correlations between PGA and SLEDAI-2K were assessed. A clinically meaningful change in SLE disease activity was defined as a ΔPGA ≥ 0.3 points from baseline. Performance of SLEDAI-2K in detecting a clinically meaningful worsening or improvement was tested using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS

Adjusted mean PGA and SLEDAI-2K scores presented a high correlation (rho = 0.824, p < 0.0005). In ROC analysis, a SLEDAI-2K variation presented an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.697 (95% confidence interval (CI) (0.628-0.766), p < 0.0005) to detect a clinically meaningful improvement, with a sensitivity of 28.8% for a SLEDAI-2K ≥ 4 reduction. The AUC to detect a clinically meaningful worsening was 0.877 (95% CI (0.822-0.932), p < 0.0005), with a sensitivity of 35.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

SLEDAI-2K has a limited ability to detect clinically meaningful changes in SLE disease activity, failing to identify almost two-thirds of cases judged as having a clinically meaningful improvement or worsening. There is a need for more sensitive SLE disease activity measures in clinical practice and research.

IL-12 and IL-23/Th17 axis in systemic lupus erythematosus

IMPACT STATEMENT

Our article is focused on emerging pathogenetic pathways in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Notably, IL-12 and IL-23 have been described as emerging cytokines in SLE pathogenesis. We know that IL-23 stimulates Th17 cells to produce IL-17. We try to point out the importance of IL-23/Th17 axis in SLE and to focus on the interaction between this axis and IL-12. Ustekinumab, a fully human IgG1κ monoclonal antibody directed towards the p40 shared subunit of IL-12 and IL-23, has been recently investigated in SLE, suggesting a potential novel therapeutic strategy in SLE. To our knowledge, there are no reviews which simultaneously focus on IL-12 an IL-23/Th17 axis in SLE. Thus, we believe our work will be of interest to the readers.

Derivation and validation of the SLE Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS): a new SLE continuous measure with high sensitivity for changes in disease activity

OBJECTIVES

To derive and validate a new disease activity measure for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), the SLE Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS), with improved sensitivity to change as compared with SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI), while maintaining high specificity and easiness of use.

METHODS

We studied 520 patients with SLE from two tertiary care centres (derivation and validation cohorts). At each visit, disease activity was scored using the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) and SLEDAI 2000 (SLEDAI-2K). To construct the SLE-DAS, we applied multivariate linear regression analysis in the derivation cohort, with PGA as dependent variable. The formula was validated in a different cohort through the study of: (1) correlations between SLE-DAS, PGA and SLEDAI-2K; (2) performance of SLEDAI-2K and SLE-DAS in identifying a clinically meaningful change in disease activity (ΔPGA≥0.3); and (3) accuracy of SLEDAI-2K and SLE-DAS time-adjusted means in predicting damage accrual.

RESULTS

The final SLE-DAS instrument included 17 items. SLE-DAS was highly correlated with PGA (r=0.875, p<0.0005) and SLEDAI-2K (r=0.943, p<0.0005) in the validation cohort. The optimal discriminative ΔSLE-DAS cut-off to detect a clinically meaningful change was 1.72. In the validation cohort, SLE-DAS showed a higher sensitivity than SLEDAI-2K (change ≥4) to detect a clinically meaningful improvement (89.5% vs 47.4%, p=0.008) or worsening (95.5% vs 59.1%, p=0.008), while maintaining similar specificities. SLE-DAS performed better in predicting damage accrual than SLEDAI-2K.

CONCLUSION

SLE-DAS has a good construct validity and has better performance than SLEDAI-2K in identifying clinically significant changes in disease activity and in predicting damage accrual.

Multitarget therapy of mycophenolate mofetil and cyclosporine A for induction treatment of refractory lupus nephritis

Standard induction therapy for lupus nephritis (LN) with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or cyclophosphamide (CYC) is often ineffective. Evidence on rescue induction regimens is scarce. We analyzed efficacy and tolerability of multitarget immunosuppression with MMF and cyclosporine A (CsA) as induction treatment for LN (class III/IV/V) refractory to CYC and/or MMF. We included all six refractory LN patients (class IV = 3, class V = 2, class III = 1) from our 400-patient tertiary Lupus Clinic observed between 2012 and 2015. Four patients had previously received pulse CYC. All six received MMF as first or second induction therapy and CsA was added once failure to reach remission was established. Daily dose of MMF was 2–3 g and CsA was dosed up to 2.6–3.7 mg/kg/day. Mean proteinuria was reduced from 2407 mg/24 hours at the start of the MMF+CsA regimen to 544 mg/day after six months. The mean prednisolone dose was reduced from 17.5 to 6 mg/day after six months of MMF+CsA. Four patients achieved a complete renal response, one patient had a partial renal response and one failed to respond. None of the patients presented with adverse events. These data suggest that adding CsA to MMF can induce complete remission of refractory LN and is well tolerated.

The Portuguese Society of Rheumatology position paper on the use of biosimilars - 2017 update

Biosimilars are new and more affordable similar versions of previously approved reference biological drugs. Following the approval of the first monoclonal antibody biosimilar in 2013, the Portuguese Society of Rheumatology issued a position paper on the use of biosimilars in rheumatic conditions covering efficacy, safety, extrapolation, interchangeability, substitution and pharmacovigilance. However, as this is a rapidly evolving field, it was felt that the knowledge and evidence gathered since then justified an update of these statements. Literature searches on these issues were performed and the search results were presented and discussed in a national meeting. Portuguese rheumatologists considered that affordability should be taken into consideration when initiating a biological drug, but other factors were equally important. In patients already on reference biological treatment, switch to a more affordable biosimilar is desirable, provided a set of conditions is rigorously met. Automatic substitution is not acceptable and current evidence is insufficient to support interchangeability. Extrapolation of clinical indications is endorsed by Portuguese rheumatologists, and the statements on safety, pharmacovigilance and traceability are in accordance with the previous position paper.

Central nervous system vasculitis in systemic lupus erythematosus: a case series report in a tertiary referral centre

Central nervous system (CNS) vasculitis (CNS) in systemic erythematosus lupus (SLE) is a rare and challenging diagnosis. We report four cases of CNS vasculitis that occurred 5 to 16 years after the diagnosis of SLE. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) detected different features suggestive of CNS vasculitis: enhancement and thickening of the vascular wall, vascular stenosis, ischemic brain lesions and intracerebral haemorrhage unlikely to correspond to other mimic aetiologies. Three patients received combination therapy with glucocorticoids (GC) and cyclophosphamide (CYC). Intravenous human immunoglobulin (IVIG) was administered when the patient had a past history of serious adverse event to CYC or high infectious risk. All patients showed imagiological improvement, at least partially, 5 to 23 days after starting treatment. We discuss the management of CNS in SLE including the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Clinical features and long-term outcomes of systemic lupus erythematosus: comparative data of childhood, adult and late-onset disease in a national register

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) affects predominantly women at reproductive age but may present at any age. Age at disease onset has a modulating effect on presentation and course of disease, but controversies persist regarding its impact on long-term outcome. Our aims were to characterize clinical features, co-morbidities and cumulative damage in childhood-onset, adult-onset and late-onset SLE. Patients with childhood-onset SLE fulfilling ACR 1997 criteria were identified in a nationwide register-Reuma.pt/SLE (N = 89) and compared with adult-onset and late-onset counterparts matched 1:1:1 for disease duration. 267 SLE patients with mean disease duration of 11.9 ± 9.3 years were analyzed. Skin (62 %), kidney (58 %), neurological (11 %) and hematologic involvement (76 %) were significantly more common in childhood-onset SLE and disease activity was higher in this subset than in adult- and late-onset disease (SLEDAI-2K 3.4 ± 3.8 vs. 2.2 ± 2.7 vs. 1.6 ± 2.8, respectively; p = 0.004). Also, more childhood-onset patients received cyclophosphamide (10 %) and mycophenolate mofetil (34 %). A greater proportion of women (96 %), prevalence of arthritis (89 %) and anti-SSA antibodies (34 %) were noted in the adult-onset group. There was a significant delay in the diagnosis of SLE in older ages. Co-morbidities such as hypertension, diabetes and thyroid disease were significantly more frequent in late-onset SLE, as well as the presence of irreversible damage evaluated by the SLICC/ACR damage index (20 vs. 26 vs. 40 %; p < 0.001). Greater organ involvement as well as the frequent need for immunosuppressants supports the concept of childhood-onset being a more severe disease. In contrast, disease onset is more indolent but co-morbidity burden and irreversible damage are greater in late-onset SLE, which may have implications for patients' management.