1
|
Markov AM, Krutilova P, Cedeno AE, McGill JB, McKee AM. Interruption of Continuous Glucose Monitoring: Frequency and Adverse Consequences. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2024; 18:1096-1101. [PMID: 36824046 DOI: 10.1177/19322968231156572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Removal of diabetes devices, including insulin pumps and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), is a common practice due to hospital policies, interference with imaging studies, medications, and surgical interventions. Furthermore, these devices are inherently prone to malfunction, adhesive failure, and issues with insertion that can lead to a reduction in wear time. Prescription and dispensing practices provide an exact number of sensors per month without redundancy to account for the realities of daily CGM use. METHODS A RedCap survey was completed by adult patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes (T1D or T2D) who utilize CGM followed in the Diabetes Center at Washington University in St Louis. RESULTS Of 384 surveys sent, 99 were completed. Participants had a mean age of 54 years, T1D 69%, female 70%, White 96%, non-Hispanic 96%, and a mean duration of diabetes mellitus (DM) 28 years. Of the cohort, 100% used CGM (80.2% Dexcom, 13.5% Freestyle Libre, 6.3% Medtronic), 61% insulin pump, and 41% Hybrid closed-loop (HCL) systems. CGM-related disruption events included device malfunction (in 85.4% of participants), insertion problems (63.5%), and falling off (61.4%). Medical care-related disruption occurred most frequently in the setting of imaging (41.7%), followed by surgery/procedures (11.7%) and hospitalization (4.4%). Adverse glycemic events attributed to CGM disruption, including hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia, occurred ≥4 times in 36.5% and 12.4% of the cohort, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Disruption in CGM use is common. Lack of redundancy of CGM supplies contributes to care disruption and adverse glycemic events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander M Markov
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism & Lipid Research, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Petra Krutilova
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism & Lipid Research, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Andrea E Cedeno
- Northwestern Medicine Regional Medical Group, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Janet B McGill
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism & Lipid Research, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Alexis M McKee
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism & Lipid Research, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rajan N, Duggan EW, Abdelmalak BB, Butz S, Rodriguez LV, Vann MA, Joshi GP. Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia Updated Consensus Statement on Perioperative Blood Glucose Management in Adult Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Undergoing Ambulatory Surgery. Anesth Analg 2024; 139:459-477. [PMID: 38517760 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000006791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
This consensus statement is a comprehensive update of the 2010 Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia (SAMBA) Consensus Statement on perioperative blood glucose management in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) undergoing ambulatory surgery. Since the original consensus guidelines in 2010, several novel therapeutic interventions have been introduced to treat DM, including new hypoglycemic agents and increasing prevalence of insulin pumps and continuous glucose monitors. The updated recommendations were developed by an expert task force under the provision of SAMBA and are based on a comprehensive review of the literature from 1980 to 2022. The task force included SAMBA members with expertise on this topic and those contributing to the primary literature regarding the management of DM in the perioperative period. The recommendations encompass preoperative evaluation of patients with DM presenting for ambulatory surgery, management of preoperative oral hypoglycemic agents and home insulins, intraoperative testing and treatment modalities, and blood glucose management in the postanesthesia care unit and transition to home after surgery. High-quality evidence pertaining to perioperative blood glucose management in patients with DM undergoing ambulatory surgery remains sparse. Recommendations are therefore based on recent guidelines and available literature, including general glucose management in patients with DM, data from inpatient surgical populations, drug pharmacology, and emerging treatment data. Areas in need of further research are also identified. Importantly, the benefits and risks of interventions and clinical practice information were considered to ensure that the recommendations maintain patient safety and are clinically valid and useful in the ambulatory setting. What Other Guidelines Are Available on This Topic? Since the publication of the SAMBA Consensus Statement for perioperative blood glucose management in the ambulatory setting in 2010, several recent guidelines have been issued by the American Diabetes Association (ADA), the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE), the Endocrine Society, the Centre for Perioperative Care (CPOC), and the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland (AAGBI) on DM care in hospitalized patients; however, none are specific to ambulatory surgery. How Does This Guideline Differ From the Previous Guidelines? Previously posed clinical questions that were outdated were revised to reflect current clinical practice. Additional questions were developed relating to the perioperative management of patients with DM to include the newer therapeutic interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niraja Rajan
- From the Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Penn State Health, Hershey Outpatient Surgery Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Elizabeth W Duggan
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Basem B Abdelmalak
- Departments of General Anesthesiology and Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Anesthesia for Bronchoscopic Surgery, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Steven Butz
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pediatric Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Children's Wisconsin Surgicenter, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Leopoldo V Rodriguez
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Boulder Valley Anesthesiology PLLC, UCHealth Longs Peak Hospital and Surgery Center, Boulder Community Health, Foothills Hospital, Boulder, Colorado
| | - Mary Ann Vann
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Girish P Joshi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zeng J, Kosak T, Malkani S, Hudson JC, Martin NE, Tishler RB, Pashtan IM. Management of Continuous Glucose Monitors in Radiation Oncology Patients. Pract Radiat Oncol 2024:S1879-8500(24)00195-4. [PMID: 39142390 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2024.06.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2024] [Revised: 05/17/2024] [Accepted: 06/07/2024] [Indexed: 08/16/2024]
Abstract
Continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) are an increasingly prevalent electronic medical device used by patients with diabetes, offering several advantages over "finger sticks." There is a resulting rise in patients with CGMs seen in radiation oncology clinics. Manufacturers specify that CGMs should not be exposed to radiation (both diagnostic and therapeutic) due to the risk of device damage, creating challenges for patients and providers. We present a workflow for the management of CGMs in radiation oncology patients, beginning with systematic screening by providers and staff. We propose options for CGM management together with the device prescriber, including removal of the CGM or keeping it in place with periodic finger sticks to confirm the accuracy and offer guidance to radiation oncology providers and staff.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johnathan Zeng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tara Kosak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Samir Malkani
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolism, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - Julie C Hudson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Neil E Martin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Roy B Tishler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Itai M Pashtan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Spanakis EK, Cook CB, Kulasa K, Aloi JA, Bally L, Davis G, Dungan KM, Galindo RJ, Mendez CE, Pasquel FJ, Shah VN, Umpierrez GE, Aaron RE, Tian T, Yeung AM, Huang J, Klonoff DC. A Consensus Statement for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Metrics for Inpatient Clinical Trials. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2023; 17:1527-1552. [PMID: 37592726 PMCID: PMC10658683 DOI: 10.1177/19322968231191104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/19/2023]
Abstract
Diabetes Technology Society organized an expert consensus panel to develop metrics for research in the use of continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) in a hospital setting. The experts met virtually in small groups both before and after an April 13, 2023 virtual meeting of the entire panel. The goal of the panel was to develop consensus definitions in anticipation of greater use of CGMs in hospital settings in the future. Establishment of consensus definitions of inpatient analytical metrics will be easier to compare outcomes between studies. Panelists defined terms related to 10 dimensions of measurements related to the use of CGMs including (1) hospital hypoglycemia, (2) hospital hyperglycemia, (3) hospital time in range, (4) hospital glycemic variability, (5) hospital glycemia risk index, (6) accuracy of CGM devices and reference methods for CGMs in the hospital, (7) meaningful time blocks for hospital glycemic goals, (8) hospital CGM data sufficiency, (9) using CGM data for insulin dosing, and (10) miscellaneous factors. The panelists voted on 51 proposed recommendations. Based on the panel vote, 51 recommendations were classified as either strong (43) or mild (8). Additional research is needed on CGM performance in the hospital. This consensus report is intended to support that type of research intended to improve outcomes for hospitalized people with diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elias K. Spanakis
- Baltimore VA Medical Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Curtiss B. Cook
- Division of Endocrinology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Kristen Kulasa
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Joseph A. Aloi
- Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Lia Bally
- Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology, Nutritional Medicine and Metabolism, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Georgia Davis
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Kathleen M. Dungan
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | | | | | - Viral N. Shah
- Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | | | | | - Tiffany Tian
- Diabetes Technology Society, Burlingame, CA, USA
| | | | | | - David C. Klonoff
- Diabetes Research Institute, Mills-Peninsula Medical Center, San Mateo, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bellido V, Freckman G, Pérez A, Galindo RJ. Accuracy and Potential Interferences of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Sensors in the Hospital. Endocr Pract 2023; 29:919-927. [PMID: 37369291 DOI: 10.1016/j.eprac.2023.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Revised: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023]
Abstract
For years, the standard of care for monitoring dysglycemia in hospitalized patients was capillary blood glucose (CBG) testing with point-of-care glucose meters. Recently, there has been a revolution in novel factory-calibrated continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems. Newer CGMs are smaller and less expensive, have improved accuracy and longer wear time, and do not require fingerstick CBG for calibration, resulting in increased utilization in ambulatory settings. Consequently, hospitals have noticed increased usability of CGMs among hospitalized patients and expect a progressive continued increase. During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a critical need for innovative approaches to glycemic monitoring, with several pilot implementation projects using CGM in the intensive care unit and non-intensive care unit settings, further boosting the evidence in this area. Hence, recent guidelines have provided recommendations for the use of CGM in specific hospital scenarios and highlighted the potential of CGM to overcome CBG limitations for glucose monitoring in the inpatient setting. In this review, we provide the following: 1) an up-to-date review of the accuracy of the newer CGMs in hospitalized patients, 2) a discussion of standards for CGM accuracy metrics, 3) a contemporary overview of potential interferences that may cause inaccuracies or poor CGM performance, and 4) required steps for full regulatory approval of CGMs in the hospital and future research steps to advance the field forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Virginia Bellido
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBiS), Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Guido Freckman
- Institut für Diabetes-Technologie, Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Antonio Pérez
- Servicio de Endocrinología y Nutrición. Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, IIB Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. CIBER de Diabetes y Enfermedades Metabólicas Asociadas (CIBERDEM), Barcelona, España
| | - Rodolfo J Galindo
- University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Miami, Florida.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zelada H, Perez-Guzman MC, Chernavvsky DR, Galindo RJ. Continuous glucose monitoring for inpatient diabetes management: an update on current evidence and practice. Endocr Connect 2023; 12:e230180. [PMID: 37578799 PMCID: PMC10563639 DOI: 10.1530/ec-23-0180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Abstract
Over the last few years, several exciting changes in continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) technology have expanded its use and made CGM the standard of care for patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes using insulin therapy. Consequently, hospitals started to notice increased use of these devices in their hospitalized patients. Furthermore during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID) pandemic, there was a critical need for innovative approaches to glycemic monitoring, and several hospitals started to implement CGM protocols in their daily practice. Subsequently, a plethora of studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of CGM use in the hospital, leading to clinical practice guideline recommendations. Several studies have also suggested that CGM has the potential to become the standard of care for some hospitalized patients, overcoming the limitations of current capillary glucose testing. Albeit, there is a need for more studies and particularly regulatory approval. In this review, we provide a historical overview of the evolution of glycemic monitoring in the hospital and review the current evidence, implementation protocols, and guidance for the use of CGM in hospitalized patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry Zelada
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | | | - Daniel R Chernavvsky
- Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Rodolfo J Galindo
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine. Miami, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hanley M, Ryan DT, Kyle E, Kavanagh EC. Radiographic appearances of a continuous glucose monitor in a patient with lipodystrophy. Radiol Case Rep 2023; 18:3287-3290. [PMID: 37520385 PMCID: PMC10375375 DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2023.06.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2023] [Revised: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023] Open
Abstract
We report the case of a 50-year old woman with a known history of lipodystrophy. A pelvic radiograph was taken for the investigation of right hip pain. The image shown demonstrates an indeterminate artefact projected over the right iliac fossa. A previous CT renal study was reviewed, demonstrating the same device in the subcutaneous tissues of the contralateral left lower quadrant which on close inspection was consistent with a continuous glucose monitoring device. Features of lipodystrophy were also noted on review of the CT imaging. Although many devices such as vagal stimulators and prosthetic valves are easily recognized by radiologists on radiographic images, they may be less familiar with devices such as continuous glucose monitors. The aim of this case report is to familiarize radiologists with the appearances of continuous glucose monitors to allow for effective reporting.
Collapse
|
8
|
Guerrero-Arroyo L, Faulds E, Perez-Guzman MC, Davis GM, Dungan K, Pasquel FJ. Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Intensive Care Unit. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2023; 17:667-678. [PMID: 37081830 PMCID: PMC10210113 DOI: 10.1177/19322968231169522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/22/2023]
Abstract
Traditionally, the care of critically ill patients with diabetes or stress hyperglycemia in the intensive care unit (ICU) demands the use of continuous intravenous insulin (CII) therapy to achieve narrow glycemic targets. To reduce the risk of iatrogenic hypoglycemia and to achieve glycemic targets during CII, healthcare providers (HCP) rely on hourly point-of-care (POC) arterial or capillary glucose tests obtained with glucose monitors. The burden of this approach, however, was evident during the beginning of the pandemic when the immediate reduction in close contact interactions between HCP and patients with COVID-19 was necessary to avoid potentially life-threatening exposures. Taking advantage of the advancements in current diabetes technologies, including continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices integrated with digital health tools for remote monitoring, HCP implemented novel protocols in the ICU to care for patients with COVID-19 and hyperglycemia. We provide an overview of research conducted in the ICU setting with the use of initial CGM technology to current devices and summarize our recent experience in the ICU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lizda Guerrero-Arroyo
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes,
and Metabolism, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Eileen Faulds
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and
Metabolism, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - M. Citlalli Perez-Guzman
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes,
and Metabolism, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Georgia M. Davis
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes,
and Metabolism, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Kathleen Dungan
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and
Metabolism, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Francisco J. Pasquel
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes,
and Metabolism, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Clubbs Coldron B, Coates V, Khamis A, MacRury S. Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Non-ICU Hospital Settings for People With Diabetes: A Scoping Review of Emerging Benefits and Issues. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2023; 17:467-473. [PMID: 34696622 PMCID: PMC10012381 DOI: 10.1177/19322968211053652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence indicates that poor glycemic control is associated with increased morbidity and length of stay in hospital. There are a wide range of guidelines published, which seek to ensure safe and effective inpatient glycemic control in the hospital setting. However, the implementation of these protocols is limited in practice. In particular, the feasibility of "flash" and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) remains untested on general wards. METHOD Scoping Review. RESULTS If used in the general ward hospital settings, CGM and flash glucose monitoring (FGM) systems could lead to improved glycemic control, decreased length of stay, and reduced risk of severe hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia. Potential problems include lack of experience with this technology and costs of sensors. Rapid analysis of glucose measurements can facilitate clinical decision making and therapy adjustment in the hospital setting. In addition, people with diabetes may be empowered to better self-manage their condition in hospital as they have direct access to their glucose data. CONCLUSIONS More studies are required in which the feasibility, benefits and limitations of FGM and CGM in non-intensive care unit hospital settings are elucidated. We need evidence on which types of hospital wards might benefit from the introduction of this technology and the contexts in which they are less useful. We also need to identify the types of people who are most likely to find FGM and CGM useful for self-management and for which populations they have the most benefit in terms of clinical outcomes and length of stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Clubbs Coldron
- Division of Rural Health and
Wellbeing, Centre for Health Science, University of Highlands and Islands,
Inverness, UK
| | - Vivien Coates
- School of Nursing, Ulster
University, Derry, UK
- Western Health and Social Care
Trust, Altnagelvin Area Hospital, Londonderry, UK
| | - Amjed Khamis
- Letterkenny University Hospital,
Letterkenny, Ireland
| | - Sandra MacRury
- Division of Rural Health and
Wellbeing, Centre for Health Science, University of Highlands and Islands,
Inverness, UK
- Raigmore Hospital, Inverness,
UK
- Sandra MacRury, MBChB, FRCP, MD,
Division of Rural Health and Wellbeing, Centre for Health Science,
University of Highlands and Islands, Old Perth Road, Inverness IV2
3JH, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sherr JL, Heinemann L, Fleming GA, Bergenstal RM, Bruttomesso D, Hanaire H, Holl RW, Petrie JR, Peters AL, Evans M. Automated insulin delivery: benefits, challenges, and recommendations. A Consensus Report of the Joint Diabetes Technology Working Group of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes and the American Diabetes Association. Diabetologia 2023; 66:3-22. [PMID: 36198829 PMCID: PMC9534591 DOI: 10.1007/s00125-022-05744-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
A technological solution for the management of diabetes in people who require intensive insulin therapy has been sought for decades. The last 10 years have seen substantial growth in devices that can be integrated into clinical care. Driven by the availability of reliable systems for continuous glucose monitoring, we have entered an era in which insulin delivery through insulin pumps can be modulated based on sensor glucose data. Over the past few years, regulatory approval of the first automated insulin delivery (AID) systems has been granted, and these systems have been adopted into clinical care. Additionally, a community of people living with type 1 diabetes has created its own systems using a do-it-yourself approach by using products commercialised for independent use. With several AID systems in development, some of which are anticipated to be granted regulatory approval in the near future, the joint Diabetes Technology Working Group of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes and the American Diabetes Association has created this consensus report. We provide a review of the current landscape of AID systems, with a particular focus on their safety. We conclude with a series of recommended targeted actions. This is the fourth in a series of reports issued by this working group. The working group was jointly commissioned by the executives of both organisations to write the first statement on insulin pumps, which was published in 2015. The original authoring group was comprised by three nominated members of the American Diabetes Association and three nominated members of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Additional authors have been added to the group to increase diversity and range of expertise. Each organisation has provided a similar internal review process for each manuscript prior to submission for editorial review by the two journals. Harmonisation of editorial and substantial modifications has occurred at both levels. The members of the group have selected the subject of each statement and submitted the selection to both organisations for confirmation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Richard M Bergenstal
- International Diabetes Center and HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Daniela Bruttomesso
- Unit of Metabolic Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Hélène Hanaire
- Department of Diabetology, University Hospital of Toulouse, University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Reinhard W Holl
- Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Central Institute of Biomedical Engineering (ZIBMT), University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
- German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), Munich-Neuherberg, Germany
| | - John R Petrie
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Anne L Peters
- Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Mark Evans
- Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Galindo RJ, de Boer IH, Neumiller JJ, Tuttle KR. Continuous Glucose Monitoring to Optimize Management of Diabetes in Patients with Advanced CKD. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2023; 18:130-145. [PMID: 36719162 PMCID: PMC10101590 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.04510422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Treatment of patients with diabetes and CKD includes optimizing glycemic control using lifestyle modifications and drugs that safely control glycemia and improve clinical kidney and cardiovascular disease outcomes. However, patients with advanced CKD, defined as eGFR <30 ml/min per 1.73 m2 or kidney disease treated with dialysis, have limitations to the use of some preferred glucose-lowering medications, are often treated with insulin, and experience high rates of severe hypoglycemia. Moreover, hemoglobin A1c accuracy decreases as GFR deteriorates. Hence, there is a need for better glycemic monitoring tools. Continuous glucose monitoring allows for 24-hour glycemic monitoring to understand patterns and the effects of lifestyle and medications. Real-time continuous glucose monitoring can be used to guide the administration of insulin and noninsulin therapies. Continuous glucose monitoring can overcome the limitations of self-monitored capillary glucose testing and hemoglobin A1c and has been shown to prevent hypoglycemic excursions in some populations. More data are needed to understand whether similar benefits can be obtained for patients with diabetes and advanced CKD. This review provides an updated approach to management of glycemia in advanced CKD, focusing on the role of continuous glucose monitoring in this high-risk population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodolfo J. Galindo
- Division of Endocrinology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Ian H. de Boer
- Division of Nephrology and Kidney Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Joshua J. Neumiller
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Washington State University, Spokane, Washington
| | - Katherine R. Tuttle
- Nephrology Division, Kidney Research Institute and Institute of Translational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- Providence Medical Research Center, Providence Health Care, Spokane, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sherr JL, Heinemann L, Fleming GA, Bergenstal RM, Bruttomesso D, Hanaire H, Holl RW, Petrie JR, Peters AL, Evans M. Automated Insulin Delivery: Benefits, Challenges, and Recommendations. A Consensus Report of the Joint Diabetes Technology Working Group of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes and the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 2022; 45:3058-3074. [PMID: 36202061 DOI: 10.2337/dci22-0018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
A technological solution for the management of diabetes in people who require intensive insulin therapy has been sought for decades. The last 10 years have seen substantial growth in devices that can be integrated into clinical care. Driven by the availability of reliable systems for continuous glucose monitoring, we have entered an era in which insulin delivery through insulin pumps can be modulated based on sensor glucose data. Over the past few years, regulatory approval of the first automated insulin delivery (AID) systems has been granted, and these systems have been adopted into clinical care. Additionally, a community of people living with type 1 diabetes has created its own systems using a do-it-yourself approach by using products commercialized for independent use. With several AID systems in development, some of which are anticipated to be granted regulatory approval in the near future, the joint Diabetes Technology Working Group of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes and the American Diabetes Association has created this consensus report. We provide a review of the current landscape of AID systems, with a particular focus on their safety. We conclude with a series of recommended targeted actions. This is the fourth in a series of reports issued by this working group. The working group was jointly commissioned by the executives of both organizations to write the first statement on insulin pumps, which was published in 2015. The original authoring group was comprised by three nominated members of the American Diabetes Association and three nominated members of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Additional authors have been added to the group to increase diversity and range of expertise. Each organization has provided a similar internal review process for each manuscript prior to submission for editorial review by the two journals. Harmonization of editorial and substantial modifications has occurred at both levels. The members of the group have selected the subject of each statement and submitted the selection to both organizations for confirmation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Daniela Bruttomesso
- Unit of Metabolic Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Hélène Hanaire
- Department of Diabetology, University Hospital of Toulouse, University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Reinhard W Holl
- Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Central Institute of Biomedical Engineering (ZIBMT), University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.,German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), Munich-Neuherberg, Germany
| | - John R Petrie
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, U.K
| | - Anne L Peters
- Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Mark Evans
- Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Avari P, Lumb A, Flanagan D, Rayman G, Misra S, Dhatariya K, Choudhary P. Continuous Glucose Monitoring Within Hospital: A Scoping Review and Summary of Guidelines From the Joint British Diabetes Societies for Inpatient Care. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2022; 17:611-624. [PMID: 36444418 DOI: 10.1177/19322968221137338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Increasing numbers of people, particularly with type 1 diabetes (T1D), are using wearable technologies. That is, continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) pumps, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems, and hybrid closed-loop systems, which combine both these elements. Given over a quarter of all people admitted to hospital have diabetes, there is a need for clinical guidelines for when people using them are admitted to hospital. The Joint British Diabetes Societies for Inpatient Care (JBDS-IP) provide a scoping review and summary of guidelines on the use of diabetes technology in people with diabetes admitted to hospital.JBDS-IP advocates enabling people who can self-manage and use their own diabetes technology to continue doing so as they would do out of hospital. Whilst people with diabetes are recommended to achieve a target of 70% time within range (3.9-10.0 mmol/L [70-180 mg/dL]), this can be very difficult to achieve whilst unwell. We therefore recommend targeting hypoglycemia prevention as a priority, keeping time below 3.9 mmol/L (70 mg/dL) at < 1%, being aware of looming hypoglycemia if glucose is between 4.0 and 5.9 mmol/L (72-106 mg/dL), and consider intervening, particularly if there is a downward CGM trend arrow.Health care organizations need clear local policies and guidance to support individuals using diabetes technologies, and ensure the relevant workforce is capable and skilled enough to ensure their safe use within the hospital setting. The current set of guidelines is divided into two parts. Part 1, which follows below, outlines the guidance for use of CGM in hospital. The second part outlines guidance for use of CSII and hybrid closed-loop in hospital.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parizad Avari
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Alistair Lumb
- Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Daniel Flanagan
- Department of Endocrinology, University Hospital Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Gerry Rayman
- Ipswich Diabetes Centre, East Suffolk and North East Essex Foundation Trust, Ipswich, UK
| | - Shivani Misra
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Ketan Dhatariya
- Elsie Bertram Diabetes Centre, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
| | - Pratik Choudhary
- Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Longo RR, Joshi R. The Devil Is in the Details: Use, Limitations, and Implementation of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Inpatient Setting. Diabetes Spectr 2022; 35:405-419. [PMID: 36561647 PMCID: PMC9668728 DOI: 10.2337/dsi22-0009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Until recently, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems were reserved for use in the outpatient setting or for investigational purposes in hospitalized patients. However, during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, use of CGM in the inpatient setting has grown rapidly. This review outlines important details related to the accuracy, limitations, and implementation of, as well as necessary staff education for, inpatient CGM use and offers a glimpse into the future of CGM in the inpatient setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Rick Longo
- Lahey Hospital and Medical Center–Beth Israel Lahey Health, Burlington, MA
| | - Renu Joshi
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Harrisburg, PA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Buschur EO, Faulds E, Dungan K. CGM in the Hospital: Is It Ready for Prime Time? Curr Diab Rep 2022; 22:451-460. [PMID: 35796882 PMCID: PMC9261155 DOI: 10.1007/s11892-022-01484-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in the hospital setting is growing with more patients using these devices at home and when admitted to the hospital, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. RECENT FINDINGS Historically, most evidence for CGM use in the inpatient setting was limited to small studies utilizing outdated CGM technology and analyzing accuracy of sensor measurements. Previous studies have shown reduced sensor accuracy during extreme hypo- or hyperglycemia, rapid fluctuations of glucose, compression of the sensor itself, and in those who are critically ill. Studies that are more recent have shown CGM to have adequate accuracy and may be effective in reducing hypoglycemia in hospitalized patients; some studies have also showed improvement in time in target glycemic range. Furthermore, CGM may reduce nursing workload, cost of inpatient care, and use of personal protective equipment and face-to-face patient care especially for patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. This review will describe the evidence for use of CGM in hospitalized critically ill or non-critically ill patients, address accuracy and safety considerations, and outline paths for future implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth O. Buschur
- grid.261331.40000 0001 2285 7943Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, 5th Floor McCampbell Hall, 1581 Dodd Drive, Columbus, OH 43210-1296 USA
| | - Eileen Faulds
- grid.261331.40000 0001 2285 7943Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, 5th Floor McCampbell Hall, 1581 Dodd Drive, Columbus, OH 43210-1296 USA
- grid.261331.40000 0001 2285 7943The Ohio State University College of Nursing, Columbus, OH USA
| | - Kathleen Dungan
- grid.261331.40000 0001 2285 7943Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, 5th Floor McCampbell Hall, 1581 Dodd Drive, Columbus, OH 43210-1296 USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gothong C, Singh LG, Satyarengga M, Spanakis EK. Continuous glucose monitoring in the hospital: an update in the era of COVID-19. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 2022; 29:1-9. [PMID: 34845159 PMCID: PMC8711300 DOI: 10.1097/med.0000000000000693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems are Food and Drug Administration approved devices for the ambulatory setting; however, they remain investigational systems for inpatient use. This review summarizes the most recent and relevant literature on the use of continuous glucose monitoring in the hospital setting. RECENT FINDINGS CGM provides real-time glucose data that enable healthcare professionals to make proactive and timelier clinical decisions with regards to diabetes management. CGM devices appear to be safe and accurate systems for glucose monitoring in the hospital setting. Real-time CGM systems and glucose telemetry can decrease hypoglycemia and reduce hyperglycemia in hospitalized patients with diabetes. Remote glucose monitoring decreases the need of frequent Point-of-care checks and personal protective equipment use while also mitigating staff exposure risk which is timely in the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic. Although most nursing staff have limited exposure and training on CGM technology, early studies show that CGM use in the hospital is well received by nurses. SUMMARY Given the evidence in the current literature regarding CGM use in the hospital, CGM devices may be incorporated in the inpatient setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chikara Gothong
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Nutrition, University of Maryland School of Medicine
| | - Lakshmi G. Singh
- Division of Endocrinology, Baltimore Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Baltimore
| | - Medha Satyarengga
- Center for Diabetes and Endocrinology, University of Maryland Shore Regional Health, Easton, Maryland, USA
| | - Elias K. Spanakis
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Nutrition, University of Maryland School of Medicine
- Division of Endocrinology, Baltimore Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Baltimore
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bailey TS, Alva S. Landscape of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) and Integrated CGM: Accuracy Considerations. Diabetes Technol Ther 2021; 23:S5-S11. [PMID: 34546084 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2021.0236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Continuous glucose monitoring devices have significantly improved in many respects compared with earlier versions. As sensor accuracy improved, U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved a nonadjunctive indication for use that no longer required confirmatory blood glucose monitoring. This article discusses the performance characteristics and regulatory classifications for the current systems that are relevant to informed clinical decision-making.
Collapse
|
18
|
Shang T, Zhang JY, Bequette BW, Raymond JK, Coté G, Sherr JL, Castle J, Pickup J, Pavlovic Y, Espinoza J, Messer LH, Heise T, Mendez CE, Kim S, Ginsberg BH, Masharani U, Galindo RJ, Klonoff DC. Diabetes Technology Meeting 2020. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2021; 15:916-960. [PMID: 34196228 PMCID: PMC8258529 DOI: 10.1177/19322968211016480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Diabetes Technology Society hosted its annual Diabetes Technology Meeting on November 12 to November 14, 2020. This meeting brought together speakers to cover various perspectives about the field of diabetes technology. The meeting topics included artificial intelligence, digital health, telemedicine, glucose monitoring, regulatory trends, metrics for expressing glycemia, pharmaceuticals, automated insulin delivery systems, novel insulins, metrics for diabetes monitoring, and discriminatory aspects of diabetes technology. A live demonstration was presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trisha Shang
- Diabetes Technology Society, Burlingame, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Jennifer K. Raymond
- Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Gerard Coté
- Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Juan Espinoza
- Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Sarah Kim
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Umesh Masharani
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Perez-Guzman MC, Shang T, Zhang JY, Jornsay D, Klonoff DC. Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Hospital. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) 2021; 36:240-255. [PMID: 33789033 PMCID: PMC8090458 DOI: 10.3803/enm.2021.201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 02/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) have suddenly become part of routine care in many hospitals. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has necessitated the use of new technologies and new processes to care for hospitalized patients, including diabetes patients. The use of CGMs to automatically and remotely supplement or replace assisted monitoring of blood glucose by bedside nurses can decrease: the amount of necessary nursing exposure to COVID-19 patients with diabetes; the amount of time required for obtaining blood glucose measurements, and the amount of personal protective equipment necessary for interacting with patients during the blood glucose testing. The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is now exercising enforcement discretion and not objecting to certain factory-calibrated CGMs being used in a hospital setting, both to facilitate patient care and to obtain performance data that can be used for future regulatory submissions. CGMs can be used in the hospital to decrease the frequency of fingerstick point of care capillary blood glucose testing, decrease hyperglycemic episodes, and decrease hypoglycemic episodes. Most of the research on CGMs in the hospital has focused on their accuracy and only recently outcomes data has been reported. A hospital CGM program requires cooperation of physicians, bedside nurses, diabetes educators, and hospital administrators to appropriately select and manage patients. Processes for collecting, reviewing, storing, and responding to CGM data must be established for such a program to be successful. CGM technology is advancing and we expect that CGMs will be increasingly used in the hospital for patients with diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. Citlalli Perez-Guzman
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Lipids, Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA,
USA
| | - Trisha Shang
- Diabetes Technology Society, Burlingame, CA,
USA
| | | | - Donna Jornsay
- Diabetes Program, Mills-Peninsula Medical Center, Burlingame, CA,
USA
| | - David C. Klonoff
- Diabetes Research Institute, Mills-Peninsula Medical Center, San Mateo, CA,
USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Pasquel FJ, Lansang MC, Dhatariya K, Umpierrez GE. Management of diabetes and hyperglycaemia in the hospital. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2021; 9:174-188. [PMID: 33515493 PMCID: PMC10423081 DOI: 10.1016/s2213-8587(20)30381-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 122] [Impact Index Per Article: 40.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2020] [Revised: 10/25/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Hyperglycaemia in people with and without diabetes admitted to the hospital is associated with a substantial increase in morbidity, mortality, and health-care costs. Professional societies have recommended insulin therapy as the cornerstone of inpatient pharmacological management. Intravenous insulin therapy is the treatment of choice in the critical care setting. In non-intensive care settings, several insulin protocols have been proposed to manage patients with hyperglycaemia; however, meta-analyses comparing different treatment regimens have not clearly endorsed the benefits of any particular strategy. Clinical guidelines recommend stopping oral antidiabetes drugs during hospitalisation; however, in some countries continuation of oral antidiabetes drugs is commonplace in some patients with type 2 diabetes admitted to hospital, and findings from clinical trials have suggested that non-insulin drugs, alone or in combination with basal insulin, can be used to achieve appropriate glycaemic control in selected populations. Advances in diabetes technology are revolutionising day-to-day diabetes care and work is ongoing to implement these technologies (ie, continuous glucose monitoring, automated insulin delivery) for inpatient care. Additionally, transformations in care have occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic, including the use of remote inpatient diabetes management-research is needed to assess the effects of such adaptations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco J Pasquel
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| | - M Cecilia Lansang
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Ketan Dhatariya
- Elsie Bertram Diabetes Centre, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
| | - Guillermo E Umpierrez
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Galindo RJ, Aleppo G. Continuous glucose monitoring: The achievement of 100 years of innovation in diabetes technology. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2020; 170:108502. [PMID: 33065179 PMCID: PMC7736459 DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Monitoring of glucose levels is essential to effective diabetes management. Over the past 100 years, there have been numerous innovations in glucose monitoring methods. The most recent advances have centered on continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) technologies. Numerous studies have demonstrated that use of continuous glucose monitoring confers significant glycemic benefits on individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Ongoing improvements in accuracy and convenience of CGM devices have prompted increasing adoption of this technology. The development of standardized metrics for assessing CGM data has greatly improved and streamlined analysis and interpretation, enabling clinicians and patients to make more informed therapy modifications. However, many clinicians many be unfamiliar with current CGM and how use of these devices may help individuals with T1DM and T2DM achieve their glycemic targets. The purpose of this review is to present an overview of current CGM systems and provide guidance to clinicians for initiating and utilizing CGM in their practice settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodolfo J Galindo
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Lipids, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, 69 Jesse Hill Jr. Dr., Glenn Building, Suite 202, Atlanta, GA, 30303, USA.
| | - Grazia Aleppo
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Molecular Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 645 N. Michigan Ave, Suite 530, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Galindo RJ, Umpierrez GE, Rushakoff RJ, Basu A, Lohnes S, Nichols JH, Spanakis EK, Espinoza J, Palermo NE, Awadjie DG, Bak L, Buckingham B, Cook CB, Freckmann G, Heinemann L, Hovorka R, Mathioudakis N, Newman T, O’Neal DN, Rickert M, Sacks DB, Seley JJ, Wallia A, Shang T, Zhang JY, Han J, Klonoff DC. Continuous Glucose Monitors and Automated Insulin Dosing Systems in the Hospital Consensus Guideline. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2020; 14:1035-1064. [PMID: 32985262 PMCID: PMC7645140 DOI: 10.1177/1932296820954163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
This article is the work product of the Continuous Glucose Monitor and Automated Insulin Dosing Systems in the Hospital Consensus Guideline Panel, which was organized by Diabetes Technology Society and met virtually on April 23, 2020. The guideline panel consisted of 24 international experts in the use of continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) and automated insulin dosing (AID) systems representing adult endocrinology, pediatric endocrinology, obstetrics and gynecology, advanced practice nursing, diabetes care and education, clinical chemistry, bioengineering, and product liability law. The panelists reviewed the medical literature pertaining to five topics: (1) continuation of home CGMs after hospitalization, (2) initiation of CGMs in the hospital, (3) continuation of AID systems in the hospital, (4) logistics and hands-on care of hospitalized patients using CGMs and AID systems, and (5) data management of CGMs and AID systems in the hospital. The panelists then developed three types of recommendations for each topic, including clinical practice (to use the technology optimally), research (to improve the safety and effectiveness of the technology), and hospital policies (to build an environment for facilitating use of these devices) for each of the five topics. The panelists voted on 78 proposed recommendations. Based on the panel vote, 77 recommendations were classified as either strong or mild. One recommendation failed to reach consensus. Additional research is needed on CGMs and AID systems in the hospital setting regarding device accuracy, practices for deployment, data management, and achievable outcomes. This guideline is intended to support these technologies for the management of hospitalized patients with diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Ananda Basu
- University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Suzanne Lohnes
- University of California San Diego Medical Center, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | | | - Elias K. Spanakis
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Division of Endocrinology, Baltimore Veterans Affairs Medical Center, MD, USA
| | | | - Nadine E. Palermo
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Tonya Newman
- Neal, Gerber and Eisenberg LLP, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - David N. O’Neal
- University of Melbourne Department of Medicine, St. Vincent’s Hospital, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Amisha Wallia
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Trisha Shang
- Diabetes Technology Society, Burlingame, CA, USA
| | | | - Julia Han
- Diabetes Technology Society, Burlingame, CA, USA
| | - David C. Klonoff
- Mills-Peninsula Medical Center, San Mateo, CA, USA
- David C. Klonoff, MD, FACP, FRCP (Edin), Fellow AIMBE, Mills-Peninsula Medical Center, 100 South San Mateo Drive Room 5147, San Mateo, CA 94401, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Galindo RJ, Aleppo G, Klonoff DC, Spanakis EK, Agarwal S, Vellanki P, Olson DE, Umpierrez GE, Davis GM, Pasquel FJ. Implementation of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Hospital: Emergent Considerations for Remote Glucose Monitoring During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2020; 14:822-832. [PMID: 32536205 PMCID: PMC7673156 DOI: 10.1177/1932296820932903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has become a widely used tool in the ambulatory setting for monitoring glucose levels, as well as detecting uncontrolled hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, and glycemic variability. The accuracy of some CGM systems has recently improved to the point of manufacture with factory calibration and Food and Drug Administration clearance for nonadjunctive use to dose insulin. In this commentary, we analyze the answers to six questions about what is needed to bring CGM into the hospital as a reliable, safe, and effective tool. The evidence to date indicates that CGM offers promise as an effective tool for monitoring hospitalized patients. During the current coronavirus disease 2019 crisis, we hope to provide guidance to healthcare professionals, who are seeking to reduce exposure to SARS-Cov-2, as well as preserve invaluable personal protective equipment. In this commentary, we address who, what, where, when, why, and how CGM can be adopted for inpatient use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodolfo J. Galindo
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Lipids, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Grazia Aleppo
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Molecular Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - David C. Klonoff
- Diabetes Research Institute, Mills-Peninsula Medical Center, San Mateo, CA, USA
| | - Elias K. Spanakis
- Division of Endocrinology, Baltimore Veterans Affairs Medical Center, MD, USA
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Nutrition, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - Shivani Agarwal
- Fleischer Institute for Diabetes and Metabolism, NY-Regional Center for Diabetes Translational Research, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Priya Vellanki
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Lipids, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Darin E. Olson
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Lipids, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Division of Endocrinology, Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, GA, USA
| | - Guillermo E. Umpierrez
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Lipids, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Georgia M. Davis
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Lipids, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Francisco J. Pasquel
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Lipids, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|