Rehabilitation Principles to Consider for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair

Prehabilitation prior to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is a safe and effective intervention for short- to long-term benefits: A systematic review

PURPOSE

Comprehensively explore current practices in preoperative rehabilitation (prehabilitation) for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and assess corresponding clinical outcomes and complication rates.

METHODS

A systematic search of EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane and PubMed was conducted from inception to 1 November 2024. All studies reporting outcomes and/or complications following prehabilitation and ACLR were included. Screening and data abstraction were designed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Revised Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews guidelines.

RESULTS

Thirty-six studies with 2326 patients undergoing prehabilitation and ACLR were included. Weighted averages of all clinical outcomes met or surpassed patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) thresholds and return to sports (RTS) criteria. There were no preoperative complications following prehabilitation. Major post-operative complications included graft failure (4.6%), contralateral ACL rupture (1.0%), surgical site infection (0.6%), deep infection (0.4%), non-ACL ligament injury (0.5%), reoperation for hardware removal (0.3%), muscle rupture (0.1%), patellar subluxation (0.1%) and patellar rupture (0.1%).

CONCLUSION

Current prehabilitation practices for ACLR emphasize impairment resolution, ROM restoration, and neuromuscular exercises. Safety of current practices is supported by the absence of preoperative complications and similar post-operative complication rates compared to patients undergoing standard care. Clinical outcomes of patients undergoing prehabilitation were shown to meet and surpass PASS thresholds and RTS criteria, expedite post-operative recovery, and maintain functional improvements up to 10 years post-operation, suggesting that prehabilitation is a safe and effective intervention yielding short- to long-term benefits. There is a need for further high-quality randomized controlled trials and large prospective cohort studies comparing the effect of prehabilitation on post-operative outcomes, reporting specific exercise details and protocol progression.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Combining a digital health application with standard care significantly enhances rehabilitation outcomes for ACL surgery patients

INTRODUCTION

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is one of the most common sports injuries. Regardless of the surgical treatment, patients require intensive education about the pathology, therapeutic options and physical therapy. However, it is often not possible for the patient to start physical therapy directly and schedule adequate consultations. Digital health applications are medical devices that can help bridge the gap between physiotherapy sessions and provide qualified, convenient and effective education and treatment. This study is needed to explore alternative methods to ensure continuous and effective rehabilitation for ACL patients who face delays in accessing traditional physiotherapy. The study aimed to compare app-assisted therapy plus standard of care (conventional orthopaedic and physiotherapeutic measures) versus isolated standard of care for patients with planned ACL surgery.

METHODS

A monocentric, two-arm, 1:1 randomized controlled study examined 80 patients after a cruciate ligament rupture with or without meniscal injury. Patients over 18 years with a confirmed diagnosis of ACL rupture and planned surgical reconstruction using autologous grafts were included. The study criteria additionally included willingness to use the Orthopy app and sufficient German language proficiency. The study excluded patients with severe concomitant injuries, prior knee surgeries, chronic pain conditions and those not compatible with app usage. Patients were randomized and their baseline data (t0) was collected. Subsequently, they received their treatment according to their treatment group. The study included a presurgery period (2-6 weeks) and a postsurgery period (14 weeks). Interim assessments were done via online questionnaires at t1 (if more than 3 weeks before surgery) and t3, t4 and t5 (postsurgery). Additional clinical assessments were conducted at t2 (presurgery) and t6 (14 weeks postsurgery). Primary outcome measures included the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), with subjective pain and function levels (numeric rating scale [NRS]) as secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

The clinical trial was able to show positive outcomes on the KOOS Pain and Symptoms subscale of the primary endpoint KOOS in the interventional group compared to the standard of care group. A statistically significant pain reduction could be seen at t1 (p = 0.0005), t2 (p = 0.0068) and t4 (approximately 6 weeks after surgery; p = 0.01). A significant reduction of symptoms at t1 (p = 0.0001), t2 (p = 0.0036) and t6 (p = 0.0377) were recognized. These findings are further supported by the significant benefit of the pain NRS at t4 and positive tendencies at t3, t5 and t6. The KOOS subscales quality of life (p = 0.0066), activities of daily living (p = 0.0009) and Sport (p = 0.0484) showed significant effects before surgery.

CONCLUSION

The Orthopy app is a medical device that is both safe and effective for use. Combining the Orthopy app and standard of care can significantly improve prehabilitation and rehabilitation in surgical treatment with ACL reconstruction compared with the isolated standard of care.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I.

Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Primary Repair With Suture Combined With Femoral Double Bone Tunnel Suspension Fixation

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is a common orthopaedic sports injury. Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is the gold standard for treatment. In recent years, with the popularization and precision of arthroscopic techniques, as well as the discovery that acute ACL rupture has the potential to heal itself, arthroscopic ACL primary repair has become an alternative surgical treatment. This Technical Note describes an arthroscopic ACL primary repair with suture combined with femoral double bone tunnel suspension fixation. It tightens the tendon-bone contact, increases the contact area, and strengthens the fixation, all of which contribute to better tendon-bone healing. Thus, this can be used as a surgical method for ACL repair.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair Results in Similar Patient-Reported Outcome Measures as Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Prospective Comparative Studies

PURPOSE

To investigate the patient-reported outcomes (PROs), knee stability, and complications in prospective comparative studies of patients undergoing augmented anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair compared with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

METHODS

A literature search was performed according to the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Human clinical studies of Level I-II evidence comparing PROs, knee stability, and complications after ACL repair and reconstruction were included, and a qualitative analysis was performed. Excluded studies included those lacking reporting outcomes, studies that performed open ACLR or repair, studies published before the year 2000, and studies with evidence Levels III-IV. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool.

RESULTS

Seven Level I-II studies were retained, comprising 190 ACLR and 221 repairs (75 bridge-enhanced ACL repair [BEAR], 49 suture augmentation [SA], and 97 dynamic intraligamentary stabilization [DIS]). At final follow-up, re-rupture rates varied between 0 and 14% (BEAR) versus 0 and 6% (ACLR) and mean side-to-side differences measured using KT-1000 testing ranged from 1.6 to 1.9 mm (BEAR) versus 1.7 to 3.14 mm (ACLR). For DIS versus ACLR, mean anterior tibial translation values at final follow-up were 1.7 mm (DIS) versus 1.4 mm (ACLR), and re-rupture rates ranged from 20.8% to 29% (DIS) versus 17% to 27.2% (ACLR). For SA versus ACLR, the mean side-to-side difference ranged from 0.2 to 0.39 mm (SA) versus 0.33 to 0.4 mm (ALCR), whereas the re-rupture rates were 10% (SA) versus 0% (ACLR). International Knee Documentation Committee, Tegner, Lysholm, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome scores across both cohorts exhibited statistically significant, and comparable improvement, from baseline to final follow-up ranging from 1 to 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Augmented ACL repair results in similar patient-reported outcome measures in comparison with ACLR. However, augmented ACL repair may be associated with greater rates of failure, given re-rupture rates of up to 14%, 29%, and 10% for BEAR, DIS, and SA, respectively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, systematic review of Level I-II studies.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Young Athletes: A Comprehensive Review of Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Techniques

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are prevalent among young athletes and pose significant challenges due to their impact on immediate and long-term knee function. Traditional ACL reconstruction techniques, while effective, may not always meet the unique needs of this population, particularly given their high physical demands and the risk of future complications. This review evaluates two advanced surgical techniques - lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LEAT) and anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction - as potential enhancements to conventional ACL reconstruction. LEAT involves augmenting knee stability by addressing lateral compartment issues, while ALL reconstruction focuses on reconstructing the ALL to improve overall knee function. The review compares these techniques regarding surgical procedures, clinical outcomes, biomechanical effectiveness, and complications. LEAT and ALL reconstruction are examined for their impact on recovery, return-to-sport rates, and long-term knee health, highlighting their advantages and limitations. Findings suggest that both techniques offer promising benefits, with the potential for improved outcomes compared to traditional methods. However, the effectiveness of each technique can vary based on individual factors and the specific demands of different sports. Further research is needed to fully understand the long-term implications and refine these approaches. This review aims to guide clinical decision-making and optimize treatment strategies for young athletes with ACL injuries, enhancing their prospects for a successful return to athletic activity.

Acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture: can repair become an alternative to reconstruction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies

PURPOSE

To perform a meta-analysis to compare clinical outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair and ACL reconstruction for acute ACL rupture.

METHOD

We searched Pubmed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases to seek relevant studies. Clinical outcomes included failure rate, hardware removal rate, anteroposterior (AP) knee laxity, and patient-reported outcomes. In addition, subgroup analysis was carried out according to repair techniques, rupture locations, and study designs. Funnel plots were used to detect publication bias. All statistical analysis was performed using STATA (version 14.2, StataCorp).

RESULTS

A total of 10 articles were included in this study, comprising 5 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 5 cohort studies, involving a total of 549 patients. We found no statistical differences between the ACL repair and ACL reconstruction in the following outcomes: failure rate, AP knee laxity, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome (KOOS) Score, and Tegner score. However, the ACL repair group had a higher hardware removal rate. Except for AP knee laxity results on different repair techniques, there was no statistical difference in other subgroup analyses.

CONCLUSION

Compared with ACL reconstruction, ACL repair shows similar results in clinical outcomes, and it is promising to be an effective alternative treatment for acute ACL rupture. Larger samples and higher-quality studies are needed to support our results and further explore the advantages of ACL repair in other aspects.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Rehabilitation Following ACL Repair with Internal Brace Ligament Augmentation in Female Gymnast: A Resident's Case Report

Introduction

Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injuries continue to be a major source of morbidity in gymnastics. The gold standard is to perform an ACL Reconstruction (ACLR). However, injuries to the proximal femoral attachment of the ACL have demonstrated an ability to regenerate. An alternative surgical intervention to the ACLR in this ACL tear subgroup is an ACL repair. The purpose of this case report is to provide a rehabilitation progression for a female gymnast after an ACL repair with Internal Brace Ligament Augmentation (IBLA).

Case Description

The subject was a 16-year-old female who presented with a Sherman Type 1 proximal avulsion of her ACL. She underwent an ACL repair with IBLA. Physical therapy interventions followed a sequential and multi-phased approach based on time for tissue physiologic healing and individual progression. Patient reported outcomes including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI) and the Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome Yellow Flag (OSPRO-YF) were assessed in conjunction with isokinetic strength and hop performance testing to determine return to sport readiness.

Outcomes

The subject completed 42 sessions over the course of 26 weeks in addition to a home exercise program. At return to sport, clinically meaningful improvement was observed in patient reported outcomes including the IKDC, ACL-RSI, and OSPRO-YF. Additionally, strength and hop performance surpassed established thresholds of clinical significance. The subject returned to sport at six months post-operatively.

Conclusion

The subject in this case report returned to full participation in gymnastics six months after an ACL repair with internal bracing following a sequential and multi-phased rehabilitation. The primary ACL repair with IBLA appeared beneficial to this patient and could benefit from additional study in other athletes and athletic populations.

Level of Evidence

Level 5.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture Combined with Complete Radial Tear of the Posterior Horn of the Lateral Meniscus: Suture or Resection?

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture often presents with a tear of the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus. There is no clear preference between ACL reconstruction with suture and resection of the meniscus. We aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of ACL reconstruction with suture versus resection in patients presenting with arthroscopic ACL rupture and radial complete tear of the posterior corner of the lateral meniscus. We retrospectively analyzed 157 patients with ACL rupture and complete radial tear of the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus. Between May 2010 and April 2015, 86 of 157 patients underwent ACL reconstruction and meniscus suture (study group, 54.78%) and 71 of 157 patients underwent ACL reconstruction and meniscus resection (control group, 45.22%) in our department. All patients were monitored over the 12 to 72-month follow-up period. The primary evaluation indices were the Lysholm scores, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, pivot shift test, the Barret criteria, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of meniscal healing. The majority of 157 patients were relatively young men (29.64 ± 7.79 years) with low body mass index (BMI) (23.79 ± 2.74). The postoperative Lysholm and IKDC scores of the two groups were significantly improved over the corresponding preoperative scores (p < 0.05). The clinical results and excellent and good rates were significantly better for the study group than for the control group (both, p < 0.05). MRI showed that the meniscal healed rate of the study group was 96.51%. There was no significant difference in BMI between subgroups for any functional outcome. For patients with ACL rupture and complete radial tear of the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus, ACL reconstruction and both simultaneous suture and resection of the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus were found to be safe and effective. There was no association between outcomes and BMI. However, the former was associated with a superior long-term clinical effect and may restore the integrity of the meniscus and is particularly recommended for young patients.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair Using a Re-tensionable All-Suture Construct

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are among the most common injuries to the knee. With recent improvements in imaging that allow for more precise identification of ACL tear patterns, improved techniques for repair, and advancements in biological augmentation, there has been a re-emerging interest in primary ACL repair, especially for acute proximal ACL tears. This article aims to describe a surgical technique for primary ACL repair using a re-tensionable all-suture-based construct.

Psychosocial interventions seem redact kinesiophobia after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction but higher level of evidence is needed: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Psychosocial interventions have shown potential in reducing the fear of re-injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), but this has not been systematically reviewed. The aim of this study was to assess the available evidence on the effect of psychosocial interventions on kinesiophobia after ACLR.

METHODS

Two independent researchers conducted a systematic search in the electronic databases including Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science (WOS), SPORTDiscus, PsycINFO, and CINAHL from their inception until May 2022. They included studies that utilised a randomised controlled study design with a control group, and measured kinesiophobia using the Tampa Scale for kinesiophobia in patients who underwent primary ACLR. The outcome of interest was the mean and standard deviation of kinesiophobia. Extracted data were analysed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software, version 3.0 (CMA.V2), employing a random-effects model to calculate the overall effect estimates of psychosocial interventions on Kinesiophobia. The standardised mean difference with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was computed based on the mean and standard deviation in each group.

RESULTS

This systematic review and meta-analysis included 5 randomised controlled trials with a total of 213 patients who underwent ACLR. The results of the meta-analysis showed that psychosocial intervention was more effective than non-psychosocial comparators in reducing kinesiophobia among patients who underwent a primary ACLR (5 trials, MD 0.56, 95% CI 0.28-0.83, p < 0.001). The heterogeneity score was zero (I2 = 0%; n.s. for Cochran's Q test), indicating no significant variation among the studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Psychosocial interventions can alleviate kinesiophobia in patients with primary ACLR. Although the limited number of reviewed studies and their methodological limitations precludes drawing a definitive conclusion regarding the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions on kinesiophobia, these promising findings can serve as a basis for developing psychological strategies to manage kinesiophobia in patients with primary ACLR and can also guide future research this issue.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial is registered in PROSPERO on December 2021 (CRD42021282413).

Primary anterior cruciate ligament repair: Current concepts

The renewed interest in ACL repair over the last two decades stems from advances in modern arthroscopic techniques and clinical studies that have provided evidence that the ACL can reliably heal, and patients can return to sport at a comparable rate to ACL reconstruction patients. The ability to maintain and utilize native ACL tissue, with proprioceptive capabilities, and the smaller drill tunnels needed to repair an ACL leads to an overall less invasive procedure and improved early rehabilitation. Additionally, repair avoids a variety of comorbidities associated with autograft harvest. This current concept review details modern techniques of ACL repair and their current studies, a review on the use of biologic enhancement in ACL repair, and other considerations to appropriately integrate ACL repair into the sports medicine orthopaedic surgeon's practice.

Effects of step lengths on biomechanical characteristics of lower extremity during split squat movement

Objective: To quantify the effects of increasing the step length of the split squat on changes in kinematics, kinetics, and muscle activation of the lower extremity. Methods: Twenty male college students participated in the test (age: 23.9 ± 3.7, height: 175.1 ± 4.9). Data on kinematics, kinetics, and EMG were collected during split squat exercise at four different step lengths in a non-systematic manner. One-way repeated measurements ANOVA were used to compare characteristic variables of peak angle, moment, and RMS among the four step length conditions. Results: The step length significantly changes the peak angles of the hip (p = 0.011), knee (p = 0.001), ankle (p < 0.001) joint, and the peak extension moment of the hip (p < 0.001), knee (p = 0.002) joint, but does not affect the ankle peak extension moment (p = 0.357) during a split squat. Moreover, a significant difference was observed in the EMG of gluteus maximus (p < 0.001), vastus medialis (p = 0.013), vastus lateralis (p = 0.020), biceps femoris (p = 0.003), Semitendinosus (p < 0.001), medialis gastrocnemius (p = 0.035) and lateralis gastrocnemius (p = 0.005) during four step lengths, but no difference in rectus femoris (p = 0.16). Conclusion: Increases in step length of split squat had a greater activation on the hip extensor muscles while having a limited impact on the knee extensor muscles. The ROM, joint moment, and muscle activation of the lead limb in the split squat all should be considered in cases of individual preventative or rehabilitative prescription of the exercise. Moreover, the optimal step length for strength training in healthy adults appears to be more suitable when it is equal to the length of the individual lower extremity.

Nordic hamstring exercises in functional knee rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomised, controlled study

To study the effect of using Nordic hamstring exercise method on muscle strength and knee joint stability of patients after ACL reconstruction. 60 patients admitted to our hospital for ACL reconstruction were randomly divided into a test group (n = 30, applying Nordic hamstring exercise) and a control group (n = 30, applying conventional rehabilitation training methods), and the difference in the circumference of the thighs of the patients in the two groups was analysed after training, and the peak torque (PT), total torque (PT), and flexion and extension strength were measured by using the Biodex system3 Multi-joint Isokinetic Testing System at knee joints with an angular velocity of 60°/s and 120°/s. The peak torque (PT), total work (TW), and average peak torque (AVG PT) were measured by extension and flexion strength at angular velocity, and the Lysholm Knee Score was used to assess the knee function of 60 patients. There was no difference in the difference in thigh circumference between the two groups before surgery (P > 0.05); the difference in thigh circumference between the patients in the test group at 12 and 24 weeks after surgery was (- 0.35 ± 0.22) cm and (0.12 ± 0.03) cm, respectively, which were higher than those in the control group, (- 0.51 ± 0.15) cm and (- 0.41 ± 0.34) cm (P < 0.05). At the 12th and 24th postoperative weeks, the popliteal muscle strength of both groups was improved compared with that before surgery; among them, by comparing the popliteal peak moments with different angular velocities, the ratio of popliteal peak moment on the affected side/peak moment on the healthy side of the popliteal muscle of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group, and the difference was significant (P < 0.05), but there was still a gap compared with that of the healthy side. The Lachmen test and the anterior drawer test were negative in the test and control groups at the 24th postoperative week of review, and the anterior tibial shift was < 5 mm in the KT-1000 test, and the difference in the anterior shift was < 3 mm compared with the healthy side, and there was no significant difference between the two groups. By Nordic hamstring exercise can make patients after knee ACL reconstruction reduce patient pain, accelerate the recovery of knee function, improve the swelling of the lower limb, reach the level of flexor strength of the healthy side within 24 weeks, and can increase the stability of the knee joint.