The Perimensical Capsule: Potential Supporting Structure Surrounding Meniscus

The biomechanical properties of human menisci: A systematic review

Biomechanical characterization of meniscal tissue ex vivo remains a critical need, particularly for the development of suitable meniscus replacements or therapeutic strategies that target the native mechanical properties of the meniscus. To date, a huge variety of test configurations and protocols have been reported, making it extremely difficult to compare the respective outcome parameters, thereby leading to misinterpretation. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review was to identify test-specific parameters that contribute to uncertainties in the determination of mechanical properties of the human meniscus and its attachments, which derived from common quasi-static and dynamic tests in tension, compression, and shear. Strong evidence was found that the determined biomechanical properties vary significantly depending on the specific test parameters, as indicated by up to tenfold differences in both tensile and compressive properties. Test mode (stress relaxation, creep, cyclic) and configuration (unconfined, confined, in-situ), specimen shape and dimensions, preconditioning regimes, loading rates, post-processing of experimental data, and specimen age and degeneration were identified as the most critical parameters influencing the outcome measures. In conclusion, this work highlights an unmet need for standardization and reporting guidelines to facilitate comparability and may prove beneficial for evaluating the mechanical properties of novel meniscus constructs. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: The biomechanical properties of the human meniscus have been studied extensively over the past decades. However, it remains unclear to what extent both test protocol and specimen-related differences are responsible for the enormous variability in material properties. Therefore, this systematic review analyzes the biomechanical properties of the human meniscus in the context of the underlying testing protocol. The most sensitive parameters affecting the determination of mechanical properties were identified and critically discussed. Currently, it is of utmost importance for scientists evaluating potential meniscal scaffolds and biomaterials to have a control group rather than a direct comparison to the literature. Standardization of both test procedures and reporting requirements is needed to improve and accelerate the development of meniscal replacement constructs.

Posteromedial capsular anatomy of the tibia for consideration of the medial meniscal support structure using a multidimensional analysis

Medial meniscal extrusion (MME) is a structural abnormality that leads to early knee osteoarthritis; however, its formation remains debated. For anatomical consideration of the mechanism underlying MME formation, we examined the capsular attachment on the posteromedial tibia and its layered association with the semimembranosus. Fourteen knees of eight body donors were analyzed in this study; six knees were grouped for macroscopic analysis, whereas four knees each were grouped for histological and phosphotungstic acid-enhanced micro-computed tomography analyses. The capsular attachment varied in width according to location and was not distant from the articular cartilage and posterior root. A portion of the posteromedial joint capsule formed the semimembranosus tendinous sheath. The dense fibrous membrane superficial to the semimembranosus, which was continuous from its tendinous sheath, existed as one of the layers of the joint capsule. The aforementioned findings were confirmed in all specimens. Based on the capsular attachment and its layered association with the semimembranosus, the conventional posteromedial knee ligaments may be only a part of the joint capsule divided into two layers by the semimembranosus. If the coordinated action of the joint capsule and semimembranosus partially contributes to the medial meniscus stability, such a structural problem may affect MME formation.

Comparison of temporomandibular joint disc, meniscus, and intervertebral disc in fundamental characteristics and tissue engineering

The temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc, meniscus and intervertebral disc (IVD) are three fibrocartilage discs, which play critical roles in our daily life. Their degeneration contributes to diseases such as TMJ disorders, osteoarthritis and degenerative disc disease, affecting patients' quality of life and causing substantial morbidity and mortality. Interestingly, similar in some aspects of fundamental characteristics, they exhibit differences in other aspects such as biomechanical properties. Highlighting these similarities and differences can not only benefit a comprehensive understanding of them and their pathology but also assist in future research of tissue engineering. Likewise, comparing their tissue engineering in cell sources, scaffold and stimuli can guide imitation and improvement of their engineered discs. However, the anatomical structure, function, and biomechanical characteristics of the IVD, TMJ, and Meniscus have not been compared in any meaningful depth needed to advance current tissue engineering research on these joints, resulting in incomplete understanding of them and their pathology and ultimately limiting future research of tissue engineering. This review, for the first time, comprehensively compares three fibrocartilage discs in those aspects to cast light on their similarities and differences.

Circumferential Rim Augmentation Suture Around the Perimeniscal Capsule Decreases Meniscal Extrusion and Progression of Osteoarthritis in Rabbit Meniscus Root Tear Model

BACKGROUND

We recently analyzed the joint capsule adjacent to the medial meniscus and found that the perimeniscal joint capsule has collagen fiber orientation similar to that of circumferential meniscal fibers, potentially playing a role in preventing extrusion.

PURPOSE

To analyze the meniscal extrusion prevention potential of the circumferential rim augmentation suture around the perimeniscal capsule in a rabbit root tear model and analyze the biomechanical function in a porcine cadaveric knee.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Rabbit medial meniscus root tear models were divided into 3 experimental groups: root tear, root tear and suture repair, and root tear and circumferential rim augmentation suture. As for the circumferential rim augmentation suture procedure, a suture was placed to circumscribe the outer rim of the medial meniscus and passed through bone tunnels located at the tibial insertion of each root. After 4 and 8 weeks, meniscal extrusion was analyzed by micro-computed tomography, gross morphology, and histologic analysis of the medial femoral cartilage. For biomechanical analysis, porcine knees were divided into groups similar to rabbit experiments. Tibiofemoral contact parameters were assessed using a pressure mapping sensor system after applying a load of 200 N on the knee joint.

RESULTS

The root tear and circumferential rim augmentation suture group showed less meniscal extrusion, less gap within the tear site, and less cartilage degeneration compared with other groups after 4 and 8 weeks of surgery in the rabbit root tear model. Biomechanical analysis showed the root tear and circumferential rim augmentation suture group had larger contact area and lower peak contact pressure compared with root tear and root tear and suture repair groups.

CONCLUSION

The circumferential rim augmentation suture reduced the degree of meniscal extrusion while restoring meniscal function, potentially preventing progression of arthritis in a rabbit root tear model and porcine knee biomechanical analysis.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The circumferential rim augmentation suture may be a novel augmentation option during root tear treatment.