Gynecologic large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: A review

Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Cervix: Case Report and Literature Review

Background and clinical significance: Large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the cervix is considered a rare type of cancer: it represents <1% of invasive cervical cancers. The optimal treatment protocol is not fully established because of its rarity and diagnostic challenges. Case Presentation: A 72-year-old Asian female presented to our outpatient clinic with postmenopausal vaginal spotting for 1 month. Vaginal sonography revealed a cervical tumor of 2.7 cm in diameter with hypervascularity. Tumor markers such as CA 125, CA 19-9, carcinoembryonic antigen, and squamous cell carcinoma antigen all showed no abnormality. Due to high suspicion of cervical cancer, a pap smear and endocervical curettage were performed and confirmed the diagnosis of LCNEC. A positron emission tomography-computed tomography scan demonstrated a glucose hypermetabolic lesion in the mid-pelvic region, localized to the uterus, consistent with LCNEC. Surgery with radical hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection was performed. The patient was finally diagnosed with pT1b2N1mi, FIGO IIIC1. Immunohistochemical stain shows that the neoplastic cells were CK (+), p63 (-), p16 (-), CEA (-), vimentin (-), ER (-), WT-1 (-), p53 (-), and CD56 (+), with a high Ki67 index (75%). Concurrent chemotherapy with cisplatin and radiotherapy was performed. Four cycles of etoposide and cisplatin were planned. A 3-month follow-up of this patient revealed stable tumor marker levels. Conclusions: This case highlights the diagnostic challenges and aggressive nature of LCNEC of the cervix, emphasizing the need for a standardized treatment approach to improve patient outcomes.

Clinicopathologic feature and treatment progress of high-grade ovarian neuroendocrine tumors

High-grade Ovarian neuroendocrine tumors represent a rare subset of ovarian neoplasms characterized by aggressive behavior, poor prognosis, and early metastasis. Despite their clinical significance, the management of these tumors lacks consensus due to their low incidence. This comprehensive review encompasses literature spanning from 1991 to 2024, focusing on the clinical presentation, diagnostic criteria, differential diagnosis, prognostic indicators, treatment modalities, and recent advancements in the understanding of this condition. Notably, a substantial proportion of affected individuals present during the perimenopausal period with unilateral lesions displaying mixed histological components. Biomarkers such as CA125, CA199, and NSE hold promise for aiding in the diagnosis and screening of ovarian neuroendocrine tumors. Unfortunately, patients exhibit a dismal prognosis even diagnosed at an early stage. Primary treatment strategies predominantly involve surgical intervention coupled with etoposide-cisplatin combination chemotherapy. In cases of recurrence, second-line chemotherapeutic agents including paclitaxel, irinotecan, and doxorubicin are commonly employed alongside localized radiotherapy. While specific genetic mutations remain elusive, emerging evidence suggests potential therapeutic effect involving mTOR inhibitors, PD-1 monoclonal antibodies, and antiangiogenic agents based on isolated case reports. The exploration of representative set of mutations will help for precise targeted therapies and remains a focal point of our ongoing research efforts.

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: a case report

Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma (LCNEC) of the cervix is an extremely rare but highly aggressive type of cervical cancer and it requires multimodal therapy to improve their quality of life. At present, there are no established, standardized treatment protocols for managing large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix. In this report, we present a case of a patient with cervical LCNEC, Who was a 39-year-old woman who presented with irregular vaginal bleeding accompanied by lower abdominal distension for over a month. Examination revealed a cauliflower-like cervical mass approximately 4cm in diameter, with the normal cervical architecture distorted and partially fused to the vaginal wall. Following further investigations, the stage assigned was IVB, and who was started on neoadjuvant chemotherapy with the TC (paclitaxel + carboplatin) regimen but during neoadjuvant chemotherapy, The patient developed a vaginal urinary leakage. Then, The patient underwent a comprehensive treatment regimen that included pelvic exenteration, urinary system reconstruction, pelvic floor reconstruction, and chemotherapy. Given the patient's positive immunohistochemistry for EGFR, the treatment was combined with the anti-angiogenic drug, bevacizumab. The patient achieved complete remission following the comprehensive treatment. Through this case to explore individualized treatment for cervical LCNEC.

Role of radiotherapy in the management of rare gynaecological cancers

There are a large number of gynaecological cancers with rare histologies, for which the available data are limited and usually retrospective. Because of their rarity and poor prognosis, the management of these cancers must be centralized in expert centres, for both histological diagnosis and treatment. With the exception of sarcomas, most endometrial or cervical cancers with rare histologies respond to the same radiation treatment modalities than cancers with more common histologies, although there are some specificities regarding treatments such as neuroendocrine carcinomas (chemotherapy with platinum and etoposide, major role of surgery). For localized or locally advanced ovarian cancer, external beam radiotherapy has a role in the management of hypercalcaemic small cell carcinoma of the ovary. This article summarizes the current role of external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy in the management of cancers of the uterine cervix, uterine corpus and ovaries, with rare or very rare histologies, and with localized or locally advanced stages.

Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the endometrium concomitant with Lynch syndrome: A case report

BACKGROUND

Large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) is an uncommon type of tumor that can occur in the endometrium. This aggressive cancer requires definitive management. Here, we describe the clinical characteristics and treatment of a postmenopausal woman with large cell NEC of the endometrium.

CASE SUMMARY

A 55-year-old Asian female presented with a 1-year history of postmenopausal vaginal bleeding. Transvaginal ultrasound revealed a thickened endometrium (30.2 mm) and a hypervascular tumor. Computed tomography revealed that the tumor had invaded more than half of the myometrium and spread to the pelvic lymph nodes. The tumor marker, carcinoembryonic antigen, was elevated (3.65 ng/mL). Endocervical biopsy revealed high-grade endometrial carcinoma. She underwent radical hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, and bilateral pelvic and para-aortic lymph node dissection. Pathological examination revealed mixed neuroendocrine and endometrioid adenocarcinoma, pT2N0M0, grade 3, and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage 2. Immunohistochemistry showed moderate estrogen and progesterone receptor expressions (20% and 1%, respectively), focal CD56 expression (NEC marker), positive staining for vimentin, p53 (wild type), and ki67 (90%), and loss of expression of PMS2 (Lynch syndrome marker). The patient received five cycles of cisplatin and etoposide after surgery. No recurrence was noted after 5 mo.

CONCLUSION

We report the characteristics and successful management of a rare case of large-cell endometrial NEC concomitant with Lynch syndrome.

Large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the gynecologic tract: Prevalence, survival outcomes, and associated factors

BACKGROUND

We aimed to assess the clinical behavior of gynecologic large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) via a retrospective analysis of data from 469 patients.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with gynecologic LCNEC from 1988 to 2015 were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Univariate and multivariate Cox hazard regression analyses were performed to assess independent predictors of overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). OS and CSS were also evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the effects of different treatment regimens on prognosis were compared according to disease stage.

RESULTS

Cervical, ovarian, and endometrial LCNEC were observed in 169, 219, and 79 patients, respectively. The 5-year OS rates for patients with cervical, ovarian, and endometrial LCNEC were 35.98%, 17.84%, and 23.21%, respectively, and the median duration of overall survival was 26, 11, and 11 months in each group. The 5-year CSS rates for the three groups were 45.23%, 19.23%, and 31.39%, respectively, and the median duration of CSS was 41, 12, and 11 months in each group. Multivariate analysis revealed that American Joint Committee on Cancer stage, lymph node metastasis, and chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors for OS and CSS in patients with cervical LCNEC. Lymph node metastasis, surgery, and chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors for OS and CSS in the ovarian group and for OS in the endometrial group. Lymph node metastasis and surgery were also independent prognostic factors for CSS in the endometrial group.

CONCLUSION

Surgery alone may help to improve overall survival and CSS in patients with early-stage cervical LCNEC. In contrast, surgery+chemotherapy and surgery+radiotherapy may help to improve survival in those with early-stage ovarian and endometrial LCNEC, respectively. Regardless of subtype, comprehensive treatment involving surgery, CTX, and RT should be considered to improve prognosis in patients with advanced-stage gynecologic LCNEC.

Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Skin/Conjunctiva: A Series of 6 Cases including 1 Combined Case With Squamous Cell Carcinoma

ABSTRACT

This study sought to reveal the clinicopathologic characteristics of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the skin/conjunctiva. The retrieved patients included 3 men and 3 women with a median age of 85 (63-95) years. All lesions occurred on the face, including the ears, with a median tumor size of 11.5 (7-65) mm. Lymph node metastasis was observed in 5 (83%) of 6 cases, and distant metastasis was noted in 2 (33%). One patient (17%) who had a 13-mm-sized tumor died of the tumor 13 months after excision. All tumors were mainly located in the dermis, and one of them also exhibited intraepithelial spreading. The cytology resembled that of an LCNEC in other organs. No adnexal differentiation was observed. Five cases were of the pure type, but one had a component of squamous cell carcinoma. Immunoreactivities for CAM5.2, CK7, CK19, BerEP4, epithelial membrane antigen, neuron-specific enolase, synaptophysin, c-KIT, GATA3, and bcl-2 were frequently present, but CK20, neurofilament, Merkel cell polyomavirus large T antigen, mammaglobin, estrogen receptor, HER2, and TTF1 were completely negative in all cases. Mutant-pattern immunostaining of p53, PTEN, and Rb was frequently observed. The Ki67 rate exceeded 70% in all cases. LCNEC of the skin/conjunctiva is a morphologically-defined group of primary cutaneous/conjunctival neuroendocrine neoplasm, although it may be heterogeneous similar to other-site LCNEC or Merkel cell carcinoma. This study highlighted the predominant location for the face, high metastatic and lethal potential, possible combination with other tumor components, and frequent mutant-type immunoexpressions of p53, PTEN, and Rb in this tumor group.

Differences in Characteristics and Outcomes Between Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Ovary and High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study

Background

Owing to its extremely low incidence and the paucity of relevant reports, there is currently no recognized first-line treatment strategy for ovarian large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, and there are no statistics related to prognosis derived from large samples. This study aimed to investigate the characteristics, outcomes, and independent predictors of survival for ovarian large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and compare them with those of high-grade serous ovarian cancer.

Methods

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was used to identify women diagnosed with ovarian large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma or high-grade serous ovarian cancer from 1988 to 2015. Clinical, demographic, and treatment characteristics were compared between the groups. Propensity-score matching, Cox risk regression analysis, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to analyze the data.

Results

In total, 23,917 women, including 23,698 (99.1%) diagnosed with high-grade serous ovarian cancer and 219 (0.9%) diagnosed with ovarian large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, were identified. Age >77 years, diagnosis before 2003-2010, and advanced-stage disease were more common in patients with ovarian large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma than in those with high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Women with ovarian large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma were less likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy (54.8% vs. 81.9%) but more likely to receive radiotherapy (3.2% vs. 1.5%; both P<0.001) than women with high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Stage, chemotherapy, and tumor size were independent predictors of overall survival, and the risk of death was greater in the advanced stage than in the early stage (P=0.047). Chemotherapy and tumor size were also independent predictors of cancer-specific survival. Overall and cancer-specific survival rates were significantly low for ovarian large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma than for more malignant high-grade serous ovarian cancer.

Conclusions

Compared to patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer, those with ovarian large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma presented more often with advanced-stage disease and had decreased overall and cancer-specific survival rates.

Primary neuroendocrine tumors of the ovary: Management and outcomes

Background

There is currently no recognized first‐line treatment strategy for ovarian neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Furthermore, because of the low incidence of ovarian NETs, no studies have reported prognostic statistics derived from large samples. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the clinical behavior of ovarian NETs.

Methods

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was used to identify women diagnosed with ovarian NETs from 2004 to 2015. Overall survival (OS), cancer‐specific survival (CSS), and independent prognostic factors for ovarian NETs were evaluated. The effects of different treatments on prognosis were also compared, as were OS and CSS rates for histological subtypes.

Results

The 5‐year OS rates were 83.3%, 30.0%, 20.3%, and 9.8% for patients in stages I (n = 159), II (n = 23), III (n = 101), and IV (n = 148), respectively. The 5‐year CSS rates were 85.6%, 41.7%, 21.2%, and 9.8% for patients in stages I–IV, respectively. Age, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, lymph node metastasis, treatment, and histological type were related to poor OS and CSS. In the early stage, the 5‐year OS and CSS rates were 97.03% and 96.90%, respectively. For patients in the advanced stage receiving comprehensive treatment (surgery + chemotherapy + radiotherapy), the 5‐year OS and CSS rates were 72.9% and 70.00%, respectively. When comparing low‐ and high‐grade neuroendocrine carcinoma, 5‐year OS rates were 93.96% and 7.01%, 5‐year CSS rates were 97.44% and 7.31%, 10‐year OS rates were 93.56% and 2.34%, and 10‐year CSS rates were 97.44% and 4.88%, respectively.

Conclusion

Age, AJCC stage, treatment, and histological type are independent prognostic factors of ovarian NETs. OS and CSS are relatively good for early‐stage cases treated with surgery alone, whereas more comprehensive treatment is required to improve OS and CSS in the advanced stage.

Management of Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare, aggressive cancer with a dismal prognosis. The majority of cases occur in the lung and the gastrointestinal tract; however, it can occur throughout the body. Recently advances in the understanding of the molecular underpinnings of this disease have paved the way for additional novel promising therapies. This review will discuss the current best evidence for management of LCNEC and new directions in the classification and treatment of this rare disease.

METHODS

We performed a PubMed search for "Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma" and "High grade neuroendocrine carcinoma." All titles were screened for relevance to the management of LCNEC. Papers were included based on relevance to the management of LCNEC.

RESULTS

Papers were included reviewing both pulmonary and extra pulmonary LCNEC. We summarized the data driven best practices for the management of both early and advanced stage LCNEC. We describe emerging therapies with promising potential.

DISCUSSION

LCNEC are rare and aggressive neoplasms. In advanced disease, the historical regimen of platinum based therapy in combination with etoposide or irinotecan remains among the commonly used first line therapies, however for extra thoracic LCNEC regimens like FOLFOX, FOLFOIRI and CAPTEM can also be used. Further effective and safe treatment options are desperately needed. Recently, new advances including a new understanding of the genetic subcategories of LCNEC and immunotherapy agents may guide further treatments.

Human Papilloma Virus 18-Positive Submucosal Small Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Vagina: An Immunohistochemical and Genomic Study

Primary vaginal neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) is extremely rare among female genital tract tumors. Here, we report 2 cases of vaginal small cell NEC (SCNEC) using immunohistochemistry and next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis. The 2 patients were in their mid-to-late 70s, presented with abnormal vaginal bleeding and had a vaginal submucosal mass. The biopsied or resected tumors showed a typical neuroendocrine morphology consisting of solid nests of atypical tumor cells, with no specific organoid patterns, and proliferating in the vaginal submucosa. Immunohistochemical analysis showed strong and diffuse expression of chromogranin A, synaptophysin, and p16, but no thyroid transcription factor 1 expression. Additionally, both cases were positive for human papillomavirus (HPV) 18. An NGS-based cancer panel analysis revealed that the tumors carried NF1 and AR mutations, but no major driver mutations were detected. The results of this study suggested that HPV18 infection is linked to vaginal SCNEC.