The effect of doxycycline on neuron-specific enolase in patients with traumatic brain injury: a randomized controlled trial

Effectiveness of biomedical interventions on the chronic stage of traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Traumatic brain injury (TBI), in any form and severity, can pose risks for developing chronic symptoms that can profoundly hinder patients' work/academic, social, and personal lives. In the past 3 decades, a multitude of pharmacological, stimulation, and exercise-based interventions have been proposed to ameliorate symptoms, memory impairment, mental fatigue, and/or sleep disturbances. However, most research is preliminary, thus limited influence on clinical practice. This review aims to systematically appraise the evidence derived from randomized controlled trials (RCT) regarding the effectiveness of pharmacological, stimulation, and exercise-based interventions in treating chronic symptoms due to TBI. Our search results indicate that despite the largest volume of literature, pharmacological interventions, especially using neurostimulant medications to treat physical, cognitive, and mental fatigue, as well as daytime sleepiness, have yielded inconsistent results, such that some studies found improvements in fatigue (e.g., Modafinil, Armodafinil) while others failed to yield the improvements after the intervention. Conversely, brain stimulation techniques (e.g., transcranial magnetic stimulation, blue light therapy) and exercise interventions were effective in ameliorating mental health symptoms and cognition. However, given that most RCTs are equipped with small sample sizes, more high-quality, larger-scale RCTs is needed.

Current state of neuroprotective therapy using antibiotics in human traumatic brain injury and animal models

TBI is a leading cause of death and disability in young people and older adults worldwide. There is no gold standard treatment for TBI besides surgical interventions and symptomatic relief. Post-injury infections, such as lower respiratory tract and surgical site infections or meningitis are frequent complications following TBI. Whether the use of preventive and/or symptomatic antibiotic therapy improves patient mortality and outcome is an ongoing matter of debate. In contrast, results from animal models of TBI suggest translational perspectives and support the hypothesis that antibiotics, independent of their anti-microbial activity, alleviate secondary injury and improve neurological outcomes. These beneficial effects were largely attributed to the inhibition of neuroinflammation and neuronal cell death. In this review, we briefly outline current treatment options, including antibiotic therapy, for patients with TBI. We then summarize the therapeutic effects of the most commonly tested antibiotics in TBI animal models, highlight studies identifying molecular targets of antibiotics, and discuss similarities and differences in their mechanistic modes of action.

Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 inhibitors as therapeutic drugs for traumatic brain injury

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality among young adults and the elderly. In the United States, TBI is responsible for around 30 percent of all injuries brought on by injuries in general. Vasogenic cerebral edema due to blood-brain barrier (BBB) dysfunction and the associated elevation of intracranial pressure (ICP) are some of the major causes of secondary injuries following traumatic brain injury. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) is a therapeutic target for being an enzyme that degrades the proteins that make up a part of the microvascular basal lamina as well as inter-endothelial tight junctions of the blood-brain barrier. MMP-9-mediated BBB dysfunctions and the compromise of the BBB is a major pathway that leads the development of vasogenic cerebral edema, elevation of ICP, poor cerebral perfusion and brain herniation following traumatic brain injury. That makes MMP-9 an effective therapeutic target and endogenous or exogenous MMP-9 inhibitors as therapeutic drugs for preventing secondary brain damage after traumatic brain injury. Although our understanding of the mechanisms that underlie the primary and secondary stages of damage following a TBI has significantly improved in recent years, such information has not yet resulted in the successful development of novel pharmacological treatment options for traumatic brain injury. Recent pre-clinical and/or clinical studies have demonstrated that there are several compounds with specific or non-specific MMP-9 inhibitory properties either directly binding and inhibiting MMP-9 or by indirectly inhibiting MMP-9, with potential as therapeutic agents for traumatic brain injury. This article reviews the efficacy of several such medications and potential agents that include endogenous and exogeneous compounds that are at various levels of research and development. MMP-9-based therapeutic drug development has enormous potential in the pharmacological treatment of cerebral edema and/or neuronal injury resulting from traumatic brain injury.

Effects of remote ischemic preconditioning in severe traumatic brain injury: A single-center randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant contributor to global mortality and impairment. Experimental data has shown the advantages of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) in treating brain injury, however, there is a lack of evidence-based medicine regarding its clinical effectiveness and safety.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, we investigated whether RIPC could enhance outcomes in patients with severe TBI. Between January 2019 and December 2022, a comprehensive assessment was conducted on 392 individuals with severe TBI. Out of these, 304 patients were initially included and randomly assigned to receive either RIPC treatment (n = 153) or a control treatment (n = 151). The main measures of results included Glasgow Outcome Scale scores at 6 months, the occurrence of cerebral infarction during hospitalization, mortality rate within 30 days, levels of neuron-specific enolase and S-100β, any adverse effects, expenses incurred during hospitalization, and duration of hospital stay.

RESULTS

The 2 groups did not show any statistically significant differences in baseline clinical data. The Glasgow Outcome Scale scores at 6 months in the RIPC group showed significant improvement when compared with the control group. Additionally, the application of RIPC therapy can reduce the concentrations of neuron-specific enolase and S-100β. There was no notable distinction observed between the 2 groups regarding the adverse reactions of RIPC-induced objective indications of tissue or neurovascular harm. In the RIPC group, there was a significant reduction in both the duration of hospital stays and the expenses associated with hospitalization.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that RIPC has the potential to enhance clinical outcomes, mitigate nerve damage, and reduce both hospital expenses and length of stay in patients with severe TBI. The use of RIPC is a reliable and efficient method for managing severe TBI.

Effects of early adjunctive pharmacotherapy on serum levels of brain injury biomarkers in patients with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of randomized controlled studies

Objectives: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the top causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The review aimed to discuss and summarize the current evidence on the effectiveness of adjuvant neuroprotective treatments in terms of their effect on brain injury biomarkers in TBI patients. Methods: To identify relevant studies, four scholarly databases, including PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, and Google Scholar, were systematically searched using predefined search terms. English-language randomized controlled clinical trials reporting changes in brain injury biomarkers, namely, neuron-specific enolase (NSE), glial fibrillary acid protein (GFAP), ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal esterase L1 (UCHL₁) and/or S100 beta (S100 ß), were included. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Results: A total of eleven studies with eight different therapeutic options were investigated; of them, tetracyclines, metformin, and memantine were discovered to be promising choices that could improve neurological outcomes in TBI patients. The most utilized serum biomarkers were NSE and S100 ß followed by GFAP, while none of the included studies quantified UCHL₁. The heterogeneity in injury severity categories and measurement timing may affect the overall evaluation of the clinical efficacy of potential therapies. Therefore, unified measurement protocols are highly warranted to inform clinical decisions. Conclusion: Few therapeutic options showed promising results as an adjuvant to standard care in patients with TBI. Several considerations for future work must be directed towards standardizing monitoring biomarkers. Investigating the pharmacotherapy effectiveness using a multimodal biomarker panel is needed. Finally, employing stratified randomization in future clinical trials concerning potential confounders, including age, trauma severity levels, and type, is crucial to inform clinical decisions. Clinical Trial Registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/dis], identifier [CRD42022316327].

The ratio of serum neuron-specific enolase level to admission glasgow coma scale score is associated with diffuse axonal injury in patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury

Background

Moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is frequently accompanied by diffuse axonal injury (DAI). Considering the low sensitivity of computed tomography (CT) examination for microbleeds and axonal damage, identification of DAI is difficult using conventional diagnostic methods in the acute phase. Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) has been demonstrated to be increased in serum following various types of TBI and is already clinically/commercially available. We conjecture that serum NSE level to admission GCS score ratio (NGR) may be a useful indicator for the early diagnosis of DAI.

Methods

This study included 115 patients with moderate-to-severe TBI who underwent NSE measurements within 6 h after injury and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within 30 days. The positive and negative DAI groups were divided according to MRI findings.

Results

Among the 115 patients, 49 (42.6%) were classified into the DAI group and 66 (57.4%) patients into the non-DAI group by clinical MRI. The NGR of patients without DAI was found to be significantly lower than those of patients with DAI (p < 0.0001). NGR presented the largest Pearson r value (r = 0.755, 95% CI 0.664–0.824, p < 0.0001) and high diagnostic accuracy for DAI [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.9493; sensitivity, 90.91%; and specificity, 85.71%]. Patients with TBI presenting with higher NGR were more likely to suffer an unfavorable neurological outcome [6-month extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE) 1–4].

Conclusions

The NGR on admission could serve as an independent predictor of DAI with moderate-to-severe TBI.

Biomarkers of Neuroinflammation in Traumatic Brain Injury

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is characterized by neuroinflammation and structural damage leading to symptoms and altered brain function. Biomarkers are useful in understanding neuroinflammation and correlations with TBI sequalae. The purpose of this paper is to identify and discuss biomarkers of neuroinflammation used to study TBI and its sequalae. A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and Web of Science. A total of 350 articles met criteria; 70 used biomarkers. PRISMA criteria were used for Quality Assessment. Articles included reviews (n = 17), case-control (n = 25), cross-sectional (n = 25) studies, and randomized controlled trials (n = 3). Twenty-seven biomarkers were identified, including inflammasomes, cytokines, neuropeptides, complement complexes, miRNA and exosomes, and glial cell-specific proteins. Biomarkers aid in predicting morbidity and mortality and advance our understanding of neuroinflammation in TBI. This systematic review advances our understanding of the neuroinflammatory response to better enable nurses and clinicians to provide informed care of TBI patients.