Systematic investment in the delivery of guideline-coherent therapy reduces mortality and overall costs in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Results from the Stent for Life economic model for Romania, Portugal, Basque Country and Kemerovo region

Predicted clinical and economic burden associated with reduction in access to acute coronary interventional care during the COVID-19 lockdown in two European countries

AIMS

As a consequence of untimely or missed revascularization of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients during the COVID-19 pandemic, many patients died at home or survived with serious sequelae, resulting in potential long-term worse prognosis and related health-economic implications.This analysis sought to predict long-term health outcomes [survival and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs)] and cost of reduced treatment of STEMIs occurring during the first COVID-19 lockdown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using a Markov decision-analytic model, we incorporated probability of hospitalization, timeliness of PCI, and projected long-term survival and cost (including societal costs) of mortality and morbidity, for STEMI occurring during the first UK and Spanish lockdowns, comparing them with expected pre-lockdown outcomes for an equivalent patient group.STEMI patients during the first UK lockdown were predicted to lose an average of 1.55 life-years and 1.17 QALYs compared with patients presenting with a STEMI pre-pandemic. Based on an annual STEMI incidence of 49 332 cases, the total additional lifetime costs calculated at the population level were £36.6 million (€41.3 million), mainly driven by costs of work absenteeism. Similarly in Spain, STEMI patients during the lockdown were expected to survive 2.03 years less than pre-pandemic patients, with a corresponding reduction in projected QALYs (-1.63). At the population level, reduced PCI access would lead to additional costs of €88.6 million.

CONCLUSION

The effect of a 1-month lockdown on STEMI treatment led to a reduction in survival and QALYs compared to the pre-pandemic era. Moreover, in working-age patients, untimely revascularization led to adverse prognosis, affecting societal productivity and therefore considerably increasing societal costs.

Short- and long-term survival after ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with pharmacoinvasive versus primary percutaneous coronary intervention strategy: a prospective cohort study

Objective

Compare survival in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with a pharmacoinvasive (PI) or primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) strategy based on estimated time to PCI.

Design

Prospective observational cohort study. Consecutive STEMI patients were registered on admission to our PCI centre and classified in a PI or pPCI group, based on the reperfusion strategy chosen in the prehospital or local hospital location. Time and cause of death was provided by the Norwegian Cause of Death registry. Mortality at 30 days, Kaplan-Meier survival and incidence of cardiovascular (CV) death was estimated. Adjusted effect of PI versus pPCI strategy on survival was estimated using logistic and Cox regression and propensity score weighting.

Setting

Single-centre registry in Norway during 2005–2011, within a regional STEMI network allocating patients to a PI strategy if estimated time to PCI >120 min.

Primary outcomes

30-day mortality and survival during follow-up.

Secondary outcome

Incidence of CV death during follow-up.

Results

4061 STEMI patients <80 years were included, 527 (13%) treated with a PI strategy and 3534 (87%) with a pPCI strategy. Median symptom-to-needle time was 110 min (25–75th percentile 75–163) in the PI group vs symptom-to-balloon 230 min (149–435) in the pPCI group. 30-day mortality was 3.2% and 5.0% in the PI and pPCI groups (OR_adjusted0.58 (95% CI 0.30 to 1.13)) and 8-year survival was 85.9% (95% CI 80.9% to 89.6%) and 79.3% (95% CI 76.9% to 81.6%), respectively (HR_adjusted 0.72 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.99)). Unadjusted incidence of 8-year CV death was 7.0% (95% CI 4.4% to 10.4%) in the PI group vs 12.4% (95% CI 9.9% to 15.2%) in the pPCI group. Adjusted long-term CV death was also lower in the PI group.

Conclusion

STEMI patients treated with a PI strategy experienced better survival compared with a pPCI strategy, also when adjusting for baseline characteristics. This supports using a PI strategy for eligible STEMI patients when pPCI cannot be performed within 120 min.

How to set up regional STEMI networks: a "Stent - Save a life!" initiative

Clinical guidelines recommend the development of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) networks at community, regional and/or national level to ideally offer primary coronary angioplasty, or at least the best available STEMI care to all patients. However, there is a discrepancy between this clinical recommendation and daily practice, with no coordinated care for STEMI patients in many regions of the world. While this can be a consequence of lack of resources, in reality it is more frequently a lack of organisational power. In this paper, the Stent - Save a Life! Initiative (www.stentsavealife.com) proposes a practical methodology to set up a STEMI network effectively in any region of the world with existing resources, and to develop the STEMI network continuously once it has been established.

Ticagrelor Utilization in Patients With Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes in Romania

BACKGROUND

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) represents a major tool of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) management. The real-world usage of potent P2Y12 inhibitors within DAPT in middle-income countries is poorly described.

STUDY QUESTION

To assess the factors that influence P2Y12 inhibitor choice at discharge in invasively managed NSTE-ACS patients, without an indication for oral anticoagulation, treated across Romania.

STUDY DESIGN

The Romanian National NSTE-ACS Registry allows the consecutive enrollment of NSTE-ACS patients admitted in 11 (of 24) interventional centers reimbursed from public funds.

MEASURES AND OUTCOMES

NSTE-ACS patients that received DAPT at discharge were identified. Deceased patients, those with an indication for oral anticoagulation or not receiving DAPT at discharge, were excluded. P2Y12 inhibitor choice was analyzed based on demographic, clinical, and invasive management characteristics.

RESULTS

One thousand fifty (63 ± 10 years, 73% male) of 1418 patients enrolled between 2016 and 2019 were analyzed. The P2Y12 inhibitor pretreatment rate was 90%. Obstructive coronary artery disease was found in 95.3% of patients. 84.6% underwent percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). Single vessel PCI was reported in 84% of PCI patients. The clopidogrel usage rate was 49.6%, ticagrelor 50.0%, and prasugrel 0.4%. Overall, higher ticagrelor usage was associated with: non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (P 0.035), age below 65 (P < 0.001), prior treatment with ticagrelor (P < 0.001), PCI during admission (P < 0.001), and its full 12-month reimbursement (since November 2017). Reimbursement increased the use of ticagrelor from 23.7% in 2016-2017 to 56.9% in 2018-2019 (P < 0.001). In PCI patients, ticagrelor use was associated with PCI with stenting (P 0.016) and multivessel PCI (0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

DAPT, P2Y12 inhibitor pretreatment, and single vessel PCI are the standards of care in invasively managed NSTE-ACS patients in Romania. Besides the clinical and invasive characteristics that favor its use, the full reimbursement of ticagrelor introduced in November 2017 doubled its yearly usage.