Hepatitis C outreach project and cross-sectional epidemiology in high-risk populations in Trondheim, Norway

Prevalence of Hepatitis C Among Migrants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The World Health Organisation has targeted the Hepatitis C virus (HCV) to be eliminated as a public health threat by 2030. Equitable access to HCV testing and treatment services is important in achieving this goal. Migrants often face barriers to accessing health services, and understanding HCV prevalence among this population can support planning for elimination. This systematic review aimed to estimate HCV prevalence among migrants residing in high-income countries with low/intermediate HCV prevalence. Scopus, PubMed, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library were searched for peer-reviewed articles published in English between 2015 and 2024. The studies' quality was assessed using The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Tools. A proportional meta-analysis was used to estimate HCV prevalence. Thirty-seven studies were included in this review. Seventeen studies included both people < 18 and ≥ 18 years old, 16 studies only included people ≥ 18 years old, and three studies included people aged 18 and younger. The pooled prevalence of HCV antibody (anti-HCV) and RNA (HCV-RNA) were 1.5% (95% CI, 1.1%-2.0%) and 0.6% (95% CI, 0.4%-0.9%), respectively. The prevalence of anti-HCV was higher among males (1.9%) than females (0.6%). Among refugees and asylum seekers, the prevalence of anti-HCV and HCV-RNA were 1.4% and 0.7%, respectively. The prevalence of HCV among migrants is comparable with that among the general population of the destination countries. Given the barriers migrants, especially refugees and asylum seekers, face in accessing health services, their access to HCV information, testing and treatment should be facilitated.

Prevention, testing, and treatment interventions for hepatitis B and C in refugee populations: results of a scoping review

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Refugees are at higher risk for hepatitis B (HBV) and hepatitis C (HCV), but often face unique healthcare barriers to vaccination, testing, and treatment. This scoping review aimed to identify and characterize HBV and HCV prevention and care services serving refugee populations globally.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted on Embase, Cochrane, and PubMed databases. Research studies published in English between January 2010 to July 2022 describing an HBV or HCV prevention, testing, or treatment intervention for refugees were included.

RESULTS

There were a total of 69 articles reporting viral hepatitis prevalence, implementation of services, or economic modelling. Of the 38 implementation studies, 14 were stand-alone HBV and/or HCV interventions, while 24 studies included HBV and/or HCV in an intervention targeting multiple infectious diseases and/or parasitic infections. Interventions commonly included a testing (n = 30) or referral (n = 24) component. Frequently reported features to promote program accessibility included bilingual services (n = 25), community partnerships (n = 21), and multidisciplinary staff members (n = 18), such as cultural and/or linguistic mediators, community health workers, community health leaders, lay health workers, local health staff, members of the refugee community, and social workers. The most commonly reported challenge was the transience of refugees (n = 5). Twenty studies noted funding sources, of which twelve reported governmental funding (not including national health insurance) and eight reported that refugees received national health insurance.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first scoping review to characterize the types of hepatitis prevention, screening, and treatment interventions serving refugee populations globally. Published experiences of HBV and HCV services for refugee populations remain limited. Additional efforts are needed to disseminate models of hepatitis interventions for refugees to ensure access to care for this key population. To achieve hepatitis elimination globally, best practices must be identified and shared to expand access to hepatitis services for refugee populations.

A systematic review of barriers and facilitators for hepatitis B and C screening among migrants in the EU/EEA region

Introduction

Hepatitis B and C are a threat to public health. Screening of high-risk groups, such as migrants from high-endemic areas, enables early identification and treatment initiation. This systematic review identified barriers and facilitators for hepatitis B and C screening among migrants in the European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA).

Methods

Following PRISMA guidelines, databases PubMed, Embase via Ovid, and Cochrane were searched for English articles published between 1 July 2015 and 24 February 2022. Articles were included, not restricted to a specific study design, if they elaborated on HBV or HCV screening in migrant populations from countries outside Western Europe, North America, and Oceania, and residing in EU/EEA countries. Excluded were studies with solely an epidemiological or microbiological focus, including only general populations or non-migrant subgroups, or conducted outside the EU/EEA, without qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods. Data appraisal, extraction, and quality assessment were conducted and assessed by two reviewers. Barriers and facilitators were categorized into seven levels based on multiple theoretical frameworks and included factors related to guidelines, the individual health professional, the migrant and community, interaction, the organization and economics, the political and legal level, and innovations.

Results

The search strategy yielded 2,115 unique articles of which 68 were included. Major identified barriers and facilitators to the success of screening related to the migrant (knowledge and awareness) and community level (culture, religion, support) and the organizational and economic level (capacity, resources, coordinated structures). Given possible language barriers, language support and migrant sensitivity are indispensable for facilitating interaction. Rapid point-of-care-testing is a promising strategy to lower screening barriers.

Discussion

The inclusion of multiple study designs provided extensive insight into barriers, strategies to lower these barriers, and facilitators to maximize the success of screening. A great variety of factors were revealed on multiple levels, therefore there is no one-size-fits-all approach for screening, and initiatives should be adopted for the targeted group(s), including tailoring to cultural and religious beliefs. We provide a checklist of facilitators and barriers to inform adapted interventions to allow for optimal screening impact.