1
|
Attarha M, Mahncke H, Merzenich M. The Real-World Usability, Feasibility, and Performance Distributions of Deploying a Digital Toolbox of Computerized Assessments to Remotely Evaluate Brain Health: Development and Usability Study. JMIR Form Res 2024; 8:e53623. [PMID: 38739916 PMCID: PMC11130778 DOI: 10.2196/53623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Revised: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND An ongoing global challenge is managing brain health and understanding how performance changes across the lifespan. OBJECTIVE We developed and deployed a set of self-administrable, computerized assessments designed to measure key indexes of brain health across the visual and auditory sensory modalities. In this pilot study, we evaluated the usability, feasibility, and performance distributions of the assessments in a home-based, real-world setting without supervision. METHODS Potential participants were untrained users who self-registered on an existing brain training app called BrainHQ. Participants were contacted via a recruitment email and registered remotely to complete a demographics questionnaire and 29 unique assessments on their personal devices. We examined participant engagement, descriptive and psychometric properties of the assessments, associations between performance and self-reported demographic variables, cognitive profiles, and factor loadings. RESULTS Of the 365,782 potential participants contacted via a recruitment email, 414 (0.11%) registered, of whom 367 (88.6%) completed at least one assessment and 104 (25.1%) completed all 29 assessments. Registered participants were, on average, aged 63.6 (SD 14.8; range 13-107) years, mostly female (265/414, 64%), educated (329/414, 79.5% with a degree), and White (349/414, 84.3% White and 48/414, 11.6% people of color). A total of 72% (21/29) of the assessments showed no ceiling or floor effects or had easily modifiable score bounds to eliminate these effects. When correlating performance with self-reported demographic variables, 72% (21/29) of the assessments were sensitive to age, 72% (21/29) of the assessments were insensitive to gender, 93% (27/29) of the assessments were insensitive to race and ethnicity, and 93% (27/29) of the assessments were insensitive to education-based differences. Assessments were brief, with a mean duration of 3 (SD 1.0) minutes per task. The pattern of performance across the assessments revealed distinctive cognitive profiles and loaded onto 4 independent factors. CONCLUSIONS The assessments were both usable and feasible and warrant a full normative study. A digital toolbox of scalable and self-administrable assessments that can evaluate brain health at a glance (and longitudinally) may lead to novel future applications across clinical trials, diagnostics, and performance optimization.
Collapse
|
2
|
Ezegbe C, Zarghami A, van der Mei I, Alty J, Honan C, Taylor B. Instruments measuring change in cognitive function in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review. Brain Behav 2023; 13:e3009. [PMID: 37062948 PMCID: PMC10275522 DOI: 10.1002/brb3.3009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 04/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic demyelinating/neurodegenerative disease associated with change in cognitive function (CF) over time. This systematic review aims to describe the instruments used to measure change in CF over time in people with MS (PwMS). METHODS PubMed, OVID, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched in English until May 2021. Articles were included if they had at least 100 participants and at least a 1-year interval between baseline and last follow-up measurement of CF. Results were quantitatively synthesized, presented in tables and risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS Fifty-seven articles met the inclusion criteria (41,623 PwMS and 1105 controls). An intervention (drug/rehabilitation) was assessed in 22 articles. In the studies that used a test battery, Visual and verbal learning and memory were the most frequently measured domains, but when studies that used test battery or a single test are combined, Information processing speed was the most measured. The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) was the most frequently used test as a single test and in a test battery combined. Most studied assessed "change in CF" as cognitive decline defined as 1 or more tests measured as ≥ 1.5 SD from the study control or normative mean in a test battery at baseline and follow-up. Meta-analysis of change in SDMT scores with seven articles indicated a nonstatistically significant -0.03 (95% CI -0.14, 0.09) decrease in mean SDMT score per year. CONCLUSION This study highlights the slow rate of measured change in cognition in PwMS and emphasizes the lack of a gold standard test and consistency in measuring cognitive change at the population level. More sensitive testing utilizing multiple domains and longer follow-up may define subgroups where CF change follows different trajectories thus allowing targeted interventions to directly support those where CF is at greatest risk of becoming a clinically meaningful issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chigozie Ezegbe
- Multiple Sclerosis Research Flagship, Menzies Institute for Medical ResearchUniversity of TasmaniaHobartTasmaniaAustralia
| | - Amin Zarghami
- Multiple Sclerosis Research Flagship, Menzies Institute for Medical ResearchUniversity of TasmaniaHobartTasmaniaAustralia
| | - Ingrid van der Mei
- Multiple Sclerosis Research Flagship, Menzies Institute for Medical ResearchUniversity of TasmaniaHobartTasmaniaAustralia
| | - Jane Alty
- Wicking Dementia Research and Education CentreUniversity of TasmaniaHobartTasmaniaAustralia
- Neurology DepartmentRoyal Hobart HospitalHobartTasmaniaAustralia
| | - Cynthia Honan
- School of Psychological SciencesUniversity of TasmaniaLauncestonTasmaniaAustralia
| | - Bruce Taylor
- Multiple Sclerosis Research Flagship, Menzies Institute for Medical ResearchUniversity of TasmaniaHobartTasmaniaAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gromisch ES, Turner AP, Haselkorn JK, Lo AC, Agresta T. Mobile health (mHealth) usage, barriers, and technological considerations in persons with multiple sclerosis: a literature review. JAMIA Open 2021; 4:ooaa067. [PMID: 34514349 PMCID: PMC8423420 DOI: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaa067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Revised: 10/01/2020] [Accepted: 11/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) can face a number of potential healthcare-related barriers, for which mobile health (mHealth) technology can be potentially beneficial. This review aimed to understand the frequency, current uses, and potential barriers with mHealth usage among persons with MS. METHODS A query string was used to identify articles on PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and IEEE Xplore that were published in English between January 2010 and December 2019. Abstracts were reviewed and selected based on a priori inclusion and exclusion criteria. Fifty-nine peer-reviewed research studies related to the study questions are summarized. RESULTS The majority of persons with MS were reported as using smartphones, although rates of mHealth utilization varied widely. mHealth usage was grouped into 3 broad categories: (1) disability and symptom measurement; (2) interventions and symptom management; and (3) tracking and promoting adherence. While there have been an increasing number of mHealth options, certain limitations associated with MS (eg, poor dexterity, memory problems) may affect usage, although including persons with MS in the design process can address some of these issues. DISCUSSION Given the increased attention to mHealth in this population and the current need for telehealth and at home devices, it is important that persons with MS and healthcare providers are involved in the development of new mHealth tools to ensure that the end product meets their needs. Considerations for addressing the potential mHealth use barriers in persons with MS are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth S Gromisch
- Mandell Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Mount Sinai Rehabilitation Hospital, Trinity Health Of New England, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Rehabilitative Medicine, Frank H. Netter MD School of Medicine at Quinnipiac University, North Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Medical Sciences, Frank H. Netter MD School of Medicine at Quinnipiac University, North Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Neurology, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
| | - Aaron P Turner
- Multiple Sclerosis Center for Excellence West, Veterans Affairs, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Rehabilitation Care Service, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Department of Rehabilitative Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jodie K Haselkorn
- Multiple Sclerosis Center for Excellence West, Veterans Affairs, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Rehabilitation Care Service, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Department of Rehabilitative Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Albert C Lo
- Mandell Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Mount Sinai Rehabilitation Hospital, Trinity Health Of New England, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
| | - Thomas Agresta
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
- Center for Quantitative Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pitteri M, Dapor C, Ziccardi S, Guandalini M, Meggiato R, Calabrese M. Visual-Attentional Load Unveils Slowed Processing Speed in Multiple Sclerosis Patients: A Pilot Study with a Tablet-Based Videogame. Brain Sci 2020; 10:E871. [PMID: 33218213 PMCID: PMC7699274 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci10110871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2020] [Revised: 11/04/2020] [Accepted: 11/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Slowing in information processing speed (IPS) is the key cognitive deficit in multiple sclerosis (MS). Testing IPS in different cognitive load conditions by using computerized tools might reveal initial IPS slowness underestimated by classic paper-and-pencil tests. To investigate the extent to which IPS can be affected by increased task demands, we developed three tasks based on the manipulation of the visual-attentional load, delivered with a home-made, tablet-based videogame. Fifty-one patients with MS (pwMS), classified as having no cognitive impairment in classic paper-and-pencil tests, and 20 healthy controls (HC) underwent the videogame tasks; reaction times (RTs) and accuracy were recorded. A significant reduced performance of pwMS as compared with HC was found on the videogame tasks, with pwMS being on average slower and less accurate than HC. Furthermore, pwMS showed a significantly more pronounced decrement in accuracy as a function of the visual-attentional load, suggesting a higher susceptibility to increased task demands. Significant correlations among the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) and the videogame mean RTs and accuracy were found, providing evidence for the concurrent validity of the videogame as a valid tool to test IPS in pwMS. The high potential that might derive from the adoption of computerized assessment tools in clinical practice should be taken into consideration and investigated further.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Pitteri
- Correspondence: (M.P.); (M.C.); Tel.: +39-045-8124678 (M.C.)
| | | | | | | | | | - Massimiliano Calabrese
- Neurology Section, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy; (C.D.); (S.Z.); (M.G.); (R.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lost in Classification: Lower Cognitive Functioning in Apparently Cognitive Normal Newly Diagnosed RRMS Patients. Brain Sci 2019; 9:brainsci9110321. [PMID: 31766124 PMCID: PMC6895881 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci9110321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2019] [Revised: 11/08/2019] [Accepted: 11/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Cognitive functioning in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients is usually related to the classic, dichotomic classification of impaired vs. unimpaired cognition. However, this approach is far from mirroring the real efficiency of cognitive functioning. Applying a different approach in which cognitive functioning is considered as a continuous variable, we aimed at showing that even newly diagnosed relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS) patients might suffer from reduced cognitive functioning with respect to a matched group of neurologically healthy controls (HCs), even if they were classified as having no cognitive impairment (CI). Fifty newly diagnosed RRMS patients and 36 HCs were tested with an extensive battery of neuropsychological tests. By using Z-scores applied to the whole group of RRMS and HCs together, a measure of cognitive functioning (Z-score index) was calculated. Among the 50 RRMS patients tested, 36 were classified as cognitively normal (CN). Even though classified as CN, RRMS patients performed worse than HCs at a global level (p = 0.004) and, more specifically, in the domains of memory (p = 0.005) and executive functioning (p = 0.006). These results highlight that reduced cognitive functioning can be present early in the disease course, even in patients without an evident CI. The current classification criteria of CI in MS should be considered with caution.
Collapse
|
6
|
Wojcik CM, Beier M, Costello K, DeLuca J, Feinstein A, Goverover Y, Gudesblatt M, Jaworski M, Kalb R, Kostich L, LaRocca NG, Rodgers JD, Benedict RH. Computerized neuropsychological assessment devices in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review. Mult Scler 2019; 25:1848-1869. [PMID: 31637963 PMCID: PMC6875828 DOI: 10.1177/1352458519879094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background: The proliferation of computerized neuropsychological assessment devices (CNADs) for screening and monitoring cognitive impairment is increasing exponentially. Previous reviews of computerized tests for multiple sclerosis (MS) were primarily qualitative and did not rigorously compare CNADs on psychometric properties. Objective: We aimed to systematically review the literature on the use of CNADs in MS and identify test batteries and single tests with good evidence for reliability and validity. Method: A search of four major online databases was conducted for publications related to computerized testing and MS. Test–retest reliability and validity coefficients and effect sizes were recorded for each CNAD test, along with administration characteristics. Results: We identified 11 batteries and 33 individual tests from 120 peer-reviewed articles meeting the inclusion criteria. CNADs with the strongest psychometric support include the CogState Brief Battery, Cognitive Drug Research Battery, NeuroTrax, CNS-Vital Signs, and computer-based administrations of the Symbol Digit Modalities Test. Conclusion: We identified several CNADs that are valid to screen for MS-related cognitive impairment, or to supplement full, conventional neuropsychological assessment. The necessity of testing with a technician, and in a controlled clinic/laboratory environment, remains uncertain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Curtis M Wojcik
- Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Meghan Beier
- Division of Rehabilitation Psychology and Neuropsychology, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - John DeLuca
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Department of Neurology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Anthony Feinstein
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Yael Goverover
- New York University, New York, NY, USA/South Shore Neurologic Associates, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Michael Jaworski
- Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Rosalind Kalb
- National Multiple Sclerosis Society, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lori Kostich
- The Mandell MS Center, Mount Sinai Rehabilitation Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA
| | | | - Jonathan D Rodgers
- Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA/Jacobs Neurological Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA/Canisius College, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Ralph Hb Benedict
- Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA/Jacobs Neurological Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Merlo D, Darby D, Kalincik T, Butzkueven H, van der Walt A. The feasibility, reliability and concurrent validity of the MSReactor computerized cognitive screening tool in multiple sclerosis. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2019; 12:1756286419859183. [PMID: 31320932 PMCID: PMC6628542 DOI: 10.1177/1756286419859183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2018] [Accepted: 05/31/2019] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) cognitive tests are resource intensive and limited by
practice effects that prevent frequent retesting. Brief, reliable and valid
monitoring tools are urgently needed to detect subtle, subclinical cognitive
changes in people with MS. Cognitive monitoring over time could contribute
to a new definition of disease progression, supplementing routine clinical
monitoring. Methods: MSReactor is a web-based battery that measures psychomotor (processing)
speed, visual attention and working memory, using simple reaction time
tasks. Clinic-based tasks were completed at baseline and 6 monthly with home
testing 1–3 monthly. Acceptability, quality of life, depression and anxiety
surveys were completed. We studied its correlation with the Symbol Digit
Modalities Test, practice effects, test–retest reliability and the
discriminative ability of MSReactor. Results: A total of 450 people with MS were recruited over 18 months, with 81% opting
to complete home-based testing. Most participants (96%) would be happy (or
neutral) to repeat the tasks again and just four reported the tasks made
them ‘very anxious’. Persistence of home testing was high and practice
effects stabilized within three tests. MSReactor tasks correlated with
Symbol Digit Modalities Test scores and participants with MS performed
slower than healthy controls. Conclusion: MSReactor is a scalable and reliable cognitive screening tool that can be
used in the clinic and remotely. MSReactor task performance correlated with
another highly validated cognitive test, was sensitive to MS and baseline
predictors of cognitive performance were identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Merlo
- Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Level 6, 99 Commercial Road, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia
| | - David Darby
- Eastern Clinical Research Unit, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Tomas Kalincik
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Helmut Butzkueven
- Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Anneke van der Walt
- Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|