Tumor and nodal staging of colon cancer: accuracy of preoperative computed tomography at a Swedish high-volume center

High-performance CT features supporting accurate pre-operative tumor staging in colon cancer

Background and aims

Accurate pre-treatment tumor staging is essential for treatment decision-making. Multi-slice spiral computed tomography (CT) is currently the standard method for pre-operative clinical tumor staging, but accurately applying the CT findings in tumor staging remains a challenge due to the poor pathological understanding of the CT signs. We aimed to pathologically interpret the key CT findings in order to identify reliable markers for pre-treatment staging of colon cancer.

Patients and methods

The following CT features from 136 colon adenocarcinomas were analyzed: colon wall pliability, outline contour, pericolic fat attenuations and vascularity, tumor fusion with adjacent organs, ascites, tumor size, and relevance between tumor and retroperitoneal fascia. These CT features were corroborated with histopathological findings. The diagnostic performance of these was further analyzed.

Results

Based on the postoperative pathological tumor staging (pT), 136 colon adenocarcinomas were classified into four stages: pT1 (n = 5), pT2 (n = 7), pT3 (n = 96), and pT4 (n = 28). Key findings include the following: (1) soft colon wall is a characteristic of the pT1 tumors, whereas stiff colon wall is a characteristic of the pT2~pT4 tumors; pathologically, stiff colon wall reflects the infiltration of tumor cells with desmoplastic reaction (DR) in muscularis propria; (2) small protuberances may help exclude the pT2 tumors. Histopathologically, small protuberances in pT2 cancer represent the pure DR on the surface of lamina propria, whereas the small protuberances in pT3~pT4 cancers represent the sub-serosal or extra-serosal cancer cell foci enwrapped by DR; (3) the presence of large protuberances, extensive reticulonodular fat stranding, and fusion with surrounding organs and ascites are diagnostic of pT4 tumors; and (4) the presence of extra-fascial nodules/streaks on CT scan could accurately diagnose the ascending/descending colon cancer of pT4 stage. Histologically, the presence of the above five CT features (large protuberances, extensive reticulonodular fat stranding, fusion with surrounding organs, ascites, and extra-fascial nodules/streaks) reflect the farther and deeper infiltration of tumor cells in serosa or retroperitoneal fascia involvement.

Conclusion

Our studies have identified multiple CT features that are practically useful in identifying and differentiating different stages of colon cancer prior to surgical procedures. These high-performance markers will provide valuable insights to the clinicians in making appropriate decisions in the management of patients with colon cancer.

Small arteriole sign: an imaging feature for staging T4a colon cancer

OBJECTIVES

By analyzing the distribution of existing and newly proposed staging imaging features in pT1-3 and pT4a tumors, we searched for a salient feature and validated its diagnostic performance.

METHODS

Preoperative multiphase contrast-enhanced CT images of the training cohort were retrospectively collected at three centers from January 2016 to December 2017. We used the chi-square test to analyze the distribution of several stage-related imaging features in pT1-3 and pT4a tumors, including small arteriole sign (SAS), outer edge of the intestine, tumor invasion range, and peritumoral adipose tissue. Preoperative multiphase contrast-enhanced CT images of the validation cohort were retrospectively collected at Beijing Cancer Hospital from January 2018 to December 2018. The diagnostic performance of the selected imaging feature, including accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, was validated and compared with the conventional clinical tumor stage (cT) by the McNemar test.

RESULTS

In the training cohort, a total of 268 patients were enrolled, and only SAS was significantly different between pT1-3 and pT4a tumors. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the SAS and conventional cT in differentiating T1-3 and T4a tumors were 94.4%, 81.6%, and 97.3% and 53.7%, 32.7%, and 58.4%, respectively (all p < 0.001). In the validation cohort, a total of 135 patients were collected. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the SAS and the conventional cT were 93.3%, 76.2%, and 96.5% and 62.2%, 38.1%, and 66.7%, respectively (p < 0.001, p = 0.021, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Small arteriole sign positivity, an indirect imaging feature of serosa invasion, may improve the accuracy of identifying T4a colon cancer.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Small arteriole sign helps to distinguish T1-3 and T4a colon cancer and further improves the accuracy of preoperative CT staging of colon cancer.

KEY POINTS

• The accuracy of preoperative CT staging of colon cancer is not ideal, especially for T4a tumors. • Small arteriole sign (SAS) is a newly defined imaging feature that shows the appearance of tumor-supplying arterioles at the site where they penetrate the intestine wall. • SAS is an indirect imaging marker of tumor invasion into the serosa with a great value in distinguishing between T1-3 and T4a colon cancer.

Effect of laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision combined with immunotherapy and its impact on immune function and tumor markers in elderly patients with colon cancer

Objective

To determine the effect of laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision combined with immunotherapy and its impact on immune function and tumor markers in elderly patients with colon cancer.

Methods

This is a clinical comparative study. Eighty elderly patients with colon cancer hospitalized in the No.2 Hospital of Baoding from May 2020 to May 2022 were randomly divided into two groups, with 40 cases in each group. Patients in the study group received laparoscopic complete mesocolic resection combined with ubenimex orally. While patients in the control group received routine open surgery. The surgical indexes, surgical complications, and the changes of immune molecules and tumor markers before and after treatment were compared between the two groups.

Results

The amount of intraoperative bleeding, retention time of drainage tube and postoperative length of stay in the hospital in the study group were significantly better than those in the control group (p=0.000). The incision length of the study group was significantly shorter than that of the control group, the number of lymph nodes removed during the operation was significantly higher than that of the control group, and the incidence of surgical complications was significantly lower than that of the control group (p<0.05). After treatment, the levels of immune molecules in the study group were remarkably higher than those in the control group (p<0.05), while the levels of tumor markers were much lower than those in the latter group (p=0.000).

Conclusion

Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision combined with immunotherapy exhibits a superior therapeutic effect to traditional open surgery in elderly patients with colon cancer, and is worthy of clinical promotion.

The usefulness of preoperative CT in colon cancer staging: impact of radiologists' experience

PURPOSE

To assess the agreement between radiologists in the detection of specific features related to T- and N-stage and evaluate accuracy in colon cancer staging.

METHODS

Patients who underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) before surgery were enrolled and evaluated by three radiologists with different experience. Pathological data were used as the reference standard. Tumor location, presence of tumor bulging, fat stranding, lateroconal fascia invasion, enlarged vessels, axial short diameter of the biggest node, shape, enhancement pattern, intranodal necrosis, and cluster were collected. Reliability analysis was performed with κ statistics and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Logistic regressions were used to determine independent predictors associated with staging.

RESULTS

Seventy five patients were evaluated. The reliability analysis was moderate to substantial for tumor location (κ = 0.853), T staging (κ = 0.531), tumor bulging (κ = 0.478), fat stranding (κ = 0.490), lateroconal fascia invasion (κ = 0.436), enlarged vessels (κ = 0.401), the axial short diameter of the biggest node (ICC = 0.732), shape (κ = 0.484), enhancement pattern (κ = 0.431), intranodal necrosis (κ = 0.606), and cluster (κ = 0.358). For all readers, sensitivity was higher for T3 lesions (60-69%) and specificity was higher for T2 and T4 lesions (84.5-90.0% and 82.4-85.1%). The diagnostic accuracy was acceptable for all lesions and among all readers (50.7-92.1%). The lateroconal fascia invasion and enlarged vessels resulted as independent predictor factors (OR = 3.292 and OR = 2.651) for T staging, while nodes' cluster and dimension as independent predictor factors of N staging [OR = 3.798 and OR = 1.083].

CONCLUSION

Reader's experience is one of the most important factors associated with the correct classification of colon cancer. Moreover, CECT can help depict radiological features independently associated with the T and N stages.

Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging staging of tumour and nodal stage in rectal cancer treated by primary surgery: a population-based study

AIM

The preoperative stage of rectal cancer is an important prognostic factor affecting treatment recommendations. Currently, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used for clinical staging to identify patients who should be recommended for neoadjuvant oncological treatment. The aim of this work was to investigate the accuracy of the preoperative T- and N-stage and also involvement of the mesorectal fascia (MRF) as determined by MRI in a Swedish national cohort.

METHOD

Patients who had undergone resectional surgery for rectal cancer without neoadjuvant treatment in Sweden in the period 2013-2017 were identified through the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry (n = 2062). The T- and N-stage determined by preoperative MRI were compared with the histopathological results. The MRI-assessed MRF status was compared with the circumferential resection margin.

RESULTS

Sensitivity for differentiating T1-2 from T3-4 was 69% and specificity 77%. Sensitivity to detect N1-2 was 42% and specificity 81%. Sensitivity for MRF positivity was 50% and specificity 92%. Agreement analysed by weighted kappa analysis was 0.47 for T-stage [confidence interval (CI) 0.44-0.51], 0.24 for N-stage (CI 0.19-0.24) and 0.20 for MRF status (CI 0.12-0.29).

CONCLUSION

In this study, accuracy of the preoperative MRI was lower than expected for rectal cancers. Overstaging might lead to potentially harmful neoadjuvant treatment and understaging can lead to a higher risk of tumour recurrence. The results of this study show that efforts should be made to increase the accuracy of the preoperative evaluation in order to optimize treatment recommendations.

National differences in implementation of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer and the influence on short-term outcomes

Background

The timing and degree of implementation of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for colorectal cancer vary among countries. Insights in national differences regarding implementation of new surgical techniques and the effect on postoperative outcomes are important for quality assurance, can show potential areas for country-specific improvement, and might be illustrative and supportive for similar implementation programs in other countries. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate differences in patient selection, applied techniques, and results of minimal invasive surgery for colorectal cancer between the Netherlands and Sweden.

Methods

Patients who underwent elective minimally invasive surgery for T1-3 colon or rectal cancer (2012–2018) registered in the Dutch ColoRectal Audit or Swedish ColoRectal Cancer Registry were included. Time trends in the application of MIS were determined. Outcomes were compared for time periods with a similar level of MIS implementation (Netherlands 2012–2013 versus Sweden 2017–2018). Multilevel analyses were performed to identify factors associated with adverse short-term outcomes.

Results

A total of 46,095 Dutch and 8,819 Swedish patients undergoing MIS for colorectal cancer were included. In Sweden, MIS implementation was approximately 5 years later than in the Netherlands, with more robotic surgery and lower volumes per hospital. Although conversion rates were higher in Sweden, oncological and surgical outcomes were comparable. MIS in the Netherlands for the years 2012–2013 resulted in a higher reoperation rate for colon cancer and a higher readmission rate but lower non-surgical complication rates for rectal cancer if compared with MIS in Sweden during 2017–2018.

Conclusion

This study showed that the implementation of MIS for colorectal cancer occurred later in Sweden than the Netherlands, with comparable outcomes despite lower volumes. Our study demonstrates that new surgical techniques can be implemented at a national level in a controlled and safe way, with thorough quality assurance.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-021-08974-1.

The Impact of Patient Characteristics and Tumor Biology on the Accuracy of Preoperative Staging of Colon Cancer in Denmark. A Nationwide Cohort Study

Simple Summary

The roles of mismatch repair and other colon tumor characteristics were investigated in a nationwide registry study with data extracted from the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group. Mismatch repair can arise during DNA replication. In this study, 6102 patients were included with a median age of 72 (range 23–97 years). The mismatch repair was deficient in 24% and proficient in 76%. Mismatch repair deficiency impacted the accuracy of the preoperative staging of colon cancer. In the future, mismatch repair status should be taken into consideration in the clinical staging of colon cancer.

Abstract

Background: Colon cancer is a common disease in western populations. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency and other patient and tumor characteristics on the accuracy of preoperative staging by comparing histopathological T- and N-categories of the resected specimen with the preoperative clinical stage in a nationwide cohort of patients treated for colon cancer by elective bowel resection with curative intent. Methods: A register study of a cohort extracted from the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG) database, which holds prospective data on all new cases of colon and rectum cancer in Denmark. Patients diagnosed with colon cancer and treated with an elective bowel resection with curative intent in the years 2016–2019 were analyzed. Results: A total of 6102 patients were included (n = 3161 (52%) men and n = 2941 (48%) women) with a median age of 72 years (range 23–97 years). MMR was deficient in 24% of the patients and proficient in 76%. MMR deficiency, tumor sidedness and histopathological type were significant predictors of the accuracy of preoperative staging of colon cancer in univariate and multivariate analysis. MMR status in particular showed a strong impact on the risk of overstaging. Conclusions: MMR deficiency, but also tumor sidedness and to some degree histopathological type, impacted the accuracy of preoperative staging of colon cancer. MMR status should be taken into consideration in everyday clinical staging.

Clinical TNM staging for esophageal, gastric, and colorectal cancers in the era of neoadjuvant therapy: A systematic review of the literature

AIM

Clinical staging is vital for selecting appropriate candidates and designing neoadjuvant treatment strategies for advanced tumors. The aim of this review was to evaluate diagnostic abilities of clinical TNM staging for gastrointestinal, gastrointestinal cancers.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of recent publications to evaluate the accuracy of diagnostic modalities on gastrointestinal cancers. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE using the keywords "TNM staging," "T4 staging," "distant metastases," "esophageal cancer," "gastric cancer," and "colorectal cancer," and the search terms used in Cochrane Reviews between January 2005 to July 2020. Articles focusing on preoperative diagnosis of: (a) depth of invasion; (b) lymph node metastases; and (c) distant metastases were selected.

RESULTS

After a full-text search, a final set of 55 studies (17 esophageal cancer studies, 26 gastric cancer studies, and 12 colorectal cancer studies) were used to evaluate the accuracy of clinical TNM staging. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were the best modalities to assess distant metastases. Fat and fiber mode of CT may be useful for T4 staging of esophageal cancer, CT was a partially reliable modality for lymph node staging in gastric cancer, and CT combined with MRI was the most reliable modality for liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

CONCLUSION

The most reliable diagnostic modality differed among gastrointestinal cancers depending on the type of cancer. Therefore, we propose diagnostic algorithms for clinical staging for each type of cancer.