1
|
Bovonratwet P, Song J, LaValva SM, Chen AZ, Ondeck NT, Blevins JL, Su EP. Telemedicine in Arthroplasty Patients: Which Factors Are Associated With High Satisfaction? Arthroplast Today 2024; 25:101285. [PMID: 38261888 PMCID: PMC10796800 DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Revised: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Background During the initial coronavirus pandemic lockdown period, remote hip and knee arthroplasty care was heavily employed out of necessity. However, data on patient satisfaction with telemedicine specific to hip and knee arthroplasty patients remains unknown. Methods All patients who had a telemedicine visit in the hip and knee arthroplasty department and completed a telemedicine satisfaction survey at a specialty hospital from April 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020, were identified. Patient satisfaction with telemedicine, gauged through a series of questions, were analyzed and evaluated over time. Independent factors associated with high satisfaction, defined as the "Top Box" response to the survey question "Likelihood of your recommending our video visit service to others," were identified. Results Overall, 29,003 patients who had an in-person or telemedicine visit in the hip and knee arthroplasty department during the study period were identified. During the initial coronavirus pandemic lockdown period, defined as April 1, 2020-May 31, 2020, rate of overall telemedicine utilization was approximately 84%. After the initial lockdown period, the rate of overall telemedicine utilization was approximately 8% of all visits per month. Average satisfaction scores for a series of 14 questions were consistently above 4.5 out of 5. Multivariable regression revealed younger age, particularly 18-64 years old, to be the only independent factor associated with high satisfaction with telemedicine. The rate of high satisfaction remained statistically similar throughout the study period (P > .05). Conclusions Patient satisfaction with telemedicine was consistently high in various domains and remained high throughout the study period, regardless of loosened pandemic restrictions. This technology will most likely continue to be utilized, but perhaps it should be targeted at patients younger than 65 years of age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patawut Bovonratwet
- The Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Junho Song
- The Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Scott M. LaValva
- The Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Aaron Z. Chen
- The Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nathaniel T. Ondeck
- The Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jason L. Blevins
- The Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Edwin P. Su
- The Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Restrepo JA, Henriquez R, Torre D, Graber ML. The physical exam and telehealth: between past and future. Diagnosis (Berl) 2024; 11:1-3. [PMID: 38033192 DOI: 10.1515/dx-2023-0154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge A Restrepo
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, FL, USA
- Department of Education, Orlando VA Healthcare System, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Richard Henriquez
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, FL, USA
- Department of Education, Orlando VA Healthcare System, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Dario Torre
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, FL, USA
- Department of Education, Orlando VA Healthcare System, Orlando, FL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bovonratwet P, Chen AZ, Song J, Morse KW, Shafi KA, Amen TB, Dowdell JE, Sheha ED, Qureshi SA, Iyer S. Telemedicine in Spine Patients: Utilization and Satisfaction Remain High Even After Easing of COVID-19 Lockdown Restrictions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2024; 49:208-213. [PMID: 36856548 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 03/02/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE The objectives of the present study were to (1) define telemedicine utilization rates during and after the initial height of the COVID-19 lockdown period and (2) determine patient satisfaction with telemedicine during and after the initial height of the COVID-19 lockdown period for spine patients at an orthopedic specialty hospital. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Previous studies have shown high patient satisfaction with telemedicine during the initial height of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there exists limited data about spine telemedicine utilization and patient satisfaction after the reopening of in-person office visits and the easing of restrictions on elective surgical care. MATERIALS AND METHODS All patients who had an in-person or telemedicine visit at an urban tertiary specialty hospital from April 1, 2020 to April 15, 2021 were identified. Rates of overall telemedicine utilization over time were delineated. Patient satisfaction with telemedicine, as assessed through a series of questionnaires, was also evaluated over time. RESULTS Overall, 60,368 patients were identified. Of these, 19,568 patients (32.4%) had telemedicine visit. During the peak initial coronavirus lockdown period, the rate of overall telemedicine utilization, on average, was greater than 90%. After the peak period, the rate of overall telemedicine utilization on average was at ~29% of all visits per month. The percentage of patients who would have been definitely comfortable if the telemedicine visit had been in-person increased over the entire study period ( P <0.001). Despite this, patient satisfaction based on survey responses remained statistically similar throughout the study period ( P >0.05). CONCLUSION The rate of telemedicine utilization in spine patients remains high, at ~one-third of all visits, even after the initial peak coronavirus lockdown period. In addition, patient satisfaction with telemedicine remained consistent throughout the study period, regardless of pandemic restrictions on in-person visits. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.
Collapse
|
4
|
Das L, Sharma PK, Singh G, Goyal T. Telerehabilitation is as effective as outpatient visits in the management of early osteoarthritis knee and mechanical low backache. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY & TRAUMATOLOGY : ORTHOPEDIE TRAUMATOLOGIE 2024; 34:405-413. [PMID: 37566137 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-023-03673-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Teleconsultation services can be used to overcome the barriers imposed by the Covid-19 pandemic in providing basic orthopaedic rehabilitation services. Aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness of rehabilitation provided via outpatient and teleconsultation in patients with mechanical low backache (LBA) and early osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee joint utilizing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. The satisfaction level of patients receiving teleconsultation will also be assessed. METHODOLOGY This study was a hospital-based prospective observational study. The study's participants were divided into two groups (Outpatient and Teleconsultation, respectively), and each group was further divided into two subgroups of 100 participants each (Knee-pain subgroup 1; LBA subgroup 2). SF-12 questionnaire, visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain, and functional outcome scores (KOOS score for knee pain and the modified Oswestry Disability Index-MODI for LBA) were assessed at initial presentation and 6 months follow-up. Participants' satisfaction for teleconsultation service was assessed at final follow-up by 5 points Likert scale (5, very satisfied; 1, very dissatisfied). RESULTS Mean consultation time was significantly longer in the outpatient group (p < 0.001). No statistically significant difference in the VAS score, KOOS score (58.0 ± 7.6 vs. 57.8 ± 9.2; p = 0.893), and MODI Score (24.7 ± 13.3 vs. 27.4 ± 12.4; p = 0.128) between the corresponding subgroups of the two groups at final follow-up. Eighty-seven percentage of the participants were satisfied (Likert score ≥ 4) with the teleconsultation services. CONCLUSION Teleconsultation is equally effective to that as face-to-face outpatient consultation in the rehabilitation of patients with early OA knee and mechanical LBA. LEVEL OF STUDY Level 2, Prospective comparative study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lakshmana Das
- Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda , Punjab, 151001, India
| | - Pankaj Kumar Sharma
- Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda , Punjab, 151001, India
| | - Gaganpreet Singh
- Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda , Punjab, 151001, India
| | - Tarun Goyal
- Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda , Punjab, 151001, India.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ye IB, Thomson AE, Chowdhury N, Oster B, Miseo VS, Jauregui JJ, Cavanaugh D, Koh E, Gelb D, Ludwig S. Telemedicine Improves Access to Care for Spine Patients With Low Socioeconomic Status. Global Spine J 2024; 14:49-55. [PMID: 35403457 PMCID: PMC9006097 DOI: 10.1177/21925682221092398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES The objective of this study is to compare the likelihood of missing a scheduled telemedicine and in-person appointments for spine patients. The secondary objective is to assess the impact of socioeconomic status on missed telemedicine and in-person appointments. METHODS Patients with scheduled outpatient appointments with orthopedic spine faculty between 2019 and 2021 were divided by appointment type: telemedicine (N = 4,387) and in-person (N = 3810). Socioeconomic status was assessed using Area Deprivation Index (ADI) stratified based on percentile: low (<25), medium (25-75), and high (>75) levels of socioeconomic disadvantage. The primary outcome measure was missed clinic appointments, which was defined as having at least one appointment that was cancelled or labeled "no show." RESULTS Patients with in-person appointments missed appointments more often than patients with telemedicine visits (51.3% vs 24.7%, P < .001). Patients with high ADI missed their in-person appointments more often than patients with medium and low ADI (59.5% vs 52.2% and 47.5%, P < .001). There was no difference in missed telemedicine visits between patients with high, medium, and low ADI (27.6% vs 24.8% vs 23.8%, P = .294). Patients that missed an appointment were 41.9% more likely to be high ADI (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.20-1.68, P < .001) and 13.4% more likely to be medium ADI (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.03-1.26, P = .015) compared with low ADI patients. CONCLUSIONS Telemedicine may serve a role in reducing disparity in appointment attendance. While further studies are needed to validate these findings, spine surgeons should consider offering telemedicine as an option to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivan B. Ye
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Alexandra E. Thomson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Navid Chowdhury
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Brittany Oster
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Vincent S. Miseo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Julio J. Jauregui
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Daniel Cavanaugh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Eugene Koh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Daniel Gelb
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Steven Ludwig
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Antonacci G, Benevento E, Bonavitacola S, Cannavacciuolo L, Foglia E, Fusi G, Garagiola E, Ponsiglione C, Stefanini A. Healthcare professional and manager perceptions on drivers, benefits, and challenges of telemedicine: results from a cross-sectional survey in the Italian NHS. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:1115. [PMID: 37853448 PMCID: PMC10585875 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10100-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Covid-19 pandemic provided new challenges and opportunities for patients and healthcare providers while accelerating the trend of digital healthcare transformation. This study explores the perspectives of healthcare professionals and managers on (i) drivers to the implementation of telemedicine services and (ii) perceived benefits and challenges related to the use of telemedicine across the Italian National Health Service. METHODS An online cross-sectional survey was distributed to professionals working within 308 healthcare organisations in different Italian regions. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected through a self-administered questionnaire (June-September 2021). Responses were analysed using summary statistics and thematic analysis. RESULTS Key factors driving the adoption of telemedicine have been grouped into (i) organisational drivers (reduce the virus spread-80%; enhance care quality and efficiency-61%), (ii) technological drivers (ease of use-82%; efficacy and reliability-64%; compliance with data governance regulations-64%) and (iii) regulatory drivers (regulations' semplification-84%). Nearly all respondents perceive telemedicine as useful in improving patient care (96%). The main benefits reported by respondents are shorter waiting lists, reduced Emergency Department attendance, decreased patient and clinician travel, and more frequent patient-doctor interactions. However, only 7% of respondents believe that telemedicine services are more effective than traditional care and 66% of the healthcare professionals believe that telemedicine can't completely substitute in-person visits due to challenges with physical examination and patient-doctor relationships. Other reported challenges include poor quality and interoperability of telemedicine platforms and scarce integration of telemedicine with traditional care services. Moreover, healthcare professionals believe that some groups of patients experience difficulties in accessing and using the technologies due to socio-cultural factors, technological and linguistic challenges and the absence of caregivers. CONCLUSIONS Respondents believe that telemedicine can be useful to complement and augment traditional care. However, many challenges still need to be overcome to fully consider telemedicine a standard of care. Strategies that could help address these challenges include additional regulations on data governance and reimbursements, evidence-based guidelines for the use of telemedicine, greater integration of tools and processes, patient-centred training for clinicians, patient-facing material to assist patients in navigating virtual sessions, different language options, and greater involvement of caregivers in the care process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grazia Antonacci
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) Northwest London, London, UK.
- Business School, Centre for Health Economics and Policy Innovation (CHEPI), Imperial College London, London, UK.
| | - Elisabetta Benevento
- Department of Energy, Systems, Territory and Construction Engineering, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | | | - Emanuela Foglia
- Healthcare Datascience LAB, LIUC- Carlo Cattaneo University, Castellanza, VA, Italy
| | - Giulia Fusi
- LIUC- Cattaneo University, Castellanza, VA, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Garagiola
- Healthcare Datascience LAB, LIUC- Carlo Cattaneo University, Castellanza, VA, Italy
| | - Cristina Ponsiglione
- Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Alessandro Stefanini
- Department of Energy, Systems, Territory and Construction Engineering, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- School of Economics and Business, Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas, Lithuania
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tenforde AS, Alexander JJ, Alexander M, Annaswamy TM, Carr CJ, Chang P, Díaz M, Iaccarino MA, Lewis SB, Millett C, Pandit S, Ramirez CP, Rinaldi R, Roop M, Slocum CS, Tekmyster G, Venesy D, Verduzco-Gutierrez M, Zorowitz RD, Rowland TR. Telehealth in PM&R: Past, present, and future in clinical practice and opportunities for translational research. PM R 2023; 15:1156-1174. [PMID: 37354209 DOI: 10.1002/pmrj.13029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Revised: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/26/2023]
Abstract
Telehealth refers to the use of telecommunication devices and other forms of technology to provide services outside of the traditional in-person health care delivery system. Growth in the use of telehealth creates new challenges and opportunities for implementation in clinical practice. The American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (AAPM&R) assembled an expert group to develop a white paper to examine telehealth innovation in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PM&R). The resultant white paper summarizes how telehealth is best used in the field of PM&R while highlighting current knowledge deficits and technological limitations. The report identifies new and transformative opportunities for PM&R to advance translational research related to telehealth and enhance patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam S Tenforde
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Spaulding Rehabilitation, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Joshua J Alexander
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Marcalee Alexander
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Thiru M Annaswamy
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Conley J Carr
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Philip Chang
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | - Mary A Iaccarino
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Spaulding Rehabilitation, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Stephen B Lewis
- Physiatry-Pharmacy Collaborative, NJ Institute for Successful Aging, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
| | - Carolyn Millett
- American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rosemont, Illinois, USA
| | | | | | - Robert Rinaldi
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Megan Roop
- American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rosemont, Illinois, USA
| | - Chloe S Slocum
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Spaulding Rehabilitation, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Gene Tekmyster
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | - Monica Verduzco-Gutierrez
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Richard D Zorowitz
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, MedStar National Rehabilitation Network, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yılmaz HG, Büyükaslan A, Kuşvuran A, Turan Z, Tuna F, Tunc H, Özdoğan S. A New Clinical Tool for Scoliosis Risk Analysis: Scoliosis Tele-Screening Test. Asian Spine J 2023; 17:656-665. [PMID: 37226382 PMCID: PMC10460665 DOI: 10.31616/asj.2022.0299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2022] [Revised: 10/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 05/26/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Methodological, observational clinical study. PURPOSE This study aimed to develop a virtual screening test to detect scoliosis risk initially by parents without the need for medical visit during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE The scoliosis screening program has been implemented to early detect scoliosis. Unfortunately, access to health professionals was limited during the pandemic. However, during this time, interest in telemedicine has increased remarkably. Recently, mobile applications related to postural analysis were developed, but none permits evaluation by parents. METHODS Researchers developed the Scoliosis Tele-Screening Test (STS-Test), which included drawing-based images of body asymmetries, to assess the scoliosis-associated risk factors. The STS-Test was shared on social networks, allowing the parents to evaluate their children. After test completion, the risk score was generated automatically, and children with medium and high risks were then advised for medical consultation for further evaluation. The test accuracy and consistency between the clinician and parents were also analyzed. RESULTS Of the 865 tested children, 358 (41.4%) consulted clinicians to confirm their STS-Test results. Scoliosis was then confirmed in 91 children (25.4%). The parents were able to detect asymmetry in 50% of the lumbar/thoracolumbar curvatures and 82% of the thoracic curvatures. In addition, the forward bend test revealed favorable agreement between parents and clinicians (r =0.809, p<0.0005). Internal consistency of the esthetic deformities domain in the STS-Test was also excellent (α=0.901). This tool was 94.97% accurate, 83.51% sensitive, and 98.87% specific. CONCLUSIONS The STS-Test is a new parent-friendly, virtual, cost-effective, result-oriented, and reliable tool for scoliosis screening. It allows parents to actively participate in the early detection of scoliosis by screening their children for the risk of scoliosis periodically without the need to visit the health institution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ahsen Büyükaslan
- Formed Healthcare Scoliosis Treatment and Brace Center, Istanbul, Turkey
- Institute of Kinesiology, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Aslihan Kuşvuran
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Toros University, Mersin, Turkey
| | - Zeynep Turan
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Koç University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Filiz Tuna
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey
| | - Hande Tunc
- Formed Healthcare Scoliosis Treatment and Brace Center, Istanbul, Turkey
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Sibel Özdoğan
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Medstar Antalya Hospital, Antalya, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Riew GJ, Lovecchio F, Samartzis D, Louie PK, Germscheid N, An H, Cheung JPY, Chutkan N, Mallow GM, Neva MH, Phillips FM, Sciubba D, El-Sharkawi M, Valacco M, McCarthy MH, Makhni MC, Iyer S. Telemedicine in Spine Surgery: Global Perspectives and Practices. Global Spine J 2023; 13:1200-1211. [PMID: 34121482 PMCID: PMC10416595 DOI: 10.1177/21925682211022311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Cross-sectional, anonymous, international survey. OBJECTIVES The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in the rapid adoption of telemedicine in spine surgery. This study sought to determine the extent of adoption and global perspectives on telemedicine in spine surgery. METHODS All members of AO Spine International were emailed an anonymous survey covering the participant's experiences with and perceptions of telemedicine. Descriptive statistics were used to depict responses. Responses were compared among regions. RESULTS 485 spine surgeons participated in the survey. Telemedicine usage rose from <10.0% to >39.0% of all visits. A majority of providers (60.5%) performed at least one telemedicine visit. The format of "telemedicine" varied widely by region: European (50.0%) and African (45.2%) surgeons were more likely to use phone calls, whereas North (66.7%) and South American (77.0%) surgeons more commonly used video (P < 0.001). North American providers used telemedicine the most during COVID-19 (>60.0% of all visits). 81.9% of all providers "agreed/strongly agreed" telemedicine was easy to use. Respondents tended to "agree" that imaging review, the initial appointment, and postoperative care could be performed using telemedicine. Almost all (95.4%) surgeons preferred at least one in-person visit prior to the day of surgery. CONCLUSION Our study noted significant geographical differences in the rate of telemedicine adoption and the platform of telemedicine utilized. The results suggest a significant increase in telemedicine utilization, particularly in North America. Spine surgeons found telemedicine feasible for imaging review, initial visits, and follow-up visits although the vast majority still preferred at least one in-person preoperative visit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grant J. Riew
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Francis Lovecchio
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dino Samartzis
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
- The International Spine Research and Innovation Initiative, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Philip K. Louie
- Neuroscience Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Howard An
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
- The International Spine Research and Innovation Initiative, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jason Pui Yin Cheung
- Department of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Norman Chutkan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Gary Michael Mallow
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
- The International Spine Research and Innovation Initiative, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Marko H. Neva
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Frank M. Phillips
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
- The International Spine Research and Innovation Initiative, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Daniel Sciubba
- Department of Neurosurgery, John Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mohammad El-Sharkawi
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Assiut University Medical School, Assiut, Egypt
| | - Marcelo Valacco
- Department of Orthopaedics, Churruca Hospital de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Michael H. McCarthy
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Melvin C. Makhni
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sravisht Iyer
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Eckley MJ, Hsu C, Tenforde AS. Feasibility Using Telehealth for Planning Use of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy in a Sports Medicine Clinic. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:healthcare11111574. [PMID: 37297714 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11111574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Revised: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: The purpose of this study is to describe whether telehealth compared with in-person visits, led to a similar agreement of primary diagnosis reached at the time of procedure using extracorporeal shockwave therapy. (2) Methods: This retrospective study consisted of chart reviews of all new patients evaluated in a sports medicine clinic prior to performing extracorporeal shockwave therapy from April 2020 to March 2021. The primary outcome of the study was describing agreement in primary diagnosis at the time of evaluation (telehealth and in-person) and during the procedure using extracorporeal shockwave therapy. Logistic regression was utilized to identify patient characteristics that may predict agreement of diagnosis using telehealth. (3) Results: The chart review identified 166 patients (45 telehealth and 121 in-person) evaluated for extracorporeal shockwave therapy. Agreement of diagnosis was similar for patients evaluated using telehealth compared to in-person visits (84% vs. 92%, Χ2 = 1.90, p = 0.168). Agreement on diagnosis was more likely in patients who started shockwave within the 1 week of initial visit (OR = 8.27, 95% CI = 1.69-45.29), patients over age 60 (OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.90-0.99), and in patients without a history of osteoarthritis (OR = 14.00, 95% CI = 1.88-113.46). (4) Conclusions: Telehealth resulted in a similar agreement to in-person visits to identify a primary diagnosis for planning extracorporeal shockwave therapy. Telehealth may be a reasonable alternative to in-person visits for procedural planning of extracorporeal shockwave therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marissa J Eckley
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Connie Hsu
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Adam S Tenforde
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
The Future of Spine Care Innovation-Software not Hardware: How the Digital Transformation Will Change Spine Care Delivery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2023; 48:73-78. [PMID: 36149861 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2022] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Narrative review. OBJECTIVE The aim was to utilize the lessons from the digital transformation of industries beyond healthcare, weigh the changing forces within the healthcare ecosystem, and provide a framework for the likely state of spine care delivery in the future. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Advances in technology have transformed the way in which we as consumers interact with most products and services, driven by devices, platforms, and a dramatic increase in the availability of digital data. Spine care delivery, and much of healthcare in general, has lagged far behind, hamstrung by regulatory limitations, narrow data networks, limited digital platforms, and cultural attachment to legacy care delivery models. METHODS The authors present a narrative review of the current state of the spine field in this dynamic and evolving environment. RESULTS The past several decades of spine innovation have largely been driven by "hardware" improvements, such as instrumentation, devices, and enabling technologies to facilitate procedures. These changes, while numerous, have largely resulted in modest incremental improvements in clinical outcomes. The next phase of growth in spine care, however, is likely to be more reflective of the broader innovation ecosystem that has already transformed most other industries, characterized by improvements in "software," including: (1) leveraging data analytics with growing electronic health records databases to optimize interactions between patients and providers, (2) expanding digital and telemedicine platforms to create integrated hybrid service lines, (3) data modeling for patient and provider decision aids, (4) deploying provider and service line performance metrics to improve quality, and (5) movement toward more free market dynamics as patients increasingly move beyond legacy limited health system networks. CONCLUSION Spine care stakeholders should familiarize themselves with the concepts discussed in this review, as they create value for patients and are also likely to dramatically shift the spine care delivery landscape.
Collapse
|
12
|
Anvari S, Neumark S, Jangra R, Sandre A, Pasumarthi K, Xenodemetropoulos T. Best Practices for the Provision of Virtual Care: A Systematic Review of Current Guidelines. Telemed J E Health 2023; 29:3-22. [PMID: 35532969 DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2022.0004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Telemedicine has emerged as a feasible adjunct to in-person care in multiple clinical contexts, and its role has expanded in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there exists a general paucity of information surrounding best practice recommendations for conducting specialty or disease-specific virtual care. The purpose of this study was to systematically review existing best practice guidelines for conducting telemedicine encounters. Methods: A systematic review of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) of existing guidelines for the provision of virtual care was performed. Data were synthesized using the Synthesis Without Meta-Analysis (SWiM) guideline, and the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation Instrument (AGREE II) tool was used to evaluate the quality of evidence. Results: A total of 60 guidelines for virtual care encounters were included; 52% of these were published in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. The majority (95%) of provider guidelines specified a type of virtual encounter to which their guidelines applied. Of included guidelines, 65% provided guidance regarding confidentiality/security, 58% discussed technology/setup, and 56% commented on patient consent. Thirty-one guidelines also provided guidance to patients or caregivers. Overall guideline quality was poor. Discussion: General best practices for successful telemedicine encounters include ensuring confidentiality and consent, preparation before a visit, and clear patient communication. Future studies should aim to objectively assess the efficacy of existing clinician practices and guidelines on patient attitudes and outcomes to further optimize the provision of virtual care for specific patient populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sama Anvari
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Samuel Neumark
- Translational Research Program, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rhea Jangra
- Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anthony Sandre
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Keerthana Pasumarthi
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ted Xenodemetropoulos
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Education and Innovation, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Riew GJ, Iyer S. Response to Letter to the Editor "Telemedicine in Spine Surgery During COVID-19". Global Spine J 2022; 12:1985. [PMID: 36271633 PMCID: PMC9596679 DOI: 10.1177/21925682211041616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
|
14
|
Xu JC, Haider SA, Sharma A, Blumenfeld K, Cheng J, Mazzola CA, Orrico KO, Rosenow J, Stacy J, Stroink A, Tomei K, Tumialán LM, Veeravagu A, Linskey ME, Schwalb J. Telehealth in Neurosurgery: 2021 Council of State Neurosurgical Societies National Survey Results. World Neurosurg 2022; 168:e328-e335. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.09.126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Revised: 09/27/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
15
|
Telemedicine Visits Can Generate Highly Accurate Diagnoses and Surgical Plans for Spine Patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2022; 47:1194-1202. [PMID: 35797655 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/24/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN A Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE To (1) assess whether diagnoses and surgical plans established during a new patient telemedicine visit changed following an in-person evaluation and (2) determine any differences in perioperative outcomes between patients who only had a telemedicine visit before surgery versus those who had a telemedicine visit followed by an in-person evaluation before surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Data on capability of telemedicine to deliver high-quality preoperative assessment without a traditional in-person interaction and physical examination is lacking. MATERIALS AND METHODS Records of patients who had a new patient telemedicine visit and indicated for surgery with documented specific diagnosis as well as surgical plans from a spine department at an urban tertiary center from April 2020 to April 2021 were reviewed. For a subset of patients that had a follow-up in-person evaluation before surgery, these diagnoses and plans were compared. Perioperative outcomes were compared between patients who only had a telemedicine visit before surgery versus those who had a telemedicine visit followed by an in-person evaluation before surgery. RESULTS A total of 166 patients were included. Of these, 101 patients (61%) only had a new patient telemedicine visit before surgery while 65 (39%) had a telemedicine visit followed by an in-person evaluation. There were no differences in the rate of case cancellations before surgery and patient-reported outcome measures between these two groups ( P >0.05). Of 65 patients who had both a telemedicine followed by an in-person visit, the diagnosis was unchanged for 61 patients (94%) and the surgical plan did not change for 52 patients (80%). The main reason for surgical plan change was due to updated findings on new imaging, 10 patients, (77%). CONCLUSIONS The current study suggests that telemedicine evaluations can provide an effective means of preoperative assessment for spine patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level 3.
Collapse
|
16
|
Riew GJ, Iyer S. Reply to GSJ Letter to Editor: Telemedicine in Spine Surgery: Global Perspectives and Practices. Global Spine J 2022; 12:1308-1309. [PMID: 35477315 PMCID: PMC9210247 DOI: 10.1177/21925682221091792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Grant J. Riew
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA,Sravisht Iyer, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ye IB, Thomson AE, Donahue J, Oster B, Miseo VS, Jauregui JJ, Cavanaugh D, Koh E, Gelb D, Ludwig S. Similar Accuracy of Surgical Plans after Initial In-Person and Telemedicine Evaluation of Spine Patients. World Neurosurg 2022; 164:e1043-e1048. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.05.091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Revised: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
18
|
Baughman D, Ptasinski A, Baughman K, Buckwalter N, Jabbarpour Y, Waheed A. Comparable Quality Performance of Acute Low-Back Pain Care in Telemedicine and Office-Based Cohorts. Telemed J E Health 2022; 28:1579-1586. [PMID: 35349350 DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2021.0535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Back pain is among the most common presentations in primary care offices. National organizations have standardized the appropriate use of imaging for acute low-back pain (LBP). The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of imaging in LBP between telemedicine and in-person clinical encounters. Methods: This retrospective cohort compared secondary data from 20,624 telemedicine and office encounters in a large nonprofit health system from July 1, 2019, to June 30, 2021. The proportion of patients aged 18-50 years who did not receive imaging for acute LBP (X-ray, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging) within 28 days of the provider encounter was measured according to Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set specifications. Performance was compared across race, ethnicity, age, body mass index, overall risk score, and insurance type. Chi-squared tests determined significant differences between cohorts (p < 0.05). Results: Patients seen via telemedicine had significantly lower rates of imaging within 28 days of their physician encounter (office: 16.32%, telemedicine: 11.20%; difference: 5.12%; p < 0.01). This was consistent across racial, ethnic, and risk score subgroups. Discussion: For practices and health systems, telemedicine might be a higher value approach for initial evaluation of acute LBP in primary care. For policy makers, telemedicine can save on health care costs without negatively impacting quality performance measures. Conclusions: Telemedicine is unlikely to compromise quality of acute LBP care, supporting this virtual space as an alternative care venue. The most beneficial use of telemedicine might be triaging initial encounters of acute LBP in primary care. Stronger evidence could support its long-term potential for driving value through cost savings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derek Baughman
- WellSpan Good Samaritan Hospital Family Medicine Residency Program, Lebanon, Pennsylvania, USA
- The Robert Graham Center for Policy Studies in Family and Primary Care, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Anna Ptasinski
- Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Nicholas Buckwalter
- WellSpan Good Samaritan Hospital Family Medicine Residency Program, Lebanon, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Yalda Jabbarpour
- The Robert Graham Center for Policy Studies in Family and Primary Care, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Abdul Waheed
- WellSpan Good Samaritan Hospital Family Medicine Residency Program, Lebanon, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Diaz-Miron J, Ogle S, Kaizer A, Acker SN, Rove KO, Inge TH. Surgeon, patient, and caregiver perspective of pediatric surgical telemedicine in the COVID-19 pandemic era. Pediatr Surg Int 2022; 38:241-248. [PMID: 34550442 PMCID: PMC8456071 DOI: 10.1007/s00383-021-05016-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Adoption of telemedicine (TME) in surgical specialties, prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, has previously been slow. The purpose of this prospective, observational, single institution study is to evaluate surgeon and caregiver perspectives of TMEs during the pandemic. METHODS Surveys were distributed to surgical faculty regarding perceptions of TME early during the pandemic and 2 months later. Caregivers (or patients > 18 years old) were asked after each TME to complete a survey regarding perceptions of TMEs. RESULTS Surveys were distributed to 73 surgeons. Response rates were 71% initially and 63% at follow-up. Sixty-eight percent reported no prior TME experience. No significant differences were noted in the overall satisfaction. An inverse relationship between surgeon age and satisfaction at the follow-up survey was identified (p = 0.007). Additional surveys were distributed to 616 caregivers or patients (response rate 13%). Seventy-two percent reported no prior experience with TME and 79% described TME as similar to an in-person visit. Audiovisual satisfaction of the TME was higher in greater income households (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS Pre-pandemic experience with TME was low in both groups; however, experiences were perceived as satisfactory. Positive experiences with TME may encourage increased utilization in the future, although demographic variations may impact satisfaction with TME. TRIAL REGISTRATION Unique identifier NCT04376710 at Clinicaltrials.gov (5/6/2020).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose Diaz-Miron
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado, 13123 E 16th Ave, B323, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
| | - Sarah Ogle
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado, 13123 E 16th Ave, B323, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Alex Kaizer
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado-Anschutz Medical Campus, 13001 East 17th Place, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Shannon N Acker
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado, 13123 E 16th Ave, B323, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Kyle O Rove
- Department of Pediatric Urology, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 13123 E. 16th Ave, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Thomas H Inge
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado, 13123 E 16th Ave, B323, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Elderly Patients with Spinal Disorders. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11030602. [PMID: 35160053 PMCID: PMC8836518 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11030602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2021] [Revised: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
During the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, home-quarantine has been necessary, resulting in lifestyle changes that might negatively affect patients with spinal disorders, including a reduction in their quality of life (QoL) and activities of daily living (ADLs). However, studies on this impact are lacking. This study aimed to investigate the age-related changes in QoL and ADLs in patients with spinal disorders, and also identify factors associated with decline in ADLs. This multicenter cross-sectional study included patients who visited four private spine clinics for any symptoms. The study participants either had a clinic reservation, were first-time clinic visitors, or had a return visit to the clinic. The participants completed several questionnaires at two points: pre-pandemic and post-second wave. Changes in patient symptoms, exercise habits, ADLs, and health-related QoL were assessed. A logistic regression model was used to calculate the odds ratio (OR) of each variable for decline in ADLs. We included 606 patients; among them, 281 and 325 patients were aged <65 and ≥65 years, respectively. Regarding exercise habits, 46% and 48% of the patients in the <65 and ≥65-year age groups, respectively, did not change their exercise habits. In contrast, 40% and 32% of the patients in the <65 and ≥65-year age groups, respectively, decreased their exercise habits. In the multivariate analysis, the adjusted ORs for sex (female), decreased exercise habit, and age >65 years were 1.7 (1.1–2.9), 2.4 (1.4–3.9), and 2.7 (1.6–4.4), respectively. In conclusion, there was a decline in the ADLs and QoL after the COVID-19 outbreak in patients with spinal disorders. Aging, reduction of exercise habits, and female sex were independent factors related to decline in ADLs.
Collapse
|
21
|
XR (Extended Reality: Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, Mixed Reality) Technology in Spine Medicine: Status Quo and Quo Vadis. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11020470. [PMID: 35054164 PMCID: PMC8779726 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11020470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Revised: 01/01/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
In recent years, with the rapid advancement and consumerization of virtual reality, augmented reality, mixed reality, and extended reality (XR) technology, the use of XR technology in spine medicine has also become increasingly popular. The rising use of XR technology in spine medicine has also been accelerated by the recent wave of digital transformation (i.e., case-specific three-dimensional medical images and holograms, wearable sensors, video cameras, fifth generation, artificial intelligence, and head-mounted displays), and further accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic and the increase in minimally invasive spine surgery. The COVID-19 pandemic has a negative impact on society, but positive impacts can also be expected, including the continued spread and adoption of telemedicine services (i.e., tele-education, tele-surgery, tele-rehabilitation) that promote digital transformation. The purpose of this narrative review is to describe the accelerators of XR (VR, AR, MR) technology in spine medicine and then to provide a comprehensive review of the use of XR technology in spine medicine, including surgery, consultation, education, and rehabilitation, as well as to identify its limitations and future perspectives (status quo and quo vadis).
Collapse
|
22
|
Crawford AM, Lightsey HM, Xiong GX, Striano BM, Schoenfeld AJ, Simpson AK. Telemedicine visits generate accurate surgical plans across orthopaedic subspecialties. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2022; 142:3009-3016. [PMID: 33866406 PMCID: PMC8053078 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-03903-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The role of telemedicine is rapidly evolving across medical specialties and orthopaedics. The utility of telemedicine to identify operative candidates and determine surgical plans has yet to be demonstrated. We sought to assess whether surgical plans proposed following telemedicine visits changed after subsequent in-person interaction across orthopaedic subspecialties. MATERIALS AND METHODS We identified all elective telemedicine encounters across two academic institutions from March 1, 2020 to July 31, 2020. We identified patients indicated for surgery with a specific surgical plan during the virtual visit. The surgical plans delineated during the telemedicine encounter were then compared to final pre-operative plans documented following subsequent in-person evaluation. Changes in the surgical plan between telemedicine and in-person encounters were defined using a standardised schema. Regression analysis was used to evaluate factors associated with a change in surgical plan between visits across specialties, including the number of virtual examination manoeuvres performed. RESULTS We identified 303 instances of a patient being indicated for orthopaedic surgery during a telemedicine encounter. In 11 cases (4%), the plan was changed between telemedicine and subsequent in-person encounter. No plans were changed amongst patients indicated for joint arthroplasty and foot and ankle surgery, whilst 4% of plans were changed amongst sports surgery and upper extremity/shoulder surgery. Surgical plans had the highest rate of change amongst spine surgery patients (8%). There was notable variability in the conduct of virtual examinations across subspecialties. CONCLUSION Our results demonstrate the capability of telemedicine to support development of accurate surgical plans for orthopaedic patients across several subspecialties. Our findings also highlight the substantial variation in the utilisation of physical examination manoeuvres conducted via telemedicine across institutions, subspecialties, and providers. DESCRIPTION OF STUDY TYPE Level IV, retrospective cohort study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Harry M. Lightsey
- Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114 USA
| | - Grace X. Xiong
- Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114 USA
| | - Brendan M. Striano
- Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114 USA
| | - Andrew J. Schoenfeld
- Department of Orthopaedic Spine Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical Schools, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
| | - Andrew K. Simpson
- Department of Orthopaedic Spine Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical Schools, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Boisvert-Plante V, Noutsios CD, Perez J, Ingelmo P. The Telemedicine-Based Pediatric Examination of the Neck and Upper Limbs: A Narrative Review. J Pain Res 2021; 14:3173-3192. [PMID: 34675645 PMCID: PMC8519790 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s336168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
With the COVID-19 pandemic hastening the adoption of telemedicine into clinical practice, it has also prompted an abundance of new literature highlighting its capabilities and limitations. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current state of the literature on telemedicine applied in the context of a musculoskeletal examination of the neck and upper limbs for children 3 to 18 years old. The PubMed and ScienceDirect databases were searched for relevant articles from January 2015 to August 2021 using a combination of keywords and nested searches. General examination components including inspection, guided self-palpation, range of motion, sensory and motor examination, as well as special testing are described. Although the literature is focused mainly on adult populations, we describe how each component of the exam can be reliably incorporated into a virtual appointment specific to pediatric patients. Caregivers are generally needed for most consultations, but certain maneuvers can be self-performed by older children and adolescents alone. There is general feasibility, validity, and substantial reliability in performing most examination components of the upper limbs remotely, except for the shoulder exam. Compared to those made in person, clinical diagnoses established virtually were found to be either the same or similar in most cases, and management decisions also had high agreement. Despite this, there is evidence that some pediatric providers may not be able to collect all the information needed from a telemedicine visit to make a complete clinical assessment. Lastly, currently available smartphone applications measuring joint range of motion were found to have high reliability and validity. This narrative review not only establishes a foundation for a structured pediatric musculoskeletal examination, but also aims to increase physicians' confidence in incorporating telemedicine into their standard of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jordi Perez
- Alan Edwards Pain Management Unit, Montreal General Hospital (McGill University Health Centre), Montreal, QC, Canada
- Alan Edwards Centre for Pain Research, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Pablo Ingelmo
- Alan Edwards Centre for Pain Research, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Edwards Family Interdisciplinary Complex Pain Centre, Montreal Children’s Hospital (McGill University Health Centre), Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Noutsios CD, Boisvert-Plante V, Laberge E, Perez J, Ingelmo P. The Telemedicine-Based Pediatric Examination of the Back and Lower Limbs: A Narrative Review. J Pain Res 2021; 14:2959-2979. [PMID: 34584449 PMCID: PMC8464344 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s329173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 09/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the transition to virtual healthcare while also prompting an abundance of new literature highlighting telemedicine's capabilities and limitations for various medical applications, notably musculoskeletal examinations. Telemedicine provides an opportunity to deliver timely patient- and family-centred care while maintaining physical distancing and improving access to remote communities. This review aims to narrate the current state of the literature on telemedicine applied in the context of a musculoskeletal examination for children aged 3 to 18 years. The PubMed and ScienceDirect databases were searched for relevant articles from January 2015 to August 2021 using a combination of keywords and nested searches. The general examination components relevant to the back and lumbosacral spine, hip, knee, ankle/foot, and gait are described. These components include inspection, palpation, range of motion, motor, and sensory examination as well as special testing. There is general feasibility, validity, and substantial reliability in performing most examination components, and primary diagnoses established virtually were found to be either the same or similar in the vast majority of cases. Despite the current literature focusing mainly on adult populations, we describe how each aspect of the exam can be reliably incorporated into a virtual appointment specific to the pediatric population. Currently available smartphone-based applications that measure joint range of motion were generally found to have high reliability and validity. Caregivers are needed for most of the consultation, especially in younger children, but select physical exam maneuvers can be self-performed by older children and adolescents alone. By providing an overview of the available smartphone tools as well as the reliability and validity of remote assessments, this review not only establishes a foundation for a structured pediatric musculoskeletal examination, but also aims to increase providers' confidence in incorporating telemedicine into their practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Erika Laberge
- Edward’s Family Interdisciplinary Centre for Pediatric Complex Pain, Montreal Children’s Hospital (McGill University Health Centre), Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Jordi Perez
- Alan Edwards Pain Management Unit, Montreal General Hospital (McGill University Health Centre), Montreal, QC, Canada
- Alan Edwards Centre for Pain Research, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Pablo Ingelmo
- Edward’s Family Interdisciplinary Centre for Pediatric Complex Pain, Montreal Children’s Hospital (McGill University Health Centre), Montreal, QC, Canada
- Alan Edwards Centre for Pain Research, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Research Institute, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Grundstein MJ, Fisher C, Titmuss M, Cioppa-Mosca J. The Role of Virtual Physical Therapy in a Post-Pandemic World: Pearls, Pitfalls, Challenges, and Adaptations. Phys Ther 2021; 101:6294522. [PMID: 34106273 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzab145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2020] [Revised: 02/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To keep patients healthy and safe during the pandemic, payers and the federal government temporarily relaxed restrictions, expanded the eligible provider list for providing telehealth services, and developed a reimbursement structure. Physical therapists were uniquely challenged during the pandemic, requiring a reassessment of techniques and strategies in order to best support patients. The purpose of this case report is to describe a musculoskeletal institution's experience with implementing telehealth physical therapy. METHODS Previous telehealth experience enabled the infrastructure of a wide-scale adoption across institutions to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, to fill in training gaps for Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) outpatient physical therapists, HSS Rehabilitation developed a robust education and implementation program. This training was influenced by clinician and patient surveys as well as the development of a published HSS Rehabilitation telehealth guide. Prior to performing telehealth physical therapist visits, clinicians were required to complete all training material to ensure comfortability and confidence. RESULTS The adoption of telehealth among clinicians was born out of necessaity; however, the speed with which HSS Rehabilitation pivoted was critical to avoid lapses in care. In a 4-week period after the New York City shelter in-place orders, 173 therapists were trained and performing virtual visits. HSS Rehabilitation determined telehealth physical therapy had quicker access to care, similar patient satisifaction, and increased geographical outreach compared with in-person care. CONCLUSION The transition to telehealth physical therapy included a multi-step process that provided clinician training, established protocols and guidelines, and obtained a better understanding of the patient experience. Telehealth physical therapy has shown early benefits such as improving patient access to care and better continuity of care for traveling patients. Even after the current public health emergency, there is a place for high-value telehealth physical therapy in caring for patients with musculoskeletal conditions.
Collapse
|
26
|
Crawford AM, Lightsey HM, Xiong GX, Striano BM, Greene N, Schoenfeld AJ, Simpson AK. Interventional procedure plans generated by telemedicine visits in spine patients are rarely changed after in-person evaluation. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2021; 46:478-481. [PMID: 33757998 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2021-102630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Revised: 03/06/2021] [Accepted: 03/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The role of telemedicine in the evaluation and treatment of patients with spinal disorders is rapidly expanding, brought on largely by the COVID-19 pandemic. Within this context, the ability of pain specialists to accurately diagnose and plan appropriate interventional spine procedures based entirely on telemedicine visits, without an in-person evaluation, remains to be established. In this study, our primary objective was to assess the relevance of telemedicine to interventional spine procedure planning by determining whether procedure plans established solely from virtual visits changed following in-person evaluation. METHODS We reviewed virtual and in-person clinical encounters from our academic health system's 10 interventional spine specialists. We included patients who were seen exclusively via telemedicine encounters and indicated for an interventional procedure with documented procedural plans. Virtual plans were then compared with the actual procedures performed following in-person evaluation. Demographic data as well as the type and extent of physical examination performed by the interventional spine specialist were also recorded. RESULTS Of the 87 new patients included, the mean age was 60 years (SE 1.4 years) and the preprocedural plan established by telemedicine, primarily videoconferencing, did not change for 76 individuals (87%; 95% CI 0.79 to 0.94) following in-person evaluation. Based on the size of our sample, interventional procedures indicated solely during telemedicine encounters may be accurate in 79%-94% of cases in the broader population. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that telemedicine evaluations are a generally accurate means of preprocedural assessment and development of interventional spine procedure plans. These findings clearly demonstrate the capabilities of telemedicine for evaluating spine patients and planning interventional spine procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Harry M Lightsey
- Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Grace X Xiong
- Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Brendan M Striano
- Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nattaly Greene
- Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Andrew K Simpson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Lightsey HM, Crawford AM, Xiong GX, Schoenfeld AJ, Simpson AK. Surgical plans generated from telemedicine visits are rarely changed after in-person evaluation in spine patients. Spine J 2021; 21:359-365. [PMID: 33227550 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2020] [Revised: 11/06/2020] [Accepted: 11/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT The role of telemedicine within the realm of spine surgery is evolving, catalyzed by the recent pandemic. Specifically, the capability of this technology to provide high-quality, cost-effective care without an in-person interaction and physical examination remains poorly defined. PURPOSE To characterize the impact of telemedicine on spine surgical planning by assessing whether surgical plans established in virtual visits changed following in-person evaluation. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE We evaluated the records of patients who were indicated for surgery with documented specific surgical plans during a virtual encounter (March-July 2020) and underwent subsequent in-person evaluation prior to surgery. OUTCOME MEASURES We determined whether surgical plans changed between the virtual encounter and the in-person interaction. Secondarily, we reviewed use of the virtual physical examination across surgeons. METHODS We reviewed virtual and in-person clinical encounters from a single academic spine division, evaluating those patients who were seen exclusively via telemedicine encounters and indicated for surgery with documented specific surgical plans. These plans were compared to the surgical plan after these same patients underwent in-person evaluation. Demographic data, patient primary complaint, and the type and extent of physical examination performed by the surgeon were recorded. RESULTS Of the 33 patients included, the surgical plan did not change among 31 individuals (94%) following in-person interaction. For the two patients where surgical plans were modified, multilevel fusions were increased by one level. There was notable inter- and intra-surgeon variability with regard to the use of virtual physical exams. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that telemedicine evaluations are efficient means of preoperative assessment of spine patients and delineation of surgical plans. These results may support innovations that can optimize access to care for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harry M Lightsey
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115 USA
| | - Alexander M Crawford
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115 USA
| | - Grace X Xiong
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115 USA
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115 USA
| | - Andrew K Simpson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115 USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Iyer S, Shafi K, Lovecchio F, Turner R, Albert TJ, Kim HJ, Press J, Katsuura Y, Sandhu H, Schwab F, Qureshi S. The Spine Telehealth Physical Examination: Strategies for Success. HSS J 2021; 17:14-17. [PMID: 33967636 PMCID: PMC8077977 DOI: 10.1177/1556331620974954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2020] [Accepted: 10/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Karim Shafi
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | - Han Jo Kim
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joel Press
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Shafi KA, Mackie AT, Farrell A, Degale B, Fabricant PD. Telehealth in the Pediatric and Adolescent Population: Unique Considerations. HSS J 2021; 17:91-93. [PMID: 33967649 PMCID: PMC8077982 DOI: 10.1177/1556331620976137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2020] [Accepted: 10/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Karim A. Shafi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alexandra T. Mackie
- Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgery Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alexandra Farrell
- Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgery Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Babita Degale
- Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgery Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter D. Fabricant
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
- Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgery Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
LeBrun DG, Malfer C, Wilson M, Carroll KM, Wang, MS V, Mayman DJ, Cross MB, Alexiades MM, Jerabek SA, Cushner FD, Vigdorchik JM, Haas SB, Ast MP. Telemedicine in an Outpatient Arthroplasty Setting During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Early Lessons from New York City. HSS J 2021; 17:25-30. [PMID: 33967638 PMCID: PMC8077980 DOI: 10.1177/1556331620972659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2020] [Accepted: 10/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Background: The early months of the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic in New York City led to a rapid transition of non-essential in-person health care, including outpatient arthroplasty visits, to a telemedicine context. Questions/Purposes: Based on our initial experiences with telemedicine in an outpatient arthroplasty setting, we sought to determine early lessons learned that may be applicable to other providers adopting or expanding telemedicine services. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed by surveying all patients undergoing telemedicine visits with 8 arthroplasty surgeons at 1 orthopedic specialty hospital in New York City from April 8 to May 19, 2020. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze demographic data, satisfaction with the telemedicine visit, and positive and negative takeaways. Results: In all, 164 patients completed the survey. The most common reasons for the telemedicine visit were short-term (less than 6 months), postoperative appointment (n = 88; 54%), and new patient consultation (n = 32; 20%). A total of 84 patients (51%) noted a reduction in expenses versus standard outpatient care. Several positive themes emerged from patient feedback, including less anxiety and stress related to traveling (n = 82; 50%), feeling more at ease in a familiar environment (n = 54; 33%), and the ability to assess postoperative home environment (n = 13; 8%). However, patients also expressed concerns about the difficulty addressing symptoms in the absence of an in-person examination (n = 28; 17%), a decreased sense of interpersonal connection with the physician (n = 20; 12%), and technical difficulties (n = 14; 9%). Conclusions: Patients were satisfied with their telemedicine experience during the COVID-19 pandemic; however, we identified several areas amenable to improvement. Further study is warranted.
Collapse
|
31
|
Telemedicine in research and training: spine surgeon perspectives and practices worldwide. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2021; 30:2143-2149. [PMID: 33481089 PMCID: PMC7820826 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-020-06716-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Revised: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 12/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To utilize a global survey to elucidate spine surgeons’ perspectives towards research and resident education within telemedicine.
Methods A cross-sectional, anonymous email survey was circulated to the members of AO Spine, an international organization consisting of spine surgeons from around the world. Questions were selected and revised using a Delphi approach. A major portion of the final survey queried participants on experiences with telemedicine in training, the utility of telemedicine for research, and the efficacy of telemedicine as a teaching tool. Responses were compared by region. Results A total of 485 surgeons completed the survey between May 15, 2020 and May 31, 2020. Though most work regularly with trainees (83.3%) and 81.8% agreed that telemedicine should be incorporated into clinical education, 61.7% of respondents stated that trainees are not present during telemedicine visits. With regards to the types of clinical education that telemedicine could provide, only 33.9% of respondents agreed that interpretation of physical exam maneuvers can be taught (mean score = − 0.28, SD = ± 1.13). The most frequent research tasks performed over telehealth were follow-up of imaging (28.7%) and study group meetings (26.6%). Of all survey responses provided by members, there were no regional differences (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). Conclusions Our study of spine surgeons worldwide noted high agreement among specialists for the implantation of telemedicine in trainee curricula, underscoring the global acceptance of this medium for patient management going forward. A greater emphasis towards trainee participation as well as establishing best practices in telemedicine are essential to equip future spine specialists with the necessary skills for navigating this emerging platform. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at (10.1007/s00586-020-06716-w).
Collapse
|
32
|
Swiatek PR, Weiner JA, Johnson DJ, Louie PK, McCarthy MH, Harada GK, Germscheid N, Cheung JPY, Neva MH, El-Sharkawi M, Valacco M, Sciubba DM, Chutkan NB, An HS, Samartzis D. COVID-19 and the rise of virtual medicine in spine surgery: a worldwide study. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2021; 30:2133-2142. [PMID: 33452925 PMCID: PMC7811348 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-020-06714-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2020] [Revised: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 12/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The COVID-19 pandemic forced many surgeons to adopt "virtual medicine" practices, defined as telehealth services for patient care and online platforms for continuing medical education. The purpose of this study was to assess spine surgeon reliance on virtual medicine during the pandemic and to discuss the future of virtual medicine in spine surgery. METHODS A comprehensive survey addressing demographic data and virtual medicine practices was distributed to spine surgeons worldwide between March 27, 2020, and April 4, 2020. RESULTS 902 spine surgeons representing seven global regions responded. 35.6% of surgeons were identified as "high telehealth users," conducting more than half of clinic visits virtually. Predictors of high telehealth utilization included working in an academic practice (OR = 1.68, p = 0.0015) and practicing in Europe/North America (OR 3.42, p < 0.0001). 80.1% of all surgeons were interested in online education. Dedicating more than 25% of one's practice to teaching (OR = 1.89, p = 0.037) predicted increased interest in online education. 26.2% of respondents were identified as "virtual medicine surgeons," defined as surgeons with both high telehealth usage and increased interest in online education. Living in Europe/North America and practicing in an academic practice increased odds of being a virtual medicine surgeon by 2.28 (p = 0.002) and 1.15 (p = 0.0082), respectively. 93.8% of surgeons reported interest in a centralized platform facilitating surgeon-to-surgeon communication. CONCLUSION COVID-19 has changed spine surgery by triggering rapid adoption of virtual medicine practices. The demonstrated global interest in virtual medicine suggests that it may become part of the "new normal" for surgeons in the post-pandemic era.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter R Swiatek
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Joseph A Weiner
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Daniel J Johnson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Philip K Louie
- Neuroscience Institute, Virginia Mason, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Michael H McCarthy
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Garrett K Harada
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Orthopaedic Building, Suite 204-G, 1611 W Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.,The International Spine Research and Innovation Initiative, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Jason P Y Cheung
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Marko H Neva
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Mohammad El-Sharkawi
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Assiut University Medical School, Assiut, Egypt
| | - Marcelo Valacco
- Department of Orthopaedics, Churruca Hospital de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Daniel M Sciubba
- Department of Neurosurgery, John Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Norman B Chutkan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Howard S An
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Orthopaedic Building, Suite 204-G, 1611 W Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.,The International Spine Research and Innovation Initiative, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Dino Samartzis
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Orthopaedic Building, Suite 204-G, 1611 W Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA. .,The International Spine Research and Innovation Initiative, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Spine surgeon perceptions of the challenges and benefits of telemedicine: an international study. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2021; 30:2124-2132. [PMID: 33452924 PMCID: PMC7811153 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-020-06707-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Revised: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Introduction While telemedicine usage has increased due to the COVID-19 pandemic, there remains little consensus about how spine surgeons perceive virtual care. The purpose of this study was to explore international perspectives of spine providers on the challenges and benefits of telemedicine. Methods Responses from 485 members of AO Spine were analyzed, covering provider perceptions of the challenges and benefits of telemedicine. All questions were optional, and blank responses were excluded from analysis. Results The leading challenges reported by surgeons were decreased ability to perform physical examinations (38.6%), possible increased medicolegal exposure (19.3%), and lack of reimbursement parity compared to traditional visits (15.5%). Fewer than 9.0% of respondents experienced technological issues. On average, respondents agreed that telemedicine increases access to care for rural/long-distance patients, provides societal cost savings, and increases patient convenience. Responses were mixed about whether telemedicine leads to greater patient satisfaction. North Americans experienced the most challenges, but also thought telemedicine carried the most benefits, whereas Africans reported the fewest challenges and benefits. Age did not affect responses. Conclusion Spine surgeons are supportive of the benefits of telemedicine, and only a small minority experienced technical issues. The decreased ability to perform the physical examination was the top challenge and remains a major obstacle to virtual care for spine surgeons around the world, although interestingly, 61.4% of providers did not acknowledge this to be a major challenge. Significant groundwork in optimizing remote physical examination maneuvers and achieving legal and reimbursement clarity is necessary for widespread implementation.
Collapse
|
34
|
The Efficacy of Telehealth for the Treatment of Spinal Disorders: Patient-Reported Experiences During the COVID-19 Pandemic. HSS J 2020; 16:17-23. [PMID: 33169072 PMCID: PMC7640578 DOI: 10.1007/s11420-020-09808-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of telehealth saw a rapid surge during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic. There remains little data on how effectively telehealth replicates traditional office visits in the treatment of spinal disorders and how telehealth is perceived by patients with spinal disorders. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES We sought to evaluate patient satisfaction with telehealth visits as a platform for delivering care for the treatment of spinal pathology. METHODS Patients undergoing a telehealth visit with providers specializing in the treatment of spinal disorders (one surgeon and two physiatrists) were provided with an anonymous, online survey. Data on patient satisfaction, effectiveness of the telehealth visit (in comparison with in-person visits), and clarity of communication were collected through 5-point Likert scales; visit characteristics and free-text responses were also collected. RESULTS Eighty-four patients responded to the survey. Their attitudes were largely positive, with an overall mean patient satisfaction score of 4.79. Patients gave high scores for clarity of communication during the visit, and for satisfaction with the formulation of treatment plans and their ability to ask questions, they gave the lowest scores to the effectiveness of telemedicine in replacing an in-person visit and ease of interface navigation. CONCLUSIONS The high overall patient satisfaction reported by our patients seeking care for a spinal pathology supports the growing body of evidence promoting the use of telehealth for orthopedic care. Further research is needed in a standardized telehealth examination of patients with spinal disorders.
Collapse
|