Sagittal alignment based on inflection point and its differences according to age groups

The Importance of Incorporating Proportional Alignment in Adult Cervical Deformity Corrections Relative to Regional and Global Alignment: Steps Toward Development of a Cervical-Specific Score

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective single-center study.

BACKGROUND

The global alignment and proportion score is widely used in adult spinal deformity surgery. However, it is not specific to the parameters used in adult cervical deformity (ACD).

PURPOSE

Create a cervicothoracic alignment and proportion (CAP) score in patients with operative ACD.

METHODS

Patients with ACD with 2-year data were included. Parameters consisted of relative McGregor's Slope [RMGS = (MGS × 1.5)/0.9], relative cervical lordosis [RCL = CL - thoracic kyphosis (TK)], Cervical Lordosis Distribution Index (CLDI = C2 - Apex × 100/C2 - T2), relative pelvic version (RPV = sacral slope - pelvic incidence × 0.59 + 9), and a frailty factor (greater than 0.33). Cutoff points were chosen where the cross-tabulation of parameter subgroups reached a maximal rate of meeting the Optimal Outcome. The optimal outcome was defined as meeting Good Clinical Outcome criteria without the occurrence of distal junctional failure (DJF) or reoperation. CAP was scored between 0 and 13 and categorized accordingly: ≤3 (proportioned), 4-6 (moderately disproportioned), >6 (severely disproportioned). Multivariable logistic regression analysis determined the relationship between CAP categories, overall score, and development of distal junctional kyphosis (DJK), DJF, reoperation, and Optimal Outcome by 2 years.

RESULTS

One hundred five patients with operative ACD were included. Assessment of the 3-month CAP score found a mean of 5.2/13 possible points. 22.7% of patients were proportioned, 49.5% moderately disproportioned, and 27.8% severely disproportioned. DJK occurred in 34.5% and DJF in 8.7%, 20.0% underwent reoperation, and 55.7% achieved Optimal Outcome. Patients severely disproportioned in CAP had higher odds of DJK [OR: 6.0 (2.1-17.7); P =0.001], DJF [OR: 9.7 (1.8-51.8); P =0.008], reoperation [OR: 3.3 (1.9-10.6); P =0.011], and lower odds of meeting the optimal outcome [OR: 0.3 (0.1-0.7); P =0.007] by 2 years, while proportioned patients suffered zero occurrences of DJK or DJF.

CONCLUSION

The regional alignment and proportion score is a method of analyzing the cervical spine relative to global alignment and demonstrates the importance of maintaining horizontal gaze, while also matching overall cervical and thoracolumbar alignment to limit complications and maximize clinical improvement.

Variation of cervical sagittal alignment parameters according to age and pelvic incidence in degenerative spinal deformity patients

INTRODUCTION

In asymptomatic subjects, variations of cervical sagittal alignment parameters according to age and spinopelvic organization have been reported. A large range of compensation phenomena has been observed in degenerative spinal deformity in order to maintain horizontal gaze, but it remains unclear how age and spinopelvic morphology could additionally influence cervical alignment. The aim of this observational retrospective study was to describe the distribution of cervical sagittal alignment parameters according to age and pelvic incidence in subjects with and without degenerative spinal deformity in order to precisely evaluate cervical compensation phenomena in adult spinal deformity (ASD).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Radiographs of 478 subjects (327 females and 151 males) were distributed into 235 asymptomatic and 243 deformed subjects. Occipito-cervical parameters were McGregor-C1, McGregor-C2, C1-C2 and occipito-C2 angles. The cervicothoracic inflection point (CTIP) was determined. Caudal cervical sagittal alignment parameters were: C2-C7 lordosis, C2-apex (superior arch), apex-CTIP (inferior arch), occipito-C3 and occipito-C4 angles, C7-slope and T1-slope. The distribution of parameters was analyzed using a Bayesian inference (significant when Pr > 0.975 or Pr < 0.025). Comparisons between asymptomatic and deformed subjects were done after matching on age (40-60 years; > 60 years) and on PI (< 45°; 45-60°; > 60°).

RESULTS

Among occipito-cervical parameters, there was no significant change in McGregor-C1 angle. However, McGregor-C2 angle was significantly higher in the ASD group (Pr = 0.0029), with influence of age (Pr = 0.023), but PI influence. C1-C2 lordosis was significantly higher in the ASD group compared to the asymptomatic group (Pr < 0.0007), without influence of age or PI noticed. C2-C7 lordosis was also higher in the ASD group (Pr < 0.025) with a role of age and PI (Pr < 0.025). Cervical lordosis in the superior arch was significantly higher in the ASD group (Pr > 0.999), without influence of age or PI. In the inferior arch, the lordosis angle was not modified according to the group, but there was an influence of age (Pr < 0.0007). C7-slope and T1-slope were higher according the age group (Pr < 0.0012), without influence of the group or PI.

CONCLUSION

This observational study highlights cervical sagittal alignment adaptations in degenerative spinal deformity, matched on age and pelvic incidence. The inferior cervical spine seemed to be modified with a higher lordosis, increasing with age responding to the age-related thoracic kyphosis increase. In addition to that, the superior cervical spine hyperextends more in adult degenerative deformity to maintain horizontal gaze.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

The Thoracolumbar Inflection Point in a Population of Asymptomatic Volunteers: A Multi-Ethnic Alignment Normative Study Cohort Study

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

To show population variance in the Inflection Point (IP) and its role in defining maximum Thoracic Kyphosis (TK) and Lumbar Lordosis (LL).

METHODS

468 asymptomatic adult volunteers were included in the Multi-Ethnic Normative Alignment Study (MEANS). To find parameters correlating with IP, the vertebrae and discs were numbered such that C7 was 0, T1 was 1, with T1-T2 disc being 1.5, etc. Statistical analysis was performed by a correlation matrix for IP and the 9 other selected parameters along with linear regressions.

RESULTS

The overall mean IP was 12.44 approximately corresponding to T12-L1 disc with the median being 12.50, range was T8-L4. The cohort was then stratified by sex and ethnicity, but there was no significant difference in IP between groups. IP in younger subjects was 13 (L1), compared to 12.5 (T12-L1 disc) in older subjects (P < .05). IP was moderately correlated with the TK apex (r = .66). No strong correlation was found between IP and LL magnitude or apex, TK magnitude, sacral slope, or Pelvic Incidence (PI). In terms of other sagittal parameters, PI and LL demonstrated a significant positive correlation. PI and TK did not have a strong association.

CONCLUSIONS

The mean IP was at the T12-L1 disc, however IP ranged from T8 to L4. Older subjects tended to have a relatively more cephalad IP. No radiographic variable was found to be a strong predictor of the IP. TK apex was found to have a moderate correlation.

The Effect of Cervical Fusion on Functional Sagittal Spinal Alignment Based on the Inflection Point: Case Series Study

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective radiologic study.

OBJECTIVE

The inflection point is the disc space between a lordotic and kyphotic segment of spine. To our knowledge, there has been no study evaluating changes in functional sagittal alignment determined by inflection points after cervical fusion surgery. The purpose is to identify changes in functional sagittal alignment after cervical fusion as determined by functional segments between cervicothoracic and thoracolumbar inflection points.

METHODS

Standing radiographs of the sagittal whole spine were taken in 62 patients who underwent cervical fusion procedures. We identified cervicothoracic and thoracolumbar inflection points in the sagittal plane and measured Cobb angles of resulting "functional" cervical, thoracic, and lumbar segments. We also measured the C2 and T1 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) distance to S1 and the anatomic cervical lordosis, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, spinopelvic parameters, and T1 sagittal slope. We compared the pre- and post-op values.

RESULTS

The functional cervical segment and T1 sagittal slope increased postoperatively. C2 and T1 SVA distance to S1 decreased postoperatively. In patients with a single level fusion or lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) proximal or equal to C6, functional cervical segment, and anatomic cervical lordosis increased postoperatively. In those with multiple level fusion or LIV distal or equal to C7, the C2 SVA distance to S1 decreased postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

After cervical fusion surgery, functional cervical sagittal parameters determined by the inflection point improve without changes in the anatomic sagittal parameters. Postoperative changes in functional sagittal parameters were affected by the number of fused levels and LIV.

Automatic recognition of whole-spine sagittal alignment and curvature analysis through a deep learning technique

PURPOSE

Artificial intelligence based on deep learning (DL) approaches enables the automatic recognition of anatomic landmarks and subsequent estimation of various spinopelvic parameters. The locations of inflection points (IPs) and apices (APs) in whole-spine lateral radiographs could be mathematically determined by a fully automatic spinal sagittal curvature analysis system.

METHODS

We developed a DL model for automatic spinal curvature analysis of whole-spine lateral plain radiographs by using 1800 annotated images of various spinal disease etiologies. The DL model comprised a landmark localizer to detect 25 vertebral landmarks and a numerical algorithm for the generation of an individualized spinal sagittal curvature. The characteristics of the spinal curvature, including the IPs, APs, and curvature angle, could thus be analyzed using mathematical definitions. The localization error of each landmark was calculated from the predictions of 300 test images to evaluate the performance of the landmark localizer. The interrater reliability among a senior orthopedic surgeon, a radiologist, and the DL model was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

The accuracy of the landmark localizer was within an acceptable range (median error: 1.7-4.1 mm), and the interrater reliabilities between the proposed DL model and each expert were good to excellent (all ICCs > 0.85) for the measurement of spinal curvature characteristics.

CONCLUSION

The interrater reliability between the proposed DL model and human experts was good to excellent in predicting the locations of IPs, APs, and curvature angles. Future applications should be explored to validate this system and improve its clinical efficiency.