1
|
Thomas VJ, Buchweitz NF, Baek JJ, Wu Y, Mercuri JJ. The development of a nucleus pulposus-derived cartilage analog scaffold for chondral repair and regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res A 2024; 112:421-435. [PMID: 37964720 PMCID: PMC10842041 DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.37639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Revised: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023]
Abstract
Focal chondral defects (FCDs) significantly impede quality of life for patients and impose severe economic costs on society. One of the most promising treatment options-autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC)-could benefit from a scaffold that contains both of the primary cartilage matrix components-sulfated glycosaminoglycans (sGAGs) and collagen type II. Here, 17 different protocols were evaluated to determine the most optimum strategy for decellularizing (decelling) the bovine nucleus pulposus (bNP) to yield a natural biomaterial with a cartilaginous constituency. The resulting scaffold was then characterized with respect to its biochemistry, biomechanics and cytocompatibility. Results indicated that the optimal decell protocol involved pre-crosslinking the tissue prior to undergoing decell with trypsin and Triton X-100. The residual DNA content of the scaffold was found to be 32.64 ± 9.26 ng/mg dry wt. of tissue with sGAG and hydroxyproline (HYP) contents of 72.53 ± 16.43. and 78.38 ± 8.46 μg/mg dry wt. respectively. The dynamic viscoelastic properties were found to be preserved (complex modulus: 17.92-16.62 kPa across a range of frequencies) while the equilibrium properties were found to have significantly decreased (aggregate modulus: 11.51 ± 9.19 kPa) compared to the non-decelled fresh bNP tissue. Furthermore, the construct was also found to be cytocompatible with bone marrow stem cells (BMSCs). While it was not permissive of cellular infiltration, the BMSCs were still found to have lined the laser drilled channels in the scaffold. Taken together, the biomaterial developed herein could be a valuable addition to the AMIC family of scaffolds or serve as an off-the-shelf standalone option for cartilage repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vishal Joseph Thomas
- The Laboratory of Orthopaedic Tissue Regeneration & Orthobiologics, Department of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, USA
| | - Nathan Foster Buchweitz
- The Orthopaedic Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Jay John Baek
- The Orthopaedic Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Yongren Wu
- The Orthopaedic Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Jeremy John Mercuri
- The Laboratory of Orthopaedic Tissue Regeneration & Orthobiologics, Department of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, USA
- The Frank H. Stelling and C. Dayton Riddle Orthopaedic Research and Education Laboratory, Clemson University Biomedical Engineering Innovation Campus, Greenville, South Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tropf JG, Dickens JF, LeClere LE. Surgical Treatment of Focal Chondral Lesions of the Knee in the Military Population: Current and Future Therapies. Mil Med 2024; 189:e541-e550. [PMID: 37428507 DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usad250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Revised: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Chondral and osteochondral defects of the knee are common injuries in the military population that have a significant impact on readiness. Definitive treatment of these injuries is challenging since cartilage has a limited capacity for self-repair and regeneration. Management is particularly challenging in military patients who maintain a higher level of activity similar to athletes. Existing surgical techniques have variable results and often long recovery times, sparking the development of several new innovative technologies to return service members back to duty more quickly and effectively after cartilage injury. The purpose of this article is to review the current and future surgical treatments for chondral and osteochondral knee lesions and their relevance in managing these injuries in the military. METHODS In this review article, we describe the current treatments for chondral and osteochondral defects of the knee, reporting on outcomes in military populations. We explore emerging treatment modalities for cartilage defects, reporting innovations, stage of research, and current data. Published results of each treatment option in military populations are reviewed throughout the article. RESULTS This review includes 12 treatments for chondral lesions. Of these therapies, four are considered synthetic and the remaining are considered regenerative solutions. Regenerative therapies tend to perform better in younger, healthier populations with robust healing capacity. Success of treatment depends on lesions and patient characteristics. Nearly all modalities currently available in the USA were successful in improving patients from presurgical function in the short (<6 months) term, but the long-term efficacy is still challenged. Upcoming technologies show promising results in clinical and animal studies that may provide alternative options desirable for the military population. CONCLUSIONS The current treatment options for cartilage lesions are not entirely satisfactory, usually with long recovery times and mixed results. An ideal therapy would be a single procedure that possesses the ability to enable a quick return to activity and duty, alleviate pain, provide long-term durability, and disrupt the progression of osteoarthritis. Evolving technologies for cartilage lesions are expanding beyond currently available techniques that may revolutionize the future of cartilage repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan G Tropf
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Jonathan F Dickens
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Lance E LeClere
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhang Z, Mu Y, Zhou H, Yao H, Wang DA. Cartilage Tissue Engineering in Practice: Preclinical Trials, Clinical Applications, and Prospects. TISSUE ENGINEERING. PART B, REVIEWS 2023; 29:473-490. [PMID: 36964757 DOI: 10.1089/ten.teb.2022.0190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/26/2023]
Abstract
Articular cartilage defects significantly compromise the quality of life in the global population. Although many strategies are needed to repair articular cartilage, including microfracture, autologous osteochondral transplantation, and osteochondral allograft, the therapeutic effects remain suboptimal. In recent years, with the development of cartilage tissue engineering, scientists have continuously improved the formulations of therapeutic cells, biomaterial-based scaffolds, and biological factors, which have opened new avenues for better therapeutics of cartilage lesions. This review focuses on advances in cartilage tissue engineering, particularly in preclinical trials and clinical applications, prospects, and challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhen Zhang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Yulei Mu
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Huiqun Zhou
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Hang Yao
- School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Dong-An Wang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR
- Karolinska Institutet Ming Wai Lau Centre for Reparative Medicine, HKSTP, Sha Tin, Hong Kong SAR
- Shenzhen Research Institute, City University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Campbell MP, Sonnier JH, Wright ML, Freedman KB. Surgical Management of Failed Articular Cartilage Surgery in the Knee. Orthopedics 2023; 46:262-272. [PMID: 37126837 DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20230426-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
Failure rates of cartilage restoration surgery range from 14% to 43%. When failure of prior cartilage restoration surgery is suspected, a thorough clinical workup should be performed to assess the timing and duration of symptoms. Attention should be paid to patient risk factors such as age, body mass index, and smoking status. Concomitant pathology such as malalignment, ligament insufficiency, and meniscus status must be evaluated before revision surgery. As outlined in our treatment algorithm, the size/location of the lesion and the type of primary procedure will guide planning for revision procedures. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(5):262-272.].
Collapse
|
5
|
Ahmadian E, Eftekhari A, Janas D, Vahedi P. Nanofiber scaffolds based on extracellular matrix for articular cartilage engineering: A perspective. Nanotheranostics 2023; 7:61-69. [PMID: 36593799 PMCID: PMC9760364 DOI: 10.7150/ntno.78611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 44.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Articular cartilage has a low self-repair capacity due to the lack of vessels and nerves. In recent times, nanofiber scaffolds have been widely used for this purpose. The optimum nanofiber scaffold should stimulate new tissue's growth and mimic the articular cartilage nature. Furthermore, the characteristics of the scaffold should match those of the cellular matrix components of the native tissue to best merge with the target tissue. Therefore, selective modification of prefabricated scaffolds based on the structure of the repaired tissues is commonly conducted to promote restoring the tissue. A thorough analysis is required to find out the architectural features of scaffolds that are essential to make the treatment successful. The current review aims to target this challenge. The article highlights different optimization approaches of nanofibrous scaffolds for improved cartilage tissue engineering. In this context, the influence of the architecture of nanoscaffolds on performance is discussed in detail. Finally, based on the gathered information, a future outlook is provided to catalyze development in this promising field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elham Ahmadian
- Kidney Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Aziz Eftekhari
- Research Center for Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology, Biomedicine Institute, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran,Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran,✉ Corresponding authors: Aziz Eftekhari (), Dawid Janas (), Parviz Vahedi ()
| | - Dawid Janas
- Department of Organic Chemistry, Bioorganic Chemistry and Biotechnology, Silesian University of Technology, B. Krzywoustego 4, 44-100, Gliwice, Poland,✉ Corresponding authors: Aziz Eftekhari (), Dawid Janas (), Parviz Vahedi ()
| | - Parviz Vahedi
- Department of Anatomical Sciences, Maragheh University of Medical Sciences, Maragheh 78151-55158, Iran,✉ Corresponding authors: Aziz Eftekhari (), Dawid Janas (), Parviz Vahedi ()
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ehmann YJ, Esser T, Seyam A, Rupp MC, Mehl J, Siebenlist S, Imhoff AB, Minzlaff P. Low postoperative complication rate with high survival rate and good clinical outcome 9 years after autologous chondrocyte transplantation of the knee joint. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2022; 143:2665-2674. [PMID: 36198844 PMCID: PMC10110693 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-022-04611-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate postoperative complications and associated risk factors for failure following autologous chondrocyte transplantation ("ACT") as well as its long-term survival and clinical function. It was hypothesized that ACT is a safe technique for cartilage repair with a low incidence of postoperative complications and rare rates of revision surgery combined with a high long-term survival and good to excellent clinical outcome in long-term-follow-up. METHODS All patients undergoing ACT-Cs of the knee joint between 2006 and 2012 at the author's institution were included in this retrospective study. Concomitant procedures had been performed if necessary. Early postoperative complications, revision surgeries, failure and risk factors for those events were evaluated 6 months after the surgery. Long-term clinical outcome was assessed using the Lysholm Score, the Tegner Score, a 10-grade scale for satisfaction and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at a minimum follow-up of 9 years postoperatively. Long-term survival was calculated using revision surgeries, clinical failures and conversion procedures to create a Kaplan-Meier analysis. A subgroup analysis for different defect locations was performed. 139 patients were included in this study (27% female/ 73%male; age 26.7 [21.7; 35.2] years). The median defect size was 4.0 [3.0; 6.0] cm2 (40% medial femoral condyle (MFC), 17% lateral femoral condyle (LFC), 36% patella, 19% trochlea). 97 (70%) of the patients had undergone previous surgery and 84 (60%) underwent concomitant procedures. RESULTS Postoperatively, 8% of patients had complications (4% bleeding, 2% arthrofibrosis, 2% infection), 7% of patients needed revision surgery. 12% of patients had a prolonged deficit in ROM, that did not require revision surgery. No significant difference in terms of complications was found between the patellofemoral and femorotibial group. Patients demonstrated good patient reported long-term outcomes 9-15 years after the index surgery (Tegner: 4.7 ± 1.8; VAS: 2.4 ± 2.1; Lysholm: 80 ± 14; satisfaction with operation: 7.3 ± 1.9). Survival rates were 88% at 9 years, 85% at 11 years, and 85% at 13 years after the index procedure. Reasons for failure included debridement of ACT (n = 4; 5%), revision ACT (n = 3, 3%), conversion to total knee arthroplasty (n = 3, 3%) and conversion to High tibial osteotomy (HTO) (n = 1; 1%)). CONCLUSION The present study indicates ACT as an effective treatment option for femorotibial- as well as patellofemoral cartilage defects with a high long-term survival and low conversion rate as well as good long-term results regarding knee function and satisfaction. Postoperative complications needing revision surgery are rare. Prolongated deficits of range of motion appear frequently up to six months especially in patellofemoral defects, but can often be successfully addressed by intensified physiotherapy without requiring an arthrolysis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yannick J Ehmann
- Department of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Thekla Esser
- Department of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Orthoclinic Agatharied, Agatharied, Germany
| | - Amr Seyam
- Department of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Marco-Christopher Rupp
- Department of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Julian Mehl
- Department of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Sebastian Siebenlist
- Department of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas B Imhoff
- Department of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
| | - Philipp Minzlaff
- Department of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.,Department of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Orthoclinic Agatharied, Agatharied, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Steinmetz RG, Guth JJ, Matava MJ, Smith MV, Brophy RH. Global Variation in Studies of Articular Cartilage Procedures of the Knee: A Systematic Review. Cartilage 2022; 13:19476035221098169. [PMID: 35578752 PMCID: PMC9251824 DOI: 10.1177/19476035221098169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to determine whether there are significant differences in terms of indications, techniques, patient variables, and objective and subjective outcome scores as a function of the geographic locale of published studies of knee articular cartilage surgery. METHODS An electronic database search was performed of clinical studies evaluating knee articular cartilage procedures from 2000 to 2021. Studies were separated into global regions (Europe, Asia, North America, and South America) based on the study country. All cartilage-based treatments in each region were recorded. Patient age and sex, mechanism of injury, cartilage lesion size and location, follow-up time, failure rate, and knee outcome scores utilized were summarized and compared by region. RESULTS A total of 2,923 studies were analyzed. Eighty level 1 and 2 studies met the inclusion criteria. The majority were from Europe (n = 60), followed by Asia (n = 11), North America (n = 7), and South America (n = 2). The majority of procedures in European and North American studies were cell-based and marrow-stimulation procedures. In Asian studies, the most common procedures were marrow-stimulation, experimental, and biologic procedures as defined by the authors. Asian countries had a higher proportion of females (P < 0.001) and an overall older patient population (P < 0.001). Regional variation was also seen in terms of lesion location, mechanism of injury, and failure rate. CONCLUSION Most high-level evidence for articular cartilage-based procedures of the knee comes from European countries. These studies vary by patient age and sex, anatomic location, and mechanism of injury. Global variation should be taken into consideration when interpreting and applying studies of knee articular cartilage surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R. Garrett Steinmetz
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery,
Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - J. Jared Guth
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery,
Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Matthew J. Matava
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery,
Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Matthew V. Smith
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery,
Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Robert H. Brophy
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery,
Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA,Robert H. Brophy, Department of Orthopedic
Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 14532 South Outer Forty
Drive, St. Louis, MO 63017, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Matthews JR, Brutico J, Heard J, Chauhan K, Tucker B, Freedman KB. Comparison of clinical outcomes following osteochondral allograft transplantation for osteochondral versus chondral defects in the knee. Knee Surg Relat Res 2022; 34:23. [PMID: 35509057 PMCID: PMC9066852 DOI: 10.1186/s43019-022-00149-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Accepted: 04/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation is a restorative technique for addressing articular cartilage defects by transferring mature viable chondrocytes with subchondral bone into size-matched lesions. The purpose of this study was to compare differences in clinical and functional outcomes in patients treated with OCA for osteochondral defects compared with isolated chondral pathology.
Methods A retrospective review identified patients who underwent OCA transplantation and grouped them into osteochondral or isolated chondral pathology. Demographic data, surgical history, lesion characteristics, complications, and rate of subsequent surgery were reviewed. The review included 86 patients (24 osteochondral, 62 chondral) with a mean follow-up of 5.4 ± 1.4 years. Outcome measures included the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR.), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) physical scores. Failure was defined to include revision OCA, graft removal, conversion to ACI, or conversion to arthroplasty.
Results The average age at surgery was 32.3 and 37.3 years for the osteochondral and chondral groups, respectively (P = 0.056). The medial femoral condyle was the most common defect location in both groups. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Patients with osteochondral pathology had significantly greater KOOS JR., IKDC, and SF-12 scores (P < 0.05), and fewer failures were reported in the osteochondral group (8.3% versus 32.3%, P = 0.045). When controlling for age, sex, laterality, BMI, and presence of a concomitant procedure, patients with osteochondral pathology were found to have better KOOS and IKDC scores, but there was no difference in SF12 scores or rates of failure between groups.
Conclusion The findings of this study indicate that patients undergoing OCA for osteochondral defects may have greater functional outcomes and similar failure rates compared with OCA transplantation for isolated chondral pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Reza Matthews
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson Rothman Institute Sports Fellow, 925 Chestnut St., Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
| | - Joseph Brutico
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rothman Institute Research Fellow, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Jeremy Heard
- Internal Medicine Resident, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Kashyap Chauhan
- Internal Medicine Resident, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Bradford Tucker
- Cartilage Restoration Center, Orthopaedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson Rothman Institute, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Kevin Blake Freedman
- Cartilage Restoration Center, Orthopaedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson Rothman Institute, Philadelphia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Niemeyer P, Hanus M, Belickas J, László T, Gudas R, Fiodorovas M, Cebatorius A, Pastucha M, Hoza P, Magos K, Izadpanah K, Paša L, Vásárhelyi G, Sisák K, Mohyla M, Farkas C, Kessler O, Kybal S, Spiro R, Köhler A, Kirner A, Trattnig S, Gaissmaier C. Treatment of Large Cartilage Defects in the Knee by Hydrogel-Based Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation: Two-Year Results of a Prospective, Multicenter, Single-Arm Phase III Trial. Cartilage 2022; 13:19476035221085146. [PMID: 35354310 PMCID: PMC9137299 DOI: 10.1177/19476035221085146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the clinical outcome of a hydrogel-based autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) for large articular cartilage defects in the knee joint. DESIGN Prospective, multicenter, single-arm, phase III clinical trial. ACI was performed in 100 patients with focal full-thickness cartilage defects ranging from 4 to 12 cm2 in size. The primary outcome measure was the responder rate at 2 years using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). RESULTS Two years after ACI treatment, 93% of patients were KOOS responders having improved by ≥10 points compared with their pre-operative level. The primary endpoint of the study was met and demonstrated that the KOOS response rate is markedly greater than 40% with a lower 95% CI (confidence interval) of 86.1, more than twice the pre-specified no-effect level. KOOS improvement (least squares mean) was 42.0 ± 1.8 points (95% CI between 38.4 and 45.7). Mean changes from baseline were significant in the overall KOOS and in all 5 KOOS subscores from Month 3 (first measurement) to Month 24 (inclusive) (P < 0.0001). The mean MOCART (Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue) score after 24 months reached 80.0 points (95% CI: 70.0-90.0 points) and 92.1 points in lesions ≤ 5 cm2. CONCLUSIONS Overall, hydrogel-based ACI proved to be a valuable treatment option for patients with large cartilage defects in the knee as demonstrated by early, statistically significant, and clinically meaningful improvement up to 2 years follow-up. Parallel to the clinical improvements, MRI analyses suggested increasing maturation, re-organization, and integration of the repair tissue. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT03319797; EudraCT No.: 2016-002817-22.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - M. Hanus
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - J. Belickas
- Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - T. László
- Clinic of Traumatology, Jász-Nagykun-Szolnok County Hetényi Géza Hospital, Szolnok, Hungary
| | - R. Gudas
- Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kaunas Clinics, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | | | | | - M. Pastucha
- Department of Orthopaedics, Hořovice Hospital, Hořovice, Czech Republic
| | - P. Hoza
- Department of Orthopaedics, Pardubice Hospital, Pardubice, Czech Republic
| | - K. Magos
- Kastélypark Clinic, Tata, Hungary
| | - K. Izadpanah
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - L. Paša
- Clinic of Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk Univerzity Brno and Úrazová Nemocnice, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - G. Vásárhelyi
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Uzsoki Hospital, Budapest, Hungary
| | - K. Sisák
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - M. Mohyla
- Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospital in Ostrava, Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic
| | - C. Farkas
- Department of Orthopaedics, Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg County Hospitals, University Teaching Hospital, Nyíregyháza, Hungary
| | - O. Kessler
- Center for Orthopedics & Sports, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - S. Kybal
- Orthopaedics Department of Hospital Benešov, Benešov, Czech Republic
| | - R. Spiro
- Aesculap Biologics, LLC, Breinigsville, PA, USA
| | - A. Köhler
- TETEC—Tissue Engineering Technologies AG, Reutlingen, Germany
| | - A. Kirner
- TETEC—Tissue Engineering Technologies AG, Reutlingen, Germany
| | - S. Trattnig
- The High Field MR Centre, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - C. Gaissmaier
- TETEC—Tissue Engineering Technologies AG, Reutlingen, Germany,Christoph Gaissmaier, TETEC—Tissue Engineering Technologies AG, Aspenhaustr. 18, 72770 Reutlingen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rodriguez-Merchan EC, Encinas-Ullan CA, Liddle AD. Osteochondral Allografts for Large Osteochondral Lesions of the Knee Joint: Indications, Surgical Techniques and Results. THE ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY 2022; 10:245-251. [PMID: 35514761 PMCID: PMC9034800 DOI: 10.22038/abjs.2021.51810.2555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 01/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
The main indications for osteochondral allografts (OCA) transplantation of the knee are the following: Symptomatic full-thickness cartilage lesions greater than 3 cm2; deep lesions with subchondral damage; and revision techniques when a previous surgical procedure has failed. Dowel and shell techniques are the two most commonly used for OCA transplantation. The dowel technique is appropriate in most cartilage lesions; however, geometrically irregular lesions may need the shell technique. Factors related to better outcomes after OCA transplantation are the following: unipolar lesions; patients younger than 30 years; traumatic lesions; and when the treatment is carried out within 12 months from the onset of symptoms. A systematic review found a survivorship rate of 89% at 5 years. Other systematic review showed a mean failure rate of 25% at 12 years with a reoperation rate of 36%. Seventy-two per cent of the failures were conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) (68%) or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) (4%). Twenty-eight per cent of failures were graft removal, graft fixation, and graft revision. In this systematic review, patellofemoral lesions (83%) had a higher reoperation rate than lesions affecting the tibial plateau or the femoral condyles. Overall, OCA transplantation showed a successful result in 75% of patients at 12 years follow-up.
Collapse
|
11
|
Cogan CJ, Friedman J, You J, Zhang AL, Feeley BT, Ma CB, Lansdown DA. Prior Bone Marrow Stimulation Surgery Influences Outcomes After Cell-Based Cartilage Restoration: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Orthop J Sports Med 2022; 9:23259671211035384. [PMID: 35146031 PMCID: PMC8822078 DOI: 10.1177/23259671211035384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Accepted: 04/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Cell-based cartilage restoration with autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) is a safe and effective treatment for symptomatic cartilage lesions. Many patients undergoing ACI have a history of prior surgery, including bone marrow stimulation (BMS). There is mounting evidence that a history of prior BMS may impede healing of the ACI graft. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to compare the failure rates of primary ACI with ACI after prior BMS. We hypothesized that ACI after BMS would have a significantly higher failure rate (defined as reoperation, conversion to arthroplasty, and/or imaging-based failure) compared with primary ACI. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A literature search was performed by use of PubMed and Embase databases for relevant articles published through October 2, 2020, to identify studies evaluating outcomes and failures rates of ACI after prior BMS in the knee. Results: Included were 11 studies comprising 1479 ACI procedures. The mean age at surgery ranged from 18.3 to 39.1 years, and the mean follow-up ranged from 3 to 20.6 years. All studies reported failure rates. The overall failure rate was significantly higher in the patients who underwent ACI after BMS, at 26.4% compared with 14.8% in the ACI group (P < .001). Meta-analysis demonstrated an increased risk of failure in patients with a history of prior BMS (log odds ratio = –0.90 [95% confidence interval, –1.38 to –0.42]). Conclusion: This systematic review demonstrated that failure rates were significantly higher for patients treated with ACI after BMS relative to patients undergoing ACI without prior BMS. This finding has important implications when considering the use of BMS for defects that are amenable to cell-based restoration and when determining treatment options after failed BMS. Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42020180387).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles J Cogan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - James Friedman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jae You
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Alan L Zhang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Brian T Feeley
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - C Benjamin Ma
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Drew A Lansdown
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Matthews JR, Brutico JM, Abraham DT, Heard JC, Tucker BS, Tjoumakaris FP, Freedman KB. Differences in Clinical and Functional Outcomes Between Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation and Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation for the Treatment of Focal Articular Cartilage Defects. Orthop J Sports Med 2022; 10:23259671211058425. [PMID: 35155699 PMCID: PMC8832612 DOI: 10.1177/23259671211058425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Articular cartilage pathology can result from a spectrum of origins, including trauma, osteochondritis dissecans, avascular necrosis, or degenerative joint disease. Purpose: To compare the differences in clinical and patient-reported outcomes after autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) versus osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA) in patients with focal articular cartilage defects without underlying bone loss. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective review identified patients who underwent ACI or OCA between 2008 and 2016 for isolated grades 3 and 4 articular cartilage defects without underlying bone loss. Outcome measures included the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) evaluation, and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey–Physical Component (SF-12-P) scores. Defect location, size, complications, and rate of subsequent surgery were determined. Results: Overall, 148 patients were included: 82 (55%) underwent ACI and 66 (45%) underwent OCA. The mean age at the time of surgery was 31.2 years within the ACI cohort and 37.7 years within the OCA cohort (P < .001); the mean follow-up for both cohorts was 6.7 years (P = .902). Within the ACI group, 28 (34%) patients had multifocal defects, 21 (26%) had defects confined to the femoral condyles, and 33 (40%) had defects in the patellofemoral region. Within the OCA group, 23 (35%) patients had multifocal defects, 30 (46%) had confined femoral condyle lesions, and 13 (20%) had patellofemoral defects. When comparing by lesion location, there were no significant differences in KOOS JR, and IKDC scores between the ACI and OCA cohorts (P < .05). There was, however, a significant difference for SF-12-P scores for FDD trochlear lesions. In both cohorts, traumatic patellofemoral pathology demonstrated lower patient-reported outcomes and higher failure rates than degenerative lesions. The overall rate of failure, defined as graft failure with revision surgery and/or conversion to arthroplasty, was significantly greater in the OCA group (21% vs 4%; P = .002). Conclusion: Study results indicated that ACI provides similar outcomes to OCA with or without concomitant procedures for the treatment of symptomatic articular cartilage defects in all lesion locations and may have a lower revision rate for multifocal and condylar lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John R. Matthews
- Thomas Jefferson Rothman Orthopedic Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Joseph M. Brutico
- Thomas Jefferson Rothman Orthopedic Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Jeremy C. Heard
- Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Bradford S. Tucker
- Thomas Jefferson Rothman Orthopedic Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Kevin B. Freedman
- Thomas Jefferson Rothman Orthopedic Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hede K, Christensen BB, Jensen J, Foldager CB, Lind M. Combined Bone Marrow Aspirate and Platelet-Rich Plasma for Cartilage Repair: Two-Year Clinical Results. Cartilage 2021; 13:937S-947S. [PMID: 31538811 PMCID: PMC8808891 DOI: 10.1177/1947603519876329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the clinical and biological outcome of combined bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on a collagen scaffold for treating cartilage lesions in the knee. METHODS AND MATERIALS Ten patients (mean age 29.4 years, range 18-36) suffering from large full-thickness cartilage in the knee were treated with BMAC and PRP from January 2015 to December 2016. In a 1-step procedure autologous BMAC and PRP was seeded onto a collagen scaffold and sutured into the debrided defect. Patients were evaluated by clinical outcome scores (IKDC [International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form], KOOS [Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score], and pain score using the Numeric Rating Scale [NRS]) preoperatively, after 3 months, and after 1 and 2 years. Second-look arthroscopies were performed (n = 7) with biopsies of the repair tissue for histology. All patients had magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) preoperatively, after 1 year, and after 2 to 3.5 years with MOCART (magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue) scores evaluating cartilage repair. RESULTS After 1 year significant improvements were found in IKDC, KOOS symptoms, KOOS ADL (Activities of Daily Living), KOOS QOL (Quality of Life), and pain at activity. At the latest follow-up significant improvements were seen in IKDC, KOOS symptoms, KOOS QOL, pain at rest, and pain at activity. MRI MOCART score for cartilage repair improved significantly from baseline to 1-year follow-up. Histomorphometry of repair tissue demonstrated a mixture of fibrous tissue (58%) and fibrocartilage (40%). CONCLUSION Treatment of cartilage injuries using combined BMAC and PRP improved subjective clinical outcome scores and pain scores at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. MRI and histology indicated repair tissue inferior to the native hyaline cartilage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kris Hede
- Orthopedic Research Laboratory, Aarhus
University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark,Kris Tvilum Chadwick Hede, Orthopaedic
Research Lab, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99,
Section J, Level 1, Aarhus 8200, Denmark.
| | | | - Jonas Jensen
- Department of Radiology, Aarhus
University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Casper B. Foldager
- Orthopedic Research Laboratory, Aarhus
University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark,Department of Orthopedics, Aarhus
University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Martin Lind
- Department of Orthopedics, Aarhus
University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hinckel BB, Thomas D, Vellios EE, Hancock KJ, Calcei JG, Sherman SL, Eliasberg CD, Fernandes TL, Farr J, Lattermann C, Gomoll AH. Algorithm for Treatment of Focal Cartilage Defects of the Knee: Classic and New Procedures. Cartilage 2021; 13:473S-495S. [PMID: 33745340 PMCID: PMC8808924 DOI: 10.1177/1947603521993219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To create a treatment algorithm for focal grade 3 or 4 cartilage defects of the knee using both classic and novel cartilage restoration techniques. DESIGN A comprehensive review of the literature was performed highlighting classic as well as novel cartilage restoration techniques supported by clinical and/or basic science research and currently being employed by orthopedic surgeons. RESULTS There is a high level of evidence to support the treatment of small to medium size lesions (<2-4 cm2) without subchondral bone involvement with traditional techniques such as marrow stimulation, osteochondral autograft transplant (OAT), or osteochondral allograft transplant (OCA). Newer techniques such as autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis and bone marrow aspirate concentrate implantation have also been shown to be effective in select studies. If subchondral bone loss is present OAT or OCA should be performed. For large lesions (>4 cm2), OCA or matrix autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) may be performed. OCA is preferred over MACI in the setting of subchondral bone involvement while cell-based modalities such as MACI or particulated juvenile allograft cartilage are preferred in the patellofemoral joint. CONCLUSIONS Numerous techniques exist for the orthopedic surgeon treating focal cartilage defects of the knee. Treatment strategies should be based on lesion size, lesion location, subchondral bone involvement, and the level of evidence supporting each technique in the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Betina B. Hinckel
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery,
William Beaumont Hospital, Taylor, MI, USA
| | - Dimitri Thomas
- UNC Orthopedics and Sports Medicine at
Lenoir, Kinston, NC, USA
| | - Evan E. Vellios
- Sports Medicine and Shoulder Surgeon
Southern California Orthopedic Institute (SCOI), Van Nuys, CA, USA
| | | | - Jacob G. Calcei
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH,
USA
| | - Seth L. Sherman
- Division of Sports Medicine, Department
of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA,
USA
| | | | - Tiago L. Fernandes
- University of São Paulo, Institute of
Orthopedics and Traumatology, Sports Medicine–FIFA, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Jack Farr
- OrthoIndy Knee Preservation and
Cartilage Restoration Center, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis,
IN, USA
| | - Christian Lattermann
- Division of Sports Medicine,
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA,
USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Commins J, Irwin R, Matuska A, Goodale M, Delco M, Fortier L. Biological Mechanisms for Cartilage Repair Using a BioCartilage Scaffold: Cellular Adhesion/Migration and Bioactive Proteins. Cartilage 2021; 13:984S-992S. [PMID: 31965816 PMCID: PMC8808849 DOI: 10.1177/1947603519900803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective. BioCartilage is a desiccated, particulated cartilage allograft used for repair of focal cartilage defects. It is mixed with a biologic such as bone marrow concentrate (BMC), pressed into a contained defect, and sealed with fibrin glue. The objective of this study was to assess if BioCartilage could serve as a bioactive scaffold by affecting cellular adhesion, cellular migration, or the release interleukin-1 receptor antagonist protein (IL-1RA), and to identify its full proteomic makeup. Design. Cartilage explants were used to model confined defects. BioCartilage was mixed with BMC, grafted into defects, and sealed with 1 of 5 fibrin glues. Constructs were cultured for 24 or 48 hours and then processed for live/dead microscopy. Chondrocyte and mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) adhesion on BioCartilage was assessed using scanning electron microscopy. Conditioned medium from cultures and the biologics used in the study were assayed for IL-1RA. The protein footprint of BioCartilage was determined using bottom-up proteomics. Results. BioCartilage supported chondrocyte and MSC attachment within 24 hours, and cell viability was retained in all constructs at 24 and 48 hours. Fibrin glue did not inhibit cell attachment. BMC had the highest concentration of IL-1RA. Proteomics yielded 254 proteins, including collagens, proteoglycans, and several bioactive proteins with known anabolic roles including cartilage oligomeric matrix protein. Conclusions. This study suggests that BioCartilage has the chemical composition and architecture to support cell adherence and migration and to provide bioactive proteins, which together should have biologics advantages in cartilage repair beyond its role as a scaffold.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rebecca Irwin
- Department of Biomedical Engineering,
Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
| | | | - Margaret Goodale
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Cornell
University, Ithaca, NY, USA
| | - Michelle Delco
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Cornell
University, Ithaca, NY, USA
| | - Lisa Fortier
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Cornell
University, Ithaca, NY, USA,Lisa Fortier, Department of Clinical
Sciences, Cornell University, 930 Campus Road, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Nakagawa Y, Mukai S, Maeda T, Akamatsu S, Satomi K, Nakamura R. Midterm Outcomes of Autologous Osteochondral Graft Transplantation Only in the Femoral Condyle without Treating the Tibial Plateau with Subchondral Bone Exposed. Cartilage 2021; 13:1178S-1186S. [PMID: 33095027 PMCID: PMC8808809 DOI: 10.1177/1947603520967066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to examine the midterm clinical outcomes of autologous osteochondral grafts (AOG) that were performed in the femoral condyle without treating the tibial plateau with subchondral bone exposed, and to compare these outcomes with those of AOG used in patients with osteoarthritis (lateral type or medial type) or osteonecrosis. DESIGN The study included 6 men and 16 women and 11 right knees and 11 left knees. The mean operative age was 56.0 years (range, 21-76 years), and the mean follow-up period was 98.4 months (range, 60-164 months). Six patients had lateral type osteoarthritis (OAL), 7 had medial type osteoarthritis (OAM), and 9 had osteonecrosis (ON). The patients' knee symptoms as their clinical outcome were evaluated using the knee scoring system of the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA), and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score. RESULTS The postoperative clinical outcomes of the OAL and ON group were significantly better than their preoperative clinical scores and remained the same until the final follow-up. However, the clinical outcomes of OAM improved 2 years after AOG, but eventually decreased thereafter. The number of worse cases in the OAM group was significantly larger than those in the OAL and ON groups. CONCLUSION In these procedures, the postoperative clinical outcomes of the OAL and ON groups were significantly better than their preoperative clinical scores and were maintained for about 8 years. However, the clinical outcomes of OAM improved until 2 years after AOG, but eventually decreased thereafter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasuaki Nakagawa
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan,Yasuaki Nakagawa, Department of Orthopaedic
Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, 1-1 Fukakusa
Mukaihata-cho Fushimi-ku, Kyoto, 612-8555, Japan.
| | - Shogo Mukai
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takahiro Maeda
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Shota Akamatsu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kentaro Satomi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Ryota Nakamura
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ex vivo osteochondral test system with control over cartilage defect depth – A pilot study to investigate the effect of oxygen tension and chondrocyte based treatments in chondral and full thickness defects in an organ model. OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE OPEN 2021; 3:100173. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2021.100173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Revised: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
|
18
|
Sartore L, Manferdini C, Saleh Y, Dey K, Gabusi E, Ramorino G, Zini N, Almici C, Re F, Russo D, Mariani E, Lisignoli G. Polysaccharides on gelatin-based hydrogels differently affect chondrogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stromal cells. MATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING. C, MATERIALS FOR BIOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS 2021; 126:112175. [PMID: 34082976 DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2021.112175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2021] [Revised: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Selection of feasible hybrid-hydrogels for best chondrogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stromal cells (hMSCs) represents an important challenge in cartilage regeneration. In this study, three-dimensional hybrid hydrogels obtained by chemical crosslinking of poly (ethylene glycol) diglycidyl ether (PEGDGE), gelatin (G) without or with chitosan (Ch) or dextran (Dx) polysaccharides were developed. The hydrogels, namely G-PEG, G-PEG-Ch and G-PEG-Dx, were prepared with an innovative, versatile and cell-friendly technique that involves two preparation steps specifically chosen to increase the degree of crosslinking and the physical-mechanical stability of the product: a first homogeneous phase reaction followed by directional freezing, freeze-drying and post-curing. Chondrogenic differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (hBM-MSC) was tested on these hydrogels to ascertain whether the presence of different polysaccharides could favor the formation of the native cartilage structure. We demonstrated that the hydrogels exhibited an open pore porous morphology with high interconnectivity and the incorporation of Ch and Dx into the G-PEG common backbone determined a slightly reduced stiffness compared to that of G-PEG hydrogels. We demonstrated that G-PEG-Dx showed a significant increase of its anisotropic characteristic and G-PEG-Ch exhibited higher and faster stress relaxation behavior than the other hydrogels. These characteristics were associated to absence of chondrogenic differentiation on G-PEG-Dx scaffold and good chondrogenic differentiation on G-PEG and G-PEG-Ch. Furthermore, G-PEG-Ch induced the minor collagen proteins and the formation of collagen fibrils with a diameter like native cartilage. This study demonstrated that both anisotropic and stress relaxation characteristics of the hybrid hydrogels were important features directly influencing the chondrogenic differentiation potentiality of hBM-MSC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luciana Sartore
- Dipartimento di Ingegneria Meccanica e Industriale, Università degli Studi di Brescia, Via Branze 38, 25123 Brescia, Italy
| | - Cristina Manferdini
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, SC Laboratorio di Immunoreumatologia e Rigenerazione Tissutale, via di Barbiano 1/10, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - Yasmin Saleh
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, SC Laboratorio di Immunoreumatologia e Rigenerazione Tissutale, via di Barbiano 1/10, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - Kamol Dey
- Dipartimento di Ingegneria Meccanica e Industriale, Università degli Studi di Brescia, Via Branze 38, 25123 Brescia, Italy; Department of Applied Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Science, University of Chittagong, Chittagong-4331, Bangladesh
| | - Elena Gabusi
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, SC Laboratorio di Immunoreumatologia e Rigenerazione Tissutale, via di Barbiano 1/10, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - Giorgio Ramorino
- Dipartimento di Ingegneria Meccanica e Industriale, Università degli Studi di Brescia, Via Branze 38, 25123 Brescia, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Zini
- CNR Institute of Molecular Genetics "Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza", Unit of Bologna, via di Barbiano 1/10, 40136 Bologna, Italy; IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, via di Barbiano 1/10, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - Camillo Almici
- Laboratory for Stem Cells Manipulation and Cryopreservation, Department of Transfusion Medicine, ASST Spedali Civili, P.le Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy
| | - Federica Re
- Unit of Blood Disease and Bone marrow Transplantation, DPT of Clinical and Experimental Science, Brescia University and ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, P.le Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy
| | - Domenico Russo
- Unit of Blood Disease and Bone marrow Transplantation, DPT of Clinical and Experimental Science, Brescia University and ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, P.le Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy
| | - Erminia Mariani
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, SC Laboratorio di Immunoreumatologia e Rigenerazione Tissutale, via di Barbiano 1/10, 40136 Bologna, Italy; DIMEC, Alma Mater Studiorum, Università di Bologna, via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Gina Lisignoli
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, SC Laboratorio di Immunoreumatologia e Rigenerazione Tissutale, via di Barbiano 1/10, 40136 Bologna, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Co CM, Izuagbe S, Zhou J, Zhou N, Sun X, Borrelli J, Tang L. Click chemistry-based pre-targeting cell delivery for cartilage regeneration. Regen Biomater 2021; 8:rbab018. [PMID: 34211730 DOI: 10.1093/rb/rbab018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Revised: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 04/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
A fraction of the OA patient population is affected by post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) following acute joint injuries. Stopping or reversing the progression of PTOA following joint injury could improve long-term functional outcomes, reduced disability, and medical costs. To more effectively treat articular cartilage injury, we have developed a novel cell-based therapy that involves the pre-targeting of apoptotic chondrocytes and the delivery of healthy, metabolically active chondrocytes using click chemistry. Specifically, a pre-targeting agent was prepared via conjugating apoptotic binding peptide (ApoPep-1) and trans-cyclooctene (TCO) onto polyethylene glycol (PEG) polymer carrier. The pre-targeting agent would be introduced to injured areas of articular cartilage, leading to the accumulation of TCO groups on the injured areas from actively binding to apoptotic chondrocytes. Subsequently, methyltetrazine (Tz)-bearing chondrocytes would be immobilized on the surface of TCO-coated injured cartilage via Tz-TCO click chemistry reaction. Using an ex vivo human cartilage explant PTOA model, the effectiveness of this new approach was evaluated. Our studies show that this novel approach (Tz-TCO click chemistry) significantly enhanced the immobilization of healthy and metabolically active chondrocytes to the areas of apoptotic chondrocytes. Histological analyses demonstrated that this treatment regimen would significantly reduce the area of cartilage degeneration and enhance ECM regeneration. The results support that Tz-TCO click chemistry-mediated cell delivery approach has great potential in clinical applications for targeting and treatment of cartilage injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cynthia M Co
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Texas at Arlington, PO Box 19138, Arlington, TX 76019, USA
| | - Samira Izuagbe
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Texas at Arlington, PO Box 19138, Arlington, TX 76019, USA
| | - Jun Zhou
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Texas at Arlington, PO Box 19138, Arlington, TX 76019, USA
| | - Ning Zhou
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Xiankai Sun
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Joseph Borrelli
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Texas at Arlington, PO Box 19138, Arlington, TX 76019, USA
| | - Liping Tang
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Texas at Arlington, PO Box 19138, Arlington, TX 76019, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Dekker TJ, Aman ZS, DePhillipo NN, Dickens JF, Anz AW, LaPrade RF. Chondral Lesions of the Knee: An Evidence-Based Approach. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2021; 103:629-645. [PMID: 33470591 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.20.01161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
➤ Management of chondral lesions of the knee is challenging and requires assessment of several factors including the size and location of the lesion, limb alignment and rotation, and the physical and mental health of the individual patient. ➤ There are a multitude of options to address chondral pathologies of the knee that allow individualized treatment for the specific needs and demands of the patient. ➤ Osteochondral autograft transfer remains a durable and predictable graft option in smaller lesions (<2 cm2) in the young and active patient population. ➤ Both mid-term and long-term results for large chondral lesions (≥3 cm2) of the knee have demonstrated favorable results with the use of osteochondral allograft or matrix-associated chondrocyte implantation. ➤ Treatment options for small lesions (<2 cm2) include osteochondral autograft transfer and marrow stimulation and/or microfracture with biologic adjunct, while larger lesions (≥2 cm2) are typically treated with osteochondral allograft transplantation, particulated juvenile articular cartilage, or matrix-associated chondrocyte implantation. ➤ Emerging technologies, such as allograft scaffolds and cryopreserved allograft, are being explored for different graft sources to address complex knee chondral pathology; however, further study is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Travis J Dekker
- Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery, Eglin Air Force Base, Eglin, Florida
| | - Zachary S Aman
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Jonathan F Dickens
- Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Adam W Anz
- Andrews Research & Education Foundation, Gulf Breeze, Florida
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Görtz S, Tabbaa SM, Jones DG, Polousky JD, Crawford DC, Bugbee WD, Cole BJ, Farr J, Fleischli JE, Getgood A, Gomoll AH, Gross AE, Krych AJ, Lattermann C, Mandelbaum BR, Mandt PR, Mirzayan R, Mologne TS, Provencher MT, Rodeo SA, Safir O, Strauss ED, Wahl CJ, Williams RJ, Yanke AB. Metrics of OsteoChondral Allografts (MOCA) Group Consensus Statements on the Use of Viable Osteochondral Allograft. Orthop J Sports Med 2021; 9:2325967120983604. [PMID: 34250153 PMCID: PMC8237219 DOI: 10.1177/2325967120983604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 07/31/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation has evolved into a first-line
treatment for large chondral and osteochondral defects, aided by
advancements in storage protocols and a growing body of clinical evidence
supporting successful clinical outcomes and long-term survivorship. Despite
the body of literature supporting OCAs, there still remains controversy and
debate in the surgical application of OCA, especially where high-level
evidence is lacking. Purpose: To develop consensus among an expert group with extensive clinical and
scientific experience in OCA, addressing controversies in the treatment of
chondral and osteochondral defects with OCA transplantation. Study Design: Consensus statement. Methods: A focus group of clinical experts on OCA cartilage restoration participated
in a 3-round modified Delphi process to generate a list of statements and
establish consensus. Questions and statements were initially developed on
specific topics that lack scientific evidence and lead to debate and
controversy in the clinical community. In-person discussion occurred where
statements were not agreed on after 2 rounds of voting. After final voting,
the percentage of agreement and level of consensus were characterized. A
systematic literature review was performed, and the level of evidence and
grade were established for each statement. Results: Seventeen statements spanning surgical technique, graft matching,
indications, and rehabilitation reached consensus after the final round of
voting. Of the 17 statements that reached consensus, 11 received unanimous
(100%) agreement, and 6 received strong (80%-99%) agreement. Conclusion: The outcomes of this study led to the establishment of consensus statements
that provide guidance on surgical and perioperative management of OCAs. The
findings also provided insights on topics requiring more research or
high-quality studies to further establish consensus and provide stronger
evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Görtz
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Suzanne M Tabbaa
- University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Deryk G Jones
- Ochsner Sports Medicine Institute, Jefferson, Louisiana, USA
| | - John D Polousky
- Children's Health Andrews Institute for Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Plano, Texas, USA
| | | | | | - William D Bugbee
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.,Ochsner Sports Medicine Institute, Jefferson, Louisiana, USA.,Children's Health Andrews Institute for Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Plano, Texas, USA.,Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Investigation performed at Metrics of Osteochondral Allografts (MOCA), JRF Ortho, Centennial, Colorado, USA
| | - Brian J Cole
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.,Ochsner Sports Medicine Institute, Jefferson, Louisiana, USA.,Children's Health Andrews Institute for Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Plano, Texas, USA.,Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Investigation performed at Metrics of Osteochondral Allografts (MOCA), JRF Ortho, Centennial, Colorado, USA
| | - Jack Farr
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.,Ochsner Sports Medicine Institute, Jefferson, Louisiana, USA.,Children's Health Andrews Institute for Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Plano, Texas, USA.,Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Investigation performed at Metrics of Osteochondral Allografts (MOCA), JRF Ortho, Centennial, Colorado, USA
| | - James E Fleischli
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.,Ochsner Sports Medicine Institute, Jefferson, Louisiana, USA.,Children's Health Andrews Institute for Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Plano, Texas, USA.,Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Investigation performed at Metrics of Osteochondral Allografts (MOCA), JRF Ortho, Centennial, Colorado, USA
| | - Alan Getgood
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.,Ochsner Sports Medicine Institute, Jefferson, Louisiana, USA.,Children's Health Andrews Institute for Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Plano, Texas, USA.,Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Investigation performed at Metrics of Osteochondral Allografts (MOCA), JRF Ortho, Centennial, Colorado, USA
| | - Andreas H Gomoll
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.,Ochsner Sports Medicine Institute, Jefferson, Louisiana, USA.,Children's Health Andrews Institute for Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Plano, Texas, USA.,Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Investigation performed at Metrics of Osteochondral Allografts (MOCA), JRF Ortho, Centennial, Colorado, USA
| | - Allan E Gross
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.,Ochsner Sports Medicine Institute, Jefferson, Louisiana, USA.,Children's Health Andrews Institute for Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Plano, Texas, USA.,Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Investigation performed at Metrics of Osteochondral Allografts (MOCA), JRF Ortho, Centennial, Colorado, USA
| | - Aaron J Krych
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.,Ochsner Sports Medicine Institute, Jefferson, Louisiana, USA.,Children's Health Andrews Institute for Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Plano, Texas, USA.,Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Investigation performed at Metrics of Osteochondral Allografts (MOCA), JRF Ortho, Centennial, Colorado, USA
| | - Christian Lattermann
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.,Ochsner Sports Medicine Institute, Jefferson, Louisiana, USA.,Children's Health Andrews Institute for Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Plano, Texas, USA.,Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Investigation performed at Metrics of Osteochondral Allografts (MOCA), JRF Ortho, Centennial, Colorado, USA
| | - Bert R Mandelbaum
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.,Ochsner Sports Medicine Institute, Jefferson, Louisiana, USA.,Children's Health Andrews Institute for Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Plano, Texas, USA.,Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Investigation performed at Metrics of Osteochondral Allografts (MOCA), JRF Ortho, Centennial, Colorado, USA
| | - Peter R Mandt
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.,Ochsner Sports Medicine Institute, Jefferson, Louisiana, USA.,Children's Health Andrews Institute for Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Plano, Texas, USA.,Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Investigation performed at Metrics of Osteochondral Allografts (MOCA), JRF Ortho, Centennial, Colorado, USA
| | - Raffy Mirzayan
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.,Ochsner Sports Medicine Institute, Jefferson, Louisiana, USA.,Children's Health Andrews Institute for Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Plano, Texas, USA.,Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Investigation performed at Metrics of Osteochondral Allografts (MOCA), JRF Ortho, Centennial, Colorado, USA
| | - Timothy S Mologne
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.,Ochsner Sports Medicine Institute, Jefferson, Louisiana, USA.,Children's Health Andrews Institute for Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Plano, Texas, USA.,Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Investigation performed at Metrics of Osteochondral Allografts (MOCA), JRF Ortho, Centennial, Colorado, USA
| | - Matthew T Provencher
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.,Ochsner Sports Medicine Institute, Jefferson, Louisiana, USA.,Children's Health Andrews Institute for Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Plano, Texas, USA.,Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Investigation performed at Metrics of Osteochondral Allografts (MOCA), JRF Ortho, Centennial, Colorado, USA
| | - Scott A Rodeo
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.,Ochsner Sports Medicine Institute, Jefferson, Louisiana, USA.,Children's Health Andrews Institute for Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Plano, Texas, USA.,Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Investigation performed at Metrics of Osteochondral Allografts (MOCA), JRF Ortho, Centennial, Colorado, USA
| | - Oleg Safir
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.,Ochsner Sports Medicine Institute, Jefferson, Louisiana, USA.,Children's Health Andrews Institute for Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Plano, Texas, USA.,Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Investigation performed at Metrics of Osteochondral Allografts (MOCA), JRF Ortho, Centennial, Colorado, USA
| | - Eric D Strauss
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.,Ochsner Sports Medicine Institute, Jefferson, Louisiana, USA.,Children's Health Andrews Institute for Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Plano, Texas, USA.,Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Investigation performed at Metrics of Osteochondral Allografts (MOCA), JRF Ortho, Centennial, Colorado, USA
| | - Christopher J Wahl
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.,Ochsner Sports Medicine Institute, Jefferson, Louisiana, USA.,Children's Health Andrews Institute for Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Plano, Texas, USA.,Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Investigation performed at Metrics of Osteochondral Allografts (MOCA), JRF Ortho, Centennial, Colorado, USA
| | - Riley J Williams
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.,Ochsner Sports Medicine Institute, Jefferson, Louisiana, USA.,Children's Health Andrews Institute for Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Plano, Texas, USA.,Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Investigation performed at Metrics of Osteochondral Allografts (MOCA), JRF Ortho, Centennial, Colorado, USA
| | - Adam B Yanke
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.,Ochsner Sports Medicine Institute, Jefferson, Louisiana, USA.,Children's Health Andrews Institute for Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Plano, Texas, USA.,Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Investigation performed at Metrics of Osteochondral Allografts (MOCA), JRF Ortho, Centennial, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Sánchez-Porras D, Durand-Herrera D, Paes AB, Chato-Astrain J, Verplancke R, Vanfleteren J, Sánchez-López JD, García-García ÓD, Campos F, Carriel V. Ex Vivo Generation and Characterization of Human Hyaline and Elastic Cartilaginous Microtissues for Tissue Engineering Applications. Biomedicines 2021; 9:biomedicines9030292. [PMID: 33809387 PMCID: PMC8001313 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines9030292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2021] [Revised: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Considering the high prevalence of cartilage-associated pathologies, low self-repair capacity and limitations of current repair techniques, tissue engineering (TE) strategies have emerged as a promising alternative in this field. Three-dimensional culture techniques have gained attention in recent years, showing their ability to provide the most biomimetic environment for the cells under culture conditions, enabling the cells to fabricate natural, 3D functional microtissues (MTs). In this sense, the aim of this study was to generate, characterize and compare scaffold-free human hyaline and elastic cartilage-derived MTs (HC-MTs and EC-MTs, respectively) under expansion (EM) and chondrogenic media (CM). MTs were generated by using agarose microchips and evaluated ex vivo for 28 days. The MTs generated were subjected to morphometric assessment and cell viability, metabolic activity and histological analyses. Results suggest that the use of CM improves the biomimicry of the MTs obtained in terms of morphology, viability and extracellular matrix (ECM) synthesis with respect to the use of EM. Moreover, the overall results indicate a faster and more sensitive response of the EC-derived cells to the use of CM as compared to HC chondrocytes. Finally, future preclinical in vivo studies are still needed to determine the potential clinical usefulness of these novel advanced therapy products.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Sánchez-Porras
- Department of Histology, Tissue Engineering Group, Faculty of Medicine, University of Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain; (D.S.-P.); (D.D.-H.)
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs. GRANADA, 18012 Granada, Spain; (J.C.-A.); (Ó.D.G.-G.)
- Doctoral Program in Biomedicine, Doctoral School, University of Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain
| | - Daniel Durand-Herrera
- Department of Histology, Tissue Engineering Group, Faculty of Medicine, University of Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain; (D.S.-P.); (D.D.-H.)
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs. GRANADA, 18012 Granada, Spain; (J.C.-A.); (Ó.D.G.-G.)
| | - Ana B. Paes
- Master Program in Tissue Engineering and Advanced Therapies, International School for Postgraduate Studies, University of Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain;
| | - Jesús Chato-Astrain
- Department of Histology, Tissue Engineering Group, Faculty of Medicine, University of Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain; (D.S.-P.); (D.D.-H.)
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs. GRANADA, 18012 Granada, Spain; (J.C.-A.); (Ó.D.G.-G.)
| | - Rik Verplancke
- Centre for Microsystems Technology (CMST), imec and Ghent University, 9052 Ghent, Belgium; (R.V.); (J.V.)
| | - Jan Vanfleteren
- Centre for Microsystems Technology (CMST), imec and Ghent University, 9052 Ghent, Belgium; (R.V.); (J.V.)
| | - José Darío Sánchez-López
- Division of Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Complex of Granada, 18013 Granada, Spain;
| | - Óscar Darío García-García
- Department of Histology, Tissue Engineering Group, Faculty of Medicine, University of Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain; (D.S.-P.); (D.D.-H.)
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs. GRANADA, 18012 Granada, Spain; (J.C.-A.); (Ó.D.G.-G.)
| | - Fernando Campos
- Department of Histology, Tissue Engineering Group, Faculty of Medicine, University of Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain; (D.S.-P.); (D.D.-H.)
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs. GRANADA, 18012 Granada, Spain; (J.C.-A.); (Ó.D.G.-G.)
- Correspondence: (F.C.); (V.C.); Tel.: +34-958-248-295 (V.C.)
| | - Víctor Carriel
- Department of Histology, Tissue Engineering Group, Faculty of Medicine, University of Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain; (D.S.-P.); (D.D.-H.)
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs. GRANADA, 18012 Granada, Spain; (J.C.-A.); (Ó.D.G.-G.)
- Correspondence: (F.C.); (V.C.); Tel.: +34-958-248-295 (V.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kon E, Di Matteo B, Verdonk P, Drobnic M, Dulic O, Gavrilovic G, Patrascu JM, Zaslav K, Kwiatkowski G, Altschuler N, Robinson D. Aragonite-Based Scaffold for the Treatment of Joint Surface Lesions in Mild to Moderate Osteoarthritic Knees: Results of a 2-Year Multicenter Prospective Study. Am J Sports Med 2021; 49:588-598. [PMID: 33481631 DOI: 10.1177/0363546520981750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Osteoarthritis (OA) is considered a contraindication to most cartilage repair techniques. Several regenerative approaches have been attempted with the aim of delaying or preventing joint replacement, with controversial results. Currently, there is a paucity of data on the use of single-step techniques, such as cell-free biomimetic scaffolds, for the treatment of joint surface lesions (JSLs) in OA knees. PURPOSE To present the 2-year follow-up clinical and radiological outcomes after implantation of a novel, cell-free aragonite-based scaffold for the treatment of JSLs in patients with mild to moderate knee OA in a multicenter prospective study. STUDY DESIGN Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS A total of 86 patients, 60 male and 26 female, with a mean age of 37.4 ± 10.0 years, mild to moderate knee OA, and a mean defect size of 3.0 ± 1.7 cm2, were recruited at 8 medical centers according to the following criteria: radiographic mild to moderate knee OA (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2 or 3); up to 3 treatable chondral/osteochondral defects (International Cartilage Repair Society grades 3 and 4) on the femoral condyles or trochlea; a total defect size ≤7 cm2; and no concurrent knee instability, severe axial malalignment, or systemic arthropathy. All patients were evaluated at baseline and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after implantation using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score. Additionally, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed to assess the amount of cartilage defect filling at the repaired site. RESULTS Significant improvement on all KOOS subscales was recorded from baseline (Pain: 49.6 ± 13.1; Activities of Daily Living [ADL]: 56.1 ± 18.4; Sport: 22.8 ± 18.8; Quality of Life [QoL]: 23.5 ± 16.5; Symptoms: 55.4 ± 19.9) to the 24 months' follow-up (Pain: 79.5 ± 21.1 [P < .001]; ADL: 84.1 ± 21.4 [P < .001]; Sport: 60.8 ± 31.9 [P < .001]; QoL: 54.9 ± 30.4 [P < .001]; Symptoms: 77.7 ± 21.2 [P < .001]). The IKDC subjective score showed a similar trend and improved from 37.8 ± 14.7 at baseline to 65.8 ± 23.5 at 24 months (P < .001). MRI showed a significant increase in defect filling over time: up to 78.7% ± 25.3% of surface coverage after 24 months. Treatment failure requiring revision surgery occurred in 8 patients (9.3%). CONCLUSION The use of an aragonite-based osteochondral scaffold in patients with JSLs and mild to moderate knee OA provided significant clinical improvement at the 24-month follow-up, as reported by the patients. These findings were associated with good cartilage defect filling, as observed on MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizaveta Kon
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.,Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Berardo Di Matteo
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.,Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,First Moscow State Medical University, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Peter Verdonk
- ORTHOCA, AZ Monica, Antwerp, Belgium.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Matej Drobnic
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ljubljana University Medical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Oliver Dulic
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Clinical Center of Vojvodina, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | | | - Jenel M Patrascu
- Spitalul Clinic Judeţean de Urgenţa±"Pius Brînzeu" Timişoara, Timişoara, Romania
| | - Ken Zaslav
- OrthoVirginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Grzegorz Kwiatkowski
- Department of Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy and Sports Trauma, District Hospital of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Piekary Slaskie, Poland
| | | | - Dror Robinson
- Orthopedic Research Unit and Foot and Ankle Service, Hasharon Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Calcei JG, Ray T, Sherman SL, Farr J. Management of Large Focal Chondral and Osteochondral Defects in the Knee. J Knee Surg 2020; 33:1187-1200. [PMID: 33260221 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1721053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Large, focal articular cartilage defects of the knee (> 4 cm2) can be a source of significant morbidity and often require surgical intervention. Patient- and lesion-specific factors must be identified when evaluating a patient with an articular cartilage defect. In the management of large cartilage defects, the two classically utilized cartilage restoration procedures are osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation and cell therapy, or autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI). Alternative techniques that are available or currently in clinical trials include a hyaluronan-based scaffold plus bone marrow aspirate concentrate, a third-generation autologous chondrocyte implant, and an aragonite-based scaffold. In this review, we will focus on OCA and ACI as the mainstay in management of large chondral and osteochondral defects of the knee. We will discuss the techniques and associated clinical outcomes for each, while including a brief mention of alternative treatments. Overall, cartilage restoration techniques have yielded favorable clinical outcomes and can be successfully employed to treat these challenging large focal lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob G Calcei
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Taylor Ray
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California
| | - Seth L Sherman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California
| | - Jack Farr
- Knee Preservation and Cartilage Restoration Center, OrthoIndy, Indianapolis, Indiana
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Schreiner AJ, Stoker AM, Bozynski CC, Kuroki K, Stannard JP, Cook JL. Clinical Application of the Basic Science of Articular Cartilage Pathology and Treatment. J Knee Surg 2020; 33:1056-1068. [PMID: 32583400 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1712944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The joint is an organ with each tissue playing critical roles in health and disease. Intact articular cartilage is an exquisite tissue that withstands incredible biologic and biomechanical demands in allowing movement and function, which is why hyaline cartilage must be maintained within a very narrow range of biochemical composition and morphologic architecture to meet demands while maintaining health and integrity. Unfortunately, insult, injury, and/or aging can initiate a cascade of events that result in erosion, degradation, and loss of articular cartilage such that joint pain and dysfunction ensue. Importantly, articular cartilage pathology affects the health of the entire joint and therefore should not be considered or addressed in isolation. Treating articular cartilage lesions is challenging because left alone, the tissue is incapable of regeneration or highly functional and durable repair. Nonoperative treatments can alleviate symptoms associated with cartilage pathology but are not curative or lasting. Current surgical treatments range from stimulation of intrinsic repair to whole-surface and whole-joint restoration. Unfortunately, there is a relative paucity of prospective, randomized controlled, or well-designed cohort-based clinical trials with respect to cartilage repair and restoration surgeries, such that there is a gap in knowledge that must be addressed to determine optimal treatment strategies for this ubiquitous problem in orthopedic health care. This review article discusses the basic science rationale and principles that influence pathology, symptoms, treatment algorithms, and outcomes associated with articular cartilage defects in the knee.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna J Schreiner
- Thompson Laboratory for Regenerative Orthopaedics, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.,BG Center for Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Aaron M Stoker
- Thompson Laboratory for Regenerative Orthopaedics, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | - Chantelle C Bozynski
- Thompson Laboratory for Regenerative Orthopaedics, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | - Keiichi Kuroki
- Thompson Laboratory for Regenerative Orthopaedics, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | - James P Stannard
- Thompson Laboratory for Regenerative Orthopaedics, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | - James L Cook
- Thompson Laboratory for Regenerative Orthopaedics, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Özdemir E, Emet A, Hashemihesar R, Yürüker ACS, Kılıç E, Uçkan Çetinkaya D, Turhan E. Articular Cartilage Regeneration Utilizing Decellularized Human Placental Scaffold, Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Platelet Rich Plasma. Tissue Eng Regen Med 2020; 17:901-908. [PMID: 33030679 DOI: 10.1007/s13770-020-00298-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Revised: 08/10/2020] [Accepted: 08/26/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Articular cartilage repair has been a challenge in orthopedic practice due to the limited self-regenerative capability. Optimal treatment method for cartilage defects has not been defined. We investigated the effect of decellularized human placental (DHP) scaffold, mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on hyaline cartilage regeneration in a rat model. METHODS An osteochondral defect was created in trochlea region of the femur in all groups, bilaterally. No additional procedure was performed in control group (n = 14). Only the DHP scaffold was applied to the P group (n = 14). The DHP scaffold and 1 × 106 MSCs were applied to the PS group (n = 14). The DHP scaffold and PRP were applied to the PP group (n = 14). The DHP scaffold, 1 × 106 MSCs and PRP were applied to the PSP group (n = 14). Outcome measures at 12 weeks included Pineda histology score and qualitative histology. RESULTS The mean Pineda scores of P, PS, PP, and PSP groups were significantly better than the control group (p = 0.031, p = 0.002, p < 0.001, p < 0001, respectively). There was no statistically difference in mean Pineda scores of P, PS, PP, and PSP groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION In conclusion, the DHP scaffold appears to be a promising scaffold on hyaline cartilage regeneration. The augmentation of DHP scaffold with MSCs and PRP combinations did not enhance its efficacy on articular cartilage regeneration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erdi Özdemir
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, 06230, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Abdülsamet Emet
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, 06230, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ramin Hashemihesar
- Department of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul Aydin University, 34295, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Emine Kılıç
- Center for Stem Cell Research and Development, Hacettepe University, 06100, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Duygu Uçkan Çetinkaya
- Center for Stem Cell Research and Development, Hacettepe University, 06100, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Egemen Turhan
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, 06230, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Chen L, Liu J, Guan M, Zhou T, Duan X, Xiang Z. Growth Factor and Its Polymer Scaffold-Based Delivery System for Cartilage Tissue Engineering. Int J Nanomedicine 2020; 15:6097-6111. [PMID: 32884266 PMCID: PMC7434569 DOI: 10.2147/ijn.s249829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2020] [Accepted: 07/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The development of biomaterials, stem cells and bioactive factors has led to cartilage tissue engineering becoming a promising tactic to repair cartilage defects. Various polymer three-dimensional scaffolds that provide an extracellular matrix (ECM) mimicking environment play an important role in promoting cartilage regeneration. In addition, numerous growth factors have been found in the regenerative process. However, it has been elucidated that the uncontrolled delivery of these factors cannot fully exert regenerative potential and can also elicit undesired side effects. Considering the complexity of the ECM, neither scaffolds nor growth factors can independently obtain successful outcomes in cartilage tissue engineering. Therefore, collectively, an appropriate combination of growth factors and scaffolds have great potential to promote cartilage repair effectively; this approach has become an area of considerable interest in recent investigations. Of late, an increasing trend was observed in cartilage tissue engineering towards this combination to develop a controlled delivery system that provides adequate physical support for neo-cartilage formation and also enables spatiotemporally delivery of growth factors to precisely and fully exert their chondrogenic potential. This review will discuss the role of polymer scaffolds and various growth factors involved in cartilage tissue engineering. Several growth factor delivery strategies based on the polymer scaffolds will also be discussed, with examples from recent studies highlighting the importance of spatiotemporal strategies for the controlled delivery of single or multiple growth factors in cartilage tissue engineering applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Chen
- Department of Orthopedics, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, People's Republic of China.,School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Jiaxin Liu
- Department of Orthopedics, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, People's Republic of China
| | - Ming Guan
- School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.,Department of Orthopedics, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, People's Republic of China
| | - Tongqing Zhou
- School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Xin Duan
- Department of Orthopedics, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhou Xiang
- Department of Orthopedics, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Everhart JS, Campbell AB, Abouljoud MM, Kirven JC, Flanigan DC. Cost-efficacy of Knee Cartilage Defect Treatments in the United States. Am J Sports Med 2020; 48:242-251. [PMID: 31038980 DOI: 10.1177/0363546519834557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple knee cartilage defect treatments are available in the United States, although the cost-efficacy of these therapies in various clinical scenarios is not well understood. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS The purpose was to determine cost-efficacy of cartilage therapies in the United States with available mid- or long-term outcomes data. The authors hypothesized that cartilage treatment strategies currently approved for commercial use in the United States will be cost-effective, as defined by a cost <$50,000 per quality-adjusted life-year over 10 years. STUDY DESIGN Systematic review. METHODS A systematic search was performed for prospective cartilage treatment outcome studies of therapies commercially available in the United States with minimum 5-year follow-up and report of pre- and posttreatment International Knee Documentation Committee subjective scores. Cost-efficacy over 10 years was determined with Markov modeling and consideration of early reoperation or revision surgery for treatment failure. RESULTS Twenty-two studies were included, with available outcomes data on microfracture, osteochondral autograft, osteochondral allograft (OCA), autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI), and matrix-induced ACI. Mean improvement in International Knee Documentation Committee subjective scores at final follow-up ranged from 17.7 for microfracture of defects >3 cm2 to 36.0 for OCA of bipolar lesions. Failure rates ranged from <5% for osteochondral autograft for defects requiring 1 or 2 plugs to 46% for OCA of bipolar defects. All treatments were cost-effective over 10 years in the baseline model if costs were increased 50% or if failure rates were increased an additional 15%. However, if efficacy was decreased by a minimum clinically important amount, then ACI (periosteal cover) of femoral condylar lesions ($51,379 per quality-adjusted life-year), OCA of bipolar lesions ($66,255) or the patella ($66,975), and microfracture of defects >3 cm2 ($127,782) became cost-ineffective over 10 years. CONCLUSION Currently employed treatments for knee cartilage defects in the United States are cost-effective in most clinically acceptable applications. Microfracture is not a cost-effective initial treatment of defects >3 cm2. OCA transplantation of the patella or bipolar lesions is potentially cost-ineffective and should be used judiciously.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua S Everhart
- Division of Sports Medicine Cartilage Repair Center, Department of Orthopaedics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Andrew B Campbell
- Division of Sports Medicine Cartilage Repair Center, Department of Orthopaedics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Moneer M Abouljoud
- Division of Sports Medicine Cartilage Repair Center, Department of Orthopaedics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - J Caid Kirven
- Division of Sports Medicine Cartilage Repair Center, Department of Orthopaedics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - David C Flanigan
- Division of Sports Medicine Cartilage Repair Center, Department of Orthopaedics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ogura T, Bryant T, Merkely G, Mosier BA, Minas T. Survival Analysis of Revision Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation for Failed ACI. Am J Sports Med 2019; 47:3212-3220. [PMID: 31589471 DOI: 10.1177/0363546519876630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) provides a successful outcome for treating articular cartilage lesions. However, there have been very few reports on the clinical outcomes of revision ACI for failed ACI. PURPOSE To evaluate clinical outcomes in patients who underwent revision ACI of the knee for failure of an initial ACI and to determine the factors affecting the survival rate. STUDY DESIGN Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS A review of a prospectively collected data set was performed from patients who underwent revision ACI of the knee for failure of an initial ACI between 1995 and 2014 by a single surgeon. The authors evaluated 53 patients (53 knees; mean age, 38 years) over a mean 11.2-year follow-up (range, 2-20). A total of 62 cartilage lesions were treated for failed graft lesions after an initial ACI, and 31 new cartilage lesions were treated at revision ACI, as there was progression of disease. Overall, 93 cartilage lesions (mean, 1.8 lesions per knee) with a total surface area of 7.4 cm2 (range, 2.5-18 cm2) per knee were treated at revision ACI. Survival analysis was performed with the Kaplan-Meier method, with ACI graft failure or conversion to a prosthetic arthroplasty as the endpoint. The modified Cincinnati Knee Rating Scale, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, visual analog scale, and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey were used to evaluate clinical outcomes. Patients also self-reported knee function and satisfaction. Standard radiographs were evaluated with Kellgren-Lawrence grades. RESULTS Survival rates were 71% and 53% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Survival subanalysis revealed a trend that patients without previous cartilage repair procedures before an initial ACI had better survival rates than those with such procedures (81% vs 62% at 5 years, 64% vs 42% at 10 years, P = .0958). Patients with retained grafts showed significant improvement in pain and function, with a high level of satisfaction. At a mean 5.1 years postoperatively, 18 of 27 successful knees were radiographically assessed with no significant osteoarthritis progression. Outcomes for 26 patients were considered failures (mean, 4.9 years postoperatively), in which 15 patients had prosthetic arthroplasty (mean, 4.6 years) and the other 11 patients had revision cartilage repair (mean, 5.4 years) and thus could maintain their native knees. CONCLUSION Results of revision ACI for patients who failed ACI showed acceptable clinical outcomes. Revision ACI may be an option for young patients after failed initial ACI, particularly patients without previous cartilage repair procedures and those who desire to maintain their native knees.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takahiro Ogura
- Cartilage Repair Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Sports Medicine Center, Funabashi Orthopaedic Hospital, Funabashi, Japan
| | - Tim Bryant
- Cartilage Repair Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Cartilage Repair Center, Paley Orthopedic and Spine Institute, St Mary's Hospital, West Palm Beach, Florida, USA
| | - Gergo Merkely
- Cartilage Repair Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Traumatology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Brian A Mosier
- Cartilage Repair Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Allegheny Health Network, Monroeville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Tom Minas
- Cartilage Repair Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Cartilage Repair Center, Paley Orthopedic and Spine Institute, St Mary's Hospital, West Palm Beach, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Effectiveness of Adhering Adipose-Derived Stem Cells to Defective Cartilage in Promoting Cartilage Regeneration in a Rabbit Model. Arthroscopy 2019; 35:2619-2626. [PMID: 31307837 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.03.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2018] [Revised: 02/28/2019] [Accepted: 03/04/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the therapeutic effect of using a local adherent technique to transplant adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) for cartilage regeneration in a rabbit model for patients with traumatic damage or osteochondritis dissecans. METHODS Cartilage defects were created in the trochlear groove of 60 adult white rabbit knees. The rabbits were either left untreated (control group), treated with intra-articularly injected ADSCs (injected group), or treated by adhering ADSCs (adherent group). The 3 groups were compared at 4, 12, and 24 weeks postoperatively using the International Cartilage Repair Society macroscopic scoring system and a modified Wakitani histologic grading system to quantitatively evaluate the regenerated cartilage. The degree of defect repair, integration to the border zone, macroscopic appearance, cell morphology, matrix staining, surface regularity, cartilage thickness, and integration of the donor with the host were evaluated. RESULTS The mean International Cartilage Repair Society scores in the control, injected, and adherent groups were 6.4 ± 2.9, 7.6 ± 0.8, and 7.6 ± 1.4, respectively, at 4 weeks; 6.2 ± 2.4, 8.2 ± 1.5, and 9.6 ± 1.0, respectively, at 8 weeks; and 7.6 ± 1.0, 8.4 ± 1.4, and 10.2 ± 1.7, respectively, at 24 weeks. Although the scores were higher in the adherent group, no significant difference was noted. The mean modified Wakitani scores in the control, injected, and adherent groups were 3.8 ± 2.0, 5.1 ± 1.8, and 7.8 ± 1.3, respectively, at 4 weeks (P = .041); 5.1 ± 1.0, 5.4 ± 2.7, and 9.6 ± 1.4, respectively, at 12 weeks (P = .016); and 5.4 ± 1.0, 5.9 ± 1.5, and 9.8 ± 1.8, respectively, at 24 weeks (P = .007). CONCLUSIONS The histologic modified Wakitani scores showed that adhering ADSCs to osteochondral cartilage defects was more effective than intra-articular injection for promoting cartilage regeneration. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Local adhesion of ADSCs can promote cartilage regeneration and may be a treatment option for cartilage repair.
Collapse
|
31
|
Zhang G, Nie M, Webster TJ, Zhang Q, Fan W. Ectopic chondrogenesis of nude mouse induced by nano gene delivery enhanced tissue engineering technology. Int J Nanomedicine 2019; 14:4755-4765. [PMID: 31308656 PMCID: PMC6613371 DOI: 10.2147/ijn.s199306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2018] [Accepted: 05/06/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Many techniques and methods have been used clinically to relieve pain from cartilage repair, but the long-term effect is still unsatisfactory. Purpose: The objective of this study was to form an artificial chondroid tissue gene enhanced tissue engineering system to repair cartilage defects via nanosized liposomes. Methods: Cationic nanosized liposomes were prepared and characterized using transmission electron microscope (TEM) and dynamic laser light scattering (DLS). The rat mesenchymal stem cells (rMSCs) were isolated, cultivated, and induced by SRY (Sex-Determining Region Y)-Box 9 (Sox9) via cationic nanosized liposomes. The induced rMSCs were mixed with a thermo-sensitive chitosan hydrogel and subcutaneously injected into the nude mice. Finally, the newly-formed chondroid tissue obtained in the injection parts, and the transparent parts were detected by HE, collagen II, and safranin O. Results: It was found that the presently prepared cationic nanosized liposomes had the diameter of 85.76±3.48 nm and the zeta potential of 15.76±2.1 mV. The isolated rMSCs proliferation was fibroblast-like, with a cultivated confluence of 90% confluence in 5-8 days, and stained positive for CD29 and CD44 while negative for CD34 and CD45. After transfection with cationic nanosized liposomes, we observed changes of cellular morphology and a higher expression of SOX9 compared with control groups, which indicated that rMSCs could differentiate into chondrocyte in vitro. By mixing transfected rMSCs with the thermo-sensitive hydrogel of chitosan in nude mice, chondroid tissue was successfully obtained, demonstrating that rMSCs can differentiate into chondrogenic cells in vivo. Conclusion: This study explored new ways to improve the quality of tissue engineered cartilage, thus accelerating clinical transformation and reducing patient pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guangcheng Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China
| | - Mingjun Nie
- Department of Orthopedics, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, People's Republic of China
| | - Thomas J Webster
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Qing Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, People's Republic of China
| | - Weimin Fan
- Department of Orthopedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
The cost-effectiveness of osteochondral allograft transplantation in the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2019; 27:1739-1753. [PMID: 30721344 PMCID: PMC6541582 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-019-05392-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2018] [Accepted: 01/30/2019] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Osteochondral allografts (OCA) consist of a layer of hyaline cartilage and a layer of underlying bone. They are used to repair combined defects of articular cartilage and bone. Such defects often occur in people far too young to have knee arthroplasty, for whom the main alternative to OCA is conservative symptomatic care, which will not prevent development of osteoarthritis. The aim of this report was to assess the cost-effectiveness of osteochondral allograft transplantation in the knee. METHODS Systematic review of evidence on clinical effectiveness and economic modelling. RESULTS The evidence on osteochondral allograft transplantation comes from observational studies, but often based on good quality prospective registries of all patients having such surgery. Without controlled trials, it was necessary to use historical cohorts to assess the effect of osteochondral grafts. There is good evidence that OCA are clinically effective with a high graft survival rate over 20 years. If an OCA graft fails, there is some evidence that revision with a second OCA is also effective, though less so than primary OCA. Economic modelling showed that osteochondral allograft transplantation was highly cost-effective, with costs per quality adjusted life year much lower than many other treatments considered cost effective. CONCLUSIONS Osteochondral allograft transplantation appears highly cost-effective though the cost per quality adjusted life year varies according to the widely varying costs of allografts. Based on one small study, revision OCA also appears very cost-effective, but more evidence is needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II.
Collapse
|
33
|
Duchman KR, Wolf BR. Editorial Commentary: Trends in Cartilage Surgery-Who Is Steering the Ship? Arthroscopy 2019; 35:179-181. [PMID: 30611348 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2018] [Accepted: 10/08/2018] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
With myriad cartilage surgery techniques available, including marrow stimulation, autologous osteochondral transfer, osteochondral allograft transplantation, and autologous chondrocyte implantation, treatment of knee articular cartilage injuries has become increasingly complex. Recent evidence suggests that advanced cartilage restoration procedures may provide improved outcomes and durability when compared with marrow stimulation techniques. When investigating orthopaedic surgeons early in practice, it appears that utilization of marrow stimulation techniques has decreased, an encouraging trend that is in line with recent evidence. However, it is important to consider how other factors not investigated, including insurance approval and payor reimbursement, may influence these trends moving forward.
Collapse
|
34
|
Westermann RW. Editorial Commentary: When Performing Cartilage Restoration, Please Don't Put Down the Osteotomy Saw! Arthroscopy 2019; 35:147-148. [PMID: 30611342 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.09.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2018] [Accepted: 09/25/2018] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Cartilage restoration procedures appear to be increasing in popularity and are being performed more frequently for older patients according to a recent analysis of database data. Chondroplasty and microfracture are most commonly performed; however, chondrocyte transfer procedures, including osteochondral autologous transplantation and autologous chondrocyte implantation, are being performed more commonly. Relatively few corrective osteotomies are being performed in conjunction with these procedures; this is concerning because surgeons are either not looking for malalignment or not correcting it. Please, when performing joint preservation surgery, don't put down the saw!
Collapse
|
35
|
D'Ambrosi R, Ragone V, Ursino N. What future in the treatment of osteochondral knee defects? ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2018; 6:S100. [PMID: 30740421 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2018.11.28] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Nicola Ursino
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, U.O. C.A.S.C.O, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
Hyaline articular cartilage is critical for the normal functioning of the knee joint. Untreated focal cartilage defects have the potential to rapidly progress to diffuse osteoarthritis. Over the last several decades, a variety of interventions aiming at preserving articular cartilage and preventing osteoarthritis have been investigated. Reparative cartilage procedures, such as microfracture, penetrate the subchondral bone plate in effort to fill focal cartilage defects with marrow elements and stimulate fibrocartilaginous repair. In contrast, restorative cartilage procedures aim to replace the defective articular surface with autologous or allogeneic hyaline cartilage. This review focuses on the preservation of articular cartilage, and discusses the current reparative and restorative surgical techniques available for treating focal cartilage defects.
Collapse
|
37
|
Repair of Damaged Articular Cartilage: Current Approaches and Future Directions. Int J Mol Sci 2018; 19:ijms19082366. [PMID: 30103493 PMCID: PMC6122081 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19082366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 140] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2018] [Revised: 08/07/2018] [Accepted: 08/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Articular hyaline cartilage is extensively hydrated, but it is neither innervated nor vascularized, and its low cell density allows only extremely limited self-renewal. Most clinical and research efforts currently focus on the restoration of cartilage damaged in connection with osteoarthritis or trauma. Here, we discuss current clinical approaches for repairing cartilage, as well as research approaches which are currently developing, and those under translation into clinical practice. We also describe potential future directions in this area, including tissue engineering based on scaffolding and/or stem cells as well as a combination of gene and cell therapy. Particular focus is placed on cell-based approaches and the potential of recently characterized chondro-progenitors; progress with induced pluripotent stem cells is also discussed. In this context, we also consider the ability of different types of stem cell to restore hyaline cartilage and the importance of mimicking the environment in vivo during cell expansion and differentiation into mature chondrocytes.
Collapse
|
38
|
Karchner JP, Querido W, Kandel S, Pleshko N. Spatial correlation of native and engineered cartilage components at micron resolution. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2018; 1442:104-117. [PMID: 30058180 DOI: 10.1111/nyas.13934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2018] [Revised: 06/20/2018] [Accepted: 06/27/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Tissue engineering (TE) approaches are being widely investigated for repair of focal defects in articular cartilage. However, the amount and/or type of extracellular matrix (ECM) produced in engineered constructs does not always correlate with the resultant mechanical properties. This could be related to the specifics of ECM distribution throughout the construct. Here, we present data on the amount and distribution of the primary components of native and engineered cartilage (i.e., collagen, proteoglycan (PG), and water) using Fourier transform infrared imaging spectroscopy (FT-IRIS). These data permit visualization of matrix and water at 25 μm resolution throughout the tissues, and subsequent colocalization of these components using image processing methods. Native and engineered cartilage were cryosectioned at 80 μm for evaluation by FT-IRIS in the mid-infrared (MIR) and near-infrared (NIR) regions. PG distribution correlated strongly with water in native and engineered cartilage, supporting the binding of water to PG in both tissues. In addition, NIR-derived matrix peaks correlated significantly with MIR-derived collagen peaks, confirming the interpretation that these absorbances arise primarily from collagen and not PG. The combined use of MIR and NIR permits assessment of ECM and water spatial distribution at the micron level, which may aid in improved development of TE techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James P Karchner
- Department of Bioengineering, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - William Querido
- Department of Bioengineering, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Shital Kandel
- Department of Bioengineering, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Nancy Pleshko
- Department of Bioengineering, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|