Evaluation of the Responsiveness of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI) Scale

Isolated Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis for Ongoing Instability Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction with an Intact Graft is Effective and Has Low Surgical Morbidity

The management of persisting instability following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) includes isolated lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LEAT). The present study investigates the outcomes following isolated LEAT to address ongoing instability following ACLR without LEAT. Patients with ongoing symptomatic instability following ACLR with a radiologically intact and well-positioned graft who underwent an isolated LEAT between January 2017 and March 2022 were retrospectively recruited. Patients completed patient-reported outcome measures at baseline and mean 26 months postoperatively. Twelve knees in 11 patients underwent an isolated LEAT. All Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score domains improved significantly between pre- and postoperative measurements (pain 60.9-91.7, p = 0.002; symptoms 62.5-93.8, p = 0.003; activities of daily living 64.3-95.2, p = 0.002; sport 61.9-82.5, p = 0.012; quality of life 17.2-80.2, p = 0.002). One patient required revision ACL surgery 19 months following their subsequent LEAT procedure. An isolated LEAT demonstrated clinically significant improvements in patient function and activity with acceptable surgical morbidity and should be considered as an option for appropriate cases with instability despite an intact ACL graft. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:  Level IV prospective case series.

Return to sport at the pre-injury level following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is influenced by patients' perceived knee status and psychological readiness, and does not correlate with functional ability

OBJECTIVES

The purposes of this study were to (1) prospectively evaluate clinical and functional outcomes of athletes following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction up to 12 months after surgery, (2) to identify the correlations between functional and subjective tests, and (3) to determine which factors influence patients' capability to resume sports at pre-injury level.

METHODS

Patients who underwent ACL reconstruction using doubled autologous hamstring graft were prospectively assessed pre-operatively, 6, and 12 months after surgery using International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form, Tegner activity level, and ACL-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) scale. Jumping ability was instrumentally assessed using a test battery including bipodalic squat jump (SJ), bipodalic countermovement jump (CMJ), monopodalic CMJ, and monopodalic side-hop test.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients were available for clinical evaluation at 12-months follow-up. Average age was 34.0 years (SD 11.5, range 19-50). Male/female ratio was 31:2. Mean overall IKDC, and ACL-RSI scores increased from 52.5 to 47.1 preoperatively, to 89.9 (SD: 12.2, range 36.8-100) and 81.3 (SD 21.7, range 10-98.3), respectively at last follow-up (p ​< ​0.001). Monopodalic jump tests showed improvements at 12-month evaluation compared to 6-month follow-up (p ​< ​0.01). No statistically significant correlation was reported for ACL-RSI and jump limb symmetry index (LSI) (p ​= ​0.08 vs. CMJ; p ​= ​0.07 vs. side-hop test). No differences were observed in terms of jump LSI between patients who returned to pre-injury activity level and those who did not (p ​= ​0.11 for CMJ, p ​= ​0.09 for side-hop test). A significantly higher IKDC score at 6 months was observed in patients who did not return to pre-injury levels (p ​= ​0.009). Patients who did not return to pre-injury activity reported lower ACL-RSI scores at 12-months follow-up (p ​= ​0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

One year after ACL reconstruction, an improvement in jumping ability was observed, while a persistence of lower limbs asymmetries when performing jump tests was noted at 6-months follow-up. The ability to perform vertical jumps was not influenced by psychological outcomes 12 months following surgery. Higher values of subjective knee score and psychological readiness weakly correlated to return to sport at preinjury level, while no correlation was reported concerning jumping performance.

Association Between Autograft Choice and Psychological Readiness to Return to Sport After ACL Reconstruction

Background

It has been demonstrated that an athlete's psychological readiness contributes to one's ability to successfully return to sport (RTS) after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, the effect of graft choice on psychological readiness is not yet understood.

Purpose/Hypothesis

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between graft choice and an athlete's psychological readiness to RTS. It was hypothesized that similar ACL-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) scores would be achieved among patients who underwent ACL reconstruction with quadriceps autograft (QA), hamstring tendon autograft (HA), and bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) autograft.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

Patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction at a single institution between January 2017 and December 2018 were placed into separate cohorts depending on graft type (HA, BTB, or QA; n = 30 patients in each group), and the ACL-RSI, International Knee Documentation Committee subjective form, and Lysholm scores were compared between the different graft cohorts at 6 months postoperatively, at RTS, and at 2 years postoperatively. Also, the rate of patients who achieved an ACL-RSI score of ≥65 (predictive of return to preinjury sport at 2 years postoperatively) was calculated, as was the RTS rate and time.

Results

The QA group demonstrated significantly higher ACL-RSI scores than both the HA and BTB groups at 6 months postoperatively (P < .0001) and RTS (P = .011). The QA group also had a higher rate of achieving ≥65 on ACL-RSI than the other groups at 6 months postoperatively (P = .002) and RTS (P = .024). There was no significant difference in the RTS rate between the 3 groups, although the QA group demonstrated a significantly quicker return (QA, 8.1 months; BTB, 9.6 months; HA, 10.5 months; P < .001).

Conclusion

Athletes undergoing primary ACL reconstruction with QA achieved a higher mean ACL-RSI score and more often achieved a score of ≥65 at the 6-month and RTS time points compared with the HA and BTB groups. QA may afford an advantage over other grafts in terms of improved psychological readiness to RTS.

Males have higher psychological readiness to return to sports than females after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

To examine sex differences in psychological readiness to return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction as well as to determine whether males and females separately fulfilled cut-off values (≥65) of psychological readiness necessary to return to sport.

Information sources

Web of Science, Scopus and PubMed were comprehensively searched from inception to January 2024 to identify relevant studies.

Eligibility criteria

Observational investigations that compared males and females with a history of ACL reconstruction concerning psychological readiness to return to sport.

Risk of bias

Studies were rated using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomised Studies.

Included studies

Only 11 reports fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included in the quantitative analysis. A total of 2618 participants were subjected to the primary ACL reconstruction, out of 1631 males and 987 females. Psychological readiness to return to sport was evaluated approximately 9±2.9 months following surgery.

Synthesis of results

The main findings demonstrated that males had slightly higher psychological readiness to return to the sport than females (standardised mean difference 0.33; 95% CI 0.14 to 0.52; p=0.0007; I2=77%) after ACL surgery. In addition, the mean psychological readiness to return to the sport of males was 70.1±8.8 points and of females 65.1±8.8 points, indicating that both sexes exceeded recommendations necessary to return to sport.

Conclusion

Males had slightly higher psychological readiness to return to sport than females approximately 9±2.9 months after ACL reconstruction and both sexes exceeded the highlighted recommendations necessary to return to sport.

PROSPERO registration number

CRD42024497769: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024497769.

An 8-week physiotherapist-led return to sport group program after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction improves measures of physical and psychological function: A case series

BACKGROUND

Low return to competitive sport, high reinjury rates and long-term functional impairment of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) present significant challenges for patients. A program that facilitates a safe return to sport (RTS) following ACLR could potentially improve outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Case Series.

METHODS

Sixty participants (median 20-years-old (13-36), 43 males, 18 females, median 7.5 months (4-25) post-ACLR) completed an eight-week exercise program. A battery of physical tests and patient-reported outcome measures were assessed pre and post-program. The number of participants passing RTS criteria was evaluated, and RTS rates were determined. The correlation between the ACL-RSI and measures of physical function was explored.

RESULTS

Improvements in all isometric strength, hop tests, running T-test, and patient reported outcome measures were seen post-program. Five (8%) participants successfully passed all RTS criteria and eighty-five percent of participants returned to their previous level of sport. The ACL-RSI and the IKDC showed correlation across all time points (pre rs = 0.49; post rs = 0.40; change r = 0.40).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated improvements in all RTS criteria tests upon completing the 8-week rehabilitation program; however, few participants (8%) passed all RTS criteria. Psychological readiness is more closely related to patient-reported function than functional tests.

Translation and cross-cultural adaptation to Spanish of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport after Injury Scale (SP ACL‑RSI): Measurement properties and responsiveness in a multisport sample

Purpose

The aim was to translate and adapt The Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport after Injury Scale (ACL-RSI) to Spanish and provide evidence of its psychometric properties and responsiveness in a both sexes multisport sample.

Methods

ACL-RSI Spanish version (SP ACL-RSI) was obtained by forward-back-translation method. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct validity and responsiveness were assessed. Standardized response mean (SRM), smallest detectable change (SDC) and minimally important change (MIC) were obtained by anchor-based method. The sample consisted of n = 132 multisport patients who underwent ACL-RSI. Sixty-seven patients (Group A) completed test-retest of the SP ACL-RSI within 15 days and 65 patients (Group B) fulfilled SP ACL-RSI, the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK-11), the International Knee Documentation Committee-Subjective Knee Form (IKDC-SF 2000), the Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) preoperative, 6 and 12 months.

Results

The SP ACL-RSI shows satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.95) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.92), with acceptable floor (9%) and ceiling (6%) effects. Convergent validity was supported with moderate positive correlations with KOOS and IKDC-SF 2000 dimensions, and a negative correlation with the TSK (p < 0.001). For SDC responsiveness, a high effect was observed with SRM = 0.97 at 12 months, and the MIC for SP ACL-RSI was 15.

Conclusions

The SP ACL-RSI is as valid and reliable as the original for measuring emotions, confidence in performance, and re-injury risk on return to sport after ACL-R in Spanish-speaking multisport practitioners of both sexes. Moreover, it shows acceptable responsiveness, performing better at the group level than the individual level.

Level of evidence

A cohort study (diagnosis); Level II of evidence.

Correlation between Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury Score at 6 Months after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Mid-Term Functional Test Results: An Observational Study at 5-Year Follow-Up

Background/Objectives: Evaluations allowing patients to return to sport (RTS) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) should be multimodal, including a psychological evaluation. The goal of this study was to determine if there is a correlation between the ACL-return to sport after injury (ACL-RSI) score at 6 months post-ACLR and mid-term functional results. Methods: A total of 498 patients were assessed 6 months after primary ACLR using a composite test including isokinetics, hops, and ACL-RSI. A minimum of 3 years of follow-up was necessary. At the last follow-up, each patient completed clinical and functional evaluations, including the subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Tegner Activity Scale, Self Knee Value (SKV), and ACL-RSI score. The results were compared overall and item by item. Results: At the last follow-up, the mean SKV, Tegner, IKDC, and ACL-RSI scores were 86.8 ± 14.3%, 6 ± 2.1, 77 ± 11.9%, and 68.8 ± 25.7%, respectively. A significant correlation existed between the 6-month ACL-RSI score and each functional test (respectively, ρ = 0.189 p < 0.001; ρ = 0.174 p < 0.001; ρ = 0.237 p < 0.001). The ACL-RSI score was significantly higher than at 6 months after surgery (p < 0.001). Over half (59.2%) of the cohort returned to an equal or greater level of activity, and there was a significant correlation between the 6-month ACL-RSI score and post-surgery level of activity. Conclusions: Patients with better ACL-RSI scores at 6 months post-ACLR have better functional results in the medium term and are more likely to RTS. Our results show a correlation between psychological factors at 6 months, measured through the ACL-RSI score, and activity level at mid-term follow-up. This study underlines the relationship between RTS and psychological effects, and the importance of ACLR rehabilitation to focus on decreasing apprehension and fear.

Are Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries Validated for Spanish Language and Culture?

Background

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been adopted as a way to measure patient self-rated physical function and health status for patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. Although multiple PROMs exist and have been translated into various languages, the cross-cultural adaptation and validity of these PROMs for Spanish-speaking patients is unknown.

Purpose

To evaluate the adaptation quality and psychometric properties of Spanish-language adaptations of PROMs for patients with ACL injuries.

Study Design

Scoping review; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

Under PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, we reviewed published studies related to adaptation quality and psychometric properties of Spanish PROMs in patients with ACL injuries. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Reported Measures, the Quality Criteria for Psychometric Properties of Health Status Questionnaires, and the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. The level of evidence for each PROM was determined based on the number of studies, methodological quality, consistency of results, and sample size.

Results

The initial search strategy identified 5687 articles. After removal of duplicates, 1882 titles were screened, and 114 articles were assessed for eligibility. Six articles were selected for final review, comprising 4 PROMs: the Lysholm knee score, the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI), the Lower Extremity Functional Scale, and the Lower Limb Functional Index. Three studies followed all 6 processes for cross-cultural adaptation. None of the studies demonstrated all 14 domains required for cross-cultural validity (eg, description of translator expertise). The ACL-RSI achieved the highest level of evidence, with 3 of 9 domains demonstrating moderate evidence.

Conclusion

This review identified 4 instruments that have been translated for Spanish-speaking patients with ACL injuries, none of which demonstrated appropriate adaptation or robust psychometric properties. The study highlights the need for improvement in PROMs for Spanish-speaking patients and the potential for mismeasurement and inappropriate application of PROM results in patients with ACL injuries.

Reliability and responsiveness of the Swedish short Hip-RSI

Purpose

The aim of this study was to examine test-retest reliability and responsiveness of the short version (6-item) Hip Return to Sport after Injury (Hip-RSI) scale in patients following hip arthroscopy.

Methods

The study included 100 hip arthroscopy patients responding to a digital survey including the short version (6-item) Hip-RSI, International Hip Outcome Tool (short version) (iHOT-12) and RTS status 3, 6 and 9 months following surgery. The Hip-RSI was administered twice at 3-month follow-up. Test-retest reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients. Responsiveness was tested by correlations between changes in Hip-RSI and iHOT-12 scores and by comparing change in Hip-RSI scores of patients who progressed on the return to sport (RTS) continuum (from return to any sport to return to performance) to patients who did not, using independent samples t-tests.

Results

Hip-RSI was found to have excellent test-retest reliability on the individual (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC [95% confidence interval, CI]: 0.90 [0.83-0.94]) and group level (ICC [95% CI]: 0.95 [0.91-0.97]) with a standard error of measurement of 5.53 and smallest detectable change of 15.3 on the individual and 2.2 on the group level. Hip-RSI was found responsive to change through positive correlations of changes in scores with changes in iHOT-12 scores from 3 to 6 months (r [95% CI]: 0.51 [0.35-0.65]; p < 0.001) and from 3 to 9 months following arthroscopy (r [95% CI]: 0.61 [0.57-0.79); p < 0.001). Further responsiveness was shown by significant mean changes in scores among patients that progressed on the RTS-continuum (3-6 months: 8.6 [95% CI: 3.8- 13.5); 3-9 months: 12.6 [5.6-19.7]).

Conclusion

The short version (6-item) Hip-RSI demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability and responsiveness to change in the evaluation of psychological readiness to RTS following hip arthroscopy.

Level of Evidence

Level II.

Anterior cruciate ligament-Return to sport after injury scale brief version after ACL reconstruction: Persian translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to analyze the short anterior cruciate ligament return to sport after injury (ACL-RSI) (Persian) version's cultural adaption and validity.

METHODS

To assess test-retest reliability, 102 participants were filled out the short ACL-RSI(Per) scale 6 months or more after ACLR surgery. Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients), construct validity (Pearson's r) and sensitivity (floor/ceiling effect) were determined. In addition, patient completed other relevant measures such as Lysholm scores, the hospital for special surgery ACL satisfaction survey (HSS ACL-SS), the visual analogue scale (VAS) of pain and patient's satisfaction, the Tegner activity score (TAS), the single assessment numeric evaluation (SANE) and the Cincinnati Knee Rating System (CKRS).

RESULTS

The short ACL-RSI(Per) scale showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.91) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.923). Significant correlations between short ACL-RSI(Per) and other scales supported validity. There was a statistically significant connection between the short ACL-RSI(Per) and the following outcomes: HSS ACL-SS (r = 0.698, p < 0.001), VAS pain (r = 0.356, p < 0.001), CKRS (r = 0.644, p < 0.001), TAS (r = 0414, p < 0.001), Lysholm score (r = 0.467, p < 0.001) and SANE score (r = 0.536; p < 0.001). In addition to a satisfactory ceiling impact (15%), a sizeable floor effect (16.7%) was also seen.

CONCLUSION

The short ACL-RSI(Per) scale is a reliable and valid tool for assessing psychological readiness for return to sport after ACL reconstruction in Persian.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Psychological Readiness Is Weakly Related to Physical Function Tests at Return to Sport for Men and Not at All for Women Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Rehabilitation

PURPOSE

To assess the relationships between physical function tests of the operative limb and psychological readiness to return to sport (RTS) after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (return to sport after injury [ACL-RSI]) by sex. The secondary purpose was to quantify sex-specific differences in physical function test outcomes.

METHODS

Patient records were retrospectively identified as cases who performed RTS physical function testing (strength, horizontal hops, vertical jumps, single-leg leg press, and drop landing knee excursion, etc.), and completed a 6-question ACL-RSI survey at the time point they were cleared to RTS. Independent t-tests compared all variables between sex at P ≤ .05. Correlations and regression models were produced per sex to identify factors related to operative limb physical function tests and ACL-RSI scores.

RESULTS

With a total of 127 patients (63 men; 64 women), there was no difference in ACL-RSI scores and leg press repetitions between sex (P = .32 and P = .12, respectively). There were sex differences for all other physical performance outcomes (P < .001 for all). To estimate readiness using physical function test scores, the men's regression model identified knee excursion (β = 0.345; P = .033) as the only contributor to ACL-RSI (R2 = 0.089), whereas there was no relationship between physical performance outcomes and ACL-RSI in women (R2 = 0.00, P = 1.00).

CONCLUSIONS

Men and women reported similar ACL-RSI scales, indicating high readiness to return to sport. Likely due to sex-related physiological differences, men performed better at most physical function tests. Further, male ACL-RSI could be predicted using only one physical function outcome and 91% variability of the ACL-RSI coming from other contributors not evaluated, as indicated by R2. No physical function variables predict ACL-RSI in women. The evaluated variables are considered the primary indicators relevant for patients to be permitted to RTS yet cannot adequately predict psychological readiness in these patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Rehabilitation Following ACL Repair with Internal Brace Ligament Augmentation in Female Gymnast: A Resident's Case Report

Introduction

Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injuries continue to be a major source of morbidity in gymnastics. The gold standard is to perform an ACL Reconstruction (ACLR). However, injuries to the proximal femoral attachment of the ACL have demonstrated an ability to regenerate. An alternative surgical intervention to the ACLR in this ACL tear subgroup is an ACL repair. The purpose of this case report is to provide a rehabilitation progression for a female gymnast after an ACL repair with Internal Brace Ligament Augmentation (IBLA).

Case Description

The subject was a 16-year-old female who presented with a Sherman Type 1 proximal avulsion of her ACL. She underwent an ACL repair with IBLA. Physical therapy interventions followed a sequential and multi-phased approach based on time for tissue physiologic healing and individual progression. Patient reported outcomes including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI) and the Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome Yellow Flag (OSPRO-YF) were assessed in conjunction with isokinetic strength and hop performance testing to determine return to sport readiness.

Outcomes

The subject completed 42 sessions over the course of 26 weeks in addition to a home exercise program. At return to sport, clinically meaningful improvement was observed in patient reported outcomes including the IKDC, ACL-RSI, and OSPRO-YF. Additionally, strength and hop performance surpassed established thresholds of clinical significance. The subject returned to sport at six months post-operatively.

Conclusion

The subject in this case report returned to full participation in gymnastics six months after an ACL repair with internal bracing following a sequential and multi-phased rehabilitation. The primary ACL repair with IBLA appeared beneficial to this patient and could benefit from additional study in other athletes and athletic populations.

Level of Evidence

Level 5.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport after Injury Scale (ACL-RSI) Scores over Time After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Psychological readiness is an important consideration for athletes and clinicians when making return to sport decisions following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). To improve our understanding of the extent of deficits in psychological readiness, a systematic review is necessary.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate psychological readiness (measured via the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury scale (ACL-RSI)) over time after ACL tear and understand if time between injury and surgery, age, and sex are associated with ACL-RSI scores.

METHODS

Seven databases were searched from the earliest date available to March 22, 2022. Articles reporting ACL-RSI scores after ACL tear were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I, RoB-2, and RoBANS tools based on the study design. Evidence certainty was assessed for each analysis. Random-effects meta-analyses pooled ACL-RSI scores, stratified by time post-injury and based on treatment approach (i.e., early ACLR, delayed ACLR, and unclear approach).

RESULTS

A total of 83 studies were included in this review (78% high risk of bias). Evidence certainty was 'weak' or 'limited' for all analyses. Overall, ACL-RSI scores were higher at 3 to 6 months post-ACLR (mean = 61.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 58.6, 64.4], I2 = 94%) compared to pre-ACLR (mean = 44.4 [95% CI 38.2, 50.7], I2 = 98%), remained relatively stable, until they reached the highest point 2 to 5 years after ACLR (mean = 70.7 [95% CI 63.0, 78.5], I2 = 98%). Meta-regression suggests shorter time from injury to surgery, male sex, and older age were associated with higher ACL-RSI scores only 3 to 6 months post-ACLR (heterogeneity explained R2 = 47.6%), and this reduced 1-2 years after ACLR (heterogeneity explained R2 = 27.0%).

CONCLUSION

Psychological readiness to return to sport appears to improve early after ACL injury, with little subsequent improvement until ≥ 2-years after ACLR. Longer time from injury to surgery, female sex and older age might be negatively related to ACL-RSI scores 12-24 months after ACLR. Due to the weak evidence quality rating and the considerable importance of psychological readiness for long-term outcomes after ACL injury, there is an urgent need for well-designed studies that maximize internal validity and identify additional prognostic factors for psychological readiness at times critical for return to sport decisions.

REGISTRATION

Open Science Framework (OSF), https://osf.io/2tezs/ .

Usefulness of Current Patient-Reported Outcome Scales for ACL Injury: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Stakeholder-Perceived Utility of Specific Constructs and Items Across the Rehabilitation Timeline

Background

Numerous patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been used in patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), often with overlapping constructs of interest and limited content validity. Inefficient scale application increases burden and diminishes overall usefulness for both the patient and practitioner.

Purpose

To isolate specific PROM items across a diverse set of constructs that patients and practitioners perceive as having the greatest value at various stages of recovery and return to sport (RTS) in patients after ACLR.

Study Design

Cross-sectional study.

Methods

A combined 77 stakeholders participated in this 2-phase mixed-methods investigation. In phase 1, a total of 27 patients and 21 practitioners selected individual PROM items from various constructs that had the greatest utility or importance. In phase 2, the highest rated items were further tested in a head-to-head comparison with 29 stakeholders who attended the 2022 ACL Injury Research Retreat. In addition to the utility assessment, practitioners answered other questions related to importance and timing of PROM assessments.

Results

In phase 1, both patients and practitioners shared the same top item in 6 of the 8 (75%) constructs assessed. In phase 2, the construct of psychological burden was rated as "extremely important" by 59% of respondents, followed by physical function (54%), symptoms (35%), and donor site issues (10%). The PROM items of confidence, perceived likelihood of reinjury, and difficulty stopping quickly were rated by a respective 93%, 89%, and 86% of the sample as either "very useful" or "extremely useful." All constructs except donor site issues were rated by most stakeholders to be absolutely necessary to evaluate treatment progress and RTS readiness at the 6-month postoperative time and at RTS.

Conclusion

Overall, psychological burden, with specific items related to confidence and reinjury likelihood, were rated as most important and useful by both patients and practitioners. The second most important and useful PROM item was related to higher intensity function (eg, decelerating or jumping/landing activities during sports).

The Psychology of ACL Injury, Treatment, and Recovery: Current Concepts and Future Directions

CONTEXT

Interest in the relationship between psychology and the outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) continues to grow as variable rates of return to preinjury level of activity continue to be observed.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Articles were collected from peer-reviewed sources available on PubMed using a combination of search terms, including psychology, resilience, mental health, recovery, and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Further evaluation of the included bibliographies were used to expand the evidence.

STUDY DESIGN

Clinical review.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4.

RESULTS

General mental health and wellbeing, in addition to a host of unique psychological traits (self-efficacy, resilience, psychological readiness and distress, pain catastrophizing, locus of control, and kinesiophobia) have been demonstrated convincingly to affect treatment outcomes. Moreover, compelling evidence suggests that a number of these traits may be modifiable. Although the effect of resilience on outcomes of orthopaedic surgical procedures has been studied extensively, there is very limited information linking this unique psychological trait to the outcomes of ACLR. Similarly, the available information related to other parameters, such as pain catastrophizing, is limited with respect to the existence of adequately sized cohorts capable of accommodating more rigorous and compelling analyses. A better understanding of the specific mechanisms through which psychological traits influence outcomes can inform future interventions intended to improve rates of return to preinjury level of activity after ACLR.

CONCLUSION

The impact of psychology on patients' responses to ACL injury and treatment represents a promising avenue for improving low rates of return to preinjury activity levels among certain cohorts. Future research into these areas should focus on specific effects of targeted interventions on known, modifiable risk factors that commonly contribute to suboptimal clinical outcomes.

STRENGTH-OF-RECOMMENDATION TAXONOMY (SORT)

B.

Patients who undergo tibial tubercle anteromedialization with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction demonstrate similar rates of return to sport compared to isolated MPFL reconstruction

PURPOSE

To investigate the rate of return to sports and sport psychological readiness between patients who underwent isolated MPFLR (iMPFLR) compared to a matched cohort of patients who underwent MPFLR with anteromedializing tibial tubercle osteotomy (MPFLR/TTO).

METHODS

Patients who underwent primary MPFLR with or without TTO for recurrent patellar instability were retrospectively reviewed from 2012 to 2020 at a single institution. Preinjury sport and work information, Kujala, Tegner, Visual Analogue Score for pain, satisfaction and MPFL-Return to Sport after Injury (MPFL-RSI) score were collected. Two readers independently measured the tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance, Caton-Deschamps index and Dejour classification for trochlear dysplasia. Patients in iMPFLR and MPFLR/TTO groups were matched 1:1 on age, sex, body mass index and follow-up length. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to determine whether the MPFL-RSI was associated with a return to sport.

RESULTS

This study included 74 patients at mean follow-up of 52.5 months (range: 24-117). These groups returned to sport at similar rates (iMPFLR: 67.6%, MPFLR/TTO: 73.0%, not significant [ns]), though iMPFLR patients returned more quickly (8.4 vs. 12.8 months, p = 0.019). Rates of return to preinjury sport level were also similar (45.9% vs. 40.5%, ns). Patients with Dejour B/C took more time to return to sport compared to patients with mild/no trochlear pathology (13.8 vs. 7.9 months, p = 0.003). Increasing MPFL-RSI score was significantly predictive of the overall return to sport (odds ratio [OR]: 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.03, 1.13], p < 0.001) and return to preinjury level (OR: 1.07, 95% CI [1.04, 1.13], p < 0.001). Most patients in iMPFLR and MPFLR/TTO groups resumed work (95.7% vs. 88.5%, ns), though iMPFLR patients who returned to preinjury work levels did so more quickly (1.7 vs. 4.6 months, p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Patients who underwent MPFLR with anteromedializing TTO demonstrated similar rates of return to sport and psychological readiness compared to an isolated MPFLR matched comparison group, though iMPFLRs returned more quickly. Patients with more severe trochlear pathology required more time to return to sports.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Short-term fear of movement improves less after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with concomitant meniscus repair

BACKGROUND

Psychological response is important in return-to-sport decisions for athletes recovering from anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The purpose of this study was to compare psychological response after ACLR with a concomitant meniscus repair compared to isolated ACLR.

METHODS

Thirty-five individuals completed the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return-to-Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) scale before ACLR and 2, 4, and 6 months after ACLR. Participants were dichotomized based on presence of concomitant meniscus repair (Yes/No). Separate group X time repeated measures analyses of variance were conducted for both scales.

RESULTS

Participants were 65.7% female, 19.1 ± 4.7 years old with BMI of 24.9 ± 4.4 kg/m2. Sixteen individuals had an isolated ACLR with 19 individuals having an ACLR with concomitant meniscus repair. For the TSK, there was a group × time interaction effect(p = 0.028), with improvement in TSK scores for the isolated ACLR group (ACLR:2 months = 24.8 ± 3.7; 4 months = 22.0 ± 5.7; 6 months: 19.9 ± 5.9; Meniscus Repair:2 months = 25.5 ± 4.7; 4 months = 24.1 ± 5.0; 6 months: 23.8 ± 4.7). Six months after ACLR, TSK scores were worse in the meniscus repair group(p = 0.036). For the ACL-RSI, there was no interaction(p = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

Concomitant meniscus repair with ACLR results in less post-operative improvement in kinesiophobia through 6 months after ACLR compared to isolated ACLR.

Comparison of Revision ACL Reconstruction Using Iliotibial Band Augmented With Allograft Versus Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft With Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis

Background

Bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is one of the conventional techniques in the revision setting especially after a primary hamstring tendon graft. The use of the iliotibial band (ITB) augmented with allograft (AG) is an encouraging graft alternative for ACLR in terms of clinical and biomechanical data in the literature.

Purpose

To compare the clinical outcomes of BTB graft with lateral extra-articular tenodesis, modified Lemaire (BTB-LET), and an ITB graft augmented with hamstring AG (ITB-AG) in the setting of revision ACLR.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

Descriptive data and clinical outcomes were prospectively collected from patients who underwent revision ACLR with either the BTB-LET or ITB-AG technique between 2012 and 2020 and who had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. The clinical outcomes were assessed by the Lysholm, Tegner, Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury, International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee evaluation form, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. Return to sports, complications, and revisions were also analyzed.

Results

A total of 167 patients were included, with 106 patients in the BTB-LET group and 61 patients in the ITB-AG group. There were no significant group differences in sociodemographic characteristics; however, the mean follow-up was significantly longer in the BTB-LET compared with the ITB-AG group (52.0 vs 38.8 months, respectively; P = .0001). There were no significant differences in postoperative outcome scores; however, patients in the ITB-AG group had a higher rate of return to competitive pivoting sports (32.8% vs 17.9%; P = .0288) and a higher overall rate of return to preinjury sport (63.9% vs 47.2%; P = .0365). Complications, including revisions for meniscal or chondral lesions and retears (8 [8.3%] in the BTB-LET group and 2 [4.0%] in the ITB-AG group), were not significantly different. All retears were due to sports-related accidents.

Conclusion

In this study, ITB-AG was not different from BTB-LET in terms of functional outcomes scores but allowed better return to sport rate. Performing ITB-AG reconstruction in the setting of revision ACLR appears to be safe, effective, and associated with a satisfying return-to-sports rate.

The Dutch language short Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury scale has good to excellent construct validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability when assessing athletes undergoing rehabilitation after ACL injury or ACL reconstruction

OBJECTIVES

To examine the validity and reliability of the Dutch language short Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury scale (short ACL-RSI-NL) in recreational athletes undergoing rehabilitation after ACL injury or ACL reconstruction (ACLR).

METHODS

The original 12-item version of the ACL-RSI had been translated into Dutch. Short ACL-RSI-NL items were derived from this 12-item Dutch version. Content validity was evaluated by a team consisting of eight ACL experts and eight athletes. A cohort of 115 athletes with ACL injury or after ACLR completed the short ACL-RSI-NL and related questionnaires at various time points during their rehabilitation. Construct validity (hypothesis testing using Spearman correlations), internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), floor and ceiling effects (percentage of athletes having the lowest or highest score possible), and structural validity (exploratory factor analysis) were evaluated in the entire ACL athlete group. Test-retest reliability (using intra-class correlation, ICC; standard error of measurement, SEM; smallest detectable change, SDC, at both group and individual levels) was investigated in a subgroup of athletes with a stable outcome on psychological readiness within a two-week interval (n ​= ​27).

RESULTS

The short ACL-RSI-NL demonstrated good construct validity (83% of hypotheses confirmed). Internal consistency was excellent (Cronbach's alpha 0.84), and there were no floor and ceiling effects (≤13.9% lowest or highest score). Test-retest reliability was good (ICC 0.89 with 95% CI 0.77-0.95, SEM 6.93, SDC individual level 19.2, SDC group level 3.7). Exploratory factor analysis confirmed the presence of a single underlying factor (accounting for 56.4% of the total variance of the score).

CONCLUSION

The short ACL-RSI-NL exhibited good to excellent construct validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability. An averaged score ranging from 0 to 100 can be used to measure psychological readiness to return to sport. The short ACL-RSI-NL has potential for use in day-to-day practice to assess the psychological readiness of recreational athletes to return to sport after ACL injury or ACLR during their rehabilitation process.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Validation of the ACL-RSI Scale in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients

BACKGROUND

The Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) scale is a 12-item questionnaire assessing psychological readiness to return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. It has been validated for use in adults in multiple languages and in an abbreviated 6-question short form. Additionally, literature has been published using this scale in pediatric and adolescent populations, however it has not yet been validated for use with them.

PURPOSE

To validate the ACL-RSI scale for use with pediatric and adolescent patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

Scores of 6- and 12-item ACL-RSI scales for patients undergoing return-to-sport readiness testing 6 to 8 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were analyzed. Convergent validity testing was performed against the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC)/Pediatric IKDC score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score, and peak torque asymmetry of knee flexion and extension using Spearman correlations. Discriminant validity testing was performed against age (Spearman correlation), body mass index (Spearman correlation), and sex (Mann-Whitney U test). Reliability testing was performed by calculating Cronbach's alpha. Floor and ceiling effects were assessed by calculating the number of minimum and maximum scores in the cohort.

RESULTS

A total of 51 patients were included in the final analysis. The mean age at surgery was 15.2 ± 2.2 years, and 51.0% were female. The 6- and 12-item ACL-RSI scales demonstrated a strong significant positive correlation with IKDC/Pediatric IKDC scores (R = 0.723 and 0.717, respectively; P < .001) and moderate significant positive correlation with Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores (R = 0.516 and 0.502, respectively; P < .001) Age at surgery, body mass index, and sex were not correlated with either ACL-RSI scale. Cronbach's alpha values of the 12- and 6-item ACL-RSI scales in this population were 0.959 and 0.897, respectively. For both the 12- and the 6-item ACL-RSI scales, no floor or ceiling effects were found as the minimum score (0) was not observed in either version, and the maximum score (100) was only observed twice (3.9%) in both versions.

CONCLUSION

The ACL-RSI scale is valid to use with pediatric and adolescent patients. The 6-item scale may be a better choice because it has fewer redundancies and minimizes the risk of questionnaire fatigue.

It is time to target psychological readiness (or lack of readiness) in return to sports after Anterior Cruciate Ligament tears

Functional recovery has for long been the focus of rehabilitation after an Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injury. It is now increasingly recognized that more attention should be given to patients` mental recovery, their psychological readiness for returning to sport, after such an injury. Within this relatively new field of science, clinicians need clarity on when and how psychological factors should be monitored and how inexpedient psychological responses may be addressed during rehabilitation. In this Expert Opinion suggestions on how targeting psychological readiness may improve rehabilitation and return-to-sport evaluations are made based on current evidence-and issues in need of further clarification are addressed.

Return to Sports After ACL Augmentation With Anterolateral Reconstruction (ALR) Harvesting Gracilis Only Compared With ACL Reconstruction With ALR Harvesting Both Hamstring Tendons

BACKGROUND

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair (ACL-Rp) is known to be a valuable alternative to ACL reconstruction (ACL-Rc) in selected indications. The majority of the ACL-Rp techniques recommend the use of a synthetic brace. The use of the gracilis allows both a biological internal brace and anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALR).

PURPOSE

The primary objective was to compare the early ability to return to sports between patients who underwent ACL-Rp using a gracilis autograft as an internal brace augmentation with ALR and patients who underwent the conventional ACL-Rc with ALR technique sacrificing both the gracilis and the semitendinosus. The secondary objective was to compare the failure rate, clinical scores, and return to sports at a minimum follow-up of 2 years.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was undertaken. A total of 49 patients who underwent ACL-Rp with ALR between December 2018 and May 2019 were propensity matched at a 1:1 ratio to those who underwent ACL-Rc with ALR during the same period. The decision to perform ACL-Rp with ALR was based on preoperative selection and intraoperative arthroscopic findings: proximal avulsion tear, partial ACL tear, low- to midlevel sports participation, and good tissue quality. The ability to return to sports was assessed using isokinetic tests and the Knee Santy Athletic Return to Sport test functional test at 6 months postoperatively. At the final follow-up, knee laxity parameters, return to sports, and clinical outcome (Lysholm score, Tegner Activity Scale score, International Knee Documentation Committee score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury score) were recorded.

RESULTS

The ACL-Rp group had significantly less hamstring strength deficit when compared with their counterparts who underwent ACL-Rc (0.2% vs 10.2% in concentric, P < .001; 2.5% vs 14% in eccentric, P < .001). The mean Knee Santy Athletic Return to Sport test score was significantly higher in the ACL-Rc group (69.7% ± 16.6% [range, 19%-100%] vs 61% ± 16.8% [range, 19%-100%]; P = .001). In the ACL-Rp group, 61% (30/49) of the patients were authorized to return to pivot sports versus 41% (20/49) in the ACL-Rc group (P = .04). At a mean final follow-up of 31.4 ± 3.5 months, no significant differences were demonstrated between groups with respect to clinical scores and knee laxity parameters. There was a trend for a higher failure rate in the ACL-Rp group without any significance (ACL-Rp: 6.1% [3/49] vs ACL-Rc: 0%; P = .08).

CONCLUSION

At 6 months after operation, harvesting only the gracilis with this ACL-Rp and augmentation with ALR technique was linked to a better early ability to return to sports compared with the ACL-Rc with ALR technique harvesting both the gracilis and semitendinosus. This technique had a limited effect on early flexion strength and provided a satisfactory rerupture rate.

Patients Who Return to Sport After Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Have Significantly Higher Psychological Readiness: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 3744 Patients

BACKGROUND

Although objective outcomes assessing knee function are essential measurements for return to sport, psychological factors have become increasingly recognized as equally important parameters for determining an athlete's ability to return to sport after surgery.

PURPOSE

To systematically review the literature to determine whether patients who returned to sport after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction had improved psychological scores (as measured with validated questionnaires) compared with patients who did not return to sport.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and was preregistered on PROSPERO. Four databases were searched for level 1 to 3 studies that compared at least 1 psychological outcome measured by a validated questionnaire for patients who did and did not return to sport after primary ACL reconstruction. The following data were recorded: study and patient characteristics; psychological metrics (ACL-Return to Sport Injury [ACL-RSI] scale, Knee Self-Efficacy Scale [K-SES], and Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia [TSK/TSK-11]); International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score; and clinical metrics. Study methodological quality was analyzed using the methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS), and the mean difference (MD) and 95% CI were calculated for each psychological outcome score using the inverse variance method.

RESULTS

We included and analyzed 16 articles (3744 patients; 38.9% female; mean age range, 17-28.7 years; mean MINORS score, 19.9 ± 1.4). Overall, 61.8% of athletes returned to sport (66.8% of male patients; 55.4% of female patients). Patients who returned scored significantly higher on the ACL-RSI scale (MD, 20.8; 95% CI, 15.9 to 25.7; P < .001), significantly higher on the K-SES (MD, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.2 to 2.3; P = .036), and significantly lower on the TSK/TSK-11 (MD, 10.1%; 95% CI, -12.1% to -8.2%; P = .004). Those returning to sport did not exceed the minimal clinically important difference for IKDC score versus those not returning to sport.

CONCLUSION

Patients who returned to sport after primary ACL reconstruction had significantly higher psychological readiness, higher self-efficacy, and lower kinesiophobia compared with those who did not return to sport, despite having clinically similar knee function scores. Evaluation of psychological readiness, in combination with other objective measurements, is a critical component of return-to-sport evaluation in athletes after primary ACL reconstruction.

REGISTRATION

CRD42021284735 (PROSPERO).

Responsiveness of the Indonesian Versions of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport After Injury Score, the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form, and the Lysholm Score in Patients With ACL Injury

Background

The Indonesian versions of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI), International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee form (IKDC), and the Lysholm scores are considered valid and reliable for Indonesian-speaking patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury.

Purpose/Hypothesis

The purpose of this study was to determine the responsiveness of the ACL-RSI, IKDC, and Lysholm scores in an Indonesian-speaking population with ACL injury. It was hypothesized that they would have good responsiveness.

Study Design

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

Methods

Between March 1, 2021, and February 28, 2022, patients with an ACL injury at a single hospital in Indonesia were asked to complete the ACL-RSI, IKDC, and Lysholm scores before either reconstruction surgery or nonoperative treatment. At 6 months after treatment, the patients completed all 3 scores a second time, plus a global rating of change question. The distribution-based and the anchor-based methods were used to study responsiveness. For each scale, the standardized response mean, minimal clinically important difference (MCID), and minimal detectable change (MDC; at the group [MDCgr] and individual [MDCind] levels) for each scale were determined.

Results

Of 80 eligible patients, 75 (93.8%) completed the study. The standardized response means for the ACL-RSI, IKDC, and Lysholm scores were 1.59, 1.72, and 1.51, respectively, indicating good responsiveness. The MCIDs for the ACL-RSI, IKDC, and Lysholm scores were 6.8, 7.8, and 4.8, respectively; all MCIDs were larger than that of the MDCgr (1.1, 0.7, and 0.6, respectively). At the individual level, the MCID for the IKDC was larger than the MDCind (7.8 vs 5.8). However, the MCIDs for ACL-RSI and Lysholm scores were smaller than those of the MDCind (6.8 vs 10.9 and 4.8 vs 5.1, respectively).

Conclusion

The Indonesian ACL-RSI, IKDC, and Lysholm scores indicated good responsiveness and can be used in the follow-up of patients after ACL injury, especially at the group level. In individual patients, IKDC was found to be more efficient than the ACL-RSI or Lysholm scores for detecting clinically important changes over time after ACL treatment.

Translation, Validity, and Reliability of the Indonesian Version of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport After Injury Scale

Background

The Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI) scale measures athletes' emotion, confidence, and risk appraisal when returning to sports after an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and/or ACL reconstruction (ACLR).

Purpose

To translate the ACL-RSI into the Indonesian language and to assess its validity and reliability in Indonesian-speaking patients after ACLR.

Study Design

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

Methods

After a forward-and-backward translation procedure, the validity and reliability of the Indonesian version of the ACL-RSI (I-ACL-RSI) were investigated. Patients who had undergone ACLR at a single hospital were asked to complete 4 questionnaires: I-ACL-RSI, Injury-Psychological Readiness to Return to Sport, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, and International Knee Documentation Committee. After a 2-week interval, patients were asked to complete the I-ACL-RSI a second time. Following the COSMIN reporting guidelines (Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments), we determined construct validity using hypothesis testing, as well as test-retest reliability, internal consistency, floor and ceiling effects, and measurement error.

Results

Of 200 eligible patients, 102 (51%) were included in the analysis. All predefined hypotheses on correlations between the I-ACL-RSI and the other questionnaires were confirmed, indicating good construct validity. An intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.90 (2-way random, type agreement) was found for the first and second I-ACL-RSI scores, indicating good test-retest reliability. A Cronbach α of 0.95 indicated good internal consistency, and no floor or ceiling effects were found. The standard error of measurement was 3.9, with the minimal detectable change calculated as 10.9 points at the individual level and 1.1 points at the group level.

Conclusion

Based on the study findings, the I-ACL-RSI can be considered a valid and reliable questionnaire for Indonesian-speaking patients after ACL injury and/or ACLR.

Patients that maintain their pre-injury level of physical activity 3-5 years after ACL reconstruction are, 18 months after surgery, characterised by higher levels of readiness to return to sport

PURPOSE

To characterise patients who had returned to their pre-injury physical activity (PA) or higher at 18 months and maintained that level of PA 3-5 years after the primary ACL reconstruction and to describe the level, frequency, and type of PA participation during the first 5 years after ACL reconstruction  METHOD: Data, from follow-ups at 18 months and 3-5 years after an ACL reconstruction, were extracted from a rehabilitation-specific register. Patients, 15-65 years of age, were included. The data comprised patient-reported outcomes and the results from two questions with respect to the level, frequency, and type of PA. Comparisons were made between patients who had and had not maintained their pre-injury level of PA at the follow-up 3-5 years after an ACL reconstruction.

RESULTS

A total of 272 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean follow-up time was 3.8 years (min-max: 2.9-5.1) after the ACL reconstruction. Of patients who had returned to their pre-injury or a higher level of PA at the 18 month follow-up (n = 114), 68% (n = 78) maintained that level at the 3- to 5-year follow-up after ACL reconstruction. These patients reported a higher level of psychological readiness to return to sport (98 versus 79; p = 0.013). Moreover, these patients were 6.0 years older (p = 0.016) and were characterised by male sex (56% versus 44%; p = 0.028) and a lower level of pre-injury PA (p = 0.013). At the follow-up 3-5 years after the ACL reconstruction, more than 90% met the recommendations for PA. However, the prevalence of physical inactivity had increased and the involvement in organised PA had decreased compared with the 18-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Two out of three patients who have returned to their previous level of PA at 18 months can be expected to maintain that level, 3-5 years following ACL reconstruction. These patients were mainly characterised by a higher level of psychological readiness, especially in patients who participated in knee-strenuous sport and were younger than 20 years of age. The results of this study suggest that patients become more physically inactive over time, implicating the importance of clinicians helping patients find a suitable PA that may help patients maintain an active lifestyle.

Fear of reinjury following primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review

PURPOSE

This review aims to elucidate the most commonly reported method to quantify fear of reinjury or kinesiophobia and to identify key variables that influence the degree of kinesiophobia following primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

METHODS

A systematic search across three databases (Pubmed, Ovid (MEDLINE), and EMBASE) was conducted from database inception to August 7th, 2022. The authors adhered to the PRISMA guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Quality assessment of the included studies was conducted according to the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies satisfied the inclusion criteria and resulted in 2,213 total patients with a mean age of 27.6 years and a mean follow-up time of 36.7 months post-surgery. The mean MINORS score of the included studies was 11 out of 16 for non-comparative studies and 18 out of 24 for comparative studies. Eighty-eight percent of included studies used variations of the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) to quantify kinesiophobia and 27.0% used Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI). The results of this study shows a common association between higher kinesiophobia and poor patient-reported functional status measured using International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Scores, Activity of Daily Living (ADL), Quality of Life (QOL), and Sports/Recreation (S/R) subscales of Knee Osteoarthritis and Outcome Score (KOOS) and Lysholm scores. Postoperative symptoms and pain catastrophizing measured using the KOOS pain and symptom subscales and Pain Catastrophizing Score (PCS) also influenced the degree of kinesiophobia following ACLR. Patients with an increased injury to surgery time and being closer to the date of surgery postoperatively demonstrated higher levels of kinesiophobia. Less common variables included being a female patient, low preoperative and postoperative activity status and low self-efficacy.

CONCLUSION

The most common methods used to report kinesiophobia following primary ACLR were variations of the TSK scale followed by ACL-RSI. The most commonly reported factors influencing higher kinesiophobia in this patient population include lower patient-reported functional status, more severe postoperative symptoms such as pain, increased injury to surgery time, and being closer to the date of surgery postoperatively. Kinesiophobia following primary ACLR is a critical element affecting post-surgical outcomes, and screening should be implemented postoperatively to potentially treat in rehabilitation and recovery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Comparison of anchor-based methods for estimating thresholds of meaningful within-patient change using simulated PROMIS PF 20a data under various joint distribution characteristic conditions

PURPOSE

To compare the performance of anchor-based methods for estimating thresholds of meaningful within-patient change (i.e., individual change) of clinical outcome assessments in conditions reflecting data characteristics of small- to medium-sized clinical trials.

METHODS

Datasets were generated from the joint distributions of the PROMIS PF 20a T-score changes and a seven-point global change anchor measure. The 108 simulation conditions (1000 replications per condition) included combinations of three marginal distributions of T-score changes, three improvement percentages in the anchor measure, four levels of responsiveness correlations, and three sample sizes. Threshold estimation methods included mean change, median change, ROC curve, predictive modeling, half SD, and SEM. Relative bias, precision, accuracy, and measurement significance of the estimates were evaluated based on comparison with true thresholds and IRT-based individual reliable changes of PROMIS scores. Quantile regression models were applied to select and interpret effects of simulation conditions on estimation bias.

RESULTS

When PROMIS T-score changes were distributed normally, the predictive modeling method performed best with 50% or more responders identified by the anchor; the mean and median methods were preferred with 30% responders. For skewed distributions, the median method and ROC method gained more advantages. Among the evaluated study conditions, the improvement percentage condition had the most obvious effects on estimation bias.

CONCLUSION

To establish accurate and precise thresholds, clinical researchers are recommended to prioritize study designs with at least 50% anchor-defined responders and strongly responsive target endpoints with highly reliable scoring calibration and to select optimal anchor-based methods given the data characteristics.

Psychological Readiness to Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the Adolescent Athlete

CONTEXT

Psychological readiness to return to sport has been shown to be associated with future play after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery but has not been extensively studied in adolescent athletes.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the psychometric properties of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) scale in adolescent athletes at multiple time points after ACL reconstruction surgery and determine whether psychological readiness scores at 6 months predict return to competition sport at 12 months.

DESIGN

Case series.

SETTING

Private orthopaedic clinic.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS

A total of 115 adolescent athletes (65 girls, 50 boys) 17 years and younger who had undergone primary unilateral ACL reconstruction.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The ACL-RSI scale was administered at 6 and 12 months after surgery, and return-to-sport status was also documented. Factor analysis was undertaken and predictive validity assessed using between-groups comparisons and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve statistics.

RESULTS

The ACL-RSI scores increased between 6 and 12 months (55 to 71; P < .001, effect size = 0.98). No floor or ceiling effects were present, and the scale had high internal consistency (Cronbach α at 6 months = 0.91 and at 12 months = 0.94). Principal component analysis showed that 2 factors were present: the first represented performance confidence and risk appraisal and the second, emotions. For the full-scale ACL-RSI, scores at 6 months had acceptable predictive ability for a return to play at 12 months (area under the ROC curve = 0.7, P = .03). When the 2 identified factors were analyzed separately, the emotions factor also had acceptable predictive ability (area under the ROC curve = 0.73, P = .009), but the confidence in performance and risk appraisal factors had poor predictive ability (area under the ROC curve = 0.59, P = .09).

CONCLUSIONS

Greater psychological readiness was associated with return to sport in adolescent athletes after ACL reconstruction, with the athletes' emotional response appearing to be more influential than their confidence in their performance or their appraisal of risk.