Anterior Cruciate Ligament Loading Increases With Pivot-Shift Mechanism During Asymmetrical Drop Vertical Jump in Female Athletes

Comparing novel smartphone pose estimation frameworks with the Kinect V2 for knee tracking during athletic stress tests

PURPOSE

To compare the accuracy of the Microsoft Kinect V2 with novel pose estimation frameworks, in assessing knee kinematics during athletic stress tests, for fast and portable risk assessment of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury.

METHODS

We captured 254 varsity athletes, using the Kinect V2 and a smartphone application utilizing Google's MediaPipe framework. The devices were placed as close as possible and used to capture a person, facing the cameras, performing one of three athletic stress tests at a distance of 2.5 ms. Custom software translated the results from both frameworks to the same format. We then extracted relevant knee angles at key moments of the jump and compared them, using the Kinect V2 as the ground truth.

RESULTS

The results show relatively small angle differences between the two solutions in the coronal plane and moderate angle differences on the sagittal plane. Overall, the MediaPipe framework results seem to underestimate both knee valgus angles and knee sagittal angles compared to the Kinect V2.

CONCLUSION

This preliminary study demonstrates the potential for Google's MediaPipe framework to be used for calculating lower limb kinematics during athletic stress test motions, which can run on most modern smartphones, as it produces similar results to the Kinect V2. A smartphone application similar to the one developed could potentially be used for low cost and widespread ACL injury prevention.

Computational study of extrinsic factors affecting ACL strain during single-leg jump landing

BACKGROUND

Non-contact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are a major concern in sport-related activities due to dynamic knee movements. There is a paucity of finite element (FE) studies that have accurately replicated the knee geometry, kinematics, and muscle forces during dynamic activities. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a knee FE model and use it to quantify the relationships between sagittal plane knee kinematics, kinetics and the resulting ACL strain.

METHODS

3D images of a cadaver knee specimen were segmented (bones, cartilage, and meniscus) and meshed to develop the FE model. Knee ligament insertion sites were defined in the FE model via experimental digitization of the specimen's ligaments. The response of the model was validated against multiple physiological knee movements using published experimental data. Single-leg jump landing motions were then simulated on the validated model with muscle forces and kinematic inputs derived from motion capture and rigid body modelling of ten participants.

RESULTS

The maximum ACL strain measured with the model during jump landing was 3.5 ± 2.2%, comparable to published experimental results. Bivariate analysis showed no significant correlation between body weight, ground reaction force and sagittal plane parameters (such as joint flexion angles, joint moments, muscle forces, and joint velocity) and ACL strain. Multivariate regression analysis showed increasing trunk, hip and ankle flexion angles decreases ACL strain (R2 = 90.04%, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Soft landing decreases ACL strain and the relationship could be presented through an empirical equation. The model and the empirical relation developed in this study could be used to better predict ACL injury risk and prevention strategies during dynamic activities.

Insufficient Evidence for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Utilizing Suture Tape Augmentation: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes at Minimum 1-Year Follow-up

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review of clinical studies to directly compare clinical outcomes of patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with versus without suture tape (ST) augmentation.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed by searching PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase to identify comparative studies directly comparing outcomes of ACLR with versus without ST augmentation with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. The search terms used were anterior cruciate ligament suture tape. Patients were evaluated based on graft failure rates, return to sport (RTS), anteroposterior (AP) laxity, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

RESULTS

Five studies (all Level III) met inclusion criteria, including a total of 246 patients undergoing ACLR with ST augmentation (SA group) and 282 patients undergoing ACLR without augmentation (control group). Patient age ranged from 14.9 to 29.7 years. The mean follow-up time ranged from 24.0 to 48.6 months. The mean body mass index ranged from 25.3 to 26.3 kg/m2 and the overall percentage of males ranged from 43.4% to 69.0%. Overall, the graft failure rate ranged from 1.0% to 25.0% in the SA group and 8.0% to 20.0% in the control group. Among the studies that reported RTS rates, the rate ranged from 69.2% to 88.9% in the SA group and 51.5% to 87.5% in the control group. Among all PROs, 2 studies found a significant difference in the Tegner score favoring the SA group. Otherwise, no significant differences were found between groups in terms of PROs. No significant differences in AP laxity were found between groups within any particular study. There was heterogeneity between studies regarding surgical techniques, postoperative rehabilitation protocols, and reported PROs.

CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to suggest that patients undergoing ACLR with ST augmentation may experience favorable clinical outcomes compared with ACLR alone.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, systematic review of Level III studies.

Two-to-three times increase in natural hip and lumbar non-sagittal plane kinematics can lead to anterior cruciate ligament injury and cartilage failure scenarios during single-leg landings

BACKGROUND

Analyzing sports injuries is essential to mitigate risk for injury, but inherently challenging using in vivo approaches. Computational modeling is a powerful engineering tool used to access biomechanical information on tissue failure that cannot be obtained otherwise using traditional motion capture techniques.

METHODS

We extrapolated high-risk kinematics associated with ACL strain and cartilage load and stress from a previous motion analysis of 14 uninjured participants. Computational simulations were used to induce ACL failure strain and cartilage failure load, stress, and contact pressure in two age- and BMI-matched participants, one of each biological sex, during single-leg cross drop and single-leg drop tasks. The high-risk kinematics were exaggerated in 20% intervals, within their physiological range of motion, to determine if injury occurred in the models. Where injury occurred, we reported the kinematic profiles that led to tissue failure.

FINDINGS

Our findings revealed ACL strains up to 9.99%, consistent with reported failure values in existing literature. Cartilage failure was observed in all eight analyzed conditions when increasing each high-risk kinematic parameter by 2.61 ± 0.67 times the participants' natural landing values. The kinematics associated with tissue failure included peak hip internal rotation of 22.48 ± 19.04°, peak hip abduction of 22.51 ± 9.09°, and peak lumbar rotation away from the stance limb of 11.56 ± 9.78°.

INTERPRETATION

Our results support the ability of previously reported high-risk kinematics in the literature to induce injury and add to the literature by reporting extreme motion limits leading to injurious cases. Therefore, training programs able to modify these motions during single-leg landings may reduce the risk of ACL injury and cartilage trauma.

Detecting side-to-side differences of lower limb biomechanics during single-legged forward landing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Motion analysis can be used to evaluate functional recovery after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction; however, the biomechanics parameters of the lower limb that are specifically altered in ACL-reconstructed knees compared to the contralateral side are not well understood. This retrospective study aimed to compare side-to-side differences in lower limb biomechanics during the first 100 milliseconds (ms) after initial contact in a single-leg forward landing task.

METHODS

Using three-dimensional motion analysis, lower joint kinematic and kinetic variables were measured 8-10 months postoperatively in 22 patients who had undergone ACL reconstruction. We determined side-to-side differences in lower limb biomechanics over the 100-ms timeframe after landing, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to calculate the area under the curve (AUC) for parameters showing significant side-to-side differences.

RESULTS

During the 100-ms timeframe after landing, 58 kinematic and kinetic items showed significant side-to-side differences. Side-to-side differences in lower limb biomechanics over the 40-ms timeframe after landing existed. The ROC curve analysis identified 11 items with AUC values ≥ 0.70, including hip flexion, abduction moment, and knee joint power, and their AUC values were not significantly different.

CONCLUSION

Hip flexion/abduction moment and knee power after GRF max could be used as outcomes for assessing functional recovery in patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction.

Effect of Whole Body Parameters on Knee Joint Biomechanics: Implications for ACL Injury Prevention During Single-Leg Landings

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have examined the effect of whole body (WB) parameters on anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) strain and loads, as well as knee joint kinetics and kinematics. However, articular cartilage damage occurs in relation to ACL failure, and the effect of WB parameters on ACL strain and articular cartilage biomechanics during dynamic tasks is unclear.

PURPOSES

(1) To investigate the effect of WB parameters on ACL strain, as well as articular cartilage stress and contact force, during a single-leg cross drop (SLCD) and single-leg drop (SLD). (2) To identify WB parameters predictive of high ACL strain during these tasks.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study.

METHODS

Three-dimensional motion analysis data from 14 physically active men and women were recorded during an SLCD and SLD. OpenSim was used to obtain their kinematics, kinetics, and muscle forces for the WB model. Using these data in kinetically driven finite element simulations of the knee joint produced outputs of ACL strains and articular cartilage stresses and contact forces. Spearman correlation coefficients were used to assess relationships between WB parameters and ACL strain and cartilage biomechanics. Moreover, receiver operating characteristic curve analyses and multivariate binary logistic regressions were used to find the WB parameters that could discriminate high from low ACL strain trials.

RESULTS

Correlations showed that more lumbar rotation away from the stance limb at peak ACL strain had the strongest overall association (ρ = 0.877) with peak ACL strain. Higher knee anterior shear force (ρ = 0.895) and lower gluteus maximus muscle force (ρ = 0.89) at peak ACL strain demonstrated the strongest associations with peak articular cartilage stress or contact force in ≥1 of the analyzed tasks. The regression model that used muscle forces to predict high ACL strain trials during the dominant limb SLD yielded the highest accuracy (93.5%), sensitivity (0.881), and specificity (0.952) among all regression models.

CONCLUSION

WB parameters that were most consistently associated with and predictive of high ACL strain and poor articular cartilage biomechanics during the SLCD and SLD tasks included greater knee abduction angle at initial contact and higher anterior shear force at peak ACL strain, as well as lower gracilis, gluteus maximus, and medial gastrocnemius muscle forces.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Knowledge of which landing postures create a high risk for ACL or cartilage injury may help reduce injuries in athletes by avoiding those postures and practicing the tasks with reduced high-risk motions, as well as by strengthening the muscles that protect the knee during single-leg landings.

Comparison of side-cutting maneuvers versus low impact baseball swing on knee ligament loading in adolescent populations

BACKGROUND

High impact sports are associated with an increased incidence rate for knee ligament injuries, specifically pertaining to the anterior cruciate ligament and medial collateral ligament. What is less clear is (i) the extent to which high impact activities preferentially load the anterior cruciate ligament versus the medial collateral ligament, and (ii) whether both ligaments experience similar stretch ratios during high loading scenarios. Therefore, the goal of this project was to assess how different loading conditions experienced through more at-risk sporting maneuvers influence the relative displacements of the anterior cruciate ligament and medial collateral ligament. The focus of the study was on adolescent patients - a group that has largely been overlooked when studying knee ligament biomechanics.

METHODS

Through kinetic knee data obtained through motion capture experimentation, two different loading conditions (high vs low impact) were applied to 22 specimen-specific adolescent finite element knee models to investigate the biomechanical impact various sporting maneuvers place on the knee ligaments.

FINDINGS

The high impact side cutting maneuver resulted in 102% and 47% increases in ligament displacement compared to the low impact baseball swing (p < 0.05) for both the anterior cruciate ligament and medial collateral ligament.

INTERPRETATION

Quantifying biomechanical risks that sporting activities place on adolescent subjects provides physicians with insight into knee ligament vulnerability. More specifically, knowing the risks that various sports place on ligaments helps guide the selection of sports for at-risk patients (especially those who have undergone knee ligament surgery).

Diagnostics Using the Change-of-Direction and Acceleration Test (CODAT) of the Biomechanical Patterns Associated with Knee Injury in Female Futsal Players: A Cross-Sectional Analytical Study

The primary aim of this study was to identify kinematic differences at initial contact between female futsal players with and without previous knee injury, using a functional motor pattern test. The secondary aim was to determine kinematic differences between the dominant and non-dominant limb in the whole group, using the same test. A cross-sectional study was performed in 16 female futsal players allocated into two groups: eight females with a previous knee injury, i.e., affected by the valgus collapse mechanism without surgical intervention, and eight with no previous injury. The evaluation protocol included the change-of-direction and acceleration test (CODAT). One registration was made for each lower limb, i.e., the dominant (the preferred kicking limb) and non-dominant limb. A 3D motion capture system (Qualisys AB, Göteborg, Sweden) was used to analyze the kinematics. The Cohen's d effect sizes between the groups demonstrated a strong effect size towards more physiological positions in the non-injured group in the following kinematics in the dominant limb: hip adduction (Cohen's d = 0.82), hip internal rotation (Cohen's d = 0.88), and ipsilateral pelvis rotation (Cohen's d = 1.06). The t-test for the dominant and non-dominant limb in the whole group showed the following differences in knee valgus: dominant limb (9.02 ± 7.31 degrees) and non-dominant limb (1.27 ± 9.05 degrees) (p = 0.049). Conclusions: The players with no previous history of knee injury had a more physiological position for avoiding the valgus collapse mechanism in the hip adduction and internal rotation, and in the pelvis rotation in the dominant limb. All the players showed more knee valgus in the dominant limb, which is the limb at greater risk of injury.

Muscle Force Contributions to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Loading

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are one of the most common knee pathologies sustained during athletic participation and are characterised by long convalescence periods and associated financial burden. Muscles have the ability to increase or decrease the mechanical loads on the ACL, and thus are viable targets for preventative interventions. However, the relationship between muscle forces and ACL loading has been investigated by many different studies, often with differing methods and conclusions. Subsequently, this review aimed to summarise the evidence of the relationship between muscle force and ACL loading. A range of studies were found that investigated muscle and ACL loading during controlled knee flexion, as well as a range of weightbearing tasks such as walking, lunging, sidestep cutting, landing and jumping. The quadriceps and the gastrocnemius were found to increase load on the ACL by inducing anterior shear forces at the tibia, particularly when the knee is extended. The hamstrings and soleus appeared to unload the ACL by generating posterior tibial shear force; however, for the hamstrings, this effect was contingent on the knee being flexed greater than ~ 20° to 30°. The gluteus medius was consistently shown to oppose the knee valgus moment (thus unloading the ACL) to a magnitude greater than any other muscle. Very little evidence was found for other muscle groups with respect to their contribution to the loading or unloading of the ACL. It is recommended that interventions aiming to reduce the risk of ACL injury consider specifically targeting the function of the hamstrings, soleus and gluteus medius.

Hamstrings Contraction Regulates the Magnitude and Timing of the Peak ACL Loading During the Drop Vertical Jump in Female Athletes

Background

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury reduction training has focused on lower body strengthening and landing stabilization. In vitro studies have shown that quadriceps forces increase ACL strain, and hamstring forces decrease ACL strain. However, the magnitude of the effect of the quadriceps and hamstrings forces on ACL loading and its timing during in vivo landings remains unclear.

Purpose

To investigate the effect and timing of knee muscle forces on ACL loading during landing.

Study Design

Descriptive laboratory study.

Methods

A total of 13 young female athletes performed drop vertical jump trials, and their movements were recorded with 3-dimensional motion capture. Lower limb joint motion and muscle forces were estimated with OpenSim and applied to a musculoskeletal finite element (FE) model to estimate ACL loading during landings. The FE simulations were performed with 5 different conditions that included/excluded kinematics, ground-reaction force (GRF), and muscle forces.

Results

Simulation of landing kinematics without GRF or muscle forces yielded an estimated median ACL strain and force of 5.1% and 282.6 N. Addition of GRF to kinematic simulations increased ACL strain and force to 6.8% and 418.4 N (P < .05). Addition of quadriceps force to kinematics + GRF simulations nonsignificantly increased ACL strain and force to 7.2% and 478.5 N. Addition of hamstrings force to kinematics + GRF simulations decreased ACL strain and force to 2.6% and 171.4 N (P < .001). Addition of all muscles to kinematics + GRF simulations decreased ACL strain and force to 3.3% and 195.1 N (P < .001). With hamstrings force, ACL loading decreased from initial contact (time of peak: 1-18 milliseconds) while ACL loading without hamstrings force peaked at 47 to 98 milliseconds after initial contact (P = .024-.001). The knee flexion angle increased from 20.9° to 73.1° within 100 milliseconds after initial contact.

Conclusion

Hamstrings activation had greater effect relative to GRF and quadriceps activation on ACL loading, which significantly decreased and regulated the magnitude and timing of ACL loading during in vivo landings.

Clinical Relevance

Clinical training should focus on strategies that influence increased hamstrings activation during landing to reduce ACL loads.