Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Outcomes After Human Cord Blood-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Implantation for Chondral Defects of the Knee

Stem Cell-Laden Engineered Patch: Advances and Applications in Tissue Regeneration

Stem cell-based therapies are emerging as significant approaches in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, applicable to both fundamental scientific research and clinical practice. Despite remarkable results in clinical studies, challenges such as poor standardization of graft tissues, limited sources, and reduced functionality have hindered the effectiveness of these therapies. In this review, we summarize the engineering approaches involved in fabricating stem cell assisted patches and the substantial strategies for designing stem cell-laden engineered patches (SCP) to complement the existing stem cell-based therapies. We then outline the potential applications of SCP in advancing tissue regeneration and regenerative medicine. By combining living stem cells with engineered patches, SCP can enhance the functions of both components, particularly for tissue engineering applications. Finally, we addressed current challenges, such as ethical considerations, high costs, and regulatory hurdles and proposed future research directions to overcome these barriers.

Anterior-to-Central Cartilage Defects of Arthritic Knee Showed Better Cartilage Regeneration Than Posterior Cartilage Defects Using Mesenchymal Stem Cell Implantation

PURPOSE

To analyze cartilage regeneration and clinical outcomes after human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cell (hUCB-MSCs) implantation on the basis of the distribution and location of medial femoral condyle (MFC) cartilage defects.

METHODS

Patients who underwent hUCB-MSC implantation for MFC cartilage defects involved in isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis were included. The patients were divided into 2 groups, those with MFC defects located within the anterior-central portion (group A) and those with MFC defects extending to the posterior portion (group P). Cartilage regeneration was assessed using the Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) 2.0 scores. MFC cartilage defects were subdivided into anterior, central, and posterior regions. The total, regional MOCART scores, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall, 43 patients were included in this study (group A: 31 patients, group P: 12 patients), with 30 of 43 undergoing combined high tibial osteotomy. Cartilage defect size was significantly larger in group P than in group A (7.8 ± 1.9 cm2 vs 5.7 ± 2.4 cm2, P = .009). Group A demonstrated a significantly greater total MOCART score compared with group P (55.0 ± 12.3 vs 40.4 ± 9.2, P = .001). PROs at final follow-up showed significant improvement compared with preoperative values in both groups (all P < .001), with no significant differences in PROs between groups. The mean follow-ups for each group were 29.7 and 32.5 months, respectively. Defect size were significantly associated with the total MOCART score (P = .026) and unsatisfactory outcome (MOCART < 60) (P = .012, odds ratio 2.674). The cut-off value for defect size was 6.3 cm2 (area under the curve, 0.905; P < .001). In the comparison of regional MOCART scores within each patient, the anterior MOCART score was significantly greater than the central and posterior MOCART scores (P < .001 and P = .004, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Cartilage defects with osteoarthritis, which is smaller and primarily limited to the anterior-to-central portion showed better MOCART scores after hUCB-MSC implantation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Promotion of osteochondral repair through immune microenvironment regulation and activation of endogenous chondrogenesis via the release of apoptotic vesicles from donor MSCs

Utilizing transplanted human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (HUMSCs) for cartilage defects yielded advanced tissue regeneration, but the underlying mechanism remain elucidated. Early after HUMSCs delivery to the defects, we observed substantial apoptosis. The released apoptotic vesicles (apoVs) of HUMSCs promoted cartilage regeneration by alleviating the chondro-immune microenvironment. ApoVs triggered M2 polarization in macrophages while simultaneously facilitating the chondrogenic differentiation of endogenous MSCs. Mechanistically, in macrophages, miR-100-5p delivered by apoVs activated the MAPK/ERK signaling pathway to promote M2 polarization. In MSCs, let-7i-5p delivered by apoVs promoted chondrogenic differentiation by targeting the eEF2K/p38 MAPK axis. Consequently, a cell-free cartilage regeneration strategy using apoVs combined with a decellularized cartilage extracellular matrix (DCM) scaffold effectively promoted the regeneration of osteochondral defects. Overall, new mechanisms of cartilage regeneration by transplanted MSCs were unconcealed in this study. Moreover, we provided a novel experimental basis for cell-free tissue engineering-based cartilage regeneration utilizing apoVs.

Minimally Invasive Therapies for Knee Osteoarthritis

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a musculoskeletal disorder characterized by articular cartilage degeneration and chronic inflammation, affecting one in five people over 40 years old. The purpose of this study was to provide an overview of traditional and novel minimally invasive treatment options and role of artificial intelligence (AI) to streamline the diagnostic process of KOA. This literature review provides insights into the mechanisms of action, efficacy, complications, technical approaches, and recommendations to intra-articular injections (corticosteroids, hyaluronic acid, and plate rich plasma), genicular artery embolization (GAE), and genicular nerve ablation (GNA). Overall, there is mixed evidence to support the efficacy of the intra-articular injections that were covered in this study with varying degrees of supported recommendations through formal medical societies. While GAE and GNA are more novel therapeutic options, preliminary evidence supports their efficacy as a potential minimally invasive therapy for patients with moderate to severe KOA. Furthermore, there is evidentiary support for the use of AI to assist clinicians in the diagnosis and potential selection of treatment options for patients with KOA. In conclusion, there are many exciting advancements within the diagnostic and treatment space of KOA.

Implantation of hUCB-MSCs generates greater hyaline-type cartilage than microdrilling combined with high tibial osteotomy

PURPOSE

To compare the outcomes of treating large cartilage defects in knee osteoarthritis using human allogeneic umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cell (hUCB-MSC) implantation or arthroscopic microdrilling as a supplementary cartilage regenerative procedure combined with high tibial osteotomy (HTO).

METHODS

This 1-year prospective comparative study included 25 patients with large, near full-thickness cartilage defects (International Cartilage Repair Society grade ≥ IIIB) in the medial femoral condyles and varus malalignment. Defects were treated with hUCB-MSC implantation or arthroscopic microdrilling combined with HTO. The primary outcomes were pain visual analogue scale and International Knee Documentation Committee subjective scores at 12, 24 and 48 weeks. Secondary outcomes included arthroscopic, histological and magnetic resonance imaging assessments at 1 year.

RESULTS

Fifteen and 10 patients were treated via hUCB-MSC implantation and microdrilling, respectively. Baseline demographics, limb alignment and clinical outcomes did not significantly differ between the groups. Cartilage defects and total restored areas were significantly larger in the hUCB-MSC group (7.2 ± 1.9 vs. 5.2 ± 2.1 cm2, p = 0.023; 4.5 ± 1.4 vs. 3.0 ± 1.6 cm2, p = 0.035). The proportion of moderate-to-strong positive type II collagen staining was significantly higher in the hUCB-MSC group compared to that in the microdrilled group (93.3% vs. 60%, respectively). Rigidity upon probing resembled that of normal cartilage tissue more in the hUCB-MSC group (86.7% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.075). Histological findings revealed a higher proportion of hyaline cartilage in the group with implanted hUCB-MSC (p = 0.041).

CONCLUSION

hUCB-MSC implantation showed comparable clinical outcomes to those of microdrilling as supplementary cartilage procedures combined with HTO in the short term, despite the significantly larger cartilage defect in the hUCB-MSC group. The repaired cartilage after hUCB-MSC implantation showed greater hyaline-type cartilage with rigidity than that after microdrilling.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, Prospective Comparative Cohort Study.

Protecting the regenerative environment: selecting the optimal delivery vehicle for cartilage repair-a narrative review

Focal cartilage defects are common in youth and older adults, cause significant morbidity and constitute a major risk factor for developing osteoarthritis (OA). OA is the most common musculoskeletal (MSK) disease worldwide, resulting in pain, stiffness, loss of function, and is currently irreversible. Research into the optimal regenerative approach and methods in the setting of either focal cartilage defects and/or OA holds to the ideal of resolving both diseases. The two fundamentals required for cartilage regenerative treatment are 1) the biological element contributing to the regeneration (e.g., direct application of stem cells, or of an exogenous secretome), and 2) the vehicle by which the biological element is suspended and delivered. The vehicle provides support to the regenerative process by providing a protective environment, a structure that allows cell adherence and migration, and a source of growth and regenerative factors that can activate and sustain regeneration. Models of cartilage diseases include osteochondral defect (OCD) (which usually involve one focal lesion), or OA (which involves a more diffuse articular cartilage loss). Given the differing nature of these models, the optimal regenerative strategy to treat different cartilage diseases may not be universal. This could potentially impact the translatability of a successful approach in one condition to that of the other. An analogy would be the repair of a pothole (OCD) versus repaving the entire road (OA). In this narrative review, we explore the existing literature evaluating cartilage regeneration approaches for OCD and OA in animal then in human studies and the vehicles used for each of these two conditions. We then highlight strengths and challenges faced by the different approaches presented and discuss what might constitute the optimal cartilage regenerative delivery vehicle for clinical cartilage regeneration.