Developing an Arrayed CRISPR-Cas9 Co-Culture Screen for Immuno-Oncology Target ID

A co-culture model to study modulators of tumor immune evasion through scalable arrayed CRISPR-interference screens

Cancer cells effectively evade immune surveillance, not only through the well-known PD-1/PD-L1 pathway but also via alternative mechanisms that impair patient response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. We present a novel co-culture model that pairs a reporter T-cell line with different melanoma cell lines that have varying immune evasion characteristics. We developed a scalable high-throughput lentiviral arrayed CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) screening protocol to conduct gene perturbations in both T-cells and melanoma cells, enabling the identification of genes that modulate tumor immune evasion. Our study functionally validates the co-culture model system and demonstrates the performance of the CRISPRi-screening protocol by modulating the expression of known regulators of tumor immunity. Together, our work provides a robust framework for future research aimed at systematically exploring mechanisms of tumor immune evasion.

Rethinking our approach to cancer metabolism to deliver patient benefit

Altered cellular metabolism is a major mechanism by which tumours support nutrient consumption associated with increased cellular proliferation. Selective dependency on specific metabolic pathways provides a therapeutic vulnerability that can be targeted in cancer therapy. Anti-metabolites have been used clinically since the 1940s and several agents targeting nucleotide metabolism are now well established as standard of care treatment in a range of indications. However, despite great progress in our understanding of the metabolic requirements of cancer and non-cancer cells within the tumour microenvironment, there has been limited clinical success for novel agents targeting pathways outside of nucleotide metabolism. We believe that there is significant therapeutic potential in targeting metabolic processes within cancer that is yet to be fully realised. However, current approaches to identify novel targets, test novel therapies and select patient populations most likely to benefit are sub-optimal. We highlight recent advances in technologies and understanding that will support the identification and validation of novel targets, re-evaluation of existing targets and design of optimal clinical positioning strategies to deliver patient benefit.

CRISPR in cancer biology and therapy

Over the past decade, CRISPR has become as much a verb as it is an acronym, transforming biomedical research and providing entirely new approaches for dissecting all facets of cell biology. In cancer research, CRISPR and related tools have offered a window into previously intractable problems in our understanding of cancer genetics, the noncoding genome and tumour heterogeneity, and provided new insights into therapeutic vulnerabilities. Here, we review the progress made in the development of CRISPR systems as a tool to study cancer, and the emerging adaptation of these technologies to improve diagnosis and treatment.

Targeting the DNA damage response in immuno-oncology: developments and opportunities

Immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer treatment and substantially improved patient outcome with regard to multiple tumour types. However, most patients still do not benefit from such therapies, notably because of the absence of pre-existing T cell infiltration. DNA damage response (DDR) deficiency has recently emerged as an important determinant of tumour immunogenicity. A growing body of evidence now supports the concept that DDR-targeted therapies can increase the antitumour immune response by (1) promoting antigenicity through increased mutability and genomic instability, (2) enhancing adjuvanticity through the activation of cytosolic immunity and immunogenic cell death and (3) favouring reactogenicity through the modulation of factors that control the tumour-immune cell synapse. In this Review, we discuss the interplay between the DDR and anticancer immunity and highlight how this dynamic interaction contributes to shaping tumour immunogenicity. We also review the most innovative preclinical approaches that could be used to investigate such effects, including recently developed ex vivo systems. Finally, we highlight the therapeutic opportunities presented by the exploitation of the DDR-anticancer immunity interplay, with a focus on those in early-phase clinical development.