Online screening for excessive daytime sleepiness: a feasibility study

Purpose

Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) can have a significant impact on health and quality of life but may remain undiagnosed due to low awareness and underestimation of the clinical impact of the symptoms. An online screening tool supported by media campaigns might increase awareness and help detect undiagnosed cases of EDS and narcolepsy. The aim of this study was to develop an online screening method, along with a media campaign focusing on EDS, and evaluate its feasibility.

Methods

Online screening supported by a media campaign targeting young and middle-aged adults (18-45 years old) were developed and implemented over a period of 1 year starting from November 2022. The Epworth Sleepiness Scale was used to identify EDS, and the Swiss Narcolepsy Scale was used to identify narcolepsy. In addition, the data on sociodemographic characteristics, selected sleep and health indicators and lifestyle behaviors were collected to indicate the etiology of the EDS. Feasibility, e.g., implementation and practicality, was assessed by the response rate, response to the promotion strategy, time spent on the tool, sample characteristics, and the prevalence of identified EDS and narcolepsy cases.

Results

A total of 2,390 people opened the screening link; 568 of them completed the online screening (23.8%), and most of them (n = 437, 76.9%) left their contact data to receive feedback. We identified 171 (30.1%) respondents at risk of EDS and 61 (10.7%) at risk of narcolepsy. The mean time of the screening was 15 min.

Conclusion

An online screening tool supported with a campaign seems to be a feasible way to increase awareness about EDS and prevent delayed detection of EDS cases.

Challenges in the Management of Narcolepsy in a Resource Limited Setting: A Case Report

The management of Narcolepsy, from the initial presentation to the long-term management and follow-up, remains a challenging endeavor, especially in developing climes. Worldwide, it has been recognized as a medical condition that is frequently associated with initial misdiagnoses, and delays in definitive management, further highlighted, in resource-limited settings like Nigeria where issues are further compounded by social, cultural, and political factors. In this report, we aim to shed some light on the peculiar challenges encountered by clinicians in Nigeria, and in other similar settings, in the process of diagnosis and management of narcolepsy. We present a case of a 17-year-old male teenager with Narcolepsy Type 1 (NT1) who had been previously managed as a case of Juvenile Absence Epilepsy in various centers prior to presentation at our facility. The symptoms began two years prior to presentation at our outpatient clinic, and they were excessive daytime sleepiness, cataplexy, and sleep paralysis. The symptoms were corroborated by laboratory parameters - reduced mean sleep latency (conducted in an improvised sleep laboratory), and a low cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) hypocretin level. The patient was initially placed on Modafinil for excessive daytime sleepiness and a trial of Fluoxetine for the Cataplexy. However, due to the scarcity of Modafinil, behavioral modifications - scheduled sleep naps and sleep hygiene - were eventually employed. Narcolepsy is a debilitating illness, and consequently, the far-reaching effects of these challenges must be understood. It is important that concerted efforts be made towards improving the overall quality of care received by patients from the early identification to the treatment of narcolepsy in the Nigerian healthcare system.

Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Ullanlinna Narcolepsy Scale and Swiss Narcolepsy Scale for screening Japanese individuals with narcolepsy type 1

OBJECTIVE

To validate the Japanese versions of the Ullanlinna Narcolepsy Scale (J-UNS) and Swiss Narcolepsy Scale (J-SNS) for screening narcolepsy in the Japanese population and to discuss strategies for their use in hypersomniac individuals.

METHODS

We selected 451 outpatients with excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) already diagnosed according to the International Classification of Sleep Disorders third edition. They responded to both scales twice at 1-month intervals. After eliminating individuals who met the exclusion criteria, validity and reliability analyses were performed on 408 and 381 participants, respectively.

RESULTS

Patients with narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) displayed higher J-UNS and lower J-SNS scores than those with NT2 and other sleep disorders. The intraclass correlation coefficients and weighted κ coefficient for scale scores in the total participants and patients with NT1 were ≥0.70 and ≥ 0.40, respectively, indicating high reliability. Furthermore, both the sensitivity and specificity of these scales upon using the original cut-off scores (14 for UNS and 0 for SNS) for detecting NT1 were 0.70 or ≥0.70, suggesting high validity. Additionally, the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that the best cut-off score did not change for the J-SNS but that for the J-UNS, it increased to 18. In our study, the scale's sensitivity and specificity changed from 96% to 82% and 58%-78%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Both scales revealed satisfactory screening abilities for NT1 in the Japanese population. However, it may be better to use J-UNS cut-off scores of 18 for a population with EDS.

Clinical and neurophysiological characteristics of 89 patients with narcolepsy and cataplexy from the Russian Narcolepsy Network

STUDY OBJECTIVES

The first reports of narcolepsy with cataplexy in Russia were made by Mankovsky (The pathogenesis of narcolepsy (the case of epidemic encephalitis with cataplexy) published in the Sovremennaya psihonevrologia) in 1925. The largest series of patients (n = 110) was reported by A. Vein (doctoral thesis: Hypersomnia Syndrome) in 1964. However, until today, narcolepsy remained relatively unknown in Russia. The aim of this study is to report clinical and polysomnography (PSG)/multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) results in the Russian population and compare them with the European Narcolepsy Network (EU-NN) data (n = 1099) reported.

METHODS

Eleven sleep centers from Russia agreed to participate and completed a questionnaire including 58 questions concerning demographic, clinical, PSG, and MSLT data.

RESULTS

There were 89 patients with a mean age of 35.6 ± 16.9 years (± here and further indicates standard deviation), 58% males, and 42% females. Narcolepsy started at a mean age of 25.6 ± 14.6 years (range 5-74 years). The mean Epworth Sleepiness Scale score was 18.4 ± 3.5 points (range: 11-24). Sleep paralysis was reported by 59.1%, and hallucinations by 82% of patients. In MSLT, ≥ 2 sleep-onset REM (rapid eye movement) periods (SOREMPs) were found in 81.6%. No center provided human leukocyte antigen (HLA) or cerebral spinal fluid hypocretin data.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical and neurophysiological data from this first study of the Russian Narcolepsy Network suggest a similar profile to the recently reported EU-NN data. The more severe and higher percentage of patients with cataplexy and presenting with both excessive daytime sleepiness and cataplexy may reflect low awareness of narcolepsy in Russia.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05375890; Name: Clinical and Neurophysiological Characteristics of Narcolepsy; Identifier: NCT05375890.

CITATION

Kuts A, Poluektov M, Zakharov A, et al. Clinical and neurophysiological characteristics of 89 patients with narcolepsy and cataplexy from the Russian Narcolepsy Network. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023;19(2):355-359.

Development and Validation of the Pediatric Hypersomnolence Survey

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Narcolepsy and idiopathic hypersomnia usually begin in early adolescence, but diagnostic delays ranging from 5 to 10 years are common, affecting disease burden. To improve early identification of these treatable conditions, we developed and validated the Pediatric Hypersomnolence Survey (PHS).

METHODS

Content was developed through literature review, patient focus groups, interviews with experts in the field, and field testing. We then validated the 14-item self-reported survey across 3 hospitals and web recruitment from patient groups. In the validation phase, we recruited a total of 331 participants (patients with narcolepsy type 1 [n = 64], narcolepsy type 2 [n = 34], idiopathic hypersomnia [n = 36], and other sleep disorders [n = 97] and healthy controls [n = 100], ages 8-18 years) to complete the survey. We assessed a range of psychometric properties, including discriminant diagnostic validity for CNS disorders of hypersomnolence using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and reliability across a 1-week period.

RESULTS

Confirmatory factor analysis indicated a 4-domain solution with good reliability expressed by satisfactory omega values. Across groups, the PHS total score showed appropriate positive correlations with other validated surveys of sleepiness (r = 0.65-0.78, p < 0.001) and negative correlations with multiple sleep latency test measures (mean sleep latency: r = -0.27, p = 0.006; number of sleep-onset REM periods: r = 0.26, p = 0.007). Compared to controls and patients with other sleep disorders, the area under the curve for participants with narcolepsy or idiopathic hypersomnia was 0.87 (standard error 0.02, 95% CI 0.83-0.91) with high sensitivity (81.3, 95% CI 73.7%-87.5%) and specificity (81.2%, 95 CI 75.1%-86.4%). Test-retest reliability was r = 0.87.

DISCUSSION

The PHS is a valid and reliable tool for clinicians to identify pediatric patients with narcolepsy and idiopathic hypersomnia. Implemented in clinical practice, the PHS will potentially decrease diagnostic delays and time to treatment, ultimately reducing disease burden for these debilitating conditions.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class III evidence that the PHS accurately identifies patients with central disorders of hypersomnolence.

The Swiss Primary Hypersomnolence and Narcolepsy Cohort study (SPHYNCS): Study protocol for a prospective, multicentre cohort observational study

Narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) is a disorder with well‐established markers and a suspected autoimmune aetiology. Conversely, the narcoleptic borderland (NBL) disorders, including narcolepsy type 2, idiopathic hypersomnia, insufficient sleep syndrome and hypersomnia associated with a psychiatric disorder, lack well‐defined markers and remain controversial in terms of aetiology, diagnosis and management. The Swiss Primary Hypersomnolence and Narcolepsy Cohort Study (SPHYNCS) is a comprehensive multicentre cohort study, which will investigate the clinical picture, pathophysiology and long‐term course of NT1 and the NBL. The primary aim is to validate new and reappraise well‐known markers for the characterization of the NBL, facilitating the diagnostic process. Seven Swiss sleep centres, belonging to the Swiss Narcolepsy Network (SNaNe), joined the study and will prospectively enrol over 500 patients with recent onset of excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), hypersomnia or a suspected central disorder of hypersomnolence (CDH) during a 3‐year recruitment phase. Healthy controls and patients with EDS due to severe sleep‐disordered breathing, improving after therapy, will represent two control groups of over 50 patients each. Clinical and electrophysiological (polysomnography, multiple sleep latency test, maintenance of wakefulness test) information, and information on psychomotor vigilance and a sustained attention to response task, actigraphy and wearable devices (long‐term monitoring), and responses to questionnaires will be collected at baseline and after 6, 12, 24 and 36 months. Potential disease markers will be searched for in blood, cerebrospinal fluid and stool. Analyses will include quantitative hypocretin measurements, proteomics/peptidomics, and immunological, genetic and microbiota studies. SPHYNCS will increase our understanding of CDH and the relationship between NT1 and the NBL. The identification of new disease markers is expected to lead to better and earlier diagnosis, better prognosis and personalized management of CDH.

The dual orexin receptor antagonist daridorexant does not affect the pharmacokinetics of the BCRP substrate rosuvastatin

Daridorexant is a dual orexin receptor antagonist in clinical development for the treatment of insomnia. Breast-cancer resistant protein (BCRP) is an efflux pump expressed in intestinal epithelium and hepatocytes, contributing to the absorption, distribution, and elimination of drugs and endogenous compounds. In vitro, daridorexant inhibits BCRP with an IC50 of 3.0 μmol/L. The BCRP substrate rosuvastatin is a cholesterol-lowering drug, recommended for clinical drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies. In order to exclude an inhibitory effect of daridorexant on BCRP, this single-centre, open-label, two-treatment Phase 1 study investigated the effect of daridorexant at steady state on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of single-dose rosuvastatin in 20 healthy male subjects. In addition, safety and tolerability were assessed. A single oral dose of 10 mg rosuvastatin on Day 1 was followed by 96 hours observation. Thereafter, 25 mg daridorexant was administered once daily (o.d.) on Days 5-8 and in combination with 10 mg rosuvastatin on Day 8. On Days 9-12, subjects received 25 mg daridorexant alone. PK sampling was performed up to 120 hours after treatment administration. The results showed that concomitant administration of 25 mg daridorexant o.d. at steady state did not affect the exposure parameters of rosuvastatin in a relevant way, as indicated by the ratios of geometric means (GMRs) ([rosuvastatin + daridorexant]/[rosuvastatin alone]) of 0.93 for both Cmax and AUC0-∞ . Administration of a single dose of 10 mg rosuvastatin, multiple doses of 25 mg daridorexant alone or in combination were well tolerated. Taken together, daridorexant and BCRP substrates can be safely co-administered.

Therapy for Cataplexy

Purpose of the review

Cataplexy, an involuntary loss of muscle activity triggered by strong emotions is the most impressive symptom in narcolepsy. This review gives an overview of the current understanding of cataplexy and its available treatment options.

Recent findings

With the discovery of hypocretin/orexin, the understanding of the pathophysiology of cataplexy advanced in the past decades. In the recent years, with the development of new anticataplectic agents (e.g., Pitolisant) symptomatic treatment of cataplexy has further improved. Abrupt cessation of anticataplectic medication especially antidepressants increase the risk of status cataplecticus, a virtually continuous series of long-lasting cataplectic attacks.

Summary

Cataplexies still remain an under-recognized phenomenon due to missing diagnostic measures. Treatment for cataplexy still remains symptomatic but new agents with better tolerability and usability are continuously developed. New therapeutic actions either targeting the autoimmune mechanisms underlying orexin cell death or substituting orexin action are promising treatments for the near future.

Narcolepsy Severity Scale: a reliable tool assessing symptom severity and consequences

Study Objectives

To define clinically relevant Narcolepsy Severity Scale (NSS) score ranges, confirm its main performances and sensitivity to medications, and determine whether items need to be weighted.

Methods

One hundred and forty-three consecutive untreated and 238 treated adults with narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) completed the NSS, a 15-item self-administered questionnaire (score: 0–57) that assesses the severity and consequences of the five major narcolepsy symptoms such as daytime sleepiness, cataplexy, hallucinations, sleep paralysis, and disturbed nighttime sleep (DNS). They also completed the Epworth Sleepiness scale (ESS; daytime sleepiness), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI; depressive symptoms), and EQ5D (quality of life).

Results

The mean symptom number (4.3 vs 3.5), NSS total score (33.3 ± 9.4 vs 24.3 ± 10.2), and number of narcolepsy symptoms (five symptoms: 53.1% vs 24.8%; four symptoms: 26.6% vs 22.7%; three symptoms: 15.4% vs 32.4%; two symptoms: 4.9% vs 20.2%) were significantly different between untreated and treated patients (p &lt; 0.0001). DNS was often the third symptom (95.5 per cent). The symptom number was associated with diagnosis delay, age at onset, and ESS and BDI scores. Comparisons with ESS, BDI and EQ5D showed that NSS item weighting was not necessary to highlight between-group differences. Four NSS severity levels were defined (mild, moderate, severe, and very severe) with between-group differences related to treatment. The probability of having ESS ≥ 16, BDI ≥ 20, and EQ-5D &lt; 60 increased with the severity level.

Conclusion

NSS is valid, reliable, and responsive to treatment in patients with NT1, with four clinically relevant severity score ranges provided. NSS has adequate clinimetric properties for broadening its use for both clinic and research.

Narcolepsy in Children and Adults: A Guide to Improved Recognition, Diagnosis and Management

Narcolepsy is a rare condition that affects children and adults, and commonly has an onset in childhood. Time to appropriate diagnosis frequently is at least a decade. Unrecognized or misdiagnosed symptoms of narcolepsy contribute to increased morbidity, disability and socioeconomic liability in these patients. Delays in diagnosis may be related to variability in presentation in childhood, lack of familiarity with symptoms or appropriate diagnostic testing or misdiagnosis with accidental introduction of treatment that may modify or mask narcolepsy features. Improved awareness about the diagnosis and tailored therapies improve clinical and socioeconomic outcomes by reducing time to effective treatment. Application of effective treatment results in long-term benefits by improving clinical outcomes, potentially enabling improved education, increased employment opportunity, and improved work productivity and quality of life. This review provides a comprehensive stepwise approach to improve knowledge and comfort for recognition of symptoms, diagnostic strategies and management considerations of narcolepsy in children and adults.