Audiologic Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Cochlear Malformations: A Comparative Analysis of Lateral Wall and Perimodiolar Electrode Arrays

OBJECTIVE

Cochlear implantation in children with inner ear malformations has been shown to be beneficial. The aims of this study are to evaluate open set word recognition outcomes among children with cochlear implants who have cochlear malformations, and to further assess if either the lateral wall (LW) or perimodiolar (PM) electrode arrays confer any performance outcome advantages.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Pediatric cochlear implant recipients with cochlear malformations who were implanted at our institution within the last 10 years and had speech perception scores were eligible for inclusion in the study. Potential participants were excluded if they had less than 1 year of listening experience with the cochlear implant or suspected cochlear nerve deficiency.

INTERVENTION

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Most recent consonant-nucleus-consonant word score.

RESULTS

ANOVA analysis demonstrated that the type of cochlear malformation was significantly associated with speech perception outcome (p = 0.006). Those with IP2 malformations had significantly better word recognition outcomes than the remaining cochlear malformations. Array type (LW or PM) was not associated with better word recognition outcomes in long-term follow-up of patients with IP2 malformations (p = 0.13).

CONCLUSIONS

In children who have cochlear malformations, cochlear implantation results in varying word recognition outcomes based on the type of malformation. While the participants in this study demonstrated postoperative open set word recognition skills, those with IP2 malformations demonstrated the most benefit. Electrode type was not found to significantly impact outcomes in this cohort.

Effectiveness of cochlear implant in inner ear bone malformations with anterior labyrinth involvement

OBJECTIVE

To study electrical stimulation, auditory functionality, and language development in patients with inner ear malformations involving the anterior labyrinth who underwent cochlear implantation.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case review.

SETTING

Reference hospital for cochlear implantation.

PATIENTS

Review of 14 cases of severe hearing loss with major (common cavity deformity and cochlear hypoplasia) or minor (e.g., incomplete partition and basal turn aplasia) malformations.

INTERVENTIONS

After cochlear implantation, data were gathered on the threshold (THR) and maximum comfort level (MCL) of the electrical stimulation and the number of functioning electrodes. Auditory responses to speech (EARS protocol) subtests were used to evaluate auditory functionality and language acquisition at 6, 12, and 24 months post-implantation. Tests used were: LIP profile, MTP (3, 6 and 12 words), OLD (open set test) and CLD (close set test). Results were compared with findings in a control group of 28 cochlear implantation patients without these malformations and with congenital hearing loss.

RESULTS

The mean THR was 11.02μC in patients with malformations versus 3.5μC in those without, a significant difference. The THR also significantly differed between groups with major and minor malformations. Fewer functioning electrodes were used in patients with malformations. Auditory functionality scores were best in controls than in patients with malformations, who scored ≤50%, finding the lowest scores in those with major malformations.

CONCLUSION

Patients with inner ear malformations undergoing cochlear implantation require greater stimuli to obtain an auditory response and have worse auditory functionality outcomes; these differences are greater in those with major versus minor malformations Nevertheless, cochlear implantation appears to be beneficial for all patients with these malformations to a greater or lesser extent.