1
|
Hagmann SHF, Hodle T, Brennan M, Szczerba F, Camelo IY, Beachy J, Horton ER. Cefazolin and Carbapenem Combination to Treat Persistent Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia in Preterm Infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2024; 43:145-148. [PMID: 37922486 DOI: 10.1097/inf.0000000000004155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2023]
Abstract
Encouraged by bacteremia clearance using antistaphylococcal beta-lactams plus carbapenem combination in adults with refractory methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus infection, we present our experience with 2 preterm infants and review 1 previously published case. Noted successful bacteremia clearance in all 3 must be weighed against possible adverse effects associated with carbapenem use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan H F Hagmann
- From the Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Baystate Children's Hospital, Springfield, Massachusetts
| | - Taylor Hodle
- Department of Pharmacy Services, Baystate Health, Springfield, Massachusetts
| | - Maura Brennan
- Department of Pharmacy Services, Baystate Health, Springfield, Massachusetts
| | - Frank Szczerba
- Department of Pharmacy Services, Baystate Health, Springfield, Massachusetts
| | - Ingrid Y Camelo
- Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Children's Hospital of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia
| | - Joanna Beachy
- Division of Neonatal Medicine, Baystate Children's Hospital, Springfield, Massachusetts
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School-Baystate Health, Springfield, Massachusetts
| | - Evan R Horton
- Department of Pharmacy Services, Baystate Health, Springfield, Massachusetts
- Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Worcester, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Developmental Pharmacokinetics of Antibiotics Used in Neonatal ICU: Focus on Preterm Infants. Biomedicines 2023; 11:biomedicines11030940. [PMID: 36979919 PMCID: PMC10046592 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11030940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Neonatal Infections are among the most common reasons for admission to the intensive care unit. Neonatal sepsis (NS) significantly contributes to mortality rates. Empiric antibiotic therapy of NS recommended by current international guidelines includes benzylpenicillin, ampicillin/amoxicillin, and aminoglycosides (gentamicin). The rise of antibacterial resistance precipitates the growth of the use of antibiotics of the Watch (second, third, and fourth generations of cephalosporines, carbapenems, macrolides, glycopeptides, rifamycins, fluoroquinolones) and Reserve groups (fifth generation of cephalosporines, oxazolidinones, lipoglycopeptides, fosfomycin), which are associated with a less clinical experience and higher risks of toxic reactions. A proper dosing regimen is essential for effective and safe antibiotic therapy, but its choice in neonates is complicated with high variability in the maturation of organ systems affecting drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion. Changes in antibiotic pharmacokinetic parameters result in altered efficacy and safety. Population pharmacokinetics can help to prognosis outcomes of antibiotic therapy, but it should be considered that the neonatal population is heterogeneous, and this heterogeneity is mainly determined by gestational and postnatal age. Preterm neonates are common in clinical practice, and due to the different physiology compared to the full terms, constitute a specific neonatal subpopulation. The objective of this review is to summarize the evidence about the developmental changes (specific for preterm and full-term infants, separately) of pharmacokinetic parameters of antibiotics used in neonatal intensive care units.
Collapse
|
3
|
Cao G, Zhou P, Zhang H, Sun B, Tong X, Xing Y. Extended Infusion of Meropenem in Neonatal Sepsis: A Historical Cohort Study. Antibiotics (Basel) 2022; 11:antibiotics11030341. [PMID: 35326804 PMCID: PMC8944670 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11030341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2022] [Revised: 03/02/2022] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
This single-center historical cohort study investigated the effectiveness and safety of extended infusion (EI) compared with short-term infusion (STI) of meropenem in neonatal sepsis. Patient electronic health records from Peking University Third Hospital (1 December 2011−1 April 2021) were screened. Neonates diagnosed with sepsis and treated with meropenem in the neonatal intensive care unit were included (256 patients) as STI (0.5 h, 129 patients) and EI (2−3 h, 127 patients) groups. Three-day clinical effectiveness and three-day microbial clearance were considered the main outcomes. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. EI of meropenem was associated with a significantly higher 3-day clinical effectiveness rate (0.335 (0.180, 0.623), p = 0.001) and 3-day microbial clearance (4.127 (1.235, 13.784), p = 0.021) than STI, with comparable safety. Subgroup analyses showed that neonates with very low birth weight benefited from EI in terms of 3-day clinical effectiveness rate (75.6% versus 56.6%, p = 0.007), with no significant difference in the 3-day clinical effectiveness (85.1% versus 78.3%, p = 0.325) and microbial clearance (6% versus 5%, p > 0.999) rates between 3 h and 2 h infusions. Thus, EI of meropenem may be associated with better effectiveness and comparable safety in treating neonatal sepsis than STI. Nonetheless, historically analyzed safety evaluation might be biased, and these findings need confirmation in randomized controlled trials of larger sample sizes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guangna Cao
- Department of Pediatrics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China;
| | - Pengxiang Zhou
- Department of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China;
- Peking University Health Science Center, Institute for Drug Evaluation, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Hua Zhang
- Research Center of Clinical Epidemiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China;
| | - Bangkai Sun
- Information Management and Big Data Center, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China;
| | - Xiaomei Tong
- Department of Pediatrics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China;
- Correspondence: (X.T.); (Y.X.); Tel.: +86-010-8226-7671 (X.T.); +86-010-8226-7677 (Y.X.)
| | - Yan Xing
- Department of Pediatrics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China;
- Correspondence: (X.T.); (Y.X.); Tel.: +86-010-8226-7671 (X.T.); +86-010-8226-7677 (Y.X.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dao K, Fuchs A, André P, Giannoni E, Decosterd LA, Marchetti O, Asner SA, Pfister M, Widmer N, Buclin T, Csajka C, Guidi M. Dosing strategies of imipenem in neonates based on pharmacometric modelling and simulation. J Antimicrob Chemother 2021; 77:457-465. [PMID: 34791295 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkab394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Imipenem is a broad-spectrum antibacterial agent used in critically ill neonates after failure of first-line treatments. Few studies have described imipenem disposition in this population. The objectives of our study were: (i) to characterize imipenem population pharmacokinetics (PK) in a cohort of neonates; and (ii) to conduct model-based simulations to evaluate the performance of six different dosing regimens aiming at optimizing PK target attainment. METHODS A total of 173 plasma samples from 82 neonates were collected over 15 years at the Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland. The majority of study subjects were preterm neonates with a median gestational age (GA) of 27 weeks (range: 24-41), a postnatal age (PNA) of 21 days (2-153) and a body weight (BW) of 1.16 kg (0.5-4.1). PK data were analysed using non-linear mixed-effect modelling (NONMEM). RESULTS A one-compartment model best characterized imipenem disposition. Population PK parameters estimates of CL and volume of distribution were 0.21 L/h and 0.73 L, with an interpatient variability (CV%) of 20.1% on CL in a representative neonate (GA 27 weeks, PNA 21 days, BW 1.16 kg, serum creatinine, SCr 46.6 μmol/L). GA and PNA exhibited the greatest impact on PK parameters, followed by SCr. These covariates explained 36% and 15% of interindividual variability in CL, respectively.Simulated regimens using a dose of 20-25 mg/kg every 6-12 h according to postnatal age led to the highest PTA (T>MIC over 100% of time). CONCLUSIONS Dosing adjustment according to BW, GA and PNA optimizes imipenem exposure in neonates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim Dao
- Service of Clinical Pharmacology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Aline Fuchs
- Service of Clinical Pharmacology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Pascal André
- Service of Clinical Pharmacology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Eric Giannoni
- Clinic of Neonatology, Department Mother-Woman-Child, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Laurent A Decosterd
- Innovation and Development Laboratory, Service of Clinical Pharmacology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Oscar Marchetti
- Service of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.,Department of Medicine, Ensemble Hospitalier de la Côte, Morges, Switzerland
| | - Sandra A Asner
- Pediatric Infectious Disease and Vaccinology Unit, Department Mother-Woman-Child, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Marc Pfister
- Pediatric Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, University of Basel Children's Hospital, UKBB, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Widmer
- Service of Clinical Pharmacology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.,Pharmacy of the Eastern Vaud Hospitals, Rennaz, Switzerland.,Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Western Switzerland, University of Geneva, University of Lausanne, Geneva, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Thierry Buclin
- Service of Clinical Pharmacology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Chantal Csajka
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Western Switzerland, University of Geneva, University of Lausanne, Geneva, Lausanne, Switzerland.,Center for Research and Innovation in Clinical Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.,School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Monia Guidi
- Service of Clinical Pharmacology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.,Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Western Switzerland, University of Geneva, University of Lausanne, Geneva, Lausanne, Switzerland.,Center for Research and Innovation in Clinical Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Akers SM, Kinney K, Butcher MI, Moïse A. Clearance of Persistent Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia in a Preterm Neonate With the Use of Combination Cefazolin and Ertapenem. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther 2020; 25:547-551. [PMID: 32839659 DOI: 10.5863/1551-6776-25.6.547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Late-onset sepsis caused by Staphylococcus aureus is a serious and relatively common complication encountered by preterm neonates in NICUs. Typical treatment regimens for invasive methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) include semisynthetic beta lactam antibiotics, such as nafcillin. This report describes the first use of a combination of cefazolin and ertapenem to successfully treat persistent MSSA bacteremia in a preterm neonate who failed traditional first-line therapy.
Collapse
|
6
|
Lutsar I, Chazallon C, Trafojer U, de Cabre VM, Auriti C, Bertaina C, Calo Carducci FI, Canpolat FE, Esposito S, Fournier I, Hallik M, Heath PT, Ilmoja ML, Iosifidis E, Kuznetsova J, Meyer L, Metsvaht T, Mitsiakos G, Pana ZD, Mosca F, Pugni L, Roilides E, Rossi P, Sarafidis K, Sanchez L, Sharland M, Usonis V, Warris A, Aboulker JP, Giaquinto C. Meropenem vs standard of care for treatment of neonatal late onset sepsis (NeoMero1): A randomised controlled trial. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0229380. [PMID: 32130261 PMCID: PMC7055900 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2018] [Accepted: 02/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The early use of broad-spectrum antibiotics remains the cornerstone for the treatment of neonatal late onset sepsis (LOS). However, which antibiotics should be used is still debatable, as relevant studies were conducted more than 20 years ago, recruited in single centres or countries, evaluated antibiotics not in clinical use anymore and had variable inclusion/exclusion criteria and outcome measures. Moreover, antibiotic-resistant bacteria have become a major problem in many countries worldwide. We hypothesized that efficacy of meropenem as a broad-spectrum antibiotic is superior to standard of care regimens (SOC) in empiric treatment of LOS and aimed to compare meropenem to SOC in infants aged <90 days with LOS. Methods and findings NeoMero-1 was a randomized, open-label, phase III superiority trial conducted in 18 neonatal units in 6 countries. Infants with post-menstrual age (PMA) of ≤44 weeks with positive blood culture and one, or those with negative culture and at least with two predefined clinical and laboratory signs suggestive of LOS, or those with PMA >44 weeks meeting the Goldstein criteria of sepsis, were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive meropenem or one of the two SOC regimens (ampicillin+gentamicin or cefotaxime+gentamicin) chosen by each site prior to the start of the study for 8–14 days. The primary outcome was treatment success (survival, no modification of allocated therapy, resolution/improvement of clinical and laboratory markers, no need of additional antibiotics and presumed/confirmed eradication of pathogens) at test-of-cure visit (TOC) in full analysis set. Stool samples were tested at baseline and Day 28 for meropenem-resistant Gram-negative organisms (CRGNO). The primary analysis was performed in all randomised patients and in patients with culture confirmed LOS. Proportions of participants with successful outcome were compared by using a logistic regression model adjusted for the stratification factors. From September 3, 2012 to November 30th 2014, total of 136 patients (instead of planned 275) in each arm were randomized; 140 (52%) were culture positive. Successful outcome at TOC was achieved in 44/136 (32%) in the meropenem arm vs. 31/135 (23%) in the SOC arm (p = 0.087). The respective numbers in patients with positive cultures were 17/63 (27%) vs. 10/77 (13%) (p = 0.022). The main reason of failure was modification of allocated therapy. Treatment emergent adverse events occurred in 72% and serious adverse events in 17% of patients, the Day 28 mortality was 6%. Cumulative acquisition of CRGNO by Day 28 occurred in 4% of patients in the meropenem and 12% in the SOC arm (p = 0.052). Conclusions Within this study population, we found no evidence that meropenem was superior to SOC in terms of success at TOC, short term hearing disturbances, safety or mortality were similar in both treatment arms but the study was underpowered to detect the planned effect. Meropenem treatment did not select for colonization with CRGNOs. We suggest that meropenem as broad-spectrum antibiotic should be reserved for neonates who are more likely to have Gram-negative LOS, especially in NICUs where microorganisms producing extended spectrum- and AmpC type beta-lactamases are circulating.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irja Lutsar
- Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
- * E-mail:
| | | | - Ursula Trafojer
- Women's and Children's Health Department, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera-University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Cinzia Auriti
- Department of Neonatology, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Chiara Bertaina
- University Department of Paediatrics, Immunological and Infectious Disease Unit, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Ippolita Calo Carducci
- University Department of Paediatrics, Immunological and Infectious Disease Unit, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Fuat Emre Canpolat
- Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Zekai Tahir Burak Kadın Sağlığı Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Neonatoloji Kliniği, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Susanna Esposito
- Pediatric Highly Intensive Care Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Maarja Hallik
- Department of Intensive Care, Tallinn Children’s Hospital, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - Paul T. Heath
- Paediatric Infectious Disease Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mari-Liis Ilmoja
- Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
- Department of Intensive Care, Tallinn Children’s Hospital, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - Elias Iosifidis
- 3 Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Infectious Diseases Unit, Aristotle University School of Health Sciences, Hippokration Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Jelena Kuznetsova
- Tartu University Hospital, Clinic of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Tartu, Estonia
| | | | - Tuuli Metsvaht
- Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
- Tartu University Hospital, Clinic of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Tartu, Estonia
| | - George Mitsiakos
- 2 Department of Neonatology, Faculty of Medicine, Aristotle University School of Health Sciences, Papageorgiou Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Zoi Dorothea Pana
- 3 Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Infectious Diseases Unit, Aristotle University School of Health Sciences, Hippokration Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Fabio Mosca
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenza Pugni
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Emmanuel Roilides
- 3 Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Infectious Diseases Unit, Aristotle University School of Health Sciences, Hippokration Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Paolo Rossi
- University Department of Paediatrics, Immunological and Infectious Disease Unit, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Kosmas Sarafidis
- 1st Department of Neonatology, Faculty of Medicine, Aristotle University School of Health Sciences, Hippokration Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Laura Sanchez
- Hospital Universitario Infantil LA PAZ- H. Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Michael Sharland
- Paediatric Infectious Disease Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Adilia Warris
- MRC Centre for Medical Mycology, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| | | | - Carlo Giaquinto
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Şah İpek M. Neonatal Bacterial Meningitis. NEONATAL MEDICINE 2019. [DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.87118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
|
8
|
Di Mauro A, Cortese F, Laforgia N, Pantaleo B, Giuliani R, Bonifazi D, Ciccone MM, Giordano P. Neonatal bacterial meningitis: a systematic review of European available data. Minerva Pediatr 2017; 71:201-208. [PMID: 29160642 DOI: 10.23736/s0026-4946.17.05124-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite advances in neonatal intensive care and the improvements in surveillance, prevention and vaccination programs, neonatal meningitis still represents an important cause of morbidity and mortality in infants, with the highest mortality in the newborn population. The aim of this article was to summarize current knowledge about this topic with particular attention to management of neonatal meningitis in order to provide a useful tool for clinicians. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We reviewed the existent literature from five European Countries (France, German, Italy, Spain and UK) on the effectiveness of treatments for bacterial meningitis in newborns taking into consideration the antibiotic resistance phenomenon. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS There are few data available on this topic; bacterial neonatal meningitis treatment and management is currently based more on experience than on high quality evidences. CONCLUSIONS Identification of the knowledge gaps may stimulate researchers to design new studies aiming to better define management strategies of bacterial meningitis in newborns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Di Mauro
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Francesca Cortese
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy -
| | - Nicola Laforgia
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Beatrice Pantaleo
- Consortium for Biological and Pharmacological Evaluation, Bari, Italy
| | - Rachele Giuliani
- Consortium for Biological and Pharmacological Evaluation, Bari, Italy
| | - Donato Bonifazi
- Consortium for Biological and Pharmacological Evaluation, Bari, Italy
| | - Marco M Ciccone
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Paola Giordano
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rivera-Chaparro ND, Cohen-Wolkowiez M, Greenberg RG. Dosing antibiotics in neonates: review of the pharmacokinetic data. Future Microbiol 2017; 12:1001-1016. [PMID: 28758800 PMCID: PMC5627030 DOI: 10.2217/fmb-2017-0058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2016] [Accepted: 05/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Antibiotics are often used in neonates despite the absence of relevant dosing information in drug labels. For neonatal dosing, clinicians must extrapolate data from studies for adults and older children, who have strikingly different physiologies. As a result, dosing extrapolation can lead to increased toxicity or efficacy failures in neonates. Driven by these differences and recent legislation mandating the study of drugs in children and neonates, an increasing number of pharmacokinetic studies of antibiotics are being performed in neonates. These studies have led to new dosing recommendations with particular consideration for neonate body size and maturation. Herein, we highlight the available pharmacokinetic data for commonly used systemic antibiotics in neonates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nazario D Rivera-Chaparro
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, 2400 Pratt Street, Durham, NC 27705, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, 2400 Pratt Street, Durham, NC 27705, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Rachel G Greenberg
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, 2400 Pratt Street, Durham, NC 27705, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Conventional Versus Prolonged Infusion of Meropenem in Neonates With Gram-negative Late-onset Sepsis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2017; 36:358-363. [PMID: 27918382 DOI: 10.1097/inf.0000000000001445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gram-negative bacteria are associated with significant morbidity and mortality in preterm and term newborns. Meropenem has widespread efficacy and often allows for monotherapy in this group. Prolonged infusion instead of infusion over 30 minutes has been suggested to result in higher microbiologic efficacy. OBJECTIVE To compare the clinical and microbiologic efficacy and safety of prolonged infusions versus conventional dosing of meropenem in neonates with Gram-negative late-onset sepsis (GN-LOS). METHODS A prospective, randomized clinical trial was conducted in neonates with GN-LOS admitted to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), Mansoura University Children's Hospital, between August 2013 and June 2015. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous infusion of meropenem over 4 hours (infusion group) or 30 minutes (conventional group) at a dosing regimen of 20 mg/kg/dose every 8 hours and 40 mg/kg/dose every 8 hours in meningitis and Pseudomonas infection. Clinical and microbiologic success in eradication of infection were the primary outcomes. Neonatal mortality, meropenem-related (MR) duration of mechanical ventilation, MR length of NICU stay, total length of NICU stay, duration of respiratory support (RS), duration of mechanical ventilation, MR duration of inotropes and adverse effects were secondary outcomes. RESULTS A total of 102 infants (51 in each group) were recruited. The infusion group demonstrated a significantly higher rate of clinical improvement and microbiologic eradication 7 days after starting meropenem therapy compared with the conventional group. Mortality and duration of RS were significantly less in the infusion group compared with conventional group. Acute kidney injury after meropenem treatment was significantly less in the infusion group compared with the conventional group. CONCLUSIONS Prolonged infusion of meropenem in neonates with GN-LOS is associated with higher clinical improvement, microbiologic eradication, less neonatal mortality, shorter duration of RS and less acute kidney injury compared with the conventional strategy.
Collapse
|
11
|
Open-Label Study To Evaluate the Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Doripenem in Infants Less than 12 Weeks in Chronological Age. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2015; 59:4742-9. [PMID: 26014957 DOI: 10.1128/aac.00485-15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2015] [Accepted: 05/22/2015] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Doripenem, a parenteral carbapenem with broad-spectrum activity against aerobic Gram-negative and Gram-positive and anaerobic pathogens, is currently approved for use in adults in the United States and European Union. Single-dose doripenem pharmacokinetics in 52 infants <12 weeks in chronological age were investigated in this phase 1 study. Hospitalized, medically stable infants <12 weeks in chronological age were stratified into 6 groups based on chronological and gestational age designed to reflect increasing renal maturation and decreasing volume of distribution (Vz) for β-lactam antimicrobials during the first 3 months of life. Subjects received single-dose doripenem (5 mg/kg of body weight for <8 weeks and 8 mg/kg for ≥8 weeks in chronological age) administered intravenously over 1 h. Plasma samples were obtained immediately before the end of the infusion and 1.5, 3, and 7 h after the start of the infusion. Urine was obtained by indwelling catheter during the 8 h following infusion. Doripenem showed linear pharmacokinetics across the 6 age groups. Neonates (<4 weeks in chronological age) had increased mean exposure (area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinite time [AUC∞], 45.7 versus 32.4 μg · h/ml), longer elimination half-life (2.98 versus 1.79 h), and lower clearance (2.03 versus 3.03 ml/min/kg) compared with infants >4 weeks. Mean Vz was highest in subjects with the earliest gestational age (<32 weeks): 0.564 liter/kg for neonates and 0.548 liter/kg for infants. Single-dose pharmacokinetics of doripenem administered as a 1-hour infusion in term and preterm infants <12 weeks in chronological age were similar to what has been observed in neonates and very young infants with other carbapenems. Single-dose doripenem was generally safe and well tolerated. (This study has been registered with ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01381848 and with EudraCT under registration no. 2009-014387-20.).
Collapse
|
12
|
Neonatal infections due to multi-resistant strains: Epidemiology, current treatment, emerging therapeutic approaches and prevention. Clin Chim Acta 2015; 451:71-7. [PMID: 25749408 DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2015.02.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2014] [Revised: 02/19/2015] [Accepted: 02/22/2015] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Severe infections represent the main cause of neonatal mortality accounting for more than one million neonatal deaths worldwide every year. Antibiotics are the most commonly prescribed medications in neonatal intensive care units. The benefits of antibiotic therapy when indicated are clearly enormous, but the continued and widespread use of antibiotics has generated over the years a strong selective pressure on microorganisms, favoring the emergence of resistant strains. Health agencies worldwide are galvanizing attention toward antibiotic resistance in gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Infections in neonatal units due to multidrug and extensively multidrug resistant bacteria are rising and are already seriously challenging antibiotic treatment options. While there is a growing choice of agents against multi-resistant gram-positive bacteria, new options for multi-resistant gram-negative bacteria in the clinical practice have decreased significantly in the last 20 years making the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant pathogens challenging mostly in neonates. Treatment options are currently limited and will be some years before any new treatment for neonates become available for clinical use, if ever. The aim of the review is to highlight the current knowledge on antibiotic resistance in the neonatal population, the possible therapeutic choices, and the prevention strategies to adopt in order to reduce the emergency and spread of resistant strains.
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
The choice of antibiotics for serious Gram-negative bacterial infections in the newborn must balance delivery of effective antibiotics to the site(s) of infection with the need to minimize selection of antibiotic resistance. To reduce the risk of selective pressure from large-scale cephalosporin usage, a penicillin-aminoglycoside combination is recommended as empiric therapy for neonatal sepsis. Where Gram-negative sepsis is strongly suspected or proven, a third-generation cephalosporin should ordinarily replace penicillin. Piperacillin-tazobactam can provide better Gram-negative cover than penicillin-aminoglycoside combinations, without the risk of selecting antibiotic resistance seen with cephalosporins, but further clinical studies are required before this approach to empiric therapy can be recommended. For antibiotic-resistant infections, a carbapenem remains the mainstay of treatment. However, rapid emergence and spread of resistance to these antibiotics means that in the future, neonatologists may have to rely on antibiotics such as colistin, whose pharmacokinetics, safety, and clinical efficacy in neonates are not well-defined.
Collapse
|