A closer look at vancomycin, teicoplanin, and antimicrobial resistance

Continuous versus intermittent infusion of vancomycin in adult patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Continuous infusion of vancomycin (CIV) and intermittent infusion of vancomycin (IIV) are two major administration strategies in clinical settings. However, previous articles comparing the efficacy and safety of CIV versus IIV showed inconsistent results. Therefore, a meta-analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of CIV and IIV. PubMed, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science up to June 2015 were searched using the keywords 'vancomycin', 'intravenous', 'parenteral', 'continuous', 'intermittent', 'discontinuous', 'infusion', 'administration' and 'dosing'. Eleven studies were included in the meta-analysis. Neither heterogeneity nor publication bias were observed. Patients treated with CIV had a significantly lower incidence of nephrotoxicity compared with patients receiving IIV [risk ratio (RR)=0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-0.80; P<0.001]. No significant difference in treatment failure between the two groups was detected. Mortality between patients receiving CIV and patients receiving IIV was similar (RR=1.15, 95% CI 0.85-1.54; P=0.365). This meta-analysis showed that CIV had superior safety compared with IIV, whilst the clinical efficacy was not significantly different. A further multicentre, randomised controlled trial is required to confirm these results.

Factors affecting the cost effectiveness of antibiotics

In an era of spiraling health care costs and limited resources, policy makers and health care payers are concerned about the cost effectiveness of antibiotics. The aim of this study is to draw on published economic evaluations with a view to identify and illustrate the factors affecting the cost effectiveness of antibiotic treatment of bacterial infections. The findings indicate that the cost effectiveness of antibiotics is influenced by factors relating to the characteristics and the use of antibiotics (i.e., diagnosis, comparative costs and comparative effectiveness, resistance, patient compliance with treatment, and treatment failure) and by external factors (i.e., funding source, clinical pharmacy interventions, and guideline implementation interventions). Physicians need to take into account these factors when prescribing an antibiotic and assess whether a specific antibiotic treatment adds sufficient value to justify its costs.

Factors affecting the cost effectiveness of antibiotics

In an era of spiraling health care costs and limited resources, policy makers and health care payers are concerned about the cost effectiveness of antibiotics. The aim of this study is to draw on published economic evaluations with a view to identify and illustrate the factors affecting the cost effectiveness of antibiotic treatment of bacterial infections. The findings indicate that the cost effectiveness of antibiotics is influenced by factors relating to the characteristics and the use of antibiotics (i.e., diagnosis, comparative costs and comparative effectiveness, resistance, patient compliance with treatment, and treatment failure) and by external factors (i.e., funding source, clinical pharmacy interventions, and guideline implementation interventions). Physicians need to take into account these factors when prescribing an antibiotic and assess whether a specific antibiotic treatment adds sufficient value to justify its costs.

Management of complicated infections in the era of antimicrobial resistance: the role of tigecycline

BACKGROUND

Increasing antimicrobial resistance and infection complications pose challenges to optimal antibiotic therapy. Paucity of new antibiotics (and the eventual bacterial resistance they face) highlights the critical need for more appropriate use of broadly effective agents, which may help to thwart the dramatic rise in global resistance. Single agents that can be combined effectively with others, if needed, promise the simplest overall utility. Approved in 2005 to treat complicated skin and intra-abdominal infections, tigecycline is a novel extended-spectrum minocycline derivative that circumvents bacterial resistance, as it is unaffected by efflux pumps and ribosomal protection. However, tigecycline should not be used as empiric monotherapy for treatment of health-care associated infections known or suspected to be owing to Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Proteus spp.

OBJECTIVE

This article summarizes the demonstrated clinical utility of tigecycline so far.

METHODS

A MEDLINE search examined authoritative published clinical studies, reviews and case reports detailing the clinical record of tigecycline since 2004.

RESULTS/CONCLUSION

Tigecycline continues to maintain satisfactory profiles of safety, efficacy and antimicrobial resistance avoidance. Regardless, continued surveillance is needed to detect reduced susceptibility and resistance against both community and nosocomial pathogens. Judicious use of agents reserved for multidrug resistant pathogens is vital to preserve their effectiveness.

Role of quinupristin/dalfopristin in the treatment of Gram-positive nosocomial infections in haematological or oncological patients

Gram-positive pathogens, primarily Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci, viridans group streptococci, and enterococci, are now the predominant causes of infection in neutropenic haematology/oncology patients, but are often resistant to multiple antibiotics. Glycopeptides have been the only alternative antibiotic treatments for multidrug-resistant Gram-positive infections to date. However, glycopeptides are not always effective or well tolerated, and can produce nephrotoxic or ototoxic effects. Quinupristin/dalfopristin is a recently introduced streptogramin antibiotic that is active in vitro against most of the major Gram-positive pathogens causing infection in neutropenic patients. Recent studies of the in vitro susceptibility of clinical isolates of Gram-positive pathogens to quinupristin/dalfopristin are summarized. Pre-clinical and clinical studies of the efficacy and safety of quinupristin/dalfopristin in the treatment of Gram-positive infections are reviewed. Quinupristin/dalfopristin is active in vitro against the vast majority of recent isolates of relevant Gram-positive pathogens, including methicillin-resistant staphylococci, viridans group streptococci, and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium, but excluding Enterococcus faecalis. Pre-clinical and clinical data indicate the efficacy of quinupristin/dalfopristin in infections caused by these organisms, including bacteraemia and catheter-related infections. Quinupristin/dalfopristin is not associated with nephrotoxicity or ototoxicity. Quinupristin/dalfopristin is a potential alternative to glycopeptides in haematology or oncology patients with multidrug-resistant Gram-positive infections, especially those who are unresponsive to, or intolerant of, glycopeptides.

Combinatorial glycosylation of glycopeptide antibiotics

The glycosyltransferases GtfE and GtfD from the vancomycin producer Amycolatopsis orientalis have promiscuous substrate and NDP-sugar specificities. They have been used to generate novel glycopeptide antibiotics containing the heptapeptide scaffolds of vancomycin and teichoplanin.

Determination of bone and tissue concentrations of teicoplanin mixed with hydroxyapatite cement to repair cortical defects

A highly specific and sensitive isocratic reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method for the determination of the major component of teicoplanin in tissue is reported. Comparing fluorescamine and o-phthalaldehyde (OPA) as derivatizing agents, the derivative formed with the latter exhibits superior fluorescence intensity allowing detection of femtomole quantities. Pretreatment for tissue samples is by solid-phase extraction which uses Bakerbond PolarP C(18) cartridges and gives effective clean up from endogenous by-products. Linearity was given from 0.6 to 100 ng per injection. The coefficient of variation did not exceed 5.8% for both interday and intraday assays. It was found that when bone defects are repaired with a hydroxyapatite-teicoplanin mixture, the antibiotic does not degrade, even when it is in the cement for several months. The stability of teicoplanin in bone cement was determined fluorodensitometrically.

Direct interaction of a vancomycin derivative with bacterial enzymes involved in cell wall biosynthesis

BACKGROUND

The glycopeptide antibiotic vancomycin complexes DAla-DAla termini of bacterial cell walls and peptidoglycan precursors and interferes with enzymes involved in murein biosynthesis. Semisynthetic vancomycins incorporating hydrophobic sugar substituents exhibit efficacy against DAla-DLac-containing vancomycin-resistant enterococci, albeit by an undetermined mechanism. Contrasting models that invoke either cooperative dimerization and membrane anchoring or direct inhibition of bacterial transglycosylases have been proposed to explain the bioactivity of these glycopeptides.

RESULTS

Affinity chromatography has revealed direct interactions between a semisynthetic hydrophobic vancomycin (DCB-PV), and select Escherichia coli membrane proteins, including at least six enzymes involved in peptidoglycan assembly. The N(4)-vancosamine substituent is critical for protein binding. DCB-PV inhibits transglycosylation in permeabilized E. coli, consistent with the observed binding of the PBP-1B transglycosylase-transpeptidase.

CONCLUSIONS

Hydrophobic vancomycins interact directly with a select subset of bacterial membrane proteins, suggesting the existence of discrete protein targets. Transglycosylase inhibition may play a role in the enhanced bioactivity of semisynthetic glycopeptides.

Continuous versus intermittent infusion of vancomycin in severe Staphylococcal infections: prospective multicenter randomized study

A continuous infusion of vancomycin (CIV) may provide an alternative mode of infusion in severe hospital-acquired methicillin-resistant staphylococcal (MRS) infections. A multicenter, prospective, randomized study was designed to compare CIV (targeted plateau drug serum concentrations of 20 to 25 mg/liter) and intermittent infusions of vancomycin (IIV; targeted trough drug serum concentrations of 10 to 15 mg/liter) in 119 critically ill patients with MRS infections (bacteremic infections, 35%; pneumonia, 45%). Microbiological and clinical outcomes, safety, pharmacokinetics, ease of treatment adjustment, and cost were compared. Microbiological and clinical outcomes and safety were similar. CIV patients reached the targeted concentrations faster (36 +/- 31 versus 51 +/- 39 h, P = 0.029) and fewer samples were required for treatment monitoring than with IIV patients (7.7 +/- 2.2 versus 11.8 +/- 3.9 per treatment, P < 0.0001). The variability between patients in both the area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC(24h)) and the daily dose given over 10 days of treatment was lower with CIV than with IIV (variances, 14,621 versus 53,975 mg(2)/liter(2)/h(2) [P = 0.026] and 414 versus 818 g(2) [P = 0.057], respectively). The 10-day treatment cost per patient was $454 +/- 137 in the IIV group and was 23% lower in the CIV group ($321 +/- 81: P < 0.0001). In summary, for comparable efficacy and tolerance, CIV may be a cost-effective alternative to IIV.

Infective endocarditis and glycopeptides

BACKGROUND

Despite the number of antibacterial agents currently available, endocarditis remains a difficult disease to treat and the mortality rate has not fallen in recent years. The glycopeptides have good activity against the Gram-positive bacteria commonly implicated in endocarditis (staphylococci, both coagulase-positive and negative; enterococci and streptococci).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the impact of the glycopeptides vancomycin and teicoplanin on the therapy of infectious endocarditis caused by Gram-positive bacteria.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all major published or recently conducted studies using vancomycin or teicoplanin to treat endocarditis.

RESULTS

Cure rates obtained with vancomycin and teicoplanin are similar, but there are no controlled studies to investigate this. Vancomycin nephrotoxicity limits its use in endocarditis, in particular when used in combination with an aminoglycoside. By contrast, teicoplanin shows little nephrotoxic potential, even in patients with some degree of renal impairment or when given in combination with an aminoglycoside. Teicoplanin should be used at doses of 6 mg/kg/day or higher to achieve satisfactory cure rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical data on the use of glycopeptides in endocarditis suffer from a lack of controlled trials. Although teicoplanin appears to offer some advantages over vancomycin in the therapy of endocarditis, there is an urgent need for randomized, clinical trials before definitive conclusions can be drawn.