Oligodendrogliomas Lacking O6-Methylguanine-DNA-Methyltransferase Expression

O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase gene promoter methylation status in gliomas and its correlation with other molecular alterations: first Indian report with review of challenges for use in customized treatment

BACKGROUND

O6-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation in adult glioblastomas (glioblastoma multiforme) is considered a promising molecular alteration, predictive of better response to temozolomide therapy and longer overall survival.

OBJECTIVE

To look at the frequency of MGMT methylation in glial tumors of all grades and types, and correlate this alteration with loss of heterozygosity 1p/19q, TP53 gene mutations, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) amplification, and isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutations.

METHODS

One hundred two gliomas of various grades and subtypes were assessed by methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction for MGMT promoter methylation status. The results were correlated with 1p/19q status, EGFR amplification, TP53, and IDH1 mutations.

RESULTS

There was an inverse correlation of MGMT promoter methylation frequency with tumor grade, observed in 79.4%, 70.8%, and 56.8% of grade II, grade III, and grade IV gliomas, respectively. The difference was statistically significant in grade II vs IV tumors (P=.036). The majority of cases with 1p/19q loss of heterozygosity also showed MGMT methylation, although the association was not significant. There was no significant correlation of MGMT status with IDH1 mutation. In astrocytic tumors, there was no correlation of MGMT methylation with TP53 mutation or EGFR amplification.

CONCLUSION

MGMT promoter methylation was observed in a considerable proportion of all grades and subtypes of gliomas, with no significant correlation with other known genetic alterations. On extensive literature review, in both low- and high-grade gliomas, wide variability of data on the frequency of MGMT methylation and its association with other molecular alterations from various centers was noted, mostly owing to technical causes. This raises questions regarding the capacity of this test for use as an objective and reproducible marker for customized treatment in individual cases.

O6-Methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase in recurring anaplastic ependymomas: PCR and immunohistochemistry

Ependymomas are the third most common brain tumor in children. The post surgical management is controversial. There are no convincing data on an effective role for chemotherapy. O(6)-Methylguanine-DNA-Methyltransferase (MGMT) is a DNA repair protein considered to be a chemosensitivity predictor. Hypermethylation of the MGMT gene promoter is an important cause of MGMT inactivation. We evaluated the MGMT gene promoter methylation and the immunohistochemical MGMT protein expression in 12 recurrent anaplastic ependymomas affecting children. Our purpose was to investigate the molecular rationale of the administration of alkylating agents to children affected by recurrent anaplastic ependymomas. All ependymomas lacked MGMT promoter hypermethylation and 9 (75%) showed high MGMT protein expression (>50% tumoral cells). Differences between different recurrences in the same patient were not observed. These results may indicate MGMT as a factor of chemoresistance to alkylating drugs in anaplastic ependymomas and support the uncertainties regarding the actual benefit of chemotherapy for patients with anaplastic ependymomas.

Anti-O6-methylguanine-methyltransferase (MGMT) immunohistochemistry in glioblastoma multiforme: observer variability and lack of association with patient survival impede its use as clinical biomarker

Silencing of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) protein expression because of MGMT gene promoter hypermethylation is considered to be associated with postoperative chemoradiotherapy benefits in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients. The objective of this study was to clarify the usability of MGMT immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a clinical biomarker. We immunostained a tissue microarray containing biopsy samples of 164 GBM patients from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the National Cancer Institute of Canada (EORTC/NCIC) trial 26981/22981 using two commercial anti-MGMT antibodies (clones MT3.1 and MT23.2). Immunostaining results were semiquantitatively evaluated by four observers from three neuropathological laboratories using a predefined algorithm. We analyzed (i) inter- and intraobserver agreement on MGMT expression (kappa statistics); (ii) correlation of MGMT expression with MGMT promoter methylation status (kappa statistics); and (iii) correlation of MGMT expression with patient outcome (log-rank test). Interobserver agreement on MGMT expression varied from slight to almost perfect, whereas intraobserver agreement ranged from substantial to almost perfect. MGMT expression showed poor to moderate correlation with MGMT promoter methylation status. We found no significant association of MGMT expression with patient outcome. In our hands, observer variability as well as lack of association with the MGMT promoter methylation status and patient survival impeded the use of anti-MGMT immunohistochemistry as a clinical biomarker for routine diagnostic purposes.

MGMT immunohistochemical expression and promoter methylation in human glioblastoma

O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) expression has been recently proposed as a useful prognostic and/or predictive marker in glioblastoma patients receiving adjuvant therapy after the surgery. We studied samples from 50 patients with histologically confirmed GBM to evaluate MGMT expression by immunohistochemistry and its relation to promoter methylation status. Genomic DNA was extracted from scrapings of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue corresponding to hematoxylin and eosin sections. Using the mouse monoclonal antibody MT3.1, MGMT expression was assessed and scored in tumor cells: (1=negative or limited to <10% positive tumor cells, 2=10% to 50%, 3=>50%). Methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction was performed after bisulfite treatment. Assessment of MGMT expression in neoplastic tissue required careful scrutiny because of its expression in a variety of non-neoplastic cells. MGMT expression was present in tumor cells with a score of 1, 2, and 3, respectively in 36 (72%), 13 (26%), and 1 (2%) cases. Methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction yielded interpretable results in 39 cases (78%). MGMT promoter methylation was detected in 15 cases (38.5%), whereas 24 (61.5%) were unmethylated. Among the methylated samples, 14 (of 15) had a score of 1, and 1 had a score of 3 by immunohistochemistry. Of the 24 unmethylated samples, 18 had a score of 1, and 6 of 2. There was no significant correlation between MGMT expression and methylation, and no significant survival difference was observed between patients whose tumors were negative versus positive for MGMT protein by immunohistochemistry. This study underscores some of the difficulties in applying immunohistochemistry to assess MGMT expression.

Longitudinal assessment of genetic and epigenetic markers in oligodendrogliomas

PURPOSE

Because little is known about the evolution of genetic and epigenetic changes that occur during tumor progression in oligodendrogliomas, we evaluated these changes in paired early and progressive oligodendrogliomas.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

1p36, 19q13, 10q22-26, and O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status were assessed in 46 paired early and progressive oligodendrogliomas from 23 patients.

RESULTS

In early tumors, 60.8% were of low grade compared with only 17% low-grade tumors at recurrence. Of 17 early tumors described as pure oligodendrogliomas, 76.5% remained in this lineage, regardless of their grade, whereas others changed to astrocytic tumors. Oligoastrocytic tumors had a significantly higher tendency to transform to astrocytic tumors. All pure oligodendrogliomas with 1p/19q codeletions remained phenotypically unchanged, unlike mixed tumors with codeletions, of which 83% changed their cell lineage. Of tumors with early 1p deletion, 80% remained oligodendroglial at progression, whereas 75% of tumors with an intact 1p changed to astrocytic phenotype. 10q loss was uncommon in both early and progressive tumors. The proportional gain in methylation at progression was 31% for tumors with early 1p deletion, unlike tumors with an intact 1p, which had an 87.5% gain of methylation at progression.

CONCLUSIONS

Pure oligodendrogliomas with 1p/19q deletion tend to retain their cell phenotype and genetic profile unlike tumors with no deletions or mixed histology. MGMT promoter methylation is more pronounced at tumor progression, particularly in tumors with an intact 1p. These observations suggest that MGMT promoter methylation is a late event in progressive oligodendrogliomas, and therefore, their chemosensitivity is not necessarily related to MGMT methylation status.

Current Strategies in Treatment of Oligodendroglioma: Evolution of Molecular Signatures of Response

Oligodendroglioma frequently (≥ 70%) responds to radiation and chemotherapy, and is the first CNS neoplasm in which a genetic signature (1p and 19q deletion) has been associated with outcome within the context of large clinical trials. Current translational investigations focus on deletions or mutations of potential tumor suppressor genes, epigenetic alterations, amplification or mutation of growth factor and regulatory genes, and characterization of signaling events and regulatory protein expression. The most compelling data has involved 1p and 19q loss, which is observed in over 50% of anaplastic oligodendrogliomas. In two randomized phase III trials (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9402 and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 26951), the addition of neoadjuvant or adjuvant procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV; respectively) to radiotherapy did not produce superior survival as compared with radiotherapy alone. A modest increase in progression-free survival was observed with the addition of PCV, but at the cost of increased toxicity. Combined 1p and 19q loss identified a favorable prognostic group in both studies, which appeared to be independent of treatment arms. However, it is unclear whether these deletions represent surrogate markers of a favorable biologic tumor behavior, or are predictive of outcome after specific treatment. Currently, there is insufficient data to allow therapeutic decisions to be made solely on the basis of 1p and 19q gene deletion status. Future phase III trials are evaluating other chemotherapeutic and targeted agents, including temozolomide, and include correlative investigations of aberrant molecular events in these neoplasms, which may lead to future therapeutic strategies that are based on specific molecular signatures.