The impact of chemotherapy on overall survival and quality of life of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a review of phase III trials

Comparison of chemotherapy treatment administration via venous port and peripheral vascular access in terms of quality of life and costs

PURPOSE

In this study, it was aimed to compare the administration of chemotherapy drugs via venous port catheter and peripheral vein in metastatic colon cancer patients in terms of quality of life and treatment costs.

METHODS

The research was carried out in a university hospital in Turkey. The population of the study consists of 130 patients with metastatic colon cancer who were treated with chemotherapy. The sample of the study consists of 103 participants. During the data collection phase of the study, three data collection tools were used: demographic information form, EOTC QLQ-30 quality of life scale and invoices for treatments. Data were analyzed using Microsoft Office Excel and IBM SPSS 20 package programs.

RESULTS

In the study, 71.8% of the participants received chemotherapy with a venous port catheter, 65% for more than 3 months, 56.3% in the day unit. As a result of the study, it was found that there were no significant differences in the quality of life (except social function) according to the chemotherapy method. In addition, when the research results are examined in terms of cost, statistically significant differences were found in the treatment cost (except total costs excluding drugs) according to the chemotherapy application method.

CONCLUSION

In line with these results, it is thought that when choosing the chemotherapy application method, factors such as the treatment duration of the patients, the ease of opening the vascular access, and the patient's psychological state should be taken into consideration.

Proxies of quality of life in metastatic colorectal cancer: analyses in the RECOURSE trial

Background

In the pivotal phase III, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled RECOURSE study, treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil was well tolerated and associated with prolonged progression-free and overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). There was no formal analysis of quality of life (QoL) in RECOURSE. The aim of the present analysis was to assess proxies of QoL during the RECOURSE treatment period, in terms of adverse events (AEs) likely to affect QoL and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS).

Patients and methods

Enrolled patients had documented, previously treated (≥2 prior chemotherapy lines) mCRC and an ECOG PS of 0 or 1. Patients received best supportive care plus trifluridine/tipiracil 35 mg/m² twice daily (n=534) or placebo (n=266) in a 28-day cycle. AEs analysed included nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, dysgeusia and fatigue/asthenia. ECOG PS was determined at baseline, on day 1 of each treatment cycle, at treatment end and 30 days post-treatment discontinuation.

Results

AEs that affect QoL were more frequent in patients treated with trifluridine/tipiracil than placebo. Median treatment duration for patients experiencing at least one of these AEs was longer than that observed for the overall RECOURSE population (trifluridine/tipiracil: 12 vs 7 weeks; placebo: 10 vs 6 weeks). Versus placebo, the duration of most AEs was longer in trifluridine/tipiracil recipients; however, all AEs except nausea and vomiting occupied a lower proportion of the total treatment period. Of the patients who had their PS recorded at discontinuation, PS was maintained in 67% and 63% of trifluridine/tipiracil and placebo recipients, and 84% and 81% of the trifluridine/tipiracil and placebo patients remained at a PS of 0 or 1 at discontinuation.

Conclusions

Analysis of ECOG PS and AEs thought to affect QoL in the RECOURSE patient population suggests that trifluridine/tipiracil treatment does not result in a deterioration of patient QoL versus placebo.

Optimal first-line chemotherapeutic treatment in patients with locally advanced or metastatic esophagogastric carcinoma: triplet versus doublet chemotherapy: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

There is a debate whether triplet or doublet chemotherapy should be used as a first-line treatment in patients with advanced or metastatic esophagogastric cancer. Therefore, here we will review the available literature to assess the efficacy and safety of triplet versus doublet chemotherapy as a first-line treatment in patients with advanced esophagogastric cancer. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) between 1980 and March 2015 for randomized controlled phase II and III trials comparing triplet with doublet chemotherapy and abstracts of major oncology meetings from 1990 to 2014. Twenty-one studies with a total of 3475 participants were included in the meta-analysis for overall survival. An improvement in overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio (HR) 0.90, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.83–0.97) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 0.80, 95 % CI 0.69–0.93) was observed in favor of triplet. In addition, the use of triplet was associated with better objective response rate (ORR) (risk ratio 1.25, 95 % CI 1.09–1.44) compared to doublet. The risks of grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia (6.2 vs 3.8 %), infection (10.2 vs 6.4 %), and mucositis (9.7 vs 4.7 %) were statistically significantly increased with triplet compared to doublet. This review shows that first-line triplet therapy is superior to doublet therapy in patients with advanced esophagogastric cancer. However, the survival benefit is limited and the risks of grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia, infection, and mucositis are increased.

Extending the Frontiers Beyond Thermal Ablation by Radiofrequency Ablation: SBRT, Brachytherapy, SIRT (Radioembolization)

Metastatic spread of the primary is still defined as the systemic stage of disease in treatment guidelines for various solid tumors. This definition is the rationale for systemic therapy. Interestingly and despite the concept of systemic involvement, surgical resection as a local treatment has proven to yield long-term outcomes in a subset of patients with limited metastatic disease, supporting the concept of oligometastatic disease. Radiofrequency ablation has yielded favorable outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal metastases, and some studies indicate its prognostic potential in combined treatments with systemic therapies. However, some significant technical limitations apply, such as size limitation, heat sink effects, and unpredictable heat distribution to adjacent risk structures. Interventional and non-invasive radiotherapeutic techniques may overcome these limitations, expanding the options for oligometastatic patients and cytoreductive concepts. Current data suggest very high local control rates even in large tumors at any given location in the human body. The article focusses on the characteristics and possibilities of stereotactic body radiation therapy, interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy, and Yttrium-90 radioembolization. In this article, we discuss the differences of the technical preferences as well as their impact on indications. Current data is presented and discussed with a focus on application in oligometastatic or cytoreductive concepts in different tumor biologies.

LRIG1, a 3p tumor suppressor, represses EGFR signaling and is a novel epigenetic silenced gene in colorectal cancer

Downregulation of LRIG1 was found in many types of cancer. However, data concerning the possible mechanism of LRIG1 reduction in cancers were not reported yet. To analyze the regulation and function of LRIG1 in colorectal cancer (CRC), 6 cell lines, 46 paired tissues from primary CRC cases were employed in this study. In CRC cell lines, under-expression of LRIG1 was correlated with promoter region hypermethylation, and restoration of LRIG1 was induced by 5-Aza-2'-deoxyazacytidine treatment. Subsequently, we ectopically expressed LRIG1 in LRIG1 low-expressing HCT-116 cells and suppressed LRIG1 in LRIG1 high-expressing LoVo cells. We found that over-expression of LRIG1 inhibits cell proliferation and colony formation and tumor growth, while knockdown of LRIG1 promotes cell proliferation and colony formation. Decreased and increased EGFR/AKT signaling pathway may partially explain the lower and higher rates of proliferation in CRC cells transfected with LRIG1 cDNA or shRNA. In clinical samples, we compared the methylation, mRNA and protein expression of LRIG1 in samples of CRC tissues. A significant increase in LRIG1 methylation was identified in CRC specimens compared to adjacent normal tissues and that it was negatively correlated with its mRNA and protein expression. In conclusion, LRIG1 is frequently methylated in human CRC and consequent mRNA and protein downregulation may contribute to tumor growth by activating EGFR/AKT signaling.

Up-regulation of miR-592 correlates with tumor progression and poor prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer

miR-592, as a potential biomarker, has been linked to several cancers. However, the expression level and prognostic value of miR-592 in CRC have not been elucidated. In this study, we detected the miR-592 expression in CRC serum, tumor tissues, adjacent non-tumor tissues (NATs) and four colorectal cancer cell lines by RT-PCR. Our data proved that miR-592 expression was up-regulated in clinical CRC serum and tissues (P<0.05). Serum or tissue miR-592 in CRC metastatic patients also maintained a high level, compared to that in non-metastatic CRC patients (P<0.05). After radical surgery, postoperative serum miR-592 level in CRC patients significantly decreased (P<0.05). Our clinicopathological analysis revealed that high miR-592 was significant associated with the tumor size (P=0.008), TNM stage (P=0.026), distant metastasis (P=0.004) and preoperative CEA level (P=0.022), which led to a shorter overall survival rate in CRC patients (P=0.032). Furthermore, we designed and transfected miR-592 mimics or inhibitors into the corresponding CRC lines, and our experiments in vitro demonstrated that miR-592 could promote cell proliferation, wound healing and invasion ability of CRC cells (P<0.05), while miR-592 did not influence the CRC cell apoptosis (P>0.05). All these results suggested that miR-592 functioned as a novel and potential carcinogen-initiated and metastasis-related biomarker in CRC, and down-regulation of miR-592 might be considered as a potentially significant molecular treatment strategy for CRC patients.

Quality of life in the trastuzumab for gastric cancer trial

BACKGROUND

The Trastuzumab for Gastric Cancer phase III trial demonstrated that combining trastuzumab with chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival compared with chemotherapy alone in HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer. We report health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and quality-adjusted time without symptoms of disease or toxicity (Q-TWiST) results from this trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomized to receive six cycles of chemotherapy given every 3 weeks (capecitabine or fluorouracil, plus cisplatin) either alone or combined with administration of trastuzumab every 3 weeks until disease progression. At each clinical visit, HRQoL was assessed using two European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaires, QLQ-C30 and QLQ-STO22. Q-TWiST methodology was applied retrospectively using the clinical data and utility coefficients.

RESULTS

Trastuzumab plus chemotherapy prolonged time to 10% definitive deterioration in all QLQ-C30 and QLQ-STO22 scores, including QLQ-C30 global health status versus chemotherapy alone, from 6.4 months to 10.2 months. In addition, trastuzumab plus chemotherapy extended Q-TWiST by 2.42 months compared with chemotherapy alone.

CONCLUSION

Compared with chemotherapy alone, trastuzumab plus chemotherapy prolongs time to deterioration of HRQoL and increases quality-adjusted survival in patients with HER2-positive gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer.

NLK, a novel target of miR-199a-3p, functions as a tumor suppressor in colorectal cancer

We previously reported that miR-199a-3p is a newly biomarker for diagnosis and novel prognostic indicator in colorectal cancer. However, the miR-199a-3p regulatory mechanism and its target genes are still unclear. In our present study, we demonstrated miR-199a-3p could directly target 3'-UTR of NLK gene by luciferase reporter assay and western blot analysis. We detected NLK expressions in 92 colorectal cancer cases to evaluate its clinicopathologic characteristics in colorectal cancer. Our results showed that NLK expression was significantly downregulated in cancer tissues than NATs, and NLK low-expression was associated with lymph node metastasis, venous invasion, liver metastasis and the TNM stage (P<0.05). Moreover, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that low expression of NLK correlated with a shorter overall survival rates of patients with CRC (P<0.05). In vitro, we also found that NLK suppressed the biological behaviors of colorectal cancer cells, including the abilities of cell proliferation, clone formation, wound healing, migration and invasion (P<0.05), while overexpression of NLK increased the apoptotic rate of colorectal cancer cells. All these results suggested that NLK was an identified miR-199a-3p target gene and functioned as a tumor suppressor gene in colorectal cancer. NLK could be a novel direction for developing diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in colorectal cancer.

Symptom burden & quality of life among patients receiving second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Bevacizumab (B) and cetuximab (C) are both approved for use in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in the second-line. We examined patient reported symptom burden during second-line treatment of mCRC.

METHODS

Adult mCRC patients treated in the second-line setting with a regimen that included B, C, or chemotherapy only (O) and who had completed ≥ 1 Patient Care Monitor (PCM) surveys as part of routine clinical care were drawn from the ACORN Data Warehouse. Primary endpoints were rash, dry skin, itching, nail changes, nausea, vomiting, fatigue, burning in hands/feet, and diarrhea. Linear mixed models examined change in PCM scores across B, C and O (B = reference).

RESULTS

182 patients were enrolled (B: n = 106, C: n = 38, O: n = 38). Patients were 51% female, 67% Caucasian, with mean age of 62.0 (SD = 12.6). Groups did not differ on demographic or clinical characteristics. The most common second-line regimens were FOLFIRI ± B or C (23.1%) and FOLFOX ± B or C (22.5%). Results showed baseline scores to be strongly predictive of second-line symptoms across all PCM items (all p's < .0001 except for Rash, p = .0013). Controlling for baseline, patients on B tended to have more stable and less severe symptoms. Patients on C had more severe rash, dry skin, and itching and had nail change scores that worsened faster than did B patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients receiving second-line treatment for mCRC with B report less symptom burden, especially dermatologic, compared to patients treated with C.

Metastatic colorectal cancer: current treatment and future options for improved survival. Medical approach--present status

BACKGROUND

Metastatic colorectal cancer has a poor prognosis, and the majority of patients are left with palliative measures. The development seen using medical treatments are reviewed.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic approach to the literature-based evidence of effects from palliative chemotherapy and targeted drugs was aimed at.

RESULTS

The continuous improvements during the past 20-25 years have been documented in several large conclusive trials. At the end of the 1980s, the evidence that chemotherapy should be used at all was very limited, whereas presently most patients can be offered three lines of chemotherapy with or without a targeted drug based upon good scientific evidence. Median survival in trials has gradually improved from about 6 months to above 24 months in the most recent trials. Survival in the populations has, however, not improved to the same extent. Several important issues remain to be solved, such as the best sequence of treatments, what regimens to use in various situations, when to start and when to stop if a response is seen, whether cure may be possible in a small subset of patients, and socioeconomic issues. Integration of surgery and other local methods have further improved outcome for some individuals, but must be fine-tuned.

CONCLUSIONS

Progress has been rapid in advanced colorectal cancer. This is likely a result of well-designed trials in collaboration between academy and industry, showing a great interest in the disease. A multi-professional approach and future collaborations may hopefully introduce new treatment concepts, further improving outcome.

Prognostic factors in primary and iterative surgery of colorectal liver metastases

The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of surgery of colorectal liver metastases and assess prognostic factors influencing the outcome. A total of 135 hepatic resections performed in 107 patients was reviewed. The following prognostic factors were analyzed: primary tumor localization, Dukes stage, number and presence of metastases in one or two lobes, synchronous or metachronous occurrence, type of resection, use and modality of chemotherapy. The perioperative morbidity rate was 6.5% and mortality was 1.9%. Overall survival was 41.2% and disease-free survival 31.5% at 5 years. Survival at 5 years was better for patients with metachronous than for those with synchronous lesions (60.9% vs 28.1%; p<0.05). There were no significant differences in terms of long-term survival between patients with synchronous metastases that were excised simultaneously or with a delay of 3-6 months (p=n.s.). Site of the primary tumor, Dukes stage, number of metastases and type of resection did not influence survival. A favorable survival trend was observed in those patients who underwent both neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy. The overall survival rate at 5 years was 45.3% for patients undergoing a second hepatic resection and 50% for those with a third or a fourth hepatic resection. Liver resection remains the "gold standard" for the treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastases, with metachronous type having a better outcome than synchronous. Simultaneous or delayed surgery for synchronous metastases does not influence prognosis. Iterative resection is very encouraging and justifies an aggressive surgical approach.

Healthcare costs associated with bevacizumab and cetuximab in second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

To compare the health care costs of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who received second-line treatment with Avastin (bevacizumab) versus Erbitux (cetuximab), from the third-party payer's perspective.

METHODS

Patients with mCRC were selected from the PharMetrics claims database if they received second-line therapy containing either bevacizumab (second-line bevacizumab cohort) or cetuximab (second-line cetuximab cohort). Six-month costs following second-line therapy start date and average monthly healthcare costs while on second-line therapy (in 2009 US$) were calculated and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 2188 patients with mCRC who met the eligibility criteria were included in the analysis, including 1808 patients receiving bevacizumab and 380 patients receiving cetuximab in second-line treatment. Demographic and baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. Patients' mean age was 61 years and 56% were males. In second-line treatment, bevacizumab was commonly used with oxaliplatin (43.5%) and irinotecan-based regimens (40.4%), whereas cetuximab was commonly used with irinotecan-based regimens (68.2%). Bevacizumab patients had significantly lower total all-cause healthcare costs than cetuximab patients (adjusted difference: -$10,231, p = 0.020), and lower medical costs (-$10,796, p = 0.012) during the 6 months following second-line therapy initiation. Approximately half of the difference in total all-cause healthcare costs was attributable to the lower chemotherapy and targeted therapy costs (-$5635, p = 0.032) of bevacizumab patients than those of cetuximab patients. While on second-line therapy, bevacizumab patients also had lower average monthly all-cause healthcare costs than cetuximab patients.

LIMITATIONS

Second-line treatment in the current study was defined based on changes in mCRC medications, not based on disease progression due to the limited clinical information available in claims.

CONCLUSION

The use of bevacizumab in second-line therapy was associated with significantly lower healthcare costs in mCRC patients, compared to the use of cetuximab.

Impact of chemotherapy on quality of life in patients with metastatic esophagogastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is a key issue in patients with metastatic esophagogastric cancer, a disease associated with survival times rarely exceeding 10 months. The objective of the current review was to evaluate the effects of chemotherapy on the HRQoL of patients with metastatic or locally advanced, inoperable esophagogastric cancer.

METHODS

A systematic MEDLINE search was performed to address a predefined question list: Does chemotherapy improve or maintain HRQoL? Do available data favor a particular chemotherapy? What relation exists between HRQoL and the efficacy and tolerability of therapy?

RESULTS

The majority of studies, including large randomized studies, indicated no significant improvements in mean HRQoL scores versus baseline after chemotherapy. However, scores were maintained and symptomatic relief or improved performance status was observed in many patients. HRQoL was maintained in approximately 50% of patients for up to 6 months but deteriorated in the remaining patients. In randomized phase 3 trials, only cisplatin/fluorouracil plus either docetaxel or epirubicin were found to provide superior HRQoL versus comparators. Between-regimen differences in HRQoL scores appeared to correspond to differences in the efficacy rather than the toxicity of treatment regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Chemotherapy maintained HRQoL in a substantial proportion of patients with advanced esophagogastric cancer. This effect appeared to correspond to the efficacy of the treatment.