Assessing territorial space conflicts in the coastal zone of Wenzhou, China: A land-sea interaction perspective

Territorial space conflicts (TSCs) in coastal zones stem from the intricate interaction between the land-sea dual system, significantly impacting the sustainable development of these areas. To accurately identify TSCs, our study proposed a theoretical framework based on a land-sea interaction perspective. We also assessed TSCs using the territorial space conflicts index and a social network analysis model. We demonstrated the proposed spatial conflicts assessment methodology through a case study of Wenzhou, a typical city on the east coast of China. Our results indicate that the distribution of TSCs gradually decreased from the coastal zone to the inland zone, with significant variation in the distribution of different conflict types across different zones. The findings also reveal that territorial space use had diverse impacts on the space conflict network, making it urgent to take targeted measures. In the future, it is crucial to comprehensively consider the overall pattern and distribution characteristics of current TSCs, as well as the spatial spillover effect of the overall network, to develop targeted coping strategies and regulation mechanisms that promote the integration and high-quality development of coastal territorial space systems. To maintain a sustainable coastal zone process, we proposed a set of optimization paths for alleviating TSCs and promoting the coordinated development of land and sea regions in China based on our study.

A multi-criteria simulation-optimization coupling approach for effective emergency response in marine oil spill accidents

Effective marine oil spill responses are vital to reduce environmental, societal, and economic damage. This study developed a Multi-Criteria Emergency Response System (MC-ERS) to comprehensively evaluate response efficiency, operational costs, and environmental losses. The proposed system integrates dynamic multiphase simulation of oil weathering and oil cleanup processes and further provides effective planning for multi-stage resource allocation through system optimization. The developed weight-sum model improved the performance of response operations by reducing the complexity of multi-criteria decision-making. Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) was chosen as the foundational optimization algorithm due to its efficiency in rapid convergence and suitability for complex problems. From extensive comparisons of PSO variants across benchmark functions and inertia strategies, the C-PSO algorithm was developed, demonstrating enhanced optimization performance for MC-ERS. The developed modelling system performance was demonstrated and evaluated through a representative case study. The optimization plan coordinated resource allocation from onshore warehouses to harbors and spill sites, balancing oil recovery efficiency, costs, and ecological losses. Optimized results indicate an oil recovery of up to 76.50% in five days. Additionally, the system cuts costs by 3.45% and environmental losses by 15.75%. The findings enhance the efficiency of marine oil spill emergency response and provide support for such incidents.

Amplitude Analysis of the B^{0}→K^{*0}μ^{+}μ^{-} Decay

An amplitude analysis of the B^{0}→K^{*0}μ^{+}μ^{-} decay is presented using a dataset corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 4.7  fb^{-1} of pp collision data collected with the LHCb experiment. For the first time, the coefficients associated to short-distance physics effects, sensitive to processes beyond the standard model, are extracted directly from the data through a q^{2}-unbinned amplitude analysis, where q^{2} is the μ^{+}μ^{-} invariant mass squared. Long-distance contributions, which originate from nonfactorizable QCD processes, are systematically investigated, and the most accurate assessment to date of their impact on the physical observables is obtained. The pattern of measured corrections to the short-distance couplings is found to be consistent with previous analyses of b- to s-quark transitions, with the largest discrepancy from the standard model predictions found to be at the level of 1.8 standard deviations. The global significance of the observed differences in the decay is 1.4 standard deviations.

Fraction of χ_{c} Decays in Prompt J/ψ Production Measured in pPb Collisions at sqrt[s_{NN}]=8.16 TeV

The fraction of χ_{c1} and χ_{c2} decays in the prompt J/ψ yield, F_{χ_{c}→J/ψ}=σ_{χ_{c}→J/ψ}/σ_{J/ψ}, is measured by the LHCb detector in pPb collisions at sqrt[s_{NN}]=8.16  TeV. The study covers the forward (1.5 Collapse

Key Words Collapse

MESH Headings Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

R Aaij Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics, Amsterdam, Netherlands
A S W Abdelmotteleb Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
C Abellan Beteta Physik-Institut, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
F Abudinén Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
T Ackernley Oliver Lodge Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
B Adeva Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
M Adinolfi H.H. Wills Physics Laboratory, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
P Adlarson Department of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden (associated with School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom)
C Agapopoulou European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
C A Aidala University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA (associated with Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA)
Z Ajaltouni Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS/IN2P3, LPC, Clermont-Ferrand, France
S Akar University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
K Akiba Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics, Amsterdam, Netherlands
P Albicocco INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Frascati, Italy
J Albrecht Fakultät Physik, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
F Alessio European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
M Alexander School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
A Alfonso Albero ICCUB, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Z Aliouche Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
P Alvarez Cartelle Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
R Amalric LPNHE, Sorbonne Université, Paris Diderot Sorbonne Paris Cité, CNRS/IN2P3, Paris, France
S Amato Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
J L Amey H.H. Wills Physics Laboratory, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
Y Amhis Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab, Orsay, France European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
L An School of Physics State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing, China
L Anderlini INFN Sezione di Firenze, Firenze, Italy
M Andersson Physik-Institut, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
A Andreianov Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
P Andreola Physik-Institut, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
M Andreotti INFN Sezione di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
D Andreou Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA
A A Anelli INFN Sezione di Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy
D Ao University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
F Archilli INFN Sezione di Roma Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy
M Argenton INFN Sezione di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
S Arguedas Cuendis Consejo Nacional de Rectores (CONARE), San Jose, Costa Rica
A Artamonov Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
M Artuso Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA
E Aslanides Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS/IN2P3, CPPM, Marseille, France
M Atzeni Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
B Audurier Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet, CNRS/IN2P3, Ecole Polytechnique, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, Palaiseau, France
D Bacher Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
I Bachiller Perea Université Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, IN2P3-LAPP, Annecy, France
S Bachmann Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
M Bachmayer Institute of Physics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
J J Back Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
A Bailly-Reyre LPNHE, Sorbonne Université, Paris Diderot Sorbonne Paris Cité, CNRS/IN2P3, Paris, France
P Baladron Rodriguez Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
V Balagura Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet, CNRS/IN2P3, Ecole Polytechnique, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, Palaiseau, France
W Baldini INFN Sezione di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
J Baptista de Souza Leite Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas (CBPF), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
M Barbetti INFN Sezione di Firenze, Firenze, Italy
I R Barbosa Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (associated with Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil)
R J Barlow Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
S Barsuk Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab, Orsay, France
W Barter School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
M Bartolini Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
F Baryshnikov Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
J M Basels I. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
G Bassi INFN Sezione di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
B Batsukh Institute Of High Energy Physics (IHEP), Beijing, China
A Battig Fakultät Physik, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
A Bay Institute of Physics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
A Beck Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
M Becker Fakultät Physik, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
F Bedeschi INFN Sezione di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
I B Bediaga Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas (CBPF), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
A Beiter Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA
S Belin Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
V Bellee Physik-Institut, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
K Belous Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
I Belov INFN Sezione di Genova, Genova, Italy
I Belyaev Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
G Benane Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS/IN2P3, CPPM, Marseille, France
G Bencivenni INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Frascati, Italy
E Ben-Haim LPNHE, Sorbonne Université, Paris Diderot Sorbonne Paris Cité, CNRS/IN2P3, Paris, France
A Berezhnoy Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
R Bernet Physik-Institut, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
S Bernet Andres DS4DS, La Salle, Universitat Ramon Llull, Barcelona, Spain
H C Bernstein Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA
C Bertella Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
A Bertolin Università degli Studi di Padova, Università e INFN, Padova, Padova, Italy
C Betancourt Physik-Institut, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
F Betti School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
J Bex Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Ia Bezshyiko Physik-Institut, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
J Bhom Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland
M S Bieker Fakultät Physik, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
N V Biesuz INFN Sezione di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
P Billoir LPNHE, Sorbonne Université, Paris Diderot Sorbonne Paris Cité, CNRS/IN2P3, Paris, France
A Biolchini Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics, Amsterdam, Netherlands
M Birch Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
F C R Bishop Université Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, IN2P3-LAPP, Annecy, France
A Bitadze Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
A Bizzeti School of Physics and Astronomy, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas (CBPF), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China Institute Of High Energy Physics (IHEP), Beijing, China School of Physics State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China Institute of Particle Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei, China Consejo Nacional de Rectores (CONARE), San Jose, Costa Rica Université Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, IN2P3-LAPP, Annecy, France Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS/IN2P3, LPC, Clermont-Ferrand, France Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS/IN2P3, CPPM, Marseille, France Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab, Orsay, France Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet, CNRS/IN2P3, Ecole Polytechnique, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, Palaiseau, France LPNHE, Sorbonne Université, Paris Diderot Sorbonne Paris Cité, CNRS/IN2P3, Paris, France I. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany Fakultät Physik, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK), Heidelberg, Germany Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany School of Physics, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland INFN Sezione di Bari, Bari, Italy INFN Sezione di Bologna, Bologna, Italy INFN Sezione di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy INFN Sezione di Firenze, Firenze, Italy INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Frascati, Italy INFN Sezione di Genova, Genova, Italy INFN Sezione di Milano, Milano, Italy INFN Sezione di Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy INFN Sezione di Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy Università degli Studi di Padova, Università e INFN, Padova, Padova, Italy INFN Sezione di Perugia, Perugia, Italy INFN Sezione di Pisa, Pisa, Italy INFN Sezione di Roma La Sapienza, Roma, Italy INFN Sezione di Roma Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics, Amsterdam, Netherlands Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands AGH - University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, Kraków, Poland Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ), Warsaw, Poland Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN DS4DS, La Salle, Universitat Ramon Llull, Barcelona, Spain ICCUB, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular, Centro Mixto Universidad de Valencia - CSIC, Valencia, Spain European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland Institute of Physics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland Physik-Institut, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland NSC Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology (NSC KIPT), Kharkiv, Ukraine Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR), Kyiv, Ukraine University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom H.H. Wills Physics Laboratory, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Didcot, United Kingdom School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom Oliver Lodge Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (associated with Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) School of Physics and Electronics, Hunan University, Changsha City, China (associated with Institute of Particle Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei, China) Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Nuclear Science, Guangdong-Hong Kong Joint Laboratory of Quantum Matter, Institute of Quantum Matter, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China (associated with Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China) Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China (associated with Institute Of High Energy Physics (IHEP), Beijing, China) School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China (associated with Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China) Departamento de Fisica, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogota, Colombia (associated with LPNHE, Sorbonne Université, Paris Diderot Sorbonne Paris Cité, CNRS/IN2P3, Paris, France) Universität Bonn - Helmholtz-Institut für Strahlen und Kernphysik, Bonn, Germany (associated with Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany) Eotvos Lorand University, Budapest, Hungary (associated with European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland) Van Swinderen Institute, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands (associated with Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics, Amsterdam, Netherlands) Universiteit Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands (associated with Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics, Amsterdam, Netherlands) Tadeusz Kosciuszko Cracow University of Technology, Cracow, Poland (associated with Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland) Department of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden (associated with School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom) University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA (associated with Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA) Departement de Physique Nucleaire (SPhN), Gif-Sur-Yvette, France
M P Blago Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
T Blake Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
F Blanc Institute of Physics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
J E Blank Fakultät Physik, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
S Blusk Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA
D Bobulska School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
V Bocharnikov Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
J A Boelhauve Fakultät Physik, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
O Boente Garcia Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet, CNRS/IN2P3, Ecole Polytechnique, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, Palaiseau, France
T Boettcher University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
A Bohare School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
A Boldyrev Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
C S Bolognani Universiteit Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands (associated with Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics, Amsterdam, Netherlands)
R Bolzonella INFN Sezione di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
N Bondar Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
F Borgato Università degli Studi di Padova, Università e INFN, Padova, Padova, Italy European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
S Borghi Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
M Borsato INFN Sezione di Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy
J T Borsuk Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland
S A Bouchiba Institute of Physics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
T J V Bowcock Oliver Lodge Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
A Boyer European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
C Bozzi INFN Sezione di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
M J Bradley Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
S Braun University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
A Brea Rodriguez Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
N Breer Fakultät Physik, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
J Brodzicka Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland
A Brossa Gonzalo Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
J Brown Oliver Lodge Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
D Brundu INFN Sezione di Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy
A Buonaura Physik-Institut, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
L Buonincontri Università degli Studi di Padova, Università e INFN, Padova, Padova, Italy
A T Burke Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
C Burr European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
A Bursche Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Nuclear Science, Guangdong-Hong Kong Joint Laboratory of Quantum Matter, Institute of Quantum Matter, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China (associated with Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China)
A Butkevich Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
J S Butter Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
J Buytaert European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
W Byczynski European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
S Cadeddu INFN Sezione di Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy
H Cai School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China (associated with Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China)
R Calabrese INFN Sezione di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
L Calefice Fakultät Physik, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
S Cali INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Frascati, Italy
M Calvi INFN Sezione di Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy
M Calvo Gomez DS4DS, La Salle, Universitat Ramon Llull, Barcelona, Spain
J Cambon Bouzas Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
P Campana INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Frascati, Italy
D H Campora Perez Universiteit Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands (associated with Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics, Amsterdam, Netherlands)
A F Campoverde Quezada University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
S Capelli INFN Sezione di Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy
L Capriotti INFN Sezione di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
R Caravaca-Mora Consejo Nacional de Rectores (CONARE), San Jose, Costa Rica
A Carbone INFN Sezione di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
L Carcedo Salgado Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
R Cardinale INFN Sezione di Genova, Genova, Italy
A Cardini INFN Sezione di Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy
P Carniti INFN Sezione di Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy
L Carus Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
A Casais Vidal Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
R Caspary Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
G Casse Oliver Lodge Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
J Castro Godinez Consejo Nacional de Rectores (CONARE), San Jose, Costa Rica
M Cattaneo European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
G Cavallero INFN Sezione di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
V Cavallini INFN Sezione di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
S Celani Institute of Physics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
J Cerasoli Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS/IN2P3, CPPM, Marseille, France
D Cervenkov Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
S Cesare INFN Sezione di Milano, Milano, Italy
A J Chadwick Oliver Lodge Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
I Chahrour University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA (associated with Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA)
M Charles LPNHE, Sorbonne Université, Paris Diderot Sorbonne Paris Cité, CNRS/IN2P3, Paris, France
Ph Charpentier European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
C A Chavez Barajas Oliver Lodge Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
M Chefdeville Université Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, IN2P3-LAPP, Annecy, France
C Chen Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS/IN2P3, CPPM, Marseille, France
S Chen Institute Of High Energy Physics (IHEP), Beijing, China
A Chernov Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland
S Chernyshenko Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR), Kyiv, Ukraine
V Chobanova Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
S Cholak Institute of Physics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
M Chrzaszcz Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland
A Chubykin Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
V Chulikov Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
P Ciambrone INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Frascati, Italy
M F Cicala Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
X Cid Vidal Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
G Ciezarek European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
P Cifra European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
P E L Clarke School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
M Clemencic European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
H V Cliff Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
J Closier European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
J L Cobbledick Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
C Cocha Toapaxi Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
V Coco European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
J Cogan Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS/IN2P3, CPPM, Marseille, France
E Cogneras Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS/IN2P3, LPC, Clermont-Ferrand, France
L Cojocariu Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania
P Collins European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
T Colombo European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
A Comerma-Montells ICCUB, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
L Congedo INFN Sezione di Bari, Bari, Italy
A Contu INFN Sezione di Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy
N Cooke School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
I Corredoira Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
A Correia LPNHE, Sorbonne Université, Paris Diderot Sorbonne Paris Cité, CNRS/IN2P3, Paris, France
G Corti European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
J J Cottee Meldrum H.H. Wills Physics Laboratory, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
B Couturier European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
D C Craik Physik-Institut, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
M Cruz Torres Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas (CBPF), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
R Currie School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
C L Da Silva Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA
S Dadabaev Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
L Dai School of Physics and Electronics, Hunan University, Changsha City, China (associated with Institute of Particle Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei, China)
X Dai School of Physics State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing, China
E Dall'Occo Fakultät Physik, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
J Dalseno Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
C D'Ambrosio European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
J Daniel Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS/IN2P3, LPC, Clermont-Ferrand, France
A Danilina Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
P d'Argent INFN Sezione di Bari, Bari, Italy
A Davidson Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
J E Davies Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
A Davis Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
O De Aguiar Francisco Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
C De Angelis INFN Sezione di Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy
J de Boer Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics, Amsterdam, Netherlands
K De Bruyn Van Swinderen Institute, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands (associated with Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics, Amsterdam, Netherlands)
S De Capua Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
M De Cian Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
U De Freitas Carneiro Da Graca Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas (CBPF), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
E De Lucia INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Frascati, Italy
J M De Miranda Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas (CBPF), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
L De Paula Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
M De Serio INFN Sezione di Bari, Bari, Italy
D De Simone Physik-Institut, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
P De Simone INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Frascati, Italy
F De Vellis Fakultät Physik, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
J A de Vries Universiteit Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands (associated with Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics, Amsterdam, Netherlands)
F Debernardis INFN Sezione di Bari, Bari, Italy
D Decamp Université Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, IN2P3-LAPP, Annecy, France
V Dedu Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS/IN2P3, CPPM, Marseille, France
L Del Buono LPNHE, Sorbonne Université, Paris Diderot Sorbonne Paris Cité, CNRS/IN2P3, Paris, France
B Delaney Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
H-P Dembinski Fakultät Physik, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
J Deng Institute of Particle Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
V Denysenko Physik-Institut, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
O Deschamps Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS/IN2P3, LPC, Clermont-Ferrand, France
F Dettori INFN Sezione di Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy
B Dey Eotvos Lorand University, Budapest, Hungary (associated with European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland)
P Di Nezza INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Frascati, Italy
I Diachkov Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
S Didenko Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
S Ding Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA
V Dobishuk Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR), Kyiv, Ukraine
A D Docheva School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
A Dolmatov Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
C Dong Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
A M Donohoe School of Physics, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
F Dordei INFN Sezione di Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy
A C Dos Reis Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas (CBPF), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
L Douglas School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
A G Downes Université Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, IN2P3-LAPP, Annecy, France
W Duan Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Nuclear Science, Guangdong-Hong Kong Joint Laboratory of Quantum Matter, Institute of Quantum Matter, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China (associated with Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China)
P Duda Tadeusz Kosciuszko Cracow University of Technology, Cracow, Poland (associated with Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland)
M W Dudek Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland
L Dufour European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
V Duk INFN Sezione di Perugia, Perugia, Italy
P Durante European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
M M Duras Tadeusz Kosciuszko Cracow University of Technology, Cracow, Poland (associated with Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland)
J M Durham Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA
A Dziurda Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland
A Dzyuba Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
S Easo European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Didcot, United Kingdom
E Eckstein Universität Bonn - Helmholtz-Institut für Strahlen und Kernphysik, Bonn, Germany (associated with Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany)
U Egede School of Physics and Astronomy, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
A Egorychev Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
V Egorychev Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
C Eirea Orro Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
S Eisenhardt School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
E Ejopu Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
S Ek-In Institute of Physics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
L Eklund Department of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden (associated with School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom)
M Elashri University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
J Ellbracht Fakultät Physik, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
S Ely Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
A Ene Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania
E Epple University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
S Escher I. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
J Eschle Physik-Institut, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
S Esen Physik-Institut, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
T Evans Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
F Fabiano INFN Sezione di Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
L N Falcao Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas (CBPF), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Y Fan University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
B Fang Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab, Orsay, France School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China (associated with Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China)
L Fantini INFN Sezione di Perugia, Perugia, Italy
M Faria Institute of Physics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
K Farmer School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
D Fazzini INFN Sezione di Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy
L Felkowski Tadeusz Kosciuszko Cracow University of Technology, Cracow, Poland (associated with Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland)
M Feng Institute Of High Energy Physics (IHEP), Beijing, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
M Feo European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
M Fernandez Gomez Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
A D Fernez University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
F Ferrari INFN Sezione di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
F Ferreira Rodrigues Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
S Ferreres Sole Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics, Amsterdam, Netherlands
M Ferrillo Physik-Institut, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
M Ferro-Luzzi European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
S Filippov Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
R A Fini INFN Sezione di Bari, Bari, Italy
M Fiorini INFN Sezione di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
M Firlej AGH - University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, Kraków, Poland
K M Fischer Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
D S Fitzgerald University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA (associated with Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA)
C Fitzpatrick Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
T Fiutowski AGH - University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, Kraków, Poland
F Fleuret Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet, CNRS/IN2P3, Ecole Polytechnique, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, Palaiseau, France
M Fontana INFN Sezione di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
F Fontanelli INFN Sezione di Genova, Genova, Italy
L F Foreman Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
R Forty European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
D Foulds-Holt Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
M Franco Sevilla University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
M Frank European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
E Franzoso INFN Sezione di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
G Frau Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
C Frei European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
D A Friday Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
L Frontini INFN Sezione di Milano, Milano, Italy
J Fu University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Q Fuehring Fakultät Physik, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
Y Fujii School of Physics and Astronomy, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
T Fulghesu LPNHE, Sorbonne Université, Paris Diderot Sorbonne Paris Cité, CNRS/IN2P3, Paris, France
E Gabriel Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics, Amsterdam, Netherlands
G Galati INFN Sezione di Bari, Bari, Italy
M D Galati Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics, Amsterdam, Netherlands
A Gallas Torreira Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
D Galli INFN Sezione di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
S Gambetta European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
M Gandelman Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
P Gandini INFN Sezione di Milano, Milano, Italy
H Gao University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
R Gao Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
Y Gao Institute of Particle Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
Y Gao School of Physics State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing, China
Y Gao Institute of Particle Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
M Garau INFN Sezione di Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy
L M Garcia Martin Institute of Physics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
P Garcia Moreno ICCUB, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
J García Pardiñas European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
B Garcia Plana Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
K G Garg Institute of Particle Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
L Garrido ICCUB, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
C Gaspar European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
R E Geertsema Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics, Amsterdam, Netherlands
L L Gerken Fakultät Physik, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
E Gersabeck Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
M Gersabeck Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
T Gershon Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
Z Ghorbanimoghaddam H.H. Wills Physics Laboratory, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
L Giambastiani Università degli Studi di Padova, Università e INFN, Padova, Padova, Italy
F I Giasemis LPNHE, Sorbonne Université, Paris Diderot Sorbonne Paris Cité, CNRS/IN2P3, Paris, France
V Gibson Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
H K Giemza National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ), Warsaw, Poland
A L Gilman Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
M Giovannetti INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Frascati, Italy
A Gioventù ICCUB, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
P Gironella Gironell ICCUB, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
C Giugliano INFN Sezione di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
M A Giza Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland
E L Gkougkousis Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
F C Glaser Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab, Orsay, France Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
V V Gligorov LPNHE, Sorbonne Université, Paris Diderot Sorbonne Paris Cité, CNRS/IN2P3, Paris, France
C Göbel Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (associated with Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil)
E Golobardes DS4DS, La Salle, Universitat Ramon Llull, Barcelona, Spain
D Golubkov Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
A Golutvin Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
A Gomes Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas (CBPF), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
S Gomez Fernandez ICCUB, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
F Goncalves Abrantes Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
M Goncerz Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland
G Gong Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
J A Gooding Fakultät Physik, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
I V Gorelov Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
C Gotti INFN Sezione di Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy
J P Grabowski Universität Bonn - Helmholtz-Institut für Strahlen und Kernphysik, Bonn, Germany (associated with Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany)
L A Granado Cardoso European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
E Graugés ICCUB, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
E Graverini Institute of Physics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
L Grazette Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
G Graziani School of Physics and Astronomy, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas (CBPF), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China Institute Of High Energy Physics (IHEP), Beijing, China School of Physics State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China Institute of Particle Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei, China Consejo Nacional de Rectores (CONARE), San Jose, Costa Rica Université Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, IN2P3-LAPP, Annecy, France Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS/IN2P3, LPC, Clermont-Ferrand, France Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS/IN2P3, CPPM, Marseille, France Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab, Orsay, France Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet, CNRS/IN2P3, Ecole Polytechnique, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, Palaiseau, France LPNHE, Sorbonne Université, Paris Diderot Sorbonne Paris Cité, CNRS/IN2P3, Paris, France I. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany Fakultät Physik, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK), Heidelberg, Germany Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany School of Physics, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland INFN Sezione di Bari, Bari, Italy INFN Sezione di Bologna, Bologna, Italy INFN Sezione di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy INFN Sezione di Firenze, Firenze, Italy INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Frascati, Italy INFN Sezione di Genova, Genova, Italy INFN Sezione di Milano, Milano, Italy INFN Sezione di Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy INFN Sezione di Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy Università degli Studi di Padova, Università e INFN, Padova, Padova, Italy INFN Sezione di Perugia, Perugia, Italy INFN Sezione di Pisa, Pisa, Italy INFN Sezione di Roma La Sapienza, Roma, Italy INFN Sezione di Roma Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics, Amsterdam, Netherlands Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands AGH - University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, Kraków, Poland Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ), Warsaw, Poland Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN DS4DS, La Salle, Universitat Ramon Llull, Barcelona, Spain ICCUB, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular, Centro Mixto Universidad de Valencia - CSIC, Valencia, Spain European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland Institute of Physics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland Physik-Institut, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland NSC Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology (NSC KIPT), Kharkiv, Ukraine Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR), Kyiv, Ukraine University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom H.H. Wills Physics Laboratory, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Didcot, United Kingdom School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom Oliver Lodge Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (associated with Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) School of Physics and Electronics, Hunan University, Changsha City, China (associated with Institute of Particle Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei, China) Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Nuclear Science, Guangdong-Hong Kong Joint Laboratory of Quantum Matter, Institute of Quantum Matter, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China (associated with Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China) Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China (associated with Institute Of High Energy Physics (IHEP), Beijing, China) School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China (associated with Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China) Departamento de Fisica, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogota, Colombia (associated with LPNHE, Sorbonne Université, Paris Diderot Sorbonne Paris Cité, CNRS/IN2P3, Paris, France) Universität Bonn - Helmholtz-Institut für Strahlen und Kernphysik, Bonn, Germany (associated with Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany) Eotvos Lorand University, Budapest, Hungary (associated with European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland) Van Swinderen Institute, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands (associated with Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics, Amsterdam, Netherlands) Universiteit Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands (associated with Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics, Amsterdam, Netherlands) Tadeusz Kosciuszko Cracow University of Technology, Cracow, Poland (associated with Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland) Department of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden (associated with School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom) University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA (associated with Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA) Departement de Physique Nucleaire (SPhN), Gif-Sur-Yvette, France
A T Grecu Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania
L M Greeven Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics, Amsterdam, Netherlands
N A Grieser University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
L Grillo School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
S Gromov Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
C Gu Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet, CNRS/IN2P3, Ecole Polytechnique, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, Palaiseau, France
M Guarise INFN Sezione di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
M Guittiere Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab, Orsay, France
V Guliaeva Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
P A Günther Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
A-K Guseinov Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
E Gushchin Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
Y Guz School of Physics State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing, China Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
T Gys European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
T Hadavizadeh School of Physics and Astronomy, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
C Hadjivasiliou University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
G Haefeli Institute of Physics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
C Haen European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
J Haimberger European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
M Hajheidari European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
T Halewood-Leagas Oliver Lodge Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
M M Halvorsen European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
P M Hamilton University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
J Hammerich Oliver Lodge Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
Q Han Institute of Particle Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
X Han Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
S Hansmann-Menzemer Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
L Hao University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
N Harnew Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
T Harrison Oliver Lodge Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
M Hartmann Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab, Orsay, France
C Hasse European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
J He University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
K Heijhoff Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics, Amsterdam, Netherlands
F Hemmer European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
C Henderson University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
R D L Henderson School of Physics and Astronomy, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
A M Hennequin European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
K Hennessy Oliver Lodge Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
L Henry Institute of Physics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
J Herd Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
J Heuel I. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
A Hicheur Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
D Hill Institute of Physics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
S E Hollitt Fakultät Physik, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
J Horswill Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
R Hou Institute of Particle Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
Y Hou Université Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, IN2P3-LAPP, Annecy, France
N Howarth Oliver Lodge Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
J Hu Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
J Hu Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Nuclear Science, Guangdong-Hong Kong Joint Laboratory of Quantum Matter, Institute of Quantum Matter, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China (associated with Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China)
W Hu School of Physics State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing, China
X Hu Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
W Huang University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
W Hulsbergen Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics, Amsterdam, Netherlands
R J Hunter Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
M Hushchyn Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
D Hutchcroft Oliver Lodge Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
M Idzik AGH - University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, Kraków, Poland
D Ilin Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
P Ilten University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
A Inglessi Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
A Iniukhin Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
A Ishteev Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
K Ivshin Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
R Jacobsson European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
H Jage I. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
S J Jaimes Elles Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular, Centro Mixto Universidad de Valencia - CSIC, Valencia, Spain Departamento de Fisica, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogota, Colombia (associated with LPNHE, Sorbonne Université, Paris Diderot Sorbonne Paris Cité, CNRS/IN2P3, Paris, France)
S Jakobsen European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
E Jans Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics, Amsterdam, Netherlands
B K Jashal Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular, Centro Mixto Universidad de Valencia - CSIC, Valencia, Spain
A Jawahery University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
V Jevtic Fakultät Physik, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
E Jiang University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
X Jiang Institute Of High Energy Physics (IHEP), Beijing, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Y Jiang University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Y J Jiang School of Physics State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing, China
M John Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
D Johnson University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
C R Jones Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
T P Jones Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
S Joshi National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ), Warsaw, Poland
B Jost European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
N Jurik European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
I Juszczak Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland
D Kaminaris Institute of Physics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
S Kandybei NSC Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology (NSC KIPT), Kharkiv, Ukraine
Y Kang Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
M Karacson European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
D Karpenkov Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
M Karpov Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
A M Kauniskangas Institute of Physics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
J W Kautz University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
F Keizer European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
D M Keller Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA
M Kenzie Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
T Ketel Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics, Amsterdam, Netherlands
B Khanji Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA
A Kharisova Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
S Kholodenko INFN Sezione di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
G Khreich Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab, Orsay, France
T Kirn I. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
V S Kirsebom Institute of Physics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
O Kitouni Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
S Klaver Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
N Kleijne INFN Sezione di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
K Klimaszewski National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ), Warsaw, Poland
M R Kmiec National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ), Warsaw, Poland
S Koliiev Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR), Kyiv, Ukraine
L Kolk Fakultät Physik, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
A Konoplyannikov Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
P Kopciewicz AGH - University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, Kraków, Poland European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
P Koppenburg Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics, Amsterdam, Netherlands
M Korolev Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
I Kostiuk Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics, Amsterdam, Netherlands
O Kot Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR), Kyiv, Ukraine
S Kotriakhova School of Physics and Astronomy, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas (CBPF), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China Institute Of High Energy Physics (IHEP), Beijing, China School of Physics State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China Institute of Particle Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei, China Consejo Nacional de Rectores (CONARE), San Jose, Costa Rica Université Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, IN2P3-LAPP, Annecy, France Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS/IN2P3, LPC, Clermont-Ferrand, France Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS/IN2P3, CPPM, Marseille, France Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab, Orsay, France Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet, CNRS/IN2P3, Ecole Polytechnique, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, Palaiseau, France LPNHE, Sorbonne Université, Paris Diderot Sorbonne Paris Cité, CNRS/IN2P3, Paris, France I. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany Fakultät Physik, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK), Heidelberg, Germany Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany School of Physics, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland INFN Sezione di Bari, Bari, Italy INFN Sezione di Bologna, Bologna, Italy INFN Sezione di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy INFN Sezione di Firenze, Firenze, Italy INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Frascati, Italy INFN Sezione di Genova, Genova, Italy INFN Sezione di Milano, Milano, Italy INFN Sezione di Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy INFN Sezione di Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy Università degli Studi di Padova, Università e INFN, Padova, Padova, Italy INFN Sezione di Perugia, Perugia, Italy INFN Sezione di Pisa, Pisa, Italy INFN Sezione di Roma La Sapienza, Roma, Italy INFN Sezione di Roma Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics, Amsterdam, Netherlands Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands AGH - University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, Kraków, Poland Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ), Warsaw, Poland Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN DS4DS, La Salle, Universitat Ramon Llull, Barcelona, Spain ICCUB, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular, Centro Mixto Universidad de Valencia - CSIC, Valencia, Spain European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland Institute of Physics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland Physik-Institut, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland NSC Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology (NSC KIPT), Kharkiv, Ukraine Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR), Kyiv, Ukraine University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom H.H. Wills Physics Laboratory, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Didcot, United Kingdom School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom Oliver Lodge Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (associated with Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) School of Physics and Electronics, Hunan University, Changsha City, China (associated with Institute of Particle Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei, China) Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Nuclear Science, Guangdong-Hong Kong Joint Laboratory of Quantum Matter, Institute of Quantum Matter, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China (associated with Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China) Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China (associated with Institute Of High Energy Physics (IHEP), Beijing, China) School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China (associated with Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China) Departamento de Fisica, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogota, Colombia (associated with LPNHE, Sorbonne Université, Paris Diderot Sorbonne Paris Cité, CNRS/IN2P3, Paris, France) Universität Bonn - Helmholtz-Institut für Strahlen und Kernphysik, Bonn, Germany (associated with Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany) Eotvos Lorand University, Budapest, Hungary (associated with European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland) Van Swinderen Institute, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands (associated with Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics, Amsterdam, Netherlands) Universiteit Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands (associated with Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics, Amsterdam, Netherlands) Tadeusz Kosciuszko Cracow University of Technology, Cracow, Poland (associated with Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland) Department of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden (associated with School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom) University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA (associated with Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA) Departement de Physique Nucleaire (SPhN), Gif-Sur-Yvette, France
A Kozachuk Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
P Kravchenko Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
L Kravchuk Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
M Kreps Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
S Kretzschmar I. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
P Krokovny Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
W Krupa Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA
W Krzemien National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ), Warsaw, Poland
J Kubat Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
S Kubis Tadeusz Kosciuszko Cracow University of Technology, Cracow, Poland (associated with Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland)
W Kucewicz Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland
M Kucharczyk Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland
V Kudryavtsev Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
E Kulikova Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
A Kupsc Department of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden (associated with School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom)
B K Kutsenko Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS/IN2P3, CPPM, Marseille, France
D Lacarrere European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
A Lai INFN Sezione di Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy
A Lampis INFN Sezione di Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy
D Lancierini Physik-Institut, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
C Landesa Gomez Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
J J Lane School of Physics and Astronomy, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
R Lane H.H. Wills Physics Laboratory, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
C Langenbruch Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
J Langer Fakultät Physik, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
O Lantwin Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
T Latham Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
F Lazzari INFN Sezione di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
C Lazzeroni University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
R Le Gac Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS/IN2P3, CPPM, Marseille, France
S H Lee University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA (associated with Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA)
R Lefèvre Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS/IN2P3, LPC, Clermont-Ferrand, France
A Leflat Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
S Legotin Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
M Lehuraux Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
O Leroy Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS/IN2P3, CPPM, Marseille, France
T Lesiak Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland
B Leverington Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
A Li Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
H Li Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Nuclear Science, Guangdong-Hong Kong Joint Laboratory of Quantum Matter, Institute of Quantum Matter, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China (associated with Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China)
K Li Institute of Particle Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
L Li Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
P Li European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
P-R Li Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China (associated with Institute Of High Energy Physics (IHEP), Beijing, China)
S Li Institute of Particle Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
T Li Institute Of High Energy Physics (IHEP), Beijing, China
T Li Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Nuclear Science, Guangdong-Hong Kong Joint Laboratory of Quantum Matter, Institute of Quantum Matter, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China (associated with Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China)
Y Li Institute of Particle Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
Y Li Institute Of High Energy Physics (IHEP), Beijing, China
Z Li Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA
Z Lian Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
X Liang Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA
C Lin University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
T Lin STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Didcot, United Kingdom
R Lindner European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
V Lisovskyi Institute of Physics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
R Litvinov INFN Sezione di Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy
G Liu Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Nuclear Science, Guangdong-Hong Kong Joint Laboratory of Quantum Matter, Institute of Quantum Matter, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China (associated with Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China)
H Liu University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
K Liu Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China (associated with Institute Of High Energy Physics (IHEP), Beijing, China)
Q Liu University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
S Liu Institute Of High Energy Physics (IHEP), Beijing, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Y Liu School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Y Liu Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China (associated with Institute Of High Energy Physics (IHEP), Beijing, China)
Y L Liu Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
A Lobo Salvia ICCUB, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
A Loi INFN Sezione di Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy
J Lomba Castro Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
T Long Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
J H Lopes Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
A Lopez Huertas ICCUB, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
S López Soliño Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
G H Lovell Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
C Lucarelli INFN Sezione di Firenze, Firenze, Italy
D Lucchesi Università degli Studi di Padova, Università e INFN, Padova, Padova, Italy
S Luchuk Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
M Lucio Martinez Universiteit Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands (associated with Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics, Amsterdam, Netherlands)
V Lukashenko Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics, Amsterdam, Netherlands Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR), Kyiv, Ukraine
Y Luo Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
A Lupato Università degli Studi di Padova, Università e INFN, Padova, Padova, Italy
E Luppi INFN Sezione di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
K Lynch School of Physics, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
X-R Lyu University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
G M Ma Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
R Ma University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
S Maccolini Fakultät Physik, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
F Machefert Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab, Orsay, France
F Maciuc Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania
I Mackay Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
L R Madhan Mohan Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
M M Madurai University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
A Maevskiy Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
D Magdalinski Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics, Amsterdam, Netherlands
D Maisuzenko Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
M W Majewski AGH - University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, Kraków, Poland
J J Malczewski Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland
S Malde Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
B Malecki Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
L Malentacca European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
A Malinin Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
T Maltsev Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
G Manca INFN Sezione di Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy
G Mancinelli Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS/IN2P3, CPPM, Marseille, France
C Mancuso Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab, Orsay, France INFN Sezione di Milano, Milano, Italy
R Manera Escalero ICCUB, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
D Manuzzi INFN Sezione di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
D Marangotto INFN Sezione di Milano, Milano, Italy
J F Marchand Université Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, IN2P3-LAPP, Annecy, France
R Marchevski Institute of Physics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
U Marconi INFN Sezione di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
S Mariani European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
C Marin Benito ICCUB, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
J Marks Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
A M Marshall H.H. Wills Physics Laboratory, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
P J Marshall Oliver Lodge Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
G Martelli INFN Sezione di Perugia, Perugia, Italy
G Martellotti INFN Sezione di Roma La Sapienza, Roma, Italy
L Martinazzoli European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
M Martinelli INFN Sezione di Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy
D Martinez Santos Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
F Martinez Vidal Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular, Centro Mixto Universidad de Valencia - CSIC, Valencia, Spain
A Massafferri Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas (CBPF), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
M Materok I. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
R Matev European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
A Mathad Physik-Institut, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
V Matiunin Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
C Matteuzzi Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA
K R Mattioli Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet, CNRS/IN2P3, Ecole Polytechnique, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, Palaiseau, France
A Mauri Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
E Maurice Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet, CNRS/IN2P3, Ecole Polytechnique, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, Palaiseau, France
J Mauricio ICCUB, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
P Mayencourt Institute of Physics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
M Mazurek European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
M McCann Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
L Mcconnell School of Physics, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
T H McGrath Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
N T McHugh School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
A McNab Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
R McNulty School of Physics, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
B Meadows University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
G Meier Fakultät Physik, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
D Melnychuk National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ), Warsaw, Poland
M Merk Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics, Amsterdam, Netherlands Universiteit Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands (associated with Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics, Amsterdam, Netherlands)
A Merli INFN Sezione di Milano, Milano, Italy
L Meyer Garcia Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
D Miao Institute Of High Energy Physics (IHEP), Beijing, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
H Miao University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
M Mikhasenko Universität Bonn - Helmholtz-Institut für Strahlen und Kernphysik, Bonn, Germany (associated with Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany)
D A Milanes Departamento de Fisica, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogota, Colombia (associated with LPNHE, Sorbonne Université, Paris Diderot Sorbonne Paris Cité, CNRS/IN2P3, Paris, France)
A Minotti INFN Sezione di Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy
E Minucci Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA
T Miralles Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS/IN2P3, LPC, Clermont-Ferrand, France
S E Mitchell School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
B Mitreska Fakultät Physik, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
D S Mitzel Fakultät Physik, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
A Modak STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Didcot, United Kingdom
A Mödden Fakultät Physik, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
R A Mohammed Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
R D Moise I. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
S Mokhnenko Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
T Mombächer European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
M Monk School of Physics and Astronomy, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
I A Monroy Departamento de Fisica, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogota, Colombia (associated with LPNHE, Sorbonne Université, Paris Diderot Sorbonne Paris Cité, CNRS/IN2P3, Paris, France)
S Monteil Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS/IN2P3, LPC, Clermont-Ferrand, France
A Morcillo Gomez Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
G Morello INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Frascati, Italy
M J Morello INFN Sezione di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
M P Morgenthaler Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
J Moron AGH - University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, Kraków, Poland
A B Morris European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
A G Morris Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS/IN2P3, CPPM, Marseille, France
R Mountain Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA
H Mu Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
Z M Mu School of Physics State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing, China
E Muhammad Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
F Muheim School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
M Mulder Van Swinderen Institute, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands (associated with Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics, Amsterdam, Netherlands)
K Müller Physik-Institut, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
F Mũnoz-Rojas Consejo Nacional de Rectores (CONARE), San Jose, Costa Rica
R Murta Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
P Naik Oliver Lodge Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
T Nakada Institute of Physics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
R Nandakumar STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Didcot, United Kingdom
T Nanut European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
I Nasteva Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
M Needham School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
N Neri INFN Sezione di Milano, Milano, Italy
S Neubert Universität Bonn - Helmholtz-Institut für Strahlen und Kernphysik, Bonn, Germany (associated with Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany)
N Neufeld European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
P Neustroev Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
R Newcombe Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
J Nicolini Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab, Orsay, France Fakultät Physik, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
D Nicotra Universiteit Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands (associated with Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics, Amsterdam, Netherlands)
E M Niel Institute of Physics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
N Nikitin Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
P Nogga Universität Bonn - Helmholtz-Institut für Strahlen und Kernphysik, Bonn, Germany (associated with Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany)
N S Nolte Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
C Normand Université Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, IN2P3-LAPP, Annecy, France INFN Sezione di Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy
J Novoa Fernandez Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
G Nowak University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
C Nunez University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA (associated with Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA)
H N Nur School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
A Oblakowska-Mucha AGH - University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, Kraków, Poland
V Obraztsov Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
T Oeser I. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
S Okamura INFN Sezione di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
R Oldeman INFN Sezione di Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy
F Oliva School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
M Olocco Fakultät Physik, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
C J G Onderwater Universiteit Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands (associated with Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics, Amsterdam, Netherlands)
R H O'Neil School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
J M Otalora Goicochea Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
T Ovsiannikova Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
P Owen Physik-Institut, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
A Oyanguren Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular, Centro Mixto Universidad de Valencia - CSIC, Valencia, Spain
O Ozcelik School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
K O Padeken Universität Bonn - Helmholtz-Institut für Strahlen und Kernphysik, Bonn, Germany (associated with Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany)
B Pagare Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
P R Pais Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
T Pajero Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
A Palano INFN Sezione di Bari, Bari, Italy
M Palutan INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Frascati, Italy
G Panshin Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
L Paolucci Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
A Papanestis STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Didcot, United Kingdom
M Pappagallo INFN Sezione di Bari, Bari, Italy
L L Pappalardo INFN Sezione di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
C Pappenheimer University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
C Parkes Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
B Passalacqua INFN Sezione di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
G Passaleva INFN Sezione di Firenze, Firenze, Italy
D Passaro INFN Sezione di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
A Pastore INFN Sezione di Bari, Bari, Italy
M Patel Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
J Patoc Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
C Patrignani INFN Sezione di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
C J Pawley Universiteit Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands (associated with Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics, Amsterdam, Netherlands)
A Pellegrino Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics, Amsterdam, Netherlands
M Pepe Altarelli INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Frascati, Italy
S Perazzini INFN Sezione di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
D Pereima Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
A Pereiro Castro Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
P Perret Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS/IN2P3, LPC, Clermont-Ferrand, France
A Perro European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
K Petridis H.H. Wills Physics Laboratory, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
A Petrolini INFN Sezione di Genova, Genova, Italy
S Petrucci School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
H Pham Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA
L Pica INFN Sezione di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
M Piccini INFN Sezione di Perugia, Perugia, Italy
B Pietrzyk Université Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, IN2P3-LAPP, Annecy, France
G Pietrzyk Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab, Orsay, France
D Pinci INFN Sezione di Roma La Sapienza, Roma, Italy
F Pisani European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
M Pizzichemi INFN Sezione di Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy
V Placinta Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania
M Plo Casasus Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
F Polci LPNHE, Sorbonne Université, Paris Diderot Sorbonne Paris Cité, CNRS/IN2P3, Paris, France European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
M Poli Lener INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Frascati, Italy
A Poluektov Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS/IN2P3, CPPM, Marseille, France
N Polukhina Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
I Polyakov European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
E Polycarpo Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
S Ponce European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
D Popov University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
S Poslavskii Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
K Prasanth Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland
C Prouve Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
V Pugatch Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR), Kyiv, Ukraine
V Puill Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab, Orsay, France
G Punzi INFN Sezione di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
H R Qi Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
W Qian University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
N Qin Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
S Qu Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
R Quagliani Institute of Physics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
R I Rabadan Trejo Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
B Rachwal AGH - University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, Kraków, Poland
J H Rademacker H.H. Wills Physics Laboratory, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
M Rama INFN Sezione di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
M Ramírez García University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA (associated with Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA)
M Ramos Pernas Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
M S Rangel Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
F Ratnikov Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
G Raven Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
M Rebollo De Miguel Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular, Centro Mixto Universidad de Valencia - CSIC, Valencia, Spain
F Redi European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
J Reich H.H. Wills Physics Laboratory, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
F Reiss Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
Z Ren University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
P K Resmi Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
R Ribatti INFN Sezione di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
G R Ricart Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet, CNRS/IN2P3, Ecole Polytechnique, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, Palaiseau, France Departement de Physique Nucleaire (SPhN), Gif-Sur-Yvette, France
D Riccardi INFN Sezione di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
S Ricciardi STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Didcot, United Kingdom
K Richardson Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
M Richardson-Slipper School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
K Rinnert Oliver Lodge Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
P Robbe Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab, Orsay, France
G Robertson School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
E Rodrigues European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland Oliver Lodge Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
E Rodriguez Fernandez Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
J A Rodriguez Lopez Departamento de Fisica, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogota, Colombia (associated with LPNHE, Sorbonne Université, Paris Diderot Sorbonne Paris Cité, CNRS/IN2P3, Paris, France)
E Rodriguez Rodriguez Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
A Rogovskiy STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Didcot, United Kingdom
D L Rolf European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
A Rollings Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
P Roloff European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
V Romanovskiy Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
M Romero Lamas Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
A Romero Vidal Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
G Romolini INFN Sezione di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
F Ronchetti Institute of Physics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
M Rotondo INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Frascati, Italy
S R Roy Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
M S Rudolph Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA
T Ruf European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
M Ruiz Diaz Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
R A Ruiz Fernandez Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
J Ruiz Vidal Department of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden (associated with School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom)
A Ryzhikov Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
J Ryzka AGH - University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, Kraków, Poland
J J Saborido Silva Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
R Sadek Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet, CNRS/IN2P3, Ecole Polytechnique, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, Palaiseau, France
N Sagidova Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
N Sahoo University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
B Saitta INFN Sezione di Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy
M Salomoni INFN Sezione di Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy
C Sanchez Gras Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics, Amsterdam, Netherlands
I Sanderswood Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular, Centro Mixto Universidad de Valencia - CSIC, Valencia, Spain
R Santacesaria INFN Sezione di Roma La Sapienza, Roma, Italy
C Santamarina Rios Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
M Santimaria INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Frascati, Italy
L Santoro Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas (CBPF), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
E Santovetti INFN Sezione di Roma Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy
A Saputi INFN Sezione di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
D Saranin Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
G Sarpis School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
M Sarpis Universität Bonn - Helmholtz-Institut für Strahlen und Kernphysik, Bonn, Germany (associated with Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany)
A Sarti INFN Sezione di Roma La Sapienza, Roma, Italy
C Satriano INFN Sezione di Roma La Sapienza, Roma, Italy
A Satta INFN Sezione di Roma Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy
M Saur School of Physics State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing, China
D Savrina Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
H Sazak Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS/IN2P3, LPC, Clermont-Ferrand, France
L G Scantlebury Smead Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
A Scarabotto LPNHE, Sorbonne Université, Paris Diderot Sorbonne Paris Cité, CNRS/IN2P3, Paris, France
S Schael I. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
S Scherl Oliver Lodge Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
A M Schertz Eotvos Lorand University, Budapest, Hungary (associated with European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland)
M Schiller School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
H Schindler European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
M Schmelling Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK), Heidelberg, Germany
B Schmidt European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
S Schmitt I. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
H Schmitz Universität Bonn - Helmholtz-Institut für Strahlen und Kernphysik, Bonn, Germany (associated with Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany)
O Schneider Institute of Physics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
A Schopper European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
N Schulte Fakultät Physik, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
S Schulte Institute of Physics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
M H Schune Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab, Orsay, France
R Schwemmer European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
G Schwering I. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
B Sciascia INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Frascati, Italy
A Sciuccati European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
S Sellam Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
A Semennikov Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
M Senghi Soares Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
A Sergi INFN Sezione di Genova, Genova, Italy
N Serra European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland Physik-Institut, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
L Sestini Università degli Studi di Padova, Università e INFN, Padova, Padova, Italy
A Seuthe Fakultät Physik, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
Y Shang School of Physics State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing, China
D M Shangase University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA (associated with Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA)
M Shapkin Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
I Shchemerov Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
L Shchutska Institute of Physics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
T Shears Oliver Lodge Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
L Shekhtman Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
Z Shen School of Physics State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing, China
S Sheng Institute Of High Energy Physics (IHEP), Beijing, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
V Shevchenko Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
B Shi University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
E B Shields INFN Sezione di Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy
Y Shimizu Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab, Orsay, France
E Shmanin Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
R Shorkin Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
J D Shupperd Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA
R Silva Coutinho Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA
G Simi Università degli Studi di Padova, Università e INFN, Padova, Padova, Italy
S Simone INFN Sezione di Bari, Bari, Italy
N Skidmore Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
R Skuza Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
T Skwarnicki Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA
M W Slater University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
J C Smallwood Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
E Smith Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
K Smith Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA
M Smith Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
A Snoch Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics, Amsterdam, Netherlands
L Soares Lavra School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
M D Sokoloff University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
F J P Soler School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
A Solomin Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN H.H. Wills Physics Laboratory, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
A Solovev Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
I Solovyev Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
R Song School of Physics and Astronomy, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
Y Song Institute of Physics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
Y Song Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
Y S Song School of Physics State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing, China
F L Souza De Almeida Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA
B Souza De Paula Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
E Spadaro Norella INFN Sezione di Milano, Milano, Italy
E Spedicato INFN Sezione di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
J G Speer Fakultät Physik, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
E Spiridenkov Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
P Spradlin School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
V Sriskaran European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
F Stagni European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
M Stahl European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
S Stahl European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
S Stanislaus Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
E N Stein European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
O Steinkamp Physik-Institut, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
O Stenyakin Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
H Stevens Fakultät Physik, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
D Strekalina Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
Y Su University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
F Suljik Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
J Sun INFN Sezione di Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy
L Sun School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China (associated with Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China)
Y Sun University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
P N Swallow University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
K Swientek AGH - University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, Kraków, Poland
F Swystun Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
A Szabelski National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ), Warsaw, Poland
T Szumlak AGH - University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, Kraków, Poland
M Szymanski European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
Y Tan Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
S Taneja Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
M D Tat Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
A Terentev Physik-Institut, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
F Terzuoli INFN Sezione di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
F Teubert European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
E Thomas European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
D J D Thompson University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
H Tilquin Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
V Tisserand Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS/IN2P3, LPC, Clermont-Ferrand, France
S T'Jampens Université Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, IN2P3-LAPP, Annecy, France
M Tobin Institute Of High Energy Physics (IHEP), Beijing, China
L Tomassetti INFN Sezione di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
G Tonani INFN Sezione di Milano, Milano, Italy
X Tong School of Physics State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing, China
D Torres Machado Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas (CBPF), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
L Toscano Fakultät Physik, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
D Y Tou Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
C Trippl DS4DS, La Salle, Universitat Ramon Llull, Barcelona, Spain
G Tuci Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
N Tuning Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics, Amsterdam, Netherlands
L H Uecker Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
A Ukleja AGH - University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, Kraków, Poland
D J Unverzagt Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
E Ursov Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
A Usachov Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
A Ustyuzhanin Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
U Uwer Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
V Vagnoni INFN Sezione di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
A Valassi European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
G Valenti INFN Sezione di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
N Valls Canudas DS4DS, La Salle, Universitat Ramon Llull, Barcelona, Spain
H Van Hecke Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA
E van Herwijnen Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
C B Van Hulse Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
R Van Laak Institute of Physics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
M van Veghel Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics, Amsterdam, Netherlands
R Vazquez Gomez ICCUB, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
P Vazquez Regueiro Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
C Vázquez Sierra Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
S Vecchi INFN Sezione di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
J J Velthuis H.H. Wills Physics Laboratory, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
M Veltri INFN Sezione di Firenze, Firenze, Italy
A Venkateswaran Institute of Physics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
M Vesterinen Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
D Vieira University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
M Vieites Diaz European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
X Vilasis-Cardona DS4DS, La Salle, Universitat Ramon Llull, Barcelona, Spain
E Vilella Figueras Oliver Lodge Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
A Villa INFN Sezione di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
P Vincent LPNHE, Sorbonne Université, Paris Diderot Sorbonne Paris Cité, CNRS/IN2P3, Paris, France
F C Volle Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab, Orsay, France
D Vom Bruch Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS/IN2P3, CPPM, Marseille, France
V Vorobyev Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
N Voropaev Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
K Vos Universiteit Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands (associated with Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics, Amsterdam, Netherlands)
G Vouters Université Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, IN2P3-LAPP, Annecy, France
C Vrahas School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
J Walsh INFN Sezione di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
E J Walton School of Physics and Astronomy, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
G Wan School of Physics State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing, China
C Wang Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
G Wang Institute of Particle Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
J Wang School of Physics State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing, China
J Wang Institute Of High Energy Physics (IHEP), Beijing, China
J Wang Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
J Wang School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China (associated with Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China)
M Wang INFN Sezione di Milano, Milano, Italy
N W Wang University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
R Wang H.H. Wills Physics Laboratory, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
X Wang Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Nuclear Science, Guangdong-Hong Kong Joint Laboratory of Quantum Matter, Institute of Quantum Matter, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China (associated with Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China)
X W Wang Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
Y Wang Institute of Particle Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
Z Wang Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab, Orsay, France
Z Wang Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
Z Wang University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
J A Ward School of Physics and Astronomy, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
N K Watson University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
D Websdale Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
Y Wei School of Physics State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing, China
B D C Westhenry H.H. Wills Physics Laboratory, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
D J White Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
M Whitehead School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
A R Wiederhold Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
D Wiedner Fakultät Physik, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
G Wilkinson Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
M K Wilkinson University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
M Williams Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
M R J Williams School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
R Williams Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
F F Wilson STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Didcot, United Kingdom
W Wislicki National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ), Warsaw, Poland
M Witek Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland
L Witola Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
C P Wong Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA
G Wormser Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab, Orsay, France
S A Wotton Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
H Wu Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA
J Wu Institute of Particle Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
Y Wu School of Physics State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing, China
K Wyllie European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
S Xian Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Nuclear Science, Guangdong-Hong Kong Joint Laboratory of Quantum Matter, Institute of Quantum Matter, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China (associated with Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China)
Z Xiang Institute Of High Energy Physics (IHEP), Beijing, China
Y Xie Institute of Particle Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
A Xu INFN Sezione di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
J Xu University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
L Xu Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
L Xu Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
M Xu Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
Z Xu Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS/IN2P3, LPC, Clermont-Ferrand, France
Z Xu University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Z Xu Institute Of High Energy Physics (IHEP), Beijing, China
D Yang Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
S Yang University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
X Yang School of Physics State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing, China
Y Yang INFN Sezione di Genova, Genova, Italy
Z Yang School of Physics State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing, China
Z Yang University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
V Yeroshenko Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab, Orsay, France
H Yeung Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
H Yin Institute of Particle Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
C Y Yu School of Physics State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing, China
J Yu School of Physics and Electronics, Hunan University, Changsha City, China (associated with Institute of Particle Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei, China)
X Yuan Institute Of High Energy Physics (IHEP), Beijing, China
E Zaffaroni Institute of Physics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
M Zavertyaev Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK), Heidelberg, Germany
M Zdybal Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland
M Zeng Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
C Zhang School of Physics State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing, China
D Zhang Institute of Particle Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
J Zhang University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
L Zhang Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
S Zhang School of Physics and Electronics, Hunan University, Changsha City, China (associated with Institute of Particle Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei, China)
S Zhang School of Physics State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing, China
Y Zhang School of Physics State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing, China
Y Zhang Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
Y Z Zhang Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
Y Zhao Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
A Zharkova Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
A Zhelezov Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
X Z Zheng Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
Y Zheng University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
T Zhou School of Physics State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing, China
X Zhou Institute of Particle Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
Y Zhou University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
V Zhovkovska Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
L Z Zhu University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
X Zhu Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
X Zhu Institute of Particle Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
Z Zhu University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
V Zhukov I. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
J Zhuo Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular, Centro Mixto Universidad de Valencia - CSIC, Valencia, Spain
Q Zou Institute Of High Energy Physics (IHEP), Beijing, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
D Zuliani Università degli Studi di Padova, Università e INFN, Padova, Padova, Italy
G Zunica Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom

Collapse

Scalable parallel ultrafast optical random bit generation based on a single chaotic microcomb

Random bit generators are critical for information security, cryptography, stochastic modeling, and simulations. Speed and scalability are key challenges faced by current physical random bit generation. Herein, we propose a massively parallel scheme for ultrafast random bit generation towards rates of order 100 terabit per second based on a single micro-ring resonator. A modulation-instability-driven chaotic comb in a micro-ring resonator enables the simultaneous generation of hundreds of independent and unbiased random bit streams. A proof-of-concept experiment demonstrates that using our method, random bit streams beyond 2 terabit per second can be successfully generated with only 7 comb lines. This bit rate can be easily enhanced by further increasing the number of comb lines used. Our approach provides a chip-scale solution to random bit generation for secure communication and high-performance computation, and offers superhigh speed and large scalability.

Effect of free radicals on rheological properties, antioxidant activity, and molecular conformation of chitosan under solution pulsed plasma process based on radical scavengers

Radical scavengers were employed to evaluate the influence of various active species (•OH, •O, and H2O2) on the rheological properties, antioxidant activity, and molecular conformation of chitosan under solution plasma process (SPP) degradation. ESR analysis showed that •OH and •O radicals played important roles in SPP degradation. The results of rheological properties and antioxidant activity indicated that the •OH scavenger (tert-butanol), •O scavenger (1, 4-benzoquinone), and H2O2 scavenger (MnO2) remarkably inhibited the decrease of G' and G" of the degraded chitosan, the formation of gel structure, and the increase of antioxidant activity. The analysis of molecular conformation of the chitosan by particle size analysis, atomic force microscopy (AFM), and high performance size exclusion chromatography coupled with multi-angle laser light scattering (HPSEC-MALLS) revealed that the decrease of particle size, molecular aggregation, and molecular weight of chitosan was inhibited after the addition of radical scavengers. An evident effect of radical scavengers on the hard sphere conformation of chitosan was observed. It was found that the above effects were strongly dependent on the scavenger concentration. These results proved that •OH, •O, and H2O2 played important roles in SPP treatment. For the rheological properties and molecular conformation, H2O2 exhibited the greatest impact. For the antioxidant activity and molecular weight, •OH presented the biggest influence. Besides, •O expressed the weakest effect. This study will be beneficial to reveal the action mechanisms of SPP technology to the degradation of chitosan.

Observation of Cabibbo-Suppressed Two-Body Hadronic Decays and Precision Mass Measurement of the Ω_{c}^{0} Baryon

The first observation of the singly Cabibbo-suppressed Ω_{c}^{0}→Ω^{-}K^{+} and Ω_{c}^{0}→Ξ^{-}π^{+} decays is reported, using proton-proton collision data at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 5.4  fb^{-1}, collected with the LHCb detector between 2016 and 2018. The branching fraction ratios are measured to be B(Ω_{c}^{0}→Ω^{-}K^{+})/B(Ω_{c}^{0}→Ω^{-}π^{+})=[6.08±0.51(stat)±0.40(syst)]%,B(Ω_{c}^{0}→Ξ^{-}π^{+})/B(Ω_{c}^{0}→Ω^{-}π^{+})=[15.81±0.87(stat)±0.44(syst)±0.16(ext)]%. In addition, using the Ω_{c}^{0}→Ω^{-}π^{+} decay channel, the Ω_{c}^{0} baryon mass is measured to be M(Ω_{c}^{0})=2695.28±0.07(stat)±0.27(syst)±0.30(ext)  MeV, improving the precision of the previous world average by a factor of 4.

Enhanced Production of Λ_{b}^{0} Baryons in High-Multiplicity pp Collisions at sqrt[s]=13 TeV

The production rate of Λ_{b}^{0} baryons relative to B^{0} mesons in pp collisions at a center-of-mass energy sqrt[s]=13  TeV is measured by the LHCb experiment. The ratio of Λ_{b}^{0} to B^{0} production cross sections shows a significant dependence on both the transverse momentum and the measured charged-particle multiplicity. At low multiplicity, the ratio measured at LHCb is consistent with the value measured in e^{+}e^{-} collisions, and increases by a factor of ∼2 with increasing multiplicity. At relatively low transverse momentum, the ratio of Λ_{b}^{0} to B^{0} cross sections is higher than what is measured in e^{+}e^{-} collisions, but converges with the e^{+}e^{-} ratio as the momentum increases. These results imply that the evolution of heavy b quarks into final-state hadrons is influenced by the density of the hadronic environment produced in the collision. Comparisons with several models and implications for the mechanisms enforcing quark confinement are discussed.

Direct chemical-vapor-deposition growth of alloyed perovskite microcrystals for tunable emissions

Tunable composition of perovskite micro/nanostructures are perfect candidate for the designing of multifunctional optoelectronic circuits. Especially, integrated polychromatic luminescence based on the perovskite materials along a single substrate or chip is essential to the integrated photonic devices and multicolor displays. Here, we reported a synthesis of composition tunable CsPbI3(1-x)Br3x(X = 0.65-0.9) perovskite microstructures on a single substrate via a magnetic-pulling CVD method. The PL emissions can be changed gradually from green (558 nm, 2.23 eV) to red (610 nm, 2.03 eV) under a focused 375 nm laser illumination. Furthermore, these composition-graded alloyed perovskite microcrystals show stable emissions after six months in air, which may find applications in multicolor display and broad band light sources in the future.

[A case of fungal keratitis caused by Petriella setifera infection]

The patient, a 66-year-old male, suffered from redness, blurred vision, photophobia, and tearing in the right eye after being injured by a wooden board. Anti-inflammatory treatment showed poor effectiveness. A 4 mm × 4 mm infiltrate with white deposits on the surface was observed in the central cornea of the right eye. Microscopic examination of corneal scrapings, fungal culture, and in vivo confocal microscopy all indicated fungal infection. The isolated strain was identified as Scedosporium apiospermum through microscopic morphology and confirmed as Petriella setifera by gene sequencing. The patient received corneal debridement combined with routine anti-inflammatory and antifungal treatment in the outpatient clinic. During the follow-up period, the condition continued to improve. Slit lamp examination at the revisit 40 days after the initial diagnosis revealed thinning of the corneal stroma, basic healing of the epithelium, and an increase in uncorrected visual acuity from 0.3 to 0.6.

The role of type VI secretion system genes in antibiotic resistance and virulence in Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates

Introduction

The type VI secretion system (T6SS) is a crucial virulence factor in the nosocomial pathogen Acinetobacter baumannii. However, its association with drug resistance is less well known. Notably, the roles that different T6SS components play in the process of antimicrobial resistance, as well as in virulence, have not been systematically revealed.

Methods

The importance of three representative T6SS core genes involved in the drug resistance and virulence of A. baumannii, namely, tssB, tssD (hcp), and tssM was elucidated.

Results

A higher ratio of the three core genes was detected in drug-resistant strains than in susceptible strains among our 114 A. baumannii clinical isolates. Upon deletion of tssB in AB795639, increased antimicrobial resistance to cefuroxime and ceftriaxone was observed, alongside reduced resistance to gentamicin. The ΔtssD mutant showed decreased resistance to ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, ofloxacin, tetracycline, and doxycycline, but increased resistance to tobramycin and streptomycin. The tssM-lacking mutant showed an increased sensitivity to ofloxacin, polymyxin B, and furazolidone. In addition, a significant reduction in biofilm formation was observed only with the ΔtssM mutant. Moreover, the ΔtssM strain, followed by the ΔtssD mutant, showed decreased survival in human serum, with attenuated competition with Escherichia coli and impaired lethality in Galleria mellonella.

Discussion

The above results suggest that T6SS plays an important role, participating in the antibiotic resistance of A. baumannii, especially in terms of intrinsic resistance. Meanwhile, tssM and tssD contribute to bacterial virulence to a greater degree, with tssM being associated with greater importance.

Improved Measurement of CP Violation Parameters in B_{s}^{0}→J/ψK^{+}K^{-} Decays in the Vicinity of the ϕ(1020) Resonance

The decay-time-dependent CP asymmetry in B_{s}^{0}→J/ψ(→μ^{+}μ^{-})K^{+}K^{-} decays is measured using proton-proton collision data, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 6  fb^{-1}, collected with the LHCb detector at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. Using a sample of approximately 349 000 B_{s}^{0} signal decays with an invariant K^{+}K^{-} mass in the vicinity of the ϕ(1020) resonance, the CP-violating phase ϕ_{s} is measured, along with the difference in decay widths of the light and heavy mass eigenstates of the B_{s}^{0}-B[over ¯]_{s}^{0} system, ΔΓ_{s}, and the difference of the average B_{s}^{0} and B^{0} meson decay widths, Γ_{s}-Γ_{d}. The values obtained are ϕ_{s}=-0.039±0.022±0.006  rad, ΔΓ_{s}=0.0845±0.0044±0.0024  ps^{-1}, and Γ_{s}-Γ_{d}=-0.0056_{-0.0015}^{+0.0013}±0.0014  ps^{-1}, where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second systematic. These are the most precise single measurements to date and are consistent with expectations based on the Standard Model and with the previous LHCb analyses of this decay. These results are combined with previous independent LHCb measurements. The phase ϕ_{s} is also measured independently for each polarization state of the K^{+}K^{-} system and shows no evidence for polarization dependence.

Retrospective analysis of the clinical significance of Ro52/TRIM21 antibody and specific antinuclear antibody patterns by indirect immunofluorescence

Objectives

To determine the clinical significance of Ro52 protein/tripartite motif-containing 21 antibody and specific antinuclear antibody patterns using indirect immunofluorescence technique.

METHODS

The retrospective study was conducted at the clinical laboratory of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, China, and comprised data from January 2017 to December 2021 of patients who underwent antinuclear antibody and anti-extractable nuclear antigen antibody detection. Inpatients with Ro52 antibody-positive status were taken as the cases, while anti-Ro52 negative patients with clear clinical diagnosis were taken as the controls. Data was analysed using SPSS 19.

RESULTS

There were 1802 cases and 1211 controls. Positive Ro52 showed significantly greater frequency in patients with primary Sjogren's syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus, inflammatory myositis, dry eyes and interstitial lung disease (p<0.05). Ro52 antibody showed high positive predictive value for primary Sjogren's syndrome 25(96.15%), systemic lupus erythematosus 259(91.20%), connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease 45(86.67%) and inflammatory myositis 60(86.67%). Antinuclear antibody indirect immunofluorescence patterns most frequently detected were nuclear speckled 128(40.89%) and cytoplasmic speckled 126(40.26%) (p<0.05). Interstitial lung disease was associated with the presence of cytoplasmic speckled antinuclear antibody indirect immunofluorescence pattern 24(19.2%), while tumours 47(36.5%) and hepatitis B 26(20.3%) seemed to be more frequent with nuclear speckled pattern (p<0.05). The simultaneous reactivity extractable nuclear antigen antibodies most frequently detected were antinuclear antibody+Ro52+anti-Sjogren's syndrome A+ 558(33.96%).

CONCLUSIONS

Ro52 antibody positivity was found to be associated with Sjogren's syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus, inflammatory myositis, dry eye and interstitial lung disease. The antinuclear antibody immunofluorescence pattern of Ro52 positive was single and primarily granular cytoplasm type. Antinuclear antibody negative and Ro52 positive in the serum of patients also had certain significance in auxiliary disease diagnosis.

Intestinal Translocation of Live Porphyromonas gingivalis Drives Insulin Resistance

Periodontitis has been emphasized as a risk factor of insulin resistance-related systemic diseases. Accumulating evidence has suggested a possible "oral-gut axis" linking oral infection and extraoral diseases, but it remains unclear whether periodontal pathogens can survive the barriers of the digestive tract and how they play their pathogenic roles. The present study established a periodontitis mouse model through oral ligature plus Porphyromonas gingivalis inoculation and demonstrated that periodontitis aggravated diet-induced obesity and insulin resistance, while also causing P. gingivalis enrichment in the intestine. Metabolic labeling strategy validated that P. gingivalis could translocate to the gastrointestinal tract in a viable state. Oral administration of living P. gingivalis elicited insulin resistance, while administration of pasteurized P. gingivalis had no such effect. Combination analysis of metagenome sequencing and nontargeted metabolomics suggested that the tryptophan metabolism pathway, specifically indole and its derivatives, was involved in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance caused by oral administration of living P. gingivalis. Moreover, liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry analysis confirmed that the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) ligands, mainly indole acetic acid, tryptamine, and indole-3-aldehyde, were reduced in diet-induced obese mice with periodontitis, leading to inactivation of AhR signaling. Supplementation with Ficz (6-formylindolo (3,2-b) carbazole), an AhR agonist, alleviated periodontitis-associated insulin resistance, in which the restoration of gut barrier function might play an important role. Collectively, these findings reveal that the oral-gut translocation of viable P. gingivalis works as a fuel linking periodontitis and insulin resistance, in which reduction of AhR ligands and inactivation of AhR signaling are involved. This study provides novel insight into the role of the oral-gut axis in the pathogenesis of periodontitis-associated comorbidities.

Aging of plastics in aquatic environments: Pathways, environmental behavior, ecological impacts, analyses and quantifications

The ubiquity of plastics in our environment has brought about pressing concerns, with their aging processes, photo-oxidation, mechanical abrasion, and biodegradation, being at the forefront. Microplastics (MPs), whether originating from plastic degradation or direct anthropogenic sources, further complicate this landscape. This review delves into the intricate aging dynamics of plastics in aquatic environments under various influential factors. We discuss the physicochemical changes that occur in aged plastics and the release of oxidation products during their degradation. Particular attention is given to their evolving environmental interactions and the resulting ecotoxicological implications. A rigorous evaluation is also conducted for methodologies in the analysis and quantification of plastics aging, identifying their merits and limitations and suggesting potential avenues for future research. This comprehensive review is able to illuminate the complexities of plastics aging, charting a path for future research and aiding in the formulation of informed policy decisions.

A novel "off-on" ratiometric fluorescent aptasensor for adenosine detection based on FRET between quantum dots and graphene oxide

A novel "off-on" ratiometric fluorescent aptasensor was established for adenosine detection based on fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) between CdS QDs, DNA QDs as donor and graphene oxide (GO) as acceptor. Amino-riched DNA QDs covalently bonded to the carboxyl group on the edge of the GO, and with the absorption of the TGA-modified CdS QDs with aptamer (CdS QDs-apt) onto the GO surface via the π-π stacking interaction. The fluorescence of both CdS QDs and DNA QDs were efficiently quenched due to FRET (turn off). When adenosine was present, the specific binding of the aptamer to the target preferentially that released the CdS QDs-apt from GO. The process would inhibit the FRET which contribute to the fluorescence of CdS QDs-apt recovery again (turn on), while the fluorescence intensity of DNA QDs only slightly altered and acted as the reference signal. Thus, a novel "off-on" ratiometric fluorescent aptasensor for adenosine detection was constructed accordingly. There was a good linearity relationship between the ratio of the FL intensity (F595 nm/F464 nm) and the concentration of adenosine in the range of 20.00-180.0 nmol/L with a detection limit of 1.3 nmol/L (S/N = 3, n = 9). Importantly, the feasibility of the developed aptasensor for selective detection of adenosine in serum and urine samples with satisfactory results. The recoveries were observed to be 97.04-100.2 %.

Measurement of CP Violation in B^{0}→ψ(→ℓ^{+}ℓ^{-})K_{S}^{0}(→π^{+}π^{-}) Decays

A measurement of time-dependent CP violation in the decays of B^{0} and B[over ¯]^{0} mesons to the final states J/ψ(→μ^{+}μ^{-})K_{S}^{0}, ψ(2S)(→μ^{+}μ^{-})K_{S}^{0} and J/ψ(→e^{+}e^{-})K_{S}^{0} with K_{S}^{0}→π^{+}π^{-} is presented. The data correspond to an integrated luminosity of 6  fb^{-1} collected at a center-of-mass energy of sqrt[s]=13  TeV with the LHCb detector. The CP-violation parameters are measured to be S_{ψK_{S}^{0}}=0.717±0.013(stat)±0.008(syst) and C_{ψK_{S}^{0}}=0.008±0.012(stat)±0.003(syst). This measurement of S_{ψK_{S}^{0}} represents the most precise single measurement of the CKM angle β to date and is more precise than the current world average. In addition, measurements of the CP-violation parameters of the individual channels are reported and a combination with the LHCb Run 1 measurements is performed.

Excision of Greater Superficial Petrosal Nerve Schwannoma Via a Pure Endoscopic Endonasal Approach

Greater superficial petrosal nerve (GSPN) schwannomas are an exceedingly rare nerve sheath tumor. The current literature search was conducted using Medline and Embase database by key search terms. Only 31 cases have been reported in the literature so far. Facial palsy, hearing loss, and xerophthalmia accounted for 48.4% (15), 41.9% (13), and 29% (9) of all cases, respectively. The middle cranial fossa approach was used in all previous reports. A retrospective review of 2 GSPN schwannomas patients treated by endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) in our center was collected. Clinical records, including clinical features, pre- and postoperative images, surgery, and follow-up information, were reviewed. In all cases, clinical features including facial numbness and headache were found, with tinnitus in case 1, hearing loss, xerophthalmia in case 2. Imaging studies showed a solid mass that originated in the anterior of the petrous bone. Two patients were treated by EEA. Furthermore, no recurrence was found during the follow-up period (15-29 months) in both of the 2 cases after the operation. Complete resection of GSPN schwannomas can be achieved via the pure EEA. Endoscopic endonasal approach for radical removal of tumors is safe and feasible.

Air particulate pollution exposure associated with impaired cognition via microbiota gut-brain axis: an evidence from rural elderly female in northwest China

This study aimed to reveal harm of exposure to indoor air pollution to cognitive function through "gut-brain-axis" among rural elderly residents. There were 120 participants recruited in rural villages of northwest China from December 2021 to February 2022. The cognitive level was assessed by eight-item ascertain dementia (AD) questionnaire, and indoor air pollution exposure was measured by air quality sensor. Inflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress-related index were detected in blood serum. Fecal samples were collected for gut microbiota analysis. The 120 participants were divided into impaired cognition (AD8) (81/67.5%) and cognition normal (NG) (39/32.5%). And there had more female in AD8 (FAD) (55/67.9%) than NG (FNG) (18/46.2%) (P = 0.003). Exposure of air pollution in FAD was higher than FNG (PM1, PM2.5, PM10, P < 0.001; NO2, P < 0.001; CO, P = 0.014; O3, P = 0.002). The risk of cognitive impairment increases 6.8%, 3.6%, 2.6%, 11%, and 2.4% in female for every 1 μg/m3 increased in exposure of PM1, PM2.5, PM10, NO2, and O3, separately. And GSH-Px and T-SOD in FAD were significantly lower than the FNG group (P = 0.011, P = 0.019). Gut microbiota in FAD is disordered with lower richness and diversity. Relative abundance of core bacteria Faecalibacterium (top 1 genus) in FAD was reduced (13.65% vs 19.81%, P = 0.0235), while Escherichia_Shigella and Akkermansia was increased. Correlation analysis showed Faecalibacterium was negatively correlated with age, and exposure of O3, PM1, PM2.5, and PM10; Akkermansia and Monoglobus were positively correlated with exposure of PM1, PM2.5 and PM10; Escherichia_Shigella was significantly positively correlated with NO2. Indoor air pollution exposure impaired cognitive function in elderly people, especially female, which may cause systemic inflammation, dysbiosis of the gut microbiota, and ultimately leading to early cognitive impairment through the gut-brain axis.

Clinical Observation of Various Types of Idiopathic Hypertrophic Cranial Pachymeningitis

BACKGROUND

To assist doctors in making better treatment decisions and improve patient prognosis, it is important to determine which therapy modalities are suitable for various forms of idiopathic hypertrophic cranial pachymeningitis (IHCP).

METHODS

All cases were received from the hospital medical record system, and some follow-up information was gathered through telephone follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 26 patients, 14 men and 12 women, with ages ranging from 20 to 73 years and a mean of 47.42 years, were included in the research. Regular types were less likely to recur than irregular and nodular types, focal types were less likely to recur than diffuse types, and corticosteroid-refractory types were more likely to recur than corticosteroid-sensitive types.

CONCLUSIONS

The extent and shape of the lesion and susceptibility to corticosteroids are potential factors that could influence recurrence. Futhermore, this paper also proposes the fibroblasts as a new therapeutic target which may improve the quality of prognostic survival of patients.

[Analysis of advanced fibrosis in metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease patients with chronic hepatitis B]

Objective: To investigate the clinical and pathological characteristics of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) with metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD), as well as associations with advanced fibrosis. Methods: CHB patients who underwent liver biopsy at Tianjin Second People's Hospital from June 2016 to September 2019 were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups based on whether they had concomitant MAFLD; a CHB group and a MAFLD-CHB group. t-tests and Chi-square tests were used to compare pathological characteristics and basic features in the two groups. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze factors associated with advanced fibrosis. Results: The CHB group included 110 patients, and the MAFLD-CHB group included 272 patients. There were significant differences in smoking, alcohol consumption, hypertension incidence, body metabolic index, alanine aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein, fasting plasma glucose, and platelets (PLT) between the two groups (all P<0.05). The MAFLD-CHB group had a higher incidence of advanced fibrosis than the CHB group (P<0.05). In logistic regression analysis MAFLD [odds ratio (OR)=2.204, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.018-4.774, P=0.045], GGT (OR=1.008, 95%CI 1.002-1.013, P=0.005), and PLT (OR=0.995, 95%CI 0.991-0.999, P=0.019) were associated with advanced fibrosis (all P<0.05). In the MAFLD-CHB group type 2 diabetes (OR=3.281, 95%CI 1.375-7.832, P=0.007), GGT (OR=1.011, 95%CI 1.003-1.018, P=0.005), and PLT (OR=0.993, 95%CI 0.988-0.998, P=0.004) were associated with advanced fibrosis (P<0.05). Conclusion: Patients with MAFLD-CHB are more likely to develop advanced fibrosis than patients with CHB alone. In the MAFLD-CHB group type 2 diabetes mellitus was associated with advanced fibrosis. It is important to strictly control relevant risk factors in MAFLD-CHB patients, especially in patients with type 2 diabetes.

[Clinical analysis of 86 cases of acute fatty liver of pregnancy]

Objective: To investigate the clinical characteristics and maternal and fetal prognosis of pregnant women with acute fatty liver of pregnancy (AFLP). Methods: The clinical data of 86 AFLP pregnant women admitted to the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from September 2017 to August 2022 were collected, and their general data, clinical characteristics, laboratory tests and maternal and fetal outcomes were retrospectively analyzed. Results: (1) General information: the age of the 86 pregnant women with AFLP was (30.8±5.4) years, and the body mass index was (21.0±2.5) kg/m2. There were 50 primiparas (58.1%, 50/86) and 36 multiparas (41.9%, 36/86). There were 64 singleton pregnancies (74.4%, 64/86) and 22 twin pregnancies (25.6%, 22/86). (2) Clinical characteristics: the main complaints of AFLP pregnant women were gastrointestinal symptoms, including epigastric pain (68.6%, 59/86), nausea (47.7%, 41/86), anorexia (46.5%, 40/86), vomiting (39.5%, 34/86). The main non-gastrointestinal symptoms were jaundice of skin and/or scleral (54.7%, 47/86), edema (38.4%, 33/86), fatigue (19.8%, 17/86), bleeding tendency (16.3%, 14/86), polydipsia or polyuria (14.0%, 12/86), skin itching (8.1%, 7/86), and 17.4% (15/86) AFLP pregnant women had no obvious symptoms. (3) Laboratory tests: the incidence of liver and kidney dysfunction and abnormal coagulation function in AFLP pregnant women was high, and the levels of blood ammonia, lactate dehydrogenase and lactic acid were increased, and the levels of hemoglobin, platelet and albumin decreased. However, only 24 cases (27.9%, 24/86) of AFLP pregnant women showed fatty liver by imageology examination. (4) Pregnancy outcomes: ① AFLP pregnant women had a high incidence of pregnancy complications, mainly including renal insufficiency (95.3%, 82/86), preterm birth (46.5%, 40/86), hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (30.2%, 26/86), gestational diabetes mellitus (36.0%, 31/86), fetal distress (24.4%, 21/86), pulmonary infection (23.3%, 20/86), disseminated intravascular coagulation (16.3%, 14/86), multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (16.3%, 14/86), hepatic encephalopathy (9.3%, 8/86), and intrauterine fetal death (2.3%, 2/86). ② Treatment and outcome of AFLP pregnant women: the intensive care unit transfer rate of AFLP pregnant women was 66.3% (57/86). 82 cases were improved and discharged after treatment, 2 cases were transferred to other hospitals for follow-up treatment, and 2 cases (2.3%, 2/86) died. ③ Neonatal outcomes: except for 2 cases of intrauterine death, a total of 106 neonates were delivered, including 39 cases (36.8%, 39/106) of neonatal asphyxia, 63 cases (59.4%, 63/106) of neonatal intensive care unit admission, and 3 cases (2.8%, 3/106) of neonatal death. Conclusions: AFLP is a severe obstetric complication, which is harmful to mother and fetus. In the process of clinical diagnosis and treatment, attention should be paid to the clinical manifestations and laboratory tests of pregnant women, early diagnosis and active treatment, so as to improve maternal and fetal outcomes.

Diffusion MRI correlation with p16 status and prediction for tumor progression in locally advanced head and neck cancer

Purpose

To investigate p16 effects on diffusion image metrics and associations with tumor progression in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancers.

Methods

Diffusion images pretreatment and after 20 Gy (2wk) of RT were analyzed in patients with cT4/N3 p16+ oropharynx cancer (OPSCC) (N=51) and locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LAHNSCC) (N=28), enrolled onto a prospective adaptive RT trial. Mean ADC values, subvolumes with ADC <1.2 um2/ms (TVLADC), and peak values of low (µL) and high (µH) components of ADC histograms in primary and total nodal gross tumor volumes were analyzed for prediction of freedom from local, distant, or any progression (FFLP, FFDP or FFLRDP) using multivariate Cox proportional-hazards model with clinical factors. P value with false discovery control <0.05 was considered as significant.

Results

With a mean follow up of 36 months, 18 of LAHNSCC patients and 16 of p16+ OPSCC patients had progression. After adjusting for p16, small µL and ADC values, and large TVLADC of primary tumors pre-RT were significantly associated with superior FFLRDP, FFLP and FFDP in the LAHNSCC (p<0.05), but no diffusion metrics were significant in p16+ oropharynx cancers. Post ad hoc analysis of the p16+ OPSCC only showed that large TVLADC of the total nodal burden pre-RT was significantly associated with inferior FFDP (p=0.05).

Conclusion

ADC metrics were associated with different progression patterns in the LAHNSCC and p16+ OPSCC, possibly explained by differences in cancer biology and morphology. A deep understanding of ADC metrics is warranted to establish imaging biomarkers for adaptive RT in HNSCC.

Integrative analysis of transcriptomic and metabolomic profiles reveals enhanced arginine metabolism in androgen-independent prostate cancer cells

BACKGROUND

Prostate cancer is a common solid tumor that affects a significant number of men worldwide. Conventional androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) increases the risk of developing castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Effective clinical management of patients with CRPC is challenging due to the limited understanding.

METHODS

In this study, transcriptomic and metabolomic profiles of androgen-dependent prostate cancer cell line LNCaP and the androgen-independent cells developed from LNCaP cells (LNCaP-ADR) were investigated using RNA-sequencing and LC-MS/MS, respectively. The differentially expressed genes and metabolites were analyzed, and integrative analysis of transcriptomic and metabolomic data was further conducted to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the metabolic characteristics in LNCaP-ADR cells. Quantitative real-time PCR (QPCR) was employed to ascertain the mRNA expression levels of the selected differentially expressed genes.

RESULTS

The arginine and proline metabolism pathway was identified as a commonly altered pathway at both the transcriptional and metabolic levels. In the LNCaP-ADR cells, significant upregulation was observed for metabolites including 5-Aminopentanoic acid, L-Arginine, L-Glutamic acid, N-Acetyl-L-alanine, and Pyrrole-2-carboxylic acid at the metabolic level. At the transcriptional level, MAOA, ALDH3A2, ALDH2, ARG1, CKMT2, and CNDP1 were found to be significantly upregulated in the LNCaP-ADR cells. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) identified various enriched gene sets in the LNCaP-ADR cells, encompassing inflammatory response, 9plus2 motile cilium, motile cilium, ciliary plasm, cilium or flagellum-dependent cell motility, cilium movement, cilium, response to endoplasmic reticulum stress, PTEN DN.V1 DN, SRC UP.V1 UP, IL15 UP.V1 DN, RB DN.V1 DN, AKT UP MTOR DN.V1 UP, VEGF A UP.V1 UP, and KRAS.LUNG.BREAST UP.V1 UP.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings highlight the substantial association between the arginine and proline metabolism pathway and CRPC, emphasizing the need to prioritize strategies that target dysregulated metabolites and differentially expressed genes as essential interventions in the clinical management of CRPC.

[Effect of early tocilizumab intervention on patients with cytokine release syndrome following chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy]

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of early tocilizumab intervention to relieve cytokine release syndrome (CRS) following chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy. Methods: Twenty-two patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia who received tocilizumab to relieve CRS response after CAR-T cell infusion in our research center from October 2015 to July 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the timing of tocilizumab intervention, patients were divided into the conventional and early intervention groups. Patients who received tocilizumab treatment after sustained high fever for 4 h were included in the early intervention group. The clinical data, CRS grade, and event-free survival (EFS) between the two groups were evaluated. Results: Compared with patients who used tocilizumab after severe CRS, no patients in the early intervention group died from CRS, and there was no increased risk of neurotoxicity. Eleven patients (84.62%) achieved complete remission with minimal residual lesions. The median EFS of patients in the early intervention and conventional groups was 2 (95% CI 0-5) and 7 (95% CI 3-11) months, respectively. Conclusion: Early tocilizumab intervention in patients with CRS reduces severe CRS and provides a more optimized therapeutic strategy for CRS caused by CAR-T cell therapy.

Expression of water-soluble nucleocapsid protein of SARS-CoV-2 and analysis of its immunogenicity

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) continues to be a major public health concern. Nucleocapsid (N) protein is the most abundant structural protein on SARS-CoV-2 virions and induces the production of antibodies at the early stage of infection. Large-scale preparation of N protein is essential for the development of immunoassays to detect antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 and the control of virus transmission. In this study, expression of water-soluble N protein was achieved through inducing protein expression at 25°C with 0.5 mM IPTG for 12 h. Western blot and ELISA showed that recombinant N protein could be recognized by sera collected from subjects immunized with Sinovac inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Four monoclonal antibodies namely 2B1B1, 4D3A3, 5G1F8, and 7C6F5 were produced using hybridoma technology. Titers of all four monoclonal antibodies in ELISA reached more than 1.28×10 6.0. Moreover, all monoclonal antibodies could react specifically with N protein expressed by transfection of pcDNA3.1-N into BHK-21 cells in IPMA and IFA. These results indicated that water-soluble N protein retained high immunogenicity and possessed the same epitopes as that of native N protein on virions. In addition, the preparation of water-soluble N protein and its monoclonal antibodies laid the basis for the development of immunoassays for COVID-19 detection.

[Evolution and regional differences in the supportive environment for influenza vaccination among the elderly population in China]

Seasonal influenza leads to a significant disease burden, and older people infected with influenza are susceptible to various complications. Influenza immunization can prevent infection effectively and significantly reduce the risk of complications and severe cases. Creating a supportive environment for vaccination is crucial in advancing the influenza vaccination rate among the elderly population. In China, the present environment for supporting influenza vaccinations among the elderly is primarily comprised of policies for free vaccination and expense reimbursement, which exhibit noteworthy regional variations across cities and regions. This study systematically analyses the supportive environment and regional disparities associated with influenza vaccination among the elderly in China. It aims to comprehend the opportunities for influenza prevention and control resulting from the current background of influenza vaccination and to identify potential health inequality challenges caused by regional differences. The findings should inform the introduction of relevant national policies and programs to protect the health and well-being of the elderly population.

Genomic epidemiological investigation of an outbreak of Serratia marcescens neurosurgical site infections associated with contaminated haircutting toolkits in a hospital barber shop

BACKGROUND

Nine surgical site infections caused by Serratia marcescens were diagnosed in neurosurgical patients in a 3500-bed hospital between 2nd February and 6th April 2022.

OBJECTIVE

To trace the source of infections caused by S. marcescens to expedite termination of the outbreak and prevent future epidemics.

METHODS

A review of all surgical procedures and cultures yielding S. marcescens since February 2022 was conducted. Samples were collected from patients and environmental sources. S. marcescens isolates were characterized by antibiotic susceptibility testing. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was used to investigate genetic relationships. Resistance genes, virulence genes and plasmid replicons were identified.

RESULTS

S. marcescens was isolated from patients' puncture fluid, cerebrospinal fluid and other secretions, and was also cultured from the barbers' haircutting tools, including leather knives, slicker scrapers and razors. In total, 15 isolates were obtained from patients and eight isolates were obtained from haircutting tools. All isolates exhibited identical antibiotic resistance patterns. WGS revealed close clustering among the 23 isolates which differed significantly from previous strains. Three resistance genes and nine virulence-associated genes were detected in all isolates, and 19 of 23 isolates harboured an MOBP-type plasmid. The results confirmed an outbreak of S. marcescens, which was traced to contaminated haircutting tools in the hospital barber shop. The outbreak ended after extensive reinforcement of infection control procedures and re-education of the barbers.

CONCLUSIONS

These results highlight the risk of postoperative infections related to pre-operative skin preparation, and demonstrate the value of next-generation sequencing tools to expedite outbreak investigations.

Curcumin strengthens a spontaneous self-protective mechanism-SP1/PRDX6 pathway, against di-n-butyl phthalate-induced testicular ferroptosis damage

As one of the common plasticizers, di-n-butyl phthalate (DBP) has been using in various daily consumer products worldwide. Since it is easily released from products and exists in the environment for a long time, it has a lasting impact on human health, especially male reproductive health. However, the detailed mechanism of testicular damage from DBP and the protection strategy are still not clear enough. In this study, we found that DBP could induce dose-dependent ferroptosis in testicular tissue. Mechanism dissection indicates that DBP can upregulate SP1 expression, which could directly transcriptionally upregulate PRDX6, a negative regulator of ferroptosis. Overexpression of PRDX6 or adding SP1 agonist curcumin could suppress the DBP-induced ferroptosis on testicular cells. In vivo, rats were given 500 mg/kg/day DBP orally for 3 weeks; elevated levels of ferroptosis were detected in testicular tissue. When the above-mentioned doses of DBP and curcumin at a dose of 300 mg/kg/day were administered intragastrically simultaneously, the testicular ferroptosis induced by DBP was alleviated. Immunohistochemistry and quantitative real-time PCR of testis tissue showed that the expression of PRDX6 was upregulated under the action of DBP and curcumin. These findings suggest a spontaneous self-protection mechanism of testicular tissue from DBP damage by upregulating SP1 and PRDX6. However, it is not strong enough to resist the DBP-induced ferroptosis. Curcumin can strengthen this self-protection mechanism and weaken the level of ferroptosis induced by DBP. This study may help us to develop a novel therapeutic option with curcumin to protect the testicular tissue from ferroptosis and function impairment by DBP.

Marine oil spill photodegradation: Laboratory simulation, affecting factors analysis and kinetic model development

Photodegradation significantly influences marine oil spill behavior, yet its role remains underrepresented in current models, impairing predictive accuracy. Addressing this, our study rigorously examined oil properties and environmental determinants affecting marine oil spill photodegradation through laboratory simulations. We identified and quantified key factors and their interactions, noting particularly the positive influence of asphaltene and negative implications of oil density. We also discerned a negative correlation between n-alkane degradation and carbon numbers. Our findings underscored the pivotal roles of temperature and irradiance in photodegradation. All tested oils adhered to first-order kinetics, with rate constants ranging from 0.0348 to 0.0645 day-1. Finally, we introduced a novel model incorporating temperature, irradiance and their interactions, ensuring reasonable simulations for marine oil spill photodegradation, fortifying marine oil spill management strategies.

[Establishment of a nomogram prediction model using common preoperative indicators for early weight loss after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy]

Objectives: To construct a nomogram prediction model using common preoperative indicators for early weight loss (EWL) 1 year after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Methods: Relevant data of obese patients who had undergone LSG from January 2015 to May 2022 in Fujian Medical University Union Hospital and Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated Fujian Medical University were analyzed. Patients with a history of major abdominal surgery, severe gastroesophageal reflux disease, pregnancy within 1 year after surgery, or who were lost to follow-up were excluded, resulting in a total of 200 patients in the study (190 from Fujian Medical University Union Hospital and 10 from Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated Fujian Medical University). The participants were 51 men and 149 women of a mean age 29.9±8.2 years and a body mass index (BMI) 38.7±6.5 kg/m2. All patients in this group underwent standardized LSG procedure. Achieving ideal weight (BMI≤25 kg/m2) 1 year after LSG was defined as goal of EWL. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors that independently influenced EWL. These factors were incorporated into the nomogram model. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (the larger the area under the curve [AUC], the better the predictive ability and accuracy of the model), likelihood ratio test (higher likelihood ratio indicates greater model homogeneity), decision curve analysis (higher net benefit indicates a better model), Akaike information criterion (AIC; smaller AIC indicates a better model), and Bayesian information criterion (BIC; smaller BIC indicates a better model) were used to validate the predictive ability of the column line diagram model. Results: In this study of 200 obese patients who underwent LSG surgery, 136 achieved EWL goal, whereas the remaining 64 did not. The rate of EWL goal achievement of the entire group was 68.0%. Compared with patients who did not achieve EWL goal, those who did had lower BMI, alanine transaminase, aspartate transaminase, triglycerides, and higher cholesterol. Additionally, the proportion of female was higher and the proportions of patients with fatty liver and hypertension lower in those who achieved EWL goal (all P<0.05). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that preoperative BMI (OR=0.852, 95%CI: 0.796-0.912, P<0.001), alanine transaminase (OR=0.992, 95%CI: 0.985-0.999, P=0.024), presence of fatty liver (OR=0.185, 95%CI: 0.038-0.887, P=0.035) and hypertension (OR=0.374, 95%CI: 0.144-0.969, P=0.043) were independently associated with failure to achieve EWL goal. Cholesterol (OR=1.428, 95%CI: 1.052-1.939, P=0.022) was independently associated with achieving EWL goal. We used the above variables to establish an EWL nomogram model. ROC analysis, the likelihood ratio test, decision curve analysis, and AIC all revealed that the predictive value of the model was better than that of BMI alone (nomogram model vs. BMI: area under the curve 0.840 vs. 0.798, P=0.047; likelihood ratio: 58.785 vs. 36.565, AIC: 193.066 vs. 207.063, BIC: 212.856 vs. 213.660). Conclusion: Our predictive model is more accurate in predicting EWL after LSG compared with using BMI.

A Photoelectrochemical Sensor Based on DNA Bio-Dots-Induced Aggregation of AuNPs for Methionine Detection

Based on DNA bio-dots-induced aggregation of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs), a methionine (Met) photoelectrochemical (PEC) sensor with CS-GSH-CuNCs/TiO2 NPs as the photoelectric conversion element and AuNPs as the specific recognition element was constructed. First, a TiO2 NPs/ITO electrode and CS-GSH-CuNCs were prepared, and then the CS-GSH-CuNCs/TiO2 NPs/ITO photosensitive electrode was obtained by self-assembly. Next, DNA bio-dots were modified to the upper surface of the electrode using a coupling reaction to assemble the DNA bio-dots/CS-GSH-CuNCs/TiO2 NPs electrode. Amino-rich DNA bio-dots were used to induce the aggregation of AuNPs on the electrode surface via Au-N interactions and prepare the AuNPs/DNA bio-dots/CS-GSH-CuNCs/TiO2 NPs electrode. Due to the fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) between CS-GSH-CuNCs and AuNPs, the complexation chance of electron-hole (e--h+) pair in CS-GSH-CuNCs increased, which, in turn, led to a decrease in photocurrent intensity. When Met was present, AuNPs aggregated on the electrode surface were shed and bound to Met since the Au-S interaction is stronger than the Au-N interaction, resulting in the recovery of the photocurrent signal. Under optimal conditions, the photocurrent intensity of the PEC sensor showed good linearity with the logarithm of Met concentration in the range of 25.0 nmol/L-10.0 μmol/L with the limit of detection (LOD) of 5.1 nmol/L (S/N = 3, n = 10).

[Interaction analysis of the influence of different factors and benzene exposure on workers' alanine aminotransferase]

Objective: To investigate the main factors that influence ALT abnormalities in workers exposed to benzene. Methods: In June 2022, data of 613 enterprises with benzene hazards and 585 enterprises with non-benzene hazards in Tianjin in 2021 were collected, and occupational health examination data of 13018 workers with benzene exposure and 13018 workers with non-benzene exposure were collected, and the region, enterprise type, industry classification and enterprise scale of the employer were analyzed. And occupational health examination data of workers with benzene exposure and non-benzene exposure. The effects of personal general situation, occupational history, enterprise information and benzene exposure on alanine aminotransferase were evaluated by additive interaction. Results: Compared with the group of non-benzene-exposed workers, the personal general conditions, occupational history, company information were higher in the benzene-exposed workers, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The quantitative analysis of additive interaction found that gender (RERI=2.632, 95%CI: 1.966-3.297; AP=0.383, 95%CI: 0.311-0.456; S=1.813, 95%CI: 1.530-2.149), age (RERI=1.142, 95%CI: 0.928-1.356; AP=0.462, 95% CI: 0.371-0.552; S=4.461, 95%CI: 1.800-11.053), length of service (RERI=-1.199, 95%CI: -1.653--0.745; AP=-0.456, 95%CI: -0.640--0.271; S=0.576, 95%CI: 0.479-0.693), region (RERI=0.421, 95% CI: 0.148-0.694; AP=0.161, 95%CI: 0.053-0.268; S=1.350, 95%CI: 1.057-1.726), industry classification (RERI=0.627, 95%CI: 0.345-0.910; AP=0.232, 95%CI: 0.132-0.332; S=1.584, 95%CI: 1.233-2.035) and benzene exposure had a statistically significant additive interaction with abnormal serum ALT. Conclusion: Emphasis should be placed on male workers under the age of 40 in the petrochemical industry, oil storage and transportation, and power production, so as to protect the health of workers more specifically and reduce the risk of disability due to disease.

Gasdermin D: A Potential New Auxiliary Pan-Biomarker for the Detection and Diagnosis of Diseases

Pyroptosis is a form of programmed cell death mediated by gasdermins, particularly gasdermin D (GSDMD), which is widely expressed in tissues throughout the body. GSDMD belongs to the gasdermin family, which is expressed in a variety of cell types including epithelial cells and immune cells. It is involved in the regulation of anti-inflammatory responses, leading to its differential expression in a wide range of diseases. In this review, we provide an overview of the current understanding of the major activation mechanisms and effector pathways of GSDMD. Subsequently, we examine the importance and role of GSDMD in different diseases, highlighting its potential as a pan-biomarker. We specifically focus on the biological characteristics of GSDMD in several diseases and its promising role in diagnosis, early detection, and differential diagnosis. Furthermore, we discuss the application of GSDMD in predicting prognosis and monitoring treatment efficacy in cancer. This review proposes a new strategy to guide therapeutic decision-making and suggests potential directions for further research into GSDMD.

Observation of New Baryons in the Ξ_{b}^{-}π^{+}π^{-} and Ξ_{b}^{0}π^{+}π^{-} Systems

The first observation and study of two new baryonic structures in the final state Ξ_{b}^{0}π^{+}π^{-} and the confirmation of the Ξ_{b}(6100)^{-} state in the Ξ_{b}^{-}π^{+}π^{-} decay mode are reported using proton-proton collision data collected by the LHCb experiment, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 9  fb^{-1}. In addition, the properties of the known Ξ_{b}^{*0}, Ξ_{b}^{'-} and Ξ_{b}^{*-} resonances are measured with improved precision. The new decay mode of the Ξ_{b}^{0} baryon to the Ξ_{c}^{+} π^{-} π^{+} π^{-} final state is observed and exploited for the first time in these measurements.

Precision Measurement of CP Violation in the Penguin-Mediated Decay B_{s}^{0}→ϕϕ

A flavor-tagged time-dependent angular analysis of the decay B_{s}^{0}→ϕϕ is performed using pp collision data collected by the LHCb experiment at the center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 6  fb^{-1}. The CP-violating phase and direct CP-violation parameter are measured to be ϕ_{s}^{ss[over ¯]s}=-0.042±0.075±0.009  rad and |λ|=1.004±0.030±0.009, respectively, assuming the same values for all polarization states of the ϕϕ system. In these results, the first uncertainties are statistical and the second systematic. These parameters are also determined separately for each polarization state, showing no evidence for polarization dependence. The results are combined with previous LHCb measurements using pp collisions at center-of-mass energies of 7 and 8 TeV, yielding ϕ_{s}^{ss[over ¯]s}=-0.074±0.069  rad and |λ|=1.009±0.030. This is the most precise study of time-dependent CP violation in a penguin-dominated B meson decay. The results are consistent with CP symmetry and with the standard model predictions.

Transcriptomic and phenotype analysis revealed the role of rpoS in stress resistance and virulence of a novel ST3355 ESBL-producing hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae isolate

Introduction

An extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae (HvKP) strain HKE9 was isolated from the blood in an outpatient.

Methods

The effect of the global regulatory factor RpoS on antimicrobial resistance, pathogenicity, and environmental adaptability was elucidated.

Results

HKE9 is a novel ST3355 (K20/O2a) hypervirulent strain with a positive string test and resistant to cephems except cefotetan. It has a genome size of 5.6M, including two plasmids. CTX-M-15 was found in plasmid 2, and only ompk37 was found in the chromosome. HKE9 could produce bacterial siderophores, and genes of enterobactin, yersiniabactin, aerobactin, and salmochelin have been retrieved in the genome. As a global regulatory factor, knockout of rpoS did not change antimicrobial resistance or hemolytic phenotype while increasing the virulence to Galleria mellonella larvae and showing higher viscosity. Moreover, rpoS knockout can increase bacterial competitiveness and cell adhesion ability. Interestingly, HKE9-M-rpoS decreased resistance to acidic pH, high osmotic pressure, heat shock, and ultraviolet and became sensitive to disinfectants (H2O2, alcohol, and sodium hypochlorite). Although there were 13 Type 6 secretion system (T6SS) core genes divided into two segments with tle1 between segments in the chromosome, transcriptomic analysis showed that rpoS negatively regulated T4SS located on plasmid 2, type 1, and type 3 fimbriae and positively regulate genes responsible for acidic response, hyperosmotic pressure, heat shock, oxidative stress, alcohol and hypochlorous acid metabolism, and quorum sensing.

Discussion

Here, this novel ST3355 ESBL-HvKP strain HKE9 may spread via various clonal types. The important regulation effect of rpoS is the enhanced tolerance and resistance to environmental stress and disinfectants, which may be at the cost of reducing virulence and regulated by T4SS.

Combined deep-learning MRI-based radiomic models for preoperative risk classification of endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma

Background

Differences exist between high- and low-risk endometrial cancer (EC) in terms of whether lymph node dissection is performed. Factors such as tumor grade, myometrial invasion (MDI), and lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) in the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) guidelines risk classification can often only be accurately assessed postoperatively. The aim of our study was to estimate the risk classification of patients with endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma before surgery and offer individualized treatment plans based on their risk classification.

Methods

Clinical information and last preoperative pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of patients with postoperative pathologically determined endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma were collected retrospectively. The region of interest (ROI) was subsequently plotted in T1-weighted imaging (T1WI), T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) MRI scans, and the traditional radiomics features and deep-learning image features were extracted. A final radiomics nomogram model integrating traditional radiomics features, deep learning image features, and clinical information was constructed to distinguish between low- and high-risk patients (based on the 2020 ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO guidelines). The efficacy of the model was evaluated in the training and validation sets of the model.

Results

We finally included 168 patients from January 1, 2020 to July 29, 2021, of which 95 patients in 2021 were classified as the training set and 73 patients in 2020 were classified as the validation set. In the training set, the area under the curve (AUC) of the radiomics nomogram was 0.923 (95%CI: 0.865-0.980) and in the validation set, the AUC of the radiomics nomogram was 0.842 (95%CI: 0.762-0.923). The nomogram had better predictions than both the traditional radiomics model and the deep-learning radiomics model.

Conclusion

MRI-based radiomics models can be useful for preoperative risk classification of patients with endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma.

[Efficacy and safety analysis of the zanubrutinib-based bridging regimen in chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma]

Objective: To further elucidate the clinical efficacy and safety of a combination regimen based on the BTK inhibitor zebutanil bridging CD19 Chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T cells) in the treatment of relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (r/r DLBCL) . Methods: Twenty-one patients with high-risk r/r DLBCL were treated with a zanubrutinib-based regimen bridging CAR-T between June 2020 and June 2023 at the Department of Hematology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji University and the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, and the efficacy and safety were retrospectively analyzed. Results: All 21 patients were enrolled, and the median age was 57 years (range: 38-76). Fourteen patients (66.7%) had an eastern cooperative oncology group performance status score (ECOG score) of ≥2. Eighteen patients (85.7%) had an international prognostic index (IPI) score of ≥3. Three patients (14.3%) had an IPI score of 2 but had extranodal infiltration. Fourteen patients (66.7%) had double-expression of DLBCL and seven (33.3%) had TP53 mutations. With a median follow-up of 24.8 (95% CI 17.0-31.6) months, the objective response rate was 81.0%, and 11 patients (52.4%) achieved complete remission. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.8 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was not reached. The 1-year PFS rate was 52.4% (95% CI 29.8% -74.3%), and the 1-year OS rate was 80.1% (95% CI 58.1% -94.6%). Moreover, 18 patients (85.7%) had grade 1-2 cytokine-release syndrome, and two patients (9.5%) had grade 1 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome. Conclusion: Zanubrutinib-based combination bridging regimen of CAR-T therapy for r/r DLBCL has high efficacy and demonstrated a good safety profile.

Measurement of the Λ_{b}^{0}→Λ(1520)μ^{+}μ^{-} Differential Branching Fraction

The branching fraction of the rare decay Λ_{b}^{0}→Λ(1520)μ^{+}μ^{-} is measured for the first time, in the squared dimuon mass intervals q^{2}, excluding the J/ψ and ψ(2S) regions. The data sample analyzed was collected by the LHCb experiment at center-of-mass energies of 7, 8, and 13 TeV, corresponding to a total integrated luminosity of 9  fb^{-1}. The result in the highest q^{2} interval, q^{2}>15.0  GeV^{2}/c^{4}, where theoretical predictions have the smallest model dependence, agrees with the predictions.

Exploring the Clinical Characteristics and Survival of Early-Onset and Late-Onset Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Presently, early-onset and late-onset nasopharyngeal cancer (EONPC and LONPC, defined as age ≤ 50 years and > 50 years old, respectively) are seldom studied. The purpose of this study is to determine the clinical and survival characteristics between the NPC patients of these two age groups.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Patients diagnosed with NPC in The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2000 to 2018 years, and in our institution from 2014 to 2017 years were reviewed in this study. Clinicopathological characteristics, treatment modalities, and survival outcomes of EONPC and LONPC patients were analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

A total of 2943 patients (including 935 patients with EONPC and 2008 patients with LONPC) in the SEER database and 833 domestic patients (including 518 patients with EONPC and 315 patients with LONPC) in our center were finally enrolled. In the SEER database, both EONPC and LONPC patients displayed a greater prevalence in men. EONPC patients presented with a worse staging of regional lymph node metastasis (p < 0.001), but had a better prognosis than that in the LONPC patients (p < 0.001). More EONPC patients received chemotherapy and radiation (p < 0.001). Similar results were validated in our center, and in addition, it was found that EONPC patients had an advanced clinical stage (stage III, IVA, 92.1% vs. 85.1%, p = 0.016) and larger primary tumor volume (41.7% vs. 35.7%, p = 0.049). Meanwhile, EONPC patients had a superior overall survival (OS) (p = 0.017) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (p = 0.004) compared to that in the LONPC patients. In univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis, early-onset was independently associated with a higher 5-year OS (82.4% vs. 73.3%, p = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

EONPC patients present with more advanced lymph node metastasis stage and clinical stage, but have a better survival compared to LONPC patients. Age ≤ 50 years was an independent prognostic factor for survival outcome in NPC patients. To achieved the better individualization of the therapeutic regimen, there is the need for further studies on EONPC.

The Prognostic Impact of Substantial Lymphovascular Space Invasion in Women with FIGO Stage I Uterine Endometrioid Carcinoma with Pathologically Negative Nodal Evaluation

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Substantiallymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) is an important predictor of lymph node involvement in women with endometrial carcinoma. However, its prognostic significance in women with stage I who had pathologic negative nodal evaluation (PNNE) was not fully evaluated. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of substantial LVSI on recurrence-free (RFS), disease-specific (DSS) and overall survival (OS) in women with FIGO stage I uterine endometrioid adenocarcinoma (EC).

MATERIALS/METHODS

Our uterine cancer database was queried for women with stage I EC who had a hysterectomy and PNNE at our institution between 1/1990 and 11/2022. Postoperatively, patients were managed with observation or adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) with pelvic external beam RT or vaginal cuff brachytherapy (VB). Women with synchronous malignancies and those who received adjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. Pathologic specimens were retrieved and LVSI was quantified by Gynecology pathologists (none, focal or substantial). Patients' demographics, surgical and pathologic variables were analyzed. Predictors of RFS, DSS and OS using univariate (UVA) and multivariate analysis (MVA) were studied.

RESULTS

One thousand fifty-two patients were identified with a median age of 63 years and median follow-up of 9.7 years. Median number of examined lymph node (LN) were 9 (range 4-18). 907 patients (86.2%) had no LVSI, 87 (8.3%) had focal and 58 (5.5%) had substantial LVSI. In patients with focal LVSI, 32.2% received pelvic RT and 39.1% received VB. In patients with substantial LVSI, 20.7% received pelvic RT and 58.6% received VB.Recurrence was diagnosed in 86 patients (8.2%). While any LVSI was associated with tumor recurrence, there was no significant difference for the site of initial recurrence between patients with focal vs. substantial LVSI. 5-year RFS was 93.3% (95% CI 91.5-95.1), 76.8% (67.2-87.7) and 79.1% (67.6-95.3) for no, focal and substantial LVSI. The 5-year DSS was 97.6% (96.5-98.7), 83.5% (75-93.1), and 90% (81.8-99.9); and 5-year OS was 90.7% (88.7-92.8), 72.8% (62.9-84.2) and 86% (76.2-97.2), respectively. Independent predictors of worse 5-year RFS and DSS include any LVSI, age > 60 years, higher tumor grade. Independent predictors of worse 5- year OS include any LVSI, age > 60, high comorbidity burden, and higher tumor grade.

CONCLUSION

Our large data suggest similar recurrence-free, disease specific and OS for women with stage I uterine endometrioid carcinoma who had pathologically negative nodal evaluation and substantial or focal LVSI. There was no significant difference for the site of initial recurrence between patients with focal or substantial LVSI. Multi-institutional pooled analyses may be needed to validate our results.

HDAC3 improves intestinal function of mice by regulating cGAS-Sting pathway of intestinal glial cells

It is found that HDAC3 may be a potential therapeutic target for intestinal related diseases. At present, the role and mechanism of HDAC3 in the pathogenesis of severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) have not been reported, which needs to be further explored. The SAP mouse model was established and the expression of HDAC3 was detected by immunohistochemistry. H&E staining showed the intestinal pathological state of SAP mice. The expression of HDAC3 was measured by real-time quantitative PCR (RT qPCR) and Western blot. Apoptosis kit was used to determine cell apoptosis rate. The level of inflammatory factors was detected by ELISA kits. The expressions of HDAC3, cGAS and Sting were significantly increased in SAP patients and SAP mice. Silencing HDAC3 promoted the proliferation and adhesion of intestinal glial cells and inhibited the inflammation and apoptosis of intestinal epithelial cells. In addition, silencing HDAC3 inhibited oxidative stress in intestinal epithelial cells. Furthermore, silencing HDAC3 inhibited the activation of cGAS-Sting pathway in intestinal glial cells. More importantly, silencing HDAC3 alleviates intestinal barrier function in SAP mice. HDAC3 inhibition improves acute pancreatitis in mice by regulating cGAS-Sting pathway of intestinal glial cells.

Loss of ZBED6 Protects Against Sepsis-Induced Muscle Atrophy by Upregulating DOCK3-Mediated RAC1/PI3K/AKT Signaling Pathway in Pigs

Sepsis-induced muscle atrophy often increases morbidity and mortality in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, yet neither therapeutic target nor optimal animal model is available for this disease. Here, by modifying the surgical strategy of cecal ligation and puncture (CLP), a novel sepsis pig model is created that for the first time recapitulates the whole course of sepsis in humans. With this model and sepsis patients, increased levels of the transcription factor zinc finger BED-type containing 6 (ZBED6) in skeletal muscle are shown. Protection against sepsis-induced muscle wasting in ZBED6-deficient pigs is further demonstrated. Mechanistically, integrated analysis of RNA-seq and ChIP-seq reveals dedicator of cytokinesis 3 (DOCK3) as the direct target of ZBED6. In septic ZBED6-deficient pigs, DOCK3 expression is increased in skeletal muscle and myocytes, activating the RAC1/PI3K/AKT pathway and protecting against sepsis-induced muscle wasting. Conversely, opposite gene expression patterns and exacerbated muscle wasting are observed in septic ZBED6-overexpressing myotubes. Notably, sepsis patients show increased ZBED6 expression along with reduced DOCK3 and downregulated RAC1/PI3K/AKT pathway. These findings suggest that ZBED6 is a potential therapeutic target for sepsis-induced muscle atrophy, and the established sepsis pig model is a valuable tool for understanding sepsis pathogenesis and developing its therapeutics.

Disease Characteristics, Treatment and Survival for Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Elderly

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Incidence of oropharyngeal cancers (OP) has been increasing over the past few decades, mainly driven by human papilloma virus (HPV) associated cancers in younger men. However, a large number of OP patients in recent years are ≥65 years of age. We wanted to determine if there is a difference in outcomes in elderly patients with OP as compared to younger patients.

MATERIALS/METHODS

We queried our institutional prospectively maintained head and neck cancer database for patients with non-metastatic OP treated between 1/2009-6/2020. We excluded patients who did not receive any definitive treatment. We analyzed clinicopathological and treatment characteristics for elderly (age at diagnosis ≥65 years) compared to young (<65 years) across HPV subtypes. We also studied survival endpoints among age groups using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test. Independent predictors were estimated using multivariate (MVA) Cox regression models for each HPV subtype.

RESULTS

We identified 340 patients who met our inclusion criteria: elderly 123 (36%) and young 213 (64%). The proportion of elderly HPV+ve patients showed an increasing trend over the years studied. Median age was 70 years (range 65-91) in elderly and 56 years (38-64) in young (p<0.001); and HPV+ve/-ve were 73.2/26.8% vs 74.6/25.3% for both age groups respectively (p = 0.86). Elderly patients had higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and included more divorcees (p<0.05). There were more elderly current/former smokers (97% vs 82%; p = 0.007) within HPV-ve cases. Definitive radiotherapy (RT) +/- systemic therapy (CRT) was utilized in 73.2% (n = 249), while the remainder had surgery +/- adjuvant RT/CRT. There was no difference with age for OP subsite, 8th edition AJCC stage and treatment received except for more use of cetuximab (22.5% vs 10.2%; p<0.001) and weekly cisplatin (32.4% vs 25.8%; p<0.001) among elderly patients. After a median follow up of 5.24 years (IQR: 3.53), 3-year overall (OS) (HPV+ve: 85 vs 81%; HPV-ve: 39 vs 52%), locoregional free (LRFS) (HPV+ve: 86 vs 90%; HPV-ve: 67 vs 69%) and distant metastasis free (DMFS) survival (HPV+ve: 91 vs 90%; HPV-ve: 79 vs 81%) were all non-significant for elderly vs young respectively. On MVA, CCI and AJCC stage for HPV+ve; and smoking, T-stage and lymphovascular space invasion for HPV- were associated with OS. For HPV+ve, AJCC stage, adjuvant vs definitive RT and treatment in later years were predictive of better LRFS, whereas smoking index and extracapsular space invasion were deterministic for DMFS. Interestingly, outcomes among those who received cetuximab was similar to those who received concurrent cisplatin for all endpoints.

CONCLUSION

We did not note any significant difference in outcomes among elderly patients treated for OP when compared to the younger patients when multi-disciplinary head and neck cancer care is provided. This was noted even though a significantly larger proportion of elderly patients received cetuximab concurrent with RT as opposed to standard of care cisplatin.

Chronic intranasal corticosteroid treatment induces degeneration of olfactory sensory neurons in normal and allergic rhinitis mice

BACKGROUND

Nasal eosinophilic inflammation is the therapeutic target for olfactory dysfunction in allergic rhinitis (AR). Intranasal corticosteroids are commonly considered to offer targetable benefit given their immunosuppressive property. However, experimental evidence suggests that continuous corticosteroid exposure may directly cause olfactory damage by disrupting the turnover of olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs). This potentially deleterious effect of corticosteroids calls into question their long-term topical use for treating olfactory loss related to AR. The aim of this study was to assess the impacts of chronic intranasal corticosteroid treatment on olfactory function and OSN population in mice under normal and pathological conditions.

METHODS

BALB/c mice were intranasally treated with fluticasone propionate (FP, 0.3 mg/kg) for up to 8 weeks. Additional mice were used to establish an ovalbumin-induced mouse model of AR, followed by nasal challenge with ovalbumin for 8 weeks in the presence or absence of intranasal FP treatment. The authors examined olfactory function, OSN existence, neuronal turnover, and nasal inflammation using behavioral test, histological analyses, Western blotting, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

Intranasal treatment with FP for 8 weeks (FP-wk8) reduced odor sensitivity in normal mice. This reduction was concomitant with loss of OSNs and the axons projecting to the olfactory bulb, primarily resulting from increased neuronal apoptosis. In FP-wk8 AR mice, intranasal FP treatment attenuated olfactory impairment and eosinophilic inflammation but failed to reconstitute OSN population and axonal projections.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that chronic intranasal corticosteroid treatment contributes to OSN degeneration that may reduce the therapeutic effectiveness for AR-related olfactory loss.

The Feasibility of Level Ib Sparing Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients with High-Risk Factors: Based on International Guideline

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

In spite of the rarity of level Ib recurrence after intensity-modulated radiation therapy, the International Guideline (IG) provides the risk factors for prophylactic coverage. In practice, however, there are significant differences between institutions. The purpose of this study is to examine the feasibility of sparing level Ib IMRT in NPC patients with high-risk factors based on IG.

MATERIALS/METHODS

From January 2014 to October 2017, newly-diagnostic, non-metastatic NPC patients in our center were retrospectively reviewed. According to the risk factors of prophylactic level Ib coverage in patients with negative level Ib recommended by IG, the characteristics of pre-treatment MRI were analyzed. Four high-risk factors were identified: a. involvement of the structures that drain to level Ib as first echelon (FES), including anterior half of nasal cavity, oral cavity, b. involvement of submandibular gland (SMG), c. with radiologic extranodal extension (rENE) in level II LNs, or d. maximal axial diameter (MAD)≧2 cm in level II LNs. Patients with risk factors were divided into Cohort A (with risk factors a), Cohort B (with risk factor b, but without a), and Cohort C (only with risk factors c and/or d). Recurrence rates of level Ib and regional relapse-free survival (RRFS) rates were evaluated in different cohorts.

RESULTS

A total of 961 patients were finally included. Thirty-six cases (3.7%) presented with radiologically positive level Ib metastasis. For the other patients with negative Ib LNs, there were 18, 65, 421, and 444 cases classified as FES involvement, SMG involvement, level II LNs with rENE, and level II nodal with MAD ≧2 cm. Excluding overlap, a total of 571 patients with risk factors were divided into three groups: Cohort A (n = 18), Cohort B (n = 49) and Cohort C (n = 504). Nine patients (9/961, 0.94%) developed level Ib recurrence. Except for 1 patient with positive Ib LNs at diagnosis, 2 did not meet any of the risk factors, while the other six (6/9, 66.7%) met at least one risk factor. The rate of recurrence at neck level Ib was highest in Cohort A (11.1%, 2/18; Ib-sparing group: 0/10, 0.0% vs Ib-covering group: 2/8, 25.0%; P = 0.183). In Cohort B, no cases were found with level Ib recurrence (0.0%, 0/49). In Cohort C, the rates were rare (0.8%, 4/504) in both groups (0.7%, 2/276 vs 0.9%, 2/228; P > 0.999). Among the three Cohorts, there were no significant differences in 5-year RRFS between two groups, which were 90.0% vs 62.5% (p = 0.248), 90.9% vs 92.0% (p = 0.905), and 92.6% vs 90.1% (p = 0.445), respectively. Among patients with high-risk factors, the incidence of grade 3-4 late dry mouth symptom was higher in the level Ib-covering group (3.1% vs 7.5%, P = 0.033).

CONCLUSION

Level Ib sparing appears safe and feasible for NPC patients with negative level Ib LNs, even if combined with risk factors: SMG involvement, and/or level II with rENE, and/or level II MAD ≧2 cm. Level Ib-sparing irradiation reduces dry mouth symptoms compared with level Ib-irradiation.

Observation of New Ω_{c}^{0} States Decaying to the Ξ_{c}^{+}K^{-} Final State

Two new excited states, Ω_{c}(3185)^{0} and Ω_{c}(3327)^{0}, are observed in the Ξ_{c}^{+}K^{-} invariant-mass spectrum using proton-proton collision data collected by the LHCb experiment, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 9  fb^{-1}. Five previously observed excited Ω_{c}^{0} states are confirmed, namely Ω_{c}(3000)^{0}, Ω_{c}(3050)^{0}, Ω_{c}(3065)^{0}, Ω_{c}(3090)^{0}, and Ω_{c}(3119)^{0}. The masses and widths of these seven states are measured with the highest precision to date.

Evidence of a J/ψK_{S}^{0} Structure in B^{0}→J/ψϕK_{S}^{0} Decays

An amplitude analysis of B^{0}→J/ψϕK_{S}^{0} decays is performed using proton-proton collision data, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 9  fb^{-1}, collected with the LHCb detector at center-of-mass energies of 7, 8, and 13 TeV. Evidence with a significance of 4.0 standard deviations of a structure in the J/ψK_{S}^{0} system, named T_{ψs1}^{θ}(4000)^{0}, is seen, with its mass and width measured to be 3991_{-10}^{+12} _{-17}^{+9}  MeV/c^{2} and 105_{-25}^{+29} _{-23}^{+17}  MeV, respectively, where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second systematic. The T_{ψs1}^{θ}(4000)^{0} state is likely to be the isospin partner of the T_{ψs1}^{θ}(4000)^{+} state, previously observed in the J/ψK^{+} system of the B^{+}→J/ψϕK^{+} decay. When isospin symmetry for the charged and neutral T_{ψs1}^{θ}(4000) states is assumed, the signal significance increases to 5.4 standard deviations.

The Impact of ESBLs-Positive Escherichia coli's Resistance to Cefepime and Its Guidance for Clinical Treatment

Background

Escherichia coli (E. coli) is a common pathogen in bloodstream infections (BSI), and the production of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) is its main mechanism of resistance. However, the impact of different ESBL genotypes of E. coli on the resistance to Cefepime (FEP) remains unclear.

Methods

A total of 2356 cases of BSI patients were collected. The experimental group included 188 ESBL-positive E. coli strains that were resistant to FEP but sensitive to ceftazidime (CAZ). Antibiotic usage and resistance rates were evaluated through antimicrobial susceptibility testing and antibiotic usage records. The ESBL genotypes were identified, and the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and mutant prevention concentration (MPC) of FEP were determined.

Results

In ESBL-positive E. coli, three ESBL genotypes were identified: 188 strains of CTX-M, 130 strains of TEM-1, and 26 strains of OXA-10. Among them, 124 strains carried both CTX-M-9 and TEM-1 genotypes, 22 strains carried two CTX-M genotypes (CTX-M-1 and CTX-M-2), 20 strains carried both CTX-M-9 and OXA-10, and 6 strains carried three genotypes (CTX-M-9, CTX-TEM-1, and OXA-10). The MIC50, MIC90, MPC50, and MPC90 of the 188 ESBL-positive E. coli were 64, 256, 128, and 528, respectively. The MIC values ranged from 32 to 256, while the MPC values ranged from 64 to 528. The MIC50, MIC90, MPC50, and MPC90 of the 40 ESBL-negative E. coli were 0.5, 1, 64, and 128, respectively; the MIC values ranged from 0.25 to 4, while the MPC values ranged from 32 to 256, respectively.

Conclusion

ESBL-positive E. coli induces an increase in the MIC value of FEP, leading to an increase in FEP resistance. The inoculation effect also causes a significant increase in the MPC value of FEP, especially the increase in selection index value, indicating selective enrichment and amplification of drug-resistant mutants, resulting in clinical treatment failure.