Sustained antimicrobial activity of tigecycline against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from United States Medical Centers from 2004 through 2008

The global prevalence of Daptomycin, Tigecycline, Quinupristin/Dalfopristin, and Linezolid-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci strains: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (MRCoNS) are among the main causes of nosocomial infections, which have caused major problems in recent years due to continuously increasing spread of various antibiotic resistance features. Apparently, vancomycin is still an effective antibiotic for treatment of infections caused by these bacteria but in recent years, additional resistance phenotypes have led to the accelerated introduction of newer agents such as linezolid, tigecycline, daptomycin, and quinupristin/dalfopristin (Q/D). Due to limited data availability on the global rate of resistance to these antibiotics, in the present study, the resistance rates of S. aureus, Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), and CoNS to these antibiotics were collected.

Method

Several databases including web of science, EMBASE, and Medline (via PubMed), were searched (September 2018) to identify those studies that address MRSA, and CONS resistance to linezolid, tigecycline, daptomycin, and Q/D around the world.

Result

Most studies that reported resistant staphylococci were from the United States, Canada, and the European continent, while African and Asian countries reported the least resistance to these antibiotics. Our results showed that linezolid had the best inhibitory effect on S. aureus. Although resistances to this antibiotic have been reported from different countries, however, due to the high volume of the samples and the low number of resistance, in terms of statistical analyzes, the resistance to this antibiotic is zero. Moreover, linezolid, daptomycin and tigecycline effectively (99.9%) inhibit MRSA. Studies have shown that CoNS with 0.3% show the lowest resistance to linezolid and daptomycin, while analyzes introduced tigecycline with 1.6% resistance as the least effective antibiotic for these bacteria. Finally, MRSA and CoNS had a greater resistance to Q/D with 0.7 and 0.6%, respectively and due to its significant side effects and drug-drug interactions; it appears that its use is subject to limitations.

Conclusion

The present study shows that resistance to new agents is low in staphylococci and these antibiotics can still be used for treatment of staphylococcal infections in the world.

The In Vitro Evaluation of Tigecycline and the In Vivo Evaluation of RPX-978 (0.5% Tigecycline) as an Ocular Antibiotic

PURPOSE

The goals of the current study were to determine the in vitro antibacterial activity of tigecycline against multiple clinically relevant ocular pathogens and to evaluate the in vivo ocular tolerability and efficacy of 0.5% tigecycline in a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) keratitis model.

METHODS

In vitro: Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined for 110 clinical conjunctivitis isolates, 26 keratitis isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and 10 endophthalmitis isolates each of MRSA, methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), MR, and MS coagulase-negative Staphylococcus.

TOLERABILITY

Six uninfected rabbits were topically treated in both eyes with 0.5% tigecycline, vehicle, or saline every 15 min for 3 h.

EFFICACY

Thirty-two rabbits were intrastromally injected with 700 Colony Forming Units (CFU) of MRSA in both eyes and were separated into 4 groups (n = 8): tigecycline 0.5%; vancomycin 5%; saline; and no treatment (euthanized before treatment for baseline CFU). Four hours after MRSA challenge, topical treatment of 1 drop every 15 min for 5 h was initiated. One hour after treatment, the corneas were harvested for CFU. The data were analyzed nonparametrically.

RESULTS

In vitro: Tigecycline demonstrated lower MICs than the other tested antibiotics against gram-positive organisms, especially MRSA, while MICs against gram-negative pathogens, including fluoroquinolone-resistant P. aeruginosa, appeared to be in the treatable range with aggressive topical therapy.

TOLERABILITY

0.5% tigecycline was graded as minimally irritating.

EFFICACY

0.5% tigecycline and vancomycin produced similar reductions in CFU and were less than saline (P < 0.05). Tigecycline and vancomycin demonstrated 99.9% reductions compared with baseline CFU.

CONCLUSIONS

Tigecycline is a potential candidate for a topical ocular antibiotic.

Variation in potency and spectrum of tigecycline activity against bacterial strains from U.S. medical centers since its approval for clinical use (2006 to 2012)

Tigecycline was initially approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in June 2005. We assessed the evolution of tigecycline in vitro activities since the initial approval of tigecycline for clinical use by analyzing the results of 7 years (2006 to 2012) of data from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program in the United States. We also analyzed trends over time for key resistance phenotypes. The analyses included 68,608 unique clinical isolates collected from 29 medical centers and tested for susceptibility using reference broth microdilution methods. Tigecycline was highly active against Gram-positive organisms, with MIC50 and MIC90 values of 0.12 and 0.25 μg/ml for Staphylococcus aureus (28,278 strains; >99.9% susceptible), 0.06 to 0.12 and 0.12 to 0.25 μg/ml for enterococci (99.3 to 99.6% susceptible), and ≤0.03 and ≤0.03 to 0.06 μg/ml for streptococci (99.9 to 100.0% susceptible), respectively. When tested against 20,457 Enterobacteriaceae strains, tigecycline MIC50 and MIC90 values were 0.25 and 1 μg/ml, respectively (98.3% susceptible using U.S. FDA breakpoints). No trend toward increasing tigecycline resistance (nonsusceptibility) was observed for any species or group during the study period. The prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Enterobacteriaceae increased from 4.4 and 0.5%, in 2006 to 8.5 and 1.5% in 2012, respectively. During the same period, the prevalence of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. with an extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) phenotype increased from 5.8 and 9.1% to 11.1 and 20.4%, respectively, whereas rates of meropenem-nonsusceptible Klebsiella pneumoniae escalated from 2.2% in 2006 to 10.8% in 2012. The results of this investigation show that tigecycline generally retained potent activities against clinically important organisms isolated in U.S. institutions, including MDR organism subsets of Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens.

Management of serious meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: what are the limits?

Severe (life-threatening) meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection continues to be treated with vancomycin despite accumulating evidence of poor outcome, increasing resistance and unachievable pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) targets. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) susceptibility breakpoint for vancomycin was recently reduced to 2 mg/L. Whilst the great majority of clinical isolates are thus still classified as susceptible, the available clinical evidence argues for a method-dependent breakpoint of 0.5 mg/L (broth dilution) or 1.0 mg/L (Etest), which would classify many strains as resistant, or at best intermediate. However, automated susceptibility testing systems are not currently capable of performing accurately at this low level, and such low breakpoints are unsatisfactory because the poor reproducibility of tests (plus or minus one doubling dilution) results in a critical non-reproducibility around the modal MIC of 1 mg/L described in most published data. Therefore, vancomycin should be used with caution in severe (life-threatening) staphylococcal disease and the MIC should always be reported by method. Daptomycin is generally preferred for bacteraemia/endocarditis and linezolid for pneumonia. Better outcome data for vancomycin, based on achievable PK/PD targets and using robust MIC tests, are urgently required.

Diabetic foot infections: microbiological aspects, current and future antibiotic therapy focusing on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Diabetic patients are at increased risk of complicated skin, skin structure and bone infections including infections of diabetic foot ulcerations (DFU). Analyses of epidemiology and microbial pathogenicity show that staphylococci seem to be predestined to induce such infections. In addition, multidrug resistance particularly due to an increasing prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) seems to be the challenge for effective antibiotic therapy. With regard to infections with MRSA, classical agents like vancomycin, linezolid, fosfomycin or trimethroprim-sulphametoxazol might be agents of choice in DFU. New-generation drugs including broad-spectrum tetracyclines like tigecycline, first and second generation of cyclic lipopeptides, anti-MRSA β-lactams including ceftobiprole and anti-MRSA antibodies are developed or in progress and the hope for the future.