Low-dose thalidomide and donor lymphocyte infusion as adoptive immunotherapy after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma

Adoptive cellular therapy after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Effective cellular therapy using CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cells for the treatment of advanced B-cell malignancies raises the question of whether the administration of adoptive cellular therapy (ACT) posttransplant could reduce relapse and improve survival. Moreover, several early phase clinical studies have shown the potential beneficial effects of administration of tumor-associated antigen-specific T-cells and natural killer cells posttransplant for high-risk patients, aiming to decrease relapse and possibly improve survival. In this article, we present an in-depth review of ACT after transplantation, which has the potential to significantly improve the efficacy of this procedure and revolutionize this field.

Outcomes in newly diagnosed young or high-risk myeloma patients receiving tandem autologous/allogeneic transplant followed by bortezomib maintenance: a phase II study

Despite novel drugs and autologous HCT, MM remains incurable, with short survival in patients with poor biological characteristics. Allo HCT may be curative in some patients but is hampered by high rates of toxicity and relapse. We hypothesized that bortezomib (BTZ), with its anti-myeloma and immunologic properties, could improve PFS and cGVHD after allo HCT in newly diagnosed MM patients. In this prospective phase II study, we included 39 young (≤50 years) and high-risk patients who received a tandem auto-allo HCT followed by BTZ. Patients had prospective minimal residual disease (MRD) evaluations using Next-Generation Flow cytometry prior to allo HCT, prior BTZ and every 3 months for 2 years. With a median follow-up of 48 months, we report PFS and OS at 5 years of 41% and 80%, with a non-relapse mortality of 12%. Incidences of grade II-IV aGVHD at 12 months and moderate/severe cGVHD at 2 years were 26% and 57%. In a multivariate analysis model including cytogenetics, ISS and MRD status, MRD positivity prior to allo HCT (HR 3.75, p = 0.037), prior BTZ (HR 11.3, p = 0.018) and 3 months post-BTZ initiation (HR 9.7, p = 0.001) was highly predictive of progression. Peritransplant MRD assessment thus strongly predicts disease progression.

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with High-Risk Multiple Myeloma: Utopia or Continuous Challenge in Aiming for Cure?

OPINION STATEMENT

Nowadays, several novel agents have been introduced in the treatment of multiple myeloma, not only resulting in high response rates and prolonged survival but also offering good quality of life. However, the potential of cure, especially for patients with advanced or unfavorable disease features, remains elusive. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, based mainly on the graft vs. myeloma effect, can offer prolonged disease control and probability of cure but unfortunately at the cost of considerable transplant-related toxicity rates. Therefore, the role of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the treatment of multiple myeloma has been called into question. Recently, several studies, particularly those with long-term follow-up, demonstrated a trend of survival superiority for allografted patients with high-risk disease. These data fuel again the interest in allogeneic stem cell transplantation for selected patients with high-risk multiple myeloma, especially if the high remission rates which can be achieved with the currently used treatment protocols could be long-life sustained through the additional exploitation of the long-lasting anti-multiple myeloma effect, originating from the allograft.

Newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients treated with tandem auto-allogeneic stem cell transplant have better overall survival with similar outcomes at time of relapse compared to patients who received autologous transplant only

BACKGROUND

Long-term survival in patients progressing after tandem autologous-allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT) has been reported, suggesting a persistent graft-vs-myeloma (GvM) effect even after post-transplant progression.

METHODS

In order to confirm this observation, we updated the results of our previously published cohort of 92 newly diagnosed myeloma patients who received tandem transplant and compared them with 81 contemporary patients who received autologous transplant only.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 13.1 and 10.2 years, respectively, median overall survival (OS) in the tandem group has not been reached, compared with 6.1 years after auto-SCT (P ≤ .001). Disease progression occurred less frequently after tandem transplant, with an estimated 10-year cumulative incidence of 49% vs 76% (P ≤ .001). Cumulative incidence of extensive chronic graft-vs-host disease (cGVHD) was high at 83%, with modest benefits on OS (60% vs 49%, P = .550) but sharp improvement of progression-free survival (PFS; 55% vs 10%, P = .002) at 10 years associated with development of cGVHD. After first progression, median OS was 5.8 years in tandem and 5.2 years in the auto-group (P = .062); median PFS was also similar.

CONCLUSION

Despite confirmation of better outcomes after upfront tandem transplant, our data do not support persistence of a strong, clinically significant graft-vs-myeloma effect after first progression, emphasizing the need to better characterize the GvM effect.

Relapse after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma: Survival Outcomes and Factors Influencing Them

Many patients with multiple myeloma (MM) eventually relapse even after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) for curative intent. Over the past decade, outcomes for patients with MM have improved significantly with the availability of new therapies, including next-generation proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory agents, and, more recently, monoclonal antibodies. Although several published studies have evaluated the outcomes of alloHCT for MM, the data on survival outcomes in patients with MM experiencing disease relapse following alloHCT are limited. In addition, the predictors for postrelapse survival in these patients are not known. In this study, we examined the outcomes of a single-center cohort of 60 patients with MM who experienced relapse or progression after alloHCT. In addition, we evaluated the use of salvage regimens for treatment of relapsed MM and analyzed the predictors for improved postrelapse survival. After a median follow-up of 2.2 years from the time of relapse, the median duration of postrelapse survival was 1.8 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2 to 5.0 years). Patients received a median of 3 lines of therapy (range, 0 to 10) for treatment of MM beyond the post-alloHCT relapse/progression. Multivariate analysis identified cytogenetic risk (standard risk versus high risk; hazard ratio [HR], .34; P = .01), time to relapse after alloHCT (>12 months versus ≤12 months: HR, .41; P = .04), and occurrence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) before relapse (GVHD versus no GVHD: HR, 2.89; P = .01) significantly affected postrelapse survival. These data illustrate that long-term myeloma control and survival is attainable in those relapsing/progressing after alloHCT and suggest that the synergism between novel therapies and the allogeneic immune platform is the key to improved survival in this high-risk patient population.

Graft-Versus-Tumor Effect in Major Histocompatibility Complex-Mismatched Mouse Liver Transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) is currently considered an important method in treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and an alternative treatment for other liver malignancies. Here, we demonstrated that the graft-versus-tumor (GVT) effect exists in allogeneic liver transplantation (allo LT). Recipient-derived T cells played a critical role in the GVT process of allo LT, as demonstrated by extensive infiltration and significant activation of recipient T cells in the tumor after surgery. Moreover, this process was related to donor-derived T/B cells by improving the immune microenvironment in the tumor, as demonstrated by elevated levels of interferon-γ (IFN-γ), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-2 (IL-2), IL-6, IL-16, chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 10 (CXCL10), and CXCL11 and decreased levels of IL-10 and IL-4 at tumor sites. Additionally, tacrolimus (FK506) treatment inhibited the GVT effect on allo LT. Donor liver-derived T/B cells infiltrate extrahepatic tumors to trigger a strong T-cell-mediated immune response and thus improve the tumor immune microenvironment.

Chimeric antigen receptor T cell immunotherapy for multiple myeloma: A review of current data and potential clinical applications

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignant plasma cell disorder that remains incurable for most patients despite significant improvements achieved with modern therapy. Tumor evasion is a key process in the pathogenesis of MM and a compromised immune system is associated with more aggressive forms of the disease. In contrast, the emergence of myeloma-specific immune responses after both autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation is associated with better prognosis. Adoptive T cell therapies may improve specific anti-myeloma immunity resulting in long-lasting remissions. CAR T cell therapies for MM are at an early stage of clinical development. To date, anti-BCMA CAR T cells have shown the greatest results in early-phase clinical trials. Toxicities have included cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity. Current areas of research in CAR T cell therapies include the use of gene-editing to enhance their effectiveness and safety, the integration of CAR T cells with other therapies (immunomodulatory drugs, checkpoint inhibitors) and CAR T cells to target multiple antigens.

CAR T Cells and Other Cellular Therapies for Multiple Myeloma: 2018 Update

Cellular therapies are a rapidly evolving approach to myeloma treatment, which bring a unique mechanism of action with the potential to overcome drug resistance and induce long-term remissions. Two primary approaches are being studied: non-gene-modified strategies, which rely on the endogenous anti-myeloma T-cell repertoire, and gene-modified strategies, which introduce a new T-cell receptor (TCR) or a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) to confer novel antigen specificity. CAR T cells show the greatest activity to date. Multiple antigen targets, including B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), CD19, CD38, CD138, and SLAMF7, are being explored for myeloma, and BCMA has emerged as the most promising. Preliminary data from four phase I studies of BCMA CAR T cells, each using a different CAR construct, that involved 90 evaluable patients with relapsed/refractory disease have been reported. These data show response rates of 60% to 100%, including minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative complete remissions, at effective doses (> 10⁸ CAR-positive cells) after lymphodepleting conditioning. Response durability has been more variable, likely related to differences in CAR T-cell products, lymphodepleting regimens, patient selection criteria, and/or underlying biology/prognostic factors. In the two most recent studies, however, most patients remained progression free with median follow-up time of 6 to 10 months; some ongoing remissions lasted more than 1 year. Toxicities are similar to those from CD19 CAR T cells and include cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity that is reversible but can be severe. Multiple BCMA CAR T-cell studies are ongoing. Future directions include combinations with immunomodulatory drugs, checkpoint inhibitors, or other CAR T cells, as well as use of gene-edited cellular products to enhance the safety and efficacy of this approach.

Long-Term Results of Prophylactic Donor Lymphocyte Infusions for Patients with Multiple Myeloma after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

The major reason for treatment failure after allografting in multiple myeloma (MM) is relapse. Donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs) are considered a valuable post-transplant strategy mainly for relapsed patients but using them to prevent relapse in MM has been reported rarely. In the present study, we examined the efficacy of prophylactic DLIs after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in myeloma patients with a long-term follow-up of more than 5 years. A total of 61 patients with MM who did not relapse or develop disease progression after allo-HSCT were treated with prophylactic DLI in an escalating fashion (overall 132 DLI procedures) to deepen remission status and prevent relapse. Overall response rate to DLI was 77%. Thirty-three patients (54%) upgraded their remission status, 41 patients (67%) achieved or maintained complete remission, and 26% achieved a molecular remission. Incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grade II to IV was 33% and no DLI-related mortality was noted. After a median follow-up of 68.7 months from first DLI the estimated 8-year progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in a landmark analysis was 43% (95% confidence interval [CI], 28% to 57%) and 67% (95% CI, 53% to 82%), respectively, with best outcome for patients who acquired molecular remission (8-year PFS was 62% and 8-year OS was 83%). Prophylactic escalating DLI in a selected cohort of MM patients to prevent relapse after allograft resulted in a low incidence of severe GVHD and encouraging long-term results, especially if molecular remission is achieved.

Hematologic Malignancies: Plasma Cell Disorders

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell malignancy characterized by the growth of tumor cells in the bone marrow. Properties of the tumor microenvironment provide both potential tumor-promoting and tumor-restricting properties. Targeting underlying immune triggers for evolution of tumors as well as direct attack of malignant plasma cells is an emerging focus of therapy for MM. The monoclonal antibodies daratumumab and elotuzumab, which target the plasma cell surface proteins CD38 and SLAMF7/CS1, respectively, particularly when used in combination with immunomodulatory agents and proteasome inhibitors, have resulted in high response rates and improved survival for patients with relapsed and refractory MM. A number of other monoclonal antibodies are in various stages of clinical development, including those targeting MM cell surface antigens, the bone marrow microenvironment, and immune effector T cells such as antiprogrammed cell death protein 1 antibodies. Bispecific preparations seek to simultaneously target MM cells and activate endogenous T cells to enhance efficacy. Cellular immunotherapy seeks to overcome the limitations of the endogenous antimyeloma immune response through adoptive transfer of immune effector cells with MM specificity. Allogeneic donor lymphocyte infusion can be effective but can cause graft-versus-host disease. The most promising approach appears to be genetically modified cellular therapy, in which T cells are given novel antigen specificity through expression of transgenic T-cell receptors (TCRs) or chimeric antigen receptors (CARs). CAR T cells against several different targets are under investigation in MM. Infusion of CD19-targeted CAR T cells following salvage autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) was safe and extended remission duration in a subset of patients with relapsed/refractory MM. CAR T cells targeting B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) appear most promising, with dramatic remissions seen in patients with highly refractory disease in three ongoing trials. Responses are associated with degree of CAR T-cell expansion/persistence and often toxicity, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity. Ongoing and future studies are exploring correlates of response, ways to mitigate toxicity, and "universal" CAR T cells.

Donor T-cell responses and disease progression patterns of multiple myeloma

Donor T-cells transferred after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) can result in long-term disease control in myeloma by the graft-versus-myeloma (GvM) effect. However, T-cell therapy may show differential effectiveness against bone marrow (BM) infiltration and focal myeloma lesions resulting in different control and progression patterns. Outcomes of 43 myeloma patients who underwent T-cell-depleted alloSCT with scheduled donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) were analyzed with respect to diffuse BM infiltration and focal progression. For comparison, 12 patients for whom a donor search was started but no alloSCT was performed, were analyzed. After DLI, complete disappearance of myeloma cells in BM occurred in 86% of evaluable patients. The probabilities of BM progression-free survival (PFS) at 2 years after start of donor search, alloSCT and DLI, were 17% (95% confidence interval 0-38%), 51% (36-66%), and 62% (44-80%) respectively. In contrast, the probabilities of focal PFS at 2 years after start of donor search, alloSCT and DLI, were 17% (0-38%), 30% (17-44%) and 28% (11-44%), respectively. Donor-derived T-cell responses effectively reduce BM infiltration, but not focal progression in myeloma, illustrating potent immunological responses in BM with only limited effect of T-cells on focal lesions.

New drugs and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for hematological malignancies: do they have a role in bridging, consolidating or conditioning transplantation treatment?

INTRODUCTION

Novel targeted therapies and monoclonal antibodies can be combined with allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) at different time-points: 1) before the transplant to reduce tumour burden, 2) as part of the conditioning in place of or in addition to conventional agents 3) after the transplant to allow long-term disease control. Areas covered: This review focuses on the current integration of new drugs with allo-SCT for the treatment of major hematological malignancies for which allo-SCT has been a widely-adopted therapy. Expert opinion: After having been used as single agent salvage treatments in relapsed patients after allo-SCT or in combination with donor lymphocyte infusions, many new drugs have also been safely employed before allo-SCT as a bridge to transplantation or after it as planned consolidation/maintenance. This era of new drugs has opened new important opportunities to 'smartly' combine 'targeted drugs and cell therapies' in new treatment paradigms that may lead to higher cure rates or longer disease control in patients with hematological malignancies.

Outcomes of unrelated cord blood transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma: a survey on behalf of Eurocord, the Cord Blood Committee of Cellular Therapy and Immunobiology Working Party, and the Chronic Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT

Although allogeneic stem cell transplantation is not a standard therapy for multiple myeloma, some patients can benefit from this intense therapy. There are few reports on outcomes after umbilical cord blood transplantation in multiple myeloma, and investigation of this procedure is warranted. We retrospectively analyzed 95 patients, 85 with multiple myeloma and 10 with plasma cell leukemia, receiving single or double umbilical cord blood transplantation from 2001 to 2013. Median follow up was 41 months. The majority of patients received a reduced intensity conditioning. The cumulative incidence of neutrophil engraftment was 97%±3% at 60 days, and that of 100-day acute graft-versus-host disease grade II-IV was 41%±5%. Chronic graft-versus-host disease at two years was 22%±4%. Relapse and non-relapse mortality was 47%±5% and 29%±5% at three years, respectively. Three-year progression-free survival and overall survival were 24%±5% and 40%±5%, respectively. Anti-thymocyte globulin was associated with decreased incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease, higher non-relapse mortality, decreased overall and progression-free survival. Patients with high cytogenetic risk had higher relapse, and worse overall and progression-free survival. In conclusion, umbilical cord blood transplantation is feasible for multiple myeloma patients.

Donor lymphocyte infusion after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is considered the cornerstone in the treatment of several malignant and not malignant hematological diseases. However, relapse of hematological disease after allo-SCT is considered the most challenging point in the field. The risk can be reduced through optimal patients, donor and disease selection before allo-SCT, but harnessing donor immune system is an appealing way to treat or avoid disease relapse. Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) is a simple and effective therapy after allo-SCT. In this paper, the efficacy of DLI will be analyzed in different hematological diseases, focusing also on their therapeutic or pre-emptive use.

Favorable long-term outcome of patients with multiple myeloma using a frontline tandem approach with autologous and non-myeloablative allogeneic transplantation

Despite survival improvement with novel agents and use of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), cure of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) remains anecdotal. Initial observations suggested that chronic GvHD was accompanied by an anti-myeloma effect after myeloablative HSCT, but unfortunately this procedure was hampered by high non-relapse mortality (NRM). To maximize the anti-myeloma effect and minimize NRM, we developed a non-myeloablative (NMA) regimen associated with a high incidence of chronic GvHD and tested its efficacy on patient survival and disease eradication. From 2001 to 2010, 92 patients aged ⩽ 65 years with a compatible sibling donor received autologous HSCT followed by an outpatient NMA allogeneic HSCT using a conditioning of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide. Patient median age was 52 years and 97% presented Durie-Salmon stages II-III disease. After a median follow-up of 8.8 years, probability of 10-year progression free and overall survival were 41% and 62%, respectively. Although the cumulative incidence of extensive chronic GvHD was high (at 79%), the majority of long-term survivors were off immunosuppressive drugs by year 5 and NRM was low (at 10%). Together, our results suggest that potential MM cure can be achieved with NMA transplantation regimens that maximize graft-versus-myeloma effect and minimize NRM.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma: immunotherapy and new drugs

INTRODUCTION

Autologous (auto) stem cell transplantation (SCT) and the development of new drugs have improved the survival of multiple myeloma (MM) patients. By contrast, though potentially curative, the use of allogeneic (allo)-SCT is controversial.

AREAS COVERED

A review has been conducted to examine the current evidence for the use of allo-SCT in MM. We have examined novel cell therapies that may be exploited to induce myeloma-specific immune responses including the new promising frontier of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T and -natural killer (NK) cells.

EXPERT OPINION

One of the major controversies facing researchers in exploring the allo approach is the remarkable recent treatment improvement observed with second- and third-generation proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs, monoclonal antibodies and deacetylase inhibitors. Despite these great advances, the disease remains to be incurable and allo-SCT may still play a role in the cure of MM. We think that allo-SCT conserves a role in MM and its curative potential in high-risk patients should be explored in the setting of control clinical trials. Novel cell therapies such as CAR technologies may open new avenues of research toward a potential cure. Data from currently ongoing prospective studies will be helpful to clarify pending clinical questions.

Beyond consolidation: auto-SCT and immunotherapy for plasma cell myeloma

Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) is the standard consolidation therapy for plasma cell myeloma patients following induction therapy. Auto-HCT improves disease-free survival (DFS), but is generally not curative. The allogeneic HCT experience demonstrated that T-cell immunotherapy can confer long-term DFS. Preclinical and clinical data indicate that myeloma-associated Ags elicit humoral and cellular immune responses (IRs) in myeloma patients. These findings strongly suggest that the immunotherapeutic strategies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, therapeutic cancer vaccines and adoptive cellular therapies, are promising avenues of clinical research that may be most applicable in the minimal residual disease state following auto-HCT. These strategies are designed to prime or augment antimyeloma IRs and promote a 'host-vs-myeloma' effect that may result in durable DFS. Innovative clinical trials investigating immune checkpoint inhibitors and cancer vaccines have demonstrated that robust immunity against myeloma-associated Ags can be elicited in the setting of auto-HCT. A diverse array of immunotherapeutic strategies have entered clinical trials in myeloma, including PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, DC/myeloma cell fusion vaccines and adoptive chimeric Ag receptor T-cell therapy, and further investigation of combinations of immunologic and pharmaceutical agents are expected in the near future. In this review, we will discuss the preclinical data supporting immunotherapy in auto-HCT for myeloma, clinical investigation of these strategies and the future prospects of immunotherapy in pursuit of the goal of curative therapy.

Cancer-testis antigen 7 expression and immune responses following allogeneic stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma

Cancer-testis antigen 7 (CT7) is the most frequently and consistently expressed MAGE antigen in multiple myeloma, exhibits tissue-restricted expression, and is an independent negative prognostic factor for multiple myeloma. We sought to characterize CT7 protein expression in the bone marrow of patients with multiple myeloma undergoing allogeneic T cell-depleted hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloTCD-HSCT), and to examine the significance of CT7-specific cellular immune responses. We further aimed to determine CT7-derived immunogenic epitopes and their associated allelic restrictions. CT7 protein expression in neoplastic CD138(+) plasma cells was evaluated by immunohistochemistry in bone marrow biopsies from 10 patients. CT7 was present in 8 of 10 patients. Longitudinal analyses of the 10 patients revealed an association between CT7 expression and prognosis. Longitudinal monitoring of CT7-specific T cells revealed an association between increased frequencies of CT7-specific T cells and reductions in specific myeloma markers. Epitope-specific reactivity to the nonamer FLAMLKNTV was detected by intracellular IFNγ assay in peripheral blood (PB) and bone marrow-derived T cells from HLA-A*0201(+) patients. Serial monitoring of PB CT7-specific T-cell frequencies in 4 HLA-A*0201(+) patients by HLA-A*0201-CT7(1087-1095) tetramer staining revealed an association with disease course. Phenotypic analyses revealed bone marrow enrichment for central memory CT7-specific T cells, while effector memory cells dominated the PB. Together, these findings support the development of immunotherapeutic strategies that aim to enhance CT7-directed immune responses for the treatment of multiple myeloma.

Immune-modulating drugs and hypomethylating agents to prevent or treat relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is a curative treatment option for many hematological diseases, and the numbers of transplantations are steadily increasing worldwide. Major progress has been made in lowering treatment-related mortality by reducing intensity of the conditioning regimen and by improving supportive care (eg, for infectious complications). Accordingly, relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation has become the major cause for treatment failure. Major efforts to prevent or treat relapse are focused on cellular- (T cell, natural killer cell), cytokine-, or antibody-based strategies to enhance the graft-versus-tumor effect or circumvent immunoescape. In the more recent years, new classes of agents have shown activity in several hematological malignancies, and besides their immediate antitumor activity, most of them also possess immune-modulatory qualities that may be useful alone or in combination with adoptive immunotherapy after allogeneic stem cell transplantation to enhance graft-versus-tumor effects. Here, we summarize the current knowledge and potential use of 2 of these compounds in preventing or treating relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation, namely immune-modulating drugs and hypomethylating agents.

Cellular therapy following allogeneic stem-cell transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) is the most effective approach for many patients with hematologic malignancies. Unfortunately, relapse remains the most common cause of death after allogeneic HSCT, and the prognosis of relapsed disease is poor for most patients. Induction of a graft-versus-leukemia (GVL), or graft-versus-tumor, effect through the use of donor leukocyte infusion (DLI), or donor lymphocyte infusion, has been remarkably successful for relapsed chronic myelogenous leukemia. Unfortunately, response to DLI in other hematologic malignancies is much less common and depends on many factors including histology, pace and extent of relapse, and time from HSCT to relapse. Furthermore, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is common after DLI and often limits successful immunotherapy. Ultimately, manipulations to minimize GVHD while preserving or enhancing GVL are necessary to improve outcomes for relapse after allogeneic HSCT.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation from unrelated donors in multiple myeloma: study from the Italian Bone Marrow Donor Registry

To evaluate trends in allografting from unrelated donors, we conducted a study on 196 consecutive myeloma patients transplanted between 2000 and 2009 in Italy. Twenty-eight percent, 37%, and 35%, respectively, received myeloablative, reduced-intensity, and nonmyeloablative conditioning. In these 3 cohorts, 1-year and 5-year transplantation-related mortalities were 28.8% and 37.0%, 20.3% and 31.3%, and 25.0% and 30.3%, respectively (P = .745). Median overall survival (OS) and event-free survival from transplantation for the 3 cohorts were 29 and 10 months, 11 and 6 months, and 32 and 13 months, respectively (P = .039 and P = .049). Overall cumulative incidences of acute and chronic graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) were 46.1% and 51.1%. By Cox multivariate analyses, chronic GVHD was significantly associated with longer OS (hazard ratio [HR], .51; P = .009), whereas the use of peripheral blood stem cells was borderline significant (HR, .55; P = .051). Better response posttransplantation was associated with longer event-free survival (HR, 2.13 to 4.25; P < .001). Acute GVHD was associated with poorer OS (HR, 2.53; P = .001). This analysis showed a strong association of acute and chronic GVHD and depth of response posttransplantation with clinical outcomes. Long-term disease control remains challenging regardless of the conditioning. In the light of these results, prospective trials may be designed to better define the role of allografting from unrelated donors in myeloma.

Impact of high-risk cytogenetics and achievement of molecular remission on long-term freedom from disease after autologous-allogeneic tandem transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma

Within a prospective protocol, the incidence and impact of achievement of molecular remission (mCR) and high-risk cytogenetics was investigated in 73 patients with multiple myeloma (MM) after autologous (auto)-allogeneic (allo) tandem stem cell transplantation (SCT). After induction chemotherapy, patients received melphalan 200 mg/m(2) before undergoing auto-SCT, followed 3 months later by melphalan 140 mg/m(2) and fludarabine 180 mg/m(2) before allo-SCT. Sixteen patients had high-risk cytogenetic features, defined by positive FISH for del(17p13) and/or t(4;14). Overall, 66% of the patients achieved CR or near-CR, and 41% achieved mCR, which was sustained negative (at least 4 consecutive samples negative) in 15 patients (21%), with no significant difference in incidence between the patients with high-risk cytogenetics and others (P = .70). After a median follow-up of 6 years, overall 5-year progression-free survival was 29%, with no significant difference between del 17p13/t(4;14)-harboring patients and others (24% versus 30%; P = .70). The 5-year progression-free survival differed substantially according to the achieved remission: 17% for partial remission, 41% for CR, 57% for mCR, and 85% for sustained mCR. These results suggest that auto-allo tandem SCT may overcome the negative prognostic effect of del(17p13) and/or t(4;14) and that achievement of molecular remission resulted in long-term freedom from disease.

Donor CD3(+) lymphocyte infusion after reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic stem cell transplantation: single-center experience

Donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) can induce remission in patients with hematologic malignancies who relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. However, graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) remains a major complication of this strategy. We have used escalating doses of DLI for many years, and wanted to assess the risk factors for GVHD and transplant-related mortality as well as disease outcomes according to the reason for DLI. We analyzed 65 patients who received a total of 111 DLI for different reasons and at different intervals after transplantation. Median number of DLI was 2 (range, 1-4), median interval between transplantation and DLI was 9 months (range, 1-41 months) and median number of infused CD3(+) cells/kg recipient body weight was 2.5 × 10(7) (range, 1 × 10(6)-11.8 × 10(7)). Reasons for DLI were relapse or progression in 37 patients (57%), residual disease in 15 patients (23%), and persistence of mixed chimerism in 13 patients (20%). Seven patients (11%) developed acute GVHD grade II to IV and 5 patients (8%) developed extensive chronic GVHD. In univariate analysis, we could identify a transplantation-DLI interval ≤6 months, the dose of DLI (≥1 × 10(7)), and DLI number as predictive factors of GVHD. In multivariate analysis, these results were confirmed only for the transplantation-DLI interval (hazard ratio = 19.48; 2.23-170.34; p = 0.007). Our findings indicate that this form of adoptive immunotherapy is well tolerated and induces a low incidence of GVHD and transplant-related mortality, supporting further investigation as an upfront modality to enhance the graft-vs-tumor response in high-risk patients.

Targeting multiple-myeloma-induced immune dysfunction to improve immunotherapy outcomes

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell malignancy associated with high levels of monoclonal (M) protein in the blood and/or serum. MM can occur de novo or evolve from benign monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). Current translational research into MM focuses on the development of combination therapies directed against molecularly defined targets and that are aimed at achieving durable clinical responses. MM cells have a unique ability to evade immunosurveillance through several mechanisms including, among others, expansion of regulatory T cells (Treg), reduced T-cell cytotoxic activity and responsiveness to IL-2, defects in B-cell immunity, and induction of dendritic cell (DC) dysfunction. Immune defects could be a major cause of failure of the recent immunotherapy trials in MM. This article summarizes our current knowledge on the molecular determinants of immune evasion in patients with MM and highlights how these pathways can be targeted to improve patients' clinical outcome.

Lenalidomide plus donor-lymphocytes infusion after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation with reduced-intensity conditioning in patients with high-risk multiple myeloma

Myeloma relapse is the main cause of death after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. The aim of our observational study was to evaluate the anti-myeloma effect of lenalidomide followed by donor-lymphocyte infusion (DLI) as post-transplantation adoptive immunotherapy. Twelve patients with refractory myeloma were analyzed. The median age at transplantation was 56 years (range, 46-64 years). All patients received reduced-intensity conditioning. Patients were included if progressive or residual disease was observed at day +100 and if no signs of graft-vs-host disease were evident. DLIs were administered after two cycles of lenalidomide. Median dose of lenalidomide was 15 mg (range, 10-25 mg). Patients received a median of six cycles (range, 1-10 cycles). Nine patients (60%) received an escalating dose of DLI. The 1 and 2-year probability of progression-free survival was 75% and 50%, and overall survival was 83% and 69%, respectively. Median overall survival was not reached and median progression-free survival was 23 months. Lenalidomide is well tolerated after allogeneic stem cell transplantation; the combination with DLI did not cause a higher risk of graft-vs-host disease; an immunological synergistic effect was probably present with this strategy. This combination should be evaluated further in a larger cohort of patients.

Autologous haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation followed by allogeneic or autologous haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma (BMT CTN 0102): a phase 3 biological assignment trial

BACKGROUND

Autologous haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) improves survival in patients with multiple myeloma, but disease progression remains an issue. Allogeneic HSCT might reduce disease progression, but can be associated with high treatment-related mortality. Thus, we aimed to assess effectiveness of allogeneic HSCT with non-myeloablative conditioning after autologous HSCT compared with tandem autologous HSCT.

METHODS

In our phase 3 biological assignment trial, we enrolled patients with multiple myeloma attending 37 transplant centres in the USA. Patients (<70 years old) with adequate organ function who had completed at least three cycles of systemic antimyeloma therapy within the past 10 months were eligible for inclusion. We assigned patients to receive an autologous HSCT followed by an allogeneic HSCT (auto-allo group) or tandem autologous HSCTs (auto-auto group) on the basis of the availability of an HLA-matched sibling donor. Patients in the auto-auto group subsequently underwent a random allocation (1:1) to maintenance therapy (thalidomide plus dexamethasone) or observation. To avoid enrolment bias, we classified patients as standard risk or high risk on the basis of cytogenetics and β2-microglobulin concentrations. We used the Kaplan-Meier method to estimate differences in 3-year progression-free survival (PFS; primary endpoint) between patients with standard-risk disease in the auto-allo group and the best results from the auto-auto group (maintenance, observation, or pooled). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00075829.

FINDINGS

Between Dec 17, 2003, and March 30, 2007, we enrolled 710 patients, of whom 625 had standard-risk disease and received an autologous HSCT. 156 (83%) of 189 patients with standard-risk disease in the auto-allo group and 366 (84%) of 436 in the auto-auto group received a second transplant. 219 patients in the auto-auto group were randomly assigned to observation and 217 to receive maintenance treatment, of whom 168 (77%) completed this treatment. PFS and overall survival did not differ between maintenance and observation groups and pooled data were used. Kaplan-Meier estimates of 3-year PFS were 43% (95% CI 36-51) in the auto-allo group and 46% (42-51) in the auto-auto group (p=0·671); overall survival also did not differ at 3 years (77% [95% CI 72-84] vs 80% [77-84]; p=0·191). Within 3 years, 87 (46%) of 189 patients in the auto-allo group had grade 3-5 adverse events as did 185 (42%) of 436 patients in the auto-auto group. The adverse events that differed most between groups were hyperbilirubinaemia (21 [11%] patients in the auto-allo group vs 14 [3%] in the auto-auto group) and peripheral neuropathy (11 [6%] in the auto-allo group vs 52 [12%] in the auto-auto group).

INTERPRETATION

Non-myeloablative allogeneic HSCT after autologous HSCT is not more effective than tandem autologous HSCT for patients with standard-risk multiple myeloma. Further enhancement of the graft versus myeloma effect and reduction in transplant-related mortality are needed to improve the allogeneic HSCT approach.

FUNDING

US National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the National Cancer Institute.

Reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: a concise review

Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) can result in reliable donor engraftment, relatively low treatment-related mortality, and sustained remissions in the treatment of multiple myeloma. However, substantial cytoreduction pre-allografting is often necessary because of a variable graft-versus-myeloma effect. The use of RIC allogeneic HSCT immediately after autologous HSCT provides a temporal separation between tumor reduction by high-dose chemotherapy and the graft-versus-myeloma effect. There are currently a number of prospective trials attempting to address the issue of whether this strategy leads to decreases in relapse and/or improvement in overall survival as compared with double autologous transplants. Unfortunately, similar to autografting, relapse remains the major cause of treatment failure after RIC allogeneic HSCT. To improve treatment results with allografting, consideration should be given to incorporating immunomodulatory drugs and targeted treatments to enhance pretransplantation remission status, as posttransplantation maintenance therapy, or in combination with donor lymphocyte infusions for refractory or relapsed disease. Studies exploring these strategies are ongoing.

Approaches to relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Relapse has become the leading cause of death following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Despite improved understanding of the biology that underlies the graft-versus-leukemia/tumor effect the relapse rate did not decrease over the past 20 years. In general, prognosis is poor for patients who relapsed to an allograft since effective treatment options are limited. Here, we review the available and upcoming treatment approaches for relapse.

RECENT FINDINGS

Treatment of relapse after allogeneic HSCT has been rarely investigated systematically and results differ substantially from diseases. Withdrawal of immunosuppressive medication, donor lymphocyte infusions with or without chemotherapy and/or second allogeneic HSCT are the most used options. New specific cellular approaches such as disease-specific T-cells, alloreactive natural killer cells or vaccination strategies are under investigation. Novel agents such as tyrosine-kinase inhibitors, hypomethylating agents, monoclonal antibodies, immunomodulating drugs, or proteasome-inhibitors either alone or in combination with adoptive immunotherapy are upcoming promising options, but valid data are lacking so far.

SUMMARY

With some exceptions (chronic myeloid leukemia), treatment options for patients who relapse are limited. The results are poor and the majority of patients ultimately die of their disease. More effort and research is needed to prevent and treat relapse after allogeneic HSCT.

Unrelated stem cell transplantation for patients with multiple myeloma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The role of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) in treatment of myeloma patients is still controversial. Meanwhile, the numbers of unrelated SCT for hematological diseases in Europe are higher than for human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical sibling transplantations, but in multiple myeloma only 39% of the allogeneic transplantations are performed from unrelated donors and only a minority were done within prospective clinical trials.

RECENT FINDINGS

The few published data of unrelated SCT in multiple myeloma reported a higher treatment-related mortality for standard myeloablative conditioning in comparison to reduced-intensity conditioning. Despite the heterogeneous patient selection in the trial, lower nonrelapse mortality and improved survival can be achieved by careful donor selection (10/10 HLA-alleles, male donor). Natural killer-alloreactivity might play a role, but conclusive data are lacking. Transplantation in more advanced or refractory patients is associated with an inferior outcome. The results of an unrelated SCT seem to be comparable to those of HLA-identical siblings, but a direct comparison is lacking so far.

SUMMARY

Unrelated SCT in multiple myeloma is feasible, but prospective clinical trials using unrelated stem cell donors are urgently needed to define the role of an unrelated SCT in multiple myeloma in the era of novel agents.

Novel agents to improve outcome of allogeneic transplantation for patients with multiple myeloma

Over the last few decades therapy for multiple myeloma has improved remarkably. In particular, the introduction of novel agents has allowed improved response rates prior to, and after, stem cell transplantation with extension of progression-free survival in high-risk patients. Nevertheless, most patients relapse, leaving multiple myeloma an incurable disease. Despite being the only treatment option that has real curative potential, allogeneic transplantation has not shown its superiority to autologous transplantation due to its high morbidity and mortality rates. This review highlights how novel agents might help to reduce treatment-related mortality and to improve tumor control prior to and post-allogeneic stem cell transplant, which will hopefully result in significantly improved long-term disease control, and maybe a cure following this treatment modality.

Allogeneic immunotherapy to optimize the graft-versus-tumor effect: concepts and controversies

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) can be considered the most successful method of adoptive immunotherapy of cancer. It is successful in part because of the potent graft-versus-tumor (GVT) effects of the donor graft, which are independent of the conditioning regimen. This potent GVT reaction can be harnessed in some cases to treat patients who relapse after allogeneic SCT with the use of donor leukocyte infusions (DLIs). This has led to the rapid development of reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens for allogeneic SCT, an approach that relies primarily on GVT activity. However, the effects of GVT have clear disease specificity and remain associated with significant GVHD. Optimization of GVT induction will require a better understanding of the important target antigens and effector cells, as well as the development of methods that enhance GVT reactivity without excessive GVHD. The appropriate clinical setting and timing for GVT induction need to be defined more clearly, but ultimately, the immunologic control of cancer through allogeneic adoptive immunotherapy represents one of the most potent and promising therapeutic strategies for patients with hematologic malignancies.

NCI First International Workshop on the Biology, Prevention, and Treatment of Relapse after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Report from the Committee on Treatment of Relapse after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Relapse is a major cause of treatment failure after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT). Treatment options for relapse have been inadequate, and the majority of patients ultimately die of their disease. There is no standard approach to treating relapse after alloHSCT. Withdrawal of immune suppression and donor lymphocyte infusions are commonly used for all diseases; although these interventions are remarkably effective for relapsed chronic myelogenous leukemia, they have limited efficacy in other hematologic malignancies. Conventional and novel chemotherapy, monoclonal antibody therapy, targeted therapies, and second transplants have been utilized in a variety of relapsed diseases, but reports on these therapies are generally anecdotal and retrospective. As such, there is an immediate need for well-designed, disease-specific trials for treatment of relapse after alloHSCT. This report summarizes current treatment options under investigation for relapse after alloHSCT in a disease-specific manner. In addition, recommendations are provided for specific areas of research necessary in the treatment of relapse after alloHSCT.

International Myeloma Working Group Consensus Statement Regarding the Current Status of Allogeneic Stem-Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma

Purpose

To define consensus statement regarding allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (Allo-SCT) as a treatment option for multiple myeloma (MM) on behalf of International Myeloma Working Group.

Patients and Methods

In this review, results from prospective and retrospective studies of Allo-SCT in MM are summarized.

Results

Although the introduction of reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) has lowered the high treatment-related mortality associated with myeloablative conditioning, convincing evidence is lacking that Allo-RIC improves the survival compared with autologous stem-cell transplantation.

Conclusion

New strategies are necessary to make Allo-SCT safer and more effective for patients with MM. Until this is achieved, Allo-RIC in myeloma should only be recommended in the context of clinical trials.

Treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma in the era of novel agents

The introduction of the Immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) and proteasome inhibitors, used either as a single-agent or combined with classic anti-myeloma therapies, has improved the outcome for patients with relapsed myeloma. However, there is currently no generally accepted standard treatment for relapsed/refractory myeloma patients, partly because of the absence of trials comparing the efficacy of the novel agents in relapsed/refractory myeloma. Choice of a new treatment regimen depends on both patient and disease-specific characteristics. A lenalidomide-based regimen is the first choice in patients with neuropathy, while bortezomib has the highest efficacy in patients with renal insufficiency and is not associated with increased risk of thromboembolism. A second autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) can be applied in patients with a progression-free period of ≥ 18-24 months after the first auto-SCT. In high-risk relapse such as occurring early after auto-SCT consolidation with allogeneic SCT can be considered. In this review we provide an overview of the various salvage regimens and give recommendations for treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma in different clinical settings.

Allogenic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation with reduced-intensity conditioning in patients with refractory and recurrent multiple myeloma: long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) with myeloablative conditioning is potentially curative therapy for myeloma, but is reportedly associated with a high risk of nonrecurrence mortality (NRM). Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allows for the reduction of NRM, but the recurrence rate is increased. The role and timing of allogeneic SCT in the disease course remains controversial. To the authors' knowledge, there are limited data regarding the long-term outcome of RIC in the recurrent/refractory setting.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted of SCT outcomes in 50 patients who received RIC for recurrent/refractory myeloma between the years 2001 and 2004. All patients were given fludarabine-melphalan based conditioning and stem cell grafts from a related (n=27) or unrelated donor (n=23).

RESULTS

The median age was 53 years. Forty-seven patients failed a prior autologous SCT. Thirty patients were in disease remission at the time of SCT and 20 had stable or progressive disease. With a median follow-up of 6.4 years (range, 5-7.9 years), the overall and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 34% and 26%, respectively. The NRM rate was 26%. Adverse prognostic factors for survival included SCT not in remission, long duration of disease (>5 years from diagnosis), and transplantation from a female donor to a male recipient. The 7-year PFS in 19 patients with none of these adverse prognostic factors was 47%. Chronic graft versus host disease and the achievement of complete remission after SCT were associated with improved outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Allogeneic SCT can result in long-term PFS in a subset of myeloma patients who fail prior therapy and should be considered early after failure and after achieving remission.

NCI First International Workshop on The Biology, Prevention and Treatment of Relapse after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: report from the committee on prevention of relapse following allogeneic cell transplantation for hematologic malignancies

Prevention of relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is the most likely approach to improve survival of patients treated for hematologic malignancies. Herein we review the limits of currently available transplant therapies and the innovative strategies being developed to overcome resistance to therapy or to fill therapeutic modalities not currently available. These novel strategies include nonimmunologic therapies, such as targeted preparative regimens and posttransplant drug therapy, as well as immunologic interventions, including graft engineering, donor lymphocyte infusions, T cell engineering, vaccination, and dendritic cell-based approaches. Several aspects of the biology of the malignant cells as well as the host have been identified that obviate success of even these newer strategies. To maximize the potential for success, we recommend pursuing research to develop additional targeted therapies to be used in the preparative regimen or as maintenance posttransplant, better characterize the T cell and dendritic cells subsets involved in graft-versus-host disease and the graft-versus-leukemia/tumor effect, identify strategies for timing immunologic or nonimmunologic therapies to eliminate the noncycling cancer stem cell, identify more targets for immunotherapies, develop new vaccines that will not be limited by HLA, and develop methods to identify populations at very high risk for relapse to accelerate clinical development and avoid toxicity in patients not at risk for relapse.

Role of allogeneic transplantation in multiple myeloma in the era of new drugs

High-dose melphalan with autologous stem cell rescue has been regarded as the standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed myeloma up to the age of 65–70 years. The recent development of agents with potent anti-tumor activity such as thalidomide, lenalidomide and bortezomib has further improved overall survival and response rates. However, relapse is a continuous risk.

Allografting is a potentially curative treatment for a subset of multiple myeloma patients for its well documented graft-vs-myeloma effects. However, its role has been hotly debated. Even though molecular remissions have been reported up to 50% after high-dose myeloablative conditionings, their applications, given the high toxicity, have been for long limited to younger relapsed/refractory patients. These limitations have greatly been reduced through the introduction of non-myeloablative/reduced-intensity conditionings.

The introduction of new drugs, characterised by low risks of early mortality, indeed requires to define role and timing of an allograft to capture the subset of patients who may most benefit from graft-vs-myeloma effects.

Ultimately, new drugs should not be viewed as mutually exclusive with an allograft. They may be employed to achieve profound cytoreduction before and enhance graft-versus-myeloma effects as consolidation/maintenance therapy after an allograft. However, this combination should be explored only in well-designed clinical trials.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma beyond 2010

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is considered the gold standard in the frontline therapy of younger patients with multiple myeloma because it results in higher complete remission (CR) rates and longer event-free survival than conventional chemotherapy. The greatest benefit from ASCT is obtained in patients achieving CR after transplantation, the likelihood of CR being associated with the M-protein size at the time of transplantation. The incorporation of novel agents results in higher pre- and posttransplantation CR rates. Induction with bortezomib-containing regimens is encouraging in patients with poor-risk cytogenetics. However, longer follow-up is required to assess the impact of this increased CR on long-term survival. The results of posttransplantation consolidation/maintenance with new drugs are encouraging. All this indicates that, in the era of novel agents, high-dose therapy should be optimized rather than replaced. Because of its high transplantation-related mortality, myeloablative allografting has been generally replaced by reduced-intensity conditioning (reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic transplantation). The best results are achieved after a debulky ASCT, with a progression-free survival plateau of 25% to 30% beyond 6 years from reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic transplantation. The development of novel reduced-intensity preparative regimens and peri- and posttransplantation strategies aimed at minimizing graft-versus-host disease, and enhancing the graft-versus-myeloma effect are key issues.

Long-term follow-up of an intensified myeloablative conditioning regimen with in vivo T cell depletion followed by allografting in patients with advanced multiple myeloma

We report long-term results after a median follow-up of 105 months in 18 patients with multiple myeloma who received an intensified myeloablative conditioning regimen regimen consisting of modified total body irradiation, busulfan, cyclophosphamide, and antithymocyte globulin, followed by allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). Grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease occurred in 7 patients (44%), and treatment-related mortality was 17%. Complete remission (CR) with negative immunofixation after allogeneic SCT occurred in 53% of the patients. For all patients, the estimated overall survival at 12 years was 50% (95% confidence interval [CI], 26%-74%), and the estimated event-free survival (EFS) was 35% (95% CI, 23%-57%). Those patients who achieved CR after SCT had a 12-year estimated PFS of 60%, whereas none of the patients without CR remained progression-free. Our data indicate that an intensified myeloablative conditioning regimen followed by allogeneic SCT can produce long-term survival and freedom from disease in patients with multiple myeloma who achieve CR.