How I treat unexplained arterial thrombosis

Near-infrared-II photoacoustic imaging and photo-triggered synergistic treatment of thrombosis via fibrin-specific homopolymer nanoparticles

The formation of an occlusive thrombus in the blood vessel is the main culprit for numerous life-threatening cardiovascular diseases that represent the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Herein, we develop a polymer nanoplatform that integrates long-wavelength second near-infrared (NIR-II) photoacoustic imaging-based thrombosis detection and antithrombotic activity. We design and synthesize a semiconducting homopolymer with strong absorption in the NIR-II region and molecular motion that boosts photothermal conversion and photoacoustic signal. We dope the homopolymer with a thermosensitive nitric oxide donor to formulate a nanoplatform, on which a fibrin-specific ligand is functionalized to ensure selective thrombus targeting. We show that with strong NIR-II light harvesting capability, bright photoacoustic signal and active thrombus accumulation ability, the NIR-II photoacoustic nanoprobes are able to sensitively and selectively delineate thrombi. We find that the nanoplatform also displays rapid and efficient blood clot removal activity with nearly complete blood flow restoration in both carotid thrombosis models and low extremity arterial thrombosis models under NIR-II light trigger by integrating a thrombus-localized photothermal effect and on-demand nitric oxide release. This nanoplatform offers a versatile approach for the diagnosis and treatment of life-threatening diseases caused by various thrombotic disorders.

Factor V Leiden, prothrombin, MTHFR, and PAI-1 gene polymorphisms in patients with arterial disease: A comprehensive systematic-review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The role of inherited thrombophilia in arterial disease is uncertain. We performed a systematic-review and meta-analysis of inherited thrombophilia in cerebrovascular (CVD), coronary heart (CHD), and peripheral artery disease (PAD) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched up to February 2022. Pooled prevalences (PPs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95 % confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated in a random-effects model. Factor V Leiden (G1691A), prothrombin (G20210A), MTHFR C677T/A1298C and PAI-1 4G/5G were evaluated.

RESULTS

377 studies for 98,186 patients (32,791 CVD, 62,266 CHD, 3129 PAD) and 108,569 controls were included. Overall, 37,249 patients had G1691A, 32,254 G20210A, 42,546 MTHFR C677T, 8889 MTHFR A1298C, and 19,861 PAI-1 4G/5G gene polymorphisms. In CVD patients, PPs were 6.5 % for G1691A, 3.9 % for G20210A, 56.4 % for MTHFR C677T, 51.9 % for MTHFR A1298C, and 77.6 % for PAI-1. In CHD, corresponding PPs were 7.2 %, 3.8 %, 52.3 %, 53.9 %, and 76.4 %. In PAD, PPs were 6.9 %, 4.7 %, 55.1 %, 52.1 %, and 75.0 %, respectively. Strongest ORs in CVD were for homozygous G1691A (2.76; 95 %CI, 1.83-4.18) and for homozygous G20210A (3.96; 95 %CI, 2.05-7.64). Strongest ORs in CHD were for homozygous G1691A (OR 1.68; 95%CI, 1.02-2.77) and G20210A (heterozygous 1.49 95%CI, 1.22-1.82; homozygous 1.54 95%CI, 0.79-2.99). The OR for PAI-1 4G/4G in PAD was 5.44 (95%CI, 1.80-16.43). Specific subgroups with higher PPs and ORs were identified according to age and region.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with arterial disease have an increased prevalence and odds of having some inherited thrombophilia. Some thrombophilia testing may be considered in specific subgroups of patients.

Adherence to thrombophilia testing guidelines and its influence on anticoagulation therapy: A single-center cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION

The collected evidence on thrombophilia guidelines is scarce and data about their impact on clinical decisions are unknown. We aimed to investigate the adherence to thrombophilia testing guidelines, its therapeutic impact in patients with guideline-adherent and non-adherent testing and identify the patients' clinical characteristics mostly associated with treatment decisions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a single-center cross-sectional study of patients referred for thrombophilia testing at the outpatient clinic of a tertiary hospital between 01/2010-10/2020. We systematically evaluated the adherence of thrombophilia testing to internal guidelines and the influence of test results on anticoagulation therapy. Using multivariable logistic regression, we evaluated the association between clinical characteristics and influence of thrombophilia tests on anticoagulation therapy in the entire cohort and by indication for referral.

RESULTS

Of 3686 included patients, mostly referred for venous thromboembolism (2407, 65 %) or arterial thrombosis (591, 16 %), 3550 patients (96 %) underwent thrombophilia testing. Indication for testing was according to guidelines in 1208 patients (33 %). Test results influenced treatment decisions in 56 of 1102 work-ups (5.1 %) that were adherent to guidelines, and in 237 of 2448 (9.7 %) non-adherent work-ups (absolute difference, 4.3 %; 95 % confidence interval, 2.9-6.3 %). Age < 50 years, female sex, absence of risk factors and co-morbidities, weakly provoked venous thromboembolism and referral indication other than venous thromboembolism were associated with influence on anticoagulation therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence to guidelines for thrombophilia testing was poor and did not have an impact on treatment decisions. Refinement of selection criteria is needed to increase the therapeutic impact of thrombophilia testing.

A Review of Systemic Hematological Manifestations and Stent Thrombosis

Stent thrombosis (ST) has significant morbidity and mortality following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). ST is uncommon making the identification of nonprocedural predictors challenging. Numerous case reports of ST in both benign and malignant hematological conditions exist. Given ST could be a Herald event of an undiagnosed condition and condition-specific treatment may be available, it is important to consider specialist testing in an unexplained ST. This review included a case presentation of ST in previously undiagnosed paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) and a literature review of ST in other acquired thrombophilias including myeloproliferative disorders (MPNs), antiphospholipid syndrome, hematological malignancies, and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Inherited thrombophilias and common pitfalls in thrombophilia and coagulation testing are also discussed. The cardiac-hematology landscape is becoming increasingly complex and there is a paucity of how to best manage ST in these patients. There is clear variability in practice and the use of multidisciplinary input between cardiologists and hematologists is essential.

Molecularly self-fueled nano-penetrator for nonpharmaceutical treatment of thrombosis and ischemic stroke

Thrombotic cerebro-cardiovascular diseases are the leading causes of disability and death worldwide. However, current drug therapeutics are compromised by narrow therapeutic windows, unsatisfactory thrombolysis effects, severe bleeding events, and high recurrence rates. In this study, we exploit a self-propelling nano-penetrator with high fuel loading and controllable motion features, which is molecularly co-assembled using a photothermal photosensitizer (DiR) and a photothermal-activable NO donor (BNN6). The precisely engineered nano-penetrator of the BNN6-DiR fuel pair shows distinct advantages in terms of NO productivity and autonomous motion under laser irradiation. In animal models of artery/vein thrombosis and acute ischemic stroke, the self-fueled nano-penetrator enables self-navigated thrombus-homing accumulation, self-propelled clot deep penetration, fluorescence image-guided photothermal/mechanical thrombolysis, and NO-mediated prevention of thrombosis recurrence and acute ischemic stroke salvage. As expected, the molecularly self-fueled nano-penetrator displayed favorable therapeutic outcomes without bleeding risk compared to the clinically available thrombolytic drug. This study offers a facile, safe, and effective nonpharmaceutical modality towards the clinical treatment of thrombosis and ischemic stroke.

Previously undiagnosed cancer in patients with arterial thrombotic events - A population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Emerging data suggest increased arterial thrombosis risk in the months preceding a cancer diagnosis.

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether patients without documented vascular risk factors or pre-existing cardiovascular disease have a higher relative risk of cancer 12 months after arterial thrombotic events (ATE), compared to unselected patients.

PATIENTS/METHODS

A population-based cohort study of Clalit Health Services (CHS) database included CHS members ≥25 years without prior cancer or ATE (n = 2 804 584). An iterative matching process selected 10 potential controls chronologically for each consecutive exposed, age- and sex-matched (actual controls drawn 1:1 from a lot). Study exposure, ATE, was defined as ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction or systemic arterial thromboembolism during hospitalization. The outcome was newly-diagnosed cancer within 12 months, based on Israeli national cancer registry. Cox proportional hazards multivariate regression calculated hazard ratio (HR) for outcomes, adjusted for cancer risk factors. Analysis also performed for three subgroups: age ≤50 years; no cardiovascular risk factors; no prior cardiovascular disease.

RESULTS

The full ATE and matched control cohorts included 43 108 patients. The 12-month cumulative incidence of cancer (95% confidence interval) was 0.020 (0.019-0.022) in the ATE cohort and 0.012 (0.011-0.013) in controls, corresponding to an adjusted HR of 1.665 (1.489-1.862). The relative risk of cancer was high in all subgroups up to a HR of 3.754 (1.912-7.372) in patients without cardiovascular risk factors.

CONCLUSION

There is an increased risk of previously undiagnosed cancer at 12 months after ATE, especially in patients without documented vascular risk factors or pre-existent cardiovascular disease.

Unexplained arterial thrombosis: approach to diagnosis and treatment

Arterial thrombotic events in younger patients without a readily apparent etiology present significant diagnostic and management challenges. We present a structured approach to diagnosis with consideration of common causes, including atherosclerosis and embolism, as well as uncommon causes, including medications and substances, vascular and anatomic abnormalities, systemic disorders, and thrombophilias. We highlight areas of management that have evolved within the past 5 years, including the use of dual-pathway inhibition in atherosclerotic disease, antithrombotic therapy selection in embolic stroke of undetermined source and left ventricular thrombus, the role of closure of patent foramen ovale for secondary stroke prevention, and the thrombotic potential of coronavirus disease 2019 infection and vaccination. We conclude with a representative case to illustrate the application of the diagnostic framework and discuss the importance of consideration of bleeding risk and patient preference in determining the appropriate management plan.

Clonal Megakaryocyte Dysplasia with Normal Blood Values Is a Distinct Myeloproliferative Neoplasm

INTRODUCTION

In 1991, we reported 18 persons with a clinical-pathologic entity and termed atypical myeloproliferative disorder because they did not meet the contemporary diagnostic criteria for a myeloproliferative neoplasm. We sought to gain further knowledge on this disease entity.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included consecutive subjects registered in the database of the Center for the Study of Myelofibrosis in Pavia, Italy, from 1998 to 2020 (June), and diagnosed with atypical myeloproliferative disorder according to our adjudicated criteria. We studied clinical, histological, cytogenetic, and molecular covariates and risks of thrombosis, disease progression, and death. Data were compared with those of concurrent subjects with prefibrotic myelofibrosis.

RESULTS

Fifteen new subjects with atypical myeloproliferative disorder were identified. Seven were male. Median age was 50 years (IQR, 41-54 years). Thirteen were diagnosed with a synchronous symptomatic or incidentally detected thrombotic event. The bone marrow showed megakaryocyte hyperplasia with dysplasia. JAK2V617F was present in 10 subjects and CALR mutation in one. No other somatic mutations were identified in next generation sequencing. After a median follow-up of 101 months (IQR, 40-160 months), no subject had disease progression or blast transformation. Incidence of post-diagnosis or recurrent thrombosis was 3.9 events (95% confidence interval, 3.5-4.0) and 5.0 events (4.6-5.6) per 100 person-years. Features of subjects with atypical myeloproliferative disorder differed markedly from those of 546 subjects with prefibrotic myelofibrosis.

CONCLUSION

Our data indicate that these 15 persons have a distinct myeloproliferative neoplasm. We propose naming this new disorder clonal megakaryocyte dysplasia with normal blood values.

Current Practice and Clinical Utility of Thrombophilia Testing in Hospitalized Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Testing for thrombophilic disorders is often performed in patients after cryptogenic ischemic stroke in an attempt to identify a hematologic explanation for the event. However, the role of commonly tested thrombophilias in ischemic stroke is poorly defined. There is limited evidence to quantify how these disorders affect ischemic stroke risk and testing practices are highly variable.

METHODS

Retrospective evaluation of thrombophilia testing practices and clinical outcomes was performed in hospitalized patients with acute ischemic stroke (n = 1898) at a large academic hospital over a two-year period. Variables assessed included testing components, timing of testing, number of abnormal results, and frequency of change in clinical management prompted by abnormal results. A provider survey was also performed to assess perceptions of current testing practices and provider understanding of testing indications.

RESULTS

Thrombophilia testing was performed in 190 (10%) patients admitted for acute ischemic stroke. Of those tested, 137 (72.1%) had at least one abnormal result, but this decreased to 37.4% when elevated factor VIII activity was excluded. An abnormal result prompted initiation of anticoagulation in only 4 patients (2%). The provider survey indicated that all providers (100%) were selecting thrombophilia tests using a pre-existing order set and were interested in additional education on testing indications and interpretation. Comparison to similar studies at other institutions revealed significant variation in testing practices, and a small proportion of patients in which testing prompted a change in management (1-8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Thrombophilia testing is frequently obtained in hospitalized patients with acute ischemic stroke, yet testing only changed management in 2% of patients. Efforts to improve provider education and the stewardship of testing are needed to ensure appropriate evaluation and treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke.