Targeting CD300f to enhance hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia

Clarithromycin-treated chronic spontaneous urticaria with the negative regulation of FcεRΙ and MRGPRX2 activation via CD300f

Mast cells (MCs) are main effector cells in chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). Both Fc epsilon RI (FcεRΙ)- and MAS-related G coupled receptor-X2 (MRGPRX2)-mediated MC activations affect CSU course. Leukocyte mono-immunoglobulin-like receptor 3 (CD300f) has been shown to regulate FcεRΙ activation. However, no study has verified CD300f is a target to cure CSU. Therefore this study aimed to verify whether clarithromycin (CLA) regulates FcεRΙ- and MRGPRX2-mediated MC activations via CD300f and shows therapeutic effect on CSU. The target of CLA was verification. CLA inhibited FcεRΙ- and MRGPRX2-mediated MC activations were shown in vivo and in vitro. A single-center, self-comparison study was performed, and CLA-treated CSU was investigated in 28 patients who were not sensitive to the third-generation antihistamines. Serum inflammatory mediators in patients before and after CLA administration were analyzed. CLA effectively inhibited type Ι anaphylactic reactions and pseudo-allergic reactions in mice. Moreover, CLA inhibited FcεRΙ- and MRGPRX2-mediated MC signaling pathway activation. Regulatory effects of CLA were decreased significantly after CD300f knockdown. CLA effectively alleviated the symptoms of wheal and itch and reduced serum cytokine levels in patients. CLA negatively regulated FcεRΙ- and MRGPRX2-mediated MC activation via CD300f and showed significant therapeutic effect on CSU.

Pan-cancer analysis identifies CD300 molecules as potential immune regulators and promising therapeutic targets in acute myeloid leukemia

BACKGROUND

CD300s are a group of proteins playing vital roles in immune responses. However, much is yet to be elucidated regarding the expression patterns and clinical significances of CD300s in cancers.

METHODS

In this study, we comprehensively investigated CD300s in a pan-cancer manner using multi-omic data from The Cancer Genome Atlas. We also studied the relationship between CD300s and the immune landscape of AML.

RESULTS

We found that CD300A-CD300LF were generally overexpressed in tumors (especially AML), whereas CD300LG was more often downregulated. In AML, transactivation of CD300A was not mediated by genetic alterations but by histone modification. Survival analyses revealed that high CD300A-CD300LF expression predicted poor outcome in AML patients; the prognostic value of CD300A was validated in seven independent datasets and a meta dataset including 1115 AML patients. Furthermore, we demonstrated that CD300A expression could add prognostic value in refining existing risk models in AML. Importantly, CD300A-CD300LF expression was closely associated with T-cell dysfunction score and could predict response to AML immunotherapy. Also, CD300A was found to be positively associated with HLA genes and critical immune checkpoints in AML, such as VISTA, CD86, CD200R1, Tim-3, and the LILRB family genes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated CD300s as potential prognostic biomarker and an ideal immunotherapy target in AML, which warrants future functional and clinical studies.

Worked to the bone: antibody-based conditioning as the future of transplant biology

Conditioning of the bone marrow prior to haematopoietic stem cell transplant is essential in eradicating the primary cause of disease, facilitating donor cell engraftment and avoiding transplant rejection via immunosuppression. Standard conditioning regimens, typically comprising chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, have proven successful in bone marrow clearance but are also associated with severe toxicities and high incidence of treatment-related mortality. Antibody-based conditioning is a developing field which, thus far, has largely shown an improved toxicity profile in experimental models and improved transplant outcomes, compared to traditional conditioning. Most antibody-based conditioning therapies involve monoclonal/naked antibodies, such as alemtuzumab for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis and rituximab for Epstein–Barr virus prophylaxis, which are both in Phase II trials for inclusion in conditioning regimens. Nevertheless, alternative immune-based therapies, including antibody–drug conjugates, radio-labelled antibodies and CAR-T cells, are showing promise in a conditioning setting. Here, we analyse the current status of antibody-based drugs in pre-transplant conditioning regimens and assess their potential in the future of transplant biology.

Hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells directly participate in host immune response

The properties of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs), including self-renewal and pluripotency, have been extensively studied. These features have been explored in the management of several haematological disorders and malignancies. Although their role as precursors of innate immune cells is well understood, little is known about their direct participation in host immune response. In this review, we explicate the direct role of HSPCs in the host immune response and highlight therapeutic options for the infectious disease burden that is currently ravaging the world, including COVID-19.

Therapy Development by Genome Editing of Hematopoietic Stem Cells

Accessibility of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) for the manipulation and repopulation of the blood and immune systems has placed them at the forefront of cell and gene therapy development. Recent advances in genome-editing tools, in particular for clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein (Cas) and CRISPR/Cas-derived editing systems, have transformed the gene therapy landscape. Their versatility and the ability to edit genomic sequences and facilitate gene disruption, correction or insertion, have broadened the spectrum of potential gene therapy targets and accelerated the development of potential curative therapies for many rare diseases treatable by transplantation or modification of HSCs. Ongoing developments seek to address efficiency and precision of HSC modification, tolerability of treatment and the distribution and affordability of corresponding therapies. Here, we give an overview of recent progress in the field of HSC genome editing as treatment for inherited disorders and summarize the most significant findings from corresponding preclinical and clinical studies. With emphasis on HSC-based therapies, we also discuss technical hurdles that need to be overcome en route to clinical translation of genome editing and indicate advances that may facilitate routine application beyond the most common disorders.

Cell-based and antibody-mediated immunotherapies directed against leukemic stem cells in acute myeloid leukemia: Perspectives and open issues

Despite new insights in molecular features of leukemic cells and the availability of novel treatment approaches and drugs, acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains a major clinical challenge. In fact, many patients with AML relapse after standard therapy and eventually die from progressive disease. The basic concept of leukemic stem cells (LSC) has been coined with the goal to decipher clonal architectures in various leukemia-models and to develop curative drug therapies by eliminating LSC. Indeed, during the past few years, various immunotherapies have been tested in AML, and several of these therapies follow the strategy to eliminate relevant leukemic subclones by introducing LSC-targeting antibodies or LSC-targeting immune cells. These therapies include, among others, new generations of LSC-eliminating antibody-constructs, checkpoint-targeting antibodies, bi-specific antibodies, and CAR-T or CAR-NK cell-based strategies. However, responses are often limited and/or transient which may be due to LSC resistance. Indeed, AML LSC exhibit multiple forms of resistance against various drugs and immunotherapies. An additional problems are treatment-induced myelotoxicity and other side effects. The current article provides a short overview of immunological targets expressed on LSC in AML. Moreover, cell-based therapies and immunotherapies tested in AML are discussed. Finally, the article provides an overview about LSC resistance and strategies to overcome resistance.