Letermovir reduces chronic GVHD risk in calcineurin inhibitor-free GVHD prophylaxis after hematopoietic cell transplantation

Does PTCY increase the risk of infections?

PTCY has been mainly used in haploidentical transplant (haploHSCT), but its use in matched donors allowed better evaluation of infectious risk conferred separately by PTCY or donor type. PTCY increased the risk of bacterial infections, both in haploidentical and matched donors, mainly pre-engraftment bacteremias. Bacterial infections, particularly due to multidrug-resistant Gram-negatives, were main causes of infection-related deaths. Higher rates of CMV and other viral infections were reported, mainly in haploHSCT. The role of donor might be more important than the role of PTCY. PTCY increased the risk of BK virus associated hemorrhagic cystitis, and seemed associated with higher risk of respiratory viral infections. Fungal infections were frequent in haploHSCT PCTY cohorts without mold active prophylaxis, but the exact role of PTCY needs to be established. Infections appear to be increased in patients receiving PTCY, although the exact role of GvHD prophylaxis and donor type can only be assessed in prospective trials.

Low-dose anti-thymocyte globulin plus low-dose post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based regimen for prevention of graft-versus-host disease after haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplants: a large sample, long-term follow-up retrospective study

Introduction

The novel low-dose anti-thymocyte (ATG, 5 mg/kg) plus low-dose post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy, 50 mg/kg) (low-dose ATG/PTCy)-based regimen had promising activity for prevention of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in haploidentical-peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (haplo-PBSCT), but its impacts on long-term outcomes remain to be defined.

Methods

We performed a large sample, long-term follow-up retrospective study to evaluate its efficacy for GVHD prophylaxis.

Results

The study enrolled 260 patients, including 162 with myeloid malignancies and 98 with lymphoid malignancies. The median follow-up time was 27.0 months. For the entire cohort, the cumulative incidences (CIs) of grade II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD (aGVHD) by 180 days were 13.46% (95% CI, 9.64%-17.92%) and 5.77% (95% CI, 3.37%-9.07%); while total and moderate/severe chronic GVHD (cGVHD) by 2 years were 30.97% (95% CI, 25.43%-36.66%) and 18.08% (95% CI, 13.68%-22.98%), respectively. The 2-year overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS), non-relapse mortality (NRM), and CIs of relapse were 60.7% (95% CI, 54.8%-67.10%), 58.1% (95% CI, 52.2%-64.5%), 50.6% (95% CI, 44.8-57.1%), 23.04% (95% CI, 18.06%-28.40%), and 18.09% (95% CI, 14.33%-23.97%, respectively. The 1-year CIs of cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation were 43.46% (95% CI, 37.39%-49.37%) and 18.08% (95% CI, 13.68%-22.98%), respectively. In multivariate analysis, the disease status at transplantation was associated with inferior survivor outcomes for all patients and myeloid and lymphoid malignancies, while cGVHD had superior outcomes for all patients and myeloid malignancies, but not for lymphoid malignancies.

Discussion

The results demonstrated that the novel regimen could effectively prevent the occurrence of aGVHD in haplo-PBSCT.

Dynamics of polyclonal immuno-reconstitution after allogeneic transplant with post-transplant cyclophosphamide and letermovir

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivations are strong stimulators of immune-reconstitution (IR) in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients. Herein, we analyzed 317 CMV-seropositive consecutive patients (n = 109 letermovir, LTV; n = 208 no-LTV), undergoing HSCT with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) and calcineurin inhibitor- (CNI) free graft-versus-host-disease (GvHD) prophylaxis. At day+90, median CD19+/mm3 was higher in LTV-cohort: 5.5 [0;439] versus 2 [0;294], p = 0.008; median CD3+/mm3 counts were lower in LTV-cohort, with no differences in CD4+, CD8+ and NK-cells. At day+180 median CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+/mm3 values were comparable between groups. Higher CD19+/mm3 counts were observed in LTV-cohort: 62 [0; 2983] versus 42 [0; 863]. Significantly higher median NK/mm3 values were seen in LTV-cohort: 225.5 [0;763] versus 163.5 [0;1181], p = 0.0003. The impact of LTV on B-cell IR at 3 months and NK-cell levels at 6 months was retained in multivariate analysis (p < 0.01), whereas the effect on T-cells was not confirmed. Moreover, we confirmed a significant reduction of clinically-relevant CMV, and moderate-to- severe chronic GvHD in LTV-cohort. Overall, in our study the use of LTV was associated with a slight improvement of B-cell and NK-cells reconstitution, with only minor impact on T-cell subsets, giving new insights on polyclonal IR for HSCT recipients in the LTV era.

CD4+ T cells are the major predictor of HCMV control in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients on letermovir prophylaxis

Introduction

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) causes significant morbidity and mortality in allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT) recipients. Recently, antiviral letermovir prophylaxis during the first 100 days after alloSCT replaced PCR-guided preemptive therapy as the primary standard of care for HCMV reactivations. Here, we compared NK-cell and T-cell reconstitution in alloSCT recipients receiving preemptive therapy or letermovir prophylaxis in order to identify potential biomarkers predicting prolonged and symptomatic HCMV reactivation.

Methods

To that end, the NK-cell and T-cell repertoire of alloSCT recipients managed with preemptive therapy (n=32) or letermovir prophylaxis (n=24) was characterized by flow cytometry on days +30, +60, +90 and +120 after alloSCT. Additionally, background-corrected HCMV-specific T-helper (CD4+IFNγ+) and cytotoxic (CD8+IFNγ+CD107a+) T cells were quantified after pp65 stimulation.

Results

Compared to preemptive therapy, letermovir prophylaxis prevented HCMV reactivation and decreased HCMV peak viral loads until days +120 and +365. Letermovir prophylaxis resulted in decreased T-cell numbers but increased NK-cell numbers. Interestingly, despite the inhibition of HCMV, we found high numbers of "memory-like" (CD56dimFcεRIγ- and/or CD159c+) NK cells and an expansion of HCMV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in letermovir recipients. We further compared immunological readouts in patients on letermovir prophylaxis with non/short-term HCMV reactivation (NSTR) and prolonged/symptomatic HCMV reactivation (long-term HCMV reactivation, LTR). Median HCMV-specific CD4+ T-cell frequencies were significantly higher in NSTR patients (day +60, 0.35 % vs. 0.00 % CD4+IFNγ+/CD4+ cells, p=0.018) than in patients with LTR, whereas patients with LTR had significantly higher median regulatory T-cell (Treg) frequencies (day +90, 2.2 % vs. 6.2 % CD4+CD25+CD127dim/CD4+ cells, p=0.019). ROC analysis confirmed low HCMV specific CD4+ (AUC on day +60: 0.813, p=0.019) and high Treg frequencies (AUC on day +90: 0.847, p=0.021) as significant predictors of prolonged and symptomatic HCMV reactivation.

Discussion

Taken together, letermovir prophylaxis delays HCMV reactivation and alters NK- and T-cell reconstitution. High numbers of HCMV-specific CD4+ T cells and low numbers of Tregs seem to be pivotal to suppress post-alloSCT HCMV reactivation during letermovir prophylaxis. Administration of more advanced immunoassays that include Treg signature cytokines might contribute to the identification of patients at high-risk for long-term and symptomatic HCMV reactivation who might benefit from prolonged administration of letermovir.

Optimizing the treatment of cytomegalovirus infection in allo-HSCT recipients

INTRODUCTION

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection continues to negatively impact the prognosis after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), even with active monitoring and preemptive strategies. Recent progress in pharmacology, immunotherapy, and vaccines has improved the strategy of CMV management.

AREAS COVERED

We summarized recent advances in managing CMV infection post allo-HSCT, including diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment. In this review, we mainly focused on approaches that have optimized or might optimize the management of CMV infection after allo-HSCT.

EXPERT OPINION

In our opinion, optimized management covers aspects including the serial monitoring of CMV-DNA and CMI, an accurate diagnosis, effective prophylaxis, and a rational preemptive therapy integrating antiviral drugs and cell therapies. Strategies based on the understanding of CMV pathogenesis and CMV-related immune reconstitution after allo-HSCT will be a direction in future studies.

Letermovir as Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis in a Pediatric Cohort: A Retrospective Analysis

Letermovir is an attractive cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylactic agent, but published data in children are scarce. This retrospective chart review aimed to describe our experience using letermovir as CMV prophylaxis in pediatric hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients. Pediatric patients (age <20 years) undergoing allogeneic HCT and receiving letermovir prophylaxis in the Mayo Clinic Pediatric Bone Marrow Transplant Program were eligible for inclusion in this retrospective chart review. Medical records were reviewed to evaluate letermovir dosing, CMV levels, laboratory values, and reports of adverse effects. Between October 2020 and April 2022, 9 patients age 4 to 19 years undergoing allogeneic HCT in the Pediatric Bone Marrow Transplant Program received letermovir prophylaxis, either 240 mg or 480 mg daily at a mean and median dose of 10 mg/kg/day. Letermovir was crushed and administered via nasogastric tube in 4 of 9 patients. Two patients received letermovir for secondary CMV prophylaxis after initial treatment with ganciclovir/valganciclovir, and the remaining 7 received letermovir for primary prophylaxis. One patient, a 20-kg 6-year-old female receiving 240 mg (12 mg/kg), experienced low-level CMV viremia while on letermovir. No other patients experienced CMV reactivation while on letermovir prophylaxis. In 2 patients, transient mild transaminitis was noted within the first weeks of letermovir therapy, which resolved without intervention, and its relationship to letermovir could not be clearly established. Letermovir administration was feasible and well tolerated as CMV prophylaxis in our small cohort of pediatric patients undergoing HCT. Larger, prospective studies are warranted to confirm the safety and efficacy of letermovir in children. © 2022 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.