Lenalidomide-associated B-cell ALL: clinical and pathologic correlates and sensitivity to lenalidomide withdrawal

A pre-B acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell line model reveals the mechanism of thalidomide therapy-related B-cell leukemogenesis

Lenalidomide, a thalidomide derivative, is prescribed as maintenance therapy for multiple myeloma (MM). Patients with MM receiving lenalidomide were found to develop a distinct therapy-related B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). However, the molecular mechanism by which lenalidomide drives B-ALL is unknown. We show that thalidomide treatment of B cell lines increased CD34 expression and fibronectin adhesion. This resembled the effects of Ikzf1 loss of function mutations in B-ALL. IKZF1 is a transcription factor that can act as both a transcriptional activator and a repressor depending upon the target loci. In our experiments, thalidomide-induced degradation of IKZF1 increased the expression of its transcriptional repression targets Itga5 and CD34 explaining the increased adhesion and stemness. Strikingly, withdrawal of thalidomide lead to the mis-localization of IKZF1 to the cytoplasm. Moreover, chromatin immunoprecipitation data showed a long-term effect of thalidomide treatment on IKZF1 target loci. This included decreased chromatin occupancy at early B cell factor 1 (EBF1) and Spi1 (PU.1). Consequently, B-cell lineage specifying transcription factors including Pax5, Spi1 and EBF1 were downregulated even after 7 days of thalidomide withdrawal. Our study thus provides a molecular mechanism of thalidomide-induced B-ALL whereby thalidomide alters the chromatin occupancy of IKZF1 at key B-cell lineage transcription factors leading to a persistent block in B-cell differentiation.

Minimal Residual Disease-Adapted Therapy in Multiple Myeloma: Current Evidence and Opinions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a biologically heterogeneous malignancy with relatively uniform treatment paradigms. This review aims to assess the growing role of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) assessment in facilitating response-adapted therapeutic decision making to individualize therapy in MM.

RECENT FINDINGS

MRD has been repeatedly demonstrated to provide strong prognostic information, superseding traditional IMWG response criteria. The use of MRD to modulate therapy remains controversial. Here, we review the existing landscape of MRD-adapted trial designs in both induction/consolidation and maintenance settings, including recent data from influential studies and retrospective analyses. We navigate existing data, leverage the increased resolution of longitudinal MRD assessments, and comment on trials in progress to explain our current utilization of MRD in the clinic. MRD transcends traditional response assessments by providing a window into disease-treatment interaction over time. As a strong patient-level surrogate, MRD has limited current use in individualizing treatment, but is poised to comprehensively shape treatment strategies at many key points in a patient's MM course.

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia with Myeloid Mutations Is a High-Risk Disease Associated with Clonal Hematopoiesis

Myeloid neoplasms arise from preexisting clonal hematopoiesis (CH); however, the role of CH in the pathogenesis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is unknown. We found that 18% of adult ALL cases harbored TP53, and 16% had myeloid CH-associated gene mutations. ALL with myeloid mutations (MyM) had distinct genetic and clinical characteristics, associated with inferior survival. By using single-cell proteogenomic analysis, we demonstrated that myeloid mutations were present years before the diagnosis of ALL, and a subset of these clones expanded over time to manifest as dominant clones in ALL. Single-cell RNA sequencing revealed upregulation of genes associated with cell survival and resistance to apoptosis in B-ALL with MyM, which responds better to newer immunotherapeutic approaches. These findings define ALL with MyM as a high-risk disease that can arise from antecedent CH and offer new mechanistic insights to develop better therapeutic and preventative strategies.

SIGNIFICANCE

CH is a precursor lesion for lymphoblastic leukemogenesis. ALL with MyM has distinct genetic and clinical characteristics, associated with adverse survival outcomes after chemotherapy. CH can precede ALL years before diagnosis, and ALL with MyM is enriched with activated T cells that respond to immunotherapies such as blinatumomab. See related commentary by Iacobucci, p. 142.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions: Will CAR-T Replace ASCT in NDMM

The treatment landscape for multiple myeloma (MM) has rapidly evolved over the last 2 decades. The development of triplet and quadruplet regimens including proteasome inhibitors (PI), immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs), and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies has dramatically extended overall survival. In addition to effective multidrug regimens, autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is a cornerstone of management in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). However, despite these combined treatment modalities, curative therapy for MM remains elusive. Recent, novel immunotherapies including chimeric antigen T-cell (CAR-T) therapy have demonstrated deep and durable responses in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Currently 2 CAR-T products, ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) and idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel), are approved by the FDA for the treatment of RRMM. The success of CAR-T therapy revolutionized the management of RRMM prompting clinical trials studying CAR-T therapy in the first line setting. The ongoing KarMMa-4, CARTITUDE-5, and CARTITUDE-6 clinical trials may establish CAR-T therapy as a first line option potentially supplanting ASCT in the initial treatment of NDMM. In this review, we discuss the current standard of care management of NDMM, trace the evolution of CAR-T clinical trials in RRMM, and survey ongoing clinical trials studying CAR-T therapy in NDMM.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is equally effective in secondary acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) compared to de-novo ALL-a report from the EBMT registry

Secondary acute lymphoblastic leukemia (s-ALL) comprises up to 10% of ALL patients. However, data regarding s-ALL outcomes is limited. To answer what is the role of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in s-ALL, a matched-pair analysis in a 1:2 ratio was conducted to compare outcomes between s-ALL and de novo ALL (dn-ALL) patients reported between 2000-2021 to the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry. Among 9720 ALL patients, 351 (3.6%) were s-ALL, of which 80 were in first complete remission (CR1) with a known precedent primary diagnosis 58.8% solid tumor (ST), 41.2% hematological diseases (HD). The estimated 2-year relapse incidence (RI) was 19.1% (95%CI: 11-28.9), leukemia-free survival (LFS) 52.1% (95%CI: 39.6-63.2), non-relapse mortality (NRM) 28.8% (95%CI: 18.4-40), GvHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) 39.4% (95%CI: 27.8-50.7), and overall survival (OS) 60.8% (95%CI: 47.9-71.4), and did not differ between ST and HD patients. In a matched-pair analysis, there was no difference in RI, GRFS, NRM, LFS, or OS between s-ALL and dn-ALL except for a higher incidence of chronic GvHD (51.9% vs. 31.4%) in s-ALL. To conclude, patients with s-ALL who received HCT in CR1 have comparable outcomes to patients with dn-ALL.

Harnessing the Immune System: An Effective Way to Manage Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a heterogenous hematological disorder with malignant potential controlled by immunological characteristics of the tumor microenvironment. Rapid breakthrough in the molecular pathways has made immunological approaches the main anchor in the management of DLBCL, with or without chemotherapeutic agents. Rituximab was the first monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of DLBCL. Following rituximab that transformed the therapeutic landscape, other novel immunological agents including chimeric antigen T-cell therapy have reshaped the management of relapsed/refractory DLBCL. However, resistance and refractory state remain a challenge in the management of DLBCL. For this literature review, we screened articles from Medline, Embase, Cochrane databases and the European/North American guidelines from March 2010 through October 2022 for DLBCL. Here we discuss immunological agents that will significantly affect future treatment of this aggressive type of lymphoma.